Research Support. Dual-Source CT: What is it and How Do I Test it? Cynthia H. McCollough, Ph.D.

Similar documents
12/21/2016. Siemens Medical Systems Research Agreement Philips Healthcare Research Agreement AAN and ASN Committees

Software and Hardware in CCTA. Elly Castellano PhD

Pitfalls and Remedies of MDCT Scanners as Quantitative Instruments

HISTORY. CT Physics with an Emphasis on Application in Thoracic and Cardiac Imaging SUNDAY. Shawn D. Teague, MD

TOPICS: CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of Patient Age & Size and for Different CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY 1

Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality and Dose Issues in MSCT. Scanner parameters affecting IQ and Dose

diagnostic examination

Wide-Detector CT for TAVR Planning:

Automated dose control in multi-slice CT. Nicholas Keat Formerly ImPACT, St George's Hospital, London

1. Patient size AEC. Large Patient High ma. Small Patient Low ma

160-slice CT SCANNER / New Standard for the Future

QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner

Translating Protocols Between Scanner Manufacturer and Model

Dose Reduction in Helical CT: Dynamically Adjustable z-axis X-Ray Beam Collimation

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3 ACR CT Accreditation. Multi-Slice CT Artifacts and Quality Control. What are the rules or recommendations for CT QC?

Detector technology in simultaneous spectral imaging

QC by the MPE in Belgium

Overview of Safety Code 35

Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space. Answers for life.

Multislice CT: Current Technology and Future Developments

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Focal Spot Blooming in CT: We Didn t Know We Had a Problem Until We Had a Solution

Electronic Noise in CT Detectors: Impact on Image Noise and Artifacts

NeuViz 16 Computed Tomography. Elevating routine imaging for exceptional results

Suppression of metal artifacts using image-based monoenergetic DECT imaging

Measurement of table feed speed in modern CT

abc MHRA Philips Mx8000 IDT CT scanner technical evaluation September 2004 Best choice best practice nww.medical-devices.nhs.

SOMATOM Esprit A Bundle of Energy

Breast Tomosynthesis. Bob Liu, Ph.D. Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital And Harvard Medical School

Inside Biograph mct.

CHAPTER 2 COMMISSIONING OF KILO-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY

Features and Weaknesses of Phantoms for CR/DR System Testing

SAFIRE. Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction. Answers for life.

Data. microcat +SPECT

TORNIER BLUEPRINT. 3D Planning + PSI SCAN PROTOCOL

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp

7/24/2014. Image Quality for the Radiation Oncology Physicist: Review of the Fundamentals and Implementation. Disclosures. Outline

Computed Tomography. The Fundamentals of... THE FUNDAMENTALS OF... Jason H. Launders, MSc. Current Technology

SOMATOM Sensation 4 Computed Tomography System for Multislice Spiral Scanning

A comparison of two methods for the determination of freein-air geometric efficiency in MDCT

Authors: Cabral, Ricardo 1 ; Carvoeiras, Pedro 2 ; Fatana, João 2, ; Alves, Rita 1. 1 Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte - Hospital de Santa Maria; 2

Yinsheng Li 1, Peter Bannas 2, M.D., Perry Pickhardt M.D. 2, Meghan Lubner M.D. 2, Ke Li Ph.D. 1,2, and Guang-Hong Chen Ph.D. 1,2

Radiology Physics Lectures: Digital Radiography. Digital Radiography. D. J. Hall, Ph.D. x20893

Maximizing clinical outcomes

Maximum Performance, Minimum Space

Data. Take the Lead in CT SOMATOM Sensation 64

DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook

Clinical Experience Using the Open Bore Multislice CT System Supria (16 slice CT) MEDIX VOL. 61 P.8 P.11

Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models

Redefining Ergonomics

Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT With Additional Tin Filtration: Dose and Image Quality Evaluation in Phantoms and In Vivo

Improvement of CT image quality with iterative reconstruction idose4

T h e P h a n t o m L a b o r a t o r y

Introduction. Chapter 16 Diagnostic Radiology. Primary radiological image. Primary radiological image

Enhanced Functionality of High-Speed Image Processing Engine SUREengine PRO. Sharpness (spatial resolution) Graininess (noise intensity)

Mammography: Physics of Imaging

Brilliance in everything Philips CT products and services

FOREWORD. Acknowledgements

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 188: Multi-energy CT Images

CT Basics: Image Quality Module 6

computed tomography, computed tomography dose index, dosimetry

RaySafe X2. Effortless measurements of X-ray

Industry Breakthrough

Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia

of sufficient quality and quantity

COCIR SELF-REGULATORY INITIATIVE FOR MEDICAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MEASUREMENT OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Exposure in Dental Radiology: A Comparison Between Intra-oral, Panoramic and Tomographic Examinations

PET/CT Instrumentation Basics

Industry Breakthrough

CT Basics: Data Acquisition Module 3

Architecture of Quality Imaging Mary K. Henne, MS, CNMT, RDMS, RVT Ultrasound Education Specialist GE Healthcare

Truly flexible to meet your clinical needs

Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding

The disclaimer on page 1 is an integral part of this document. Copyright November 30, 2017 by AAPM. All rights reserved.

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them?

2D, 3D CT Intervention, and CT Fluoroscopy

Preclinical X-Ray Computed Tomography

Wide beam CT dosimetry. Elly Castellano

Report to 64 slice CT scanner comparison report version 13. September Health and social care working together.

CT Scanner Dose Survey

Diffraction-enhanced X-ray Imaging (DEXI) Medical Solutions. More information using less radiation

Disclosures. Outline 7/31/2017. Current Implementation Status of IEC Standard : Exposure Index (EI) for Digital Radiography

Influence of different iteration levels in fourth generation iterative reconstruction technique on image noise in CT examinations of the neck

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 188: Multi-energy CT Images

Quality control of Gamma Camera. By Dr/ Ibrahim Elsayed Saad 242 NMT

Multi-Access Biplane Lab

CT Basics: Computed Tomography Fundamentals Module 1

Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology

Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit

K-edge subtraction X-ray imaging with a pixellated spectroscopic detector

Current technology in digital image production (CR/DR and other modalities) Jaroonroj Wongnil 25 Mar 2016

DOUBLE gated in vivo small animal cone beam micro

X-ray Tube and Generator Basic principles and construction

Reducing Radiation Exposure from Survey CT Scans

The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality

Cardiac MR. Dr John Ridgway. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK

The Most Popular CT in the World *

Photomultiplier Tube

Transcription:

Dual-Source CT: What is it and How Do I Test it? Cynthia H. McCollough, Ph.D. CT Clinical Innovation Center Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester, MN Research Support National Institute of Health EB04898, CA75333, AR27065, HR46158 Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute Siemens Medical Solutions Bayer Healthcare RTI Electronics Tube A: 50 cm FOV Tube B: 26 cm FOV Each tube/detector pair has: 80 kw generator 32 x 0.6 mm detector array Double z sampling with Z-FFS No gantry tilt Tube A: 50 cm FOV Tube B: 26 cm FOV

I. Single Tube Operation - Performs Same as a Sensation 64 Temporal Resolution = Rotation Time 2 = 330 ms 2 = 165 ms II. Dual Tube Operation - x 2 Improved Temporal Resolution Temporal Resolution = Rotation Time 4 = 330 ms 4 = 83 ms 83 ms vs. 165 ms (same raw data, same phase) Dual tube recon Single tube recon RCA LAD RCA Mean HR=90 bpm LAD

125 ms 82 ms 165 ms Dose Continuous irradiation (spiral acquisition) with two x-ray tubes would double the radiation dose Four dose reduction strategies: Cardiac beam shaping filter (bowtie filter) 3-D adaptive noise filtration Variable pitch values (based on heart rate) ECG-pulsing with arrhythmia detection and adjustable temporal windows 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 McCollough et al., Radiology 243(3):775-784 (2007) MDCT DSCT MDCT pulsed DSCT 310 ms DSCT 210 ms DSCT 110 ms 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 No ECG pulsing 0.2 0.265 0.36 0.46 No ECG No ECG No ECG Pulsing pulsing Pulsing pulsing Pulsing pulsing Pulsing <55 55-70 70-90 >90 Heart Rate (bpm) III. Dual Source (Obese) Mode Use both tubes at same kv to double the available power to 160 kw Reconstructed images are the SUMMATION of Tube A and B Avoids need to trade off exam speed (pitch) or narrow slices (collimation) for photon flux Allows much higher mas for Obese patients 80 kvp imaging

IV. Material Specific Imaging Use each tube at a different kv to exploit the kv-dependent nature of CT # 80kV Bone 670 HU Iodine 296 HU Applications of Dual-Energy CT Iodine imaging Automated bone removal in CT angiography Plaque removal Blood pool imaging (Perfused blood volume) Soft tissue imaging Enhanced visualization of tendons & ligaments Virtual non-contrast (Iodine removal) Bone 450 HU Iodine 144 HU 140kV Dose reduction Material characterization TR Johnson et al. Eur Radiology 17(6):1510-1517 (2007)

Applications of Dual-Energy CT Iodine imaging Automated bone removal in CT angiography Plaque removal Blood pool imaging (Perfused blood volume) Soft tissue imaging Enhanced visualization of tendons & ligaments Virtual non-contrast (Iodine removal) Dose reduction Material characterization Direct subtraction of bone in complicated anatomical regions Courtesy of University Hospital of Munich - Grosshadern / Munich, Germany Applications of Dual-Energy CT Iodine imaging Automated bone removal in CT angiography Plaque removal Blood pool imaging (Perfused blood volume) Soft tissue imaging Enhanced visualization of tendons & ligaments Virtual non-contrast (Iodine removal) Dose reduction Material characterization Contrast enhanced - Nephrographic phase DE image from same scan Virtual non-contrast O. Dzyubak, Tuesday 2:42 pm, Rm L100J

Implications for Performance Testing Image Quality Single source mode: No change from any MDCT Dual source cardiac mode: optional Use demo ECG mode Coronary CTA: 120 kvp, 240 mas/rot, 0.33 sec, 32x0.6, pitch auto selected, 3 mm, B26f, retrospectively-gated spiral mode ACR phantom: CT number accuracy Large (> 30 cm diameter) water or uniform acrylic phantom Uniformity and noise in axial and coronal images mas/rot represents mas sum from both tubes (not effective mas = mas/pitch) Implications for Performance Testing Image Quality Dual source non-cardiac (obese) mode: Optional Average image (0.5 Tube A + 0.5 Tube B) Obese XXL: 120 kvp, 300 eff. mas, 0.5 s, 24x1.2 mm, pitch < 1.0, 5 mm, B20f, spiral ACR phantom: CT number accuracy Large (> 30 cm) water or uniform acrylic phantom Uniformity and noise in axial and coronal images Implications for Performance Testing Image Quality Dual energy mode: Suggested Mixed image (0.3 80 kv + 0.7 140 kv) DE abdomen: 140/80 kvp, 95/400 eff. mas, 0.5 s, 14x1.2 mm, pitch < 0.7, 5 mm, D30f, spiral ACR CT phantom: CT number accuracy Fat (polyethylene) and bone (Teflon) expected to have different CT numbers relative to 120 kvp Check accuracy of water and air CT numbers Large (> 30 cm) water or uniform acrylic phantom Uniformity and noise in axial and coronal images Implications for Performance Testing Dose Must test both tubes, recommend to do separately Tube A: No change from any MDCT CTDIw in head and body phantoms for routine head and body CTDIair for all collimations at routine kvp CTDIair for all kvp settings at routine collimation IEC 61223-2-6-Ed2 (Constancy Testing) Tube B: Fewer collimations available HVL for both tubes at acceptance testing (required after any tube chance in some states) Change of one tube does NOT affect other tube Doses are additive

Body Dose Measurement (Body CTDI phantom, Body filter) 80kVp 100kVp 120kVp 140kVp 2x1 1x5 1x10 14x1.2 24x1.2 32x0.6 CTDIw 32x0.6(UHR) AT (A,B) UHR =Ultra highresolution focalspot. AT = acceptance test only. QC = AT + scheduled QC or after tube change Cardiac Dose Measurement (Body CTDI phantom, Head filter) 80kVp 100kVp 120kVp 140kVp 2x1 1x5 1x10 24x1.2 32x0.6 CTDIw 32x0.6(UHR) AT (A,B) UHR =Ultra highresolution focalspot. AT = acceptance test only. QC = AT + scheduled QC or after tube change Head Dose Measurement (Head CTDI phantom, Head filter) 80kVp 100kVp 120kVp 140kVp 2x1 1x5 1x10 14x1.2 24x1.2 32x0.6 CTDIw 32x0.6(UHR) AT (A,B) UHR =Ultra highresolution focalspot. AT = acceptance test only. QC = AT + scheduled QC or after tube change

Mayo CT Clinic Innovation Center and Dept. of Radiology L Yu, MR Bruesewitz, JM Kofler, AN Primak, AP Dzyubak, X Liu JG Fletcher, TJ Vrtiska, EE Williamson, JF Breen, DM Hough Additional Reference: Flohr, TG et al., European Radiology 16:256-268 (2006)