Airbus MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions. The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

Similar documents
Boeing MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions. The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

AFI Flight Operations Safety Awareness Seminar (FOSAS)

COMMERCIAL LEVEL SIMULATIONS

Cockpit Visualization of Curved Approaches based on GBAS

DLR Project ADVISE-PRO Advanced Visual System for Situation Awareness Enhancement Prototype Introduction The Project ADVISE-PRO

SUPPLEMENT REVISION CESSNA MODEL 182T

Cockpit Voice Recorder Intelligibility Analysis Flight Test Procedures

ASM(AR) Demonstration Engagements Anti-Ship Missile Active Radar Homing

Helicopter Aerial Laser Ranging

VOR/DME APPROACH WITH A320

EE Chapter 14 Communication and Navigation Systems

Introduction. Traffic Symbology. System Description SECTION 12 ADDITIONAL FEATURES

AIRCRAFT AVIONIC SYSTEMS

KMD 550/850. Traffic Avoidance Function (TCAS/TAS/TIS) Pilot s Guide Addendum. Multi-Function Display. For Software Version 01/13 or later

AN/APN-242 Color Weather & Navigation Radar

Level I Operator & Flightline Maintenance

11 Traffic-alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)

HUMAN PERFORMANCE DEFINITION

Presentation plan. An Alert to see and avoid potential collisions. Why do we need it? Understand how it works. Concentrate on lookout

BEECHCRAFT SUPER KING AIR B200 Model: 1998 Crew: 2 pilots Passengers: 7

Remote Sensing. Ch. 3 Microwaves (Part 1 of 2)

Our Vision: Customer Focus. AS350 B2 and B3 Level B Flight Simulator Technical Overview

Microwave Remote Sensing (1)

Microwave Remote Sensing

Human Factors in Glass Cockpit Aircraft

ETSO.DevP.05 1/5. 1 Cf. EASA Web:

Propagation of airborne spacing errors in merging traffic streams

NAVIGATION INSTRUMENTS - BASICS

ARGUS RADAR SYSTEM Oil Spill Detection Addendum. English

Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS

MARITIME, AIRBORNE AND LAND RADAR

II.C. Visual Scanning and Collision Avoidance

Configuration, Capabilities, Limitations, and Examples

Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC

Pilot s Guide KI 825. Bendix/King Safety Display System Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator For Units Having -2, -3 and -4 Softwa re

ICAO AFI/MID ASBU IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP. Cairo, November 2015

Exhibit 1 WRT-2100 Product Description

EMMA2 Operational Concept

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT NYANG TSGT. CHARLES RAMERIEZ JANUARY 15, 1997 (14 pages)

USER MANUAL VOLANS PUBLIC DISPLAY FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT

2. Radar receives and processes this request, and forwards it to Ground Datalink Processor (in our case named GRATIS)

Rockwell Collins ADS-B Perspective Bangkok March 2005

USER MANUAL VOLANS PUBLIC DISPLAY FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT

ACAS Xu UAS Detect and Avoid Solution

Flight Demonstration of the Separation Analysis Methodology for Continuous Descent Arrival

This page is intentionally blank. GARMIN G1000 SYNTHETIC VISION AND PATHWAYS OPTION Rev 1 Page 2 of 27

FlyRealHUDs Very Brief Helo User s Manual

TCAS Functioning and Enhancements

Japan-US Aviation Environmental Workshop Fukutake Hall University of Tokyo 29 November 2017

10 Secondary Surveillance Radar

ATM-ASDE System Cassiopeia-5

Geo/SAT 2 INTRODUCTION TO REMOTE SENSING

Publications and Training Solutions Course Syllabus:

Copyrighted Material - Taylor & Francis

Noise monitoring report

Aerial photography and Remote Sensing. Bikini Atoll, 2013 (60 years after nuclear bomb testing)

Flarm Guidance RunwayHD 3.3, Flarm v6.0

NAVIGATION (2) RADIO NAVIGATION

United States Air Force Europe Bird Strike Hazard Reduction

Target intensity is shown in colour shades to assist the operator in differentiating between large and small vessels and weather severity.

Guidance Material for ILS requirements in RSA

Potential co-operations between the TCAS and the ASAS

Digiflight II SERIES AUTOPILOTS

An operational radar monitoring tool

A map says to you, 'Read me carefully, follow me closely, doubt me not.' It says, 'I am the Earth in the palm of your hand. Without me, you are alone

Theoretical Aircraft Overflight Sound Peak Shape

High Frequency Propagation (and a little about NVIS)

AREA NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

DESIGN ENGINEERING CAPABILITY

Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing

HALS-H1 Ground Surveillance & Targeting Helicopter

SPATIAL AWARENESS BIASES IN SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS DISPLAYS. Matthew L. Bolton, Ellen J. Bass University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA

Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC. Matt Cooper Norrköping Visualization and Interaction Studio University of Linköping, Sweden

An Introduction to Remote Sensing & GIS. Introduction

Chapter 10 Navigation

Evaluation of Algorithms for Fusing Infrared and Synthetic Imagery

Radar. Seminar report. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree Of Mechanical

Controls/Displays Relationship

THREE DIMENSIONAL FLASH LADAR FOCAL PLANES AND TIME DEPENDENT IMAGING

REPORT INCIDENT. Vertical flight path excursion during ILS approach with autopilot engaged

The Black Hole Approach: Don't Get Sucked In!

FAA APPROVED AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FOR. Trio Pro Pilot Autopilot

The Detect & Avoid Requirements and Technologies for small RPAS

Psychofizjologiczne aspekty bezpieczenstwa lotów w załogowych misjach lotniczych i kosmicznych

If yes, details, including whether internal or external, the size & if tethered. Internal, tehered

The Wide Area Augmentation System

Airbus Autonomy Roadmap

EARTH SCIENCE PROJECT CLOUD PHOTOGRAPHY

Human Factors Implications of Continuous Descent Approach Procedures for Noise Abatement in Air Traffic Control

ACTIVE SENSORS RADAR

Collision Avoidance System Optimization for Closely Spaced Parallel Operations through Surrogate Modeling. Kyle A. Smith

Digiflight II SERIES AUTOPILOTS

KMA 24 and KMA 24H Bendix/King Audio Control Systems

Evolution from 3D to 4D radar

Test of GF MCP-PRO. Developed by GoFlight

FLARM and PowerFLARM: Past, Present and Future. FLARM Technology GmbH, Baar

3D Animation of Recorded Flight Data

Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing

2016 Bombardier Global 6000

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Transcription:

Airbus MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

Airbus MultiScan WXR ThreatTrack Frequently Asked Questions Answered in This Article: 1. In AUTO Mode the radar appears to be over sensitive. Why? 2. Sometimes during cruise I see weather out the window that does not show on the display in AUTO Mode. However, I can often see it when I switch to MAN Mode. Is the radar performing properly in AUTO? 3. The radar only appears to be accurate to 40 NM. Sometimes I make deviation decisions at 80 NM, but weather will suddenly appear between two cells at around 40 NM. Can you explain? 4. When switching between AUTO and MAN Modes I get very different pictures. Why? 5. During oceanic flight cells that are below the aircraft tend to stay on the display until about 35 NM. I thought the radar was eliminating cells beneath the aircraft altitude. Why is this not happening over the ocean? 6. Sometimes at mid altitudes (10,000-20,000 ft.) the radar does not show convective cells that I can see out the window. Why?

1. In AUTO Mode the radar appears to be over sensitive. Why? a. In AUTO Mode the radar uses an Automatic Temperature Based Gain that increases gain as the outside air temperature decreases. This puts more energy on the non-reflective cell tops and helps prevent inadvertent cell top penetration. By the time the aircraft is at cruise altitude, AUTO CAL Gain and MAN MAX Gain are essentially the same. Automatic Temperature Based Gain provides a great deal more information to the pilots (more sensitive) than manual radar operation, but it does require that the crew learn to reinterpret the display so that they do not deviate unnecessarily. b. For details, refer the MulitScan ThreatTrack Airbus Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823866 Page 20-23) describes how gain works in both MAN and AUTO modes. Also refer to (Chapter 4, Radar Interpretation beginning on page 38) to better understand how to navigate the weather that is shown. 2. Sometimes during cruise I see weather out the window that does not show on the display in AUTO Mode. However, I can often see it when I switch to MAN Mode. Is the radar performing properly in AUTO? a. In AUTO Mode MultiScan uses a Quiet, Dark Cockpit philosophy. The radar draws a line approximately 6,000 ft. beneath the aircraft. If a storm top protrudes above this line, then the cell is displayed on the ND. If the cell top is below the 6,000 ft. line and, thus, not a threat to the aircraft, it is not displayed. During IMC or night operations the Quiet, Dark Cockpit HMI (human machine interface) helps prevent unnecessary deviations for weather that is well below the aircraft altitude. Note, it is possible to go to MAN Mode, tilt the radar down and see this weather that is beneath the aircraft altitude. Page 1

b. For details on the Quiet, Dark Cockpit Philosophy refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Airbus Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823866 pages 24-25). An explanation of how the radar determines cell tops can also be found on (pages 52-57). 3. The radar only appears to be accurate to 40 NM. Sometimes I make deviation decisions at 80 NM, but weather will suddenly appear between two cells at around 40 NM. Can you explain? a. The radar employs a feature called Sensitivity Time Control (STC) to keep cells looking the same from 80 NM until they pass behind the aircraft. However, at about 40 NM a physical limitation is reached where the STC can no longer turn down the radar sensitivity. Thus, it is not uncommon to see green begin to grow between two cells as the aircraft gets closer to them. Essentially, at 40 NM the radar is now seeing the haze layer that is between the two cells. If a transit corridor fills with green at 40 NM this does not mean that weather has suddenly appeared in the aircraft flight path. Rather, the existing haze between the cells is now visible and may be transited. Light to moderate chop would be expected. b. Please refer to the the MulitScan ThreatTrack Airbus Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823866 page 32) for details. 4. When switching between AUTO and MAN Modes I get very different pictures. Why? a. In MAN Mode the radar operates like a traditional radar. Tilt and gain must be controlled by the flight crew. The only automatic function is windshear alerts. IN AUTO Mode the radar incorporates many automatic functions including The Quiet, Dark Cockpit, Variable Temperature Based Gain, OverFlight Protection, Geographic Weather Correlation and Ground Clutter Elimination. So the picture in AUTO will always be very different than MAN Mode. Because of the safety features associated with AUTO operation, AUTO, CAL Gain are recommended in all phases of flight. Page 2

Note, the Airbus FCOM requires +4 Gain below 20,000 ft. if SB 503 has not been installed. b. Refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Airbus Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823866 pages Chapter 5, How the MultiScan ThreatTrack Radar Works, pages 49 and following), for details. 5. During oceanic flight cells that are below the aircraft tend to stay on the display until about 35 NM. I thought the radar was eliminating cells beneath the aircraft altitude. Why is this not happening over the ocean? a. Oceanic cells are notoriously difficult to display properly. They are about 200 times less reflective than land based cells and tend to rain out at low altitudes, even though the cell top still reaches to the aircraft altitude. Over the ocean the radar looks low in the cell and measures the height of the reflective portion of the cell. It then uses storm models to predict if the cell top reaches the aircraft altitude or not. In general, if the cell is at the aircraft altitude it will be detectable at 120 NM and remain pretty much unchanged in appearance as it approaches the aircraft. If it is beneath the aircraft the red core will change to yellow and then to green as the aircraft gets closer and eventually fall of the display. Best practices dictate that if the cell remains unchanged from 120 to 60 NM it should be considered at the aircraft altitude and a deviation should be requested. b. Refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Airbus Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823866 pages 47-48 and 53-57) for details. Page 3

6. Sometimes at mid altitudes (10,000-20,000 ft.) the radar does not show convective cells that I can see out the window. Why? a. During the early stages of development, cells do not have enough water in them to display. This is especially true in areas with high particulate matter (i.e. pollution). The particulate matter enables the formation of clouds without significant moisture content. This is disconcerting, because these mid altitude cells do have significant bumps associated with them. When the radar shows some weather and does not show other weather, the most logical conclusion is that the cells that are not being displayed have not yet reached the water content threshold for green to be displayed. Note, SB503 will improve detection of mid altitude weather, but it won't solve all of these problems. Sometimes these mid altitude cells, even when they look convective, are not detectable by radar. b. Refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Airbus Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823866 page 46) of the Pilot s Guide for an example. Page 4