Raging River Quarry. Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016

Similar documents
Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, October 08, 2012

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, January 14, 2013

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, December 31, 2012

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Children's Center Noise Monitoring Monday, June 17, 2013

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Offaly County Council

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF APRIL 29, 2013 MAY 05, 2013)

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING AUGUST 2014

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF NOVEMBER 25, 2013 DECEMBER 01, 2013)

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

Roche Ireland Limited

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JUNE 30, 2014 JULY 06, 2014)

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

Terms of Reference of Aircraft Noise at IGI Airport, New Delhi

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

Roche Ireland Limited

CHECKLIST PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

CITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET

Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica

City of Hamilton INFORMATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT

Environmental Noise Assessment Pa ia Relief Route Project Pa ia, Maui County, Hawaii

CITY OF DES MOINES, IA PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 602 Robert D Ray Drive Des Moines, IA Phone:

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Rezoning/OCP Amendment Application. Current OCP Designation. Proposed OCP Designation

Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JANUARY 27, 2014 FEBRUARY 2, 2014)

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING JULY 2013

Appendix B: Noise Study

SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).

Attachment A. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:

Minor Site Plan Review Process

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: May 4, 2015

Procedure Mining Two Way Radio Usage (Surface)

Statement of Evidence of N I Hegley

# Insite RE Inc./ Verizon Wireless Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels 1

WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305

CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

CORRECTION NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2009 (ACT NO. 13 OF 2009)

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Chapter 15

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

Soltec (Ireland) Limited Mullingar Business Park, Mullingar, Co Westmeath. Annual Noise Report

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION

Site Plan Review Application. Interest in the Property (e.g. fee simple, land option, etc.)

CALGA SAND QUARRY ATTENDED COMPLIANCE NOISE MONITORING 12 APRIL 2017 REPORT NO E VERSION A APRIL 2017 PREPARED FOR

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

Subject: Ambient Noise Measurement, Creekside Park Project, Monte Rio, California

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

SECTION 35 ANTENNAS AND TOWERS

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

Small craft -Measurement of sound pressure level of airborne sound emitted by powered recreational craft

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Compliance Noise Survey & Assessment

DEP 2008 ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 11 August Doc no QM-RP-1-0

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: May 4, 2015

Engineering a Sustainable Future for Our Environment

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction. See the Implementation Plan for PRC

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction

CITY OF EL MIRAGE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCESS

Liddell Coal Operations

Assessing the accuracy of directional real-time noise monitoring systems

Conceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City

ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Information

Transcription:

Raging River Quarry Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016 Introduction The Raging River Quarry operates in unincorporated King County, near Fall City, Washington. King County issued a series of stop work orders for the Raging River Quarry, which began on June 9, 2016. Subsequent noise monitoring data was provided to the County that indicated individual activities could comply with the King County noise limits, and the County amended its stop work orders to allow the quarry to conduct these activities separately. The activities to be tested are included as an attachment to this protocol. Raging River Quarry is requesting to be allowed to conduct full operations for a one-month period to allow for noise monitoring and identification and application of noise mitigation, if necessary, to enable full operations of the facility to comply with the County noise limits. This noise monitoring protocol is being presented to King County to identify the required elements of the noise monitoring program during this provisional one-month period. Applicable Regulations The site and surrounding properties are located in unincorporated King County and are subject to the noise limits outlined in Chapter 12.86 of the King County Code (KCC 12.86). KCC 12.86 establishes maximum permissible sound levels based on the district (i.e., zoning) of the noise source and the receiving properties. The quarry is zoned M for Mining and is considered an Industrial district. The surrounding properties are zoned for rural residential use (RA-10) and are considered Rural Districts. The applicable noise limits for noise sources located in Industrial Districts are displayed in Table 1. Table 1. King County Maximum Permissible Sound Levels (dba) District of Sound Source District of Receiving Property Within King County Rural Residential Commercial Industrial Day/Night Day/Night Industrial 57 / 47 60 / 50 65 70 The limitations for noise received in Rural and Residential Districts are reduced by 10 dba between 7 AM and 10 PM weekdays and between 9 AM and 10 PM weekends. Source: KCC 12.86.110 Ramboll Environ 19020 33rd Avenue West, Suite 310, Lynnwood, WA 98036 V +1 425.412.1800 F +1 425.412.1840 www.ramboll-environ.com

Raging River Quarry November 30, 2016 Noise Monitoring Protocol Page 2 The sound level limits identified in Table 1 are based on the energy-average sound level over a given time period, or Leq. In addition, the sound level cannot exceed a level 15 dba higher than the levels displayed in Table 1, represented by the Lmax or maximum sound level. KCC 12.86.110(A) states that sound level measurements shall be taken for a minimum of one-minute for constant sound sources (i.e., sources that emit a constant sound that would not change over a given time period), and a minimum of thirty minutes for non-continuous sound sources (i.e., sources that are not continuous over a given time period). Given the varying nature of quarry noise, the appropriate time interval for the measurement would be a minimum period of thirty minutes. Instrumentation Sound levels shall be measured using Class I or Class II (previously referred to as Type 1 or Type 2) sound level meters. Class 1 meters are generally considered to be accurate within +/- 1 dba while Class 2 meters are generally considered to be accurate within +/- 2 dba. The microphone of each sound level meter will be mounted on a tripod at a height of approximately 5 feet above ground, and the microphone will be fitted with an acoustically neutral windscreen. The sound level meter will be calibrated immediately before the measurements begin, and the meter must have been factory calibrated and certified within the previous 12 months. The meter will be set to a Fast response and A-weighting. Locations Sound levels shall be measured at three locations representing the adjacent properties to the quarry site. The locations are expected to be the following: Location 1 on the southeast boundary of the McClain property and the Raging River Quarry property Location 2 on the northern boundary of the Shimmel property (formerly known as the Johnson property), near the log pile on the Trisko property Location 3 on the northern boundary of the Shimmel property (formerly known as the Johnson property), east of Location 2. The previous locations represent the most-affected portions of the most-affected adjacent properties. Sound levels of quarry operations at other properties in the vicinity of the quarry are expected to be similar to or lower than the levels at these chosen measurement locations. Frequency of Measurements During the month-long period, sound level measurements will be taken a minimum of once per week. If analysis of the measurement data indicates that the quarry was not in compliance with the noise limits during the weekly monitoring event, the specific activity causing the elevated sound levels will cease until noise mitigation can be identified and implemented. If the activity restarts prior to the next scheduled monitoring event the following week, a spot test will be conducted upon

Raging River Quarry November 30, 2016 Noise Monitoring Protocol Page 3 start-up of the activity to assess compliance. If the activity remains noncompliant, it will again cease, and another round of mitigation and follow-up monitoring will be conducted. Duration of Measurements Each of the first three noise monitoring events will occur between 8 AM and 4 PM to capture fluctuations in activities that would typically occur at an active quarry operation. Interim spot tests, if needed, may vary in length but are expected to last two hours or less. The final (fourth) monitoring event will be conducted over three days of operation. Measurement Procedures Sound levels will be measured in 1-second intervals, recording both the 1-second Leq and Lmax. If sound level contributions from discrete, transitory noise sources not associated with the quarry (such as aircraft, birds, loud traffic, etc.) are identified after review of recorded audio taken during the measurement, these extraneous noises will be removed from the measurement data prior to calculating the final interval Leq and Lmax levels attributable to the quarry. Reporting The first three measurement events shall be documented in a brief report summarizing the overall results and describing: instrumentation used in the measurements measurement locations measurement times and durations the calculated Leq and the Lmax levels during each hourly interval representing both the overall sound levels and the levels with extraneous sources removed a description of the noise sources contributing to the measurements a description of the meteorology during the measurement period, including estimated temperature and wind conditions a description of equipment operating during the time of measurement a description of any mitigation measures implemented since the previous monitoring event. The report shall compare the measurements with the environmental noise limits established by the County. The report shall be submitted to King County within three calendar days of each measurement event. After the fourth measurement event of the month-long period has been completed, a final report shall be provided to King County that includes a brief summary of the first three measurement events, the same details for the fourth event as listed above, and the measurement data captured during the fourth monitoring event.

Raging River Quarry November 30, 2016 Noise Monitoring Protocol Page 4 Response to Non-compliant Conditions If violations of the County noise limits are measured, the quarry shall cease the activity causing the issue and identify and implement noise mitigation measures to reduce the levels. A follow-up spot test will be conducted. This process may need to be repeated more than once during the month-long period in order to demonstrate compliance with the County limits. The intent of this monitoring period is to allow for this iterative process during full operation of the facility in order to be able to identify the noise sources of concern, identify and install noise mitigation, and reassess compliance with the noise limits. Noise Consultant Ramboll Environ (RE) shall be employed to measure sound levels in the site vicinity as described above and to prepare reports required by this program. Kristen Wallace, who will be directing the monitoring efforts, has more than 20 years of experience conducting similar monitoring events in King County and the surrounding region. She has also worked with and for King County numerous times in preparing environmental noise impact assessments or noise monitoring plans for similar facilities.

Attachment A: RRQ Quarry Operations Included in Testing Protocol Individual Operations (to be tested independently and simultaneously) I. Crushing Plant Operations a. Primary Crushing Plant Equipment (stationary) i. Jaw Crusher ii. Screening Plant iii. Cone Crusher (is not required except when making certain products) b. Accessory Equipment for Crushing Operations (moving throughout the quarry floor) i. Loader I (moving rock to feed the crushing plant throughout the quarry floor) ii. Loader II (moving freshly made product piles into inventory piles on the quarry floor) iii. Excavator (moving rock into piles for the loader on the quarry floor and sorting large boulders) c. Feed Material i. Mixed material sized from sand up to 3 man boulders i. Currently compliant on a standalone basis and in concert with Truck Loading ii. Additional sound barriers iii. Additional noise insulation in Cone Crusher enclosure iv. Enclosure for Jaw Crusher II. III. Truck Loading Operations a. Products to be loaded i. 5/8 minus, 1 ¼ minus, 2 minus, 5/8 clean, 1 ¼ clean, 2 clean, 2 x4 spalls, 4 x8 spalls, rockery rock b. Location to be loaded i. Coarse products only loaded behind stacked loading containers ii. Fine products can be loaded throughout the quarry floor c. Loading Equipment i. Loader for loading all products except rockery rock (moving throughout the quarry floor) ii. Excavator for loading rockery rock (moving throughout the quarry floor) i. Currently compliant on a standalone basis and in concert with Truck Loading ii. Additional sound barriers Rock Breaking Operations a. Rocks to be Broken

i. Boulders larger than 3 man rockery rock b. Location i. Primarily on quarry floor ii. Occasionally on upper benches from 50 to 200 feet above the quarry floor c. Rock Breaking Equipment i. Excavator affixed with Rock Breaking Attachment i. Currently compliant on a standalone basis ii. Use of portable sound wall iii. Additional sound barriers IV. Excavating Operations a. Equipment i. Excavator affixed with bucket for digging b. Location i. Quarry floor to 200 feet above the quarry floor on upper benches c. Activities i. Sorting and separating large boulders ii. Stripping overburden and placing in piles iii. Casting material over the benches to quarry floor or lower benches i. Currently compliant on a standalone basis ii. Reducing bench height to minimize the distance rock is falling iii. Changing bucket configuration to reduce bucket noise\ iv. Drilling tighter patterns to reduce rock size V. Drilling a. Equipment i. Track mounted rock drill ii. Excavator carrying fabricated drilling sheathe b. Location i. Quarry floor to 200 feet above the quarry floor on upper benches c. Potential Noise Mitigation Strategies i. Modifying drilling sheathe ii. Changing Drills