Ofcom were asked to provide assistance with this study as they have the necessary expertise and equipment to make the measurements.

Similar documents
ITU/WMO Seminar Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology: Weather, Water and Climate Monitoring and Prediction

Vaisala DigiCORA Sounding System

DTT COVERAGE PREDICTIONS AND MEASUREMENT

Adjacent Channel DVB-H Interference into Analogue PAL Television

Title: Test on 5.8 GHz Band Outdoor WiFi (802.11b/g) Wireless Base Station

Version TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION

Spurious Emissions & Emission Mark Report

ECC Report 276. Thresholds for the coordination of CDMA and LTE broadband systems in the 400 MHz band

Antennas: Problems and exercises: Answers

Interference criteria for meteorological aids operated in the MHz and MHz bands

Determining radiosonde maximum interference levels from link analysis and flight studies

Experimental Study on Protection Distance between Analog TV and Digital TV in Adjacent UHF Frequency Bands at Terrestrial Television

NXDN Signal and Interference Contour Requirements An Empirical Study

Screening Attenuation When enough is enough

FCC Test Report. Report No.: AGC FE02 CLIENT : INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS AND DESIGN LLC. Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

Measurement Procedure & Test Equipment Used

Protection of fixed monitoring stations against interference from nearby or strong transmitters

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R RS *

Spectrum opportunity cost calculations in parts of VHF Band I

Test Report: 5R Champlain Street Dieppe, New Brunswick Canada E1A 1P6. Model Number: Verification

Technical Requirements for Fixed Radio Systems Operating in the Bands GHz and GHz

LTE Band 7. Channel

Test Report: 4R Champlain Street Dieppe, New-Brunswick Canada E4P 8L6. Model Number: Verification

Ave output power ANT 1(dBm) Ave output power ANT 2 (dbm)

Technical Requirements for Cellular Radiotelephone Systems Operating in the Bands MHz and MHz

DATES OF TESTS: From 03/10/2014 to 20/10/2014 and 25/02/2015. Open area test site in Aunainville (28) - FRANCE. Page 2 out of 54

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION On Behalf of Futaba Corporation Radio Control Model No.:T10CG-2.4G FCC ID:AZPT10CG-24G Brand : Futaba

FCC Part 90 Certification Application. FCC Form 731. For The. Guardian UHF RADIO MODEM FCC ID: NP

Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Report FCC test results of an automatic dog brush, model EUT: Type 1 AC/DC adaptor: SYS W2E

FCC Part 22H&90S Test Report

Information on the Evaluation of VHF and UHF Terrestrial Cross-Border Frequency Coordination Requests

UNIDEN AMERICA CORPORATION 4700 AMON CARTER BLVD. FORT WORTH TEXAS UNITED STATES

TEST REPORT FROM RADIO FREQUENCY INVESTIGATION LTD.

UNIVERSAL UPPER AIR SOUNDING SYSTEM

Technical characteristics and protection criteria for aeronautical mobile service systems in the frequency range GHz

Version TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION. HCTR1208FR49 August 29, 2012 First Approval Report

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.80-3 * Transmitting antennas in HF broadcasting

Emerging EMC Threats. Radio Society. Advancing amateur radio since Dr David Lauder G0SNO Dr John Rogers, M0JAV

Space Frequency Coordination Group

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS -I

Cell Extender Antenna System Design Guide Lines

SHURE ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY LABORATORY TEST REPORT

6 Radio and RF. 6.1 Introduction. Wavelength (m) Frequency (Hz) Unit 6: RF and Antennas 1. Radio waves. X-rays. Microwaves. Light

SIGFOX END- PRODUCT RADIATED TEST PLAN FOR SIGFOX READY TM CERTIFICATION

Hans van der Marel Radio Observatory Division, ASTRON, Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD Dwingeloo, The Netherlands

Compliance Engineering Ireland Ltd

FCC & RSS-216 (Class II Permissive Change) Wireless Power Transfer Report. for A Acer Incorporated

Verification Test Report

FCC PART & IC RSS GHz FHSS TEST REPORT

MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE AND TEST EQUIPMENT USED

ECC Recommendation (16)04

Decisions on the Frequency Bands GHz, GHz and GHz

Version TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION. HCTR1208FR50 August 29, 2012 First Approval Report

A Test Lab Techno Corp. Report Number:1410FR27

Report for Excelsys EMC Measurements for 4Xgen Purchase Order: Project Number EMT07J026 Rev. B

TEST REPORT. Table of Contents

REPORT REVISION HISTORY...

Antenna Performance. Antenna Performance... 3 Gain... 4 Radio Power and the FCC... 6 Link Margin Calculations... 7 The Banner Way... 8 Glossary...

Mobile Communication Services on Aircraft Publication date: May /34/EC Notification number: 2014/67/UK

Revision history. Revision Date of issue Test report No. Description KES-RF-14T0042 Initial

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

Page 1 of 20 No.: HM TEST REPORT FCC PART 15 SUBPART C CERTIFICATION REPORT FOR LOW POWER TRANSMITTER. TEST REPORT No.

Enclosed you will find your file copy of a Part 15 Certification (FCC ID: LBBGH3025TE).

XBee Series 2 OEM RF Module Model No.: XBEE2 FCC ID: OUR-XBEE2. Applicant: MaxStream, Inc. 355 South 520 West Suite 180 Lindon, UT 84042

FCC Test Report. Report No.: PTCDQ FC01

Measurement of Digital Transmission Systems Operating under Section March 23, 2005

Annex 5. Determination of the interference field strength in the Land Mobile Service

OfW48 UK Frequency Allocations for Fixed (Point-to-Point) Wireless Services and Scanning Telemetry

RF Test Report. Report No.: AGC EE13 : VR 6600PRO, VR 6610, VR 6700, VRP 6000, VRP 6800 : VERO GLOBAL COMMUNICATION CO.

RadioShack Corporation. Application For Certification. 2.4GHz Digital Wireless Headphone (FCC ID: AAO R)

5. Maximum Conducted Output Power

APPENDIX 4 (REV.WRC-15) Consolidated list and tables of characteristics for use in the application of the procedures of Chapter III

FCC PART 90 AND IC RSS-119, RSS-GEN TEST REPORT

Page 1 of 19 No.: HM TEST REPORT FCC PART 15 SUBPART C CERTIFICATION REPORT FOR LOW POWER TRANSMITTER. TEST REPORT No.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

FCC ID: A3LSLS-BD106Q. Report No.: HCT-RF-1801-FC003. Plot Data for Output Port 2_QPSK 9 khz ~ 150 khz Middle channel 150 khz ~ 30 MHz Low channel

RF Test Report. Report No.: AGC EE13. CLIENT : Zhengzhou Eshow Import and Export Trade Co.,Ltd.

Update of the compatibility study between RLAN 5 GHz and EESS (active) in the band MHz

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

TEST REPORT FOR GSM TESTING

August, Antennas 101: A Course in RF Basics

FCC RF Test Report. : FCC 47 CFR Part 2, and 90(S) : PCS Licensed Transmitter (PCB)

A METHOD OF CERTIFICATION FOR LTE SMALL CELLS IN THE HFC NETWORK

Windsond Product Catalogue

TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION

Trees, vegetation, buildings etc.

Installation instructions

EXHIBIT 10 TEST REPORT. FCC Parts 2 & 24

Programme Making and Special Events High power PMSE applications in the lower two megahertz of Channel 38 ( MHz)

FCC TEST REPORT. ADDRESS: #2 Creation Rd. 4, Science-Based Ind. Park Hsinchu Taiwan, R.O.C.

TEST REPORT. For ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY (DONG GUAN) COMPANY LIMITED EN V9.0.2 ( )

FCC RF Test Report. : FCC 47 CFR Part 2, and 90(S) : PCS Licensed Transmitter Held to Ear (PCE)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 210/7)

RF Test Report. Report No.: AGC EE10. TEST NAME : 1999/5/EC R&TTE Directive Art.3.2 STANDARD(S) : EN V : V1.

Amateur Radio License. Propagation and Antennas

Test Report. Prepared for: Becker Avionics, Inc. Model: TG Description: Aeronautical basestation radio used for emergencies

FCC Radio Test Report. Orpak Systems Ltd.

To «Test_Standards» Test of: Radwin Ltd. Outdoor Subscriber Radio Unit. To: FCC CFR 47 Part 15B; ICES-003 Issue 6: 2016

Jul. 16, Jun. 04, Shenzhen. Tel:(86-755)

FCC REPORT. 570 E1 Camino Real #200, Redwood City, CA 94063, United Manufacturer:

Transcription:

Radiosonde Datalink Study Richard Smout, John Nash, Roger Carter Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 3PB Tel. 1392 885641, Fax. 1392 885681, richard.smout@metoffice.gov.uk Abstract Working Party 7C at the International Telecommunications Union is responsible for the protection of the MetAids (Meteorological Aids) band. This name is given to those devices used for meteorological purposes; typically radiosondes that operate within the bands 4.15 46 MHz and 1668.4 17 MHz. The current study leading up to the World Radio Conference in 27 requires that the interference criteria for radiosondes be revised. This report summarises the measurements made at Camborne, Cornwall, in South West England during April 26. The Met Office started flying the Vaisala RS92 SGP GPS radiosonde in April 25 following an exhaustive acceptance test which began in May and concluded in October 24. A further evaluation of this radiosonde was performed in the WMO sponsored trial held in Mauritius in February 25. This poster summarises the results of the measurements taken at Camborne. Radiosonde Datalink Study Modern radiosondes such as the Graw (DFM97 GPS), Modem (GL98) and Vaisala (RS92 SGP GPS) all use crystal controlled transmitters and require at most 48kHz band width. By changing to these new radiosondes Meteorological Services are able to demonstrate their commitment to using less of radiofrequency spectrum. The narrow band transmitter with digital modulation is less prone to interference from external sources of interference than the earlier analogue transmitters. As such radiosondes can be flown closer together in terms of frequency separation and it is hoped that a national agreement can be reached whereby part of the 43 MHz Metaids band could be relinquished for other use in the UK. However, decisions as to spectrum used in the UK for future Metaids operations need to be coordinated with the radiosonde use in neighbouring countries, since radiosondes often cross national borders during flight. The information regarding radiosondes and their transmission characteristics is limited. Study group 7C was commissioned to revise the details regarding data links and interference under recommendation ITU-R SA 1263. The data link study performed at Camborne was necessary to provide additional information as part of this work. In this test it was not possible to inject an interference signal at the antenna end. The data recorded is under typical conditions experienced at Camborne in Cornwall South West England. Antenna positioning is important. The RB21 antenna used during the trial has a similar unobstructed clear view of the horizon as the antenna used for operational measurements.. Ofcom were asked to provide assistance with this study as they have the necessary expertise and equipment to make the measurements. Test setup The signal output from the Vaisala UHF antenna (RB21) was split at the RGB21 grounding adaptor feeding a signal to an Agilent E444A 3Hz 26.5GHz PSA Series Spectrum Analyser. The loss across the splitter was quantified using a Rohde and Schwarz portable spectrum analyser model number FSH6 1KHz to 6GHz. See figures 1 and 5 for schematics of the test configuration.

Figure 1, schematic of the antenna splitter. X1 X2 1nF 1 R X3 The drop across X1 X2 was 2.1 dbs and X1 X3 was 1.8 dbs. The gain of the corner reflector is quoted in the Vaisala manual as 12dBs and the pre amp gain 2 dbs. The antenna RB21 was connected to X1, SPS22 (MW21) to X2 and the spectrum analyser to X3. Attenuators were not used in the setup due to the highly sensitive input of the Agilent spectrum analyser. The signal strength data rate output from the Agilent Spectrum Analyser was set at 1 minute intervals. The data output from the Vaisala system was the full 1 second resolution so this was imported in to RSKOMP (radiosonde data comparison software written by Sergey Kurnosenko), the data rate was then reduced to minute values and exported to Microsoft Excel where it was combined with the signal strength values from the Agilent. In total 16 flights were flown, with a maximum range of 225 kms reached on the last flight. Figure 2 summarises all of the flights, flight 2 (yellow trace) had the lowest signal strength when compared against the other flights. Over all there was consistent repeatability between flights with the most variation at the start of the ascent, which can be seen in the standard deviations in Figure 4. Figure 3 shows the average for all the flights. As an attenuator was not used the signal strength readings are higher than what would normally be expected. Prior to launch the Vaisala RS92 SGP GPS radiosonde transmits at reduced power to conserve the battery. Following launch after a pressure decrease of 5hPa the radiosonde switches to higher power of approximately 1 mwatts. The switch from low to higher power can be seen in figure 3 between.5 and 1 km. Only 1 flight suffered large loss of wind information, 14%, possibly caused by the radiosonde failing to deploy correctly under the balloon because the suspension cord did not unwind correctly. The other flights suffered less than 1 percent data loss. UK radiosonde stations have two frequencies allocated, primary and spare. A test was conducted placing a working high power RS92 SGP GPS radiosonde on the wind vane and anemometer tower at Camborne. A low power RS92 AGP GPS radiosonde was flown as normal just 2 KHz away in frequency. No interference or signal loss was observed.

Signal Strength 6 5 4 3 2 1 4 15 3 47 65 8 92 13 113 124 138 155 174 193 24 216 Field strength (db µv/m) -1 Range (km) Fig. 2, signal strength (db µvolts per meter); against range (km). Signal Strength 5 45 4 Field strength (db µv/m) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 3 8 17 31 42 51 59 66 72 78 85 97 15 11 129 136 187 197 26 216 Range (km) Fig. 3, Average signal strength (db µvolts per meter); against range (km).

Signal Strength 14 12 Standard deviation (db µv/m) 1 8 6 4 2 3 6 13 24 35 45 52 59 65 71 76 81 89 98 18 11 116 133 141 Range (km) Fig. 4, Signal strength standard deviation (db µvolts per meter); against range (km). Figure 5, Diagram of measurement setup, note that the optional attenuator was not used. Reduced spectrum feasibility study. The Met Office is performing a feasibility study to investigate the effects of reducing the amount of spectrum used for operational radiosonde ascents. Initially Aberporth, Camborne and Larkhill stations in Wales and southern England will be flying radiosondes in the range of 44.2 to 44.6 MHz.

Conclusions Apart from the second flight which showed a low signal to noise ratio all other flights showed characteristics that were as expected. The stable transmitters in the radiosondes and high quality receivers within the ground stations allow data to be retrieved when the signal to noise level is low. Digital modulation and narrow band transmitters allows the separation in terms of frequency between stations to be reduced. Figure 4 illustrates good repeatability between the radiosondes flown over the test period. Recommendations for further work The Met Office has the capability to fly radiosondes from three other manufacturers, Graw, Modem and Sippican Lockheed Martin. It would be useful to characterise these radiosondes as well. The maximum range over which the radiosondes can fly was not fully realised during the week of the test. It may be necessary to repeat the exercise but instead hire a spectrum analyser for the winter period, rather than allocate a week to perform the test! Study group 7 have asked to know the receiver noise floor relative to the signal levels you measured; and from that, the minimum signalto-noise ratio required for reliable data reception. Work is ongoing!

Appendix A Field Strength Calculation Antenna quoted as 12 db (related to dipole) i.e. 12 dbd Antenna related to isotropic radiator = 12 + 2.15 = 14.15 dbi Antenna Factor (calculated from antenna gain related to an isotropic radiator) Ant Factor = 2 log1 FREQUENCY (MHz) Antenna Gain in dbi 29.8 (constant) = 2 log 42 14.15 29.8 AF = 8 Correction Factor = AF LNA Gain + Cable Loss + Splitter / dc Block and lead loss = 8 2 + 5 + 1.8 db = -5.2 db Field Strength = Signal (dbµv) -5.2 dbµv/m The calculation has a negative value because an attenuator was not available for the test. The engineers from Ofcom were confident that this would not jeopardise the trial given the sensitivity of the Agilent E444A Spectrum Analyser. Through out the test radiosondes were flown tuned to either 41.5 MHz or 42.7 MHz. Acknowledgements The test was performed with collaboration of James Loughlin and David Thorpe from Ofcom their assistance is much appreciated. David Franc, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. Ilkka Ikonen, Vaisala Oyj.