Introduction to Ionospheric Radar Remote Sensing

Similar documents
Radars: Powerful tools to study the Upper Atmosphere

Incoherent Scatter Experiment Parameters

SuperDARN (Super Dual Auroral Radar Network)

ISR Coordinated Science at Equatorial Latitudes

Radio Observatorio de Jicamarca - Instituto Geofísico del Perú

INTRODUCTION TO RADAR SIGNAL PROCESSING

Modern radio techniques

EE 529 Remote Sensing Techniques. Radar

AGF-216. The Earth s Ionosphere & Radars on Svalbard

Jicamarca Radio Observatory: 50 years of scientific and engineering achievements

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

Detection of Targets in Noise and Pulse Compression Techniques

9.4 Temporal Channel Models

ESA Radar Remote Sensing Course ESA Radar Remote Sensing Course Radar, SAR, InSAR; a first introduction

Radar Reprinted from "Waves in Motion", McGourty and Rideout, RET 2005

Communication Channels

Radar interferometric imaging for the EISCAT Svalbard Radar

Lecture Topics. Doppler CW Radar System, FM-CW Radar System, Moving Target Indication Radar System, and Pulsed Doppler Radar System

EISCAT_3D The next generation European Incoherent Scatter radar system Introduction and Brief Background

Wideband Channel Characterization. Spring 2017 ELE 492 FUNDAMENTALS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 1

Radar for Atmosphere and Ionosphere Study

Radar-Verfahren und -Signalverarbeitung

Basic Radar Definitions Introduction p. 1 Basic relations p. 1 The radar equation p. 4 Transmitter power p. 9 Other forms of radar equation p.

The Role of Ground-Based Observations in M-I I Coupling Research. John Foster MIT Haystack Observatory

Multi Band Passive Forward Scatter Radar

Wireless Channel Propagation Model Small-scale Fading

The EISCAT Heating Facility

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *

Digital Sounder: HF Diagnostics Module:Ionosonde Dual Channel ( ) Eight Channel ( )

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE OF RADAR NETWORK FOR MONITORING OF HAZARDOUD WEATHER

EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 3 : Week # (12) Mobile Radio Propagation: Small-Scale Path Loss

IONOSPHERE AND ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH WITH RADARS

ERAD Proceedings of ERAD (2004): c Copernicus GmbH J. Pirttilä 1, M. Lehtinen 1, A. Huuskonen 2, and M.

Aperture synthesis radar imaging in coherent scatter radars: Lesson from Jicamarca

Channel. Muhammad Ali Jinnah University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. Multi-Path Fading. Dr. Noor M Khan EE, MAJU

SODAR- sonic detecting and ranging

Ionospheric Propagation Effects on W de Bandwidth Sig Si nals Dennis L. Knepp NorthWest Research NorthW Associates est Research Monterey California

Dartmouth College SuperDARN Radars

ESA Contract 13945/99 Technical management by R. Jehn, ESOC. September 1, 2000

Mobile Radio Propagation: Small-Scale Fading and Multi-path

Existing and future networks of ionospheric radars in polar regions &

Study of small scale plasma irregularities. Đorđe Stevanović

Lecture 02. Introduction of Remote Sensing

S Transmission Methods in Telecommunication Systems (5 cr) Tutorial 4/2007 (Lectures 6 and 7)

Written Exam Information Transmission - EIT100

Measurements of doppler shifts during recent auroral backscatter events.


Written Exam Information Transmission - EIT100

Development of Broadband Radar and Initial Observation

Passive VHF Radar Interferometer Implementation, Observations, and Analysis

Amplitude domain estimation of narrow incoherent radar targets

Narrow- and wideband channels

Incoherent Scatter Radars Present, Past and Future. Bob Robinson Geospace Facilities Program National Science Foundation

Objectives. Presentation Outline. Digital Modulation Lecture 03

Study on the Characteristics of LFM Signals, BC Signals and Their Mixed Modulation Signals

Mobile Radio Propagation Channel Models

Multi-Path Fading Channel

Time and Frequency Domain Windowing of LFM Pulses Mark A. Richards

Determination of the correlation distance for spaced antennas on multipath HF links and implications for design of SIMO and MIMO systems.

UNIT- 7. Frequencies above 30Mhz tend to travel in straight lines they are limited in their propagation by the curvature of the earth.

arxiv: v1 [physics.data-an] 9 Jan 2008

EITN90 Radar and Remote Sensing Lecture 2: The Radar Range Equation

Range Dependent Turbulence Characterization by Co-operating Coherent Doppler Lidar with Direct Detection Lidar

Chapter 5 Small-Scale Fading and Multipath. School of Information Science and Engineering, SDU

Pulse Compression. Since each part of the pulse has unique frequency, the returns can be completely separated.

Radar Systems Engineering Lecture 12 Clutter Rejection

Introduction to Radar Systems. The Radar Equation. MIT Lincoln Laboratory _P_1Y.ppt ODonnell

Space Debris Measurements using the Advanced Modular Incoherent Scatter Radar. Michael J Nicolls SRI International, Center for Geospace Studies

Observations of Mesosphere Summer Echoes with calibrated VHF radars at latitudes between 54 N and 69 N in summer 2004

2.1 BASIC CONCEPTS Basic Operations on Signals Time Shifting. Figure 2.2 Time shifting of a signal. Time Reversal.

UNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?

Subsystems of Radar and Signal Processing and ST Radar

RADAR is the acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging. The. radar invention has its roots in the pioneering research during

ESCI Cloud Physics and Precipitation Processes Lesson 10 - Weather Radar Dr. DeCaria

Space-Time Adaptive Processing Using Sparse Arrays

Principles of Modern Radar

Impact of the low latitude ionosphere disturbances on GNSS studied with a three-dimensional ionosphere model

Fundamental Concepts of Radar

Set No.1. Code No: R

Target Echo Information Extraction

Lecture 2 Review of Signals and Systems: Part 1. EE4900/EE6720 Digital Communications

Telecommunication Systems February 14 th, 2019

Enhanced incoherent scatter plasma lines

A bluffer s guide to Radar

ECE 583 Lectures 15 RADAR History and Basics

NEXT-GENERATION ACOUSTIC WIND PROFILERS

Radar observables: Target range Target angles (azimuth & elevation) Target size (radar cross section) Target speed (Doppler) Target features (imaging)

Problems from the 3 rd edition

METR 3223, Physical Meteorology II: Radar Doppler Velocity Estimation

Ocean SAR altimetry. from SIRAL2 on CryoSat2 to Poseidon-4 on Jason-CS

Bistatic Radar Receiver for CubeSats: The RAX Payload

MST Radar Technique and Signal Processing

DOPPLER RADAR. Doppler Velocities - The Doppler shift. if φ 0 = 0, then φ = 4π. where

THE NATURE OF GROUND CLUTTER AFFECTING RADAR PERFORMANCE MOHAMMED J. AL SUMIADAEE

EISCAT Experiments. Anders Tjulin EISCAT Scientific Association 2nd March 2017

A new incoherent scatter technique in the EISCAT Svalbard Radar

The Radio Channel. COS 463: Wireless Networks Lecture 14 Kyle Jamieson. [Parts adapted from I. Darwazeh, A. Goldsmith, T. Rappaport, P.

A Bistatic HF Radar for Current Mapping and Robust Ship Tracking

Transcription:

Introduction to Ionospheric Radar Remote Sensing John D Sahr Department of Electrical Engineering University of Washington CEDAR 2006 huge thanks to NSF for their support

outline What is radar? Why use radar to study the ionosphere? What are the basics of ionospheric radar techniques?

What is radar? a mature acronym (lower case!) for RAdio Detection And Ranging the name of a class of technologies for remotely sensing point targets (like airplanes) and volume targets (like weather) by analyzing the scatter of radio wave illumination

Why use radar? as an alternative to in situ measurements (point vs. volume average) to probe particular parameters for very long observations over a fixed point on the Earth s surface

High Altitude Radar Applications Incoherent (Thomson) Scatter: ion composition, concentration, temperature, drifts Coherent Scatter (plasma turbulence): plasma physics, and convection tracer, interferometry & imaging MS(L)T scatter (meso-, strato-, lower thermosphere): winds & waves (MLT region very tough for in situ!) Ionosondes (not really discussed here): plasma concentration profiling (bottomside only)

From TIMED mission http://www.timed.jhuapl.edu/www/science/images/00-0318-01large.gif ISR EsF MST E region, Mesopause scatter

Radar Basics Amplitude Information - how easy is it to detect? Spatial Information - where is it, and how big? Time, Frequency Information - how does it change or move?

But what is the scatter from? Bragg Scatter: responsible for coherent and incoherent scatter. λ radar = 2λ scatter Sharp changes in index of refraction: meteor scatter Total Internal Reflection (ionosondes)

The Radar Equation Relates the received signal strength to transmitter power, antennas, distance, and target size Rt Target! Rr P r = P tg t G r λ 2 σ (4π) 3 R 2 t R 2 r Pt Transmitter Pr Receiver

Monostatic Radar For many radars, the transmitter and receiver share one antenna. Such radars are said to be monostatic. Almost all ionospheric radars are monostatic. Target! Simpler radar equation: only G, R R P r = P tg 2 λ 2 σ (4π) 3 R 4 Pt Transmitter and Receiver Pr

Signal to Noise Ratio The Received power Pr can seem very small... but is it? Compare the received power to competing signals: environmental signals/sky noise system noise clutter -- unwanted signals from our transmitter jamming -- other transmitters

Signal to Noise Ratio (2) often lump everything into Tsys note that the clutter power scales with the transmitter power Pt mitigation by quieter electronics, low antenna sidelobes, careful bandwidth control, and appropriate waveforms P n = k B T sys B + k B T sky B + αp t + P j

What about the target? The target size to detect σ tells you how easy it is Has units of area (bistatic radar cross section) (N.B. Physics definition of differential cross section is scaled per steradian ) Many ionospheric targets are volume scatterers...

Scattering Cross Section How much target do you see (monostatic)? ΔR Antenna Beam Shape R Ω Range Resolution Volume Scattering Cross Section σ v has area/ volume units V = ΩR 2 R G = 4π λ 2 A = 4π Ω

Radar Equation for Volume Targets P r = P taσ v R 4πR 2 Signal proportional to Megawatt-Hectares Signal proportional to range resolution Signal inversely proportional to R^2 (not R^4)... However some targets are inverse R^3, R^4, or R^8 (!)

Rough Comparison... Instrument approx Pt A (MW Hectares) Tsys+sky (K) Arecibo 10 100 JRO 10 20,000 MH 0.3 100 Sondrestrom 0.1 100 AMISR 0.3 300 (?) EISCAT UHF 0.1 100 EISCAT Svalbard 0.2 100 MU 0.8 10,000 MRR 0.0001 2000

Incoherent Scatter Target For an F peak ionization (1E12 per cubic meter), and At a slant range of 500 km, and And a range resolution of 1 km, and For a Millstone Hill-like transmitter + antenna... the scattering cross section is about the size of a pencil eraser

Range Estimation Range is estimated from time of flight speed of light = 3 x 10^8 m/s speed of radar = 1.5 x 10^8 m/s... or 150 km/ms The E region is 1 ms away The F region is 3 ms away The Plasmasphere is 10 ms away

The scattered signal target interrogated in space-time antenna signal y(t) is further processed... Range s(t,r) s(t - cr, r) y(t) = r s(t cr, r)x(t 2cr) dr x(t) Transmit y(t) Time Antenna signal

Range Resolution The antenna signal y(t) is passed through the impulse response of the receiver h(t) If the scatterer is a point target, then the final receiver output z(t) is the convolution of y(t) and h(t) z(t) = τ y(t τ)h(τ) dτ

Range-Time Diagram Range Resolution for a simple, matched pulse h(t) = x*(t) is triangular weighting of possible ranges Range Time Transmit Receive Transmitters look forward in time receivers look backward

Radar Postulates Volume independence: The signal scattered from different places is statistically independent (true down to a few meters) Stationarity: The signal scattered from a particular place is statistically stationary (true down to a few seconds; perhaps a few minutes) s( r 1, t 1 )s ( r 2, t 2 ) = R(t 1 t 2 ; r 1 ) δ( r 1 r 2 ) statistically stationary means that the statistics are not a function of time, not that the process is constant

Range Ambiguity Radar Pulses need to be far enough apart so that that all the signal has returned before the next pulse goes out: Range sample receivers here sample receivers here Time

Range Ambiguity If the radar pulses are too close together, then signals from different ranges will show up in the receiver at the same time: Range Time Note that the transmitter buries some received signals

Target Bandwidth The target amplitude fluctuates due to target turbulence. The target amplitude fluctuates due to mean motion (Doppler Shift) e j[ωt k(r 0+vt)] e j[(ω kv)t kr 0] Ω = kv = 2π v λ one way f = 2 v λ two way

Time Series Analysis First Spectrum Estimation Idea: Periodogram: Time Series, Window, FFT, square, average. Range Time

Periodogram Works fine when you can sample at or above the Nyquist Rate Doesn t work when you cannot sample at the Nyquist Rate! (Overspread) (May be too much work if the target evolves slowly. (Strongly Underspread))

Overspread Targets For a target with total bandwidth B, you must IQ sample at a rate F exceeding B. For a target which could be as far away as Rmax, the radar pulses must be at least 2 Rmax/c apart.

Overspread Targets Competition between Distance and Bandwidth c B < F < 2R max Range B 2R max c < 1 Time P(f) Doppler Spectrum T min = 1/F max B Nyquist = F min

Overspread Targets 450 MHz incoherent scatter: B 2R_max/c = (40 khz)(10 ms) = 400 >> 1 overspread 50 MHz auroral scatter: B 2R_max/c = (1 khz)(6 ms) = 6 > 1 overspread 50 MHz PMSE: B 2R_max/c = (10 Hz)(1 ms) = 1/100 << 1 underspread

Overspread Targets You can either get the slant range right and get the spectrum wrong (by undersampling), or You can get the spectrum right (from several ranges) but get the range wrong. Hmmm.

Weiner-Khinchine Theorem or... you could remember that the autocorrelation function R( τ) and the power spectrum P(f) are a Fourier Transform pair R(τ) = exp(j2πfτ)p (f) df Idea: estimate the Autocorrelation Function first

ACF estimation Assemble sums of immediate products Handle range clutter by relying upon Radar Postulates. Double Pulse; MultiPulse; Alternating Codes; Coded Long Pulse... lovely and intricate waveforms. Probably the best possible waveforms are now known (!)

The Double Pulse Immediately multiply samples y2 and y1* Accumulate similar products rb r0 ra Range Behold! an unbiased estimate of R( τ) for r0 only!! y1! y2 Time

(Interferometry) Interferometry works the same way in space as multipulse codes work in time. Collect estimates of target angular correlation function Then Fourier-like Transformation back to real image (i.e. power spectrum) Statistical Inverse Theory...

MRR interferometry Range Doppler Range Azimuth Image from Melissa Meyer

Pulse Compression Consider 1 MW ISR transmitter looking straight up; 3000 km pulse spacing (20 ms between pulses). Want 600 m range resolution (pulse length = 0.004 ms) Average Transmitter power is Pave = (1 MW)(0.004 ms)/(20 ms) = 200 W 200 Lousy Watts from a 1 MW Transmitter!

Pulse Compression Q: Can we make a long, low amplitude TX pulse look like a short, high amplitude TX pulse? A: Yes, by using special waveforms with nice correlation properties. Remember: resolution is from TX waveform convolved with RX impulse response.

Barker Codes Binary Sequences with almost perfect range sidelobes Exist for length 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 7, 11, 13 only They look like chirps Long pretty good codes can be found Barker 5

Pulse Compression For low ambiguity targets complementary codes have perfect (zero) sidelobes. Modern practice includes sampling the TX waveform as well, to account for its imperfections: amplitude droop, chirp. Extremely interesting stuff!

Random Codes Q: What waveforms have an autocorrelation function that looks like an impulse? A1: the impulse function A2: white noise Long, random waveforms achieve very good pulse compression!

Random Codes Developed by Hagfors (radar astronomy) and Sulzer (Thomson Scatter). Performance quite similar to Alternating Codes (Lehtinen et al) but (IMHO) Random Codes are easier to understand. 100% duty cycle sort of random codes used in FM passive radar.

Passive Radar FM broadcasts (100 MHz) have high average power (about 50 kw) FM broadcasts (usually) behave like band limited white noise, with bandwidth about 100 khz, an autocorrelation time of about 0.01 ms, for an effective range resolution of 1.5 km.

Power Spectrum in Passive Radar MRR data from Melissa Meyer E Region Turbulent Scatter 96.5 MHz

High Latitude E Region Turbulence +1500 m/s 29 October 2003 Mt Rainier Auroral scatter -1500 m/s 300 km 600 km 900 km 1200 km A 10 second average over 800 ranges, each of 1.5 km resolution, Doppler resolution of 12 m/s; 96.5 MHz (Rock and Roll) see http://rrsl.ee.washington.edu/data

In Phase/Quadrature Complex valued time series? Yep! Preserves the sign of the Doppler Shift Halves the Nyquist Sampling Rate (but doesn t halve the number of samples!) A bit of an analytic advantage with Isserliss Theorem <xy*zw*> = <xy*><zw*> + <xw*><zy*>

IQ Receiver Basically, multiply received signal by complex exponential, and preserve real and imaginary parts as separate signals. All digital receivers work this way. Low Pass I(t) y(t) cos(! t) -sin(! t) I(t) + jq(t) Low Pass Q(t)

Thanks! Sondre Stromfjord Jicamarca Arecibo and thanks NSF! Millstone Hill