A Presentation to the National Academies July 29, Larry W. Sumney President/CEO Semiconductor Research Corporation1

Similar documents
G450C. Global 450mm Consortium at CNSE. Michael Liehr, General Manager G450C, Vice President for Research

The SEMATECH Model: Potential Applications to PV

Timothy S. Cale, Ph.D ,

NextFlex: Enabling a Domestic Manufacturing Ecosystem for Flexible Hybrid Electronics (Extended Abstract)

The Center for Emerging and Innovative Sciences University of Rochester September 5, 2013

IBM Research - Zurich Research Laboratory

Accelerating Growth and Cost Reduction in the PV Industry

CITATION OF PRESIDENT S SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MEDAL 2012 WINNER

Growing the Semiconductor Industry in New York: Challenges and Opportunities

ITRS Update (and the European situation) Mart Graef Delft University of Technology

President Barack Obama The White House Washington, DC June 19, Dear Mr. President,

Economic Impact of the Albany Cluster. Kenneth Adams President & CEO, Commissioner Empire State Development

DuPont Reflections on Photovoltaics

New Approaches to Manufacturing Innovation in DOE

Panel 3: Technology Transfer and Development

The Development of the Semiconductor CVD and ALD Requirement

MEDIA RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 26 JULY 2016

Advanced Materials Research Center and University Research. Alex Oscilowski Vice President-Strategy SEMATECH

POLICY BRIEF. Defense innovation requires strong leadership coupled with a framework of

Research Needs for Device Sciences Modeling and Simulation (May 6, 2005)

For personal use only

MEDIA RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. 8 November 2017

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS)

Canada s National Design Network. Community Research Innovation Opportunity

Embraer: Brazil s pioneering aviation giant

Innovation Progress and Future Outlook

Turning low carbon propulsion technologies into products developed in the UK

ISMI Industry Productivity Driver

NCN vision NCN vision 2002

GTMI Strategic Planning: Additive Manufacturing with Metals

A Perspective on Semiconductor Equipment. R. B. Herring March 4, 2004

Leveraging Opportunities for Capital Investment

SUNY Poly in a New Era

VLSI. at IIT Delhi Placements Placement Brochure. Department of Electrical Engineering. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta

Victor O. Matthews (Ph.D)

Outline of AIST --Integration for innovation--

Arshad Mansoor, Sr. Vice President, Research & Development INNOVATION SCOUTS: EXPANDING EPRI S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NETWORK

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Global Manufacturing and the Future of Technology

Michael P. Ridley, Director. NYSTAR High Performance Computing Program

FP7 ICT Work Programme

Interagency Collaboration: Barriers / Solutions

Technology Transfer: Working with Industry at MIT. 10 February 2009 Kenneth A. Goldman Manager, Corporate Relations MIT Industrial Liaison Program

Venkat Selvamanickam Venkat Selvamanickam Education Professional Experience Research Highlights

_prop_lab_partner.htm

Collaboration is the New Competition

Research Strategy of Tampere University Community

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

Presentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes. Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011

CMP: Where have we been and where are we headed next? Robert L. Rhoades, Ph.D. NCCAVS CMPUG Meeting at Semicon West San Francisco, July 10, 2013

A Theory-Based Logic Model for Innovation Policy and Evaluation

IMI Labs Semiconductor Applications. June 20, 2016

University of Dundee. Design in Action Knowledge Exchange Process Model Woods, Melanie; Marra, M.; Coulson, S. DOI: 10.

NSF Engineering Directorate Overview and Priorities

a) Core federal technology transfer principles and practices that should be protected, and those which should be adapted or changed;

National Centre for Flexible Electronics

PhD Student Mentoring Committee Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

FEMTOPRINT From a Factory-of-the-Future FP7 project to a spin-off Yves Bellouard Project coordinator of FP7 Femtoprint

Innovation Economy. Creating the. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

Nanotechnology, the infrastructure, and IBM s research projects

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

Catapult Network Summary

THE FLC: A HOW-TO GUIDE FOR ACCESSING FEDERAL RESOURCES. John Dement Chairman, Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer

Model of Open Innovation IMEC IIAP: a View from Russia

FIATECH s Capital Projects Technology Roadmap: how we can use it today

Industry Academia Government alliance

ARTEMIS The Embedded Systems European Technology Platform

Opportunities and Challenges for Open Innovation

NASA Office of the Chief Technologist

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE IMEC IP BUSINESS

The ERC: a contribution to society and the knowledge-based economy

Science of Science & Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Julia Lane

Rump Session: Advanced Silicon Technology Foundry Access Options for DoD Research. Prof. Ken Shepard. Columbia University

Rising to the Innovation Challenge

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Earth Cube Technical Solution Paper the Open Science Grid Example Miron Livny 1, Brooklin Gore 1 and Terry Millar 2

450mm silicon wafers specification challenges. Mike Goldstein Intel Corp.

Public. Introduction to ASML. Ron Kool. SVP Corporate Strategy and Marketing. March-2015 Veldhoven

The Defence of Basic

Connecting to Grow the Space Economy

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

Lithography Industry Collaborations

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Technology Transfer. When, Why, Issues and Advantages. David F. Sutter IREAP, U. of Maryland. Bruce P. Strauss U.S. Dept.

A New Era in Nanotechnology Research: The Industry-University-Government Cooperative Model

MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE

6-7 October Marina Bay Sands Expo & Convention Centre Peony Ballroom [Level 4]

Building a Cell Ecosystem. David A. Bader

Plum Goes Orange Elsevier Acquires Plum Analytics - The Scho...

Nanotechnology and its effect on Electronics Manufacturing

SEMI Connects: An Overview of SEMI Worldwide. Theresia Fasinski - Manager Membership Relations, SEMI Europe

National Instruments Accelerating Innovation and Discovery

CONFORMAL OGIVE ALON DOME FABRICATION

Holst Centre Wireless Autonomous Sensor Technologies & Flexible Electronics

Foundations Required for Novel Compute (FRANC) BAA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated: October 24, 2017

Enabling Science, Technology & Innovation For National Security

National Projects on Semiconductor in NEDO

In 1984, a cell phone in the U.S. cost $3,995 and

Transcription:

A Presentation to the National Academies July 29, 2009 Larry W. Sumney President/CEO Semiconductor Research Corporation1

What is SRC? World s leading consortium funding collaborative university research driven by industry needs. Adds to broad Federal investment in universities to fund industry-relevant research. Exists between blue sky basic research and industry product development. Invests in people and research; not bricks and mortar. 2

Why was SRC established? Support U.S. industry competitiveness Jointly invest in basic, precompetitive research relevant to industry needs; explore new technologies Stimulate academic interest in manufacturing & design research Promote collaboration among researchers, departments/disciplines, and universities Generate a pool of experienced faculty and relevantly educated students 3

How does SRC operate? Strategic Planning Project Initiation Progress Monitoring Research Output Member Satisfaction Government Partners Iterative process by advisory boards and SRC staff Solicitation, white papers, advisory board reviews Annual reviews by industry, gov t and academia. Industry mentors throughout project Rapid electronic distribution of results and student information Value metrics maintained for each company member Sought for programs with shared interests This process has been exercised by the SRC community thousands of times over the past 27 years. 4

A Major SRC Accomplishment Built the world s largest and most successful university research force to support the 10,000-fold advances of the semiconductor industry In 1982, fewer than 100 students and faculty conducted silicon research 27 years later, the SRC had built a force of 1,707 faculty and 7,455 students! The SRC community publishes 20% of the world research on silicon. 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 No. of Publications SRC Member Companies SRC Universities 304 180 343 1247 341 1626 320 1981 1991 2001 2008 2226 5

SRC Numbers SRC Research Programs* Over $1.3B invested by SRC participants 2,906 contracts 7,455 students 1,707 faculty members 241 universities Deliverables* 43,419 technical documents 326 patents granted 777 patent applications 579 software tools 2,315 research tasks/themes * Approx. from inception through 2008 6

National Medal of Technology CITATION The National Medal of Technology was awarded to the Semiconductor Research Corporation.. For building the world s largest and most successful university research force to support the rapid growth and 10,000-fold advances of the semiconductor industry; for proving the concept of collaborative research as the first high-tech research consortium; and for creating the concept and methodology that evolved into the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. 7

The Secrets of SRC s Success Competitors agree to collaborate Commitment to Moore s Law The Roadmap Precompetitive shared IP The industry technical experts in the loop World-class researchers (faculty and students) Nimble and adaptable Accountable; value-driven 8

Roadmaps and Moore s Law For other industries, an observation such as Moore s law may not be apparent or possible; but identifying research needs to achieve certain capabilities is possible. Industry commitment is a must. SRC began the ITRS journey for the semiconductor industry this way 9

Semiconductor Research Corporation A Family of Distinct, Related Program Entities TRC(s) Global Research Collaboration Ensuring vitality of current industry Focus Center Research Program Breaking down barriers to extend CMOS to its limits Nanoelectronics Research Initiative Beyond CMOS identifying next information element Attracting and educating the next generation of innovators and technology leaders Topical Research Collaborations Topic(s) chosen by participants TERC NINE AMD Freescale GLOBALFOUNDRIES IBM Intel TI AMAT Axcelis Cadence Mentor Novellus Rohm & Haas TEL The Mitre Corp State of Arizona State of Georgia State of Texas State of NY UK Eng & Phy Sci NIST NSF SEMATECH AMD AMAT Cadence Freescale GLOBALFOUNDRIES IBM Intel MICRON Novellus TI Xilinx DARPA AMD IBM Intel MICRON TI NIST NSF State of CA State of Indiana State of NY State of Texas Oregon NanoScience & Microtech Institute South Bend, Indiana AMAT First Solar Interested: GE IBM BP Solar Suntech Air Products Q-Cells Goodyear Exxon Mobil Intel Interested: IBM Lockheed Martin Corning

Our Four Major Research Programs Global Research Collaboration Focus Center Research Program Nanoelectronics Research Initiative Topical Research Collaboration Time Frame 7-14 yrs 14-20 yrs > 20 yrs Variable Technology Purpose Industry Participation Government Participation Traditional CMOS Narrowing options Limit of Traditional CMOS New options Beyond CMOS Revolutionary discoveries Selected Topics Topic Specific 11

Topical Research Collaborations (TRCs): A New SRC Research Vehicle Apply the collaborative model to new technical areas Leverage the successful SRC roadmapping and industry-engagement model with new companies and additional government agencies Supply opportunities for new product directions for current members 12

Topical Research Collaborations (TRCs) in Development 1. National Institute for Nano-engineering (NINE) Nano-materials and Nano-engineering Joint program with Sandia National Laboratories 2. The Energy Research Corporation (TERC) Designed to help enable the realization of reliable, low cost, energy efficient systems Initially focus on modeling and simulation of PV technologies and leverage NSF Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) capability at Purdue Industry members involved are: AMAT CorningExxon Mobil First Solar GE Goodyear IBM Intel Lockheed Martin 13

Applicability of Collaborative Model to PV Manufacturing Research PV and semiconductor manufacturing share: Common materials silicon ingots/wafers Common equipment etching, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, metrology tools, defect inspection, test and assembly, etc. Common processes wafer handling, deposition of materials and coatings on substrates. Many potential technology overlaps (e.g., thin films, flexible substrates and novel semiconductor materials). PV and semiconductor manufacturing research both focus on increasing efficiencies and reducing costs. 14

Possible Collaborative Model for PV Manufacturing Research Bring together industry, universities and government, e.g. DOE Laboratories, NIST, etc. Develop roadmap and technology assessment to identify gaps and common challenges. Focus on precompetitive research and on developing underlying technology for manufacturing improvement. Make research results broadly available to all participants. Participants receive IP on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis. Results generally would be published. 15

Possible Collaborative Model for PV Manufacturing Research (cont.) Coordinate to minimize overlap, leverage efforts, and promote commercialization of results. Center in a university or a Federal laboratory. Not a demonstration or prototype facility, but could interact with a demonstration facility or other proprietary projects. 16

Summary Collaborative research will spur innovation Need industry to commit/lead by jointly identifying areas of R&D needs where non-exclusivity is acceptable. Government can incentivize by providing significant co-funding for implementation of research plan. Given the diversity of technologies, distributed but coordinated university and/or Federal laboratory centers seems preferable to building a pilot facility. DOE Energy Frontier Research Centers (funded by BES) are a good start, but are not sufficiently connected to industry. DOE could use flexibility offered by ARPA-E to coordinate a portion of its PV manufacturing research with a (SRC like) consortium that is guided and funded by industry. 17

PV Manufacturing Research Ecosystem ARPA-E Energy Frontier Research Centers Industry- Acad.-Govt Consortium Innovation Hubs PV Manufacturing Industry Academia DOE Laboratories 18