Integration of 3D detector systems

Similar documents
Jan Bogaerts imec

IMAGE SENSOR EVOLUTION AND ENABLING 3D TECHNOLOGIES

450mm and Moore s Law Advanced Packaging Challenges and the Impact of 3D

Simulation of High Resistivity (CMOS) Pixels

Lecture: Integration of silicon photonics with electronics. Prepared by Jean-Marc FEDELI CEA-LETI

Min Tao, Ph. D, Ashok Prabhu, Akash Agrawal, Ilyas Mohammed, Ph. D, Bel Haba, Ph. D Oct , IWLPC

Fraunhofer IZM - ASSID

High Resolution 640 x um Pitch InSb Detector

64 Channel Flip-Chip Mounted Selectively Oxidized GaAs VCSEL Array

EMERGING SUBSTRATE TECHNOLOGIES FOR PACKAGING

3D ICs: Recent Advances in the Industry

Optical Characterization and Defect Inspection for 3D Stacked IC Technology

Extended backside-illuminated InGaAs on GaAs IR detectors

50 Micron Pitch Flip Chip Bumping Technology: Processes and Applications

SOLDER BUMP FLIP CHIP BONDING FOR PIXEL DETECTOR HYBRIDIZATION

Fundamentals of CMOS Image Sensors

Through Glass Via (TGV) Technology for RF Applications

The Future of Packaging ~ Advanced System Integration

Flip chip Assembly with Sub-micron 3D Re-alignment via Solder Surface Tension

New fabrication and packaging technologies for CMOS pixel sensors: closing gap between hybrid and monolithic

EVALUATION OF RADIATION HARDNESS DESIGN TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE RADIATION TOLERANCE FOR CMOS IMAGE SENSORS DEDICATED TO SPACE APPLICATIONS

Smart Vision Chip Fabricated Using Three Dimensional Integration Technology

More Imaging Luc De Mey - CEO - CMOSIS SA

Market and technology trends in advanced packaging

3D TSV Micro Cu Column Chip-to-Substrate/Chip Assmbly/Packaging Technology

A Miniaturized Multi-Channel TR Module Design Based on Silicon Substrate

Flexible Hybrid Electronics Fabricated with High-Performance COTS ICs using RTI CircuitFilm TM Technology

Product Catalog. Semiconductor Intellectual Property & Technology Licensing Program

Strip Detectors. Principal: Silicon strip detector. Ingrid--MariaGregor,SemiconductorsasParticleDetectors. metallization (Al) p +--strips

!"#$"%&' ()#*+,-+.&/0(

TSV MEOL (Mid-End-Of-Line) and its Assembly/Packaging Technology for 3D/2.5D Solutions

Integration of Optoelectronic and RF Devices for Applications in Optical Interconnect and Wireless Communication

POSSUM TM Die Design as a Low Cost 3D Packaging Alternative

TechSearch International, Inc. Corporate Overview E. Jan Vardaman, President

Detectors that cover a dynamic range of more than 1 million in several dimensions

CMP for More Than Moore

New Approaches to Develop a Scalable 3D IC Assembly Method

Packaging Roadmap: The impact of miniaturization. Bob Pfahl, inemi Celestica-iNEMI Technology Forum May 15, 2007

FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR CMOS ACTIVE PIXEL SENSORS

NEW PACKAGING AND INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES FOR ULTRA THIN CHIPS

New Wave SiP solution for Power

PROJECT. DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION D2.2 - Report on low cost filter deposition process DISSEMINATION STATUS PUBLIC DUE DATE 30/09/2011 ISSUE 2 PAGES 16

High-end CMOS Active Pixel Sensor for Hyperspectral Imaging

SAMPLE SLIDES & COURSE OUTLINE. Core Competency In Semiconductor Technology: 2. FABRICATION. Dr. Theodore (Ted) Dellin

MID Manufacturing Process.

Si and InP Integration in the HELIOS project

Silicon Photonics Technology Platform To Advance The Development Of Optical Interconnects

GaN-based Schottky diodes for EUV/VUV/UV photodetection

Lecture Notes 5 CMOS Image Sensor Device and Fabrication

Signal Integrity Design of TSV-Based 3D IC

MEMS in ECE at CMU. Gary K. Fedder

Advances in X-Ray Technology for Semicon Applications Keith Bryant and Thorsten Rother

Silicon Interposers enable high performance capacitors

The Role of Flip Chip Bonding in Advanced Packaging David Pedder

Chapter 7 Introduction to 3D Integration Technology using TSV

Muon detection in security applications and monolithic active pixel sensors

Aptina MT9P111 5 Megapixel, 1/4 Inch Optical Format, System-on-Chip (SoC) CMOS Image Sensor

A Low-cost Through Via Interconnection for ISM WLP

Sony IMX018 CMOS Image Sensor Imager Process Review

Enabling concepts: Packaging Technologies

450mm patterning out of darkness Backend Process Exposure Tool SOKUDO Lithography Breakfast Forum July 10, 2013 Doug Shelton Canon USA Inc.

Design and Performance of a Pinned Photodiode CMOS Image Sensor Using Reverse Substrate Bias

Silicon sensors for radiant signals. D.Sc. Mikko A. Juntunen

IMAPS NE 45 A HETEROGENEOUS SIP SOLUTION FOR RF APPLICATIONS

SiP packaging technology of intelligent sensor module. Tony li

Introduction of IMS Technology for Advanced Solder Bumping on Wafers / Laminates

Wafer Level System Integration. Oswin Ehrmann

Technology development for a flexible, low-cost backplane for lighting applications

Based on lectures by Bernhard Brandl

Lecture 4 INTEGRATED PHOTONICS

Fabricating 2.5D, 3D, 5.5D Devices

The 3D Silicon Leader

Marten Bosma 1, Alex Fauler 2, Michael Fiederle 2 en Jan Visser Nikhef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2. FMF, Freiburg, Germany

Advanced High-Density Interconnection Technology

ABSTRACT. Keywords: 0,18 micron, CMOS, APS, Sunsensor, Microned, TNO, TU-Delft, Radiation tolerant, Low noise. 1. IMAGERS FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS.

Micro-sensors - what happens when you make "classical" devices "small": MEMS devices and integrated bolometric IR detectors

X-ray Detectors: What are the Needs?

Modeling, Design, and Demonstration of 2.5D Glass Interposers for 16-Channel 28 Gbps Signaling Applications

9 rue Alfred Kastler - BP Nantes Cedex 3 - France Phone : +33 (0) website :

CMP for Advanced Packaging

3D Integration developments & manufacturing CEA-LETI. D. Henry CEA-Leti-Minatec

Thin Film Resistor Integration into Flex-Boards

Chromatic X-Ray imaging with a fine pitch CdTe sensor coupled to a large area photon counting pixel ASIC

First Demonstration of Panel Glass Fan-out (GFO) Packages for High I/O Density and High Frequency Multi-Chip Integration

Challenges in Imaging, Sensors, and Signal Processing

Processes for Flexible Electronic Systems

Innovative pcb solutions used in medical and other devices Made in Switzerland

Heinrich-Hertz-Institut Berlin

Image sensor combining the best of different worlds

Sony IMX Megapixel, 1.4 µm Pixel 1/3.2 Optical Format CMOS Image Sensor

Electronic-Photonic ICs for Low Cost and Scalable Datacenter Solutions

True Three-Dimensional Interconnections

Monolithic Pixel Detector in a 0.15µm SOI Technology

2.5D Platform (Examples of products produced to date are shown here to demonstrate Amkor's production capabilities)

Active Pixel Sensors Fabricated in a Standard 0.18 um CMOS Technology

Substrates Lost in Translation

Detection Beyond 100µm Photon detectors no longer work ("shallow", i.e. low excitation energy, impurities only go out to equivalent of

Sectional Design Standard for High Density Interconnect (HDI) Printed Boards

Copyright 2008 Year IEEE. Reprinted from IEEE ECTC May 2008, Florida USA.. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE.

Copyright 2000 Society of Photo Instrumentation Engineers.

Transcription:

Integration of 3D detector systems Piet De Moor Introduction Evolution in radiation detection/imaging: single pixel linear array 2D array increase in resolution = decrease in pitch (down to few um) = thanks to development in microelectronics fabrication technology: CMOS scaling hybridisation using solder bumps Question: what s next? which new technologies become available? what are the benefits? Answer: advanced packaging including flex and/or 3D integration imec 2008 2 1

Overview Introduction Technology enablers: Thinning Assembly Bumping 3D integration: 3D- System-in-Package (3D-SiP) 3D- Wafer-Level-Packaging (3D-WLP): die stacking thin chip embedding 3D- Stacked-IC (3D-SiC) Analog ROIC design Detector systems examples Conclusions & outlook imec 2008 3 Technology enablers: Wafer thinning Technology: rough/fine grinding, dry/wet etch Si, glass, GaAs, critical: thinning damage, impact on devices very thin wafers (< 100 um): use of carrier wafers and temporary (de-)bonding technology Features: thinning down to 15 um total thickness variation < 1 um Applications: 3D stacking, enabling through Si interconnects ultra thin chip embedding thin substrates: backside illuminated imagers, ΔE detectors, imec 2008 4 2

Technology enablers: Assembly Assembly at: PCB or package level (thin) wafer level (thin) die level Using: Solder (temporary) dielectric Multiple layers/components: Embedding in flex Die stacking, e.g. using interposer die imec 2008 5 Technology enablers: (Micro-)bumping Technology: (post-)processing Si, CMOS under bump metallization (UBM) solder (e.g. In, Sn, ) deposition using electroplating or evaporation flip-chip bumping Ev. intermetallic compound formation allowing multiple staking Features: bump size ~ 10 um pitch ~ 20 um 1 Mpixel 2D arrays Applications: hybrid interconnect between substrates of different technologies with low parasitics/microphonics high density interconnect between imagers and ROIC Si Si M IMC M UBM M Solder - IMC UBM M 200 um imec 2008 6 3

Technology enablers: Self-assembly part fluid lubricant substrate Approaching Energy minimization Self-alignment Capillary self-assembly Advantages: Parallel process = fast Auto-alignement = sub-micron accuracy LOW COST Challenge: Electrical interconnect imec 2008 7 Technology enablers: 3D micro-fluidics 200mm wafer Pillars in separation channels 1 1 4 23 6 5 Symbol 10 27 to 30 31 48 47 45 49 50Symbol 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 50 4946 Supply channels Through wafer holes glass Si Liquid phase chromatograph Deniz S. Tezcan et al., IEDM 2007 imec 2008 8 4

3D-SIP approach: Traditional packaging & interconnection Stacking of 2D-SIP sub-systems each layer is an SIP PCB different assembly technologies can be used interconnect density: 2-3/mm, 4-11/mm 2 Advantages: generic 3D technology each layer is fully tested before final assembly best yield and manufacturability Limitations : relatively low 3D interconnectivity lack of standardization of package sizes Application: intelligent/autonomous wireless sensor nodes miniaturized detector systems IRIS-2 CMOS camera imec 2008 9 3D SiP: Example: embedded components Technology: embedding of a thin dies and/or components by lamination or overmolding materials: PCB, Polyimide and Silicone interconnects made using PCB technololgy Limitations: Interconnect density Applications: Thin flexible & stretchable systems Medical applications imec 2008 10 5

3D-WLP approach: Wafer-level-packaging technology 3D interconnects: realized at wafer level Post-processing on fully processed wafers Interconnect density: 10-50/mm, 100 2.5k/mm 2 Advantages: no interference with process of individual layers Limitations: not the highest interconnect density 2 technology approaches: die stacking ultra thin chip embedding Applications: 3D sensor/imager systems allowing tiling/full buttability thin flexible/stretchable systems imec 2008 11 3D-WLP approach: Via 1 Through wafer via: pitch: 100-150 um diameter: 50-100 um Wafer thickness: 50-100 um resistance <= bond wire resistance 200 um 3D-WLP via 1mm wirebond R 20-30mO 20-30mΩ ~40mO ~40mΩ (25µm wire) 100 um D. Sabuncuoglu et al., ECTC 2007 imec 2008 12 6

3D-WLP approach: Via 2 40µm Front-end 50µm thick Cu fill Polymer ~5µm Back-end Via diameter 25µm landing pad New via process: Smaller pitch Better scalability imec 2008 13 3D-WLP: Ultra Thin Chip Embedding Approach: ultra thin 10 to 20 µm thick die embedded in a multilayer thin film build-up Advantages: allows different die size flexible applications IC2 IC3 IC1 Si Dielectric layer Interconnect line (Cu) imec 2008 14 7

3D-WLP: Ultra Thin Chip Embedding UTCS example: 20µm thin Si-die, 40µm pad pitch connections imec 2008 15 3D-WLP: Ultra Thin Chip Embedding: Flexible electronic systems Technology: thin chip embedding on sacrificial layer release of sacrificial layer: chipin-flex M. Vanden Bulcke et al., IEEE-EMBC 2006 Result: flexible/stretchable embedded electronics using e.g. Silicone dielectric Applications: medical chip-in-wire 500 µm imec 2008 16 8

3D-SiC approach: Introduction Technology: fabrication at device level, i.e. as a part of (CMOS) flow Specifications: Si thickness: 10 20 um via diameter: 3 5 um via pitch: 10 um Applications: CMOS/memory/imager stacking Cu-Cu bond BEOL thin Si (20 µm) IC3 Dielectric glue BEOL thin Si (20 µm) IC2 BEOL thick Si IC1 imec 2008 17 3D-SiC approach: Results Through Si vias: Pitch 10 micron, via diameter: 5 micron Trough die Cu via 5 um Thinned and stacked die: 16.9 µm B. Swinnen et al., IEDM 2006 Stand-off gap: 722nm imec 2008 18 9

3D-SiC approach: Results 10000 Cu vias in series yielding linear I-V curve via resistance ~ 30 mohm 4-layer demonstrator realized Resistance (Ohm) 10000 1000 100 10 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.1 # of vias Carrier die 3 rd stacked die 2 nd stacked die 1 st stacked die Landing die imec 2008 19 IMEC s 3D Interconnect R&D Roadmap 3D interconnect complexity 3D-SIC 3D-WLP Face-to-face Flip-chip Stacked-IC Package Ultra Thin Chip embedding 2-layer UTCS Face-to-face Micro-bumps 3D-SIP BGA 3D-SIC 2-layer Chip-in-Flex UTCF 3D-WLP 2-layer Through-Si 3D-SIP CSP 3D-SIP 3D-SIC n-layer n-layer UTCS 3D-WLP n-layer 3DSIP Die-in-board n-layer UTCS 3D-SIC 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 n-layer UTCS 3D-WLP imec 2008 20 10

Positioning different 3D approaches 3D-SIP 3D-WLP 3D-SIC Technology Package interposer WLP, Post-passivation Si-foundry, Post FEOL 3D interconnect Package I/O UTCS Embedded die Si-through vias Si-through Cu nail vias Intercon. Density Peripheral package-topackage 2-3 /mm around die 10-50 /mm through die 10-25 /mm through die 25-100 /mm Area-array 4-11/mm 2 100-2.5k/mm 2 16-100/mm 2 400-10k/mm 2 3D Si Via pitch - - 40 100 µm < 10 µm 3D interconnect pitch 300 500 µm 20 100 µm - - 3D Si Via diameter - - 25-100 µm 1-5 µm Die thickness > 50 µm 10-20 µm 50-100 µm 10-20 µm imec 2008 21 Enablers: Custom analog design: radiation tolerant Radiation-tolerant analog ROIC design: nmos pixel design (using 0.7μm Alcatel Microelectronics Technology) 2-3 orders of magnitude less sensitive to total dose Example: Flight Model IRIS3 CMOS camera for imaging in space 1500 standard pixel continuous reset Focal plane Logic ADC dark current [ mv/s] 1000 500 dose rate: 350 Gy(Si)/h pulsed reset 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Piet De Moor, Total Integration Ionising Dose of [kgy(si)] 3D detector systems imec 2008 22 11

Enablers: Custom analog design: cryogenic ROICs Analog design for 4 Kelvin operation: special design to avoid anomalous behavior of standard CMOS < 20 K Example: PACS-CRE: ROIC for a far-infrared detector array ~ 200 qualified assemblies delivered to ESA Herschel satellite to be launched in 2008 very low noise: measures 10 fa 100 pa very low power consumption: 80 μw irradiation tolerant @ 4 K FEE frontside Micro connector Harness wires AWG 36 Nano connector Bridging substrates Mounting posts (Kapton) Detector AWG 40 wire channels imec 2008 23 Enablers: Custom analog design: CryoADC Successive Approximation ADC at Cryogenic T: 8 bit resolution implemented in 0.7μm AMIS CMOS 350 uw power consumption Experiments show minor temperature dependance Aim: maintain signal integrity 4K room temperature SAR Capacitor Bank CTA and Comparator Y. Creten et al., ISSCC, 2007 imec 2008 24 12

Overview Introduction Technology enablers Detector systems examples: BIB: far IR Hybrid APS: VIS Bold: UV RelaxD: X-ray Conclusions & outlook imec 2008 25 Detector systems: Cryogenic BIB detector Far IR detection: 6 18 um wavelength Si:As Blocked Impurity Band (BIB) detector array operating at 4 K Backside illuminated through high resistivity Si Contact layer: N d =10 19 cm -3 N a = ------------- Blocking layer: N d = 5.10 12 cm -3 N a = 3.10 12 cm -3 BIB Detector Absorbing layer: N d = 5.10 17 cm -3 N a = 5.10 12 cm -3 Hybridization on cryogenic ROIC using In bumps Readout Chip imec 2008 26 13

Detector systems: Cryogenic BIB detector Linear array: 2x 88 pixels Pitch: 30 um Application: DARWIN mission: search for exoplanets imec 2008 27 Detector systems: Backside illuminated CMOS imager Specifications: 22.5 um pitch hybrid assembly 1 4 Mpixel thinned down to +/- 35 um In bump yield ~ 99.95 % diode array 50 um ROIC K. De Munck et al., IEDM 2006 hybrid diode array ROIC imec 2008 28 14

Detector systems: Backside illuminated CMOS imager Excellent QE due to ARC and very shallow backside passivation: Quantum efficiency [%] > 80 % from 400 850 nm wavelength 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 nm 0 nm 10 nm 15 nm simulation: ARC + implant 15 nm 0 nm 10 nm 15 nm dead layer thickness simulation: plain Si simulation: ARC limited measurement 10 0 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 Wavelength [nm] imec 2008 29 Detector systems: Backside illuminated CMOS imager Trenches along pixel boundaries Doped poly-si filled trenches >1e19 at/cm 3 zero cross-talk In In In In 22.5 µm n p Built-in electric fields Al UBM W n+ n- UBM Al W p+ Al UBM W n+ n- UBM Al W p+ p+ P-Si pixel p+ P-Si substrate contact p+ P-Si pixel p+ P-Si substrate contact neutral density filter assembly 1 0.9 1 collimator HeNe laser 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1 2 3 S1 S2 S3 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1 2 3 S1 S2 S3 low power beam 60x microscope objective x-y-z translation stage imager Ref.: K. Minoglou et al., IITC 2008 imec 2008 30 15

Detector systems: BOLD: 2D (X)UV detection P372 GaN Schottky photodiode 1000 Spectral responsivity [m A/W] 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Responsivity 185 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 370 380 390 400 Wavelength [nm] AlN ngan igan ROIC Application: solar activity observation Large gap AlGaN Schottky or MSM diode detector Advantage over Si technology: intrinsically solar blind Backside illumination approach using wafer thinning, thin layer transfer, through Si optical access holes Hybridisation on 2D ROIC with 10 um pitch imec 2008 31 Detector systems: RelaxD: tilable X-ray imagers Application: large area X-ray detection for XRD by tiling of imager modules Using Si X-ray detectors (Canberra) hybridized on Medipix ROICS (CERN) Issue: dead area and hence loss of information at imager boundary due to: wiring at > 1 side Solution: Vertical electrical interconnections using 3D integration by using TSVs 2D X-ray detector X-ray detector Medipix ROIC PCB board Medipix ROIC PCB board imec 2008 32 16

Detector systems: RelaxD: tilable X-ray imagers Issue: bad pixels at imager boundary due to damage by dicing Solution: edgeless detector concept: (bad) pixel (bad) pixel pixel Replace dicing by trench etching and proper passivation pixel trench pixel pixel passivation Result: fully tilable X-ray imaging with minimal dead area imec 2008 33 Conclusions & outlook I 3D integration technology is developing fast It will allow manufacturing of advanced detection systems: highly miniaturized, i.e. very small in vertical dimension tilable, i.e. enabling large area detection with minimal nonsensitive area very thin, e.g. flexible detector systems, for e.g. non-planar 4π detection, ΔE detectors imec 2008 34 17

Conclusions & outlook II 3D integration technology will allow manufacturing of advanced detection systems: complex imaging detectors using high density 3D interconnects ( 1 per pixel) between different intelligent layers: detection layer analog ROIC digital signal processing memory output drivers Economical aspects: (large) commercial foundries will offer 3D in (near) future But: typically large volume Solution: IMEC prototyping/small scale production CMORE imec 2008 35 imec 2008 36 18