How U.S. Employment Is Changing

Similar documents
BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT DYNAMICS

BACCARAT: A LONGITUDINAL MICRO-STUDY

Taking the Measure of St. Louis

NEWS RELEASE FOR WIRE TRANSMISSION: 8:30 A.M. EDT, FRIDAY, APRIL 17, William Zeile: (202) BEA 09-14

SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION FACTBOOK

Volume Title: Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data. Volume Author/Editor: Timothy Dunne, J. Bradford Jensen, and Mark J.

2012 Small Business Leadership Forum hosted by CFO Jeff Atwater and the Jim Moran Institute

Government of Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources Bureau of Labor Statistics BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT DYNAMICS: FOURTH QUARTER

PLUS REVIEW Q Quarterly Economic Indicators 18 Counties of Northeast Ohio

Technology Innovations: Powering or Pummeling the Economy?

Small Business Landscape 2016: Cause for Cautious Optimism

BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT DYNAMICS THIRD QUARTER

Produced by the BPDA Research Division:

The Unexpectedly Large Census Count in 2000 and Its Implications

ROBOT INVESTMENTS SURGE TO RECORD LEVELS Latest data

Canadian Consumer Confidence Index A TNS News Release April 18, 2013

Farmingdale State College. News Clips. September The Office of Institutional Advancement 2350 Broadhollow Road Farmingdale New York

ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT. A Summary of the San Diego Regional Economy UNEMPLOYMENT

Insight: Measuring Manhattan s Creative Workforce. Spring 2017

The 2013 Hilliard Lyons INVESTKentucky Equity Conference

SAN DIEGO S QUARTERLY ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT

Michigan Traffic Crash Facts Historical Perspective

Center for Business and Economic Research. Samuel Addy, Ahmad Ijaz, Carolyn Trent, Kathleen Gabler Authors. Carolyn Trent Project Manager

Patent Trends among Small and Large Innovative Firms during the Recession

Missouri Economic Indicator Brief: Manufacturing Industries

Commission on science and Technology for Development. Ninth Session Geneva, May2006

THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR THE U.S. AND THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Speech by Lars Renström, President and CEO AGM Ladies and gentlemen, shareholders and co-workers,

The State of Georgia Small Business

Long-run trend, Business Cycle & Short-run shocks in real GDP

WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF GE CAPITAL TO THE FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY COMMISSION

NJEN: STATE AND FEDERAL RESOURCES FOR ENTREPRENEURS. April 13, 2016

How Entrepreneurial is the UK?

Special Report. May 18, This leaves plenty. of spoils to be gained. by the SME that is adept enough to navigate. products and services in

IXIA S PUBLIC ART SURVEY 2013 SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS. Published February 2014

Real Estate Trends and Outlook

ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT. A Summary of the San Diego Regional Economy UNEMPLOYMENT

The Economic Contribution of Canada s R&D Intensive Enterprises Dr. H. Douglas Barber Dr. Jeffrey Crelinsten

From Disruptive Decline to Gradual Recovery: 2009 in Review

2012 ACCE Industry Advisory Board Best Practices Positioning Your Firm After the Great Recession

economy City of Rohnert Park : Local Economic Report EDB Sonoma County

Plan I. Fostering innovation for long-term growth. 5 February Stian Westlake, Exec Dir of Policy &

Dr. Greg Hallman Director, Real Estate Finance and Investment Center (REFIC) McCombs School of Business University of Texas at Austin

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND INNOVATION - DECISIVE FACTORS OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

The future of work. Nav Singh Managing Partner, Boston McKinsey & Company

Caroline Freund Presentation at the IBC Tel Aviv December 7, 2015

Oft-overlooked SBA program appears poised for comeback

What is the economic rationale for industry consolidation

2014 PRODUCTION FORECASTS FOR THE GLOBAL ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES

Good afternoon. I m Kazuharu Watanabe. I will be presenting an overview of the Company s financial results for 1 3Q FY2019/3.

The Florida Turnaround Story

Silicon Wafer Demand Outlook: Forecast Update, 2Q03

Chapter 1 Introduction and Concepts

1Q04 Update: Silicon Demand Will Move to a Full Recovery

Profile of the British Columbia High Technology Sector: 2013 Edition

Volume Title: Ebb and Flow in Trade Unionism. Volume URL: Chapter Title: Union Growth Before the World War

PSC. Research Report. The Unexpectedly Large Census Count in 2000 and Its Implications P OPULATION STUDIES CENTER. Reynolds Farley. Report No.

Improving local economy boosts quarterly results

2007 Major Business Expansion Activity in Southern California

Interested Parties. From: Stephanie Cutter, Deputy Campaign Manager. Romney s Real Record in Massachusetts

Global Trends in Patenting

How New York State Exaggerated Potential Job Creation from Shale Gas Development

Dollars and Sense. John Nolan Vice President Steel Dynamics, Inc. Fort Wayne, IN USA

June-December 2012 ANALYSIS OF THE ONLINE GAME TYPE (TABLE) (CHARTS) OF OPERATORS

Impact of the Great Recession on Innovation R&D Spending

Potential effect on employment in developed and developing countries

Artist Employment Projections through 2018

2019 Marketing Planning Guide

The Economic Census and Its Role in Economic Statistics

Puppet State of DevOps Market Segmentation Report. Contents

A Historical Perspective on Tech Job Growth

The Critical Path. Positioning Maryland as an Innovation Leader in the Global Construction Industry

Atlanta Industrial Market Overview

Opinion Poll. Illinois Small Business Owners Support Legislation Reforming Patent System. April 29, 2014

VALUE OF GOODS EXPORTS INCREASED BY 15 PER CENT IN 2017 Trade deficit lower than the year before

Silicon Valley Venture Capital Survey Second Quarter 2018

NAB QUARTERLY SME SURVEY 2018 Q2

VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTING REACHES HIGHEST LEVEL SINCE Q WITH $13.0 BILLION INVESTED DURING Q2 2014, ACCORDING TO THE MONEYTREE REPORT

Test-Curriculum Alignment Study for MCAS Grades 4 and 7 ELA. and Grades 4, 6, and 8 Mathematics 1, 2. Ronald K. Hambleton and Yue Zhao

1997 Annual Surveys of Journalism & Mass Communication Survey of Enrollments Survey of Graduates

US Productivity After the Dot Com Bust

The drivers of productivity dynamics over the last 15 years 1

The percentage of Series A rounds declined significantly, to 12% of all deals.

8(A) CONTRACTING, MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ PROGRAM, & JOINT VENTURES. March 9, 2010 William T. Welch

UCT Coatings, Inc. Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Financial Report And Shareholder Letter

2O2O WOMEN ON BOARDS GENDER DIVERSITY INDEX

Half-Year Press Conference

The Robotics Market Has Arrived! What Challenges and Opportunities Exist? Perspectives from Asia, the US and Europe

Profitability, Long Waves and the Recurrence of General Crises

Micro, Small and Mediumsized. and Entrepreneurship education in China. Dr. Liu Jiesheng Vice President of Jinan University

McKinsey Global Institute. May Trading myths: Addressing misconceptions about trade, jobs, and competitiveness

Report on Operations 1999

Size of California s economy US$ trillions, 2009

Research on the Impact of R&D Investment on Firm Performance in China's Internet of Things Industry

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH ESTIMATES OF MONTHLY GDP. Embargo until hours on 11 th January 2013

Interim Report January March

ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT. A Summary of the San Diego Regional Economy UNEMPLOYMENT

Economic and Real Estate Market Outlook

Fit for the future 17th Annual Global CEO Survey

Service Science: A Key Driver of 21st Century Prosperity

Transcription:

December 1, 211 How U.S. Employment Is Changing Stephen P. A. Brown and Hui Liu During the most recent recession, U.S. employment fell by 7,49 million jobs (5.4 percent). During the first 8 months of the recovery, U.S. employment fell another 1,247 million jobs, which reduced employment to 6.3 percent below the prerecession peak. Since hitting bottom in February 21, U.S. employment has risen by only 2,27 million jobs. As of September 211, U.S. employment stands 4.7 percent below its prerecession peak. If we peek under the hood and look at job destruction and creation and firm size, we see a substantial change in U.S. businesses. As shown in Figure 1, the decline in U.S. employment during the most recent recession was much greater than the average for the previous ten post World War II recessions, and the recovery has been much slower. The 21 recession did not reduce employment by as much, but the recovery in employment began later and was slower. At 3 months after the trough of the 27 9 recession, employment was 1.8 percent above its low value. At 3 months since the trough of the 21 recession, employment was.9 percent above its low value. 14 Peak = 1 Figure 1. Payroll Employment Over the Business Cycle 12 Average of Previous Recessions 1 98 21 Recession 96 94 27 9 Recession 92 9

Job Destruction and Creation In a dynamic economy, the overall change in employment is the result of job creation and job destruction. As shown in Figure 2, gross job gains in U.S. businesses generally exceed gross job losses when the economy is expanding. During the 21 and 27 9 recessions, the United States saw net job losses, with increases in gross job losses and decreases in gross job gains. In the run up to the 21 recession, the economy saw a high level of job churn as both gross job gains and gross job losses increased. After the 21 recession, both gross job gains and gross job losses stabilized at lower rates than were seen before the recession. Prior to the 27 9 recession, gross job losses began rising and gross job gains began falling. During the recession (December 27 to June 29), the private sector lost a total of 6,655, jobs. From early 29 through the end of 21, gross job losses declined sharply and gross job gains rose slowly. These dynamics suggest a less robust labor market in which people were holding on to their jobs and companies were holding onto their people, and hiring was proceeding at a cautious pace. Private sector employment hit bottom in January 21, seven months after the recession ended in June 29. During those seven months, the private sector lost another 1,191, jobs. Since January 21, private sector employment has increased by a total of 2,445, jobs. (Data for gross job gains and gross job losses are only available through fourth quarter 21.) Figure 2. Job Gains and Losses, All Businesses 9 8 7 6 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 2

Job Destruction and Creation at Small Sized Firms Small businesses (firms with less than 5 employees) account for 45.3 percent of U.S. private sector employment, and historically they have been one of the more dynamic forces in the job market. From 1992 through 21, small businesses accounted for 43.7 percent of the gross job gains and 44.1 percent of the gross job losses, but only 32.1 percent of the net job gains. In the process, small businesses created an average of 75, more jobs per quarter than they lost (Figure 3). Over the same period, all businesses created an average of 234, more jobs per quarter than they lost. During the 27 9 recession and subsequent recovery, however, small businesses contributed less to the loss in private sector employment and more to the gains. During the recession, small businesses showed a net loss of 2,25, jobs, accounting for 33.8 percent of the net employment loss in the private sector. From the recession s end through January 21, small businesses showed a net loss of another 43, jobs, accounting for 36.1 percent of the net employment loss in the private sector. Since January 21, small businesses added a net of 1,246, jobs, accounting for 51. percent of net employment gain in the private sector. (Data for gross job gains and gross job losses are only available through fourth quarter 21.) Figure 3. Job Gains and Losses, Small Businesses 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 3

Job Destruction and Creation at Medium Sized Firms Medium businesses (firms with 5 to 499 employees) account for 38.7 percent of U.S. privatesector employment, and historically they have been a relatively stable factor in the U.S. job market. From 1992 through 21, medium businesses accounted for 2.3 percent of the gross job gains and 19.9 percent of the gross job losses, and 32.4 percent of the net job gains. In the process, medium businesses created an average of 76, more jobs per quarter than they lost (Figure 4). During the 27 9 recession and subsequent recovery, medium businesses contributed greatly to the changes in private sector employment. During the recession, medium businesses showed a net loss of 3,44, jobs, accounting for 45.7 percent of the net employment loss in the private sector. From the recession s end through January 21, medium businesses showed a net loss of another 448, jobs, accounting for 37.6 percent of the net employment loss in the private sector. Since January 21, medium businesses added a net of 1,148, jobs, accounting for a robust 47. percent of net employment gain in the private sector. (Data for gross job gains and gross job losses are only available through fourth quarter 21.) Figure 4. Job Gains and Losses, Medium Businesses 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 4

Job Destruction and Creation at Large Sized Firms Large businesses (firms with more than 499 employees) account for 16. percent of U.S. privatesector employment, and historically they have been a relatively stable factor in the U.S. job market. From 1992 through 21, large businesses accounted for 18.7 percent of the gross job gains, 18.1 percent of the gross job losses, and 35.8 percent of the net job gains. In the process, large businesses created an average of 84, more jobs per quarter than they lost (Figure 5). During the 27 9 recession and subsequent recovery, however, large businesses contributed greatly to the loss in private sector employment but not much to the gains. During the recession, large businesses showed a net loss of 1,361, jobs, accounting for 2.5 percent of the net employment loss in the private sector. From the recession s end through January 21, large businesses showed a net loss of another 313, jobs, accounting for 26.2 percent of the net employment loss in the private sector. Since January 21, large businesses added a net of 51, jobs, accounting for only 2.1 percent of the net employment gain in the private sector. (Data for gross job gains and gross job losses are only available through fourth quarter 21.) Figure 5. Job Gains and Losses, Large Businesses 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; CBER 5

The Changing Role of U.S. Businesses The changes in the labor market during the 27 9 recession and subsequent recovery portend a changing of the guard in U.S. businesses. Historically, small businesses are one of the more dynamic elements of the U.S. job market accounting for much of the churn in employment but less of the net job gain. In contrast, medium and large businesses are relatively stable, with less job churn and more of the net job gain. During the 27 9 recession and subsequent recovery, these historical observations have not held. Compared to historical averages, small businesses accounted for a smaller percentage of the net job losses and a greater percentage of the net job gains in private sector employment. Medium businesses were relatively dynamic accounting for a high percentage of the net job losses and a high percentage of the net job gains. Large businesses accounted for a larger percentage of the net job losses and a much smaller percentage of the net job gains. These changes from previous historical patterns suggest that large businesses, who are sitting on sizable profits and cash reserves, are failing to reinvest in the U.S. economy and employment. Rather than seeing the effects of a lack of confidence that is percolating up from the bottom of the economy to the top, we are seeing the effects of a lack of confidence that is percolating down from the top of the economy to the bottom. We may also be witnessing the creation of the future, as employment shifts from old, large businesses in established industries to new, small businesses in emerging industries. The shift in employment from large businesses and small businesses also may have implications for health insurance coverage and other benefits. Smaller firms typically offer fewer employee benefits than larger firms. Stephen P. A. Brown, Ph.D. Director, Center for Business and Economic Research University of Nevada, Las Vegas Hui Liu Graduate Assistant, Center for Business and Economic Research University of Nevada, Las Vegas 6