The Impact of Performance Parameters over a DGPS Satellite Navigation System

Similar documents
The Performance Evaluation of DGPS Data Correction Links in Dynamic Environments

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology

Sources of Error in Satellite Navigation Positioning

GPS: The Basics. Darrell R. Dean, Jr. Civil and Environmental Engineering West Virginia University. Expected Learning Outcomes for GPS

ONCORE ENGINEERING NOTE M12 Oncore

GPS and Recent Alternatives for Localisation. Dr. Thierry Peynot Australian Centre for Field Robotics The University of Sydney

Resection. We can measure direction in the real world! Lecture 10: Position Determination. Resection Example: Isola, Slovenia. Professor Keith Clarke

What is a GPS How does GPS work? GPS Segments GPS P osition Position Position Accuracy Accuracy Accuracy GPS A pplications Applications Applications

PRINCIPLES AND FUNCTIONING OF GPS/ DGPS /ETS ER A. K. ATABUDHI, ORSAC

Primer on GPS Operations

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS. Knowing where and when

GPS (Introduction) References. Terms

Chapter 4 DGPS REQUIREMENTS AND EQUIPMENT SELECTION

Effect of Quasi Zenith Satellite (QZS) on GPS Positioning

The GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM James R. Clynch February 2006

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS

Errors in GPS. Errors in GPS. Geodetic Co-ordinate system. R. Khosla Fall Semester

GPS (Introduction) References. Terms

Introduction to the Global Positioning System

Performance Evaluation of the Effect of QZS (Quasi-zenith Satellite) on Precise Positioning

ESTIMATION OF IONOSPHERIC DELAY FOR SINGLE AND DUAL FREQUENCY GPS RECEIVERS: A COMPARISON

EUROPEAN GNSS (GALILEO) INITIAL SERVICES NAVIGATION SOLUTIONS POWERED BY E U R O P E OPEN SERVICE QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Trails: the achilles heel of mapping from the air / satellites

Lecture 8: GIS Data Error & GPS Technology

GPS Receiver. User s Guide. Dec Rev. A

UNIT 1 - introduction to GPS

Blind Navigation via a DGPS-based Hand-held Unit

Mitigate Effects of Multipath Interference at GPS Using Separate Antennas

Worst-Case GPS Constellation for Testing Navigation at Geosynchronous Orbit for GOES-R

Introduction to NAVSTAR GPS

RESOLUTION MSC.112(73) (adopted on 1 December 2000) ADOPTION OF THE REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SHIPBORNE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)

Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Prof. Talat Ahmad Vice-Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia Delhi

Appendix D Brief GPS Overview

GPS Errors. Figure 1. Four satellites are required to determine a GPS position.

ONCORE ENGINEERING NOTE SL Oncore

What is GPS? GPS Position Accuracy. GPS Applications. What is a GPS. How does GPS work? GPS Segments

The Benefits of Three Frequencies for the High Accuracy Positioning

Introduction to Geographic Information Science. Last Lecture. Today s Outline. Geography 4103 / GNSS/GPS Technology

Global Navigation Satellite Systems II

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

Performance Evaluation of Differential Global Navigation Satellite System with RTK Corrections

Assessing the Accuracy of GPS Control Point, Using Post-Processed and Absolute Positioning Data

CH GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO/SBAS Signal Simulator. General specification Version 0.2 Eng. Preliminary

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) PERFORMANCE OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2013 QUARTERLY REPORT. GPS Performance 08/01/14 08/01/14 08/01/14.

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) PERFORMANCE APRIL TO JUNE 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) PERFORMANCE JANUARY TO MARCH 2016 QUARTERLY REPORT

VARIATION OF STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY USING GPS-SINGLE FREQUENCY OBSERVATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)

Introduction to the Global Positioning System

GNSS & Coordinate Systems

TEST YOUR SATELLITE NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE ON YOUR ANDROID DEVICE GLOSSARY

Chapter 6 GPS Relative Positioning Determination Concepts

GNSS 101 Bringing It Down To Earth

Receiver Technology CRESCENT OEM WHITE PAPER AMY DEWIS JENNIFER COLPITTS

ANALYSIS OF GPS SATELLITE OBSERVABILITY OVER THE INDIAN SOUTHERN REGION

Integration of GPS with a Rubidium Clock and a Barometer for Land Vehicle Navigation

CARRIER PHASE VS. CODE PHASE

GM-270. CF GPS Receiver. User s Guide

Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications Second Edition

Fundamentals of GPS Navigation

METIS Second Master Training & Seminar. Augmentation Systems Available in Egypt

Performance Evaluation of Global Differential GPS (GDGPS) for Single Frequency C/A Code Receivers

GPS SMART ANTENNA (GWG4287SX)

Recommendations on Differential GNSS

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) PERFORMANCE JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2018 QUARTERLY REPORT 3

Introduction. Global Positioning System. GPS - Intro. Space Segment. GPS - Intro. Space Segment - Contd..

t =1 Transmitter #2 Figure 1-1 One Way Ranging Schematic

GPS Surveying - System 300

SSR Technology for Scalable Real-Time GNSS Applications

SUP500F8. Low-Power High-Performance Low-Cost 167 Channel GPS Smart Antenna Module. Features. Applications

GPS STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY VARIATION WITH OBSERVATION RECORDING INTERVAL FOR HYDROGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Differential Corrections

Keywords: GPS/GLONASS, Precise Point Positioning, Kinematic, Hydrography

GPS Time Synchronization with World-Class Accuracy using a Few Selected Satellites

GPS Glossary Written by Carl Carter SiRF Technology 2005

Experiences with Fugro's Real Time GPS/GLONASS Orbit/Clock Decimeter Level Precise Positioning System

Lecture-1 CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION TO GPS

GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS (GNSS) ECE 2526E Tuesday, 24 April 2018

EM-401. GPS ENGINE BOARD with Active Antenna PRODUCT GUIDE. Globalsat Technology Corporation (Taiwan)

Bluetooth GPS Navigator

Simulation Analysis for Performance Improvements of GNSS-based Positioning in a Road Environment

Shared Use of DGPS for DP and Survey Operations

Optimal Pulsing Schemes for Galileo Pseudolite Signals

GPS Accuracy Comparison. Tom Biernacki Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SPAN Technology System Characteristics and Performance

Absolute Antenna Calibration

Phase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered Antenna Array

GPS NAVSTAR PR (XR5PR) N/A

GNSS Accuracy Improvements through Multipath Mitigation with New Signals and services

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) PERFORMANCE OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT

Smart Design Technology Co., Ltd.

A study of the ionospheric effect on GBAS (Ground-Based Augmentation System) using the nation-wide GPS network data in Japan

A GLONASS Observation Message Compatible With The Compact Measurement Record Format

EGNOS status and performance in the context of marine navigation requirements

GPS Error and Biases

32-channel GPS Engine Board SmartAntenna

Technical Manual. Flash version

Procedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections.

IMO WORLDWIDE RADIONAVIGATION SYSTEM (WWRNS) Study on Communication Techniques for High Accuracy DGPS in the Republic of Korea

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) PERFORMANCE JANUARY TO MARCH 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT

Installation Instructions

Transcription:

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4): 4711-4719, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 The Impact of Performance Parameters over a DGPS Satellite Navigation System 1 Madad Ali Shah, 2 Noor Ahmed Shaikh, 2 Ghulam Ali 1 Sukkur Institute of Business Administration, Sukkur, Pakistan 2 Shah Abdul-Latif University, Khairpur, Pakistan Abstract: This research demonstrates the impact of various performance parameters over a satellite based DGPS (Differential Global Positioning System) system. The four performance parameters selected for this research were number of satellites tracked, PDOP (Positioning Dilution of Precision), Age of differential correction data and selective availability (S/A). To analyze the impact of these parameters over the performance of the system, the experiments were performed with the DGPS system having Motorola GPS receiver based mobile unit and external antenna. The experimental data was collected for approximately 24 hours (i.e. 2-full satellite constellation period). The unreliable data was truncated following the standards of Navstar GPS specifications. The remaining data was processed and accuracy was calculated for the individual results. The impact of satellites in view and PDOP was measured and it was demonstrated that less PDOP provides better accuracy and vice versa and the accuracy of the system also depends upon the number of satellites tracked, that means if more satellites are tracked, the system provides much better accuracy. Another important set of experiments was performed to find the impact of age of differential correction data over the accuracy of the system. It was observed that the age of correction data has adverse impacts over the accuracy of the system in the presence of S/A and it has an extremely minute impact over the accuracy of the system in the absence of S/A. Key words: DGPS, Performance Parameters, PDOP, Selective Availability, Number of Satellites Tracked, Age of Differential Correction Data INTRODUCTION Global Positioning System (GPS) is a well-known satellite-based radio navigation system. It offers continuous 24 hours coverage a day, seven days a week and it also offers 3-D position, i.e. latitude, longitude and altitude. The GPS provides two types of services: the Standard Positioning Service (SPS) and the Precise Positioning Service (PPS). The SPS is designated for civil community, where as the PPS is restricted for US authorized military and selected Government agency users (Kaplan, 1996). A method to improve the positioning accuracy of SPS service is to use Differential GPS (DGPS) service. The DGPS is a phenomenon to make standalone GPS more accurate. DGPS works by cancelling out most of the natural and manmade correlated errors, which creep into normal GPS measurements. DGPS technique uses two or more than two GPS receivers, one of them has had its position surveyed and its precise position is known, that receiver is known as a reference base station. The other receivers in the system are known as mobile receivers that move about and known as rovers, and they are in the line of sight to the reference station. The reference station calculates pseudo range measurements, but as the reference station knows its precise position, it can calculate the biases for each measurement, known as differential corrections. These differential correction data are combined with the position obtained by the rover receiver to find the position with the DGPS accuracy (Hurn, 1993). The Selective Availability is an intentional degradation of the GPS signal by the U.S Government, with the objective to deny full accuracy to unauthorized users. The S/A is a part of the SPS, which was formally implemented on March 25, 1990. It was lifted completely on May 1, 2000 with the orders by American Presidency (Press Release, 2000). The degradation was accomplished through manipulation of the broadcast ephemeris data (orbital error component), referred as epsilon (g-process) and through dithering of the satellite clock (clock error component), referred as sigma (d-process). The d-process was achieved by introducing varying errors into the fundamental frequency of the satellite clock. The satellite clock bias has a direct impact on the pseudo-range, which is derived from a comparison of the satellite clock and receiver clock. Due to the fact that the S/A is generated at the transmitter side (i.e. the satellite), this error component is spatially Corresponding Author: Madad Ali Shah, Sukkur Institute of Business Administration, Sukkur, Pakistan Email: Madad@iba-suk.edu.pk 4711

correlated. It means that there is a strong relation between the error at one location and the error at a nearby location. The g-process was the truncation of the orbital information in the transmitted navigation message, so that the co-ordinates of the satellites can not accurately be computed. The error in satellite position roughly translates into a like position error of the receiver. These orbital errors cause pseudo-range errors. The broadcast ephemeris data contain different parameters, which mean that the error could be induced in various ways (Kaplan, 1996). The relationship between pseudo-range error and the total computed position can be determined by geometric factors as shown in Equation 3.31, known as DOP (Dilution of Precision). The DOP depends upon the number and the geometry of the satellites used. If four satellites are clustered near one another, then one meter of error in measuring distance may result in tens or hundreds of meters of error in position. But if many satellites are scattered widely around the sky, then the position error may be less than 1.5 meters for every meter of error in measuring distances. The effect of geometry of the satellite in the position error is called Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP), which can be interpreted as ratio of positioning error to the pseudo-range error. The PDOP is the most effective part of GDOP to degrade the performance of a DGPS navigation system (Kaplan, 1996). Another important performance parameter is Age of Differential Correction Data. The age of correction data shows how many seconds before the differential correction data are calculated by the DGPS reference base station. In the presence of S/A, the clock errors are higher. Therefore the differential correction data can be very effective against clock errors, their validity decreases with time. As S/A has relatively large and random magnitudes, therefore it dominates the error growth. The DGPS positioning error, therefore, grows as the DGPS correction ages (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). The discussed performance parameters can be measured by using various DGPS Navigation systems, but to mitigate the impacts of multipath errors, a special GNSS receiver is required, such as Javad JGG20 receiver, that can demonstrate a reasonable improvement in the performance of the system after mitigating multipath effects (Shah et al., 2002a). 2. Aim of the Research: The aim of this research is to observe the impact of PDOP and the no. of satellites tracked over the performance of the DGPS system and quantify the impact of age of differential correction data over the performance of the system when S/A was on and measure the improvements in the performance of the system when the S/A was turned off. 3. The Development of the DGPS Navigation System: A DGPS system has been constructed that consists of Focus FM-based differential corrections and a host PC on reference station side, and a laptop PC, Motorola M12 GPS receiver and Motorola M12 Oncore antenna. The connection between reference station and the mobile unit was established simply by connecting a serial cable, as both parts of the navigation system were inside the laboratory. This system is developed to measure the impact of various performance parameters and error sources over the DGPS navigation system. To measure the impact of the performance parameters, the experimental data of 2-full satellite constellations are required (i.e. 23-hours and 56-minutes). Therefore it was essential to conduct these experiments inside a building with an external antenna mounted on the top of the building roof. Hence the DGPS system was established based on Motorola M12 Oncore GPS receiver to measure the impact of discussed parameters over the performance of the DGPS system with an external Motorola Oncore antenna (Shah, 2002b). The block diagram of constructed DGPS system is shown in Fig. 1. 3.1 Motorola M12 Oncore GPS Receiver: Motorola M12 Oncore GPS receiver is a 12 parallel channel receiver. It can track 12 simultaneous satellites. It is smaller in size i.e. 40 x 60 x 10 mm (1.57 x 2.36 x 0.39 inches). It weighs only 25 grams. The M12 Oncore GPS receiver has a 2.75 to 3.2 supply voltage. It includes support capability for Inverse DGPS navigation systems. It also includes RTCM (Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services) differential GPS support, NMEA (National Marine Electronics Association) 0183 output, two communication ports and an antenna sense circuit. A right angle power/data connector allows for space saving vertical mounting and an optical straight power/data connector is available for a mount against the host circuit board. It uses standard datum WGS-84 format and is also compatible with British National grid system, used in this research. It provides output messages in latitude, longitude and height. It provides DGPS corrections at 9600 baud on Com- 1 port and RTCM SC (Special Committee)-104 format messages for DGPS at 2400, 4800 or 9600 baud on Com-2 port (Motorola and Manual, 1999). 4712

Fig. 1: DGPS Navigation System constructed for Performance Measurement. 3.2 Motorola Oncore Active GPS Antenna: The Oncore active GPS antenna is designed to operate with Motorola M12 GPS receiver. It is also compatible with many other GPS receivers from Motorola and other manufacturers as well. It is a low profile active microstrip patch and electrically shielded LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) assembly. Its input impedance is 50 ohms. It is right hand circular polarised with azimuth coverage of 360 degrees and elevation coverage of 0 degrees to 90 degrees. The antenna module is designed and tuned to efficiently collect the L1 band signals transmitted from GPS satellites at a nominal frequency of 1575.42 MHz. Once collected, the signals are amplified and relayed to the M12 GPS receiver. Signal pre-amplification within the antenna module is made possible by external power supplied by the M12 GPS receiver. The antenna module draws approximately 20mA of current at 5Vdc, directly from the antenna connector on the M12 GPS receiver. To measure the performance of the system, this antenna is mounted on the roof of the building to have all possible satellites in view. 3.3 Connection of Host Station and Mobile Unit: DGPS system consists of Focus FM-based differential corrections and a host PC on reference station side, and a laptop PC, Motorola M12 GPS receiver and Motorola M12 Oncore antenna. The connection between reference station and the mobile unit was established simply by connecting a serial cable, as both parts of the navigation system were inside the building. This system was established to measure the impact of discussed parameters over the performance of the navigation system. As Motorola receiver uses an external antenna, therefore all the performance experiments were measured with the system for 2 periodic satellite constellations (i.e. nearly 24-hurs) inside the building. 4. Performance Measurement Criteria: The experimental results were recorded into log files and then processed to find the accuracy of the developed system. As per the measurement criteria standards (GPS Navstar, 1995), the following rules were observed to measure the predictable accuracy of the designed DGPS system. The data records where the numbers of visible and tracked satellites were less than four were truncated. The data records having no GPS fix or 2-D fixes were also deleted. The records where the DGPS fix was not available were truncated as the performance parameters and impact were measured in DGPS mode. All the records having higher than 6.0 PDOP value were deleted, following GPS performance standards (GPS Navstar, 1995). All the records where the age of correction data was more than 60 seconds were deleted in DGPS mode (GPS Navstar, 1996). The measured latitudes and longitudes for every record were converted into Easting and Northing values following the conversion method. To find the accuracy for each record, the following formula was used. 4713

m ref m ref 2 2 H E E N N (1) where E m and N m are measured values of Easting and Northing, and E ref and N ref are the reference values in Easting and Northing showing the position of the reference antenna and H shows the accuracy in meters. These records were analyzed as per the nature of experiment and according to (D)GPS standards 50 th & 95 th percentiles were calculated to find 50% and 95% accuracy of the recorded data. 50 th & 95 th percentiles show 1s and 2s accuracy of the system (Parkinson and Spiker,m 1996). All the results in the following sections where percentiles are not shown are calculated with 95% accuracy 5. Methodology Adopted for Experiments: Each set of experiment was conducted for 24 hours and the data was recorded into corresponding log files for post-processing. In log files, each row contained columns representing latitude, longitude, height, PDOP, fix status (0 = Number fix, 2 = 2-D or 3 = 3-D), DGPS availability (No DGPS=0, DGPS=1), Number of satellites visible, Number of satellites tracked, Number of satellites for whom differential corrections were available and the age of correction data. As GPS satellites complete one full constellation in 11 hours and 58 minutes, therefore the records were limited to 23 hours and 56 minutes to have the data for 2 full satellite constellations (GPS Navstar, 1995). As Excel can process a maximum number of 64000 records, therefore the DGPS receiver was set to record the data with a time interval of 2 seconds to have 43080 records for the period of 23 hours and 56 minutes. (In case of 1-second time interval, the maximum number of records would be 86160 and that number exceeds the Excel data sheet s processing limit, therefore 2 seconds interval was selected). For Systems 1-4, the number of records where the DGPS fix was not available, were truncated as well, as the performance parameters and impact were measured in DGPS mode. All the records where the age of DGPS correction data was more than 60 seconds were deleted as per the DGPS standards (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). The overall deleted number of records counted less than 1% of all the available records, therefore more than 99% data were valid and utilized in performance analyses. These records were analyzed as per the nature of experiment and according to (D)GPS standards 50 th & 95 th percentiles were calculated to find 50% and 95% accuracy of the collected data. The details of these performance measurement experiments are shown in the following sections. These experiments show the impact of PDOP, number of satellites tracked and the age of correction data when the S/A was off and when it was on respectively, over the accuracy of the developed DGPS navigation system (Shah, 2002b). 6. Experimental Results and Analysis: The following experiments are performed to find the impact of PDOP, No of satellites tracked, Age of correction data in case of presence and absence of S/A. 6.1 The Impact of PDOP on the Performance of the System: The performance of DGPS systems is mainly affected by two factors i.e. the satellite geometry causing PDOP and the ranging errors ( ) and RMS positioning error = PDOP * (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). For the recorded constellation and results calculated following the criteria discussed, the Average PDOP calculated by the system was 2.7. The PDOP was varied between 1.63 and 8.0 for the recorded data. Following the GPS performance characteristics, all the records were deleted where the PDOP was less than 6.0. (GPS navstar, 1995). Fig. 2 shows the graph between PDOP and Accuracy. The sky-blue colour bricks show the 50% and dark-red colour bricks show 95% accuracy. It is evident from the graph that less PDOP provides better accuracy and vice versa. The horizontal axis shows the PDOP and vertical axis shows the accuracy recorded in meters in Fig. 2. 4714

Fig. 2: Graph Showing PDOP against Accuracy. As the experiments conducted shown in Fig. 2 show clearly that when the PDOP increases, it affects and degrades the accuracy of the DGPS system. A comparative research (Kaplan, 1996) has also been conducted to show the changing values of DOP in different cities. These experiments have been conducted in Anchorage, Berlin, Boston and Sydney. These experimental data have been recorded with the 1-minute interval over 24- hours period in contrast to the experiments conducted for this research with 2-second time interval. These experiments also reveal different DOP distributions at different locations (Kaplan, 1996). 6.2 Impact of the Number of Satellites Tracked on the Accuracy of the System: Another set of experiments was conducted to find the impact of satellites tracked over the performance of the developed DGPS navigation system following the discussed criteria. The minimum number of satellites required to calculate the position in a DGPS system is four, but it is desirable that five or more be in view at all times. When one satellite is going out of view, the user receiver must begin to transition to another satellite as per replacement. Furthermore, as the number of satellites tracked will increase; it will provide a sufficiently low PDOP and less number of satellites provides higher PDOP because of poor geometry at certain times (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). Following the standards discussed, the performance of the designed navigation system was observed for 2 full constellations. The constraints were the values of PDOP (i.e. less than 6) and satellite mask angle (i.e. 5 ). As shown in Fig. 3, an average of 8 satellites was trackable for most of the time in the University area. Very seldom a user sees only 4 satellites, when all 24 satellites are providing usable ranging signals. Fig. 3 shows the number of satellites tracked over the period of two satellite constellations in percentage format. The horizontal axis shows the number of satellites tracked and the vertical axis shows the % of time over 24 hours period approximately (i.e. 2 satellites constellation) (GSP Navstar, 1995). Fig. 3: Graph showing Satellites Visibility in Brunel over 24 hours Time Period. Fig. 4 shows the relevance between the number of satellites tracked over the accuracy of the navigation system. In Fig. 4, the horizontal axis shows the number of satellites tracked and the vertical axis shows the accuracy recorded in meters against the number of tracked satellites. It is shown that when more satellites are in view, the more satellites will be tracked and they provide better geometry, hence there will be less PDOP and it improves the accuracy of the system and with the less number of satellites tracked, the accuracy of the system degrades. 4715

Fig. 4: Graph Showing Accuracy against the Number of Visible Satellites. The satellite visibility experiments shown in Fig. 3 are conducted in Brunel University area. In these experiments, the average number of visible satellites was eight. Another comparative research shows the satellite visibility experiments conducted in various parts of the world at different latitudes. The results have been averaged over all user position longitudes at that latitude. Fig. 5 shows the satellite visibility profiles at 0, 35, 40 and 90 latitudes respectively. The majority of the time there are 7 or 8 satellites are visible apart from the results at 0 -latitude, where 9 satellites were visible for more than half of the time period (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). These experiments have also been conducted like Brunel research experiments with 5 satellite mask elevation angle. Fig. 5(a): Satellite Visibility Profile at 0-Latitude. Fig. 5(b): Satellite Visibility Profile at 35-Latitude. Fig. 5(c): Satellite Visibility Profile at 40-Latitude. 4716

Fig. 5(d): Satellite Visibility Profile at 90-Latitude. 6.3 The Impact of Age of Correction Data on the Accuracy of the System: The mobile station records the age of correction data as it combines the differential corrections with the positioning information. If the mobile station does not receive the differential correction data for next calculated position, it combines the previously received DGPS correction data with the calculated position (Blanchard, 1995). The age of correction data has totally different impact over the accuracy of the positioning system in the presence and absence of Selective Availability (Ptasinski et al., 2000). Therefore a number of experiments were performed to find the impact of age of correction data over the developed navigation system. These experiments were subdivided into two main categories i.e.: 1. The impact of age of correction data over the accuracy of the developed DGPS system in the presence of S/A. 2. The impact of age of correction data over the accuracy of the developed DGPS system in the absence of S/A. 6.3.1 The Impact of Age of Correction Data in the Presence of S/A: In the presence of S/A, clock errors have higher values, i.e. in the range of 20-30 meters (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). The validity of clock errors decreases with time and does not decrease with distance. As S/A has relatively large and random velocity and acceleration magnitudes, therefore it dominates the error growth in the presence of S/A. In this connection, a set of experiments was conducted and the data was sorted with the reference to the age of differential corrections. Fig 6 shows the graph between the age of differential correction data against the observed accuracy of the developed navigation system, in the presence of S/A. It is evident from the graph that as the age of correction data increases, the accuracy of the DGPS system decreases. The light-colour blocks show the 50% accuracy and the dark-colour blocks show the 95% accuracy of the navigation system. 6.3.2 The Impact of Age of Correction Data in the Absence of S/A.: In the absence of S/A, the clock errors have smaller values in contrast to the clock errors in presence of S/A. Therefore the clock errors change very slowly. During periods when S/A was not activated, the clock errors were measured as 1-2 meters (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996). Fig 7 shows the graph between the age of differential correction data against the measured accuracy of the developed navigation system in the absence of age of correction data. The graph shows clearly that the age of correction data does not have any significant impact over the accuracy of the system. Here in this graph the light-colour blocks show the 50% accuracy and the dark-colour blocks show the 95% accuracy of the system. The age of correction data experiments have been conducted before and after the removal of S/A, i.e. 1 st May 2000. The experimental results reveal that the performance of the DGPS navigation system is significantly improved after S/A was turned off. A similar type of research (Parkinson and Spiker, 1996) also shows that the performance of the DGPS system is degraded when the age of correction data increases in the presence of S/A. The experiments conducted in Brunel University also prove that in the absence of S/A, the age of differential correction data does not have any significant impact over the performance of the system. Therefore if the DGPS corrections are unavailable for a short period of time, the system s performance will less likely be affected (Ptasinski et al., 2000). 4717

Fig. 6: Accuracy against the Age of Correction Data when S/A is on Fig. 7: Accuracy against the Age of Correction Data when S/A is Off. Conclusions: To analyze the impact of various parameters over the performance of the system, the experiments were performed with the DGPS Navigation system having Motorola GPS receiver based mobile unit and external antenna. The impact of satellites in view and PDOP were measured and it was demonstrated that less PDOP provides better accuracy and vice versa and the accuracy of the system also depends upon the number of satellites tracked, that means if more satellites are tracked, the system provides better accuracy. A similar research has also been discussed to conduct DOP experiments in various cities around the world having different latitudes. Another important set of experiments was performed to find the impact of age of differential correction data over the accuracy of the system. It was observed that the age of correction data has adverse impact over the accuracy of the system in the presence of S/A and it has a negligible impact over the accuracy of the system in the absence of S/A. Future Work: The following modifications are suggested to be implemented in the system for further improvements. The use of a combined GPS-GLONASS-Galileo receiver to obtain better satellites coverage and visibility of the system. Use a special GNSS receiver to combat and mitigate multipath effects that is expected to further improve the performance of the navigation system. Use of a combined gyroscope-based Dead-reckoning navigation system, when GNSS data are lost or become unreliable or differential service becomes unavailable (Ptasinski et al, 1999). Effective utilization of Kalman filtering to refine the performance of the DGPS navigation system. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first author would like to thank his supervisors Professor W. Balachandran for his constant help and support. The author would also like to thank GPS research group within System Engineering department, Brunel University Uxbridge for their encouragement. 4718

REFERENCES Blanchard, W.F., 1995, The Air Pilot s Guide to Satellite Positioning System, Airlife Publishing Ltd, Shrewsbury, England. GPS Navstar, 1995, Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Signal Specification, GPS NAVSTAR, 2 nd Edition, U.S.A. GPS Navstar, 1996. Navstar GPS User Equipment Introduction, Public Release Version, U.S.A. Hurn, J., 1993, Differential GPS Explained, Trimble Navigation Ltd., U.S.A. Kaplan, E.D., 1996, Understanding GPS, Principles and Applications, Artech House, Boston, London. Motorola M12 Manual, 1999, M12 Oncore User s Manual, Jan. U.S.A. Parkinson, B.W., J.J. Spiker, 1996, Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Vol. I and II, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. Washington DC. Press Release, 2000, Statement by the President regarding the U.S. decision to stop degrading global positioning accuracy, May. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, U.S.A. Website: (http://www.laafb.af.mil/smc/cz/homepage/sa-pressrleases.htm). Ptasinski, P., M.A. Shah, F. Cecelja, W. Balachandran, 2000, Use of a Mobile Telephone as a communication link for correction data transmission in a DGPS system, Proceedings of GNSS2000 Conference, May. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. pp: 1249 1253. Shah, M.A., F. Cecelja, C. Hudson, W. Balachandran, 2000, An Integrated system to improve the performance of Brunel DGPS System, Proceedings of GNSS2000 conference, May. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp: 369 379. Shah, M.A., 2002a, Multipath Mitigation in Various Environments for Blind Navigation, The Proceedings of ION GPS 2002 Conference, 24-27 Sep 2002, Portland, Oregon. USA. Shah, M.A., 2002b, Brunel DGPS System for Blind Navigation, PhD Thesis, March 2002, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK. 4719