Audio Applications for Op-Amps, Part III By Bruce Carter Advanced Analog Products, Op Amp Applications Texas Instruments Incorporated

Similar documents
An audio circuit collection, Part 3

Active Filter Design Techniques

INTRODUCTION TO FILTER CIRCUITS

An active filter offers the following advantages over a passive filter:

EE301 ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS

Each question is worth 4 points. ST07 One-hour Quiz #2 1 3/20/2007

EXPERIMENT 1: Characteristics of Passive and Active Filters

Lecture 17 Date: Parallel Resonance Active and Passive Filters

Introduction (cont )

A.C. FILTER NETWORKS. Learning Objectives

Operational Amplifiers

Assist Lecturer: Marwa Maki. Active Filters

Lesson number one. Operational Amplifier Basics

An active filters means using amplifiers to improve the filter. An acive second-order RC low-pass filter still has two RC components in series.

Digital Potentiometers Selection Guides Don t Tell the Whole Story

AN-1098 APPLICATION NOTE

New Technique Accurately Measures Low-Frequency Distortion To <-130 dbc Levels by Xavier Ramus, Applications Engineer, Texas Instruments Incorporated

Chapter 19. Basic Filters

Analog Design-filters

Butterworth Active Bandpass Filter using Sallen-Key Topology

Low Pass Filter Introduction

CHARACTERIZATION OF OP-AMP

Active Filters - Revisited

Testing and Stabilizing Feedback Loops in Today s Power Supplies

Homework Assignment 03

1) Consider the circuit shown in figure below. Compute the output waveform for an input of 5kHz

Special-Purpose Operational Amplifier Circuits

Gechstudentszone.wordpress.com

Chapter 4: AC Circuits and Passive Filters

Application Note 4. Analog Audio Passive Crossover

Electrical Circuits II (ECE233b)

Chapter 15: Active Filters

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

Week 8 AM Modulation and the AM Receiver

Lecture 8: More on Operational Amplifiers (Op Amps)

Lab 4: Analysis of the Stereo Amplifier

Laboratory 9. Required Components: Objectives. Optional Components: Operational Amplifier Circuits (modified from lab text by Alciatore)

Basic Information of Operational Amplifiers

Summer 2015 Examination

Operational Amplifier

ELC224 Final Review (12/10/2009) Name:

Op-Amp Simulation Part II

Homework Assignment 01

EK307 Active Filters and Steady State Frequency Response

Frequency Responses and Active Filter Circuits

Assignment 11. 1) Using the LM741 op-amp IC a circuit is designed as shown, then find the output waveform for an input of 5kHz

OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER PREPARED BY, PROF. CHIRAG H. RAVAL ASSISTANT PROFESSOR NIRMA UNIVRSITY

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

FREQUENCY RESPONSE AND PASSIVE FILTERS LABORATORY

UNIT I. Operational Amplifiers

CHAPTER 14. Introduction to Frequency Selective Circuits

APPLICATION NOTE 6206 SIMPLE, EFFECTIVE METHOD AND CIRCUIT TO MEASURE VERY-LOW 1/F VOLTAGE REFERENCE NOISE (< 1ΜV P-P, 0.

Lab 9: Operational amplifiers II (version 1.5)

The New England Radio Discussion Society electronics course (Phase 4, cont d) The versatile op-amp

Infrared Communications Lab

Analog Electronic Circuits Code: EE-305-F

Bipolar Emitter-Follower: Output Pin Compensation

Microprocessor based process control

LINEAR IC APPLICATIONS

Filter Design, Active Filters & Review. EGR 220, Chapter 14.7, December 14, 2017

Chapter 2. The Fundamentals of Electronics: A Review

Electric Circuit Theory

Fundamentals of Active Filters

Operational Amplifiers

Constant Current Control for DC-DC Converters

Laboratory 6. Lab 6. Operational Amplifier Circuits. Required Components: op amp 2 1k resistor 4 10k resistors 1 100k resistor 1 0.

Input Filter Design for Switching Power Supplies Michele Sclocchi Application Engineer National Semiconductor

University of Pittsburgh

Chapter 2. Operational Amplifiers

Example #6 1. An amplifier with a nominal gain

Keywords: volume control, digital potentiometer, docking station, mute, stereo separation, MAX5486

Homework Assignment 04

High-Performance Audio Applications of The LM833

Core Technology Group Application Note 6 AN-6

L02 Operational Amplifiers Applications 1

Test Your Understanding

AS Electronics Project: 3-Channel Sound-to-Light Display

Project 2. Project 2: audio equalizer. Fig. 1: Kinter MA-170 stereo amplifier with bass and treble controls.

OBSOLETE. Low Cost Quad Voltage Controlled Amplifier SSM2164 REV. 0

FSK DEMODULATOR / TONE DECODER

Scheme I Sample Question Paper

Chapter 12 RF and AF Filters

ECE3204 D2015 Lab 1. See suggested breadboard configuration on following page!

ECEN 325 Lab 5: Operational Amplifiers Part III

LM W Audio Power Amplifier with Shutdown Mode

Homework Assignment 03

Operational Amplifiers (Op Amps)

Designing Information Devices and Systems II Fall 2018 Elad Alon and Miki Lustig Homework 4

EXPERIMENT 2.2 NON-LINEAR OP-AMP CIRCUITS

Tapped Inductor Bandpass Filter Design. High Speed Signal Path Applications 7/21/2009 v1.6

Concepts to be Reviewed

Electronic PRINCIPLES

Input Filter Design for Switching Power Supplies: Written by Michele Sclocchi Application Engineer, National Semiconductor

Introduction to Op Amps By Russell Anderson, Burr-Brown Corp

"Improve Instrument Amplifier Performance with X2Y Optimized Input Filter"

Laboratory 4 Operational Amplifier Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, San Diego MAE170

Analog Circuits. Operational Amplifiers (Opamps) DC Power Supplies Oscillators

For the filter shown (suitable for bandpass audio use) with bandwidth B and center frequency f, and gain A:

Chapter 4. Single-Supply Op Amp Design Techniques. Excerpted from Op Amps for Everyone. Literature Number SLOA076. Literature Number: SLOD006A

[Q] DEFINE AUDIO AMPLIFIER. STATE ITS TYPE. DRAW ITS FREQUENCY RESPONSE CURVE.

Transcription:

Audio Applications for OpAmps, Part III By Bruce Carter Advanced Analog Products, Op Amp Applications Texas Instruments Incorporated This is the third in a series of articles on singlesupply audio circuits. The reader is encouraged to review the introductory material in the first article which concentrated on lowpass and highpass filters. The second article concentrated on audio notch filter applications and curvefitting filters. This last article focuses on the use of a simulated inductor as an audiocircuit element. The Simulated Inductor Vcc C1 Vin1 R2 Vcc/2 Fig. 1: A Simulated Inductor Circuit A simulated inductor circuit (see Fig. 1) reverses the operation of a capacitor an inductor resists any change in its current, so when a dc voltage is applied to an inductance, the current rises slowly, and the voltage falls as the external resistance becomes more significant. In practice it is a little different: The fact that one side of the inductor is grounded precludes its use in lowpass and notch filters, leaving only highpass and bandpass filters as possible applications. High Pass Filter Vin C1 Rs R5 Fig. 2: HighPass Filter Using A Simulated Inductor 1

Analyzing the response of this highpass filter (Fig. 2) shows disappointing results: Fig. 3: Response Of Simulated Inductor HighPass Filter Various values of Rs were tried but 220 Ω to 470 Ω were the only ones that gave something close to the expected response. Values of 220 Ω and 100 Ω offered the most rejection, but there is an annoying highfrequency rolloff that first shows up at 330 Ω and becomes quite pronounced at 100 Ω. Values of 470 Ω and above have washed out stopband rejection but at least have flat highfrequency response. The value of Rs that gives the most inductive response is 330 Ω although it rolls off slightly more than 3 db at 1kHz and is not 20 db down a decade away. If highfrequency rolloff is not desirable 470 Ω can be used, but the maximum attenuation will only be about 15 db. So, a highpass filter constructed from a simulated inductor has poor performance and is not practical leaving only bandpass filters as potential applications. Bandpass Filters And Graphic Equalizers An Rs value of 220 Ω to 470 Ω is relatively high, meaning that only relatively low Q bandpass filters can be constructed with simulated inductors. But there is an application that can use low Q bandpass filters: Graphic equalizers. Graphic equalizers are used to compensate for irregularities in a listening environment, or to tailor audio to a listener s preferences; they are commonly available as dualoctave (5 bands) or singleoctave (10 or 11 bands) while professional sound reinforcement systems use ⅓octave equalizers (about 30 bands.) [For the nonmusically inclined, an octave is a repeating pattern of pitch used in musical scales. To the ear a tone played at any given frequency has the same pitch as a tone at half or double that frequency, except for any obvious difference in frequency. Western cultures have octaves (8 notes) while, correspondingly, Eastern cultures use pentatonic (5 note) scales.]

The center frequencies for a ⅓octave equalizer are not equally spaced as the human ear hears pitch logarithmically, and so the center frequencies must be determined by using the cube root of 2 (1.26). (The center frequencies are listed in Appendix A.) Graphic equalizers do not have to be constructed on octave intervals and any set of center frequencies can be used. Musical content, however, tends to stay within octaves so graphic equalizers that do not follow the octave scale may produce objectionable level shifts when artists play or sing different notes within the octave. One of the latest trends is to compensate for the poor audio response in small systems by moving the high and lowfrequency settings in from the extremes and placing the equalization frequencies at 100, 300, 1000, 3000, and 10000 Hz. It looks nicer on the front panel and makes more efficient use of the limited capabilities of such systems although musically incorrect. Two strategies can be used to create graphic equalizers: the simulated inductor method (being described here) and the MFB (multiple feedback) bandpass filter method (see Ref. 1.) (Construction of MFB filters can be done on TI s Filter Design Database see Ref. 3.) Building The Equalizer Vin Vin R2 R2 C2 R3 C2 R3 Rs C1 R4=Rs L R5 Fig. 4: Graphic Equalizer (Physical Inductor On Left, Simulated Inductor On Right) A graphic equalizer can be built with a physical inductor (Fig. 4, left) but obtaining inductors of the correct values would be difficult and it is much easier to use the simulated inductor implementation (Fig. 4, right.) Rs is the equivalent series resistance of the inductor and capacitor and in the simulated inductor version it is approximately equal to R4 (which does not include a negligible contribution from capacitor C2.) Gain of the Equalizer Starting with Rs 470 Ω the gain of the circuit can now be calculated, but that value constrains the input and feedback resistor of the graphic equalizer stage. Several sources use a gain of 17dB but this will only appear when the surrounding stages are also adjusted to their maximum level. Otherwise, gain at the resonant stage will experience rolloff from adjacent stages according to their proximity and Q.

The potentiometer (Fig. 4, again) is connected across the inverting and noninverting inputs of the opamp, and is in parallel with the differential input resistance. It does not, therefore, enter into the gain calculations for the op amp stage, but Rs does. We need to look at the equivalent circuits of Fig. 4 with the potentiometer at each end of its travel is. Vin Rs R3 Vin R3 Rs Fig. 5: Gain Circuit at Either End of Potentiometer Travel The top circuit (in Fig. 5) acts like a unitygain buffer, with a voltage divider on the input voltage. The gain will be at its minimum value of 17 db (1/7). For Rs = 470 Ω, can be calculated: = (Rs A) Rs = (470 * 7) 470 = 2820 Ω The bottom circuit acts like a noninverting gain stage, with the input resistance being ignored. The gain will be at its maximum value of 17 db (7). For Rs = 470 Ω, the feedback resistor R3 is: R3 = Rs( A 1) = 470Ω ( 7 1) = 2820Ω This is the same value, which simplifies design, and a standard E6 value of 3.3 kω is selected for both because the absolute value of gain is unimportant. Potentiometer Action The gain at positions in between the ends of the potentiometer wiper is more difficult to calculate. It will combine both noninverting and inverting gains and although, superficially, the circuit looks like a differential amplifier stage, the resistor values are not balanced for differential operation. This leads to an unusual taper for the potentiometer. At one value of potentiometer resistance, in this case 20 kω, has a ½ gain/loss at the 5% and 95% settings, respectively. This then requires a potentiometer with two logarithmic (audio) tapers joined in the center nonstandard and hard to obtain.

A partial solution to this is to reduce the potentiometer s value, and at 10 kω the logarithmic effects are lessened. Reducing the potentiometer s value to 5 kω results in less improvement and starts to limit the bandwidth of the op amp. 10 kω is probably the best compromise. R6 100 kω Vin C3 10 µf R7 100 kω 3.3 kω C4 VCC/2 R2 10 kω R3 10 µf C2 3.3 kω C1 R4 R5 VCC/2 STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE N1 STAGE N Fig. 6: Graphic Equalizer Schematic In the schematic of the equalizer (see Fig. 6) C3 and C4 ac couple the input and output, respectively. The first stage is an inverting unitygain buffer that ensure drive to a large number of stages, and it also allows easy injection of the half supply voltage to the equalization stages. The equalization stages are shown in the dotted lines. R5 is selected to be 100 kω but there may be some slight variation of R4 and R5 values to make capacitor values reasonable. The component values of the equalization stages are given in Appendix A.

Q Factor At this point, the designer needs to know the Q, which is based on how many bands the equalizer will have and will determine the bandwidth of a bandpass filter. Different references suggest different values of Q based on the ripple that is tolerable when all the controls are set at their maximum or minimum values. This ripple is not desirable if an enduser is adjusting all the controls to maximum, they need a preamplifier, not an equalizer. Nevertheless, the maximum and minimum positions provide a good way to demonstrate the response capability of the unit. Ref. 2 recommends a Q of 1.7 for an octave equalizer which gives a ripple of 2.5 db, reasonable for this type of device. Extrapolating, the Q of a twooctave equalizer should then be 0.85, and that of a ⅓ octave equalizer should be 5.1. Fig. 7: Effect Of Q On Bandwidth In A Graphic Equalizer A filter with a Q of 1.7 (middle curve of Fig.7) will have a bandwidth that is 1/1.7, (or 0.588 of the center frequency) so the 1000 Hz filter shown has a bandwidth of 588 Hz. The 3 db points, therefore, would be logarithmically equidistant from the center peak at 1 khz, at approximately 750 Hz and 1350Hz. Beyond the 3dB points the response of the filter flattens out to a firstorder response of 6 db per octave, eventually flattening to a limiting value. Increasing the Q does nothing to change this, as can be seen. What increasing the Q accomplishes is to narrow the 3 db bandwidth.

Capacitor Values The relationships that are known at this point are: Inductive Reactance: X L = 2π f o L X L Definition of Q: Q = where R is R4 R 1 Resonant Frequency Calculation: f o =, where C is C2 2π LC Formula for simulated inductor: L = ( R5 R4) R4 C1 After deriving the following from the expressions above, the value of C1 and C2 can now be determined in terms of f o, R4, and R5: Q R4 C1 = 2 π f o ( R5 R4) 1 C2 = 2 π f R4 o The values of C1 and C2 for each value of frequency are shown in Appendix A. Response The response curves for equalizers with potentiometers at each extreme are shown below. Fig. 8: Frequency Response Of A 2Octave Equalizer

Fig. 9: Frequency Response Of A Pseudo 2 Octave Equalizer Fig. 10: Frequency Response Of A 1Octave Equalizer

Fig. 11: Frequency Response Of A ⅓Octave Equalizer Appendix A Component Values For Graphic Equalizers Use standard E24 capacitor values nearest to the value calculated in the tables. Component values for a 2octave equalizer: Freq R5 R4 Q L C1 C2 60 100000 510 0.85 1.150 2.3E08 6.1E06 250 100000 470 0.85 0.254 5.4E09 1.6E06 1000 100000 470 0.85 0.064 1.4E09 4.0E07 4000 100000 470 0.85 0.016 3.4E10 1.0E07 16000 100000 470 0.85 0.004 8.5E11 2.5E08 Component values for a pseudo 2octave equalizer: Freq R5 R4 Q L C1 C2 100 100000 470 1 0.748 1.6E08 3.4E06 300 100000 470 1 0.249 5.3E09 1.1E06 1000 100000 470 1 0.075 1.6E09 3.4E07 3000 100000 470 1 0.025 5.3E10 1.1E07 10000 100000 470 1 0.007 1.6E10 3.4E08

Component Values for a 1 Octave Equalizer: Freq R5 R4 Q L C1 C2 16 110000 470 1.7 7.948 1.5E07 1.2E05 31 110000 470 1.7 4.102 8.0E08 6.4E06 63 100000 470 1.7 2.018 4.3E08 3.2E06 125 100000 470 1.7 1.017 2.2E08 1.6E06 250 100000 470 1.7 0.509 1.1E08 8.0E07 500 100000 470 1.7 0.254 5.4E09 4.0E07 1000 100000 470 1.7 0.127 2.7E09 2.0E07 2000 100000 470 1.7 0.064 1.4E09 1.0E07 4000 100000 470 1.7 0.032 6.8E10 5.0E08 8000 100000 470 1.7 0.016 3.4E10 2.5E08 16000 100000 470 1.7 0.008 1.7E10 1.2E08

Component values for a ⅓octave equalizer: Freq R5 R4 Q L C1 C2 16 100000 499 5.1 25.315 5.1E07 3.9E06 20 105000 475 5.1 19.278 3.9E07 3.3E06 25 100000 511 5.1 16.591 3.3E07 2.4E06 31 97600 499 5.1 13.066 2.7E07 2.0E06 40 100000 499 5.1 10.126 2.0E07 1.6E06 50 100000 499 5.1 8.101 1.6E07 1.3E06 63 100000 487 5.1 6.274 1.3E07 1.0E06 80 100000 511 5.1 5.185 1.0E07 7.6E07 100 100000 499 5.1 4.050 8.2E08 6.3E07 125 105000 487 5.1 3.162 6.2E08 5.1E07 160 100000 499 5.1 2.531 5.1E08 3.9E07 200 105000 475 5.1 1.928 3.9E08 3.3E07 250 100000 511 5.1 1.659 3.3E08 2.4E07 315 97600 499 5.1 1.286 2.7E08 2.0E07 400 100000 499 5.1 1.013 2.0E08 1.6E07 500 100000 499 5.1 0.810 1.6E08 1.3E07 630 100000 487 5.1 0.627 1.3E08 1.0E07 800 100000 475 5.1 0.482 1.0E08 8.2E08 1000 100000 499 5.1 0.405 8.2E09 6.3E08 1200 100000 511 5.1 0.346 6.8E09 5.1E08 1600 100000 499 5.1 0.253 5.1E09 3.9E08 2000 105000 475 5.1 0.193 3.9E09 3.3E08 2500 100000 511 5.1 0.166 3.3E09 2.4E08 3200 105000 499 5.1 0.127 2.4E09 2.0E08 4000 100000 499 5.1 0.101 2.0E09 1.6E08 5000 100000 499 5.1 0.081 1.6E09 1.3E08 6300 100000 487 5.1 0.063 1.3E09 1.0E08 8000 100000 475 5.1 0.048 1.0E09 8.2E09 10000 100000 499 5.1 0.041 8.2E10 6.3E09 12000 100000 511 5.1 0.035 6.8E10 5.1E09 16000 100000 499 5.1 0.025 5.1E10 3.9E09 20000 105000 475 5.1 0.019 3.9E10 3.3E09 Some ⅓octave equalizers omit the 16 and 20Hz bands; others omit the 20kHz band. The frequencies are so close that 1% resistors are mandatory for this design. References: 1. Elliot Sound Products, Projects 28 and 64, http://sound.au.com 2. Audio/Radio Handbook, National Semiconductor, 1980. Scanned copies of the pages for a basic 3band audio equalizer and a multiband octave audio equalizer from this text can be found at http://www.wavefront.mcmail.com/scans.htm 3. Additional resource: Using the Texas Instruments Filter Design Database, By Bruce Carter, Texas Instruments Incorporated.