The CMS Muon Detector

Similar documents
The CMS Muon Trigger

Operation and performance of the CMS Resistive Plate Chambers during LHC run II

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 25 Oct 2012

8.882 LHC Physics. Detectors: Muons. [Lecture 11, March 11, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

The CMS Outer HCAL SiPM Upgrade.

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. CMS detector performance.

The trigger system of the muon spectrometer of the ALICE experiment at the LHC

Construction and Performance of the stgc and MicroMegas chambers for ATLAS NSW Upgrade

optimal hermeticity to reduce backgrounds in missing energy channels, especially to veto two-photon induced events.

Tracking and Alignment in the CMS detector

Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in Run I and Upgrades for Run II

1 Detector simulation

The Status of ATLAS. Xin Wu, University of Geneva On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. X. Wu, HCP2009, Evian, 17/11/09 ATL-GEN-SLIDE

A Cosmic Muon Tracking Algorithm for the CMS RPC based Technical Trigger

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Track Triggers for ATLAS

Construction and Performance of the stgc and Micromegas chambers for ATLAS NSW Upgrade

The 1st Result of Global Commissioning of the ATALS Endcap Muon Trigger System in ATLAS Cavern

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 20 Oct 2008

Status of the LHCb Experiment

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

ATLAS Muon Trigger and Readout Considerations. Yasuyuki Horii Nagoya University on Behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

Muon Collider background rejection in ILCroot Si VXD and Tracker detectors

GEM beam test for the BESIII experiment

Aging studies for the CMS RPC system

Trigger Overview. Wesley Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager. DOE/NSF Review April 12, 2000

Design and Construction of Large Size Micromegas Chambers for the ATLAS Phase-1 upgrade of the Muon Spectrometer

The LHCb trigger system

Recent Developments in Gaseous Tracking Detectors

Installation, Commissioning and Performance of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) Electronics

Status of ATLAS & CMS Experiments

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment at the LHC. Images of Assembly and Installation

CMS RPC HL-LHC upgrade with fast timing detectors

The CLEO-III Drift Chamber Vienna Conference on Instrumentation, 19-February-2001 Daniel Peterson, Cornell University

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

The ATLAS Muon System

Status of the Continuous Ion Back Flow Module for TPC Detector

BaBar and PEP II. Physics

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)476. The CMS Tracker upgrade for HL-LHC. Sudha Ahuja on behalf of the CMS Collaboration

Micromegas calorimetry R&D

Lecture 11. Complex Detector Systems

Upgrade of the ATLAS Thin Gap Chamber Electronics for HL-LHC. Yasuyuki Horii, Nagoya University, on Behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Performance of 8-stage Multianode Photomultipliers

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 13 Oct 2015

L1 Trigger Activities at UF. The CMS Level-1 1 Trigger

Hardware Trigger Processor for the MDT System

CMS SLHC Tracker Upgrade: Selected Thoughts, Challenges and Strategies

Muons & Particle ID. Muon/PID Studies

DHCAL Prototype Construction José Repond Argonne National Laboratory

Development of Large Area and of Position Sensitive Timing RPCs

Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4 Q1-2 Q3-4. Final design and pre-production.

Triple GEM detector as beam monitor Monitors for Crystal experiment at SPS A compact Time Projection chamber with GEM

The LHCb Upgrade BEACH Simon Akar on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

Spectrometer cavern background

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Performance studies of large-area triple-gem prototypes for future upgrades of the CMS forward muon system

irpc upgrade project for CMS during HL-LHC program

What do the experiments want?

Attilio Andreazza INFN and Università di Milano for the ATLAS Collaboration The ATLAS Pixel Detector Efficiency Resolution Detector properties

5. RESISTIVE PLATE CHAMBERS

Muon reconstruction in ATLAS

3.1 Introduction, design of HERA B

Trigger and Data Acquisition at the Large Hadron Collider

Trigger Rate Dependence and Gas Mixture of MRPC for the LEPS2 Experiment at SPring-8

Tests of the CMS Level-1 Regional Calorimeter Trigger Prototypes

James W. Rohlf. Super-LHC: The Experimental Program. Boston University. Int. Workshop on Future Hadron Colliders Fermilab, 17 October 2003

Hardware Trigger Processor for the MDT System

THE LHC is expected to be upgraded to the HL-LHC

Overall Design Considerations for a Detector System at HIEPA

Current Status of ATLAS Endcap Muon Trigger System

Commissioning Status and Results of ATLAS Level1 Endcap Muon Trigger System. Yasuyuki Okumura. Nagoya TWEPP 2008

First-level trigger systems at LHC. Nick Ellis EP Division, CERN, Geneva

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating Pad Detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring

First Results with the Prototype Detectors of the Si/W ECAL

CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Preliminary Plan and Cost Estimate

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

CMS Tracker Upgrades. R&D Plans, Present Status and Perspectives. Benedikt Vormwald Hamburg University on behalf of the CMS collaboration

KLM detector for SuperB

ATLAS ITk and new pixel sensors technologies

Measurement of the charged particle density with the ATLAS detector: First data at vs = 0.9, 2.36 and 7 TeV Kayl, M.S.

Pixel sensors with different pitch layouts for ATLAS Phase-II upgrade

Development of large readout area, high time resolution RPCs for LEPS2 at SPring-8

Silicon Sensor and Detector Developments for the CMS Tracker Upgrade

`First ep events in the Zeus micro vertex detector in 2002`

CMS Silicon Strip Tracker: Operation and Performance

OPERA RPC: installation and underground test results

A Large Low-mass GEM Detector with Zigzag Readout for Forward Tracking at EIC

First-level trigger systems at LHC

L1 Track Finding For a TiME Multiplexed Trigger

Operation and Performance of the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter and Level-1 Topological Triggers in Run 2 at the LHC

The ATLAS detector at the LHC

Development of a Highly Selective First-Level Muon Trigger for ATLAS at HL-LHC Exploiting Precision Muon Drift-Tube Data

Status of the CSC Track-Finder

Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications

DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE SIZE MICROMEGAS DETECTORS

CMS electron and _ photon performance at s = 13 TeV. Francesco Micheli on behalf of CMS Collaboration

Plans for RPC DHCAL Prototype. David Underwood Argonne National Laboratory

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 12 Nov 2010

Transcription:

VCI 21 conference 19-23/2/21 The CMS Muon Detector Paolo Giacomelli INFN Sezione di Bologna Univ. of California, Riverside General Overview Drift Tubes Cathode Strip Chambers Resistive Plate Chambers Global Muon Trigger Conclusions

The CMS Muon Detector FORWARD CALORIMETER CMS A Compact Solenoidal Detector for LHC MUON CHAMBERS TRACKER CRYSTAL ECAL HCAL Z Y X AIR PADS Total weight : 12,5 t. Overall diameter : 15. m Overall length : 21.6 m Magnetic field : 4 Tesla SUPERCONDUCTING COIL RETURN YOKE CMS-PARA-1-24/11/97 JLB.PP / pg.gm.hr The CMS Muon detector is made of 3 different sub-detectors to ensure redundancy and robustness: Drift Tubes (DT) in the barrel region Cathod Strip Chambers (CSC) in the endcap region and Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) as dedicated trigger detectors in both the barrel and the endcap 2

The CMS Muon Detector µ Trasverse view 5 wheels in the Barrel MB/Z/4/6 YB/Z/3/6 MB/Z/3/6 YB/Z/2/6 MB/Z/2/6 YB/Z/1/6 MB/Z/4/5 YB/Z/3/5 MB/Z/3/5 YB/Z/2/5 MB/Z/2/5 YB/Z/1/5 TC MB/Z/1/6 MB/Z/1/5 TC MB/Z/4/4 YB/Z/3/4 MB/Z/3/4 YB/Z/2/4 MB/Z/2/4 YB/Z/1/4 MB/Z/1/4 TC COIL HB EB YB/Z/2/3 MB/Z/2/3 YB/Z/1/3 MB/Z/1/3 TC YB/Z/3/3 MB/Z/3/3 MB/Z/4/3 YB/Z/2/2 MB/Z/2/2 YB/Z/1/2 MB/Z/1/2 TC MB/Z/3/2 YB/Z/3/2 MB/Z/4/2 3 (φ) sectors MB/Z/4/7 YB/Z/3/7 MB/Z/3/7 YB/Z/2/7 MB/Z/2/7 YB/Z/1/7 MB/Z/1/7 TC MB/Z/4/1 YB/Z/3/1 MB/Z/3/1 YB/Z/2/1 MB/Z/2/1 YB/Z/1/1 MB/Z/1/1 TC MB/Z/4/8 YB/Z/3/8 MB/Z/3/8 YB/Z/2/8 MB/Z/2/8 YRB/Z/1/8 MB/Z/1/8 TC MB/Z/4/9 YB/Z/3/9 MB/Z/3/9 YB/Z/2/9 MB/Z/2/9 YB/Z/1/9 TC MB/Z/1/9 TC MB/Z/1/1 YB/Z/3/1 MB/Z/3/1 YB/Z/2/1 MB/Z/2/1 YB/Z/1/1 MB/Z/2/11 YB/Z/1/11 MB/Z/1/11 TC YB/Z/2/11 MB/Z/3/11 YB/Z/3/11 MB/Z/4/11 MB/Z/1/12 TC MB/Z/2/12 YB/Z/1/12 YB/Z/2/12 MB/Z/3/12 YB/Z/3/12 MB/Z/4/12 Z+ Y ϕ X Towards Center of LHC MB/Z/4/1 Z = -2, -1,, 1, 2 according to the Barrel wheel concerned 4 layers of Muon chambers covering up to η =2.4, providing 3 track segments along a muon track 3

/pg/hr Muon Detector Requirements Z 1.23 % g Y C.M.S. Compact Muon Solenoid Longitudinal View 7.43 m 6.955 m h = 1.479 ME/4/2 h = 1.1 ME/3/2 ME/2/2 ME/1/3 movement with field on:.5 cm, distributed 6.61 m 3.954 m h =1 h =.5 YB/2/3 YB/2/2 MB/2/4 MB/2/3 MB/2/2 YB/2/1 Field off YB/1/3 YB/1/2 MB/1/4 MB/1/3 MB/1/2 YB/1/1 1.268 m MB//4 YB//3 MB//3 YB//2 MB//2 YB//1 4.95 m h = 5.31 HF/1 1.86 m ME/4/1 YE/3 1.83 m 1.63 m ME/3/1 9.75 m YE/2 8.495 m ME/2/1 7.24 m 6.66 m 6.45 m 5.68 m 4.2 m 2.95 m 1.811 m 1.29 m.44 m. m 14.96 m 14.56 m 14.53 m 1.91 m ME/1/2 YE/1 ME/1/1 HE/1 1.711 m EE/1 SB/1 SE/1 4.332 m 3.9 m. m 7.38 m 7. m 5.975 m h = 3. h = 2.4 MB/2/1 2.7 m MB/1/1 MB//1 CB/ HB/1 1.9415 m EB/1 3.8 m 2.864 m 1.185 m 2.935 m. m Field off movement with field on: 1 cm All dimensions are indicated with field off CMS - PARA- 3-14/1/97 PP Muon ID with at least 16 λ down to η =2.4 Standalone transverse momentum res. 8-15% δp t /p t (at 1 GeV), 2-4% δp t /p t (at 1 TeV) Global momentum resolution 1.-1.5 % δp t /p t Unambiguous BX identification Single and di-muon first level trigger with variable p t thresholds down to η =2.1 Correct charge assignment up to p=7 TeV Ability to withstand the highest radiation and interaction background foreseen at the LHC 4

Drift Tubes layout MB1,2,3 = 8 φ-layers + 4 θ-layers MB4 = 8 φ-layers 25 chambers 2 channels Cell Layers RPC RPC wire pitch = 4.2 cm max. drift time = 38 ns SuperLayer DT chamber RPC RPC 5

DT basic cell design New design: 18 V - 12 V Nominal voltages Gas mixture Ar(85%) + CO 2 (15%) 36 V Requirements Single cell space resolution 25 µm Chamber space resolution ~ 1 µm BX tagging efficiency 99%, trigger space res. 1-2 mm 6

DT time resolution Drift Time Simulation test beam 2 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 HV: 36/18/-12 V Time Spectrum from TDC 1 2 3 4 5 6 ns 2 175 15 125 1 75 5 25 225 2 175 15 125 1 75 5 25 Meantimer run 842 87.9 / 21 Constant 1899. Mean 368.1 Sigma 4.585 Preliminary: MT1 83.43 / 2 Constant 1997. Mean 368.7 Sigma 4.362 vdrift = 57mm/ns Resol.= 28 mm (all cells together) 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4 MT2 ns 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4 ns 7

DT test beam results Q4: Single wire resolution (test beam 1999) 8

B perp = B cos (φ) B par = B sin (φ) DT magnetic field effects v drift apparent efficiency resolution Drift velocity (mm/ns) 58 57 56 55 Phi = deg. Phi = 1 deg. Phi = 15 deg. Cell efficiency (%) 1 99.5 99 98.5 98 Resolution (mm) 6 5 4 Phi = deg. Phi = 1 deg. Phi = 15 deg. 54 97.5 3 53 52 51 97 96.5 96 95.5 Phi = deg. Phi = 1 deg. Phi = 15 deg. 2 1 5.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 Magnetic field (T) 95.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 Magnetic field (T).2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 Magnetic field (T) 9

DT Local Trigger BTI h 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 x 9 A B C D x 32 BTI BTI TRACO TRACO TRACO TRACO sel 9 5 TSS previews 2 9+2 Server Board TSMS full tracks 25 TSMD sel 3 bit TRACO Out Out 1 Out 2 Out 3 Out 4 Out 5 Out 6 Out 7 Out 8 Out 9 Out 1 Out 11 Outer Layer Phi Trigger Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 previews 16 TSMD 25 full tracks 2 bit To Sector Collector D = 23.7 cm Xcor Kcor In In 1 In 2 In3 Inner Layer x 32 BTI 2 TST BTI Theta Trigger Board 1 2 Outer SL θ TRIGGER SERVER Inner SL 1

track clas selector Assignment Unit Barrel track finder Pairwise Matching - Extrapolation muon station 4 Track Assembler Assignment Unit extrapolation window track segment muon station 3 muon station 2 muon station 1 track found (TS1, TS2, TS3, TS4) pt f h quality f2 -f1 extrapolation result "1/" TS1, TS2, TS3, TS4 11

CSC layout 54 Chambers 4, readout channels Sensitive area 6, m 2 (all planes) Offline spatial resolution ~1 mm Trigger spatial precision ~1-2 mm Trigger bunch-tagging efficiency ~99% 12

Endcap Muon System Large 1 o (3.4x1.5 m 2 ): 72 ME2/2 chambers 72 ME3/2 chambers (72 ME4/2 chambers) Small 1 o (1.8x1.1 m 2 ): 72 ME1/1 chambers 72 ME1/2 chambers 72 ME1/3 chambers h = 3. h = 2.61 h = 2.85 h = 2.436 h = 1.218 h = 1.35 h = 1.392 h = 1.479 h = 1.566 h = 1.653 h = 1.74 h = 1.827 h = 1.914 h = 2.1 h = 2.88 h = 2.262 CMS DETECTOR ME / 1/3 6.66 m h = 1.131 h = 1.44 h =.957 h =.87 h =.783 h =.696 h =.69 h =.522 h =.435 h =.348 h =.261 h =.174 h =.87 h =. ME / 4/2 ME / 4/1 YE / 3 ME / 3/2 ME / 3/1 YE / 2 ME / 2/2 ME / 2/1 YE / 1 ME / 1/2 NOSE ME / 1/1 4.4 m MB / 2/4 MB / 1/4 YB / 2/3 MB / 2/3 YB / 2/2 MB / 2/2 YB / 2/1 MB / 2/1 HE / 1 YB / 1/3 MB / 1/3 YB / 1/2 MB / 1/2 YB / 1/1 MB / 1/1 Coil 1.268 m HB / 1 EB / 1 MB / /4 YB / /3 MB / /3 YB / /2 MB / /2 YB / /1 MB / /1 7.38 m 7.1 m 5.975 m 4.885 m 4.2 m 3.8 m 2.95 m 2.864 m 1.93 m 1.41 m 1.31 m Small 2 o (1.9x1.5 m 2 h =5.31 ): 36 ME2/1 chambers 36 ME3/1 chambers (36 ME4/1 chambers) 14.98 m 14.58 m 14.55 m.5 1. (meters) HF / 1 1.88 m 1.6 m 9.77 m 8.515 m 8.26 m 6.7 m 6.5 m 5.7 m 3.88 m EE / 1 3.22 m 3. m Tracker D_D_141c CMS-RRB 15 April 97 4 Environment random hit rates up to 1 Hz/cm 2 2 khz/channel 4 times larger than mip signals punch-through rates up to 1 Hz/cm 2 penetrate through all six planes of a chamber B-field 3.5 T and uniform in ME1/1-1 T and very non-uniform in some others 13

CSC conceptual design CSCs will satisfy the performance requirements, while operating in the CMS/LHC environment muon cathode wires cathode induced charge avalanche cathode with strips wires plane cathode Conceptual design of a CMS EMU CSC Wires trapezoidal chambers length up to 3.4 m width up to 1.5 m 6 planes per chamber 9.5 mm gas gap (per plane) Strips 6.7 to 16. mm strip width strips run radially to measure f-coordinate with ~1 mm precision 5 µm wires spaced by 3.2 mm 5 to 16 wires ganged in groups wires measure r-coordinate gas Ar(4%)+CO 2 (5%)+CF 4 (1%) HV~3.6 kv (Q cathode ~11 fc, Q anode ~14 fc) 14

BX Tagging Efficiency (4th time in LCT) CSC time and space resolution Bunch tagging ID efficiency ~99% at maximum LHC rates Spatial resolution <1 mm even for very wide strips: - strip width = 16 mm - o strip width = 12 mm Rates expected at LHC 92% efficiency requirement 4 3 2 1 - D strip width = 8 mm six plane chamber resolution (MC).2.4.6.8 1 Hit coordinate across strip (x/w) single-plane resolution Rate, Hz/(wire group) 15

CSC Anode Trigger 25 ns Time spread per plane is broad: drift, noise, fluctuations in cluster formations "Dr ift" time per plane (ns) A pattern of anode hits, or LCT for Local Charged Track, consistent with a muon track (i.e., pointing back to IP) is searched for (to ensure time overlap, signals are shaped to last 15 ns) 2nd (or 3rd) earliest hit in LCT has a much narrower distribution and can be used for reliable bunch crossing tagging sigma = 3.9 ns 3rd hit in LCT 16

CSC Cathode trigger Q C First, hits are localized with precision of a half-strip: Q > threshold Q >Q right Q >Q left Q right >Q left Q L Q R _ + _ + Threshold _ + _ + Then, a track-like pattern of half-strips is searched for (LCT-- local charged track). Expected precision: (w/2)/sqrt(12)=.14*w for normal incidence for wide-spread angles it should be even better 17

CSC Trigger m m m m m j q 18

R (cm) RPC layout 8 7 6 5 4 3 h 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 Z (cm) 19

RPC double gap design HV HV Bakelite Gas Bakelite Bakelite Gas Bakelite Frontend strips strip pitch = η x φ ~.1 x 5/16 = 2-1 cm x 1-4 cm 2 mm double gap bakelite resistivity: 2-5 x 1 1 Wcm bakelite thickness: 2 mm gas mixture: 95.5% C 2 H 2 F 4 + 4.5% iso-c 4 H 1 operating voltage: ~9 kv 1.5-2.5 m RPC3.8-1.25 m RPC4 Lateral C bar Front-end electronics 2-3 chamb. 256 mm CMS barrel CMS endcap 12 mm indentation Front-end plate Trapezoidal strips and chambers 2

Efficiency (%) RPC efficiency and cluster size 98.5% HV=1.4 kv 95% HV=1.1 kv Cluster size < 2.3 strip 93% HV=1.5 kv Cluster with more than 7 strips<5% Source off Source off, random trigger Source off, muon trigger Abs 1, random trigger Abs1, muon trigger Abs5, random trigger Abs 5, muon trigge 21

RPC time resolution ABS 1 σ < 1.6 ns Events/1 ns 22

RPC Trigger algorithm MS 4 4 L 2T 5 1 6 3 MS 3 MS 2 A T C H E S 8 5... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 MS 1 4T LATCHES p t coding 23

R (cm) 8 7 Muon Trigger geometry DriftTubes h=.8 h=1. h=1.2 RPC 6 5 4 3 2 h=2.1 h=2.4 1 CSC 2 4 6 8 1 12 Z (cm) 4 Stations in the barrel and each endcap 24

Global Muon Trigger (f, df, h, dh) (f, df, h, dh) h f h f h f h f 25

Trigger Rate (Hz) Trigger Rate (Hz) 1 6 1 5 Muon Trigger rates vs. p t Barrel: h < 1.4 Endcap: 1.4 < h < 2.4 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 4 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 Generated DT RPC GMT-opt GMT-and GMT-or 1 2 1 Generated CSC RPC GMT-opt GMT-and GMT-or 1 1 1 1 cut muon p T (GeV/c) 1 1 cut muon p T Curves show individual DT, RPC & CSC & 3 Global Muon Trigger Combinations: OR, AND, & optimized selection based on track quality & p t information Single muon trigger rate is 8.1 khz for a threshold of 25 GeV (9% efficient) Dimuon muon trigger rate is 2.8 khz for thresholds of 8, 5 GeV (9% efficient) (GeV/c) 26

Efficiency (%) Global Muon Trigger Efficiency 1 8 6 4 DTBX CSC DTBX or CSC 2 RPC GMT.5 1 1.5 2 (units) 2.5 h gen 27

CSC Efficiency (%), h >1.4 RPC Efficiency (%), 1.4< h <2.1 GMT Efficiency (%), 1.4< h <2.4 DT Efficiency (%), h <1.4 RPC Efficiency (%), h <1.4 GMT Efficiency (%), h <1.4 Muon trigger rates turn-on curves DTBX brlrpc brlgmt 1 8 6 4 2 1 GeV/c 2 GeV/c 3 GeV/c 4 GeV/c 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c 1 8 6 4 2 1 GeV/c 2 GeV/c 3 GeV/c 4 GeV/c 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c 1 8 6 4 2 1 GeV/c 2 GeV/c 3 GeV/c 4 GeV/c 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c barrel 2 4 6 8 1 (GeV/c) p T,gen 2 4 6 8 1 (GeV/c) 7 p T,gen 2 4 6 8 1 (GeV/c) p T,gen CSC fwdrpc fwdgmt 1 8 6 4 2 1 GeV/c 2 GeV/c 3 GeV/c 4 GeV/c 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c 1 8 6 4 2 1 GeV/c 2 GeV/c 3 GeV/c 4 GeV/c 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c 1 8 6 4 2 1 GeV/c 2 GeV/c 3 GeV/c 4 GeV/c 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c endcap 2 4 6 8 1 (GeV/c) p T,gen 2 4 6 8 1 p T,gen (GeV/c) 2 4 6 8 1 (GeV/c) p T,gen 28

Conclusions The CMS Muon detector will provide good muon identification with 4 independent measurements down to η =2.4 The Muon detector will provide unambiguous BX identification and single and di-muon first level triggers with very high efficiency Test-beam results have proven that the CMS Muon detector will be able to meet the requirements even at the highest LHC luminosities The production of DTs, CSCs and RPCs has started and the detectors will be operational for the first physics runs of LHC, foreseen in the summer of 26 29