Models and Mechanisms for the Management of ICT-Technoparks

Similar documents
Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Economics and Finance 24 ( 2015 )

IMPROVING THE TECHNOLOGY OF INNOVATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AT AN ENTERPRISE

FORMING OF CONDITIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY OF ENTERPRISES IN HIGH- TECH INDUSTRIES OF ECONOMY: A CASE OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS

Сonceptual framework and toolbox for digital transformation of industry of the Eurasian Economic Union

National Innovation System of Mongolia

DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE, TECNOLOGY, AND INNOVATION IN UKRAINE Oleg Khymenko

AC : THE NATIONAL PROJECT FOR THE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIGHER ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN RUSSIA

Opportunities and Challenges for Open Innovation

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

Problems and Prospects of the Development of Import Substitution in Pharmaceutical Industry of the Russian Federation

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

R&D and innovation activities in companies across Global Value Chains

Urban and Regional Innovation

Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics Faculty of Trade and Marketing INFORMATION PACKAGE

IP and Technology Management for Universities

Commission on science and Technology for Development. Ninth Session Geneva, May2006

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND MARKETING

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

Main lessons learned from the German national innovation system

Providing innovational activity of enterprises of the real sector of the economy

Co-funded by the I Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union

Economic Sectors Development Evaluation in Innovations Triple- Helix Model

University IP and Technology Management. University IP and Technology Management

WIPO-WASME Program on Practical Intellectual Property Rights Issues for Entrepreneurs, Economists, Bankers, Lawyers and Accountants

Innovation Ecosystem of Kazakhstan. Astana, 2017

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

GROWTH OF THE RUSSIAN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES EFFICIENCY AT TRANSFORMATION OF NATIONAL INNOVATIVE SYSTEM

Strategic Management of Innovative Development of the Russian Pharmaceutical Complex

THE INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION THE UNTAPPED POTENTIAL: A CHALLENGE FOR BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT BELARUS

The Strategy of Promoting Born - Global and High- Growth SMEs

Learning Lessons Abroad on Funding Research and Innovation. 29 April 2016

Research on Influence Factors of Synergy of Enterprise Technological Innovation and Business Model Innovation in Strategic Emerging Industry Hui Zhang

Innovative Development of Building Materials Industry of the Region Based on the Cluster Approach

Innovative Susceptibility in the Regional Innovation System

Analysis of the influence of external environmental factors on the development of high-tech enterprises

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

Innovative methods of industrial enterprises management based on the universal network model

Venera Vagizova. Marina Lebedeva

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

46 Kostyukov Street, Belgorod , Russian Federation. Received on Accepted on

Higher School of Economics, Vienna

High Level Seminar on the Creative Economy and Copyright as Pathways to Sustainable Development. UN-ESCAP/ WIPO, Bangkok December 6, 2017

Introduction to HSE ISSEK

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

An exploration of the future Latin America and Caribbean (ALC) and European Union (UE) bi-regional cooperation in science, technology and innovation

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Research on Agricultural Technology Management Mechanism of Universities and Construction of Social Service Platform Wen LIAN

Competence Model and Modern Trends of Development of the Russian Institute of Technical Customer

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER II DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION

The Enlightenment of Israeli Innovation-driven Experience to the Economic Development of Suzhou

Municipality of Tirana. General Directorate For Strategic Project & Foreign Investments. Strategic Projects Directorate.

OECD-INADEM Workshop on

Building an enterprise-centred innovation system

Concept of Technoparks in Tunisia

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

Russian S&T Foresight 2030: Methodology, Structure, Place in S&T Policy

Interim Report on the Heiligendamm Process at the G8 Summit in Hokkaido Toyako 7 to 9 July 2008

FINLAND. The use of different types of policy instruments; and/or Attention or support given to particular S&T policy areas.

Innovation Management Framework in Academic Institutions

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

OECD Innovation Strategy: Key Findings

Country Profile: Israel

Rosatom Approach to IPR Management in Collaborative Projects on Innovations

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

)XWXUH FKDOOHQJHV IRU WKH WRXULVP VHFWRU

CHAPTER TWENTY COOPERATION. The objective of this Chapter is to facilitate the establishment of close cooperation aimed, inter alia, at:

OPEN INNOVATION AS A STRATEGIC MODEL OF MODERN BUSINESS

INTERIM EVALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR LARGE RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

SCIENCE-INDUSTRY COOPERATION: THE ISSUES OF PATENTING AND COMMERCIALIZATION

University Technology Transfer, Innovation Ecosystem and EIE Project

Innovation, Inequality, and the Commercialization of Academic Research

Theoretical Framework of Agricultural Scientific and Technological Competitiveness. Kun Du

Methodological Basis for the Formation of the Cluster Model to the Regional Economic Development

The Model of Infrastructural Support of Regional Innovative Development

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

DELIVERABLE SEPE Exploitation Plan

Construction and Operation Mode Research of Regional Public R & D Platform

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Formation of Knowledge Economy in Russia

Technology Transfer in Germany - Status Quo and Recent Trends

Innovation Management & Technology Transfer Innovation Management & Technology Transfer

Framework conditions, innovation policies and instruments: Lessons Learned

SMART CITIES Presentation

EX-ANTE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR LARGE RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

Innovation Clusters: Advantages and Disadvantages

Dynamics of National Systems of Innovation in Developing Countries and Transition Economies. Jean-Luc Bernard UNIDO Representative in Iran

Kazakhstan Way of Innovation Clusterization K. Mukhtarova Al-Farabi Kazak National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Canada s Intellectual Property (IP) Strategy submission from Polytechnics Canada

SMALL BUSINESS IN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA

RECOMMENDATIONS LDAC CONFERENCE ON EXTERNAL DIMENSION OF THE CFP LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA, September 2015

BASED ECONOMIES. Nicholas S. Vonortas

THEORY AND PRACTICE OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATION RELEVANT TO INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH SCHOOL

Web-site: SOCHI SMART CITY. Grigory Bochechka Head of Innovation center department JSC «NIITC» Moscow, 2019

Vietnam s Innovation System: Toward a Product Innovation Ecosystem.

ClusterNanoRoad

Research Development Request - Profile Template. European Commission

COLLABORATIVE R&D & IP ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

SPECIFIC OF ECONOMIC SECURITY SME IN THE TOURISM SECTOR

REGIONAL WORKSHOP THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) AND THE VALORISATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Franco German press release. following the interview between Ministers Le Maire and Altmaier, 18 December.

Transcription:

Science Journal of Business and Management 2016; 4(6): 199-203 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/sjbm doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20160406.14 ISSN: 2331-0626 (Print); ISSN: 2331-0634 (Online) Review Article Models and Mechanisms for the Management of Rasim Mahammad Alguliyev, Alovsat Garaja Aliyev *, Roza Ordukhan Shahverdiyeva Institute of Information Technology of ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan Email address: director@iit.ab.az (R. M. Alguliyev), alovsat_qaraca@mail.ru (A. G. Aliyev), shahverdiyevar@gmail.com (R. O. Shahverdiyeva) * Corresponding author To cite this article: Rasim Mahammad Alguliyev, Alovsat Garaja Aliyev, Roza Ordukhan Shahverdiyeva. Models and Mechanisms for the Management of ICT- Technoparks. Science Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 4, No. 6, 2016, pp. 199-203. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20160406.14 Received: October 19, 2016; Accepted: November 1, 2016; Published: December 16, 2016 Abstract: The paper shows that the innovative development of economy requires improvement and systematization of management processes. And innovation is activated using modern forms of organization, application and commercialization of high technology through integration of science, education, manufacturing, business and government. These processes are jointly carried out by innovative structures. In this regard, the paper describes the control features of ICT-technoparks, which have interacting structural elements. The paper specifies imperfection of the current control systems of innovative organizations. Therefore, different approaches are given to the definition of the management content. It is proved that the problem of increasing the efficiency of the management process requires the development of complex control system of ICTtechnoparks. The paper specifies the basic management levels of ICT-technoparks, and presents its tasks and functions, as well as the main activities of executive management of ICT-technoparks. The paper describes the basic model and business management model. Depending on the time factor, the strategic and tactical control aspects of ICT-technoparks are analyzed. As the management of ICT-technoparks is viewed as a complex socio-economic system, the public and collegial governance mechanisms are proposed. It is proposed to develop a control system of ICT-technoparks and an appropriate control mechanisms. These mechanisms take into account the key moments in the development process of innovative control system of ICT-technoparks. Keywords: Innovative System,, High Technologies, Technopark Management, Controlling of a Technopark, Managing Companies of a Technoparks 1. Introduction Transition to innovative economy requires improvement and systematization of management processes, establishment of reasonable and long-term relationships between participants of the innovation process. Conducted studies show that innovation is activated using modern forms of development organization, application and commercialization of high technology by integrating science, education, manufacturing, business and government [1]. These processes are carried out jointly by innovative structures. Currently, such innovative structures are technology parks, techno-poleis, technology centers, etc. and organization of their activities also requires the development of effective management mechanisms. 2. Purpose and Content of İCT-technopark is a term for an organization, which has ties with universities or research centers of industrial, regional and local authorities and administration, and implementing formation of the modern innovation environment on their territory in order to support innovative entrepreneurship by creating logistical, social-cultural,

200 Rasim Mahammad Alguliyev et al.: Models and Mechanisms for the Management of service, financial and other bases for the effective formation, development, support and training for independent activity of small and medium-sized innovative enterprises, commercial mastering of scientific knowledge, inventions, know-how and science-based technologies and their transfer to the market of scientific-technical manufacturing [2,16]. İCT-technoparks in the high-tech enterprise combine the enterprises of high-technological branches of the economy, including sectors of nano-, bio-, information and other technologies, scientific organizations, educational institutions, providing scientific and personnel potential of such enterprises, as well as other enterprises and organizations whose activities are technologically associated with the organizations of identified branched or organizations focused on their service [3, 4]. ICT-technopark is defined as a form of organization of scientific institutions, design offices, educational institutions, organizations of innovation infrastructure, manufacturing companies or their divisions, which are compactly located in an isolated area. ICT-technoparks have following interactive elements such as [4]: 1) government organizations and enterprises, 2)private organizations and businesses, and 3)universities and academic institutions. These structures have different capabilities. It is known that the state organizations and enterprises have significant financial resources and large administrative resources. In particular, the latest technology platforms can be created there. They also provide good assistance to the creation of the legal framework. Universities and academic institutions have a good scientific and technical potential, as well as a large pool of scientific ideas and highly qualified personnel. Private organizations and businesses also have some funding. They are able to replicate high-tech products. Experience shows that the integration of these elements is possible only if they strive toward a common goal. 3. Characteristic Properties of Management Management of İCT-technoparks has many aspects. On one hand, the technopark - is an object, the framework of which requires full management of innovations, including project management, management of substantive directions of conducted developments, and investment management [10]. On the other ICT-technopark is a business structure, engaged in rendering a wide range of professional services to innovative resident-companies. Finally, the technopark-is a property complex where processes of cost-effective property management must be organized. These management aspects require development of an effective management system, operation of which results in a balanced policy in the field of innovation, rendering services, property management, which leads to the achieving the objectives of creation of a technology park and stated targets of commercial and budget efficiency [3, 17]. The main objective of the management authority of a technology park is to achieve advanced positions of information-technology branch on the global market through creation and improvement of high-tech and competitive production on the basis of favourable economic, social, legal and other conditions. The basic tasks of management authority of a ICT-technoparks are formed based on objective (Figure 1). Figure 1. Main tasks of management authorities of a ICT-technoparks. 4. Basic Models of Management The success of a technopark is largely dependent upon the effectiveness of choice of management model both at the creation phase and the development phase of the ICT-park. organization of transparent and clear relationship of management company and partners of the ICT-technoparks is an important element of the creation stage of a technopark, who are in the professionals that build the transferred part of the ICT-technoparks a timely manner in accordance with the requirements and wishes of its residents, but with the general requirements for construction of the park. In this regard, the relationship with the partners of the ICT-technopark is built by concluding investment agreements or joint venture agreements. At this, the right to lease land will be the contribution the management company, while the partner s contribution will be the funds needed for the implementation of its project. In proportion to the contribution, areas from constructed facilities may be transferred to the managing company according to the results of the project. Selection of

Science Journal of Business and Management 2016; 4(6): 199-203 201 partners is carried out by the management company, taking into account the following factors: experience of realization of similar projects, sufficiency of financial resources for the completion of construction, as well as the existing preliminary contracts or bids from potential tenants - hightech companies, etc. Generally, two basic models of management technology parks management company - operational management (OM) and management company - strategic management are known in the world. In the first case, the OM independently carries out all the functions of operational property management and operation [6]: Technical operation (operation of engineering infrastructure, support of real estate and engineering infrastructure in working order, maintenance, etc.); Commercial exploitation (marketing of ICTtechnoparks, search of residents, holding of talks with residents, contracts, etc.); Rendering additional services (logistics, information technologies, legal, financial etc.). Besides, the OM independently carries out the operational management of innovation: management of business incubator, rendering innovative services, search and attraction of innovative residents, etc. In the second case, the OM of ICT-technopark independently carries out only strategic management of real estate: Majority of the functions for operation and provision of additional services (technical maintenance, commercial exploitation, rendering additional services) are outsourced, i.e. specialized are contractors involved for implementation of these functions; OM selects contractors and monitors their activities. In addition, the OM of ICT-technopark attracts specialized outsourcing company for innovation management. Both indicated models are widely used in the world. However, it should be noted that each model is rarely implemented in "pure" form. Typically, İCT-technoparks select intermediate options with a focus on one of these models. The choice of a management model depends on such factors as: 1)the objectives of technoparks operation; 2)type pf property of technopark; 3) presence of the state as an investor, and 4)the level of development of service market for operation and maintenance of real estate and innovative management etc. It should be noted that since the ICT-technoparks is an element of innovation systems, it is necessary to take into account that the formation and development of innovative systems are always in a constantly changing environment of innovation. Such an environment is a source of innovative ideas, development of innovative projects, their implementation and maintenance. Business - management model. Upon comprehensive planning and organization of operations of ICT-technopark, also modern technology must be actively used to develop its own unique business model. Such models allow us to activate innovative processes due to generation of science based business residents and provide achievement of the high productiveness of operations of the technology park. Business model in the general case is a harmonious blend of the company's objectives, management system, the requirements of the investment portfolio, of the interaction system of participating elements and principles of organization of activities of the technology park. [5] Upon formation of the business model of OM of ICTtechnoparks, it is necessary to carry out the evaluation of the parameters of external environment such as scientific and research potential of the region, innovative activity of scientific-research organizations and higher education institutions, priorities of regional socio-economic development, presence if free investment resources in the region and potential strategic investors, conditions of manufacturing and social infrastructure etc. 5. Controlling in Management System of Currently controlling systems are widely known in the world. Methods and techniques for controlling are reflected in companies in various fields of activity, from production companies to companies engaged in rendering services. Controlling - is a comprehensive management system of technopark aimed at coordination among management systems and monitoring of their effectiveness. Controlling can provide information - analytical support of decisionmaking processes during the management of a technopark [11, 12]. Controlling is functionally particularly focused direction of economic and organizational work of the İCT-technoparks. Controlling faces two sets of problems: 1)a complex task management system development: development, implementation and continuous improvement of the management of the ICT-technopark and 2)a set of tasks of operational management support: ensuring coordination of management activities on development and the achievement of the targets of technopark management through the organization and implementation of informational-analytical support. Controlling is an indispensable element of technopark management system. Controlling in ICT-technoparks should be focused on solving a number of strategic and operational objectives. Strategic objectives of controlling may be: 1) documentation of work processes of the units technology park and organization of their improvement, and 2) the development and improvement of the performance indicator system of the ICT-technoparks, and 3) analysis of strategic trends of development of technopark in terms of its economy, state of funds, volume, structure, 4) cost-effectiveness of rendered services provided; 5) others. Following can be underlined as part of the operational tasks of controlling of ICT-technopark: 1) operational analysis of financial and economic condition and results of

202 Rasim Mahammad Alguliyev et al.: Models and Mechanisms for the Management of the main operations of technopark, 2) analysis of the results of activity of technopark residents 3) Reporting to management on results of works and progress indicators, and 4) a comparative analysis of technopark in relation to other technoparks. One of the essential elements of the system management subsystem technopark should be risk management [3]. Risk management in the technopark begins with the decision to create it. At the initial stage it is important to assess the orientation of technopark, understand its industrial structure, operation model and objectively investigate the positive and negative factors influencing the success and productivity of its work. At this moment, there is a significant part of the risks emerging in association with the positioning of technopark, in particular: 1) the risks of market positioning, and 2) the risks of geographic positioning, and 3) political risks. Talking about a functioning technology park as an object of property infrastructure, innovation center, innovation center, risk groups such as following emerge: 1) market risks, 2) financial risks, and 3) operational risks, and 4) the non-purpose use risks. Note that these categories of risks pose a significant complexity for many operating technology parks. 6. İCT-Technoparks Management Mechanisms Mechanism or tools of technopark management is a set of rules and procedures for decision-making of the OM that affect the behavior of managed entities - in particular, the information they provide and their chosen actions [8, 9]. Content of İCT-technopark management consists of processes of planning, organization, motivation and control necessary to achieve the objectives of the technopark. Generally the managing company is charged with management of technoparks property, as well as implementation of its organizational activities in accordance with the goals and objectives of a technology park. Managing companies (MC) of technology park concentrate the functions of current and future management of technopark, promote development of business residents, renders business services to them. It attracts and accommodates scientific - technical businesses on the territory of the İCT-technoparks, renders services and manages the technology park. Let s note that, under the applicable law, the management company (MC) which carries the current strategic management and technology park, is the structural element of the İCT-technoparks that implements its system properties. Managing company plays a key role in the development and management stage of ICT-technoparks. Funds received by the managing company as a result of its operations are exclusively used for conduction of events related to infrastructural development of the ICT-technoparks and support of high-tech enterprises - residents as they enter the foreign and domestic markets [7, 14, 15]. Managing Company serves as a single operator for rendering services on the territory of the ICT-technoparks and as the chief organizer of interactions among residents, manages the area obtained from the sale of investment contracts, organizes the management of non-profit entities, as well as the activities of the special elements of innovation infrastructure. İCT-technoparks management tasks consist of the following stages: 1) monitoring and analysis of the current state of the managing system, and 2) forecast of its development, and 3) goal-setting, and 4) planning, 5) distribution of functions and resources; 6) stimulation; 7) control and operational management; 8)Analysis of changes [8]. Let s note that, a set of control mechanisms is necessary for the effective management of any system, including a İCTtechnoparks. It must be noted that nowadays management theory has gained significant experience in the development, research and implementation practice of the management mechanisms relevant throughout the management cycle, i.e., allowing implementing the functions of planning, organization, motivation and controlling [13]. 7. Conclusion Conducted analysis allows noting that, the key moments in the development of İCT-technoparks management mechanisms are taken into account by the above-mentioned factors and aspects. These management mechanisms will be improved continuously, depending on changing conditions in the economic environment. Therefore it is recommended to consider and use the indicated management aspects during development of different mechanisms of management systems of innovative structures in the field of high technologies. References [1] A. A. Maltseva, G. A. Marzak, A. S. Nekrasova. Analysis of regulatory basics of operations of managing companies of technology parks in modern conditions. J. Problem analysis and government-administration planning. 2, 2011, pp. 109-116. [2] N. V. Pankova, L. N. Borisoglebskaya, E. S. Dibrayeva. Formation of innovative infrastructure of the region considering the specifications of development of the technology park area. Vestnik the Leningrad State University. 2011. N2, pp. 7-21. [3] R. M. Alguliyev, A. G. Aliyev, R. O. Shahverdiyeva. High Techno-Parks in the economy of Azerbaijan and their management problems. ICIESM 2014: XI International Conference on Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management. Osaka, Japan. 2014. pp. 426-428. [4] N. I. Komkov, K. I. Lugovtsev, N. V. Yakunina. Information technology for the development and management of innovative projects. J. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2012, Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp 293-302. [5] V. N. Frolov. Management institutions of technology parks,

Science Journal of Business and Management 2016; 4(6): 199-203 203 their role in management organization. Vestnikof VU. 72. 2010. pp. 16-22. [6] Chen Ming, Cui Bibo, and Man Haiyan. Theoretical analysis of the effect of management control method on enterprise innovation model selection. 2012 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering. pp. 192-194. [7] S. V. Krasnov, D. Y. Nikulin. Management of IT-park as a complex socio-economic system. J. Volzhski University. 18, 2011. pp. 30-36. [8] D. A. Novikov. Methodology of management M.: Libro- Kom. Moscow 2011. pp-128. [9] Wang Huihui. Study on the Innovation of Industrial Park s Operating Mechanism. 2011 IEEE. pp. 240-243. [10] A. A. Bitlev. Improvement of the management system of infrastructural innovative entrepreneurship. J. Economics of regional development. 2011. pp. 444-450. [11] E. G. Russkova. Management of changes in the infrastructural support system of innovative activities. J. Terra Economics. 1, 2012. pp. S34-37. [12] T. V. Kolosova. Management of innovative development of an enterprise and competitiveness problems. J. Problems of modern economics. (34), 2010. pp. 46-49. [13] V. K. Tribushnaya. Innovative infrastructure as a necessity of support of science-based entrepreneurship: technology parks and strategic management: Monograph. Izhevsk. 2011, pp. 240. [14] Erik Buisman, Hans Frost, Ayoe Hoff, ArantzaMurillas, Jeffrey P. Powell. Evaluating Economic Efficiency of Innovative Management Regimes. Comparative Evaluations of Innovative Fisheries Management. 2009, pp 143-162. [15] Yong M. A, Shougui Luo. Management Innovation Capabilities Evaluation of Small and Medium-sized High-tech Enterprises in Shanghai. 2012 Fifth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering. pp. 641-645. [16] Carlo Cambini, Michael R. Ward, Tobias Kretschmer. ICT and Innovation. J. Information Economics and Policy, Volume 25, Issue 3, September 2013, pp. 107-108. [17] Gunnar Eliasson. The nature of economic change and management in a new knowledge based information economy. J. Information Economics and Policy. Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2005, pp. 428 456.