Link Budgets International Committee on GNSS Working Group A Torino, Italy 19 October 2010

Similar documents
Exploiting Link Dynamics in LEO-to-Ground Communications

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

SATELLITE LINK DESIGN

Chapter 4 The RF Link

High Speed Data Downlink for NSF Space Weather CubeSats

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.1628

Recommendation ITU-R SA (07/2017)

Adapted from Dr. Joe Montana (George mason University) Dr. James

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SF.1719

Reverse Engineering the GPS and Galileo Transmit Antenna Side Lobes. SCPNT Symposium November 11, Shankar Ramakrishnan Advisor: Per Enge

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Study of Factors which affect the Calculation of Co- Channel Interference in a Radio Link

Potential interference from spaceborne active sensors into radionavigation-satellite service receivers in the MHz band

Noise and Interference Limited Systems

ECC Recommendation (16)04

Space Frequency Coordination Group

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1341*

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1257

1. Discuss in detail the Design Consideration of a Satellite Communication Systems. [16]

Narrow- and wideband channels

CubeSat Communications Review and Concepts. Workshop, July 2, 2009

EEM.Ant. Antennas and Propagation

DRONACHARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, GREATER NOIDA. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (EEC 021) QUESTION BANK

Earth-Stations. Performance Requirements

FIGURE 14-1 (a) Focal points F1 and F2, semimajor axis a, and semiminor b of an ellipse; (b) Kepler s second law

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SF.1320

Recommendation ITU-R M (09/2015)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1340 *,**

Unit 3 - Wireless Propagation and Cellular Concepts

Frequency sharing between SRS and FSS (space-to-earth) systems in the GHz band

Earth Station Coordination

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1639 *

Vertical or horizontal antenna for limited space

Written Exam Channel Modeling for Wireless Communications - ETIN10

Final Examination. 22 April 2013, 9:30 12:00. Examiner: Prof. Sean V. Hum. All non-programmable electronic calculators are allowed.

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band GHz

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BO.1834*

SECTION 2 BROADBAND RF CHARACTERISTICS. 2.1 Frequency bands

Satellite Link Budget 6/10/5244-1

IEEE c-01/19. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Narrow- and wideband channels

Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band MHz

Characteristics and protection criteria for non-geostationary mobile-satellite service systems operating in the band

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1654 *

Chapter 3 Solution to Problems

Information on the Evaluation of VHF and UHF Terrestrial Cross-Border Frequency Coordination Requests

Report on DME interference on GPS/L5 (third version, July 99)

Satellite Navigation Principle and performance of GPS receivers

Recommendation ITU-R F (05/2011)

ARTICLE 22. Space services 1

Recommendation ITU-R SF.1843 (10/2007)

Guidelines for efficient use of the band GHz by the Earth explorationsatellite service (space-to-earth)

COMPATIBILITY STUDY BETWEEN RADIO NAVIGATION SATELLITE SERVICE IN THE MHz BAND AND FIXED SERVICE OPERATING UNDER RR S5.355 AND S5.

# DEFINITIONS TERMS. 2) Electrical energy that has escaped into free space. Electromagnetic wave

Antennas and Propagation

Recommendation ITU-R M (06/2005)

UNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?

Benefits of amulti-gnss Receiver inaninterference Environment

ETSI TS V1.3.1 ( )

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Antennas and Propagation

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Recommendation ITU-R SF.1485 (05/2000)

Radio Propagation Fundamentals

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJECET)

Miniaturized GPS Antenna Array Technology and Predicted Anti-Jam Performance

Outlines. Attenuation due to Atmospheric Gases Rain attenuation Depolarization Scintillations Effect. Introduction

CHAPTER 2 DETAILS RELATING TO THE CONTENTS OF THE COLUMNS OF PART I-S AND OF SPECIAL SECTIONS AR11/C AND RES33/C OF THE WEEKLY CIRCULAR

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1652 *

Opportunistic Vehicular Networks by Satellite Links for Safety Applications

Propagation mechanisms

November 24, 2010xx. Introduction

Antennas Orbits Modulation Noise Link Budgets U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Spacecraft Communications MARYLAND. Principles of Space Systems Design

SRSP-101 Issue 1 May Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.524-6

Annex 5. Determination of the interference field strength in the Land Mobile Service

Noise and Propagation mechanisms

Power Control for Commercial Satellites Using Radar Data

ICG WG-B Achievements on Interoperable GNSS Space Service Volume (SSV) November, 2016 Sochi, Russian Federation

European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Technical characteristics and protection criteria for aeronautical mobile service systems in the frequency range GHz

Satellite TVRO G/T calculations

Worst-Case GPS Constellation for Testing Navigation at Geosynchronous Orbit for GOES-R

Interference Detection and Localisation within GEMS II. Ediz Cetin, Ryan J. R. Thompson and Andrew G. Dempster

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 210/7)

Report ITU-R SA (11/2014)

REPORT ITU-R SA.2098

X band downlink for CubeSat

Polarization. Contents. Polarization. Types of Polarization

SATELLIT COMMUNICATION

Technical Requirements for Fixed Wireless Access Systems Operating in the Band MHz

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 131/7) a) that telecommunications between the Earth and stations in deep space have unique requirements;

SRSP Issue 2 March 3, Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

INTRODUCTION TO RF PROPAGATION

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.1624 *

h max 20 TX Ionosphere d 1649 km Radio and Optical Wave Propagation Prof. L. Luini, July 1 st, 2016 SURNAME AND NAME ID NUMBER SIGNATURE

Transcription:

Link Budgets International Committee on GNSS Working Group A Torino, Italy 19 October 2010 Dr. John Betz, United States

Background Each GNSS signal is a potential source of interference to other GNSS signals A GNSS signal s maximum received power is a critical parameter in quantifying the potential interference from that signal Previously, GPS and other GNSS providers have not always been explicit or consistent in defining the conventions and considerations associated with maximum received power This presentation reflects recent experience, and represents GPS s proposal for the future It would be mutually beneficial for all GNSS providers to adopt explicit (at least) and consistent (preferred) conventions for defining maximum received power 2

Calculating Effective Interference to Reception of a GNSS Signal Desired Signal Receiver Correlator Effective Interference 3

Calculating Effective Interference to Reception of a GNSS Signal Desired Signal G agg = Aggregate gain of interference: accounts for constellation, transmit antenna pattern, interference reference antenna Receiver Correlator Effective Interference 4

Calculating Effective Interference to Reception of a GNSS Signal G agg = Aggregate gain of interference: accounts for constellation, transmit antenna pattern, interference reference antenna Desired Signal Receiver Correlator Used to compute Spectral Separation Coefficient (SSC), κ Effective Interference 5

Calculating Effective Interference to Reception of a GNSS Signal C ι,max =Maximum interfering signal received power out of maximum received power reference antenna G agg = Aggregate gain of interference: accounts for constellation, transmit antenna pattern, interference reference antenna Desired Signal Receiver Correlator Used to compute Spectral Separation Coefficient (SSC), κ Effective Interference = C ι,max x G agg x κ 6

Calculating Effective Interference to Reception of a GNSS Signal C ι,max =Maximum interfering signal received power out of maximum received power reference antenna G agg = Aggregate gain of interference: accounts for constellation, transmit antenna pattern, interference reference antenna Desired Signal Receiver Correlator Used to compute Spectral Separation Coefficient (SSC), κ Effective Interference = C ι,max x G agg x κ Aggregate effective interference = Σ (eff. interference from different signal types) 7

Maximum Received Power Link Budget Factors RF transmit power Transmit antenna gain toward receive antenna Free space propagation loss at a given angle off nadir Minimum possible atmospheric loss maximizes received power Minimum possible polarization loss maximizes received power Gain of maximum received power reference antenna Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) (C ι,max ) dbw = Max {(RF transmit power) dbw + (Transmit antenna gain) db (Free space propagation loss) db (Atmospheric loss) db (Polarization loss) db + (Receive antenna gain) db } Compute max over surface of the earth 8

RF Transmit Power RF transmit power must be set so that received power exceeds minimum received power specification everywhere within service volume RF transmit power is independent of angle off nadir In establishing minimum and maximum received power levels, GPS includes operating margin above the theoretical minimum RF transmit power Operating margin allows for RF transmit power set greater than theoretical minimum to allow for various practical factors: Power setting granularity Power measurement uncertainties Delays in adjusting power 9

Transmit Antenna Gains Vary Over Different Azimuth Cuts and Satellites 16 15.5 Mean transmit antenna gain Gain (dbic) 15 14.5 14 13.5 Antenna gains at different azimuth cuts, for different satellites Mean-min variation factor 13 Minimum transmit antenna gain 12.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Angle Off Nadir (Degrees) 10

Transmit Antenna Gain Versus Angle Off Nadir Nominal antenna gain pattern versus angle off nadir are normally provided during bilateral consultations In establishing minimum and maximum received power levels, GPS includes additional RF transmit power to account for variations in transmit antenna gain Transmit antenna gain margin allows for RF transmit power set greater than theoretical minimum to allow for variations in transmit antenna gains at different angles off nadir or for different satellites 11

RF Transmit Power Margin GPS typically includes at least 1.5 db of margin in establishing maximum received power levels, for given minimum received power level Operating margin Transmit antenna gain margin 12

Free Space Propagation Loss and Atmospheric Loss Free space propagation loss = (4πr) 2 /λ 2 r = distance from satellite antenna to receive antenna on earth s surface at a given angle off nadir, at perigee if appropriate λ = wavelength Atmospheric loss considerations Oxygen is the dominant source of attenuation at L band Oxygen attenuation approaches 0.035 db (rounding to 0.0 db) for elevation angles exceeding 40 degrees Other phenomena (turbulence, water vapor) may sometimes contribute additional losses, but do not always occur Prudent to let atmospheric loss be 0.0 db for maximum received power link budget Reference: Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Volume 1, Parkinson and Spilker (Eds.), pp. 518-521 13

Proposed Receive Power Reference Antenna Polarization Loss GNSS signals are approximately circularly polarized Specified ellipticities of GPS signals: 1.8 db (IS-GPS-800, IS-GPS-200 L1) 2.2 db (IS-GPS-200 L2, ICD-GPS-700 L2) 2.4 db (IS-GPS-705) Many receive antennas are approximately circularly polarized at higher elevation angles where maximum received power typically occurs Polarization Loss at Worst Orientation into 0 dbic Circularly Polarized Receive Antenna -1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Transmit Antenna Ellipticity (db) Also, aggregate interference results from reception of multiple signals with received polarizations distributed in polarization orientation Prudent to use circularly polarized antenna with polarization loss of 0.0 db for maximum received power link budget Polarization Loss (db) 0.5 0-0.5-1 14

Proposed Receive Power Reference Antenna Gain G agg accounts for interference reference antenna s gain over angle Propose using 0 dbic reference antenna for specifying maximum received power 15

Summary of Proposed Link Budget Conventions for Maximum Received Power Description Value Notes Elevation Angle to Satellite 0 degrees Address all locations on surface of earth Radius of Earth Orbital Radius Atmospheric Loss Transmit Antenna Gain Receive Antenna Gain Receive Antenna Polarization Loss 6378.137 km Circular orbits: mean orbital radius Elliptical orbits: perigee 0 db 0 dbic Free-space path loss calculated based on earth radius and orbital radius Lowest possible loss value, can occur at high elevation angles where max rx power typically occurs Use average value over azimuth for each angle off nadir Many receive antennas are approximately circularly polarized at higher elevation angles where maximum received power typically occurs. Also, interference consists of signals from multiple signals with received polarizations randomly distributed in angle 0 db Lowest possible loss value (C ι,max ) dbw =Max {(RF transmit power) dbw +(Transmit antenna gain) dbic (Free space loss) db 16}

Example for GPS L1C Minimum RF Transmit Power Mean transmit antenna gain Angle Off Nadir (deg) Gain (dbic) 0 13.6 2 13.4 4 13.2 6 13.4 8 14.3 10 15.0 12 15.1 14 14.4 16 12.7 EIRP (dbw) 26 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Angle Off Nadir (Degrees) Minimum RF transmit power needed for specified minimum received power is 14.4 dbw 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 Needed to Deliver -157 dbw Minimum Actual Minimum Provides minimum received power 157 dbw on surface of earth using GPS III antenna pattern and GPS conventions for minimum received 17 power

Example for GPS L1C Maximum Received Power Actual maximum received power calculated using 14.4 dbw RF power and conventions for maximum received power link budget Allows 1.7 db of L1C margin for transmit antenna gain variation and operations GPS uses slightly different margins for signals at different center frequencies, with different transmit antennas, and to accommodate multiple satellite blocks Received Power (dbw) -152-153 -154-155 -156-157 -157 dbw Minimum -152 dbw Maximum Actual Maximum 1.7 db Margin -158 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Elevation Angle (Degrees) 18

Summary Proposed conventions for maximum received power link budgets involve only EIRP and free-space propagation loss If all providers adopt common conventions, all providers numerical values for maximum received power can be interpreted and applied consistently 19