Antennas: Problems and exercises: Answers

Similar documents
Chapter 4 The RF Link

An Introduction to Antennas

Radio Propagation Fundamentals

RVRUSA - DATA DE REFERENCIA PARA INGENIEROS

KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

Antenna fundamentals: With answers to questions and problems (See also Chapter 9 in the textbook.)

EC ANTENNA AND WAVE PROPAGATION

Final Examination. 22 April 2013, 9:30 12:00. Examiner: Prof. Sean V. Hum. All non-programmable electronic calculators are allowed.

Topic 5: Radio wave propagation and safety issues

Propagation mechanisms

SATELLIT COMMUNICATION

1 Propagation in free space and the aperture antenna

The VK3UM Radiation and System Performance Calculator

h max 20 TX Ionosphere d 1649 km Radio and Optical Wave Propagation Prof. L. Luini, July 1 st, 2016 SURNAME AND NAME ID NUMBER SIGNATURE

Chapter 41 Deep Space Station 13: Venus

Study of Factors which affect the Calculation of Co- Channel Interference in a Radio Link

Noise and Propagation mechanisms

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Dundigal, Hyderabad ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNIACTION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

Unit 3 - Wireless Propagation and Cellular Concepts

Aperture Antennas. Reflectors, horns. High Gain Nearly real input impedance. Huygens Principle

REPORT ITU-R SA.2098

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Introduction to Radar Systems. Radar Antennas. MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Radar Antennas - 1 PRH 6/18/02

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Homework 3 Solution Set

ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS

August, Antennas 101: A Course in RF Basics

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

Exercise 1-4. The Radar Equation EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION OF FUNDAMENTALS

ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS

RF-EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT REPORT

Project = An Adventure : Wireless Networks. Lecture 4: More Physical Layer. What is an Antenna? Outline. Page 1

Mesoscale Atmospheric Systems. Radar meteorology (part 1) 04 March 2014 Heini Wernli. with a lot of input from Marc Wüest

TOPIC 2 WAVEGUIDE AND COMPONENTS

Ave output power ANT 1(dBm) Ave output power ANT 2 (dbm)

Mobile and Wireless Networks Course Instructor: Dr. Safdar Ali

Dr. John S. Seybold. November 9, IEEE Melbourne COM/SP AP/MTT Chapters

8GHz RF EMF Strength Meter

Antenna Parameters. Ranga Rodrigo. University of Moratuwa. December 15, 2008

LE/ESSE Payload Design

Notes 21 Introduction to Antennas

The better WLAN Radio Network by an optimal Antenna System

REPORT ITU-R BT TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN BANDS ABOVE 2 GHZ (Questions ITU-R 1/11 and ITU-R 49/11)

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition. Chapter 4 Transmission Media

BHARATHIDASAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE NATTARAMPALLI Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Unit 1

Methodology for Analysis of LMR Antenna Systems

Fourth Year Antenna Lab

Antennas & wave Propagation ASSIGNMENT-I

Chapter 3. Mobile Radio Propagation

Introduction to Radar Systems. The Radar Equation. MIT Lincoln Laboratory _P_1Y.ppt ODonnell

Basic Radio Physics. Developed by Sebastian Buettrich. ItrainOnline MMTK 1

Chapter 3 Solution to Problems

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 4: Antenna Types

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S *

ELEC 425 Interference Control in Electronics Lecture 7(a) Introduction to Antennas: Terminology

Further Refining and Validation of RF Absorber Approximation Equations for Anechoic Chamber Predictions

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Antennas and Propagation

APPENDIX A TEST PLOTS. (Model: 15Z970)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *

CHAPTER 6 THE WIRELESS CHANNEL

Antennas and Propagation

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

Antennas & Propagation. CSG 250 Fall 2007 Rajmohan Rajaraman

ELEC4604. RF Electronics. Experiment 2

Practical Antennas and. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Antenna Engineering Lecture 0: Introduction

NIR MEASUREMENTS. Principles and practices of EMF characterization and measurements

1. Explain the basic geometry and elements of Yagi-Uda antenna.

Amateur Radio License. Propagation and Antennas

TSEK02: Radio Electronics Lecture 6: Propagation and Noise. Ted Johansson, EKS, ISY

Human Exposure Requirements for R&TTE and FCC Approval

Antenna Trainer EAN. Technical Teaching Equipment INTRODUCTION

REPORT ITU-R M Interference and noise problems for maritime mobile-satellite systems using frequencies in the region of 1.5 and 1.

DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE FOR THE BASIC LINE-OF-SIGHT PARAMETERS CALCULATION

RF Design Final Spring 2005

Design of a Novel Compact Cup Feed for Parabolic Reflector Antennas

Power Handling Considerations in a Compact Range

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M Reference radiation pattern for ship earth station antennas

Module contents. Antenna systems. RF propagation. RF prop. 1

TSEK02: Radio Electronics Lecture 6: Propagation and Noise. Ted Johansson, EKS, ISY

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-GEN AND RSS-210 CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR BROADCOM BLUETOOTH MODULE MODEL NUMBER: BCM92046MD

RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION IN THE AMAZON JUNGLE. Mauro S. Assis MAY 2011

UNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?

Evaluation of Suitable Feed Systemes

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

Using pre-approved modules

EEG 816: Radiowave Propagation 2009

ECPS 2005 Conference, March 2005, BREST, FRANCE

Technical Note: Path Align-R Wireless Supporting Information

Übungen zu Drahtlose Kommunikation

Antenna & Propagation. Basic Radio Wave Propagation

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1819

SI TECHNICAL 2018 UNIT IV QUESTION BANK

The VK3UM Radiation and System Performance Calculator

RF EMF Strength Meter

ECE 6390: Satellite Communications and Navigation Systems TEST 1 (Fall 2004)

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-210 ISSUE 7 CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR g WIRELESS LAN + BLUETOOTH PCI-E MINI CARD

Range Considerations for RF Networks

Colubris Networks. Antenna Guide

Transcription:

adio echnology Metropolia/A. Koivumäki Antennas: Problems and exercises: Answers 1. he maximum transmit power of a.4 GHz WLAN base station is 13 dbm and the gain of the transmit antenna is 3.5 dbi. Find out, what is the electric field strength at these distances from the base station: a) 1 meter b) 1 meters c) 1 meters (We assume free space propagation, which of course is often not the case in reality in WLAN's.) P Solution: Power density at distance r from transmit antenna: S = G r lectric field strength from power density: = Z S, where Z = 377 Ω. Now G = 1 3.5/1 ja P = 1 13/1 mw. We get: a) = 1.64 V/m b) =.164 V/m c) = 16.4 mv/m. Compare the results you got in exercise 1 to the "safe field strength value" given by e.g. the UK Health Protection Agency/adiation Protection Division in the document http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/147148435/http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/hpaw ebfile/hpaweb_c/1194947415497. From there you can find the recommendation that the field strength exposure at.4 GHz should not exceed 61 V/m ("exposure guideline for general public"). How many db is the difference between the calculated WLAN field strengths and the given maximum exposure value? Solution: he value 61 V/m given above comes from table A4 on page 34 of the document. In the table, also the value of the corresponding power density is given, it is 1 W/m. From this value we can conclude that 61 V/m in the table is the rms value of the field strength. How can we conclude that? By noticing 61 that 1. his means that power density given in the table is calculated using the equation 377 S = instead of the equation S = which we have used e.g. in the previous exercise. Our Z Z equation S = assumes that the value of is the peak value of the field strength. So, in order Z to compare the safety limit given in the table to the value we calculated in the previous exercise, we have to convert the rms value 61 V/m into peak value, which of course is 61 V/m = 86 V/m. After this we can answer the question: he field strength calculated at a distance of 1 m in the previous exercise is 86 1.64 V/m. his is log db = 34 db below the safety limit given in the document. 1.64 Doesn't sound very dangerous. 3. he maximum transmit power of a GSM phone in a 9 MHz network must be somewhere between 1 W... 4 W. Let's assume that in your phone this maximum power is 1.5 W. he gain of the phone antenna is about dbi. How near the antenna must you be in order that the field strength of the antenna radiation exceeds the maximum 9 MHz exposure limit of 41 V/m?

(he answer is rather surprising, and maybe a bit worrying, but fortunately the reality is quite a bit more complicated, and not so worrying.) Solution: Again, the safety limit 41 V/m is an rms value, so the corresponding power density is W P S = = 4.46. From equation S = G Z we must now solve distance r, and we get m r. G P 1 1.5 W r = = = 1cm. S 4.46 W/m So, if the antenna of the phone is closer than 1 cm, field strength (rms value) will exceed the value 41 V/m. However, this kind of simple calculation does not tell very much about the safety or unsafety of mobile phone use. eality is quite a lot more complicated. 4. A 36 GHz link hop of 4 km hop length uses 5 centimeter reflector antennas. What must be the transmit power in order that the radio link connection functions also during heavy rain (5 mm/h)? Functioning of the connection requires a received signal power of 5 dbm. Solution: Link budget equation: P = P + G L + G. Now transmit power P is unknown, we get it with P = P G + L G. c Values : Wavelength: = f 8 3 1 m/s = = 9 36 1 Hz.833 m π π.5 m Gain of antennas: G = = 1 log η D G db = 1 log.7 db = 43.96 db.833 m (Surface efficiencies of the antennas were not given, here η =.7 is used for both antennas.) Free space loss: 3 r r 4 1 m L f = 1 log db = log db = log db = 135.61dB.8333 m ain causes medium loss. From figure 1.3 of the textbook we see that heavy rain of 5 mm/h causes an attenuation of about 1 db/km at 36 GHz:

So, total medium loss caused by rain in a 4 km link hop is L m = 4 db, which means that the total path loss is now L = L f + L m 176 db. equired transmit power is P = P G + L G = 38.1 dbm = 6.4 W. 5. A radio amateur has a 1 GHz db transmitter with a transmit power of 1 mw and an antenna with 5 db gain. he antenna is directed to the north, the radiation pattern of the antenna is in the figure. a) How much is the power density and field strength at a distance of 5 km in the north? b) How much is the power density and field strength at a distance of 5 km in the east and in the west? c) At a certain distance in the north, it is possible to receive the transmission with a 5 cm reflector antenna. How large an antenna -1-9 -6-3 3 6 9 1 is needed to receive the transmission at Angle (degrees) the same distance in the east and in the west? (Free space propagation is assumed, attenuation of the atmosphere is assumed to be db.).5 G P 1 1 mw Solution: a) S = = = 1.1nW/m r 5 m S = = Z S = 377 Ω 1.1 nw/m =.8 mv/m. Z b) We see from the radiation pattern that in the west power density and field strength are 8 db smaller than in the north. So, in the west they are 16. pw/m and 11 µv/m. In the east they are 31.5 db smaller than in the north, or 7.1 pw/m and 73.3 µv/m. c) he signal power received by an antenna is given by P = Ae S, where A e is the effective area (or capture area) of the receive antenna. So, in order to receive power P from an P electromagnetic field of power density S, an antenna with effective area Ae = is needed. S 1.1 nw/m Because the ratio of power densities in the north and in the west is = 631, the 16. pw/m effective area of the antenna needed in the west is 631 times the effective area of the antenna needed in the north. For a reflector antenna, effective area is given by A e = η A, where η is the aperture efficiency (or surface efficiency) of the antenna and A is the physical area of the reflector. If we assume that the reflector rim is a circle of diameter D, then A = πd. So, in 4 order to have a reflector antenna with an effective area 631 times as large as that of the.5 meter antenna used in the north, a reflector with a physical area 631 times as large as the reflector used in the north is needed. his means that the diameter of the reflector needed in the west must be 631 times as large as the diameter of the reflector used in the north, or 631.5 m = 1.6 m. In a similar way we can calculate that a reflector with a diameter of 18.8 m is needed in the east.

6. You have to build a reflector antenna with a gain of 48 db at 18 GHz. What must be the diameter of the reflector? A couple of points to be taken into account: You use a corrugated horn as the feed antenna of the reflector antenna. With good design, using a corrugated feed horn, you can achieve a surface efficiency of 78 % with an ideal parabolic reflector. However, it is not possible to manufacture an ideal parabolic reflector. If we assume that the average deviation of the reflector surface from an ideal parabolic form is.4 mm, it can be calculated that the gain of the antenna is decreased by.5 db (compared to using an ideal paraboloid). Solution: Gain of reflector antenna: π G = 1 log η D dbi. 1 G /1 Now G = 48 db, η =.78, = 16.67 mm, so we can solve D = = 1.51 m π η his would be the size of an ideal reflector. However, with a real life reflector the actual gain of the antenna would be 47.5 db. So the actual aperture efficiency (=surface efficiency) of the G /1 1 antenna will be η = =.694. Using this value for η instead of.78, we find the actual πd reflector size required for 48 db gain: D = 1.6 m. 7. Frequency is 1 GHz. A pyramidal horn with aperture dimensions a 1 = cm, b 1 = 15 cm is attached to a rectangular waveguide (size: a= 19 mm, b = 9.5 mm). What is the gain of this horn antenna, if the length of the horn L is a) L = 5 cm b) L = 5 cm he gain is found by using equation (9.51) and figure 9.4 of the textbook. Solution: quation (9.51) gives the directivity of a pyramidal horn antenna: Numerical values are obtained from figure 9.4: πd DH D 3ab

xplanation: f = 1 GHz = 5 mm a 1 / = 8, b 1 / = 6 a) L/ = 1 red horizontal lines give D = 7 and DH a b πd DH π D DH D = = 84.8 = 19.3 db 3ab 3 a b = 3 b) L/ = green horizontal lines give D = 5 and DH a b πd DH π D DH D = = 36.7 = 5.1dB 3ab 3 a b = 64 Directivities were calculated, but because gain = directivity minus losses, gain values are quite accurately the same, because losses in a horn antenna are very small.