LOFAR: From raw visibilities to calibrated data

Similar documents
LOFAR: Special Issues

Data inspection and editing (Flagging, demixing & averaging)

CALIBRATION AND IMAGING WITH LOFAR

MANUAL flagging by the data reducing astronomer used to be sufficient for dealing with. The LOFAR RFI pipeline. Chapter 3

Status of LOFAR. Ronald Nijboer (ASTRON) On behalf of the LOFAR team

Overview of Survey KSP meeting Leiden March 2010

LOFAR Status Update Imaging Busy Week 5 Kickoff Meeting 25 January 2010 Michael Wise*

LOFAR update: long baselines and other random topics

Calibration. (in Radio Astronomy) Ishwara Chandra CH NCRA-TIFR. Acknowledgments:

Applying full polarization A-Projection to very-wide fields of view instruments: An imager for LOFAR Cyril Tasse

The discrete charms of Redundant Spacing Calibration (RSC) J.E.Noordam. Madroon Community Consultants (MCC)

THE LOW-FREQUENCY ARRAY (LOFAR) is a new antenna array that observes the sky. The LOFAR radio environment. Chapter 5

How to SPAM the 150 MHz sky

Recent progress in EVLA-specific algorithms. EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, S. Bhatnagar and U. Rau

When, why and how to self-cal Nathan Brunetti, Crystal Brogan, Amanda Kepley

Pulsar polarimetry. with. Charlotte Sobey. Dr. Aris Noutsos & Prof. Michael Kramer

LOFAR DATA SCHOOL 2016

Wide-Band Imaging. Outline : CASS Radio Astronomy School Sept 2012 Narrabri, NSW, Australia. - What is wideband imaging?

Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

Wide-field, wide-band and multi-scale imaging - II

Observing Modes and Real Time Processing

Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

PdBI data calibration. Vincent Pie tu IRAM Grenoble

Wide Bandwidth Imaging

Radio Frequency Monitoring for Radio Astronomy

Error Recognition Emil Lenc (and Arin)

Sideband Smear: Sideband Separation with the ALMA 2SB and DSB Total Power Receivers

LOFAR: Lessons Learnt

Detrimental Interference Levels at Individual LWA Sites LWA Engineering Memo RFS0012

Understanding and calibrating ionospheric effects. Dr Natasha Hurley-Walker Curtin University / ICRAR

Assessment of RFI measurements for LOFAR

A Crash Course in CASA With a focus on calibration

LOFAR Long Baseline Calibration Commissioning

Plan for Imaging Algorithm Research and Development

Smart Antennas in Radio Astronomy

FOR SEVERAL decades, it has been a challenge to increase the dynamic range of images. Filter techniques. 4.1 Introduction.

A LOFAR RFI detection pipeline and its first results

Planning (VLA) observations

LOFAR Calibration of the Ionosphere and Other Fun Things

VLBI Post-Correlation Analysis and Fringe-Fitting

Workshop Summary: RFI and its impact on the new generation of HI spectral-line surveys

Radio Astronomy: SKA-Era Interferometry and Other Challenges. Dr Jasper Horrell, SKA SA (and Dr Oleg Smirnov, Rhodes and SKA SA)

Imaging and Calibration Algorithms for EVLA, e-merlin and ALMA. Robert Laing ESO

Correcting Radio Astronomy Observations for Ionospheric Faraday Rotation

Radio Data Archives. how to find, retrieve, and image radio data: a lay-person s primer. Michael P Rupen (NRAO)

Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry. Robert Laing (ESO)

Processing Real-Time LOFAR Telescope Data on a Blue Gene/P

Effelsberg Status. James M Anderson On behalf of MPIfR and the LOFAR collaboration

EVLA Memo 146 RFI Mitigation in AIPS. The New Task UVRFI

REDUCTION OF ALMA DATA USING CASA SOFTWARE

Data processing with the RTS A GPU-accelerated calibration & imaging stream processor

Propagation effects (tropospheric and ionospheric phase calibration)

Recent imaging results with wide-band EVLA data, and lessons learnt so far

Numerical Approach for the Analysis and Optimization of Phased Array Feed Systems

Fourier Transforms in Radio Astronomy

LOFAR Data Products. First LOFAR Data Processing School 10 February Michael Wise

More Radio Astronomy

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for wide-field radio astronomy

THEORY OF MEASUREMENTS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 1 Oct 2012

EVLA and LWA Imaging Challenges

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 7 Dec 2010

Wide-band Wide-field Imaging

RFI Monitoring and Analysis at Decameter Wavelengths. RFI Monitoring and Analysis

November SKA Low Frequency Aperture Array. Andrew Faulkner

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

Introduction to Imaging in CASA

CASA Tutorial. Bradley S. Frank. University of Cape Town SKA South Africa

Pulsar Observation with the Effelsberg LOFAR station (Stand alone mode)

EVLA Memo #119 Wide-Band Sensitivity and Frequency Coverage of the EVLA and VLA L-Band Receivers

Phase and Amplitude Calibration in CASA for ALMA data

Calibration in practice. Vincent Piétu (IRAM)

High resolution/high frequency radio interferometry

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for multi-beam radio astronomy

The LOFAR Telescope: System Architecture and Signal Processing

The LOFAR Known Pulsar Data Pipeline Alexov, A.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Mol, J.D.; Stappers, B.W.; van Leeuwen, A.G.J.

ARRAY DESIGN AND SIMULATIONS

Imaging Simulations with CARMA-23

HIGH GAIN ADVANCED GPS RECEIVER

Constant Offset in Cross-Polarized HERA IDR2.1 Data

EVLA Memo #166 Comparison of the Performance of the 3-bit and 8-bit Samplers at C (4 8 GHz), X (8 12 GHz) and Ku (12 18 GHz) Bands

Next Generation Very Large Array Memo No. 16 More on Synthesized Beams and Sensitivity. C.L. Carilli, NRAO, PO Box O, Socorro, NM

Components of Imaging at Low Frequencies: Status & Challenges

March Phased Array Technology. Andrew Faulkner

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 19 Nov 2018

Introduction to Radio Interferometry Sabrina Stierwalt Alison Peck, Jim Braatz, Ashley Bemis

Phased Array Feeds & Primary Beams

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO VLA PROJECT VLA TEST MEMO 114

Calibration with CASA

Calibratability and its impact on configuration design for the LOFAR and SKA phased array radio telescopes

Data Processing: Visibility Calibration

Error Recognition and Data Analysis

Towards SKA Multi-beam concepts and technology

SKA1 low Baseline Design: Lowest Frequency Aspects & EoR Science

ALMA Phase Calibration, Phase Correction and the Water Vapour Radiometers

TEST RESULTS OF A HIGH GAIN ADVANCED GPS RECEIVER

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

James M Anderson. in collaboration with Jan Noordam and Oleg Smirnov. MPIfR, Bonn, 2006 Dec 07

Technical Considerations: Nuts and Bolts Project Planning and Technical Justification

Transcription:

Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy LOFAR: From raw visibilities to calibrated data John McKean (ASTRON) [subbing in for Manu] ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) 1

Overview AIM: Give a basic 30 min summary of the reduction processes used to calibrate LOFAR data. The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 2

Overview The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 3

LOFAR Imaging Cookbook Full details of the calibration process can be found in the LOFAR imaging cookbook. Please send any updates or suggestions to Roberto Pizzo. http://www.astron.nl/~mckean/lofar_cookbook.pdf 4

Overview The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 5

Standard imaging pipeline 6

Overview The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 7

Data volumes Like many new instruments, LOFAR will also investigate data handling management. Interferometric Data Data Vol = Ba * P * T * C * S * Be * (bytes/t + overhead) Ba = baselines = 2556 (for HBA Dual) or 1128 (for HBA Single). P = Polarisations = 4 (XX, YY, XY, YX). T = Time Samples = 21600 (for 6h observations and 1 s visibility averaging). C = Channels = 256 (or 64) S = Sub-bands = 244 Be = 1 bytes/sa + overhead = 8 + 0.2 Data Vol = 113 TBs 8

Data inspection General details 9

Inspection in CASA First have to correct for the Antenna-Mount type 10

Overview The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 11

Default Pre-Processing Pipeline (NDPPP) NDPPP can be used to Flagging (automatic or manual) Averaging in time and/or frequency Phase shift to another phase centre Count flags and write counts into a table Combine (concat) sub-bands into a single measurement set De-mix and subtract the A-team sources Add stations to form a superstation (i.e. superterp) Filter out baselines and/or channels Is run by the Radio Observatory to carry out basic flagging, averaging and subtraction of bright A-team sources. Can be re-run by the user to carryout further tasks. 12

Basic operation and parsets A simple text parameter set (PARSET) file is used to operate NDPPP 13

De-mixing The de-mixing operation removes the contribution of the A-team to the visibilities (v. important for LBA). See van der Tol et al. (2007, IEEE TSP, 55, 4497) for the technical details. Before After 14

Overview The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 15

Radio frequency interference Europe is a highly populated area - lots of radio frequency interference! LOFAR mitigates RFI by i) having a small time and frequency resolution (1s; 763 Hz). ii) having 40 db receiver units to stop saturation/spill over to other channels iii) having digital filters to remove signals at < 30 MHz, 80--110 MHz. 16

AOflagger Standard LOFAR RFI rejection using AOflagger (Offringa et al., 2010, MNRAS, 405, 155). Combination of statistics automatically fits a surface to the time-frequency plane to identify RFI, iteratively defines the threshold. Low level of false-positive RFI detections Struggles with very broad-band RFI. 17

Radio frequency interference (Offringa et al., 2013, A&A, 549, 10) RFI occupancy is low and day / night results are consistent. LBA: 1.8% HBA: 3.2% 18

Diagnostic plots 19

Overview The LOFAR Cookbook Imaging Pipeline The raw data and data editing NDPPP Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) removal Calibration with Black Board Self-calibration (BBS & SageCal) 20

Calibration: Basics Calibration challenges of wide field imaging: The visibility function is not dominated by a single source. A good model for the sky is needed to start (see MSSS). M51 field 21

Calibration: Basics Phase variations: The ionosphere can change over minutes and patches can extend over few degrees on the sky - need multiple solutions across the primary beam. Clock drifts will effect the phase (for non-core Stations only). Amplitude variations: The ionosphere will also change the gain. The beam is also changing, so the response to a source varies during the observation. -> Direction dependent gains must be determined 22

Calibration: Ionospheric Waves 23

Calibration: Faraday Rotation Differential Faraday Rotation: Ionospheric rotation measure (RM) varies from station to station and converts Stokes I visibilities to Stokes V. Need to carry out calibration using full stokes. 24

Calibration: Changing Gains Unlike typical dish-based interferometers (e.g. JVLA, WSRT) the gain (amplitude) of the visibilities are not (almost) constant. Due to the source moving through the beam, effectively the change in the projected area of the station. Need beam correction in the calibration. 25

Calibration: Changing Gains Unlike typical dish-based interferometers (e.g. JVLA, WSRT) the gain (amplitude) of the visibilities are not (almost) constant. Due to the source moving through the beam, effectively the change in the projected area of the station. Need beam correction in the calibration. 25

Calibration: The RIME RIME: The radio interferometer measurement equation is solved during the calibration process, Baseline based, non closing errors Gain amplitude and phase Errors due to elevation Opacity and path length variation Observed visibility for ant. i and j V obs ij = M ij B ij G ij D ij E ij P ij T ij V true ij true visibility for ant. i and j Bandpass response Instrumental polarization Change in paralactic angle Jones matrices only valid for solving in one direction, need multiple solutions to the RIME - Direction dependent effects. 26

BBS A software package has been developed for LOFAR - Black-Board Self Calibration (see Tutorials). Has the ability to: Carry out parallel processing of multiple sub-bands - global solve across frequency to increase the SNR of the solutions (not standalone). Can predict the observed visibility function for a given sky model [predict] Carry out direction dependent solutions (amplitudes / phases). [solve] Carry out a subtraction of model sources from the uv-data. [subtract] Carry out full Stokes calibration. [correct] 27

BBS Parset file Example, very simple BBS parset file that solves for the amplitude and gain solutions given a sky model. Single direction solution 50 28

Building the sky model Can provide a text file containing a list of sources/source components (delta function, Gaussians, Shaplets). Build using existing catalogues. Build using model images (e.g. at different frequency or exisiting data, i.e. selfcal) and Fourier transform into a model column of the MS Add to BBS parset file. 29

Model building tips Model resolution should be comparable to your observation resolution - think about your longest baseline. Include all the flux in the primary beam or bright sources far away - think about what sky each visibility is sampling. Simulate your model and image it. Make a large image of the uncalibrated data to spot far away, bright sources that need to be included in the model. 30

Inspect solutions Looking at your gain solutions and inspect the corrected data for obvious errors. 31

Inspect solutions Bad Amp. Spikes Good 32

Post calibration errors...ddes 33

Direction dependent gains: BBS There will always be direction dependent effects in LOFAR data due to the varying beam and ionosphere. BBS can be used given a beam model (determined from the combined anntenna/tile response). Step.solve.Model.DirectionalGain.Enable = T Step.solve.Model.Sources = [src1, src2, CygA] Step.solve.Model.Cache.Enable = T Step.solve.Model.Beam.Enable = T Step.solve.Correlation.Selection = CROSS Step.solve.Correlation.Type = [] Step.solve.Solve.Parms = ["DirectionalGain:*"] Computationally expensive, so can only use a few directions. For averaged data, bandwidth and time smearing effects are not corrected for. 34

Direction dependent gains: SAGECal Space Alternating Generalised Expectation Maximisation Calibration (Yatawatta et al. 2009, Kazemi et al. 2011). First run BBS to calculate Gains and Beam correction (on averaged data). Cluster sources in various directions. Solve for different directional gains with SAGECal (constraints v free parameters). Fast. 35

Imaging The aim of imaging is to determine an accurate surface brightness distribution (positions and flux-densities) of the sky. We need: i) w-projection because the 2-d approximation does not hold over wide fields of view ii) a-projection because the LOFAR beam is constantly changing. iii) Speeeeed! Limits the dynamic range of images, and allows for self-calibration. Simulations show flux-densities recovered at the 1% level. 36

Self-calibration and self-learning... Our calibration can be improved by carrying out self-calibration using the LOFAR data. Build up a better sky model. This needs an imager that correctly measures the sky brightness distribution so that the correct input model can be used... See next talk... Learning to calibrate LOFAR data will not come purely from the Talks presented here, or by reading the cookbook, but from experience... Have a go yourself!!! 37

Looking back at the pipeline... 38