BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

Transcription

1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION FADIA R. KHOURY RUSSELL A. ARCHER Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Russell.Archer@sce.com Dated: April 16, 2018

2 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION Pursuant to Rule 8.4(a) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public Utilities Commission (Commission), Southern California Edison Company (SCE) hereby gives notice of the following notice of ex parte communications. The communications occurred on Tuesday, April 11, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and April 12, 2018, at 3:00 p.m. (lasting approximately 35 minutes) at the offices of the Commission located at 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, California. The communications were oral and the attached written materials were also distributed during the meetings. SCE initiated the communication with Ehren Seybert, advisor to Commissioner Carla J. Peterman on April 11, Attending the meeting for SCE were Laura Genao, SCE s Managing Director of Regulatory Affairs, and Russell Garwacki, Director of Pricing, Design and Research. SCE initiated the communication with David Peck, advisor to Commission President Michael Picker on April 12, Attending the meeting for SCE were Laura Genao, SCE s Managing Director of Regulatory Affairs (in person), Erin Pulgar, Senior Advisor of State Regulatory Operations (telephonically), and Russell Garwacki, Director of Pricing, Design and Research (telephonically). 1

3 SCE s representatives discussed SCE s proposed TOU periods, specifically noting that SCE s proposed TOU periods align with the state s GHG goals and previous CPUC direction on TOU periods, and that an expeditious decision in SCE s pending Rate Design Window proceeding (A ) is necessary in order to enable the implementation of the proposed TOU periods. SCE is filing this notice in this docket due to a statement set forth on slide 6 of the written materials used during the meeting and attached hereto as Exhibit A. Respectfully submitted, FADIA R. KHOURY RUSSELL A. ARCHER By: /s/ Russell A. Archer Russell A. Archer Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Russell.Archer@sce.com April 16,

4 Exhibit A SCE s Proposed TOU Periods

5 SCE s Proposed TOU Periods (2016 Rate Design Window - A ) April 2018 Ex A-1

6 Objectives Describe how SCE s proposed TOU periods align with California s GHG - reduction goals and previous Commission directives on establishing TOU periods Emphasize the need for an expeditious decision that is consistent with SCE s proposal 2 Ex A-2

7 SCE s TOU Period Proposal Aligns with California s GHG-Reduction Goals and CPUC Directives Appropriately set TOU periods support cost-effective long-term investment in the decarbonization¹ of California s electric system by providing accurate price signals to both customers (usage) and DER providers (supply) In D (TOU OIR decision), the Commission established that TOU periods should be based primarily on utility-specific marginal costs, and be sufficiently forward-looking to promote stability while allowing considerations for customer acceptability² SCE s TOU period proposal achieves these objectives Proposed TOU periods are based on SCE-specific marginal costs Forward-looking use of 2024 data supports both TOU period stability and accurate price signals for customers and DER providers considering long-term investments that support decarbonization (e.g., storage, EVs) Introduction of an extended super-off-peak (SOP) period helps address the curtailment of renewables (duck curve), as recognized by CAISO s recommendations, and decarbonization goals by providing a price signal to users and suppliers that is both actionable and stable As opposed to a more limited overlay (3 rd season) or event-based program Consistent TOU periods across the year and the continuation of SCE s existing two-season structure facilitate customer understanding and acceptance ¹California s GHG goals call for a 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions from 1990 levels by 2030 and an 80 percent reduction by ²See Policy Guideline Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 9 in D Ex A-3

8 SCE s TOU Period Proposal Addresses the CAISO Duck Curve Issues and Had the Broadest Level of Support Across Parties¹ SCE s proposal differs from the CAISO s recommendation primarily regarding a potential short spring season (3 rd season) in March and April The distinction between March/April and other winter season months may be shrinking as it is largely dependent on yearly hydro availability The implementation of a spring season that forward-looking cost data doesn t support increases the likelihood of more frequent TOU period changes SCE s recommendation of a two-season structure was shared by all parties,² and SCE has already defaulted nearly 400,000 residential customers onto rates consistent with our RDW proposal Thus far in 2018, pricing across January through March in the proposed Super Off- Peak period is fairly consistent. Proposed Super Period ¹SCE s proposed TOU periods were generally supported or not opposed by CLECA, CMTA, SBUA, CFBF and AECA. ORA concurred with SCE s seasonal definition with a one-hour difference in the peak period definition (i.e. 3-8 pm instead of 4-9 pm) while EUF recommended a 5-10 pm peak period. ²Certain parties recommended that different months comprise the two seasons, but still only proposed two seasons. 4 Ex A-4

9 The Implementation of SCE s Customer Service / Billing System (CSRP) Impacts SCE s Ability to Make Significant Changes to Its TOU Period Proposals SCE has repeatedly informed the Commission about SCE s Customer Service Re-Platform (CSRP) efforts and the associated timing and implementation constraints SCE agreed to consolidate its updated TOU period implementation with its 2018 GRC Phase 2 implementation (proposed for Q1 2019) per the request of parties, which effectively delayed the implementation of the new TOU periods until 2019 Given that the decision in the RDW is still pending, any deviation from SCE s TOU period proposal cannot be implemented until after CSRP is deployed which could result in an over two-year delay in providing proper price signals to customers and DER developers, exacerbating the State s duck curve issues 5 Ex A-5

10 Final Comments No need for 100% TOU consistency across IOUs. The TOU-OIR decision provided latitude for the TOU periods to vary across IOUs. PG&E s proposed peak periods are later than ours by an hour because they are further west than SCE. SDG&E has a significantly higher percentage of residential load than SCE. There ought to be consistency across customer groups within the same IOU jurisdiction to maximize customer understanding. The CPUC has already approved our Residential Pilot Default TOU rate structures and SCE has already migrated nearly 400,000 residential customers onto TOU rates that align with the proposals made in our RDW application. The only difference is that ½ of the residential customers were defaulted onto a narrower 5-8 pm peak period instead of a 4-9 pm peak period, otherwise the seasons and day type structures are the same. Other parties have already filed testimony in our 2018 GRC Phase 2 (A ) and SCE has already begun Settlement discussions under the presumption that our proposed TOU periods will be adopted. 6 Ex A-6

11 Appendix Ex A-7

12 CAISO and SCE Proposals Weekdays Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Spring Summer Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Weekends Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Summer CAISO: 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6a 7a 8a 9a 10a 11a 12a 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p 12p 9pm-Noon 9pm-Noon 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6a 7a 8a 9a 10a 11a 12a 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p 12p 9pm-Noon Super- 10am-4pm Noon-4pm Super- 10am-4pm Noon-4pm Super- 10am-4pm On-Peak On-Peak 9pm-Noon Weekdays Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Summer 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6a 7a 8a 9a 10a 11a 12a 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p 12p Weekends 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6a 7a 8a 9a 10a 11a 12a 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p 12p Jan Feb Super- Mar 9pm-8am 8am-4pm 9pm-8am Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 4p-9p Oct Super- Nov 9pm-8am 8am-4pm 9pm-8am Dec Summer SCE: 9pm-8am 9pm-8am Super- 8am-4pm Super- 8am-4pm On-Peak 9pm-8am 9pm-8am On-Peak* Weekdays Weekends * Summer: Jul-Aug Summer: Jul-Aug : Sept-Feb, May-Jun : Sept-Jun Super- Spring: Mar-Apr *On-Peak period is labeled "Super-Peak" and period is labeled "On-Peak" by CAISO On-Peak Super- Weekdays/Weekends Summer: Jun-Sept : Oct-May 8 Ex A-8

13 CAISO and SEIA Proposals CAISO: SEIA: Weekdays Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Spring Summer Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Weekends Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Summer 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6a 7a 8a 9a 10a 11a 12a 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p 12p 9pm-Noon 9pm-Noon 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6a 7a 8a 9a 10a 11a 12a 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p 12p 9pm-Noon Super- 10am-4pm Noon-4pm Super- 10am-4pm Noon-4pm Super- 10am-4pm On-Peak On-Peak 9pm-Noon On-Peak* Weekdays Weekends * Summer: Jul-Aug Summer: Jul-Aug : Sept-Feb, May-Jun : Sept-Jun Super- Spring: Mar-Apr *On-Peak period is labeled "Super-Peak" and period is labeled "On-Peak" by CAISO 9 Ex A-9

14 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION on all parties identified on the attached service list(s) A Service was effected by transmitting the copies via to ALJ Cooke and all parties who have provided an e- mail address, including those listed below. David Peck: Advisor to Commissioner Michael Picker (President) Commissioner Michael Picker (President) Ehren Seybert: Advisor to Commissioner Carla J. Peterman Commissioner Carla J. Peterman david.peck@cpuc.ca.gov Picker.Exparte@cpuc.ca.gov ehren.seybert@cpuc.ca.gov Peterman.Exparte@cpuc.ca.gov Executed this April 16, 2018, at Rosemead, California. /s/ Edith Leon Edith Leon Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770

15 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 1 of 6 4/16/2018 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: A EDISON - TO ESTABLIS FILER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: APRIL 12, 2018 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties MAX BAUMHEFNER DANIEL W. DOUGLASS NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL ATTORNEY ONLY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL ONLY, CA PARK GRANADA, STE. 209 FOR: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL CALABASAS, CA FOR: ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS AND DIRECT ACCESS CUSTOMER COALITION JANE LEE COLE, ESQ. VANESSA YOUNG SR. ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY LEGAL DIVISION 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. / PO BOX 800 ROOM 4107 ROSEMEAD, CA VAN NESS AVENUE FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CA (SCE) FOR: ORA HAYLEY GOODSON RITA M. LIOTTA STAFF ATTORNEY COUNSEL - DEPT OF THE NAVY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES 785 MARKET ST., STE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND SAN FRANCISCO, CA AVENUE OF THE PALMS, STE. 161 FOR: TURN SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES (FEA) JAMES BIRKELUND EVELYN KAHL PRESIDENT BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SMALL BUSINESS UTILITY ADVOCATES 55 SECOND STREET, SUITE MARKET STREET, SUITE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

16 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 2 of 6 4/16/2018 SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: SMALL BUSINESS UTILITY ADVOCATES (SBUA) FOR: ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION (EPUC) NORA E. SHERIFF EDWARD G. POOLE ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDERSON, DONOVAN & POOLE 55 SECOND STREET, SUITE CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1300 SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS FOR: WESTERN MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMM. ASSOCIATION ASSOC. JEANNE B. ARMSTRONG DANIEL DENEBEIM ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI & DAY LLP CALIF. CITY COUNTY STREET LIGHT ASSOC. 505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE SAN ANTONIO ROAD, SUITE 109 SAN FRANCISCO, CA PALO ALTO, CA FOR: SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION FOR: CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHT ASSOC. CAROLYN KEHREIN BRAD HEAVNER PRINCIPAL POLICY DIR. ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA SOLAR & STORAGE ASSOCIATION 2602 CELEBRATION WAY TH STREET, NO.820 WOODLAND, CA SACRAMENTO, CA FOR: ENERGY USERS FORUM FOR: CALIFORNIA SOLAR & STORAGE ASSOCIATION (CALSSA) F/K/A CALIFORNIA SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOC. (CALSEIA) LAURA TAYLOR MICHAEL BOCCADORO ATTORNEY PRESIDENT BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE, P.C. WEST COAST ADVISORS 915 L STREET, STE L STREET, SUITE 800 SACRAMENTO, CA SACRAMENTO, CA FOR: COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE STREET FOR: AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS LIGHTS ( CASL) ASSOCIATION (AECA) SCOTT BLAISING SCOTT BLAISING COUNSEL BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 915 L STREET, SUITE L STREET, SUITE 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA SACRAMENTO, CA FOR: CITY OF LANCASTER FOR: CALIFORNIA CHOICE ENERGY AUTHORITY ROBERT LIEBERT KAREN NORENE MILLS ATTORNEY ATTORNEY ELLISON SCHNEIDER HARRIS & DONLAN LLP CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE RIVER PLAZA DRIVE SACRAMENTO, CA SACRAMENTO, CA FOR: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & FOR: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION (CMTA) Information Only

17 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 3 of 6 4/16/2018 PAUL NELSON REGULATORY CLERK BARKOVICH & YAP BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE, PC ONLY ONLY ONLY, CA ONLY, CA FOR: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION RICK UMOFF MRW & ASSOCIATES, LLC COUNSEL & DIR - STATE AFFAIRS ONLY SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION ONLY, CA ONLY ONLY, CA BRANDON SMITHWOOD KAY DAVOODI MGR - CALIF STATE AFFAIRS UTILITY RATES & STUDIES OFFICE - US NAVY SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION 1322 PATTERSON AVE SE SUITE TH STREET, NW, SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, DC WASHINGTON, DC FOR: FEA LARRY ALLEN BLAKE ELDER UTILITY RATES & STUDIES OFFICE - US NAVY CLEAN ENERGY SPECIALIST 1322 PATTERSON AVE SE SUITE 1000 EQ RESEARCH WASHINGTON, CA HARRISON OAKS BLVD., STE. 100 FOR: FEA CARY, NC MAURICE BRUBAKER HUY TRAN BRUBAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. (BAI BRUBAKER & ASSOCIATES (FEA) PO BOX PO BOX ST LOUIS, MO ST. LOUIS, MO FOR: FEA CASE ADMINISTRATION ERIN PULGAR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 8631 RUSH STREET 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. ROSEMEAD, CA ROSEMEAD, CA FADIA RAFEEDIE KHOURY RAQUEL IPPOLITI DIR & MANAGING ATTORNEY PROJECT ANALYST SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. G.O.1, RM. 348H 2244 WANUT GROVE AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CA ROSEMED, CA RUSSELL A. ARCHER WALKER A. MATTHEWS III SR. ATTORNEY SENIOR ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. / PO BOX WALNUT GROVE AVENUE, ROOM 390 ROSEMEAD, CA ROSEMEAD, CA DAVID CHENG MICHAEL BROWN STAFF ATTORNEY CONSULTANT THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK EHRLICH â PLEDGER LAW, LLP TH AVENUE, SUITE 810 CALIFORNIA PLAZA SAN DIEGO, CA CALIFORNIA AVENUE, SUITE 223 BAKERSFIELD, CA

18 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 4 of 6 4/16/2018 FOR: SMALL BUSINESS UTILITY ADVOCATES (SBUA) SUE MARA LILLIAN RAFII CONSULTANT REGULATORY ATTORNEY RTO ADVISORS, LLC SMALL BUSINESS UTILITY ADVOCATES 164 SPRINGDALE WAY 548 MARKET ST. SUITE REDWOOD CITY, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA KATHERINE MORSONY MICHAEL ALCANTAR ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 55 SECOND STREET, SUITE SECOND STREET, SUITE 1700 SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION (EPUC) MIKE CADE BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 55 SECOND STREET, SUITE SECOND STREET, SUITE 1700 SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA BUCK ENDEMANN MARC KOLB ATTORNEY TESLA, INC. K&L GATES, LLP 3055 CLEARVIEW WAY FOUR EMBARCADERO, STE 1200 SAN MATEO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA ALISON LECHOWICZ BARBARA R. BARKOVICH PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT LECHOWICZ & TSENG MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS BARKOVICH & YAP, INC. PO BOX 3065 PO BOX OAKLAND, CA OAKLAND, CA FOR: CALIFORNIA STREETLIGHT ASSOC. FOR: CLECA CATHY YAP RACHEL BIRD BARKOVICH & YAP, INC. DIR - POLICY & BUS. DEVELOPMENT, WEST PO BOX BORREGO SOLAR SYSTEMS, INC. OAKLAND, CA ND STREET, SUITE 600 FOR: CLECA OAKLAND, CA R. THOMAS BEACH PHILLIP MULLER PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT PRESIDENT CROSSBORDER ENERGY SCD ENERGY SOLUTIONS TH ST., SUITE 213A 436 NOVA ALBION WAY BERKELEY, CA SAN RAFAEL, CA FOR: SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOC WILLIAM MARCUS BETH OLHASSO MCPM ECONOMICS WEST COAST ADVISORS 618 COURT ST., STE. C 925 L STREET, SUITE 800 WOODLAND, CA SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

19 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 5 of 6 4/16/2018 ANN L. TROWBRIDGE ANNE FALCON ATTORNEY SR. ASSOCIATE DAY CARTER & MURPHY LLP EES CONSULTING, INC AMERICAN RIVER DR., STE KIRKLAND WAY, NO. 100 SACRAMENTO, CA KIRKLAND, CA FOR: AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION (AECA) State Service MICHELLE COOKE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ONLY ONLY, CA BENJAMIN GUTIERREZ ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA CHRISTOPHER HOGAN DEXTER E. KHOURY ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM AREA ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA EHREN SEYBERT ERIC DURAN COMMISSIONER PETERMAN ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM ROOM 5303 ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA JUSTIN H. FONG LEE-WHEI TAN ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM AREA ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA LOUIS M. IRWIN MASOUD FOUDEH ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN ROOM 4209 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA MATTHEW A. KARLE NATHAN CHAU ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM ROOM 4108 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA PAUL S. PHILLIPS ROBERT LEVIN

20 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 6 of 6 4/16/2018 DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN ENERGY DIVISION AREA AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA BRIDGET SIEREN-SMITH DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 115 Sacramento, CA TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS