Calibration. Ron Maddalena NRAO Green Bank November 2012

Similar documents
Fundamentals of the GBT and Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena

Single Dish Observing Techniques and Calibration

Spectral Line Calibration Techniques with Single Dish Telescopes. K. O Neil NRAO - GB

New Algorithm for High-Accuracy, Low- Baseline-Shape Frequency Switching

A Quick Review. Spectral Line Calibration Techniques with Single Dish Telescopes. The Rayleigh-Jeans Approximation. Antenna Temperature

Observing Techniques and Calibration. David Frayer (Green Bank Observatory)

Guide to observation planning with GREAT

Spectral Line Calibration Techniques with Single Dish Telescopes. K. O Neil NRAO - GB

The 4mm (68-92 GHz) Receiver

Recent Astronomical Commissioning Results for the Ka-band ( GHz) Receiver

More Radio Astronomy

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

EVLA Scientific Commissioning and Antenna Performance Test Check List

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

THEORY OF MEASUREMENTS

EVLA Memo #119 Wide-Band Sensitivity and Frequency Coverage of the EVLA and VLA L-Band Receivers

ALMA water vapour radiometer project

EVLA System Commissioning Results

The WVR at Effelsberg. Thomas Krichbaum

Chapter 5. SPECTRAL LINE OBSERVING 1

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 1. Basic Radio/mm Astronomy

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

Submillimeter (continued)

OPTICS OF SINGLE BEAM, DUAL BEAM & ARRAY RECEIVERS ON LARGE TELESCOPES J A M E S W L A M B, C A L T E C H

Millimetre and Radio Astronomy Techniques for Star Forma:on Studies II

The Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared (HIFI) and its data

Multiplying Interferometers

MMA Memo 143: Report of the Receiver Committee for the MMA

A new K-band (18-26 GHz) 7-horn multi-feed receiver: Calibration campaign at Medicina 32 m dish

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jun 2006

Receiver Performance and Comparison of Incoherent (bolometer) and Coherent (receiver) detection

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

EVLA Memo 103 Performance Tests of the EVLA K- and Q-Band Systems

EVLA Technical Performance

Telescope, Receiver, and Radiometry

Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

EVLA Memo 137 Performance Tests of the EVLA K, Ka, and Q-Band Receivers

VLBI Post-Correlation Analysis and Fringe-Fitting

Microwave-Radiometer

Symmetry in the Ka-band Correlation Receiver s Input Circuit and Spectral Baseline Structure NRAO GBT Memo 248 June 7, 2007

Pointing and Amplitude Calibration in Theory and Practice Jay Blanchard Joint Institute for VLBI - ERIC

Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy

Chapter 3. Instrumentation. 3.1 Telescope Site Layout. 3.2 Telescope Optics

The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation B. Winstein, U of Chicago

Sideband Smear: Sideband Separation with the ALMA 2SB and DSB Total Power Receivers

Components of Imaging at Low Frequencies: Status & Challenges

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Green Bank, West Virginia Electronics Division Internal Report No 76

Technical Considerations: Nuts and Bolts Project Planning and Technical Justification

Specifications for the GBT spectrometer

GBT Spectral-Line Data Reduction and Tutorials. David Frayer (Green Bank Observatory)

To print higher-resolution math symbols, click the Hi-Res Fonts for Printing button on the jsmath control panel.

ALMA Sensitivity Metric for Science Sustainability Projects

Tilted Beam Measurement of VLBI Receiver for the South Pole Telescope

Comparing MMA and VLA Capabilities in the GHz Band. Socorro, NM Abstract

Wide Bandwidth Imaging

suppose we observed a 10 Jy calibrator with CARMA for 1 year, 24 hrs/day how much energy would we collect? S ηa Δν t

IF/LO Systems for Single Dish Radio Astronomy Centimeter Wave Receivers

NEWTON TRAINING (2018):

Chapter 41 Deep Space Station 13: Venus

Array noise temperature measurements at the Parkes PAF Test-bed Facility

Figure 1 Photo of an Upgraded Low Band Receiver

Practical Aspects of Focal Plane Array Testing

EVLA Memo #166 Comparison of the Performance of the 3-bit and 8-bit Samplers at C (4 8 GHz), X (8 12 GHz) and Ku (12 18 GHz) Bands

AGRON / E E / MTEOR 518 Laboratory

When, why and how to self-cal Nathan Brunetti, Crystal Brogan, Amanda Kepley

EVLA Real-Time Science Software Requirements

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE RADIOMETER

Phased Array Feeds for the SKA. WP2.2.3 PAFSKA Consortium CSIRO ASTRON DRAO NRAO BYU OdP Nancay Cornell U Manchester

Observing Modes and Real Time Processing

Coherent Receivers Principles Downconversion

C-band Circular Corrugated horn for the SRT. Beam Waveguide Focus. L. Cresci, P. Curioni, V. Natale, R. Nesti, A.Orfei, D. Panella, J.

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.733-1* (Question ITU-R 42/4 (1990))**

d (Eqn 2), Source temperature distribution, Normalized antenna pattern 4 A Antenna gain as a power ratio

LOFAR: Special Issues

G. Serra.

What does reciprocity mean

Detrimental Interference Levels at Individual LWA Sites LWA Engineering Memo RFS0012

ALMA Memo XXX Bandpass Calibration for ALMA

A Method for Gain over Temperature Measurements Using Two Hot Noise Sources

Calibration Issues for the MMA

PdBI data calibration. Vincent Pie tu IRAM Grenoble

Signal Flow & Radiometer Equation. Aletha de Witt AVN-Newton Fund/DARA 2018 Observational & Technical Training HartRAO

ARRAY CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL POWER CALIBRATION FOR LEDA

EVLA Antenna and Array Performance. Rick Perley

Radio Astronomy: SKA-Era Interferometry and Other Challenges. Dr Jasper Horrell, SKA SA (and Dr Oleg Smirnov, Rhodes and SKA SA)

Spectral Line II: Calibration and Analysis. Spectral Bandpass: Bandpass Calibration (cont d) Bandpass Calibration. Bandpass Calibration

Argus Users Guide. David Frayer (Green Bank Observatory)

Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy. Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Arecibo Observatory, 2008 Jan. 13

Calibration. (in Radio Astronomy) Ishwara Chandra CH NCRA-TIFR. Acknowledgments:

J/K). Nikolova

Sub-millimeter Wave Planar Near-field Antenna Testing

1.6 Beam Wander vs. Image Jitter

Pointing Calibration Steps

L- and S-Band Antenna Calibration Using Cass. A or Cyg. A

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

System Parameters Affecting LWA Calibration (Memo 52 Redux)

Overview of the SKA. P. Dewdney International SKA Project Engineer Nov 9, 2009

The Q/U Imaging ExperimenT (QUIET) receivers Coherent Polarimeter Arrays at 40 and 90 GHz

Transcription:

Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO Green Bank November 2012

Receiver calibration sources allow us to convert the backend s detected voltages to the intensity the signal had at the point in the system where the calibration signal is injected.

Reference observations Difference a signal observation with a reference observation ypes of reference observations Frequency Switching In or Out-of-band Position Switching Beam Switching Move Subreflector Receiver beam-switch Dual-Beam Nodding Move telescope Move Subreflector

Position-Switched (On-Off) Observing Noise Diode Signal Signal Detector

ypical Position-Switched Calibration Equation for a Point Source S( ) A ( ) Ref Sys 2k A (, Elev) Area Sig( ) Ref Ref ( ) Ref On ( ) Ref ( ) ( ) Ref Off p Ref Sys ( ) A Cal ( ) e ( ) (, t) A( Elev, t) BW A(Elev,t) = Air Mass τ(ν,t) = Atmospheric Zenith Opacity cal = Noise Diode emperature Area = Physical area of the telescope η A (ν,elev) =Aperture efficiency (point sources) A (ν) = Source Antenna emperature S(ν) = Source Flux Density Sig(ν), Ref (ν) = Data taken on source and on blank sky (in units backend counts) On,Off = Data taken with the noise diode on and off sys = System emperature averaged over bandwidth

Position-Switched Calibration Equation S ν η A (, Elev 2k Sig( ) Ref ( ) Ref ( ) τ(ν)a ( Elev) Cal ( ) e ) Area p Ref ( ) RefOn( ) RefOff ( ) Sources of uncertainties S S 2 A 2 2 2 2 cal η ( A ) Cal η 10-15% accuracy have been the standard Usually, errors in cal dominate Goal: o achieve 5% calibration accuracy without a significant observing overhead.

Air Mass Estimates Depends upon density and index of refraction as a function of height But, how can one get this information?

Air Mass Estimate Air Mass traditionally modeled as 1/sin(Elev) For 1% calibration accuracy, must use a better model below 15 deg. A 0.0234 1.014 5.18 sin Elev Elev 3.35 Good to 1 deg Use 1/sin(Elev) above 60 deg Coefficients are site specific, at some low level

ypical Position-Switched Calibration Equation S( ) A ( ) Ref Sys 2k A (, Elev) Area Sig( ) Ref Ref ( ) Ref On ( ) Ref ( ) ( ) Ref Off p Ref Sys ( ) A Cal ( ) e ( ) (, t) A( Elev, t) BW A(Elev,t) = Air Mass τ(ν,t) = Atmospheric Zenith Opacity cal = Noise Diode emperature Area = Physical area of the telescope η A (ν,elev) =Aperture efficiency (point sources) A (ν) = Source Antenna emperature S(ν) = Source Flux Density Sig(ν), Ref (ν) = Data taken on source and on blank sky (in units backend counts) On,Off = Data taken with the noise diode on and off sys = System emperature averaged over bandwidth

Opacities from the various components Water Continuum Dry Air Continuum Oxygen Line Water Line Hydrosols

Opacities from the various components gfs3_c27_1190268000.buf otal Opacity

Determining Opacities SYS Rcvr Spillover CMB e A AM (1 e A ) Slope ~ AM

ypical Position-Switched Calibration Equation S( ) A ( ) Ref Sys 2k A (, Elev) Area Sig( ) Ref Ref ( ) Ref On ( ) Ref ( ) ( ) Ref Off p Ref Sys ( ) A Cal ( ) e ( ) (, t) A( Elev, t) BW A(Elev,t) = Air Mass τ(ν,t) = Atmospheric Zenith Opacity cal = Noise Diode emperature Area = Physical area of the telescope η A (ν,elev) =Aperture efficiency (point sources) A (ν) = Source Antenna emperature S(ν) = Source Flux Density Sig(ν), Ref (ν) = Data taken on source and on blank sky (in units backend counts) On,Off = Data taken with the noise diode on and off sys = System emperature averaged over bandwidth

Determining Cal from hot-cold load measurements in the lab Place black bodies (absorbers) of two known temperatures in front of the feed and record detected voltages. V Hot_Off = g * Hot V Cold_Off = g * Cold V Cold_On = g * ( Cold + Cal ) g and Cal are unknown

Determining Cal from hot-cold load measurements in the lab Course frequency resolution Uncertainties in load temperatures Are the absorbers black bodies? Detector linearities (300 & 75 K) Lab Cal may be off by 10% So all good observers perform their own astronomical calibration observation

Noise Diode Estimates Instead, we recommend an On-Off observation Use a point source with known flux -- polarization should be low or understood Use the same exact hardware, exact setup as your observation. (i.e., don t use your continuum pointing data to calibrate your line observations.) Observations take ~5 minutes per observing run Staff take about 2 hrs to measure the complete band of a high-frequency, multi-beam receiver. Resolution sufficient: 1 MHz, sometimes better Accuracy of ~ 1%, mostly systematics.

Noise Diode Estimates S ν η A 2k (, Elev) A p Sig( ) Ref Ref ( ) ( ) Ref On Ref ( ) ( ) Ref Off ( ) Cal ( ) e τ(ν) A Remove Averaging, Solve for cal Cal A, Elev Area Ref Ref 2k e p On Off S( ) ( ) A Sig Ref

CAL (K) CAL (K) Noise Diode Estimates 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 X-band Low Cals Right-Circular Polarization Legend Ast Eng 4.00 3.50 3.00 Legend Eng (21 Oct 2004) Eng (22 Oct 2004) Ast S-band Low Cals Y-Linear Polarization 2.00 2.50 1.50 2.00 1.00 0.50 1.50 0.00 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 Frequency (MHz) 1.00 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 Frequency (MHz) Created with PSI-Plot, ue May 10 14:36:23 2005 X_LC_Rcs.pgw Created with PSI-Plot, ue May 10 16:59:49 2005 S_LL_Ycs.pgw

ypical Position-Switched Calibration Equation S( ) A ( ) Ref Sys 2k A (, Elev) Area Sig( ) Ref Ref ( ) Ref On ( ) Ref ( ) ( ) Ref Off p Ref Sys ( ) A Cal ( ) e ( ) (, t) A( Elev, t) BW A(Elev,t) = Air Mass τ(ν,t) = Atmospheric Zenith Opacity cal = Noise Diode emperature Area = Physical area of the telescope η A (ν,elev) =Aperture efficiency (point sources) A (ν) = Source Antenna emperature S(ν) = Source Flux Density Sig(ν), Ref (ν) = Data taken on source and on blank sky (in units backend counts) On,Off = Data taken with the noise diode on and off sys = System emperature averaged over bandwidth

elescope efficiencies Part 1

GB Gain Curve Ruze Equation Surface errors

GB Gain Curve

Non-linearity If system is linear, P out = B * P in (Sig On -Sig Off ) (Ref On -Ref Off ) = 0 Model the response curve to 2 nd order: P out = B * P in + C * P in 2 Our On-Off observations of a calibrator provide: Four measured quantities: Ref off, Ref on, Sig off, Sig on A From catalog Four desired quantities: B, C, cal, sys It s easy to show that: C = [(Sig on - Sig off )-(Ref on - Ref off )]/(2 A cal ) hus: Can determine if system is sufficiently linear Can correct to 2 nd order if it is not

Non-linearity (SigOn-SigOff) (RefOn-RefOff )

Reference observations Difference a signal observation with a reference observation ypes of reference observations Frequency Switching In or Out-of-band Position Switching Beam Switching Move Subreflector Receiver beam-switch Dual-Beam Nodding Move telescope Move Subreflector

Position switching Move the telescope between a signal and reference position Overhead ½ time spent off source Difference the two spectra Assumes shape of gain/bandpass doesn t change between the two observations. For strong sources, must contend with dynamic range and linearity restrictions.

Frequency switching Eliminates bandpass shape from components after the mixer Leaves the derivative of the bandpass shape from components before the mixer.

In-Band Frequency Switching

Out-Of-Band Frequency Switching

Beam switching Internal switch Difference spectra eliminates any contributions to the bandpass from after the switch Residual will be the difference in bandpass shapes from all hardware in front of the switch. Low overhead but ½ time spent off source

Atmosphere is in the near field Common to all feeds in a multi-feed receiver

Beam Switching Subreflector or tertiary mirror Optical aberrations Difference in spillover/ground pickup Removes any fast gain/bandpass changes Low overhead. ½ time spent off source

Nodding with dual-beam receivers - elescope motion Optical aberrations Difference in spillover/ground pickup Removes any fast gain/bandpass changes Overhead from moving the telescope. All the time is spent on source

Nodding with dual-beam receivers - Subreflector or tertiary mirror Optical aberrations Difference in spillover/ground pickup Removes any fast gain/bandpass changes Low overhead. All the time is spent on source

References Rohlfs & Wilson, ools of Radio Astronomy Stanimrovis et al, Single-Dish Radio Astronomy: echniques and Practices Baars, 1973, IEEE rans Antennas Propagat, Vol AP-21, no. 4, pp 461-474 Kutner & Ulich, 1981, Astronomica Journal, Vol 250,pp 341-348 Winkel, Kraus, & Bach, 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 540.