Qualification testing of 100 ohm shielded channel, Class EA. Performed for Tyco Electronics Raychem N.V.

Similar documents
DELTA Test Report. Certification testing of generic cabling products: Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model. Performed for Sterling

Special testing of 100 ohm unshielded channel, Class E. Performed for HCS KABLOLAMA SISTEMLERI SAN.VE TIS.A.S.

TEST REPORT. DANAK Reg. no. 19. Electrical performance testing of: Connecting Hardware according to IEC

Independent Testing - For End User Confidence

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

125 Eugene O Neill Drive 6120 Powers Ferry Road New London, CT Suite 150 Ph (860) Atlanta, GA Fax (860)

Superiorr Essex. Suite 150

125 Eugene O Neill Drive 6120 Powers Ferry Road New London, CT Suite 150 Ph (860) Atlanta, GA Fax (860)

Australian/New Zealand Standard

This document is a preview generated by EVS

n Proper pin termination at each end n Continuity to the remote end n Shorts between any two or more conductors n Transposed pairs: n Crossed pairs.

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025: 2005

XX.7 Link segment characteristics

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Independent Testing - For End User Confidence

TSB-67. Transmission Performance Specifications for Field Testing of UTP Cabling Systems

AMP NETCONNECT Category 6 System

Category 7 A /Class F A Products

Samtec MODS-LJ Series (LIFEJACK ) Category 5/5e Qualification

1) The addition of TCL and ELTCTL requirements to Category 6

- Characteristic impedance of cabling links is characterised by Return Loss

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025

EFFECT OF SHIELDING ON CABLE RF INGRESS MEASUREMENTS LARRY COHEN

Automatic measuring system for LAN cables AXT & Cat 8 HF only

PDI TEST REPORT. No.0437

Physical Test Setup for Impulse Noise Testing

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Level III measurement accuracy of field testers for Twisted Pair Copper Cabling Explained in Technical Detail

Cabling Ad Hoc Cat 5e Measurements

Comparison of vario. ous cables & channels

Field Measurements of Return Loss

MDS-21 Absorbing Clamp, EZ-24 Ferrite Clamp

AESA TECHNOLOGY OF LAN CABLE

IEEE Std 802.3ap (Amendment to IEEE Std )

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N 755 Date: Replaces ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N n/a

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Information technology. Generic cabling systems, General requirements

Cable Testing TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING

Data sheet MC GC1000 pro23 Cat.7 S/FTP 4P LSHF-FR 1640 ft

Automatic measuring system for xdsl & LAN cables (100 MHz) Designed to measure all types of telecom and special cables

Helios Automatic measuring system for telephone cables. Designed to measure all types of telecom cables

ENY81 Coupling Network

COPPER + LWL RAW CABLES

Methods for Testing Impulse Noise Tolerance

Field Testing Update

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Some considerations concerning alien crosstalk Dr.-Ing. J.-H. (Jo) Walling Consultant Beaconsfield, P.Q. Canada

Measuring the EMC on RF-connectors and connecting hardware. Tube in tube test procedure

Test report number CRT-001b Project number CRT-001b

Compass safe distance measurements of Trackball

Category 6 A F/FTP Euroclass C ca Cables

Data sheet MC GC1200 pro22 Cat.7A S/FTP 4P LSHF-FR, class Dca s2 d2

Part Number: 7953A Cat 6 600V DataTuff, (4 pr) 23 AW G Solid BC, PP/PVC/PVC, Foil Shld, CMR, CMX-Outdoor

Protocol based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025

Bill Ham Martin Ogbuokiri. This clause specifies the electrical performance requirements for shielded and unshielded cables.

10GBASE-T. Channel Model Proposal

Performed for LEO Pharma A/S, LEO Innovation Lab

NETWORK CONNECTIVITY SYSTEMS

Call For Interest PoE- plus. Chris Di Minico MC Communications

DELTA Test Report. Performed for INWIDO Denmark A/S. DANAK 100/2331 Project no.: Page 1 of October 2017

Influence of Aging Effects on Cables. Influence of Aging Effects on RF behavior Including Mode Conversion of STP and UTP Cables

MEASUREMENTS OF COUPLING THROUGH BRAIDED SHIELD VIA NEW CONDUCTED IMMUNITY TECH- NIQUE

Introduction Identification Implementation identification Protocol summary. Supplier 1

XBee Series 2 OEM RF Module Model No.: XBEE2 FCC ID: OUR-XBEE2. Applicant: MaxStream, Inc. 355 South 520 West Suite 180 Lindon, UT 84042

ACR (Attenuation to Crosstalk Ratio) ACR-F. Alien Crosstalk. Attenuation (signal attenuation, conductor attenuation)

T10/05-428r0. From: Yuriy M. Greshishchev, PMC-Sierra Inc. Date: 06 November 2005

Data sheet MC GC1200 pro22 Cat.7A S/FTP 2x4P LSHF-FR 1640 ft


Date: ESPOO Page: 1 ( 10) Appendices - Transceiver. SATELLINE-EASy Pro 35W SATEL-TA18 SATEL Oy, Finland

bedea bedea EMC of Cables & Connectors & Test methods EMC of Cables & Connectors & Test methods Test set-up CoMeT

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Ship Hybrid Cable DL 58 5 x UC1500 SS22 2x SM BendBright XS G.657.A2 6x MM MaxCap-BB-OM4

Irish Standard I.S. EN :2009

EMC-PERFORMANCE OF BALANCED (SYMMETRICAL) CABLES

Detailed Specifications & Technical Data

ACCREDITED LABORATORY. LIBERTY LABS, INC. Kimballton, IA for technical competence in the field of Calibration

Amateur Radio License. Propagation and Antennas

Chapter 12: Transmission Lines. EET-223: RF Communication Circuits Walter Lara

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 ANSI/NCSL Z & ANSI/NCSL Z540.3

CAT. 5e U/UTP 4x2x24AWG/1 CCA DOUBLE SHEATH

Application Note 5044

Install & Go Cat.8 S/FTP Trunk Cable Assembly Description

Client Archive No.: - / - 1 Summary: Table of results: shielding effectiveness measurement: References:...

Ileana-Diana Nicolae ICMET CRAIOVA UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA MAIN BUILDING FACULTY OF ELECTROTECHNICS

Product Bulletin. Belden DataTwist 4800 Cables

FCC PART 15C & RSS 247 TEST REPORT

EMC Bayswater Pty Ltd. EMC COMPLIANCE REPORT In accordance with: AS/NZS CISPR 15: Indice Ecotech Pty Ltd. 14W LED Downlight

RF300 LARGE LOOP ANTENNA

UTP Copper. SFTP Copper. FUTP Copper. Composite. Special Applications Copper. Category 5e. Category 6 Category 5E Category 3. Category 7A Category 7

Keysight MOI for USB Type-C Connectors & Cable Assemblies Compliance Tests (Type-C to Legacy Cable Assemblies)

Length Restrictions in Cable Testing

Nemko-CCL, Inc West Alexander Street Salt Lake City, UT

INSTALLATION AND OPERATING MANUAL

CABLE.

Report Of. Shielding Effectiveness Test For. DefenderShield. Test Date(s): September 1 October 2, 2012

Actual Cable Data update

Install & Go Cat.8 STP Trunk Cable Assembly Description

Report for Excelsys EMC Measurements for 6Xgen Purchase Order: by Project Number EMT08J027

Keysight MOI for USB Type-C Connectors & Cable Assemblies Compliance Tests (Type-C to Legacy Cable Assemblies)

Transcription:

We help ideas meet the real world DELTA Test Report DANAK TEST Reg. no. 19 Qualification testing of 100 ohm shielded channel, Class EA Performed for Tyco Electronics Raychem N.V. DANAK-19J1636 Project no.: N312212 Page 1 of 49 23 October 2006 DELTA Danish Electronics, Light & Acoustics Venlighedsvej 4 2970 Hørsholm Denmark Tel. (+45) 72 19 40 00 Fax (+45) 72 19 40 01 www.delta.dk This report is issued under the rules of DANAK (Danish Accreditation). Further information about DANAK can be found at www.danak.dk. The report must not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of DELTA.

Page 2 of 49 Title Product description Product identification Qualification testing of 100 ohm shielded channel, Class E A Shielded Channel, Class E A, Category 6 A Horizontal cables: 1711163 / 57893 / 1499102 Cords: 1711360, 959385 Wall Outlet: 1711160 with dust cover / 1711342 without dust cover Patch Panel: 1711278 Compliance statement 2006-178 2006-179 2006-180 Report no. Project no. DANAK-19J1636 N312212 Test object received 2 October 2006 Test period October 2006 Client Contact Tyco Electronics Raychem N.V. BP 37 3010 Kessel-Lo Belgium Allan Nielsen Specification draft ISO/IEC 11801 amd 1.1 Results Prepared by Reviewed by Compliance with specifications is verified Erik Bech Claude Videt Date 23 October 2006 Responsible Erik Bech, Test Manager DELTA LAN Components and Systems Testing

Page 3 of 49 Table of content Page 1. Summary 4 2. Channel components 5 3. Conclusion 6 4. Test results 7 4.1 High frequency transmission test results 8 4.2 Resistance properties 33 5. Reference to applicable standards and documents 33 5.1 Generic cabling standards 33 5.2 Special requirements for EC VERIFIED 33 6. Test procedures 33 6.1 Electrical test 33 6.1.1 Attenuation 33 6.1.2 Return loss 33 6.1.3 Near end crosstalk 33 6.1.4 Powersum near end crosstalk (PSNEXT) 33 6.1.5 Attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (ACR) 33 6.1.6 Power sum ACR (PSACR) 33 6.1.7 Attenuation to crosstalk ratio-far end 33 6.1.8 Coupling attenuation 33 6.1.9 DC loop resistance 33 6.1.10 Propagation delay 33 6.1.11 Delay skew 33 6.1.12 Alien crosstalk tests 33 6.2 Test software 33

Page 4 of 49 1. Summary Three communication channels have been subjected to an electrical qualification test programme to verify that they comply with generic cabling standards. The three channels are all four connector model channels. Channel no. 1 uses a double foil shielded horizontal cable for 600 MHz, F/FTP 600, 1711163. Channel no. 2 uses a braid and foil shielded horizontal cable for 600 MHz, S/FTP 600, 57893. Channel no. 3 uses a braid and foil shielded horizontal cable for 1200 MHz, S/FTP 1200, 1499102. Cords, Wall Outlets and Patch Panels are the same for the three types of channels. Transmission measurements are performed on all three types of channels and on one short channel. External crosstalk parameters are measured for channel no. 1. Coupling attenuation is measured for the three types of horizontal cables. Coupling attenuation for the two braided cables is equal to or better than coupling attenuation of the foil shielded cable. It is therefore concluded that the external crosstalk performance of the channels with the braided horizontal cable is equal to or better than that of channel no. 1. The channels for this electrical performance test were assembled and delivered to DELTA by the client. The channel testing has been performed under laboratory conditions at the European Cabling group of DELTA. This report firstly gives a detailed description of the channels under test. Then the conclusion is given followed by the test results. At last an overview of the test procedures and applied standard are given.

Page 5 of 49 2. Channel components Equipment cord Patch cord Terminal Terminal cord Horizontal cable Connection TO/TP Equipment Figure 1 The channel is defined as shown in figure (4 connector model). The disturbed channel consists of the following components (4 connector model): Channel part Cable type Length Connecting hardware Terminal cord Flexible cable 3 m 1 plug Connection TO/TP Flexible cable 15 m 1 plug 1 socket Floor cable Horizontal cable 65 m 2 sockets Patch cord Flexible cable 3 m 2 plugs Equipment cord Flexible cable 3 m 1 socket The disturbers consist of the following components (3 connector model): Channel part Cable type Length Connecting hardware Terminal cord Flexible cable 3 m 1 plug Floor cable Horizontal cable 15 m 2 sockets Patch cord Flexible cable 3 m 2 plugs Equipment cord Flexible cable 3 m 1 socket

Page 6 of 49 3. Conclusion The tested channel sample complies with the applied specifications. The test results are only applicable for the tested sample.

Page 7 of 49 4. Test results See pages 8 41.

Page 8 of 49 4.1 High frequency transmission test results BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION Disturbed Channel (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) RETURN LOSS Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600)

Page 9 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600)

Page 10 of 49 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600)

Page 11 of 49 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) POWER SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600)

Page 12 of 49 PROPAGATION DELAY Disturbed channel (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) DELAY SKEW Disturbed channel (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600)

Page 13 of 49 RETURN LOSS Disturbed channel from terminal end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbed channel from terminal end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600)

Page 14 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbed channel from terminal end (Horizontal cable F/FTP 600) BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION Disturbing channel (short channel)

Page 15 of 49 RETURN LOSS Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end

Page 16 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end

Page 17 of 49 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end

Page 18 of 49 POWER SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F) Disturbing channel (short channel) from equipment end PROPAGATION DELAY Disturbing channel (short channel)

Page 19 of 49 DELAY SKEW Disturbing channel (short channel) RETURN LOSS Disturbing channel (short channel) from terminal end

Page 20 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbing channel (short channel) from terminal end NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbing channel (short channel) from terminal end

Page 21 of 49 BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION Disturbed channel (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) RETURN LOSS Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600)

Page 22 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600)

Page 23 of 49 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600)

Page 24 of 49 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) POWER SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600)

Page 25 of 49 PROPAGATION DELAY Disturbed channel (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) DELAY SKEW Disturbed channel (horizontal cable S/FTP 600)

Page 26 of 49 RETURN LOSS Disturbed channel from terminal end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbed channel from terminal end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600)

Page 27 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbed channel from terminal end (horizontal cable S/FTP 600) BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION Disturbed channel (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 28 of 49 RETURN LOSS Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200) NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 29 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200) ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 30 of 49 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200) ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (ACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 31 of 49 POWER SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F) Disturbed channel from equipment end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200) PROPAGATION DELAY Disturbed channel (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 32 of 49 DELAY SKEW Disturbed channel (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200) RETURN LOSS Disturbed channel from terminal end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 33 of 49 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT) Disturbed channel from terminal end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200) NEAR END CROSSTALK POWERSUM (PSNEXT) Disturbed channel from terminal end (horizontal cable S/FTP 1200)

Page 34 of 49 COUPLING ATTENUATION Cable F/FTP 600, Far end COUPLING ATTENUATION Cable F/FTP 600, Near end

Page 35 of 49 COUPLING ATTENUATION Cable S/FTP 600 Far end COUPLING ATTENUATION Cable S/FTP 600, Near end

Page 36 of 49 COUPLING ATTENUATION Cable S/FTP 1200, Far end COUPLING ATTENUATION Cable S/FTP 1200, Near end

Page 37 of 49 COUPLING ATTENUATION Disturbed channel equipment end, Far end. Limit for environment E3 COUPLING ATTENUATION Disturbed channel equipment end, Near end. Limit for environment E3

Page 38 of 49 POWERSUM ALIEN NEAR END CROSSTALK (PSANEXT) 6 around one configuration POWERSUM ALIEN ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (PSAACR- F) 6 around one configuration

Page 39 of 49 AVERAGE POWERSUM ALIEN NEAR END CROSSTALK (AvPSANEXT) 6 around one configuration AVERAGE POWERSUM ALIEN ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK LOSS RATIO - FAR (AvPSAACR-F) 6 around one configuration

Page 40 of 49 Network Analyser Hewlett Packard, type 8753D Instrument no.: 31094 Switch Agilent, type 87050A Instrument no.: 31173 Network Analyser Hewlett Packard, type 8753E Instrument no.: 31109 Absorbing clamp Rohde & Schwarz, type MDS 21 Instrument no.: 31097 Hybrid MA-COM, type H-1-4 Instrument no.: 31079 Hybrid MA-COM, type H-1-4 Instrument no.: 31080 Hybrid MA-COM, type H-1-4 Instrument no.: 31100 Hybrid MA-COM, type H-1-4 Instrument no.: 31148 4.2 Resistance properties Table 1 DC loop resistance, channel #1 Pair Resistance [Ohm] Requirement Compliance 1 17.3 < 25 YES 2 17.1 YES 3 17.2 YES 4 17.1 YES Table 2 DC resistance unbalance, channel #1 Pair R unbalance [%] Requirement Compliance 1 0.4 < 3% YES 2 0.0 YES 3 0.9 YES 4 0.2 YES Micro Ohm meter Keithley, type 2000 Instrument no.: 31092

Page 41 of 49 5. Reference to applicable standards and documents Test of the cable under test is performed with reference to the following standards: 5.1 Generic cabling standards ISO/IEC 11801, 2. edition Information Technology, Generic cabling for customer premises. (This standard covers all cabling classes up to Category 7). ISO/IEC 11801 draft amendment 1.1 25N1173. Final proposed draft amendment to ISO/IEC 11801:2002 Generic cabling for customer premises. (This draft covers requirements for class E A channels to support 10GBASE-T). ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.2-10 Transmission performance specifications for 4-pair 100 Ohm augmented category 6 cabling, draft 5. IEEE P802.3an amendment of : IEEE Standard for Information Technology Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks Specific requirements. Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications. Amendment: Physical Layer and management Parameters for 10 Gb/s Operation, Type 10GBASE-T. 5.2 Special requirements for EC VERIFIED DQP231006 Terms and conditions for use of the EC VERIFIED marking on generic cabling products dated 2 January 2006.

Page 42 of 49 6. Test procedures The tests carried out on the communication channel under test are performed according to the standard: IEC 61935-1 Testing of balanced communication cabling in accordance with ISO/IEC 11801-Part 1: Installed cabling. The test methods are detailed in test procedures worked out by DELTA and approved by DANAK. In this section the procedures are described briefly. 6.1 Electrical test The electrical tests on the communication channel under test are performed according to the procedures described in this section. The performed tests are shown in the following table. The floor cable is stretched on a non-conductive surface. Measured from Terminal end (wall outlet) Equipment end (patch panel) Attenuation x Near end crosstalk (NEXT) x x Equal level far end crosstalk (ELFEXT) x Return loss x x Propagation delay Delay skew x x Coupling attenuation x Figure 2 Performed tests

Page 43 of 49 6.1.1 Attenuation NETWORK ANALYSER PLOTTER/ PRINTER S-PARAMETER TEST SET/ DIVISER CHANNEL UNDER TEST BALUN BALUN Figure 3 Test set-up for attenuation measurements. Terminal end and equipment end are connected to one balun each. The measurement uncertainty for attenuation is ±0.15 db for attenuation up to 40 db and ±0.5 db for attenuation up to 60 db.

Page 44 of 49 6.1.2 Return loss NETWORK ANALYSER PLOTTER/ PRINTER S-PARAMETER TEST SET/ DIVISER CHANNEL UNDER TEST BALUN LOAD Figure 4 Test set-up for return loss measurements. The return loss of the channel under test is measured with the far end terminated with a resistance of the specified characteristic impedance of the channel under test, Z0. The measurement uncertainty for return loss is dependant of the measured return loss value. The error band is specified in the table below: Measured return loss Error band 5 db 4.8 RL 5. 2 10 db 9.7 RL 10. 3 15 db 14.5 RL 15. 5 20 db 19.2 RL 20. 9 25 db 23.6 RL 26. 7 30 db 31.1 RL 42. 2 40 db 34 RL

Page 45 of 49 6.1.3 Near end crosstalk NETWORK ANALYSER PLOTTER/ PRINTER S PARAMETER TEST SET/ DIVISER LOAD LOAD BALUN BALUN DEVICE UNDER TEST Figure 5 Test set-up for near end cross talk measurements. Near end cross talk, NEXT, is measured as the attenuation from one pair to the others and these measurements are repeated for all pair combinations. In the far end all pairs are terminated with a resistor with a value of the quoted characteristic impedance of the component under test. The measurement uncertainty for NEXT is dependant of the level of measured NEXT. The uncertainty is shown in the table below: Measured NEXT Uncertainty 40 db ± 0.5 db 60 db ± 0.6 db 70 db ± 0.8 db 80 db ± 1.7 db 6.1.4 Powersum near end crosstalk (PSNEXT) PSNEXT is calculated according to the formula: PSNEXT = 10log( 10 + 10 + 10 x1 / 10 x2 / 10 x3 / 10 ) where x1, x2, x3 are the pair-to-pair cross talk measurements in db between the selected pair and the other three pairs. The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements.

Page 46 of 49 6.1.5 Attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (ACR) Attenuation to Crosstalk Ratio, ACR is calculated for each pair considering the minimum near end cross talk, NEXT measured for the six pair combinations. The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements. 6.1.6 Power sum ACR (PSACR) PSACR is calculated according to the formula: PSACR = 10 log(10 + 10 + 10 + 10 x1/10 x2 /10 x3 /10 x4 /10 Where x1, x2, x3, and x4 are the pairs ACR measurements in db. The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements. ) 6.1.7 Attenuation to crosstalk ratio-far end NETWORK ANALYSER PLOTTER/ PRINTER LOAD LOAD S - PARAMETER TEST SET/ DIVISER DEVICE UNDER TEST BALUN BALUN Figure 6 Test set-up for far end crosstalk measurements. ACR-F is calculated from the measured values of far end crosstalk, FEXT, and attenuation, ATT. ACR-F = FEXT - ATT The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements.

Page 47 of 49 6.1.8 Coupling attenuation REFLECTOR PLATE, with balun (if applicable) CLAMP 600 ± 10 cm FERRITE, far-end-position at least 100 m total for balanced cables Figure 7 Test set-up for coupling attenuation measurements The coupling attenuation is measured in the near and far end using an absorbing clamp. The length of the measured part of the component or cabling under test is 6 m. The measurement result of the network analyser is corrected for insertion loss of the balun and absorbing clamp. The result is also corrected for the reflected wave at the input of the clamp. The result is evaluated by a limit curve, which is horizontal up to 100 MHz and has a slope of 20 db/octave up to 1 GHz. The value for which the limit curve intercepts the Y axis is the coupling attenuation. The measurement uncertainty for coupling attenuation is ±6 db.

Page 48 of 49 6.1.9 DC loop resistance DC loop resistance is measured for each conductor in a pair. The loop resistance is calculated by adding the resistance of each conductor. The measured value is corrected for the temperature of the test object in order to obtain the resistance at 20 C. 6.1.10 Propagation delay Propagation delay is measured by determining the phase delay of a signal transmitted through the cable. δ = ϕ 2 π f where ϕ is the phase delay. f is the frequency in Hertz. The measurement uncertainty for delay is ±1%. 6.1.11 Delay skew Delay skew is calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum propagation delay over the four pairs at each frequency. The measurement uncertainty for skew is ±10%.

Page 49 of 49 6.1.12 Alien crosstalk tests Alien crosstalk was measured for the channel mounted in a six around one configuration. Alien crosstalk was obtained by measuring the S21 parameter with a network analyser. The channels were attached to baluns, which perform the asymmetric to symmetric conversion of the signal. The baluns were placed on a metallic ground plane. Alien NEXT was measured from the patch panel end of the channels. All pairs in the far end were terminated. The pairs not under test in the near end were terminated with loads providing differential and common mode termination. With one victim and 6 disturbers there are 96 different combinations, 24 for each victim pair. All 96 combinations were measured. For alien FEXT measurements the near end and far end of the measured pairs were terminated. Alien FEXT was measured as the coupling from the far end of the disturber to the near end of the victim. There are again 96 combinations. For each victim pair, power sum crosstalk was calculated as the power sum of 24 pair to pair results. The signal to noise ratio, due to alien FEXT (which is Power Sum Alien Attenuation to Crosstalk ratio Far end, PSAACR-F) was calculated by subtracting the measured attenuation of the victim channel (the disturbed pair) from the PS AFEXT. (This parameter was formerly called PSAELFEXT). Note: Values in graphs for alien crosstalk, which are lower than 85 db comes from the noise floor of the network analyzer. This noise floor has a jump at 15 MHz, which may be seen at some graphs. It has nothing to do with the performance of the sample under test. The measurement uncertainty for alien crosstalk measurements are the same as for NEXT measurements. 6.2 Test software Test software according to information in the table below is used for the conducted tests. Software name Function File name Version Date Cablingtotal Electrical cable tests Cabltot 3.96 060221 ECCalculate Calculated parameters ECCalculate 7 060904 ECReport Report Xreport 23.1 060727 Report programme Report Rapgen.xls 1.17 050125 DELTA Automatic Automatic word processing Rapport 1.5 060621 Reporting Program Cable report 2002 Cable report generation Cable report 3.2 060621