Former Maneuver Area A Remedial Investigation Fort Bliss, Texas. Public Meeting November 16, 2016

Similar documents
Final Meeting Minutes. Issued: July 7, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation

Hazard Level Category

MEC HA Training Example. San Antonio, TX March 2009

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation

1. David Henkin called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. and welcomed everyone.

APPENDIX B RISK ASSESSMENT

Case Study: Advanced Classification Contracting at Former Camp San Luis Obispo

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION OF THE CLOSED RANGES AT F.E. WARREN AFB: A CASE STUDY

MEC HA: A Tool in the Decision Making Toolbox

UTAH ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

1. Kevin Pien called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. and welcomed everyone.

Fort Meade Legacy BRAC Program Update High Explosive Impact (HEI) Area

Trial Use of the USACE Risk Management Method

Technical Project Planning Meeting #3 January 20, 2017 Remedial Investigation, Closed Castner Firing Range, Fort Bliss, Texas

Leading Change for Installation Excellence

2014 Annual Munitions and Explosives of Concern Inspection Report Potrero Canyon (Lockheed Martin Beaumont Site 1) Beaumont, California

Meeting Minutes Purcell NAGS RI/FS February 23, 2005

1. Kevin Pien called the meeting to order at 6:45 p.m. and welcomed everyone.

APPENDIX E INSTRUMENT VERIFICATION STRIP REPORT. Final Remedial Investigation Report for the Former Camp Croft Spartanburg, South Carolina Appendices

Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response

Revised Site 1 Burn Pit Area (BPA) Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) Phase 2 Report Lockheed Martin Corporation, Beaumont Site 1 Beaumont, Cal

Terminology and Acronyms used in ITRC Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response Training

Paul Black, Ph.D. Kate Catlett, Ph.D. Mark Fitzgerald, Ph.D. Will Barnett, M.S.

FINAL. SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) REPORT ALPHA AREA McCLELLAN, ALABAMA

Final Meeting Minutes. May 6, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

FINAL REPORT. ESTCP Pilot Program Classification Approaches in Munitions Response Camp Butner, North Carolina JUNE 2011

Munitions and Explosives of Concern Hazard Assessment (MEC HA) Initiative. Joint Services Environmental Management Conference March 23, 2006

SURVEY OF SEAGRASS BEDS AT PLACEMENT AREA 62, WEST BAY CONTRACT FOR GIWW, TEXAS CAUSEWAY U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONTRACT NO.

FINAL PILOT STUDY ADVANCED GEOPHYSICAL CLASSIFICATION

Phase I: Evaluate existing and promising UXO technologies with emphasis on detection and removal of UXO.

Unexploded ordnance (UXO) contamination is a high-priority problem for the Department of Defense (DoD). As

MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN HAZARD ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE. Public Review Draft

Introduction to Classification Methods for Military Munitions Response Projects. Herb Nelson

GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. February 8, Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner 101 Main Street Town of Ashland Ashland, MA 01721

TECHNICAL REPORT. ESTCP Project MR Live Site Demonstrations - Massachusetts Military Reservation SEPTEMBER John Baptiste Parsons

Abstract. Introduction

Appendix C: Quality Assurance Project Plan DRAFT Phase II Interim Action Work Plan

Airborne Radiological Characterization Surveys in Inaccessible Areas Due to the Presence of Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC)

Appendix F.4 Noise. 2. Ambient Sound Measurements at Northwest Field, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam (March 2015)... F.4-54

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

Welcome Thanks for joining us. ITRC s Internet-based Training Program. Survey of Munitions Response Technologies

APPENDIX: ESTCP UXO DISCRIMINATION STUDY

FINAL REPORT MUNITIONS CLASSIFICATION WITH PORTABLE ADVANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSORS. Demonstration at the former Camp Beale, CA, Summer 2011

MEMS S&A FOR MUNITIONS To: JOINT ARMAMENTS CONFERENCE EXHIBITION & FIRING DEMONSTRATION Small Arms Session MAY 19, 2010

CITY OF RICHMOND SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE SUBMITTAL, REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES

DEMONSTRATION REPORT

(MR ) February This document has been cleared for public release; Distribution Statement A

FINAL Geophysical Test Plot Report

(MR ) Demonstration of Advanced Geophysics and Classification Technologies on Munitions Response Sites

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Innovative Environmental Data Management System Facilitates UXO Data Collection and Management at Fort A.P. Hill Virginia

COMAPARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS FROM EM-61 AND BEEP MAT FOR UXO IN BASALTIC TERRAIN. Abstract

Quality Management for Advanced Classification. David Wright Senior Munitions Response Geophysicist CH2M HILL

B.2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST

August 18, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: CECC-L 441 G Street NW Washington, D.C Attn: Docket ID No.

THE CASE FOR SAFETY AND SUITABILITY FOR SERVICE ASSESSMENTS TO BE BASED ON A MANUFACTURE TO DISPOSAL SEQUENCE

Conceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City


2017 Munitions and Explosives of Concern Inspection Report Potrero Canyon (Lockheed Martin Beaumont Site 1) Beaumont, California

Marine Corps Support Facility-Blount Island: Integrated Natural Resources Program Successes. E2S2 Conference May 12, 2011

2. As such, Proponents of Antenna Systems do not require permitting of any kind from the Town.

Minor Site Plan Application and Checklist Land Disturbing Activities

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) Information Requirements

Table of Contents. List of Tables... ii List of Figures... ii Acronyms and Abbreviations... iii

2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

Appendix B. Historical Aerial Photograph Review

APPENDIX I Geophysical Data. Geophysical data is provided in the electronic copy of this report.

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON * * * *

Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist

Advanced EMI Data Collection Systems' Demonstration

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

At any given time along a large swath of rural, northern. A Global Differential GPS Solution for Clearing Unexploded Ordnance GPS GALILEO GLONASS

Discrimination of Munitions and Explosives of Concern at F.E.Warren AFB using Linear Genetic Programming

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS PRINCESS PALM AVENUE, SUITE 120 TAMPA, FLORIDA

Documents: Response letter and attachments, Prepared by: AMEC Massachusetts, Inc., Dated February 17, 2016.

Advances in UXO classification

The CMRS Process. The NPA Approach to Dealing with Cluster Munitions Remnants in SEA. Jonathon Guthrie. 07 June 2017

FINAL REPORT. Marine Towed Array Technology Demonstration Blossom Point Research Facility. ESTCP Project MM-0324 AUGUST Dr.

AD NO. DTC PROJECT NO. 8-CO-160-UXO-021 REPORT NO. ATC-9418 STANDARDIZED UXO TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITE BLIND GRID SCORING RECORD NO.

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JUNE 30, 2014 JULY 06, 2014)

Archaeo-Geophysical Associates, LLC

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDINGSTRONG

Appendix F: Archaeology VEIRS MILL CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT

The SMArt 155 SFW. Is it reasonable to refer to it as a cluster munition?

Checklist for Minor Plan Modification

Summerland Planning Advisory Committee. SunPAC Meeting #31 April 28, 2011

Appendix A Dispersed Use Survey Instrument

EAPS, Slide 1. Presented by; Phil Brislin RDECOM-ARDEC

ZONING R-LI Low Intensity Residential District. [Amended by Ord. No. 1684] PERMITTED USES BY RIGHT.

Senior Management Board Bourne Best Western March 26, :30 6:45 p.m. Meeting Minutes

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

Main Menu. Summary: Introduction:

Subject: Oil & Natural Gas Industry Response to Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Aluminum

PREPARATION GUIDELINES FOR UDFCD MAINTENANCE SITE PLAN

Revised Public Hearing Minutes Approved Tuesday, August 5, :00 p.m.

U.S. Army veteran says mice drove her and her autistic son out of their apartment home

Map and Drawing Standards for the South Pacific Division Regulatory Program

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JANUARY 27, 2014 FEBRUARY 2, 2014)

Transcription:

Former Maneuver Area A Remedial Investigation Fort Bliss, Texas Public Meeting November 16, 2016

Agenda Purpose Terminology Location and Use of Former Maneuver Area A Description of the Remedial Investigation Remedial Investigation Results Alternatives for Remedial Action Preferred Alternatives for Each Site

Purpose Fulfill the requirement to seek public input into the Decision Document for four sites within Fort Bliss Former Maneuver Area A Present the proposed plan and the preferred alternative at each of the four sites within the Former Maneuver Area A The public comment period ends December 6, 2016

Terminology Remedial Investigation (RI) in depth study of a contaminated site to determine the nature and extent of contamination Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) military munitions that may pose an explosive risks (i.e., unexploded ordnance) to receptors 4.2-inch mortar discovered at Fort Bliss Maneuver Area A

Terminology Munitions Constituents (MC) materials or their breakdown products released from unexploded ordnance or other munitions Munitions Debris (MD) remnants of military munitions (e.g., fragments, projectiles, casings) remaining after use or disposal (item has detonated but pieces of the item remain) Types of munitions debris

Location and Use of Former Maneuver Former Maneuver Area A is located east of Fort Bliss The site was historically utilized for military training exercises None of the land is currently owned by or located in an areas utilized by Fort Bliss for training activities Area A

Description of the Remedial Investigation RI fieldwork was completed in 2013 The fieldwork consisted of the following (discussed further on following slides): Visual Surveys Geophysical/Intrusive Investigation MC Sampling MEC Disposal

Visual Surveys A total of 5,033,28 linear feet of visual transects were completed. MD identified included: (32) 105mm fragments (3) 20mm fragments (138) 4.2-inch fragments (201) fragments of unspecified ordnance (9) fuzes (3) grenades (9) practice bombs

Geophysical/Intrusive Investigation Geophysical investigations were completed at 12 smaller areas within Former Maneuver Area A DGM Collection in litter mode All anomalies identified during the geophysical investigation were included in the intrusive investigation

Geophysical/Intrusive Investigation Example of geophysical investigations transects completed in MRS FTBLS-002-R-04

MEC Disposal Disposal of a 4.2-inch mortar

Remedial Investigation Results Based on the results of the RI, the Former Maneuver Area A was subdivided into smaller areas Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-01) Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-03) Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-04) Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-05)

Former Maneuver Area A Encompasses 23,357 acres Property owned by 2,514 landowners and the State of Texas (Texas General Land Office) Current uses include residential homes, commercial businesses, light industry, and undeveloped land (FTBLS-002-R-01) Shaded areas indicates the properties included within the boundaries of FTBLS-002-R-01

Former Maneuver Area A No MEC discovered (FTBLS-002-R-01) 34 MD items identified on the surface and 25 MD items recovered in the subsurface Some MD items included: 105mm projectile fragments 4.2-inch mortar fragments Practice bombs Grenade fragments

520 acres Privately owned Former Maneuver Area A Sparsely vegetated, undeveloped land utilized for ranching and recreation (FTBLS-002-R-03) Geophysical investigation transects at FTBLS-002-R-03

One MEC item discovered Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-03) 87 MD items identified on the surface and 378 MD items recovered from the subsurface 4.2-inch mortar fragments M2 fuzes Bomb Fins Flare Casings 37mm Casings Concentrated areas of 4.2-inch mortar MD suggests the area was historically used as a target MC sampling completed at FTBLS-002-R-03 indicated contaminants of concern are below TCEQ screening levels

Geophysical investigation transects at FTBLS-002-R-04 Former Maneuver Area A Encompasses 397 acres Owned by the State of Texas (Texas General Land Office) and leased to a private individual Site is located within a larger fenced area Undeveloped land utilized for ranching and recreation (FTBLS-002-R-04)

Former Maneuver Area A Two MEC items identified (FTBLS-002-R-04) 78 MD items discovered on the surface and 355 MD items recovered from the subsurface 4.2-inch mortar fragments and baseplates M2 fuzes Concentrated areas of MD suggest the area was historically used as a target for 4.2-inch mortars MC sampling completed at FTBLS-002-R-04 indicated all contaminants of concern are below TCEQ screening levels

Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-05) Encompasses 203 acres Currently owned by the State of Texas (Texas General Land Office) and leased to a private individual Site is located within a larger fenced area Undeveloped land utilized for ranching and recreation

Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-05) Geophysical investigation transects in the western portion of FTBLS-002-R-05 Geophysical investigation transects in the eastern portion of FTBLS-002-R-05

Former Maneuver Area A Two MEC items identified (FTBLS-002-R-05) 4 MD items identified on the surface and 69 MD items were recovered in the subsurface 4.2-inch mortar fragments M2 fuzes Concentrated areas of MD suggest the area was historically used as a target for 4.2-inch mortars MC sampling completed at FTBLS-002-R-05 indicated all contaminants of concern are below TCEQ screening levels

Alternatives for Remedial Action The feasibility study considered the following alternatives to address MEC and/or MD identified at the four sites: No Action Public Awareness Program Land Use Controls MEC Surface Clearance MEC Surface and Subsurface Clearance

No Action No Action alternative assumes No Further Action would be taken No land use controls would be implemented No capital or operations and maintenance costs This alternative is required as a baseline comparison purposes

Public Awareness Program The public awareness program would include the following: Maintaining the administrative record and information repository Preparing and issuing press releases Preparing and distributing fact sheets Updating the Public Affairs Mailing List Public Meetings

Land Use Controls The land use controls alternative would include the following: Implementing the public awareness program Installation of physical barriers (fences) and warnings (signs) Periodic inspections to assess the condition of the site

MEC Surface Clearance The MEC surface clearance alternative would include the following: Completing a 100 percent surface clearance of the site Implementing the public awareness program Periodic inspections to assess the condition of the site

MEC Surface Clearance and MEC Subsurface Removal The MEC surface clearance and MEC subsurface removal alternative would include the following: Completing surface clearance of the entire site Completing a subsurface clearance to 4 feet below ground surface of the entire site

Evaluation of Alternatives Each alternative was evaluated against the following nine criteria: Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements Short-Term Effectiveness Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, and Volume through Treatment Implementability Cost State Acceptance Community Acceptance

Selection of Preferred Alternatives The alternatives were evaluated for each site. Based on the results of the evaluations a preferred alternative has been selected for each site. The preferred alternative: Is technically and administratively feasible Provides the best balance of cost and reduction of risk to human health

Preferred Alternative for Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-01) The preferred alternative is the Public Awareness Program. This alternative was selected because: No MEC items identified Limited amounts of MD identified No risks to human health identified

Preferred Alternative for Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-03) The preferred alternative is MEC surface clearance and MEC subsurface removal. This alternative was selected because: MEC identified at this site MD identified at this site in concentrations suggesting it was a target area There is the potential for interactions between receptors and MEC items The remedy is technically feasible and provides the best balance of effectiveness and risk reduction

Preferred Alternative for Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-04) The preferred alternative is the MEC surface clearance and MEC subsurface removal. This alternative was selected because: MEC identified MD identified in concentrations suggesting it was a target area There is the potential for interactions between receptors and MEC items The remedy is technically feasible and provides the best balance of effectiveness and risk reduction

Preferred Alternative for Former Maneuver Area A (FTBLS-002-R-05) The preferred alternative is MEC surface clearance and MEC subsurface removal. This alternative was selected because: MEC identified MD identified in concentrations suggesting it was a target area There is the potential for interactions between receptors and MEC items The remedy is technically feasible and provides the best balance of effectiveness and risk reduction

General Information Comments on the Proposed Plans will be accepted until December 6, 2016 The Proposed Plans are available for review at: Directorate of Public Works Environmental (DPW-ED) Building 622 Taylor Road Fort Bliss, Texas 79916 Ron Baca Phone: (915) 568-7979 Comments or questions should be addressed to: United States Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District Attn: Frank Roepke 1645 South 101st East Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128 Phone: (918) 669-7444 E-mail: frank.roepke@usace.army.mil

Questions