Particle Identification. N. Baltzell CLAS12 Ready for Science Review September 25, 2017

Similar documents
Event Builder. N. Baltzell CLAS Collaboration Meeting March 7, 2018

CLAS12 First Experiment Workshop Report

The LHCb trigger system

DAQ & Electronics for the CW Beam at Jefferson Lab

The Run-2 ATLAS. ATLAS Trigger System: Design, Performance and Plans

Real-time flavour tagging selection in ATLAS. Lidija Živković, Insttut of Physics, Belgrade

LHCb Trigger System and selection for Bs->J/Ψ(ee)φ(KK)

The LHCb Upgrade BEACH Simon Akar on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

Hall B:User Experience and Utilization

Detector Checkout and Optics Commissioning

LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating Pad Detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring

Data acquisi*on and Trigger - Trigger -

The MUSE experiment. Technical Overview. Guy Ron (for the MUSE collaboration) Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Central Neutron Detector: settings/calibrations/performances. P. Chatagnon, S. Niccolai, R. Wang IPN Orsay CLAS12 workshop - 3/6/2018

Lecture 11. Complex Detector Systems

Muon Collider background rejection in ILCroot Si VXD and Tracker detectors

Trigger and Data Acquisition Systems. Monika Wielers RAL. Lecture 3. Trigger. Trigger, Nov 2,

Upgrade tracking with the UT Hits

CMS electron and _ photon performance at s = 13 TeV. Francesco Micheli on behalf of CMS Collaboration

3.1 Introduction, design of HERA B

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 12 Nov 2010

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Noise Characteristics Of The KPiX ASIC Readout Chip

HERA-B RICH. Samo Korpar

LHCb Trigger & DAQ Design technology and performance. Mika Vesterinen ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop 8/10/2016

The LHCb trigger system: performance and outlook

optimal hermeticity to reduce backgrounds in missing energy channels, especially to veto two-photon induced events.

AMS a cosmic ray experiment in the ISS

LHC Experiments - Trigger, Data-taking and Computing

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. CMS detector performance.

Physics at the LHC and Beyond Quy Nhon, Aug 10-17, The LHCb Upgrades. Olaf Steinkamp. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.

CALICE Software. Data handling, prototype reconstruction, and physics analysis. Niels Meyer, DESY DESY DV Seminar June 29, 2009

HPS ECal & Trigger Simulation. HPS Collaboration Meeting.

Hall D Report. E.Chudakov 1. PAC43, July Hall D Group Leader. E.Chudakov PAC43, July 2015 Hall D Report 1

The Run-2 ATLAS Trigger System

Trigger and Data Acquisition (DAQ)

Track Triggers for ATLAS

Trigger and data acquisition

Beauty Experiments at the LHC

Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in Run I and Upgrades for Run II

First-level trigger systems at LHC. Nick Ellis EP Division, CERN, Geneva

Proximity focusing RICH with flat pannel PMTs as photon detector

Development of a Highly Selective First-Level Muon Trigger for ATLAS at HL-LHC Exploiting Precision Muon Drift-Tube Data

The NA62 rare kaon decay experiment Photon Veto System

8.882 LHC Physics. Detectors: Muons. [Lecture 11, March 11, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)476. The CMS Tracker upgrade for HL-LHC. Sudha Ahuja on behalf of the CMS Collaboration

Mitigating high energy anomalous signals in the CMS barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter

Status of the LHCb Experiment

HPS Upgrade Proposal

The DIRC-like TOF : a time-of-flight Cherenkov detector for particle identification at SuperB

DHCAL Prototype Construction José Repond Argonne National Laboratory

Operation and Performance of the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter and Level-1 Topological Triggers in Run 2 at the LHC

VELO: the LHCb Vertex Detector

The Commissioning of the ATLAS Pixel Detector

AMS-02 Anticounter. Philip von Doetinchem I. Physics Institute B, RWTH Aachen Bad Honnef, August 2007

Absolute Photon Flux Measurement at the BGO-OD-Experiment

The upgrade of the LHCb trigger for Run III

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Particle identification at Belle-II

CLAS12 FTOF Panel-1a and Panel-2 Refurbishment and Baseline Test Results

CERN Experiment. CERN-RO ISAB Meeting, November 2015, IFA Măgurele. Alexandru Mario Bragadireanu, Particle Physics Department, IFIN-HH Măgurele

Going TOPSiDE at the EIC

Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Pixel Detector

Some Studies on ILC Calorimetry

The design and performance of the ATLAS jet trigger

Status of the LHCb experiment

itop System Overview Kurtis Nishimura University of Hawaii October 12, 2012 US Belle II Firmware Review

CMS Paper. Performance of CMS Muon Reconstruction in Cosmic-Ray Events. arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 29 Jan The CMS Collaboration

Attilio Andreazza INFN and Università di Milano for the ATLAS Collaboration The ATLAS Pixel Detector Efficiency Resolution Detector properties

Studies of Jet-Track Correlations in PbPb collisions with CMS

Monte Carlo truth in the ATLAS detector simulation programs. A. Dell Acqua

CMS Silicon Strip Tracker: Operation and Performance

BaBar and PEP II. Physics

Overview of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ System

The Muon Pretrigger System of the HERA-B Experiment

TRIGGER & DATA ACQUISITION. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

First-level trigger systems at LHC

Contents. The AMADEUS experiment at the DAFNE collider. The AMADEUS trigger. SiPM characterization and lab tests

Properties of Injection-molding Plastic Scinillator for Fiber Readout

The CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System

What do the experiments want?

PoS(LHCP2018)031. ATLAS Forward Proton Detector

Muons & Particle ID. Muon/PID Studies

Cosmic Rays in MoNA. Eric Johnson 8/08/03

Machine learning and parallelism in the reconstruction of LHCb and its upgrade

Status of Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter (SDHCAL)

Seminar. BELLE II Particle Identification Detector and readout system. Andrej Seljak advisor: Prof. Samo Korpar October 2010

The Muon Detector Update

The HERA-B Ring Imaging Cerenkov ˇ Detector

Overall Design Considerations for a Detector System at HIEPA

Update on ITS PID and SDD calibration

Beam Condition Monitors and a Luminometer Based on Diamond Sensors

Timing Measurement in the CALICE Analogue Hadronic Calorimeter.

Contents. Why waveform? Waveform digitizer : Domino Ring Sampler CEX Beam test autumn 04. Summary

Streaming Readout for EIC Experiments

Tracking and Alignment in the CMS detector

The CMS Muon Detector

The LHCb VELO Upgrade

Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4. Final design and pre-production.

A MAPS-based readout for a Tera-Pixel electromagnetic calorimeter at the ILC

Transcription:

Particle Identification N. Baltzell CLAS12 Ready for Science Review September 25, 2017 1

Event Builder Overview The last CLAS12 service run, after all detectors reconstructions Retrieve event-based quantities, e.g. RF, heliticy, live-time Associate detector responses to create particles Forward Detectors, Central Detector, Forward Tagger Define event start time based on CLAS12 and RF Perform particle identification Provide all info in high level CLAS12 data banks 2

Creating Particles Charged particles: associate detector responses with tracks based on geometric matching Currently loose, flat detector-dependent cuts on DOCA between track and detector hit FTOF1B DOCA (cm) PCAL DOCA (cm) Identify trackless ECAL hits as neutrals, assume straight trajectory, and associate with other detectors unmatched hits based on geometric matching Matching quality (normalized distance) reported in output ForwardTagger and CentralDetector matching is already done in their dedicated recon services 3

Event Start Time Choose Trigger Particle Prefer highest energy electron, if one exists, requiring ECAL sampling fraction HTCC nphe FTOF response Else highest energy track with FTOF assumed a π else photons to be implemented Construct particle s vertex time and calibrated RF TDC signal to identify start time as nearest RF bunch time at vertex 4

Particle Identification (1) If HTCC nphe + ECAL Sampling Fraction à e+/e Else it s a hadron: Best hypothesis based on minimizing time difference between event start time t0 and vertex time ti = t0 tf T OF ECAL Energy After choosing event start time, identify other charged particles with a simple cut-based logic L, i = /K/p/d/... i (p) Momentum Possible overrides from Cerenkov e.g. kaon hypothesis gives best timing, but hit in LTCC and below kaon threshold à reassign to π PID χ2 reported in output (currently just as Δt) Planned to extend to more sophisticated scheme, e.g. likelihood Beta FTOF 1B Momentum 5

Particle Identification (2) Using test suite to check progress clas12-offline-software/ validation! test files automatically downloaded from webserver reconstructed & analyzed to perform data sanity checks yields, efficiency / misidentification 2-parJcle test events electron + another, in different sectors φ midesctor ± 10 15 < θ < 35 e - : 1-9 GeV other : 1-4.5 GeV Clas12FastMC at generator level to ensure trajectories intersect all detectors i.e. account for B-fields, acceptance also FT/CD events starting to be used Neutron / photon separation unfinished; currently based only on ECAL topology, timing-based separation to be implemented. Forward Detectors P I D (%) e 98 Truth e π K p γn π 80 14 4 K 7 63 1 p 4 5 90 γn 98 A rough efficiency based on 1K events for each, averaged over given kinema:cs, used to help track EB so?ware development. For e / hadrons, demoninator requires a track; any other detector/reconstruc:on inefficiencies, kaon decay, etc, are absorbed. 6

Event Builder REC Bank Structures High level banks for analysis REC::Event! run/event #, helicity, event time, live time, faraday cup charge, etc REC::Particle REC:: ResponseType! e.g. Calorimeter, Scintillator, Cerenkov! contains index pointers to REC::Particle! lower-level detector banks REC::Trajectory, REC::TBCovMat, REC::VertDOCA, etc. 7

CCDB Most Event Builder parameters are already stored in CCDB, e.g. calorimeter sampling fractions position/time matching resolutions various cut values EB service loading them from CCDB, but not in full use yet; adoption in progress 8

Summary Event Builder framework status Trigger Particle / Start Time currently electron-focused, to be extended to π/ɣ Particle Identification currently simple cut-based algorithm with single PID FD algorithms developed and well-tested Forward Tagger incorporated, Central Detector partial Validation/testing suite in use checking yields, efficiencies/misidentification, data sanity checks CCDB structure and codes for Event Builder exists, adoption in progress Output bank structure defined and mostly populated Central Detector Import CD matching (already performed) into REC::Particle/Tracks/ Scintillator banks Apply timing-based hadron identification, and CVT-Veto for neutrals Read helicity into REC::Event Treat CD/FD overlaps Include ECAL timing for n/γ separation Incorporate RICH Extend cut-based PID scheme to likelihood/quality estimator Future Work Devs: Joseph Newton (ODU), Nathan, Raffaella Framework design by Gagik Gavalian 9