1 The Importance of Impact in Horizon 2020 PRESENTER Dr. Seán McCarthy Hyperion Ltd sean.mccarthy@hyperion.ie EARMA Conference July 2013 2 COURSE CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 Impact in Horizon 2020 The Big Picture (Value Chains/Stakeholder Analysis) Routes to Impact Selecting Partners to Increase Impact 5 The Role of the Manager
3 Horizon 2020: From Policy to Programmes Politicians European Commission 2 Programme Planning Phase (2013) ers 4 Proposed Structure of Horizon 2020 Pillar I Excellent Science European Council Future and Emerging Technologies Marie Curie Actions Infrastructures EIT Euratom JRC Pillar II Industrial Leadership Pillar III Societal Challenges - Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies: (Information and communication technologies, Nanotechnology, Advanced Materials, Advanced Manufacturing Processes Biotechnology, Space) -Innovation in SMEs - Access to Risk Finance Health, demographic change and wellbeing Food security, sustainable agriculture and the bio-economy Secure, clean and efficient energy Smart, green and integrated transport Climate action and resource efficiency + raw materials Inclusive, innovative and secure societies
5 Impact Factors (Horizon 2020) Specific Programme Excellent Science ERC FET Marie Curie Infrastructure Share of publications from ERC funded projects which are among the top 1 % highly cited Number of institutional policy and national/regional policy measures inspired by ERC funding Publications in peer-reviewed high impact journals Patent applications in Future and Emerging Technologies Cross-sector and cross-country circulation of researchers, including PhD candidates infrastructures which are made accessible to all researchers in Europe and beyond through Union support Source: Annex II Proposal for Horizon 2020 6 Impact Factors (Horizon 2020) Specific Programme Industrial Leadership Societal Challenges Enabling Industrial Access to Risk Finance Innovation in SMEs Patent applications obtained in the different enabling and industrial technologies Total investments mobilised via debt financing and Venture Capital investments Share of participating SMEs introducing innovations new to the company or the market (covering the period of the project plus three years) Publications in peer-reviewed high impact journals Patent applications Number of Union pieces of legislation referring to activities supported in the area of the different Societal Challenges Source: Annex II Proposal for Horizon 2020
Impact Assessment Report (Horizon 2020) The overall results from the analysis of 726 projects under Evimp-2, representing EUR 992 million of EU-funding, reveal the following: The projects have generated or are expected to generate the following results in the short term: 3 724 prototypes/demonstrators/pilots, 747 new software tools, 18 974 publications, 2 152 doctorates, 310 inputs into technical standards, 423 inputs into EU legislation texts, 1 077 patent applications, 204 registered designs and other forms (IPR) the creation of 248 spin-off companies. 7 Source: Impact Assessment Report for Horizon 2020 8 Notes The criterion of impact shall be given a higher weighting for proposals for close-to-market actions. Source: Council Compromise on Horizon 2020 August 2012 6.2 Evaluation and monitoring under Horizon 2020 The new system for policy and programme evaluation and monitoring which will be implemented under Horizon 2020 will provide a strong focus on the assessment of outputs and impacts. Source: Annual Monitoring Report 2011
9 COURSE CONTENTS Impact in Horizon 2020 2 The Big Picture (Value Chains/Stakeholder Analysis) Routes to Impact Selecting Partners to Increase Impact The Role of the Manager 10 The Big Picture Value Chains/Stakeholder Diagram/ecosystem Lead User for Project Results Project TRL9 TRL8 TRL7 TRL6 TRL5 TRL4 TRL3 TRL2 TRL1 Innovation Chain End User
11 Technology Readiness Level (NASA) TRL 9 Actual system "mission proven" through successful mission operations (ground or space) TRL 8 Actual system completed and "mission qualified" through test and demonstration in an operational environment (ground or space) TRL 7 System prototyping demonstration in an operational environment (ground or space) TRL 6 System/subsystem model or prototyping demonstration in a relevant end-to-end environment (ground or space) TRL 5 System/subsystem/component validation in relevant environment TRL 4 TRL 3 TRL 2 TRL 1 Component/subsystem validation in laboratory environment Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof-of concept Technology concept and/or application formulated Basic principles observed and reported: 12 How Top Down Priorities are Identified (Lobby) Politicians ERAC (CREST) ERIAB European European Technology Commission Platforms Key Enabling Technologies (KET) European Innovation Partnerships COST Actions/Conferences Joint Programming / ERAnets EU R&D Associations/Networks Expert Advisory Groups Tender Studies/Foresight Studies ers FP7 Projects (especially CSAs) ERIAB (European Innovation Area Board) CSA (Coordination and Support Actions)
/ket.htm Advanced Materials Nanotechnology Micro- and Nanoelectronics Industrial Biotechnology Photonics Advanced Manufacturing Systems 13 Key Enabling Technologies H2020 Proposal (30 th November 2011) 6.7 billion for KETs 14 Technology Platforms Aeronautics Platform (ACARE) Nanomedicine Technology Platform Networked and Electronic Media (NEM)Initiative Networked European Services and Software Initiative (NESSI) Optical Technology Platform Photonics21 Technology Platform Photovoltaics Technology Platform Plant Geneomics Platform Rail Transport Platform (ERRAC) Road Transport Platform (ERTRAC) Robotics Platform (EUROP) Smart Grids Technology Platform Solar Themal Technology Platform (ESTTP) Steel Technology Platform (ESTEP) Textiles and Clothing Platform (ETP-FTC) Water Supply and Sanitation Technology Platform (WSSTP) http://cordis.europa.eu/technology-platforms/
15 Technology Platforms Biofuels Technology Platform Chemistry Technology Platform Construction Technology Platform (ECTP) Embedded Systems Technology Platform (ARTEMIS) EuMAT (Advanced Materials and Technologies) Food for Life Technology Platform (Food) Forestry Technology Platform Global Animal Health (GAH) Grid Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Technology Platform Industrial Safety Platform Innovative Medicines Platform Integral Satcom Initiative (ISI) Manufacturing Technology Platform (MANUFUTURE) Maritime Transport Platform (WATERBORNE) Mobile Communications and Wireless Technology Platform (emobility) Nanoelectronics Platform (ENIAC) http://cordis.europa.eu/technology-platforms/ 16 Foresight Activities 1. EFFLA (European Forum for Forward Looking Activities) http://www.foresight-platform.eu/ 2. European Foresight Platform http://foresight-network.eu 3. EFMN (European Foresight Monitoring Network) www.efmn.info 4. JRC Forlearn http://forlearn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.htm 5. FARHorizon http://farhorizon.portals.mbs.ac.uk/ 6. IKNOW (Wild cards or weak signals) http://community.iknowfutures.eu/pg/file/popper/view/2190/jointforesight-towards-a-mechanism-for-joint-programming-in-europe 7. INFU (Innovation Foresight) http://www.innovation-futures.org/ 8. SANDERA (Security Foresight) http://www.sandera.portals.mbs.ac.uk/ 9. SESTI (Scanning Emerging Science and Technology Issues) http://www.sesti.info/ /foresight.htm
17 COURSE CONTENTS Impact in Horizon 2020 The Big Picture (Value Chains/Stakeholder Analysis) 3 Routes to Impact Selecting Partners to Increase Impact The Role of the Manager 18 Examples of Value Chains or Systems Basic Applied??? Product/ Service Society New Knowledge Further R&D Improved Facilities New Advice Public Policies Technical Standards Patents Licences Protection Products Services Business Models Public Info
19 Value Chain for Photonics Materials and Process Equipment Components Modules Service Providers Content Silicon GaAs InP Lasers Fibre Filters LCDs PDP LED arrays ISP Telecoms Cable InGaN LEDs Back Lights Laser Polymer Detectors Imaging Processing Project MEMS Connectors Telecoms Energy Crystals Phosphors Switches Mux/Demux Optic Optical media heads Solar Cells Generation Medical Treatment Source: Photonics: A UK Strategy for Success Telecom VoIP Video TV email ecommerce Surveillance Pictures Sensing 20 Value Chain: Biotechnology Identify Target and Compound Development Animal Validation Phase I: Tolerability/Toxicity Phase II: Efficacy Phase III: Effectiveness FDA/EMA Approval New Drug Project FDA (Federal Drugs Administration) (USA) EMA European Medicines Agency (EU)
21 Pathway for Development of New Standards Industrial and Social Need Identified Programming Participation of all interests Request Business Planning + Drafting through planning and consensus Use Existing Document (e.g. ISO) Transferring to ISO (Vienna Agreement) Set-up New Technical Committee Project Validation through public enquiry and voting Availability and National Transportation Source: Georg Hongler Secretary General, CEN IPTS Report No 35 22 WEBSITE FOR STANDARDS CEN (CEN/STAR) CENELEC ETSI ISO IEC ITU ASTM www.cenorm.be www.cenelec.be www.etsi.fr www.iso.ch www.iec.ch www.itu.ch www.astm.org 449 TIP
23 Value Chain: Photovoltaic System Frame Glass Cells Mounting PV Modules Wiring * * * Assemble Array Inverter PV Array Control Integration of Components Commissioning PV System Energy Project Project 24 The Policy Making Process (e.g. Migration) Cultural Group Migrant advocacy groups Scientific Evidence + Indicators Government departments (Education, Justice, Health, Children) Parliament Media Museums Information/ education Public Scientific Evidence Scientific Evidence on Inter-Cultural Communication
25 COURSE CONTENTS Impact in Horizon 2020 The Big Picture (Value Chains/Stakeholder Analysis) Routes to Impact 4 Selecting Partners to Increase Impact The Role of the Manager 26 Partners for Photonics Company 1 Company 2 Company 3 Materials (GaAs) Components (LEDs) Modules (LED array) Service (Energy Saving) Energy TRL9 TRL8 TRL7 TRL6 TRL5 TRL4 TRL3 TRL2 TRL1 Company 2?????? Partner
27 The Policy Making Process (e.g. Migration) Lead Users Cultural Group Migrant advocacy groups Scientific Evidence + Indicators Government departments (Education, Justice, Health, Children) Parliament Media Museums Information/ education Public Partners Scientific Evidence Scientific Evidence on Inter-Cultural Communication 28 Impact in Horizon 2020 Proposals The Lead User MUST be a partner in the project The Lead User writes the Impact section Begin the proposal with the Impact section Impact workpackage = Dissemination and Use Plan Include budget for Dissemination and Use (2-3%) During project designate an Impact Manager
29 COURSE CONTENTS Impact in Horizon 2020 The Big Picture (Value Chains/Stakeholder Analysis) Routes to Impact Selecting Partners to Increase Impact 5 The Role of the Manager 30 Tips for the Manager Define the Big Picture Describe the Stakeholder Diagram or Value Chain Identify the Lead Users Identify the Outputs convert to Lead User Outcomes Select partners who are Lead Users Ensure Impact is written by the Lead Users