Opto Engineering S.r.l.

Similar documents
APPLICATIONS FOR TELECENTRIC LIGHTING

Speed and Image Brightness uniformity of telecentric lenses

Performance Factors. Technical Assistance. Fundamental Optics

Imaging Optics Fundamentals

Telecentric lenses.

Chapters 1 & 2. Definitions and applications Conceptual basis of photogrammetric processing

Section 3. Imaging With A Thin Lens

OPTICAL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES

Exercises Advanced Optical Design Part 5 Solutions

Waves & Oscillations

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Using Optics to Optimize Your Machine Vision Application

Geometric optics & aberrations

Lecture 4: Geometrical Optics 2. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Rays. Wavefronts. Aberrations. Outline

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Lenses Design Basics. Introduction. RONAR-SMITH Laser Optics. Optics for Medical. System. Laser. Semiconductor Spectroscopy.

IMAGE SENSOR SOLUTIONS. KAC-96-1/5" Lens Kit. KODAK KAC-96-1/5" Lens Kit. for use with the KODAK CMOS Image Sensors. November 2004 Revision 2

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Lenses. Images. Difference between Real and Virtual Images

Using molded chalcogenide glass technology to reduce cost in a compact wide-angle thermal imaging lens

Laboratory experiment aberrations

ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2008

Point Spread Function. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Confocal Aperture. Optical aberrations. Alternative Scanning Microscopy

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

The optical analysis of the proposed Schmidt camera design.

Lenses- Worksheet. (Use a ray box to answer questions 3 to 7)

INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR THE MODEL C OPTICAL TESTER

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

Chapter 36. Image Formation

IMAGE FORMATION. Light source properties. Sensor characteristics Surface. Surface reflectance properties. Optics

Section 8. Objectives

Parallel Mode Confocal System for Wafer Bump Inspection

Lenses. A lens is any glass, plastic or transparent refractive medium with two opposite faces, and at least one of the faces must be curved.

VC 14/15 TP2 Image Formation

E X P E R I M E N T 12

Properties of Structured Light

Chapter 25. Optical Instruments

Chapter 34 Geometric Optics

Reflectors vs. Refractors

Opti 415/515. Introduction to Optical Systems. Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn

Vision. The eye. Image formation. Eye defects & corrective lenses. Visual acuity. Colour vision. Lecture 3.5

VC 11/12 T2 Image Formation

Laboratory 7: Properties of Lenses and Mirrors

Chapter 36. Image Formation

Section 2 concludes that a glare meter based on a digital camera is probably too expensive to develop and produce, and may not be simple in use.

LEICA Summarit-S 70 mm ASPH. f/2.5 / CS

Lab 11: Lenses and Ray Tracing

Chapter Ray and Wave Optics

Cardinal Points of an Optical System--and Other Basic Facts

Laser Telemetric System (Metrology)

PHY385H1F Introductory Optics. Practicals Session 7 Studying for Test 2

Tangents. The f-stops here. Shedding some light on the f-number. by Marcus R. Hatch and David E. Stoltzmann

Lecture Outline Chapter 27. Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Some of the important topics needed to be addressed in a successful lens design project (R.R. Shannon: The Art and Science of Optical Design)

COURSE NAME: PHOTOGRAPHY AND AUDIO VISUAL PRODUCTION (VOCATIONAL) FOR UNDER GRADUATE (FIRST YEAR)

Chapter 29/30. Wave Fronts and Rays. Refraction of Sound. Dispersion in a Prism. Index of Refraction. Refraction and Lenses

ME 297 L4-2 Optical design flow Analysis

The principles of CCTV design in VideoCAD

Introductions to aberrations OPTI 517

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Parity and Plane Mirrors. Invert Image flip about a horizontal line. Revert Image flip about a vertical line.

Optical Components - Scanning Lenses

Optical basics for machine vision systems. Lars Fermum Chief instructor STEMMER IMAGING GmbH

Systems Biology. Optical Train, Köhler Illumination

SUBJECT: PHYSICS. Use and Succeed.

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

This experiment is under development and thus we appreciate any and all comments as we design an interesting and achievable set of goals.

Exam Preparation Guide Geometrical optics (TN3313)

Optics Day 3 Kohler Illumination (Philbert Tsai July 2004) Goal : To build an bright-field microscope with a Kohler illumination pathway

Lens Design I Seminar 1

LENSES. INEL 6088 Computer Vision

Making Images with Lenses and Mirrors

Transmission Electron Microscopy 9. The Instrument. Outline

Big League Cryogenics and Vacuum The LHC at CERN

Very short introduction to light microscopy and digital imaging

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

CHAPTER 33 ABERRATION CURVES IN LENS DESIGN

PHYSICS 289 Experiment 8 Fall Geometric Optics II Thin Lenses

Smart vision and optical solutions for the food and beverage industry

NANO 703-Notes. Chapter 9-The Instrument

TECHSPEC COMPACT FIXED FOCAL LENGTH LENS

An Indian Journal FULL PAPER. Trade Science Inc. Parameters design of optical system in transmitive star simulator ABSTRACT KEYWORDS

Week IV: FIRST EXPERIMENTS WITH THE ADVANCED OPTICS SET

Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing

Design of a Lens System for a Structured Light Projector

Ch 24. Geometric Optics

Practice Problems (Geometrical Optics)

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

Tutorial Zemax Introduction 1

Be aware that there is no universal notation for the various quantities.

Geometric Optics. PSI AP Physics 2. Multiple-Choice

INTRODUCTION THIN LENSES. Introduction. given by the paraxial refraction equation derived last lecture: Thin lenses (19.1) = 1. Double-lens systems

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

Solutions: Lens Design I Part 2. Exercise 2-1: Apertures, stops and vignetting

Introduction. Strand F Unit 3: Optics. Learning Objectives. Introduction. At the end of this unit you should be able to;

PHYSICS. Chapter 35 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT

Experiment 1: Fraunhofer Diffraction of Light by a Single Slit

Optical design of a high resolution vision lens

Patents of eye tracking system- a survey

always positive for virtual image

Transcription:

TUTORIAL #1 Telecentric Lenses: basic information and working principles On line dimensional control is one of the most challenging and difficult applications of vision systems. On the other hand, besides image processing problems, several factors limit measurement accuracy and repeatability: a) magnification change with object position change b) distortion c) perspective errors d) image resolution loss along the field depth of non-bitelecentric lenses e) edge position uncertainty due to object border lighting geometry Telecentric lenses allow the impact of all these problems to be strongly reduced or even cancelled, for this reason being a must for all those developing measurement applications. Below we try to explain how telecentric lenses work and why the above effects are reduced or eliminated. A - No magnification change with object position In several situations the piece being inspected cannot be placed at a precisely determined distance from the lens: this is particularly true for on line applications where the pieces can be put in vibration or its thickness (therefore the object surface position) can be variable. Common lenses give a different magnification at different conjugates: as a consequence the image of the same object placed in different positions changes almost proportionally with object to lens distance, as everybody can easily experience with his vision system. Fig. 1: standard lenses generate images of different size if a same object changes its distance from the lens. On the other hand objects of different size can be viewed as if they had the same dimension, if they subtend the same viewing angle.

With telecentric lenses the image size remains almost unchanged when the object distance changes, provided the object to be inspected stays within the given field depth/telecentric range. This is due to the particular path of the rays within the optical system: the objective accepts form the object to be imaged only cones of rays whose barycentric ray (or principal ray) is parallel to the opto-mechanical main axis (for this reason the front lens diameter is at least as large as the object field diagonal). This is made possible because the stop aperture is placed at the focus of the front optical group: this causes the entrance pupil to be seen, by the rays coming into the optics, as if it would be placed at the infinity. For this reason these lenses are called telecentric, because the pupil aperture (the center of the optics), is virtually placed at infinity (tele-, far, from the Greek). Fig. 2: in a telecentric system rays get into the optics only with an almost parallel-to-the-axis path. Just to get the feeling of the difference between the two objective kinds, let suppose, for instance, a common lens of focal length f = 12 mm, interfaced to a 1/3 detector, looking at an object of height H = 20 mm, at a distance s = 200 mm. If the object is moved, from its original position, of δs = 1mm, the change of its dimension appear to be about: DH=(ds/s) H=(1/200) 20 mm = 0,1 mm In a telecentric lens the magnification change is determined by the telecentric slope: Fig. 3: the telecentric slope determines the magnification change

Good telecentric lenses show an effective telecentric slope of about 0,1 (0,0017 rad) as in the case of Opto Engineering s lenses; this means that the object dimension appear to change of only 0,0017 mm for each displacement δs of 1 mm. Thus, with telecentric lenses the magnification error is 1/10 to 1/100 in comparison with common lenses. B Distortion control Distortion is one of the worst problems limiting measurement precision, because all lenses suffer at least of a minimum distortion, and often even a single pixel of difference between the real image and the expected image is critical. Distortion is simply defined as the percentage difference between the distance from the image center of real image point and the distance that would be measured in complete absence of distortion. For instance, if the corner of the image of a square has a distance from the image center of 198 pixels, but a distance of 200 pixels would be expected in absence of distortion, the distortion, at that point, is Dist = (198-200)/200 = -2/200 = 1% Positive distortion is also called pincushion distortion, negative distortion is called barrel distortion: note that the distortion depends on the radial position and can even change of sign. Fig. 4: Pincushion and barrel distortion. On the right the graph of the distortion correction of a telecentric lens of Opto Engineering

Opto Engineering S.r.l. Common optics present distortion values ranging from some percent to some tenth percent, making precise measurement really difficult, also because the correction of the distortion is complicated by the absence of telecentricity. The presence of distortion is due to the fact that the human eye can easily compensate a distortion of 1, 2% and, as most of the optics used in machine vision has been developed for video-surveillance or photography, this is enough. In some cases, like in fish eye lenses or web-cam style lenses, distortion is expressly introduced to help the lens to work on large angles and to guarantee an eve illumination of the detector. Telecentric lenses normally show a very low distortion degree, in the range of 0,1%: this means that the maximum error due to distortion should be less than a pixel of a highresolution camera (0,6 pixels on the semi-diagonal of a VGA). Few people know that the distortion depends upon the distance of the object, not only upon the optics itself. For this reason it is very important that the nominal working distance be maintained and no focusing optical groups be present in the lens. In any case, in many situations distortion has to be calibrated: a known pattern must be placed at the center of the field depth, the distortion must be measured in several image points and some algorithm must interpret the grabbed frame and to transform it into a distortion free image. To avoid non-axially symmetric distortion care has to be taken to provide a fine perpendicular alignment of the optics and the object to be inspected. C- Perspective errors limitation When common optics are used to image 3D objects, as was said above, far objects have smaller images than close objects. As a consequence, when an object like, for instance, a cylindrical cavity is imaged, the top and the bottom circular edges seem to be concentric even if the two circles are perfectly identical. On the contrary by means of a telecentric lens, the bottom edge disappears because the top standing circular edge covers it. Fig. 5: Perspective error due to common optics (left image) and perspective error absence (right image) with a telecentric lens.

This effect is due to the specific path of the rays: in the case of common optics the geometric information parallel to the main optical axis shows a component on the detector plane direction, while in a telecentric lens this perpendicular component is not present at all. You can think as if common lenses would build a correspondence between the 3-dimensional object space and the 2-dimensional detector (image) space: in the case of a telecentric lens the third dimension in object space is left out. Fig. 6: Common optics (left) project longitudinal geometrical information onto the detector, while telecentric lenses D- Good image resolution maintenance along the field depth Filed depth basically depends upon the optics F-number: the largest the f-number (that is the smaller the optics aperture) the larger the field depth, with a quasi-linear dependence. This happens because field depth is the maximum object position departure accepted from the best focus situation. Behind this limit the image resolution isn t any more accepted, because the rays coming from an object point don t strike the detector surface in a sufficiently small spot, more pixel are interested by the same object information (blur) and the focusing becomes bad. Closing the lens diaphragm, that is raising the f-number - that simply is the ratio between the lens focal length and its apparent pupil aperture diminishes rays divergence; the rays spread is consequently lower, allowing a smaller spot size onto the detector. Common optics and normal telecentric lenses tend to have a worse behavior because the ray cones have different inclinations depending upon the field position. As a consequence of this, the spot generated by the intercept between the ray cone and the detector plane has a different shape and dimension at the image center and at the image borders (becomes elliptic and larger). In addition the spot barycentric point moves back and forth with image plane position. For this reason non bi-telecentric lenses have a poor field depth and a poor telecentricity!!!

Fig. 7: In a bi-telecentric lens (right) the ray cones intercept the image sensor in a way independent on the field position, in a non image space telecentric lens (left) this doesn t happen. E - Edge position certain determination and border effects limitation Very often back lighting the subject makes difficult to determine the exact position of the object edge. This can happen because the signal of the bright pixels of the background tends to be overlapped to that of the dark pixels of the object edges, but if the object is highly 3D, another effect can strongly effect the measurement precision. As shown in figure 8, rays coming from the peripheral zones of the object, being close to the object edges can be reflected by the object (almost any material approach a mirror if the incidence angle is large) and can be interpreted as rays directly coming from the back of the object. This means that some marginal slices of the object can disappear making the measurement really imprecise and unstable. Fig. 8: Border effects in a common imaging lens are strongly reduced by means of a telecentric lens This effect can be efficiently limited if a telecentric lens is adopted, because, if the f-number is not to open, the only rays that can be reflected by the object surface and come into the optics are those parallel or almost parallel to the optical main axis (that are, thus effected by really very small deflections), that doesn t compromise too much the measurement.

To completely avoid this kind of problem Opto Engineering produces telecentric illuminators to be interfaced to telecentric lenses with the same aperture and full object field compatibility. In this way ALL the light coming out from the illuminator goes onto the detector, allowing extremely high signal to noise performances and incredibly low exposure time. On the other hand, the only rays coming into the imaging lens are those that are expected to and no border problems occur Fig. 9: Collimated or telecentric illumination projects into the imaging telecentric lens only the rays expected to. OPTO ENGINEERING srl via Cremona, 28 46100 MANTOVA tel. +39 (0)376 229585 fax +39 (0)376 229829