in dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

Transcription

1 SustAinABle living in dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

2 Imprint Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society This document is a result of the EU RP7 funded project Accelerating and Rescaling Transitions to Sustainability (ARTS). The project was implemented in cooperation with several partners (see bottom line) under the lead of the "Dutch Research Institute for Transition" (Drift). For more information Further information on the ARTS project and the other case study regions can be found on the project website and the project blog. Project website Project blog Authors Andreas Blum Markus Egermann Franziska Ehnert Kristin Reiß Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the many people from the Dresden transition initiatives in business, administration and civil society who were willing to participate in the project, for their fruitful and pleasant cooperation, and for the abundance of information from practical experience, without which this document could not have been produced. The project reports ( deliverables ) including those on other city regions and similar areas can be found here Cover image The cover image shows an abstracted representation of the outline of the urban area of the city of Dresden and the course of the River Elbe. Images on the cover: Gartennetzwerk Dresden, Sukuma arts e.v., Leibniz-Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung (IÖR) Design & Graphics Gesine Hildebrandt Contact person of the German research team Dr. Markus Egermann Leibniz-Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung Weberplatz Dresden m.egermann@ioer.de Dresden, in November

3 Inhalt 1. CHAPTER New ways of thinking, doing and organising 4 Who is this document for, and what are its aims? 4 Urban transition as a starting point for a fundamental shift 5 The ARTS project in Dresden 7 2. CHAPTER Situation and starting points in Dresden 9 Current dynamics of change in Dresden 9 Political concepts, strategies and processes (selection) CHAPTER Mechanisms of transformation 12 Upscaling 14 Professionalising 15 Replicating 16 Translating 21 Partnering 21 Instrumentalising 22 Embedding CHAPTER Building blocks for urban change 25 Recommendations for action for all urban change makers 25 Recommendations for action for urban policy and administration 27 Recommendations for action for urban transition initiatives 30 Appendix: Transition initiatives in Dresden 31 Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society in Dresden at a glance and to take away

4 You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. Richard Buckminster Fuller* 1. New ways of thinking, doing and organising * Unless otherwise explicitly indicated, quotations are taken from interviews and events which took place during the project. Who is this document for, and what are its aims? As a result of the three-year European research and cooperation project ARTS (Accelerating and Rescaling Transitions to Sustainability) and on the basis of numerous practical examples of innovative agency, this document aims to provide orientation points and building blocks for the development of Dresden as a future-oriented sustainable urban society. This document is aimed at all actors who are interested in making fundamental changes towards a sustainable development of the city region of Dresden, and want to shape and promote it. This includes actors from the city administration, local politics, civil society, business, science, as well as all the citizens of Dresden. The document has two specific aims: 1. It wants to create awareness of the various approaches for new ways of thinking, doing and organising geared towards sustainable development which have already been tested and implemented in Dresden through a wide range of initiatives in the sectors of business, administration and civil society, and 2. To point out building blocks for the further development and strengthening of such approaches and dynamics. 4 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

5 living well within ecological limits will require fundamental transitions in the systems of production and consumption, Such transitions will entail profound changes in dominant institutions, practices, technologies, policies, lifestyles and thinking. European Environment Agency Urban transition as a starting point for a fundamental shift The assumption that sustainable development needs to undergo profound changes in different areas is largely in agreement. A radical transformation towards a sustainable society as a response to a number of persistent problems confronting modern societies" 1. seems indispensable. In essence this involves the societal system changing its structures, cultures and practices" 2. Based on the theoretical approaches to what is known internationally as transition research, a fundamental change in society can be regarded as a sequence of profound transformation phases, which extend over a time period of 30 to 50 years. Four specific phases can be determined: the pre-development, take-off, acceleration and stabilisation phases 3. One can therefore speak of a transition when the entirety of the predominant ways of thinking, doing and organising have been changed to such a significant extent that we can speak of a new state of equilibrium. These changes often arise from niches of the society ( bottom up ): From innovative actors who challenge the norms of the social system ( regime ). For the theoretical background of the relationship between niche and regime and landscape, see the graphic and explanations on the next page. Our struggle for global sustainability will be won or lost in cities. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon 6 The local level is of tremendous importance for social change, as the dynamics of sustainability are spatially concentrated, particularly in cities and urban regions. Against the backdrop of the projected growth of the world s urban population to 6.5 billion people by 2050, the pressure on urban infrastructure (mobility, food, energy, etc.) and environmental impacts in particular will increase significantly. Cities thereby offer significant potential for innovation and can be seen as central nodes for the development of sustainable alternatives to problematic developments 4. The local level and particularly urban systems therefore constitute a suitable starting point for the investigation, as well as the initiation of dynamics for a transition to sustainability. Against this background, local initiatives of change towards sustainable development transition initiatives can be considered as core actors in the transition process. Transition initiatives are defined as locally-based actors from the public, private or civil society who want to promote a profound change in the ways of thinking, doing and organising, geared towards the sustainable environmentally-friendly development of the existing social 1 Grin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, New York: Routledge, Frantzeskaki, N., de Haan, N., (2009). Transitions: two steps from theory to policy. Futures 41, Brugge, R. van der & Rotmans, J. (2007). Towards Transition Management of European Water Resources. Water Resources Management, 21 (7), doi: s Wolfram, M. (2016). Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities, Current Research on Cities, 51, EEA (2015) The European environment state and outlook 2015: synthesis report, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen 6 UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (2015) at UN-Habitat Governing Council, Nairobi, Kenia 1. New ways of thinking, doing and organising 5

6 Socio-technical landscape Landscape developments put pressure on existing regime, which opens up, creating windows of opportunity for novelties. New regime influences landscape MARKETS, USER PREFERENCES TECHNOLOGY Socio-technical regime INDUSTRY CULTURE POLICY SCIENCE Socio-technical regime is dynamically stable. The different sub-systems form a routine constellation. External influences on niches (via expectations and networks). The changed regime finds to a new equilibrium. The subsystems form a modified constellation. New configuration breaks through, talking advantage of windows of opportunity. Adjustments occur in socio-technical regime. Niche-innovations Elements become aligned, and stabilize in a dominant design. Internal momentum increases. Small networks of actors support novelties on the basis of expectations and visions. Learning processes take place on multiple dimensions (co-construction). Efforts to link different elements in a seamless web. time The multilevel perspective on transitions The multi-level perspective is a transition research approach that describes the interplay of three analytical levels of social change: The Regime areferring to all prevailing forms of organisation, technological solutions, standards, norms, routines, ways of life, views, etc., divided into various sub-systems (politics, culture, economy, etc.) The socio-technical landscape, which represents the superordinate, so-called exogenous contextual conditions and developments, which influence the regime under consideration, but cannot be influenced by this or can be, but only with great difficulty. The niches of socio-technical innovation, in which innovations are conceived, developed and tested. With sufficient dynamics and target orientation, these innovative impulses can trigger a (gradual) change of the regime. They are usually favoured by windows of opportunity which are caused by disturbances to the regime e.g. by influences from the landscape of the contextual conditions. The model was originally developed with a view to socio-technical innovations. However, in principle, it is also a suitable starting point for a systematic view of socio-ecological innovations and social change. Text and graphic representation based on and modified from Geels, F.W., & Schot, J. (2007): Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36 (2007) Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

7 Urban societies, too, should discuss and agree common visions of the transformation process in a participatory manner, with each city codifying its vision in its own charter for urban transformation. WBGU German Advisory Council on Global Change (2016): Humanity on the move: Unlocking the transformative power of cities. Berlin: WBGU. system. According to the city-regional perspective, the focus is primarily on local development dynamics. Starting from an analysis of transition initiatives as catalysts for social change, the ARTS research project examines the resulting change dynamics in various European cities: Stockholm (Sweden), Brighton (United Kingdom), Genk (Belgium), Budapest (Hungary) and Dresden (Germany). Because the results of the research form the basis of this document, the project is briefly explained below. The ARTS project in Dresden Against a backdrop of socio-ecological challenges, such as the careful management of natural resources, the protection of biological diversity, climate change and food supply, a large number of local initiatives from civil society, city administrations and politics, as well as the local economy have been established in Dresden. These all strive in various ways to kick off and/or accelerate change which is geared towards sustainable development. They develop and test alternative ideas and approaches for environmentally-friendly practices and lifestyles. For the past three years, as part of the ARTS project, the Dresden-based Leibniz Institute of ecological urban and regional development has been examining the question of how social change can be influenced locally, and how alternative, sustainable structures, ways of thinking and ways of life can be established in Dresden. For this reason, the closest possible dialogue between experts and local actors had to be sought, following the transdisciplinary research approach. By means of surveys and a series of workshops, the project team systematically addressed the question of which mechanisms are relevant for local change. For this purpose, initiatives from the three sectors of business, administration and civil society, which are active in various subject areas such as food, mobility, resource conservation and nature conservation, as well as education and knowledge transfer were approached. The claims and recommendations included in this final document are mainly based on: the findings from 27 individual interviews with representatives from local initiatives and experts from the civil society, public and private business sectors, the results of the ARTS dialogue workshops with participants from civil society and the public and private business sectors 5 and expertise and good practice examples from the four other European project cities: Brighton (United Kingdom), Budapest (Hungary), Genk (Belgium) and Stockholm (Sweden). 5 The ARTS dialogue workshops involved a critical review of the research results from the interviews, a common investigation of innovative approaches and possibilities for the acceleration of social change using previously obtained results, as well as the identification of further research questions. 1. New ways of thinking, doing and organising 7

8 The following section provides an overview of the status quo of the actors, institutions and structures relating to sustainability in Dresden. Subsequently, the research results regarding various mechanisms for the distribution and promotion of new ways of thinking, doing and organising will be discussed. 8 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

9 There is nothing good, unless someone does it. Erich Kästner 2. Situation and starting points in Dresden Current dynamics of change in Dresden A sustainable development of the Dresden city region can build on several political concepts and strategies, and be tied in with ongoing processes (see the overview on page 11). In addition, the Dresden city region is home to a diverse landscape of initiatives (see the overview Fig. 1 on the next page). More than 100 transition initiatives could be identified (see the overview Transition initiatives in Dresden on page 31/32). These are predominantly led by civil society actors, but examples of innovative sustainable practices, cultures and structures can also be found in the business sector, as well as in the fields of city administration and local politics. Two generations of transition initiatives can essentially be identified: A 1st generation, which formed straight after the Reunification of Germany, and therefore has strong connections with the environmental and peace movements of the GDR; and a 2nd generation which has been recognisable since the early 2000s, which is more explicitly linked to the concept of sustainable development. The diverse initiatives are not very well-known to the general public, or to one another. An aim of this document is therefore to raise awareness of existing local approaches to change. The implementation of an overview map 2. Situation and starting points in Dresden 9

10 Education Fig. 1: Section of the Transition initiative themed city plan of Dresden. A comprehensive overview (in German) can be found at the end of the document. Energy Food in the themed city plan of Dresden ( hereby underlines that this document is meant as the initiation of a further ongoing process, rather than the conclusion of the ARTS project. Mobility Nature Conservation Resource management Built environment Cross-topic Regarding the various issues relating to sustainable development in Dresden, there are rather different dynamics in the fields of energy, mobility, and food, conservation of resources, nature conservation, as well as education and knowledge transfer. However, in comparison to other ARTS research areas (see above), the sectors of food and education have above-average representation by initiatives in Dresden. Through the example of the food sector, it can be demonstrated that a wide range of reference points for sustainability issues (e.g. conservation, biodiversity, community living, health, etc.) enables the involvement of various actors from different backgrounds. 10 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

11 Political concepts, strategies and processes (Selection) Since 1992 The City of Dresden is a member of the transnational network ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives Local Governments for Sustainability) and a signatory of the Charter of European Cities & Towns Towards Sustainability (Aalborg charter) www. sustainablecities.eu/the-aalborg-charter Since 1994 The City of Dresden is a member of the Climate Alliance leben/stadtportrait/europa/netz werke/05_klimabuendnis.php 2008 The City of Dresden: Living History Urban Cityscape: Dresden A Planning Model for the Inner-city : i.a. Internal Development Before External Development, Compact City, Urban City Centre and High-quality Green Areas, incorporating the objectivess of the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (2007); planen/stadtentwicklung/stadtplanung/ Planungsleitbild_Innenstadt.php 2010 Resolution of the City Council for a Solar City Dresden (SR/018/2010): cadastre of the potential space of rooftops for solar energy installations, innovation fund of the City of Dresden and the DREWAG (Stadtwerke Dresden GmbH), as well as the Photovoltaic Programme of the Sparkasse Dresden, the programme 500 Solar Roofs programme, Solar Package Dresden for private consumers Since 2010 Establishment of the Climate Protection Bureau: located in the Department of Environment and Local Economy as a horizontal organisational unit for climate protection in the city administration; welt/klima-und-energie/klimaschutz.php Since 2010 Environmental Talks of the City of Dresden: joint series of events held by the Environmental Agency of the City of Dresden and the Environmental Centre of Dresden (annually in November) umwelt/veranstaltungen/vier-elemente. php?shortcut=4elemente 2012 The City of Dresden: Integrated Energy and Climate Protection Concept of the City of Dresden 2030: Dresden is on-route to Becoming an Energy-Efficient City : inter alia, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, particularly of CO2, by ten percent every five years until 2030; umwelt/umwelt/klima-und-energie/klimaschutz.php 2008 to 2013 Development and Testing of an Integrated Regional Climate Adaptation Programme for the Model Region of Dresden (REGKLAM): Tackling Risks, Taking Chances the Region of Dresden Responds to Climate Change: Strategy Concept for an Integrated Climate Adaptation Drogramme for the Region of Dresden ; developed jointly by the Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, the Technical University Dresden, the Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg and the City of Dresden: ueber-regklam 2013 Integrated urban development concept Dresden s Future : guidelines for sustainable development; since 2010, citizen participation process the Dresden Debate conducted by the Urban Planning Authority; de/stadtraum/planen/stadtentwicklung/ stadtentwicklung/integrierte-stadtentwicklungsplanung.php 2014 The draft for the landscape plan incorporates the strategic notion of Dresden the Compact City in an Ecological Network stadtraum/umwelt/umwelt/landschafts plan/unterlagen_landschaftsplan.php 2005 to 2014 UN Decade Education for Sustainable Development : The City of Dresden is awarded the title City of the UN Decade (2013/2014): coordinated by the UNESCO Commission and supported by Federal Ministry of Education and Research; i.a. the exhibition Education for Sustainable Development organised by the Agenda 21; establishment of the Gymnasium Bürgerwiese as secondary school for education for sustainable development in 2009: bildung.dresden.de/ de/themenfelder.php 2015 to 2018 Vision and planning concept for a sustainable City of the Future Dresden : citizen participation process funded by the initiative Cities of the Future of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research possible continuation with project phase III: Implementation of Urban Laboratories from 2018 onwards. gesellschaft/buergebeteiligung/ 2. Situation and starting points in Dresden 11

12 Initiatives make needs become practical * 3. Mechanisms of transformation The basis of the empirical study in the ARTS project was a theoretical analysis framework, built on the concept of the transition research already cited (see page 6) ) and the resulting seven mechanisms for disseminating and promoting new ways of thinking, doing and organising: * Unless otherwise explicitly indicated, quotations are taken from interviews and events which took place during the project. Upscaling Upscaling is the growth of members, supporters or users of a single transition initiative in order to diffuse these new ways of thinking, doing and organising. Professionalising This mechanism describes the institutional development of transition initiatives in the field of tension between volunteering, creativity, reliability and professional organisation. 12 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

13 Replicating Replicating is the take-up of new ways of thinking, doing and organising of one transition initiative by another transition initiative or different actors in order to spread out these new ways. Translating This mechanism describes the translation and communication work between different system logics, world views and languages which is a frequent prerequisite for successful collaboration and network formation as well as the implementation thereof into existing structures. Partnering Partnering is the pooling and/or complementing of resources, competences, and capacities in order to exploit synergies to support and ensure the continuity of new ways of thinking, doing and organising. Instrumentalizing Instrumentalising is tapping into and capitalizing on opportunities provided by the multi-level governance context of the city-region in order to strengthen new ways of thinking, doing and organising locally. Embedding Embedding is the alignment of old and new ways of thinking, doing and organising in order to integrate them into city-regional governance patterns. In the following sections, the key results of the investigations for the Dresden city region are presented along these mechanisms. 3. Mechanisms of transformation 13

14 We are constantly growing; but is the growth concept the right one? How can we develop qualitatively, as well as in terms of quantitative upscaling? Growing together An example of the gradual co-evolution of associated practices, cultures and structures is the increase in ecological producers in the Dresden region. In 1991, the Consumer Cooperative for Environmentally Sound Products (VG) was established as a forerunner with a handful of agricultural suppliers of organic food; in the meantime, around 80 farms in the region are collaborating with VG and countless other retailers. Upscaling In Dresden, there are several examples of significant upscaling of initiatives in terms of initiators, members, users and/or supporters. A prime example is the consumer cooperative for products that have been produced in an environmentally-friendly way (VG), which is one of the largest consumer cooperatives in Germany. As well as opportunities, the upscaling of a transition initiative poses risks for city-regional change processes. Examples of opportunities include greater visibility, relief from work load due to the recruitment of new members and talent, as well as the emergence or strengthening of related initiatives and structures. Regarding related structures, the term co-evolution processes is also used if as an example the upscaling of a consumer cooperative is accompanied by upscaling on the part of the producers. Regarding the risks, however, there may also be competition between individual initiatives. Larger initiatives may gain predominance, and new, perhaps more radical, approaches may be hindered. The ambiguity of numerical upscaling is also apparent on the level of an individual initiative: Upscaling therefore typically leads to internal adaptation processes that lead to new group dynamics and hierarchies, but can also cause the dilution of previously action-guiding basic values (see point 2 Professionalising). Quantitative growth may also hinder or prevent any internal qualitative development, such as the reflection on, and further development of, the communicative cultures and structures of the cooperation. Examples of separation of individual persons or groups have been described, which sometimes even resulted in new start-ups if (former) colleagues could not, or did not want to, associate themselves with the array of potential changes brought about by the upscaling, such as the nature, organisational form or value orientation. From a city-region perspective, this must not be negative, as older transition initiatives may serve as the basis for new in some instances, further developed initiatives (see Replicating). An essential issue related to upscaling is the relationship between innovation and inclusion. To what extent is it possible to achieve quantitative upscaling and at the same time the integration of a wider spectrum of different people, without losing the original strength for renewal? Social transition as a process of making profound changes to unsustainable practices and structures requires pioneer initiatives, which develop and test innovations in protected niches. However, in the end, social transition must be based on a social consensus, and so it is necessary to take along as many different social groups as possible. Transition initiatives have different orientations that more or less focus on one of the two aspects. The openness of individual initiatives for inclusive collaboration is generally welcomed, but it is apparent that the aspiration to address and include as many parts of society as possible may fail for example, due to limited resources. In addition, innovative and penetrative practical power may be lost, as the consideration 14 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

15 and integration of many different ideas and concepts takes up the most time and energy. On a city level, it therefore seems reasonable to think about inclusion beyond the individual initiatives, and to rather support integration through the high diversity of the initiative landscape. If we consider the city as a whole, a large number of different initiatives also offer points of reference for different sources of motivation and the interests of individuals. This aspect also refers to the mechanism Replicating. In the networks, we can help each other, but we must not get side-tracked. Professionalising The work of transition initiatives for the development and dissemination of new ways of thinking, doing and organising includes very different tasks and areas of expertise. These include, for example, the relevant core technical, organisational or artistic activity, social and managerial skills, and public relations work including the recruitment of members, the application for funding, and project management. The issue of an appropriate and effective (internal) structure, as well as the professionalisation of the involved actors in terms of (self-)organisation, the allocation of responsibilities and tasks, efficiency and stringency, is therefore of great importance. However, these competences are usually acquired only with practical experience and on the principle of "trial and error", since the corresponding technical and organisational foundations are not always present, and are not systematically taught in conventional education. As a result, initiatives are generally successful, but the means of implementing usually does not follow routines, and, to the opposite, often is characterised by a certain amount of chaos. In this context, the importance of skills for dealing with group dynamics, including standard problems entailed by collective action with regard to relevant factors such as commitment, self-responsibility, inconsiderate reliance of members on more committed other members, or lack of sanction possibilities, have also been pointed out. It was also noted that in some cases, stronger orientation towards entrepreneurial voluntary services in the sense of distinct resistance and resilience, goal orientation and management skills could be helpful. However, a crash course in business may provide useful knowledge for a more efficient organisation for example, but it may be fundamentally contradictory to the ideals and logic of action especially those of civil society initiatives. On the whole, the tension between commitment/continuity and spontaneity/creativity became clear. Although many initiatives are not primarily interested in the creation of formal structures, and in spite of the claim that chaos can also be fun, the necessary learning processes can prove to be very tedious in the long run. This is especially problematic if the possibilities and time for self-reflection regarding personal aims, effects, procedures, organisational structures, etc. i.e. internal qualitative development (or qualitative upscaling) are limited, due to the pressure of everyday organisational tasks. On the other hand, too much professionalisation can lead to an unwanted effects of exclusion. A mixed model of business efficiency and voluntary openness could therefore 3. Mechanisms of transformation 15

16 prove to be ideal. Another possibility, especially for smaller or newer initiatives, is to take shelter, i.e. to engage organisational collaboration with other more strongly institutionalised partner initiatives. Naturally, we are inspired by other initiatives [...] We incorporate our experience as members of other initiatives into our work elsewhere, and vice versa Initiative needs space Sometimes, obstacles stand in the way of replicating an approach. For example, an essential prerequisite for transition initiatives is the availability of space for the implementation of the activities and services of the initiative. The community gardens, as well as bike and car-sharing models in Dresden can only be developed or replicated to the extent that suitable public or private space is available. Do-it-yourself initiatives, which extend Replicating The establishment of transition initiatives is frequently inspired by examples given elsewhere. Both complete concepts and individual strategies and elements of an approach are adopted and, where necessary, adjusted to the local framework conditions. Inspiration for the acquisition of promising or interesting approaches comes from the city region, but often also from outside it. As an example, the concept of repair cafés was adopted from the Netherlands. To this end, network initiatives and dedicated individuals are important nodal points for the replication of future-oriented sustainability approaches and initiatives. New ideas are introduced by these nodal points, especially through those in the city region, in the context of educational events or regular open meetings at which experiences are exchanged. The source of inspiration may also be (temporary) involvement in existing projects elsewhere. In some cases, an initiative is also formed on the basis of information relating to existing role models (e.g. in the media), without an explicit search being carried out beforehand. In addition, the documentation of existing examples and experiences or guidelines for action can distribute approaches more quickly, since this makes global knowledge available locally. An example of this is the starter kit of the network for community-supported agriculture (see the example box on page 24). The annual Umundu Festival can also be seen as a forum for the exchange of experience and an initiator of new start-ups. However, regarding change dynamics in the city region, it became clear that an increase in initiatives does not necessarily goes along with an increase in actively involved people. Indeed, in the case of the Dresden city region, there is the perception that the activities in the area of sustainability are essentially supported by a limited number of people who are already active, and who are at least partly involved in various initiatives. The work load experienced by these individuals has also been discussed accordingly. A core task within the framework of the transition towards sustainable development seems to be to expand the basis of local sustainability dynamics by means of measures to sensitise and activate wider social public. To this end, it is particularly important to provide sources of information which are easily accessible. beyond the narrow circle of initial members, to actors in the neighbourhood, hobbyists and families, artists and culture vultures, to businesses and manufacturers, make significant contributions in providing workshop premises, devices, experience and expertise, etc. continue on p Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

17 The following double page aims to disseminate and integrate the building blocks into your everyday life and field of activity. It gives an overview of all the mechanisms of urban regional change developed by the ARTS project as well as recommendations for action relating to Dresden, which have been derived from the research. It can be pulled out and can be quickly and easily stored in your folder, or pinned to the noticeboard in the city council/ city administration or association office, or on the wall of your initiative, or kept in your friend s pocket. It is indeed also possible to single out suitable building blocks. In each case: Have Fun!

18 BuIlDinG BlockS for change towards A SUstaInaBle urban SOciEty IN dresden 1 Improving the visibility, accessibility and experience of new sustainable practices; promoting awareness and commitment in the broader public 2 Existing municipal concepts and strategies for environmentally friendly and sustainable development continue to be developed and implemented 4 Development of educational strategies for the development of young talent in the field of sustainability professionalising 3 Art and culture are considered more strongly as means of communication regarding sustainability issues 5 Establishment of an interdisciplinary, crosssectoral contact point relating to the issue of sustainable development ( transition manager ) upscaling replicating 14 Reflecting on own requirements and capacities, respecting boundaries, sustaining achievements 13 Looking for win-win situations: Embedding new ways of thinking, doing and organising into existing processes and structures embedding instrumentalising partnering translating 6 Using existing city networks and profiting from the good ideas and practices of other cities 7 Long-term protection of physical experimentation spaces and meeting places in the city 8 Implementation of urban laboratories for the testing of sustainable ways of living and business practices 12 Development and professionalisation of organisational structures, activities and personal skills in transition initiatives; exploiting synergies 11 Orienting business development instruments more strongly towards the aims of sustainable development 10 Promoting institutional support and non-monetary support beyond project-related funding; supporting voluntary engagement on a regular basis 9 Enabling public awareness and debate relating to sustainable city development through suitable participation opportunities

19

20 A bridge builder sometimes has to be a physician and a communication expert at the same time. Translating Especially in terms of cooperation and networking, as well as implementation into existing structures, it became clear that translation and communication work is frequently necessary for understanding and bridge-building between various initiatives, actors from different thematic fields of work, and above all between the sectors of business, administration and civil society. This necessity is not caused due to a lack of unwillingness to communicate, but by various system logics of the fields, different world views and languages, as well as different ideas of how social change should be implemented. Translation work is currently carried out by just a few individuals who have (gained) knowledge of both parties, or by institutionalised networking structures (e.g. the foundation anstiftung & ertomis ). Barriers to such translation processes for the promotion of sustainable development arise both from the heterogeneity of the needs and target systems of the various transition initiatives (e.g. between the pre/post-reunification generations ), as well as the difficulties identifying the right point of contact or contact persons of the various parties (see also Embedding). Due to the considerable efforts, which in turn are not available for core business, translation efforts and the creation of interfaces are only invested in if there is at least some chance of success. Here, the prominent role of ambitious individuals involved ( transitioneurs ) becomes obvious, because they are able not only to strengthen and develop individual initiatives on the basis of particular motivation, backgrounds and experiences, but also to carry out additional tasks which are of central importance for the networking of initiatives on a city-regional basis and the mediation between the different sectors and milieus. Art can also play a special role in the building of bridges between different milieus and cultures. For example, as a lingua franca when content is conveyed visually or by miming, or by providing stumbling blocks which are not necessarily aimed at direct comprehension, but which provide an opportunity for shared reflection. Partnering All things considered, an increase in network activity is perceived. The underlying motivations and forms of cooperation are diverse and range from political alliances on the basis of common targets or ideals, to pragmatic collaborations for the procurement of material (money, premises, equipment) or intangible resources (experiences and knowledge). Content-related, geographical and ideological proximity facilitate collaboration. Networking and cooperation therefore seem to be easy to implement, especially within a particular sector (business, administration, civil society). An example of cross-sectoral collaboration is that of the cooperation of the Dresden Garden Network and the Green Space Office for the creation of urban gardens. Such collaborations also seem to be important for the implementation and embedding of sustainable practices (see Embedding). 3. Mechanisms of transformation 21

21 Networking needs occasions to cross each other s way In principle, personal contacts, shared experience and trust are important. In order to promote this, particularly dedicated people and independent networking initiatives are working to build bridges and to open communication facilities. This occurs, for example, as part of cooperative events, discussion platforms and initiatives that promote the gathering of different groups of actors. In particular, networking between social milieus, e.g. people with different (party-)political orientations, requires dedicated translation and communication work (see Translating). It was therefore pointed out by various interviewees that it was also important to overcome limits in the mind. The active search for shared issues and formats, the openness for collaboration with a wide range of actors, the awareness of synergy effects, and last but not least shared communication platforms, cultures and media can support disemination processes. Idealistic, organisational, social, institutional and geographical proximities should therefore be created and used between different actors for joint action. It was crucially noted that collaborations between different actors may pose a risk of being detrimental to individual collaboration partners, e.g. if compromises relating to the content of the original concept are required. Added to this is the fact that networking activities also involve resources which are often scarce. These are therefore no longer available for the core tasks of the initiatives. Networking activities can also lead to the overloading of individual actors. For example, it is not always possible to build alliances for the application for funding that could both increase the chances for success and at the same time reduce the competitive pressure (see the following section Instrumentalising). Instrumentalising Transition initiatives need a breeding ground on which they can grow and survive. Particularly relevant resources are time, skills, (political) climate, (physical) spaces, public attention, basic financing and networks. A key way of exploiting these resources is to identify and use relevant chances and windows of opportunity. The various state, spatial and organisation levels in different contexts are therefore navigated with a certain success: Foundations, networks and programmes from a local level, to a state and federal level, to the EU. However, this often demands a level of expertise that can only be reached at a high cost and, above all, expenditure of time. The expenditure in relation to the usefulness of efforts is therefore sometimes regarded as highly disproportionate. Collaboration can also be useful here (see also Partnering). Although details about funding opportunities are often shared reasonably quickly, the actual calls for proposals often lack transparency. In addition, there are few training or support programmes, if these are not organised by national networks, for example. Concerning the development of financial funding programmes, the associated risk of orientation towards involvement in comparatively short-term projects ( projectification ) is criticised. The 22 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

22 Particular opportunities In the past three years, many sustainability actors have taken advantage of the opportunities offered by the ARTS project, in order to exchange ideas and experiences relating to Dresden s sustainable urban society. In the future, there will be opportunities that support continued networking, and the reinforcement of transformative innovations. An example is the Future Cities project. As part of this project, specific ideas for the implementation of previously developed visions will be realised over the next eighteen months. Another example is the pending application of the City of Dresden to be a European Capital of Culture, which will facilitate several reference points for participation in, and active contribution to, the city in the sense of a culture of sustainability. foundation of this criticism is the experience that continuous work is made very difficult if resources are only available for a limited period. There is also the open question as to what extent funding can be at least partly used for the basic financing of voluntary involvement. In many cases, the activities of sustainability actors especially from civil society are based on forms of self-exploitation, which leave little space for activities that go beyond the core business content of the initiatives. In the case of sustainability-oriented private business sector actors, it is evident that they are often overloaded with operative business, and are therefore more economically independent on the one hand, but have very limited capacity to contribute to the overall dynamics of the city region on the other. A second important category, in addition to financial resources, is access to rooms and areas that can be used by the public. The economic pressure on the property market leads to a lack of space that would be affordable for typically less financially-strong and primarily voluntarily-organised initiatives. Civil society initiatives have been established in order to deal with this issue. They specifically pursue the issue of making urban areas and rooms available for initiatives, as well as enabling broader public perception, participation and involvement. The latter in particular points out that the provision of free space and experimental facilities should be regarded as an important public task for an innovative city society, which also would signal recognition and esteem of private commitments. In addition to the hedging of material resources, there are also immaterial requirements such as the creation of windows of opportunity for the broader discussion of sustainable development issues. For example, thematic discourses such as the Federal initiative on Future Cities, or the City of Dresden s application to become a European Capital of Culture in 2025, offer connectivity opportunities for Dresden s transition initiatives. Embedding In order to further promote a fundamental city-regional change process towards sustainability, the implementation of new ways of thinking, doing and organising into existing structures and routines plays and important role. In this context, two fundamentally different dynamics could be observed when implementing transformation processes: Fit-and-conform refers to the piecemeal adaptation of an initiative to existing system conditions, in order to make individual initiatives more compatible. One example would be formal organisation as an association, in order to be jointly represented as a legal entity (perhaps as a recipient of funding). On the other hand, stretchand-transform refers to the attempt to achieve a connection by changing the surrounding system, whereby the initiative itself remains unchanged. One example would be the development of new urban gardening concepts, which are currently being discussed by the allotments working group of the German Association of Cities and Towns. In addition to standard allotment forms, new kinds of ecological community gardens in cities should be con- 3. Mechanisms of transformation 23

23 Our success is built on lifeblood and business ideas. Sharing and sustaining knowledge Various networks and associations have merged, in order to sustain and share valuable knowledge and, for example, to develop templates, guidelines, or similar useful handouts for actors. As an example, the foundation anstiftung & ertomis provides useful tips for the first steps towards the construction of a community garden, the basics of association law, the founding of a limited company (ggmbh), or for public relations and communication. All of these are helpful suggestions for transition initiatives, with which both internal processes and formal structures, such as the legal structure, can be shaped. The network for community-supported agriculture, which supports the replication of community-supported farms (SoLaWi), also provides several consultation resources. These explain in detail, for example, the first steps of founding a SoLaWi, how to organise the gathering of bidders, and how to develop cultivation plans. The network also offers advice for farms. ceptually covered and in this way. Another example would be the involvement of initiatives into the conceptualisation of funding programmes. These dynamics can be triggered not only by the system, but also by the initiative. The two forms of the mechanism are often interrelated. Win-win situations are particularly beneficial for successful implementation, in which success is achieved by established actors, institutions and structures, as well as by the representatives of innovative sustainability initiatives. As an example urban gardens can be realised, because they not only provide vegetables to the gardeners involved, but also relieve the municipality of its duty to maintain public green spaces. Another example is the ÖKOPROFIT initiative of the local economy, which as its name suggests, integrates sustainability aspects such as resource management into conventional corporate management approaches and, in return, enables cost savings. The dynamics of implementation are therefore dependent on the existence of content-related, organisational and human interfaces, which currently can only occasionally be found in Dresden and which often focus on individual persons. This relationship is particularly difficult because of the often insufficient adaptability of the cross-sectional orientation of sustainable development issues and professional specialisations particularly in municipal administration, but also on the part of civil society transition initiatives. Because of this, it is often difficult to find the right contact person on the other side. A cross-sectoral, personal interface ( sustainability manager ) used by the city administration, and which previously existed in Dresden, was considered helpful. The Local Agenda 21 institution, which can be seen as a stretch-and-transform interface of the established system, could also play a helpful role. Essentially, it should be noted that it should not automatically be assumed that transition initiatives are aimed at making an impact on society. Many put themselves first. In both cases, however, change processes are possible, and the existence of various initiatives can be considered as value in its own right, regardless of their wider embedding. They create several points of reference for innovative thinking, action and community life, and therefore improve the chances of involvement and inclusion of various motivation and interest groups in a local transition process for sustainable development. Based on the key findings of ARTS, recommendations for action have been derived, which are aimed at different target groups. 24 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

24 In Dresden, there are many building blocks existing. However they must be made more adaptable to each other. 4. Building blocks for urban change Building on the results of the expert interviews and workshops in the Dresden city region as well as inspiration from the other city regions of the ARTS project (Brighton, Budapest, Genk and Stockholm), the following starting points and building blocks make the case for the orientation of the transition process towards a viable and sustainable city society. For easier orientation, the recommendations have been categorised according to the target groups addressed. However, this does not mean that the relevant groups of actors are solely responsible for the implementation. Recommendations for action for all urban change makers Improving the visibility, accessibility and experience of new sustainable practices of initiatives; promoting broader awareness and commitment In Dresden, there are over 100 active transition initiatives with a large number of members, users and supporters. In addition there are many individuals who, through their personal, everyday conduct such as the use of environmentally friendly means of transport are committed to a sustainable city society without being explicitly linked to a transition initiative. Nevertheless, in many fields of action, the citizens of Dresden still follow everyday routines rather than sustainable practices. Approaches to sustainable action must therefore be made even more visible. Existing formats, such as the competition or the Future Festival by Local Agenda 21, point Dresden in 4. Building blocks for urban change 25

25 When we get started, something happens; that results in great images, and the media love that the right direction. Further opportunities are provided by local and regional media partners (e.g. Sächsische Zeitung, Dresdner Neueste Nachrichten), digital platforms (e.g. Zukunftsstadtblog, ARTS-Blog, Transition Channel, neighbourhood groups), existing cooperation with cinemas in Dresden (e.g. SUKUMA Award, Stories of Change, film evenings), as well as the already existing themed city plan. It is important to ensure that everyone has a good everyday life, and that this is kept as local as possible. This requires close to everyday life interfaces, such as involvement in one of Dresden's more than 20 neighbourhood gardens. Existing municipal concepts and strategies for environmentally friendly and sustainable development continue to be developed and implemented For the City of Dresden, several reference points with which to ensure and promote sustainable living and business practices have already been formulated in municipal concepts and strategies. Page 11 offers an overview. Further examples are the Dresden 2030 & Beyond initiative from the business sector and the STADTCAMP Dresden initiative from civil society, which would contribute to a lively culture of debate and discussion in the city of Dresden. Regular reflections, examinations and development by all parties involved are worthwhile. It can therefore be helpful to combine documentation and information relating to sustainability in a central location, therefore making it easily available to the general public. It may also be a reasonable idea to offer versions of the documentation in simplified language. A transition manager (see point 5) could serve as an important interface between the local administration and the public. Art and culture to be considered more strongly as means of communication regarding sustainability issues Art and culture can serve as an unconventional means of communication, and as a language that is understandable on many levels, in order to promote sustainability and one s own work, thereby raising awareness and promoting commitment. In addition, art can create stumbling blocks which are not necessarily aimed at direct comprehension, but provide an opportunity for shared reflection. Existing Dresden-based approaches (e.g. work by SUKUMA ARTS e.v.) should be built on, and a wider circle of arts and culture vultures (e.g. OSTRALE, GEH8, etc.) should be formed in Dresden in the medium term. In particular, if the city of Dresden were to be a European Capital of Culture in 2025, it would need to establish aspects of necessary cultural change in terms of sustainable living and economic practices as part of its urban self-conception. Development of an educational strategy for the development of young talent in the field of sustainability Beyond the particular situation in Dresden, it is recommended that an educational strategy for the promotion of young talent in the field of sus- 26 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

26 Sometimes you just have to know about each other. That is a source of encouragement. tainability will be developed and that respective currently active projects will be promoted. Systemic change needs systemic knowledge, and therefore the promotion of skills not only for key actors in administration, civil society and businesses, but also for the wider public. This includes the integration of existing programmes and activities (e.g. junior theses, student exchanges with partner cities, personnel exchanges between innovative companies), schools (e.g. Gymnasium Bürgerwiese), education and transition initiatives (e.g. Anders Handeln e. V., Seitentriebe) and established scientific institutions (e.g. IÖR). A key element of a suitable strategy would also be to save and make available the existing transition knowledge available to, or obtained by, the initiatives (e.g. in the urban laboratories) by means of appropriate knowledge management. This task could take place in a competency centre (e.g. as part of the Future Cities project), or be taken care for by the transition team. Recommendations for action for urban policy and administration Transition manager and transition team : Establishment of a cross-sectoral contact point to sustainable development As a cross-sectional contact point for actors of a change geared towards sustainable development, the appointment of a transition manager ( sustainability officer ) with his/her own team is encouraged. This team will be based in the strategic department of the Lord Mayor, and will be engaged in all business areas of the local administration ( transition team ). The transition team can be contacted by the organised civil society, private sector innovators, and residents of Dresden. It also functions as a coordinating body for administrative tasks in the field of sustainability. As an interface used by the local administration and urban policy sectors, it provides relevant points of contact in specialist areas and municipal enterprises, and carries out cross-sectoral sustainability tasks. The transition team also helps actors in a sustainable development project to orient themselves towards the subsidy environment, to contribute to communal concepts and strategies, and to incorporate key topics and ideas which cannot be clearly assigned to any specific business area (e.g. food and health). Simultaneously, such In times in which a lot changes, it is important to have an all-round view an interface strengthens the culture of participation and enables citizens of Dresden to introduce their own innovative ideas. The transition team therefore carries out important translation work between the sectors (politics & administration, economy & science, and civil society). A sustainability budget called transition to sustainability is advisable for financing the work of the transition team. The establishment of such a transition team is also possible by way of strengthening the Local Agenda 21 process, particularly with regard to already close collaborative relations between the city administration and politics and municipal enterprises. 4. Building blocks for urban change 27

27 Sustainable development needs public urban space; not just public aisles between privatised bunkers. Profiting from the good ideas and practices of other cities Relevant city networks are a key source of sustainability-oriented inspiration. (Re)admission and strengthening participation, at least in terms of existing memberships, is worthwhile. An example is the ICLEI city network (see page 11). Existing collaborations with Dresden's partner cities should also be used for exchanges regarding sustainability approaches, e.g. as part of student exchanges. The increased use of Dresden's diverse scientific landscape, e.g. the active involvement of the city in national and European research projects relating to transition and sustainability, can also help to learn directly from other cities and regions. Protecting physical spaces for experimentation and meeting places in the city The availability of areas and rooms is prerequisite for the development and testing of innovative approaches. The protection of physical experimentation and meeting places in the city as public areas, as well as the provision of specific areas which are available for use by groups complying with transparent criteria is therefore an important contribution. In this context, temporarily usable urban areas are plausible, whereby the nature of the use is essentially kept open, in order to maintain possibilities for future developments and requirements. On the other hand, changes to the use of areas should also be deliberated, in order to secure the current involvement of socially and ecologically oriented initiatives on a long-term basis. These carry out important work in terms of social cohesion and sustainable development in the city, but cannot compete with financially strong investors on the urban property market. It would therefore be conceivable to secure and allocate urban areas on the basis of a holistic catalogue of criteria which, in addition to the economic dimension (in particular price), also includes the social and ecological aspects of future forms of use, as part of the allocation decision. The transition team (see point 5) could be responsible for the identification of the demand for the relevant rooms and areas. Implementation of urban laboratories for the testing of sustainable ways of living and business practices The implementation of urban laboratories is a broadly effective and activating project type. In this experimental environment, sustainable life and business practices can be tried and tested, on a cross-sectoral basis (administration, business, civil society, science), beyond the innovative niche (see the Sharing and sustaining knowledge box on page 24). In particular, it is about learning from actual changes of practice and existing routines. Related experiences and learning processes cannot be replaced by desk-based research, because many opportunities and obstacles for change can only be identified if they are tried and tested. Important knowledge, which can help to shape a shift towards sustainability, can therefore be generated. Examples are temporary changes to the urban area (e.g. car-free urban districts), the testing of regional, organic school meals in cooperation with community 28 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

28 supported farms and consumer communities, or the (re)use of part of the Elbe as a public swimming area (see e.g. Flussbad Berlin ). Urban laboratories could be co-financed by a sustainability budget (see above: Transition-Team ). It is also possible to combine funding with Saxon (SMWK/ SMI), national (BMBF/BMVI, e.g. Future Cities) and European (Horizon 2020) programmes and funding instruments. You need persons; institutions are hard to contact. You have to be willing to think that ideas are good, even if they come from others. Enabling public awareness and debate Opportunities for participation/involvement, for example in the Dresden Debate or the Future Cities project can help to raise awareness of issues relating to sustainable development, and to promote public discussion. Such formats need to be continued and strengthened, particularly in terms of the integration of the broader civil society. Adapting funding structures and supporting voluntary work on a regular basis Many initiatives have already successfully applied for funding at various levels to promote their projects, and to bring innovative impulses to the city. However, this often incurs considerable efforts and usually leads to a strong orientation of initiatives towards projects with limited time frames and uncertain future prospects ( projectification ). Support structures with longerterm time frames are therefore required. They should support initiatives by institutionalized grants, e.g. in a way similar to municipal cultural subsidies. On a local level, a Dresden in Transition competition could be held annually, in which Dresden-based transition initiatives from business, administration and civil society can apply for co-financing for their projects. Organisationally, such a competition can be considered as an upgrade of the existing Agenda 21 competition. Because a large proportion of the initiatives innovative work is carried out on a voluntary basis, it is important to ensure or increase the recognition and facilitation of individual voluntary involvement. For this reason, opportunities for the promotion of voluntary work on a municipal level should also be investigated. In principle, this does not have to be for financial support only. Specific support needs, such as support for public relations work or the provision of premises, should be requested in advance, so that targeted support services can be provided. Orienting business development instruments more strongly towards the aims of sustainable development The city region of Dresden also offers many good examples of social and ecological entrepreneurship. Economic development instruments could be used even more targeted, in order to promote those actors and groups whose business ideas strengthen the community and social cohesion, and act in an ecologically sustainable way. The corresponding coordination could be under the responsibility of the transition team (see point 5). 4. Building blocks for urban change 29

29 Recommendations for action for urban transition initiatives It is fun, it is tasty, it s a social experience this can be better than funding. Development and professionalisation of own organisational structures, activities and personal skills; exploiting synergies Supervision and mentoring for local transition initiatives by suitable institutions or actors (e.g. with practical knowledge in a specific context) can be helpful in the evaluation, further development and professionalisation of their own organisational structures, tasks and personal abilities. Although creative chaos can be a breeding ground for innovation, formal organisational structures can make day-to-day business considerably easier. A mixed model of business efficiency and the openness of volunteers could therefore prove to be ideal. It is also important to examine the possibilities for the coordination of activities and the overlapping use of the existing skills of various parties and networks (such as Umweltzentrum, Lokale Agenda 21, Dresden im Wandel, Umundu-Festival, Gartennetzwerk, Ökoprofit, etc.) and to utilise possible synergies. Initiatives have to find a path from ringing the alarm bell to dialogue. Embedding new ways of thinking, doing and organising into existing processes and structures Innovative pioneering work is not the only important means of establishing new ways of thinking, doing and organising with which to promote sustainable development. It is also necessary to link these as closely as possible to or to ideally to integrate them into established processes, structures and action routines in the city society. An existing example is that of the aha anders handeln e. V., which conveys sustainability-oriented knowledge in regular school classes during the project weeks. Collaborations between initiatives from the food sector and providers of school meals, canteens or student union cafeterias are also possible. The sustainable procurement (fair trade) in public administration institutions and commercial enterprises would have to be addressed. Embedding into existing processes and structures also improves visibility and accessibility for people outside existing circles of sustainable action, and can help to increase the circle of those involved beyond insiders. Reflecting on own requirements and capacities, respecting boundaries, sustaining achievements Many committed people and groups, with all their enthusiasm, are facing a personal overload. In terms of individual initiatives and people, it is therefore important to reflect personal boundaries and requirements, so as not to overburden. Considering the temporal dimension of transition processes, the durability and stability of involvement is at least as important as the shortterm effects. As well as developing and testing new ways of thinking, doing and organising, the sustainability of the progress achieved must be kept in mind. 30 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

30 Transition Initiatives in Dresden* Education Arbeitskreis Entwicklungshilfe e. V., Bildungsstelle Globales Lernen, Dia- Projekte, Dresdner Umweltgespräche, Dresdner Waldkindergarten, Freie Alternativschule Dresden, Freie Umweltoberschule Dresden, Gymnasium Bürgerwiese, IHK Dresden-Umwelt, Jugend-Öko-Haus, Junges Gemüse, Kinder- und Jugendbauernhof Nickern e. V., Kinderhaus Cocolores e. V., Natur- und Umweltschule Dresden, Sachsen im Klimawandel, Sächsische Bildungsgesellschaft für Umweltschutz und Chemieberufe Dresden mbh, Seitentriebe, Stadtökologischer Erlebnispfad, StuRa HTW Dresden Bereich Ökologie, Sukuma arts e. V., Sukuma Award, TU-Umweltinitiative (TUUWI), Umundu-Festival Dresden Energy Ampere Solar, Brockmann Solar, Bürgerkraftwerk, CloudandHeat, DREWAG Grüner Strom für Dresden, DREWAG Innovationsfonds, Energiegenossenschaft Neue Energien Ostsachsen eg (egneos), Energiehaus Dresden, Energie portal Sachsen, Energie-Solar-Beratung Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Stephan Mücke, Kallweit Solartechnik, Klimaschutzstab Dresden, Ökoprofit Dresden, saena Sächsische Energieagentur, Solargemeinde e. V., Solarsysteme Sachsen, Solarwatt, SunStrom Food deinhof Solidarische Gemüsekooperative Dresden, Der schnelle Josef, GartenNetzwerk Dresden, Gesundheitsstammtisch Dresden, Grüntal Mitgliederladen Dresdner Neustadt, Hof Mahlitzsch, Kinderküche Dresden, Kolle-Mate, Kräutergarten Zum Grünen Heinrich, Solidarische Landwirtschaft Schellehof, Tag2Bäckerei, Verbrauchergemeinschaft für umweltgerecht erzeugte Produkte (VG), Vorwerk Podemus, Walther's Säfte Mobility ADFC-Fahrradstadtplan, Carl und Carla, DVB CarGoTram, DVB JobTicket, DVB Semesterticket, Fahrradselbsthilfewerkstatt Radi.O., Flinkster, Mein Car Sharing, SZ-Bike, Teilauto Dresden * Status: 2016 Transition Initiatives in Dresden* 31

31 Nature Conservation BUND Regionalgruppe Dresden, CityTree, Grüne-Liga-Projekt Streuobstwiesen, Hufewiesen Trachau e. V., Igeltour Dresden, NABU Naturbewahrung Dresden e. V., NABU Regionalverband Meißen-Dresden, NSI Naturschutzinstitut Dresden, Ökologisches Großprojekt Dresden Coschütz/ Gittersee, Regionalgruppe Natur- und Umweltschutz Dresden, Tag der Stadtnatur, Wildvogelauffangstation des Dresdner Umweltzentrums Resource Management Denk an deinen Beutel, Lose Laden Dresden, Naturlampen Dresden, Nordwerk Recycling Design, radschlag e. V., Repair Café Johannstadt, Repair Café Löbtau, Umsonstladen Dresden, Werk.Stadt.Laden Built Environment Allianz für Dresden für eine bunte Leipziger Vorstadt, Architekten-Gemeinschaft Reiter & Rentzsch, Architekturbüro Johannes Buck, bauforum dresden e. V., hb architektur, Ingenieurbüro Dr. Scheffler & Partner GmbH, Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept Stadt Dresden (INSEK), JOE Ingenieure GmbH, Netzwerk Neues Wohnen (NWID), Ökowert PlanProjekt GmbH & Co. KG, Pro Dresden: Planungsgesellschaft für Raumordnung & Ökologie Cross-topic #Rosenwerk, Apfelgarten, BibeZu ggmbh, Biene sucht Blüte, Bürgerstiftung Dresden, Casabunta e. V., Columbusgarten, Dresden im Wandel (Transition Town Dresden), Dresdner Stiftung Soziales & Umwelt der Ostsächsischen Sparkasse Dresden, elbtaler Regionalwährung, Entwicklungspolitisches Netzwerk Sachsen e. V., Evoluzzer, FabLab Dresden, Freiraum Elbtal e. V., Gemeinschaftsgarten Aprikosen für alle, Gemeinschaftsgarten Johannstadt, Grüne Liga Sachsen e. V., Hang zum Grünen, HausHalten Dresden e. V., HdK Dresden e. V., Heinrichsgarten, Hensels Garten, HTW Dresden Sustainable Campus, IG Freiräume, INKOTA Regionalstelle Sachsen, Internationale Gärten Dresden e. V., K-52, Karreegarten an der Elbe, Kleiner Garten Strehlen, Kommunalforum für Wirtschaft und Arbeit, KonsumGlobal Dresden, Kunet e. V., Laden- Cafe Aha GmbH, Lokale Agenda 21 für Dresden e. V., mobiler Gemeinschaftsgarten hechtgruen, Öase Marsdorf, Ökologisches Kinderhaus, Ökumenisches Informationszentrum, Omse e. V., Postfossile Zukunft, Quartier Friedrichstadt, Quilombo e. V., Regionale Entwicklung Elbland Forum, Riesa Efau Dresden, Sächsische Landesstiftung für Natur und Umwelt, Selbstversorgungsgarten, Stadtentwässerung Dresden, Tauschring Dresden e. V., UFER-Projekte Dresden e. V., Umweltzentrum Dresden 32 Sustainable living in Dresden Building blocks for change towards a sustainable urban society

32 Inhalt 33