A NEW H-ALPHA SOLAR LIMB-PATROL SYSTEM* George Carroll. Lockheed Solar Observatory, Lockheed-California Co. Burbank, California

Similar documents
Applications of Optics

VISUAL PHYSICS ONLINE DEPTH STUDY: ELECTRON MICROSCOPES

PHYS 202 OUTLINE FOR PART III LIGHT & OPTICS

How to Photograph a Solar Eclipse

Performance Factors. Technical Assistance. Fundamental Optics

Chapter 25. Optical Instruments

Observational Astronomy

Chapter Ray and Wave Optics

INTRODUCTION THIN LENSES. Introduction. given by the paraxial refraction equation derived last lecture: Thin lenses (19.1) = 1. Double-lens systems

1.6 Beam Wander vs. Image Jitter

SUBJECT: PHYSICS. Use and Succeed.

Inverted-COR: Inverted-Occultation Coronagraph for Solar Orbiter

Chapter 36: diffraction

Focus on an optical blind spot A closer look at lenses and the basics of CCTV optical performances,

Lab 10: Lenses & Telescopes

Pinhole Camera. Nuts and Bolts

Diffraction Coronae. Ian Jacobs, Physics advisor, KVIS, Rayong, Thailand

Assignment 1 Examining the Solar Spectrum with a diffraction grating

25 cm. 60 cm. 50 cm. 40 cm.

PHOTOGRAPH OF SHADOW BANDS

Monochromator or graded spectrum filter?

Human Retina. Sharp Spot: Fovea Blind Spot: Optic Nerve

Transmission electron Microscopy

Physics 1230 Homework 8 Due Friday June 24, 2016

O5: Lenses and the refractor telescope

The Bellows Extension Exposure Factor: Including Useful Reference Charts for use in the Field

COST Short Term Scientific Missions Report 24 July 2014

Optics and Telescopes

COURSE NAME: PHOTOGRAPHY AND AUDIO VISUAL PRODUCTION (VOCATIONAL) FOR UNDER GRADUATE (FIRST YEAR)

Devices & Services Company

Be aware that there is no universal notation for the various quantities.

Astronomical Cameras

Exposure settings & Lens choices

SIMULATION OF NEURAL NETWORKS BY OPTICAL-PHOTOGR4PHIC METHODS. K. R. Shoulders

Effects of Photographic Gamma on Hologram Reconstructions*

Optics Laboratory Spring Semester 2017 University of Portland

Diffraction. modern investigations date from Augustin Fresnel

Topic 6 - Lens Filters: A Detailed Look

LEOK-3 Optics Experiment kit

Telescope Basics by Keith Beadman

Basic principles of photography. David Capel 346B IST

Physics 431 Final Exam Examples (3:00-5:00 pm 12/16/2009) TIME ALLOTTED: 120 MINUTES Name: Signature:

Testing Aspherics Using Two-Wavelength Holography

Phys 531 Lecture 9 30 September 2004 Ray Optics II. + 1 s i. = 1 f

Lecture 5. Telescopes (part II) and Detectors

What Are The Basic Part Of A Film Camera

Chapter 25 Optical Instruments

Lens Aperture. South Pasadena High School Final Exam Study Guide- 1 st Semester Photo ½. Study Guide Topics that will be on the Final Exam

12:40-2:40 3:00-4:00 PM

Refraction, Lenses, and Prisms

MONS Field Monitor. System Definition Phase. Design Report

Major Fabrication Steps in MOS Process Flow

Converging Lenses. Parallel rays are brought to a focus by a converging lens (one that is thicker in the center than it is at the edge).

EE119 Introduction to Optical Engineering Spring 2003 Final Exam. Name:

An integral eld spectrograph for the 4-m European Solar Telescope

Name: Date: Math in Special Effects: Try Other Challenges. Student Handout

Astrophotography for the Amateur

Basics of Light Microscopy and Metallography

Big League Cryogenics and Vacuum The LHC at CERN

ABC Math Student Copy. N. May ABC Math Student Copy. Physics Week 13(Sem. 2) Name. Light Chapter Summary Cont d 2

Adaptive Coronagraphy Using a Digital Micromirror Array

Solar Optical Telescope (SOT)

Aperture and Digi scoping. Thoughts on the value of the aperture of a scope digital camera combination.

Speed and Image Brightness uniformity of telecentric lenses

NANO 703-Notes. Chapter 9-The Instrument

PHY385H1F Introductory Optics. Practicals Session 7 Studying for Test 2

Exp No.(8) Fourier optics Optical filtering

Exam 4. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Lecture 15: Fraunhofer diffraction by a circular aperture

Chapter 34 Geometric Optics

ASTR130: Astro-Photography Lab. Orientation Session Spring 2009

BEAM HALO OBSERVATION BY CORONAGRAPH

Instructions. To run the slideshow:

PHY 431 Homework Set #5 Due Nov. 20 at the start of class

Section A Conceptual and application type questions. 1 Which is more observable diffraction of light or sound? Justify. (1)

Will contain image distance after raytrace Will contain image height after raytrace

Tangents. The f-stops here. Shedding some light on the f-number. by Marcus R. Hatch and David E. Stoltzmann

Using Machine Vision Cameras for Solar Imaging. Dr Stuart Green

End-of-Chapter Exercises

Lecture 4: Geometrical Optics 2. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Rays. Wavefronts. Aberrations. Outline

Reading: Lenses and Mirrors; Applications Key concepts: Focal points and lengths; real images; virtual images; magnification; angular magnification.

Chapter Wave Optics. MockTime.com. Ans: (d)

lens Figure 1. A refractory focusing arrangement. Focal point

The New. Astronomy. 2 Practical Focusing

Why is There a Black Dot when Defocus = 1λ?

"Internet Telescope" Performance Requirements

Option G 2: Lenses. The diagram below shows the image of a square grid as produced by a lens that does not cause spherical aberration.

Autofocus Problems The Camera Lens

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Binocular and Scope Performance 57. Diffraction Effects

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Laser Diode Mounting Kits

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy

Image Formation Fundamentals

High Contrast Imaging

SIPS instructions for installation and use

The following article is a translation of parts of the original publication of Karl-Ludwig Bath in the german astronomical magazine:

NanoSpective, Inc Progress Drive Suite 137 Orlando, Florida

MSE 595T Transmission Electron Microscopy. Laboratory III TEM Imaging - I

Transcription:

A NEW H-ALPHA SLAR LIMB-PATRL SYSTEM* George Carroll Lockheed Solar bservatory, Lockheed-California Co. Burbank, California This paper describes in detail a new hydrogen-alpha solar limb patrol now in successful operation at the Lockheed Solar bservatory. The system is designed to add a properly exposed photographic record of all observable prominence actions extending above the sun s limb to the existing standard disk record. For various reasons, photographic records of flare-associated prominence actions have been difficult to obtain on a patrol basis. Visually a 0.5 Â bandpass biréfringent filter centered on Ha will show excellent solar disk detail and acceptable limb detail at lower intensity. However, photographically, because of this much lower intensity, limb prominence activity will not show unless the exposure is increased to the extent that the disk image is then greatly overexposed (by about a factor of ten). It has been clearly demonstrated in time-lapse prominence studies at various solar observatories (particularly the Sacramento Peak bservatory and the High Altitude bservatory) that a 4 to 8 Â bandpass filter used with a coronagraph will show the largest percentage of active prominence motions. A filter of less than 4 Â bandpass will frequently fail to pass the strongly Doppler-shifted components of prominence action. Certainly a 0.5 Â filter is too narrow for recording the dynamic flareassociated prominence actions. Solar astronomers, realizing the importance of recording solar prominence activity simultaneously with disk activity, have devised several systems to attain this end. The most successful of these systems (in use by the High Altitude bservatory and the CSIR, Sydney, Australia) is one in which the two outside polaroids of a 0.5 Â Ha filter are mechanically removed and replaced by clear glass to maintain focus, and a metal occulting * Presented at the Sail Diego meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, June 12-13, 1963. 431

432 GERGE CARRLL disk is then inserted at the first image plane. The film, after previous exposures to the disk with the 0.5 Â bandpass, is then re-exposed to record prominences with the 2 Â bandpass (resulting from removal of the outside polaroids). The occulting disk permits use of the broader bandpass as well as preventing any further disk exposure. At the Lockheed bservatory it was felt that such a complicated electro-mechanical device would be impractical for a solar patrol that must operate almost entirely unattended for long periods of time. The writer therefore began a study of several possible methods which would accomplish the desired results and still remain simple and reliable. The combination solar-prominence and flare telescope described here is the result. It should be remembered, however, that this system was designed to fit into a flare-patrol system already in use and cannot be considered the best possible mechanical design for a combination flare and prominence patrol. The system is, in effect, two complete systems which are almost identical optically. System A is a conventional coronagraph without an occulting disk and is used to produce the disk image through a 0.5 Â biréfringent filter. System B is a conventional coronagraph with an occulting disk and is utilized to form an annular image of the chromosphere and limb through a 4 Â interference filter. There are no moving parts, and the two images are optically combined to be recorded simultaneously with a single exposure on the same film plane as shown in Plate I. A study of the schematic diagram in Plate II will assist the reader in following the detailed description of the system. The three unique features of the system are readily apparent : ( 1 ) The use of a 4 Â interference filter in system B passes ten times as much Ha light as the 0.5 Â biréfringent filter of system A (permitting a single photographic exposure of shortest possible duration for both images). (2) Two 45 mirrors are used to bring the limb image of system B to the final image plane. Note that the 45 mirror located back of the filter in system A has a hole cut through it at 45. This hole is just large enough to clear the light beam that forms the disk image. (3) System B

PLATE I A typical picture from the Lockheed solar patrol telescope, showing disk and limb through a 0.5 Â Halle filter, and second larger limb through a 4Â interference filter.

PLATE II ptical diagram of the combination solar-prominence and flare telescope.

cj r Tn > PLATE III T! ös v 73 U <u as <n G V-> rt CJ <D SS <u G î-.. *0 CJ n in ai u, v ai M I V JS H jo S <u JS -*-» Vi eö <u G CJ U as S CJ v -*-> c3 j-, 04 5. t_h S Cvi I ' in i I n C/3 >, t-n j-- eu * N JS

> h I w H < J PP T3 <V en 'S - d 2 JG a; <u > *- +3 <ü a y G G u (U <ü U.S d <u qg bû s _ u PP JS &

SLAR LIMB-PATRL SYSTEM 433 forms an annulus of the solar limb approximately 10% larger than the disk at the final image plane. In this way the beam is large enough to strike mirror No. 1 outside of the hole area. This results in a double presentation of limb phenomena, making flare recognition easier for integration with prominence activity in the same region. Because system B is the new system and the point of this paper, the following description and comments will be largely confined to it. The ray paths shown by the diagram are those that form the solar limb region. The occulting disk is placed at the first image plane, for most efficient eclipsing of the disk, and also to prevent excessive heat from getting beyond this point. (System A requires a heat-reflecting element just back of the stop to remove heat from its beam.) In both systems, the stop is placed at a point where the objective lens is imaged by the field lens. This effectively blocks stray light and maintains best contrast and image quality. The optical train is designed and adjusted so that the solar annulus and occulting disk will both be in focus at the final image plane. The second objective or imaging lens directs the rays through the filter at the smallest possible angle since this is the condition for best filter performance. Back of the second objective lens Y a 45 mirror (No. 2) is placed to direct the light through the 8 Â multi-layer interference filter. The beam then passes through a converging lens to the No. 1 45 mirror and then to position on the film plane. The interference filter, mirrors Nos. 1 and 2, and the converging lens should be as close to the final image plane as mechanically possible, since the success of the system is strongly dependent upon the images being very nearly in focus as they pass mirror No. 1. Final exposure balance of the two systems is best achieved by adjusting the size of the stop openings. Since optical alignment is critical, it is desirable to build the system so that each element can be adjusted and aligned individually. Both mirrors must be fully adjustable and aligned to produce a perfectly circular annulus. Experience indicates that it is advantageous to mount as many components as possible in units, minimizing the alignment problems of the two systems. An easily

434 GERGE CARRLL removable cover for the system provides protection and easy access for frequent cleaning of the optics. A number of occulting disks are required to compensate for the annual variation in size of the solar image. The choice of occulting disk size is strongly dependent upon three criteria: (1) performance of the solar guider, (2) average seeing conditions, and (3) tendency of the filter to produce reflection and diffraction rings. Certainly the smallest occulting disk permissible is one that passes as much chromosphere as possible but effectively blocks all photospheric light; consequently a good solar guiding system is a primary requisite. The parameters of the lenses used for the Lockheed prominence system are given here for reference purposes only, and were chosen to be compatible with the existing system. bjective: 4-inch aperture, 78-inch focal length; field and objective lens: 2-inch aperture, 11.75-inch focal length; converging lens: l^-inch aperture, 9-inch focal length; hole in mirror No. 2: 0.78-inch diameter. Two operational disadvantages of this combined prominenceand flare-patrol system should be discussed. First, the low contrast of solar disk phenomena in Ha necessitates using a rather high-contrast film (Eastman IV-E), and the shorter dynamic range of this film makes it less desirable for photographing prominences than the Eastman 103-Ha film. f course, the unique double presentation of the limb in this system partially compensates for this and allows easy separation of limb flares from fainter prominence actions (Plates III and IV). The second disadvantage of the combined system is the much higher dependence of the limb system (owing to the wider bandpass filter) upon clear sky conditions. In observing periods when the sky is very bright or clouds very frequent, the limb system should be blocked out to avoid the possibility of adding scattered light to the solar disk image. In practice, this has not been a serious disadvantage, and it has been necessary to block out the limb system only during rare cloud conditions that produce very strong red scatter (thin cirrus clouds).

SLAR LIMB-PATRL SYSTEM 435 The advantages such a system offers are : 1. No moving parts, minimizing the need for frequent adjustment of critical components such as occulting-disk position. 2. Single photographic exposure of shortest possible duration for both activities, with adequate exposure of low-intensity limb events. 3. Double presentation of limb phenomena if the limb-patrol image is purposely larger than the disk image. This makes limb flare recognition easier for integration with prominence activity in the same region. 4. The broader bandpass of the separate limb-patrol filter enhances the possibility of recording strongly Dopplershifted components of prominence activity.