Channel Modelling ETIM10. Propagation mechanisms

Similar documents
EITN85, FREDRIK TUFVESSON ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Chapter 4. Propagation effects. Slides for Wireless Communications Edfors, Molisch, Tufvesson

Propagation mechanisms

Propagation Mechanism

Noise and Propagation mechanisms

Channel Modelling ETIM10. Channel models

UWB Channel Modeling

Channel Modeling ETI 085

EITN85, FREDRIK TUFVESSON, JOHAN KÅREDAL ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Why do we need UWB channel models?

Mobile Radio Propagation Channel Models

The Radio Channel. COS 463: Wireless Networks Lecture 14 Kyle Jamieson. [Parts adapted from I. Darwazeh, A. Goldsmith, T. Rappaport, P.

EITN85, FREDRIK TUFVESSON ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Mobile Communications

Revision of Lecture One

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 6a: Propagation Definitions, Path-based Modeling

Path-loss and Shadowing (Large-scale Fading) PROF. MICHAEL TSAI 2015/03/27

Revision of Lecture One

Session2 Antennas and Propagation

5G Antenna Design & Network Planning

Channel models and antennas

ELEG 5693 Wireless Communications Propagation and Noise Part I

Simulation of Outdoor Radio Channel

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

Radio channel modeling: from GSM to LTE

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

Antennas & Propagation. CSG 250 Fall 2007 Rajmohan Rajaraman

Review of Path Loss models in different environments

Channel modelling repetition

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P The prediction of the time and the spatial profile for broadband land mobile services using UHF and SHF bands

Results from a MIMO Channel Measurement at 300 MHz in an Urban Environment

EEG 816: Radiowave Propagation 2009

Channel models and antennas

Mobile Radio Wave propagation channel- Path loss Models

UNIK4230: Mobile Communications Spring 2013

Wireless Communication System

Channel Models. Spring 2017 ELE 492 FUNDAMENTALS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 1

Wireless Physical Layer Concepts: Part II

UHF Radio Frequency Propagation Model for Akure Metropolis

Antennas and Propagation

5.9 GHz V2X Modem Performance Challenges with Vehicle Integration

Millimeter Wave Small-Scale Spatial Statistics in an Urban Microcell Scenario

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P PROPAGATION BY DIFFRACTION. (Question ITU-R 202/3)

Project = An Adventure : Wireless Networks. Lecture 4: More Physical Layer. What is an Antenna? Outline. Page 1

Written Exam Channel Modeling for Wireless Communications - ETIN10

Channel Modeling and Characteristics

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *

Channel Modelling ETIN10. Directional channel models and Channel sounding

Point to point Radiocommunication

Propagation Modelling White Paper

Chapter 15: Radio-Wave Propagation

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Antennas and Propagation

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

PROPAGATION MODELING 4C4

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

λ iso d 4 π watt (1) + L db (2)

Radio Propagation Fundamentals

Wireless Communication Technologies Course No. 16:332:559 (Spring 2000) Lecture Lalitha Sankaranarayanan

(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:31 min)

The prediction of the time and the spatial profile for broadband land mobile services using UHF and SHF bands

RADIOWAVE PROPAGATION

# DEFINITIONS TERMS. 2) Electrical energy that has escaped into free space. Electromagnetic wave

CHAPTER 6 THE WIRELESS CHANNEL

Experimental Evaluation Scheme of UWB Antenna Performance

Antennas Multiple antenna systems

Basic Propagation Theory

Mobile Hata Model and Walkfisch Ikegami

Basic Radio Physics. Developed by Sebastian Buettrich. ItrainOnline MMTK 1

Chapter 4 DOA Estimation Using Adaptive Array Antenna in the 2-GHz Band

White paper. Long range metering systems : VHF or UHF?

Antennas and Propagation

Autumn Main Exam SEAT NUMBER: STUDENTNUMBER: L--- ~~--~--~--~----~--~--L-~ SURNAME: (FAMILY NAME) OTHER NAMES: LECTURER NAME:

SHORT RANGE PROPAGATION MODEL FOR A VERY WIDEBAND DIRECTIVE CHANNEL AT 5.5 GHZ BAND

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1819

Terrain Reflection and Diffraction, Part One

Lecture 1 Wireless Channel Models

TEMPUS PROJECT JEP Wideband Analysis of the Propagation Channel in Mobile Broadband System

Propagation Channels. Chapter Path Loss

EKT 450 Mobile Communication System

Introduction to wireless systems

UNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?

The MYTHOLOGIES OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION. Tapan K Sarkar

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE FADING CHANNEL CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING

Groundwave Propagation, Part One

Overview. Copyright Remcom Inc. All rights reserved.

Site-Specific Validation of ITU Indoor Path Loss Model at 2.4 GHz

Radio propagation modeling on 433 MHz

EEM.Ant. Antennas and Propagation

Link Budget Calculation

Study of Factors which affect the Calculation of Co- Channel Interference in a Radio Link

Lecture 7/8: UWB Channel. Kommunikations

Unit 3 - Wireless Propagation and Cellular Concepts

Near-Earth Propagation Models

LMS4000 & NCL MHz Radio Propagation

Indoor Path Loss Modeling and Measurements at 2.44 GHz

Antennas and Propagation. Prelude to Chapter 4 Propagation

Evaluation of Power Budget and Cell Coverage Range in Cellular GSM System

Colubris Networks. Antenna Guide

Supporting Network Planning Tools II

Transcription:

Channel Modelling ETIM10 Lecture no: 2 Propagation mechanisms Ghassan Dahman \ Fredrik Tufvesson Department of Electrical and Information Technology Lund University, Sweden 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 1

Contents Free space loss Propagation mechanisms Reflection Transmission Diffraction Scattering Waveguiding Examples from propagation scenarios 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 2

Free-space loss If we assume RX antenna to be isotropic: P RX 4 d 2 P TX d A RX Attenuation between two isotropic antennas in free space is (free-space loss): L free d 4d 2 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 3

Free-space loss Friis law Received power, with antenna gains G TX and G RX : GRXGTX P d P P G G L d 4d RX TX TX RX TX free 2 P d P G L d G RX db TX db TX db free db RX db 4d P G 10log G TX db TX db 10 RX db In free space, the received power decays with distance at a rate = 20 db/decade 2 Valid in the far field only 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 4

Free-space loss What is far field? The free-space loss calculations are only valid in the far field of the antennas. Far-field conditions are assumed far beyond the Rayleigh distance (also known as Fraunhofer distance): d R 2 2 a L where L a is the largest dimesion of the antenna. Another rule of thumb is: At least 10 wavelengths / 2-dipole / Parabolic 2 2r L a d R / 2 / 2 L a 2r 2 8r d R 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 5

Example Cellular phone, height 10 cm, f c =900 MHz Rayleigh distance d R =2*0.1 2 /0.333=6 cm For this device the limit is the 10-lambda rule of thumb. Microwave link, antenna diameter 1.2 m, f c =26 GHz Rayleigh distance d R =2*1.2 2 /0.011=250 m For this device the limit is the Rayleigh distance 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 6

Fresnel Zones Fresnel zones: successive regions where secondary waves have Tx- Rx path length which are greater than the LOS path length (i.e., phase diff=). The radius of the nth zone: = The propagation follows a space loss as long as the first Fresnel zone is clear. 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 7

The reference distance d 0 For path-loss propagation models, a close-in distance d 0 is selected such that it lies in the far-field region. = 10 ( ). 20log( ) d For practical systems in the 1-2 GHz region, d 0 is typically chosen to be 1 m in indoor environments, and 100 m or 1 km for outdoor environments. For distances d>d break, the above equation doesn t hold anymore. 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 8

Propagation mechanisms i r 1 2 t Reflection and transmission Diffraction Scattering Waveguiding 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 9

Reflection and transmission (Snell s law) e r conductivity permittivity 1 2 reflected angle sin t sin e 1 2. transmitted angle t 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 10

TM and TE waves behave differently Reflection coefficient Transmission coefficient 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 11

Ground reflection (2-ray model) For the following scenario the power goes like for distances greater than 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 12

The d -4 law = ( ). ( ) if d = ( ). if d > However.. n=4 is not a universal decay exponent Theoretical model is not fulfilled in practice Breakpoint is rarely where theoretically predicted Second breakpoint at the radio horizon (the curvature of the Earth) 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 13

Transmission through walls layered structures Total transmission coefficient d T T 1T 2 e j 1R 1 R 2 e 2j total reflection coefficient 1 2 e j2 1 1 2 e 2j T 1 T 2 with the electrical length in the wall 2 1 d layer cos t 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 14

Example: The COST-Hata-Model The COST-Hata-Model is formulated as, For suburban or rural environments: where, L = Median path loss (db) f = Frequency of Transmissionn (MHz) h B = Base station height (m) d = Link distance (km) h R = Mobile station height (m) a(h R ) = Mobile station height correction factor 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 15

Diffraction Single or multiple edges makes it possible to go behind corners less pronounced when the wavelength is small compared to objects 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 16

Diffraction, Huygen s principle Each point of a wavefront can be considered as a source of a spherical wave Bending around corners and edges 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 17

Diffraction coefficient by a screen expjk 0 x The diffraction angle + Total field The Fresnel integral is defined F F F exp j t 2 dt. 2 0 with the Fresnel parameter Fresnel integral ) 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 18

Diffraction in real environments For real environments we can represent buildings and objects as multiple screens 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 19

Diffraction by multiple screens: Bullington s method tangent Replace all screens with one equivalent screen Height determined by the steepest angle Simple but a bit optimistic equivalent screen E total expjk 0 x 1 2 expj /4 2 F F 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 20

Diffraction by multiple screens: Epstein-Petersen Method L 1 L 2 L 3 Compute diffraction loss for each screen separately and add the losses L tot =L 1 +L 2 +L 3 Diffraction The same approach is used also for the ITU model, but with an empirical correction factor 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 21

Diffraction by multiple screens: empirical models w The ITU multi-knife-edges model The ITU proposed an extreme simple model for diffraction losses. = + 20 where is the diffraction loss from each separate screen (in db), and is a correcting factor depends Diffraction the distances () among the different screens. The values of :,, are selected from certain assumed distributions that depends on the environment. Q: Use the abovementioned equation to explain the reason behind using the log-normal distribution to model the large-scale fading (shadowing). 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 22

Scattering Specular reflection Specular reflection Scattering Smooth surface Rough surface In all cases the law of reflection is obeyed. Flat surfaces that have much larger dimension than are modeled as reflective services. However, the roughness of such surfaces induces non-specular components (scattering). 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 23

Scattering by rough surfaces: Kirchhoff theory Requires only the probability density function of the surface amplitude assume no shadowing from surface (no influence among different points) calculate an effective reflection coefficient for the surface for Gaussian surface distribution angle of incidence rough smooth exp 2 k 0 h sin 2 standard deviation of height 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 24

Scattering by rough surfaces: Perturbation theory Spatial correlation function h 2 W E r h r h r 2-D location vectors h r h r More accurate than Kirchhoff theory, especially for large angles of incidence and rougher surfaces Generalizes Kirchhoff theory Include shadowing effects by the surface includes spatial correlation of surface how fast are the changes in height calculate an effective reflection coefficient for the surface 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 25

Modeling received power due to scattering in the far field (urban mobile systems) For urban mobile systems, the following model is used to compute the received power due to scattering in the far field. = + + 20 + [ ] 30 log 4 20 20 where and are the distances from the scattering object to Tx and Rx. RCS (Radar Cross Section) is the surface area of the scattering object. In several European cities, for medium and large buildings located 5 10 km away, RCS values were found to be in the range 14.1dB to 55.7dB. 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 26

Waveguiding This process models propagation in street canyons, corridors, and tunnels. In wireless channels, this process deviates from the ideal assumptions (e.g., street crossings, rough surfaces, cars, pedestrians, ) Propagation measurements fitted a law, where n varies between 1.5 and 5. 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 27

How does the signal reach the receiver Outdoor-to-indoor transmitter receiver 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 28

2337 How does the signal reach the receiver In the office 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 29

How does the signal leave the transmitter at the roof 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 30

In all offices 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 31

How does the signal reach the receiver outdoor urban h=23 m h=29 m h=29 m 0 N W E S -50 177 Cathedr al RX3 20 53 h=30 m Yar d 80 Street 1 TX3-140 130-170 135 100 200 m 0 h=30 m h=28 m h=28 m BOF h=25 m h=24 m h60 m Transmitter Mottagare 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 32

Signal arrives from some specific areas Cathedral Through yard Over BOF Street 1 Street 2 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 33

Diffraction, reflection, scattering, transmission 2012-01-20 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETIM10 34

Outdoor 300 MHz peer-to-peer scenario Center frequency: 285 MHz, 20MHz bandwidth Peer-to-peer measurement: TX, 1.8m (BS) RX, 2.1m (MS) Four routes: 322, 320, 80, 110 m semi-rural scenario sub-urban scenario

Digital 3D map of the environment

Visualized paths for a particular Tx/Rx position

Interaction points, 20 strongest MPCs LOS NLOS Radius of circles reflects power, color reflects delay

Interaction points, 20 strongest MPCs NLOS NLOS Radius of circles reflects power, color reflects delay

Multipath components tend to appear in clusters, moving Rx Dead cluster As Rx is moving (10 wavelengths, approximately 10 meters), clusters disappear and new clusters appear. Active clusters during the Rx movement New cluster