AST Lab exercise: CCD

Similar documents
AST Lab exercise: aberrations

Errata to First Printing 1 2nd Edition of of The Handbook of Astronomical Image Processing

Properties of a Detector

Astronomy 341 Fall 2012 Observational Astronomy Haverford College. CCD Terminology

CCD Characteristics Lab

CCD reductions techniques

Pixel Response Effects on CCD Camera Gain Calibration

Properties of CCD #4. installed in dewar no. 2. Operated as HiRAC science camera. Anton Norup Srensen & Michael I. Andersen

Examination, TEN1, in courses SK2500/SK2501, Physics of Biomedical Microscopy,

In situ CCD testing. T. M. C. Abbott. 24 May Abstract. This document describes a number of methods of CCD testing which may be used

Project 1 Gain of a CCD

X-ray Spectroscopy Laboratory Suresh Sivanandam Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto

Detectors for microscopy - CCDs, APDs and PMTs. Antonia Göhler. Nov 2014

Camera Test Protocol. Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS. Camera Test Protocol Technical Note Technical Note

INTRODUCTION TO CCD IMAGING

Single Photon Interference Katelynn Sharma and Garrett West University of Rochester, Institute of Optics, 275 Hutchison Rd. Rochester, NY 14627

Lab #1: X-ray Photon Counting & the Statistics of Light Lab report is due Wednesday, October 11, 2017, before 11:59 pm EDT

Photometry. Variable Star Photometry

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS APRIL II 1996, PAGE 367

Exercise questions for Machine vision

Thermography. White Paper: Understanding Infrared Camera Thermal Image Quality

WFC3 TV3 Testing: IR Channel Nonlinearity Correction

The Noise about Noise

Low Light Level CCD Performance and Issues

Padova and Asiago Observatories

Project 1 Gain of a CCD

Chair. Table. Robot. Laser Spot. Fiber Grating. Laser

CHARGE-COUPLED DEVICE (CCD)

BASLER A601f / A602f

Project 1 Gain and noise of a CCD camera

Charged-Coupled Devices

MAOP-702. CCD 47 Characterization

University of Wisconsin Chemistry 524 Spectroscopic Components *

X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

ECEN. Spectroscopy. Lab 8. copy. constituents HOMEWORK PR. Figure. 1. Layout of. of the

MTF and PSF measurements of the CCD detector for the Euclid visible channel

FRAUNHOFER AND FRESNEL DIFFRACTION IN ONE DIMENSION

Charge Coupled Devices. C. A. Griffith, Class Notes, PTYS 521, 2016 Not for distribution.

Evaluation of the Foveon X3 sensor for astronomy

LACERTA M-GEN Stand-Alone AutoGuider

A Quantix monochrome camera with a Kodak KAF6303E CCD 2-D array was. characterized so that it could be used as a component of a multi-channel visible

Lecture 30: Image Sensors (Cont) Computer Graphics and Imaging UC Berkeley CS184/284A

THE CALIBRATION OF THE OPTICAL IMAGER FOR THE HOKU KEA TELESCOPE. Jamie L. H. Scharf Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawai i at Hilo Hilo, HI 96720

The DSI for Autostar Suite

product overview pco.edge family the most versatile scmos camera portfolio on the market pioneer in scmos image sensor technology

PoS(PhotoDet 2012)058

Narrow band lters. 1 Filters characteristics. I. Rodríguez and O. Lehmkuhl. January 8, FWHM or bandpass

Physics 2310 Lab #5: Thin Lenses and Concave Mirrors Dr. Michael Pierce (Univ. of Wyoming)

2013 LMIC Imaging Workshop. Sidney L. Shaw Technical Director. - Light and the Image - Detectors - Signal and Noise

THE CCD RIDDLE REVISTED: SIGNAL VERSUS TIME LINEAR SIGNAL VERSUS VARIANCE NON-LINEAR

pco.edge 4.2 LT 0.8 electrons 2048 x 2048 pixel 40 fps up to :1 up to 82 % pco. low noise high resolution high speed high dynamic range

Basler ral km. Camera Specification. Measurement protocol using the EMVA Standard 1288 Document Number: BD Version: 01

FLAT FIELD DETERMINATIONS USING AN ISOLATED POINT SOURCE

Understanding Infrared Camera Thermal Image Quality

Very short introduction to light microscopy and digital imaging

Image acquisition. In both cases, the digital sensing element is one of the following: Line array Area array. Single sensor

Observing*Checklist:*A3ernoon*

What an Observational Astronomer needs to know!

Basler aca640-90gm. Camera Specification. Measurement protocol using the EMVA Standard 1288 Document Number: BD Version: 02

SARG: The Graphical User Interface Manual

Acquisition. Some slides from: Yung-Yu Chuang (DigiVfx) Jan Neumann, Pat Hanrahan, Alexei Efros

UXGA CMOS Image Sensor

ULS24 Frequently Asked Questions

CHAPTER 9 POSITION SENSITIVE PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES

Photometry of the variable stars using CCD detectors

4.5.1 Mirroring Gain/Offset Registers GPIO CMV Snapshot Control... 14

BaySpec SuperGamut OEM

Controlling Lady Beetles at the Martin Observatory

Physics 2310 Lab #6: Multiple Thin Lenses Dr. Michael Pierce (Univ. of Wyoming)

Low light electron multiplying image sensors modeling and characterization : Study of the EMCMOS concept. Timothée Brugière

Speckle disturbance limit in laserbased cinema projection systems

Camera Requirements For Precision Agriculture

E19 PTC and 4T APS. Cristiano Rocco Marra 20/12/2017

The design and testing of a small scale solar flux measurement system for central receiver plant

WEBCAMS UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT

Single Photon Interference Laboratory

The. FIES Camera. equipped with E2V CCD B83, ser. no Pre-commissioning characterisation

Innovative measurement instruments from

The new CMOS Tracking Camera used at the Zimmerwald Observatory

Basler aca gm. Camera Specification. Measurement protocol using the EMVA Standard 1288 Document Number: BD Version: 01

Measuring with Interference and Diffraction

Noise Analysis of AHR Spectrometer Author: Andrew Xiang

TOSHIBA CCD LINEAR IMAGE SENSOR CCD(Charge Coupled Device) TCD1208AP

TCD1711DG TCD1711DG. Features. Pin Connection (top view) Maximum Ratings (Note 1)

SEAMS DUE TO MULTIPLE OUTPUT CCDS

Be aware that there is no universal notation for the various quantities.

Everything you always wanted to know about flat-fielding but were afraid to ask*

Presented by Jerry Hubbell Lake of the Woods Observatory (MPC I24) President, Rappahannock Astronomy Club

Preliminary Characterization Results: Fiber-Coupled, Multi-channel, Hyperspectral Spectrographs

CMOS Star Tracker: Camera Calibration Procedures

Camera Requirements For Precision Agriculture

IT FR R TDI CCD Image Sensor

Determination of the STIS CCD Gain

ARRAY CONTROLLER REQUIREMENTS

Control of Noise and Background in Scientific CMOS Technology

Astronomical Detectors. Lecture 3 Astronomy & Astrophysics Fall 2011

Nolan Rebernick, Kyle Montgomery, and Kenneth Walz Quantifying Electroluminescence Image Data for Multijunction Solar Cells

Electron Multiplying Charge Coupled Devices. Craig Mackay, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge.

Using double-exposure holographic techniques to evaluate the deformation of an aluminum can under stress

Fully depleted, thick, monolithic CMOS pixels with high quantum efficiency

Transcription:

AST2210 - Lab exercise: CCD 1 Introduction In this project we will study the performance of a standard CCD, similar to those used in astronomical observations. In particular, the exercise will take you through the basics of operating a CCD cameras, recording data and analyzing the images afterwards. The current text describes how to do this in IDL, an interactive language commonly used in astronomical analysis, but you are free to use whatever programming language you prefer, as long as you know how to perform equivalent tasks in that language. In the report, pretend that you are the inventor of CCDs, and describe how these can be used for and revolutionize astronomical applications! 2 Camera usage In the rst exercise you will use a color Edmund Optics USB camera in a set-up with a white light lamp, a thin singlet lens and a microscope objective. Connect the camera to the computer and start the `camera viewer' program from the desktop. Start the camera by pressing `mount camera', see gure 1. Start the white light lamp you should now see an image of the white light source. Exercise 1 Open `histogram', `value on horizontal line', and `camera properties'. Experiment with the three settings as seen on gure 2. Describe what happens to the image when adjusting each of them and explain what you see. Exercise 2 Change the focus position of the microscope objective. Describe what happens. Try to reach maximum counts for each color (with xed exposure time) and note down the values. Is the maximum counts the same for each color? 1

Figure 1: Graphical User Interface for the camera viewer program. Figure 2: Camera properties. 2

3 Camera properties In this exercise you will use the monochromatic Edmund Optics USB camera in a set-up with the laser and a 100µm slit. In this set-up we have to use the laser without dampening lter. If the camera gets directly exposed by the laser, the sensor will be damaged. Only in combination with the slit the light level is not harmful for the sensor. Therefore, do not remove the slit before you have switched o the laser and closed the camera cover. You will store images that will be used for more detailed analysis using IDL in the next exercise. Use a USB memory stick to save the images you need. You can use the Windows machine in the terminal room 116 on the ground oor to upload your data to your home directory. The images from the Edmund Optics USB cameras are saved as bitmaps, extension.bmp, and can be imported into IDL. Exercise 3 Use the diraction pattern in the live view of the camera to measure the width in µm of the pixels of the sensor and calculate the uncertainty in your measurement. Use the formula for single-slit diraction a sin(θ) = mλ, where a is the slit width, and m the order of the minimum. To record a proper image, one needs to make sure that the image is well exposed the signal level should be as high as possible in order to minimize noise but one should avoid over-exposure. One should avoid to get too close to the maximum exposure level in order to avoid non-linear behavior of the sensor. Exercise 4 Record a well exposed image of the diraction pattern. Note the exposure time, frame rate and pixel clock of this image. Standard operations to process raw images are corrections for bias, dark current, and at eld. The bias level is measured in total darkness and with the shortest exposure time possible. One would expect this level to correspond to a pixel value of 0 but in practice this level is set to a small value to account for digitization noise. In theory, the bias level should be identical for each pixel since no photoelectrons nor thermal electrons are generated. In reality, the bias level varies from pixel to pixel caused by various sources of noise. A dark current is generated during integration due to generation of thermal electrons. The dark current is measured by blocking the light and exposing with the same integration time as the data that is to be corrected. Flateld correction compensates for sensitivity variations over the eld of view. These sensitivity variations are due to pixel-to-pixel variations of the quantum eciency a uniform ood of photons on the sensor generates a dif- 3

ferent number of electrons for the dierent pixels. In addition, large scale variations in the sensitivity are caused by imperfections in the optical system such as uneven illumination and dust at various optical surfaces. A at-eld frame records the response of the entire optical system to a uniform (or at) eld of light. Whereas correcting for bias and dark current is trivial and straightforward, obtaining a good at eld can be a dicult and involved process. It is often not trivial to have a feature-less eld of light going through the same optical path as for the science observations. You will now record a number of bias, dark and at exposures that will be used for further analysis in IDL. Exercise 5 After switching o the laser and putting the dust cover on the camera, remove the slit from the beam. Then record calibration data as follows: Record 2 bias frames by turning down the exposure time to the minimum value. Record 5 dark frames with the same exposure time as in (3). Record a dark frame at the maximum exposure time. Remove the dust cover of the camera. Now we record a very basic type at eld image: use a white paper to reect light from the ceiling into the camera. Make sure the at image is well exposed by adjusting the integration time so that the average pixel value is between halfway to onethird to the maximum output of the camera. Record 16 ateld images and note the exposure time. Close the dust cover and record 5 dark frames at the same exposure time as the ats. 3.1 Image analysis in IDL Exercise 6 Load one bias frame and the dark frame with maximum exposure time into IDL use the IDL routine read_bmp. Compare the two images: compute average, minimum and maximum pixel values, plot histograms of the pixel values and view the images on the screen. Is there much dierence between these frames? Locate the pixel with maximum counts in pixel coordinates (x, y) for both the bias and the dark frame. Are they the same? Exercise 7 Load both bias frames, B 1 and B 2. Add them together and measure the mean 4

value of the central square region, 300 pixels on a side. The mean value is the quantity B 1 + B 2. Next, subtract one bias frame from the other, and measure the standard deviation for the central region. Exercise 8 Subtracting the two bias frames removes any xed bias patterns, leaving just the noise from the two bias frames σ B1 B 2, which is 2 times the noise of one bias frame. Exercise 9 Do the same for two at frames: compute for the central region the noise in two at frames σ F1 F 2. F 1 + F 2 and We have measured the mean of a signal level and the noise as its standard deviation in pixel counts, or analog-to-digital Units (ADU). There is a conversion factor g that relates 1 ADU to the number of actually measured electrons. Because one expects the signal to display Poisson statistics measured in electrons, one expects σ electrons = F electrons. Since both σ and F have been multiplied by the conversion factor, we have actually measured gσ electrons = gf electrons. Solving for g: g = F electrons σelectrons 2 [electrons/adu]. (1) Correcting for the bias and noise related to the bias: g = ( F 1 + F 2 ) ( B 1 + B 2 ) (σ 2 F 1 F 2 ) (σ 2 B 1 B 2 ) [electrons/adu]. (2) Exercise 10 Compute the conversion factor g. Exercise 11 The only source of noise in a bias frame should be the readout noise. Compute the readout noise in electrons. Exercise 12 You have recorded 16 at frames. Use these at frames to see how the normalised noise decreases by adding frames. Compute successively σ F1 F 2, σ (F1+F 3) (F 2+F 4), σ (F1+F 3+F 5) (F 2+F 4+F 6),... until you have used all at frames. Plot these values normalised by the number of frames used (divide by the number of pairs) and see that the noise decreases how you expect. Exercise 13 Load the image with the diraction pattern from exercise (3). View the image and identify patterns that could be attributed to imperfections in the optical 5

path and that should be removed by ateld correction. Construct a "master" at by (1) averaging all at exposures F average, (2) averaging all corresponding darks D average, and (3) normalizing F average D average to its average. Correct the diraction image by rst correcting for dark current and then dividing by the master normalized at. Do you see any improvement? What is the basic aw in constructing a at eld the way we did? 4 Report The report should contain an explanation of how you did each exercise, with necessary gures and images etc. included in the report. Exercises 1-5 will be performed in the lab, while the rest can be done later. 6