Boeing MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions. The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

Similar documents
Airbus MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions. The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

AFI Flight Operations Safety Awareness Seminar (FOSAS)

DLR Project ADVISE-PRO Advanced Visual System for Situation Awareness Enhancement Prototype Introduction The Project ADVISE-PRO

Helicopter Aerial Laser Ranging

Microwave Remote Sensing

AN/APN-242 Color Weather & Navigation Radar

KMD 550/850. Traffic Avoidance Function (TCAS/TAS/TIS) Pilot s Guide Addendum. Multi-Function Display. For Software Version 01/13 or later

EE Chapter 14 Communication and Navigation Systems

This page is intentionally blank. GARMIN G1000 SYNTHETIC VISION AND PATHWAYS OPTION Rev 1 Page 2 of 27

Cockpit Voice Recorder Intelligibility Analysis Flight Test Procedures

Cockpit Visualization of Curved Approaches based on GBAS

AIRCRAFT AVIONIC SYSTEMS

SUPPLEMENT REVISION CESSNA MODEL 182T

10 Secondary Surveillance Radar

AIR ROUTE SURVEILLANCE 3D RADAR

Introduction. Traffic Symbology. System Description SECTION 12 ADDITIONAL FEATURES

ASM(AR) Demonstration Engagements Anti-Ship Missile Active Radar Homing

Microwave Remote Sensing (1)

Presentation plan. An Alert to see and avoid potential collisions. Why do we need it? Understand how it works. Concentrate on lookout

COMMERCIAL LEVEL SIMULATIONS

Remote Sensing. Ch. 3 Microwaves (Part 1 of 2)

Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC. Matt Cooper Norrköping Visualization and Interaction Studio University of Linköping, Sweden

Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC

DESIGN ENGINEERING CAPABILITY

10 TERRAIN Terrain Configurations

11 Traffic-alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)

HUMAN PERFORMANCE DEFINITION

Exhibit 1 WRT-2100 Product Description

An operational radar monitoring tool

VOR/DME APPROACH WITH A320

NAVIGATION (2) RADIO NAVIGATION

ATM-ASDE System Cassiopeia-5

Radar. Seminar report. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree Of Mechanical

There s a Lynx NGT-series solution to fit any need. MODEL COMPARISON. ADS B Out MHz Mode S ES. p p p p. ADS B In. 978 MHz UAT p p p p

DETECTION OF SMALL AIRCRAFT WITH DOPPLER WEATHER RADAR

Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing

39N6E KASTA-2E2 Low-Altitude 3D All-Round Surveillance Radar

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

FLIGHT DECK SUPERIORITY

Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing

SPATIAL AWARENESS BIASES IN SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS DISPLAYS. Matthew L. Bolton, Ellen J. Bass University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA

2. Radar receives and processes this request, and forwards it to Ground Datalink Processor (in our case named GRATIS)

USER MANUAL VOLANS PUBLIC DISPLAY FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT

USER MANUAL VOLANS PUBLIC DISPLAY FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT

High Frequency Propagation (and a little about NVIS)

Automatic Dependent Surveillance -ADS-B

SD3-60 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL SYSTEM (BENDIX RDR 1150 COLOUR) - DESCRIPTION & OPERATION

NAVIGATION INSTRUMENTS - BASICS

Evaluation of Algorithms for Fusing Infrared and Synthetic Imagery

Guidance Material for ILS requirements in RSA

Configuration, Capabilities, Limitations, and Examples

Wireless Signal Propagation Concepts

TCAS Functioning and Enhancements

AIRBORNE RADAR 1944 / 1945 HEAVY CONVERSION UNITS 1661 & 1668 RAF WINTHORPE RAF BOTTESFORD 5 GROUP BOMBER COMMAND

Level I Operator & Flightline Maintenance

LOG OF REVISIONS Rev 1 RFMS, Eurocopter EC130 B4 G500H System. Page Date Number Description FAA Approved.

Mode 4A Unsafe terrain clearance with landing gear not down and flaps not in landing position

Wireless Copilot. Safe2Fly - Height Only Version. Page NanoQuip Ltd

Acknowledgment. Process of Atmospheric Radiation. Atmospheric Transmittance. Microwaves used by Radar GMAT Principles of Remote Sensing

2016 Bombardier Global 6000

THE FUTURE OF ALERTS. ADS-B Semin Mark Palm Thales Melbourn. Air Systems Division

II.C. Visual Scanning and Collision Avoidance

KTA970/ KMH980. Pilot s Guide. B Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System/ Multi-Hazard Awareness System. Rev.

BEECHCRAFT SUPER KING AIR B200 Model: 1998 Crew: 2 pilots Passengers: 7

A map says to you, 'Read me carefully, follow me closely, doubt me not.' It says, 'I am the Earth in the palm of your hand. Without me, you are alone

Experiences in. Flight Inspecting GBAS

REPORT INCIDENT. Vertical flight path excursion during ILS approach with autopilot engaged

ACTIVE SENSORS RADAR

WILLIAM P WITZIG Date: :55:37-04'00'

Advisory Circular AC91-5. Operation of Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs) During Flight Under IFR. Date: 1 April Subject: Author: Chris Lamain

Our Vision: Customer Focus. AS350 B2 and B3 Level B Flight Simulator Technical Overview

Airborne Satellite Communications on the Move Solutions Overview

2000 by UPS Aviation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.

Operational Radar Refractivity Retrieval for Numerical Weather Prediction

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1340 *,**

Rockwell Collins ADS-B Perspective Bangkok March 2005

ENSTROM 480B OPERATOR S MANUAL AND FAA APPROVED ROTORCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT GARMIN GTN 650 NAVIGATION SYSTEM

EMBRAER LEGACY 500 PRE-OWNED. Year Belted toilet. Atlas Air Service AG Hanna-Kunath-Str Bremen / Germany

ETSO.DevP.05 1/5. 1 Cf. EASA Web:

Flight Detector Indicator

ARGUS RADAR SYSTEM Oil Spill Detection Addendum. English

Understanding ADS-B traffic

Radar Reprinted from "Waves in Motion", McGourty and Rideout, RET 2005

An Introduction to Remote Sensing & GIS. Introduction

Rotary Wing DVE Solution Proof Of Concept Live Demonstration

ACAS Xu UAS Detect and Avoid Solution

CHAPTER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

Exam questions: AE3-295-II

RADAR CHAPTER 3 RADAR

ERAD The weather radar system of north-western Italy: an advanced tool for meteorological surveillance

H-TAWS RAeS Conference July 2016

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #13 Page 1 of 11

2010 EMBRAER LINEAGE 1000

The Detect & Avoid Requirements and Technologies for small RPAS

RADIO SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The radio system consists of the following equipment:

Publications and Training Solutions Course Syllabus:

16.400/453J Human Factors Engineering /453. Displays. Prof. D. C. Chandra Lecture 7

GEO 428: DEMs from GPS, Imagery, & Lidar Tuesday, September 11

Offshore Helicopter Terrain Awareness Warning System Alert Envelopes

ICAO AFI/MID ASBU IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP. Cairo, November 2015

Transcription:

Boeing MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

Boeing MultiScan WXR ThreatTrack Frequently Asked Questions Answered in This Article: 1. In AUTO Mode the radar appears to be over sensitive. Why? 2. Sometimes during cruise I see weather out the window that does not show on the display in AUTO Mode. However, I can often see it when I switch to MAN Mode. Is the radar performing properly in AUTO? 3. The radar only appears to be accurate to 40 NM. Sometimes I make deviation decisions at 80 NM, but weather will suddenly appear between two cells at around 40 NM. Can you explain? 4. When switching between AUTO and MAN Modes I get very different pictures. Why? 5. During oceanic flight cells that are below the aircraft tend to stay on the display until about 35 NM. I thought the radar was eliminating cells beneath the aircraft altitude. Why is this not happening over the ocean? 6. Sometimes at mid altitudes (10,000-20,000 ft.) the radar does not show convective cells that I can see out the window. Why? 7. Is the upgrade from Version 1 (non ThreatTrack) to Version 2 (ThreatTrack features) a software update or does it require new hardware? 8. Does the "terrain table" take into consideration any man made obstacles? 9. What is the range of the Predictive Overflight scan?

1. In AUTO Mode the radar appears to be over sensitive. Why? a. In AUTO Mode the radar uses an Automatic Temperature Based Gain that increases gain as the outside air temperature decreases. This puts more energy on the non-reflective cell tops and helps prevent inadvertent cell top penetration. By the time the aircraft is at cruise altitude, AUTO CAL Gain and MAN MAX Gain are essentially the same. Automatic Temperature Based Gain provides a great deal more information to the pilots (more sensitive) than manual radar operation, but it does require that the crew learn to reinterpret the display so that they do not deviate unnecessarily. b. For details, refer the MulitScan ThreatTrack Boeing Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823636 Page 24-27) describes how gain works in both MAN and AUTO modes. Also refer to (Chapter 4, Radar Interpretation beginning on page 42) to better understand how to navigate the weather that is shown. 2. Sometimes during cruise I see weather out the window that does not show on the display in AUTO Mode. However, I can often see it when I switch to MAN Mode. Is the radar performing properly in AUTO? a. In AUTO Mode MultiScan uses a Quiet, Dark Cockpit philosophy. The radar draws a line approximately 6,000 ft. beneath the aircraft. If a storm top protrudes above this line, then the cell is displayed on the ND. If the cell top is below the 6,000 ft. line and, thus, not a threat to the aircraft, it is not displayed. During IMC or night operations the Quiet, Dark Cockpit HMI (human machine interface) helps prevent unnecessary deviations for weather that is well below the aircraft altitude. Note, it is possible to go to MAN Mode, tilt the radar down and see this weather that is beneath the aircraft altitude. Page 1

b. For details on the Quiet, Dark Cockpit Philosophy refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Boeing Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823636 pages 28-29). An explanation of how the radar determines cell tops can also be found on (pages 56-61). 3. The radar only appears to be accurate to 40 NM. Sometimes I make deviation decisions at 80 NM, but weather will suddenly appear between two cells at around 40 NM. Can you explain? a. The radar employs a feature called Sensitivity Time Control (STC) to keep cells looking the same from 80 NM until they pass behind the aircraft. However, at about 40 NM a physical limitation is reached where the STC can no longer turn down the radar sensitivity. Thus, it is not uncommon to see green begin to grow between two cells as the aircraft gets closer to them. Essentially, at 40 NM the radar is now seeing the haze layer that is between the two cells. If a transit corridor fills with green at 40 NM this does not mean that weather has suddenly appeared in the aircraft flight path. Rather, the existing haze between the cells is now visible and may be transited. Light to moderate chop would be expected. b. Please refer to the the MulitScan ThreatTrack Boeing Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823636 page 36) for details. 4. When switching between AUTO and MAN Modes I get very different pictures. Why? a. In MAN Mode the radar operates like a traditional radar. Tilt and gain must be controlled by the flight crew. The only automatic function is windshear alerts. IN AUTO Mode the radar incorporates many automatic functions including The Quiet, Dark Cockpit, Variable Temperature Based Gain, OverFlight Protection, Geographic Weather Correlation and Ground Clutter Elimination. So the picture in AUTO will always be very different than MAN Mode. Because of the safety features associated with AUTO operation, AUTO, CAL Gain are recommended in all phases of flight. Page 2

Note, the Boeing FCOM requires +4 Gain below 20,000 ft. if SB 503 has not been installed. b. Refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Boeing Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823636 Chapter 5, How the MultiScan ThreatTrack Radar Works, pages 53 and following), for details. 5. During oceanic flight cells that are below the aircraft tend to stay on the display until about 35 NM. I thought the radar was eliminating cells beneath the aircraft altitude. Why is this not happening over the ocean? a. Oceanic cells are notoriously difficult to display properly. They are about 200 times less reflective than land based cells and tend to rain out at low altitudes, even though the cell top still reaches to the aircraft altitude. Over the ocean the radar looks low in the cell and measures the height of the reflective portion of the cell. It then uses storm models to predict if the cell top reaches the aircraft altitude or not. In general, if the cell is at the aircraft altitude it will be detectable at 120 NM and remain pretty much unchanged in appearance as it approaches the aircraft. If it is beneath the aircraft the red core will change to yellow and then to green as the aircraft gets closer and eventually fall of the display. Best practices dictate that if the cell remains unchanged from 120 to 60 NM it should be considered at the aircraft altitude and a deviation should be requested. b. Refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Boeing Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823636 pages 51-52 and 57-61) for details. Page 3

6. Sometimes at mid altitudes (10,000-20,000 ft.) the radar does not show convective cells that I can see out the window. Why? a. During the early stages of development, cells do not have enough water in them to display. This is especially true in areas with high particulate matter (i.e. pollution). The particulate matter enables the formation of clouds without significant moisture content. This is disconcerting, because these mid altitude cells do have significant bumps associated with them. When the radar shows some weather and does not show other weather, the most logical conclusion is that the cells that are not being displayed have not yet reached the water content threshold for green to be displayed. Note, SB7 will improve detection of mid altitude weather, but it won't solve all of these problems. Sometimes these mid altitude cells, even when they look convective, are not detectable by radar. b. Refer to the MulitScan ThreatTrack Boeing Pilot s Guide. (CPN: 523-0823636 page 50) of the Pilot s Guide for an example. 7. Is the upgrade from Version 1 (non ThreatTrack) to Version 2 (ThreatTrack features) a software update or does it require new hardware? a. The upgrade is primarily a software update. However, there are minor updates to the receiver transmitters and the pedestal as well. This requires both of these parts to be removed and sent to the service center. Once the updates are complete, those units will be sent back to the owner/operator 8. Does the "terrain table" take into consideration any man made obstacles? a. No. The terrain table simply provides terrain elevation information. Since it is not an obstacle database such as the database used by the TAWS system, it does not require updates. Page 4

9. What is the range of the Predictive Overflight scan? a. 60 to 40nm. The radar attempts to make predictions out to 60nm, however in most cases one would expect to get warnings within 40nm. The issue here is beam width. Beyond 40nm and especially beyond 60nm the beam is too wide to accurately measure cell tops. Page 5