Carrier Phase Multipath Corrections Based on GNSS Signal Quality Measurements to Improve CORS Observations

Similar documents
New Tools for Network RTK Integrity Monitoring

The Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-networks under Solar Maximum Conditions

Detection and Mitigation of Static Multipath in L1 Carrier Phase Measurements Using a Dual- Antenna Approach

The Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-networks under Solar Maximum Conditions

Does GNSS outperform GPS in Geodetic Applications?

Geo++ White Paper. Comparison and Analysis of BLOCK II/IIA Offsets from Antenna Field Calibrations

Performance Evaluation of the Effect of QZS (Quasi-zenith Satellite) on Precise Positioning

ESTIMATION OF IONOSPHERIC DELAY FOR SINGLE AND DUAL FREQUENCY GPS RECEIVERS: A COMPARISON

LOCAL IONOSPHERIC MODELLING OF GPS CODE AND CARRIER PHASE OBSERVATIONS

COMPARISON OF GPS COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE PACKAGES TO PROCESSING STATIC BASELINES UP TO 30 KM

Trimble Business Center:

The Impact of Different GPS Antenna Calibration Models on the EUREF Permanent Network

Ionospheric Disturbance Indices for RTK and Network RTK Positioning

Assessment and Improvement of the Capabilities of a Window Correlator to Model GPS Multipath Phase Errors

Site-specific Multipath Characteristic of GPS ISKANDAR Network

ANALYSIS OF GPS SATELLITE OBSERVABILITY OVER THE INDIAN SOUTHERN REGION

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology

Accurate High-Sensitivity GPS for Short Baselines

MULTIPATH MITIGATION BY WAVELET ANALYSIS FOR GPS BASE STATION APPLICATIONS

A GLONASS Observation Message Compatible With The Compact Measurement Record Format

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS PANEL (NSP) NSP Working Group meetings. Impact of ionospheric effects on SBAS L1 operations. Montreal, Canada, October, 2006

Procedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections.

Real-Time Processing Strategies

Determination of refractivity variations with GNSS and ultra-stable frequency standards

Multipath and Atmospheric Propagation Errors in Offshore Aviation DGPS Positioning

ABSTRACT: Three types of portable units with GNSS raw data recording capability are assessed to determine static and kinematic position accuracy

Asian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 08, Issue, 11, pp , November, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE

Integer Ambiguity Resolution for Precise Point Positioning Patrick Henkel

GNSS multipath detection using three-frequency signal-tonoise

ABSOLUTE CALIBRATION OF TIME RECEIVERS WITH DLR'S GPS/GALILEO HW SIMULATOR

Sidereal Filtering Based on GPS Single Differences for Mitigating Multipath Effects

Assessment of high-rate GPS using a single-axis shake table

Investigation regarding Different Antennas combined with Low-cost GPS Receivers

3D-Map Aided Multipath Mitigation for Urban GNSS Positioning

Phase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered Antenna Array

Performance of Research-Based N-RTK Positioning System in ISKANDAR Malaysia

Application of GNSS Methods for Monitoring Offshore Platform Deformation

Positioning with Single and Dual Frequency Smartphones Running Android 7 or Later

INTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS FROM GPS JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2016 QUARTERLY REPORT

Geo++ GmbH Garbsen Germany

Multipath detection with the combination of SNR measurements Example from urban environment

On multipath characterization through software receivers and ray-tracing

TEST RESULTS OF A HIGH GAIN ADVANCED GPS RECEIVER

Simulation Analysis for Performance Improvements of GNSS-based Positioning in a Road Environment

The Benefits of Three Frequencies for the High Accuracy Positioning

Latest Developments in Network RTK Modeling to Support GNSS Modernization

Effect of Quasi Zenith Satellite (QZS) on GPS Positioning

Demonstrations of Multi-Constellation Advanced RAIM for Vertical Guidance using GPS and GLONASS Signals

The added value of new GNSS to monitor the ionosphere

VARIATION OF STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY USING GPS-SINGLE FREQUENCY OBSERVATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)

Observations of Signal-to-Noise Ratios (SNR) at Geodetic GPS Site CASA: Implications for Phase Multipath

TREATMENT OF DIFFRACTION EFFECTS CAUSED BY MOUNTAIN RIDGES

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) using

HIGH GAIN ADVANCED GPS RECEIVER

Evaluation of L2C Observations and Limitations

Validation of the Laboratory Calibration of Geodetic Antennas based on GPS Measurements

AIRPORT MULTIPATH SIMULATION AND MEASUREMENT TOOL FOR SITING DGPS REFERENCE STATIONS

Absolute Antenna Calibration

GNSS Technologies. PPP and RTK

It is well known that GNSS signals

Satellite Bias Corrections in Geodetic GPS Receivers

What to Expect with the Current Constellation

Experiences with Fugro's Real Time GPS/GLONASS Orbit/Clock Decimeter Level Precise Positioning System

Improved Ambiguity Resolution by an Equatorial Ionospheric Differential Correction for Precise Positioning

UNIT 1 - introduction to GPS

GPS STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY VARIATION WITH OBSERVATION RECORDING INTERVAL FOR HYDROGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)

Assessment of the Accuracy of Processing GPS Static Baselines Up To 40 Km Using Single and Dual Frequency GPS Receivers.

MONITORING SEA LEVEL USING GPS

Satellite Navigation Principle and performance of GPS receivers

NRTK services in Ireland - an Evaluation

SUPPORT OF NETWORK FORMATS BY TRIMBLE GPSNET NETWORK RTK SOLUTION

Signals, and Receivers

Mitigation of GPS Carrier Phase Multipath Effects in Real-Time Kinematic Applications

Assessing & Mitigation of risks on railways operational scenarios

RTK Rover Performance using the Master-Auxiliary Concept

RTK Rover Performance using the Master- Auxiliary Concept

CDAAC Ionospheric Products

Keywords: GPS/GLONASS, Precise Point Positioning, Kinematic, Hydrography

The importance of correct antenna calibration models for the EUREF Permanent Network

Impact of Different Tropospheric Models on GPS Baseline Accuracy: Case Study in Thailand

Detection of Multipath Propagation Effects in SAR-Tomography with MIMO Modes

GLONASS-based Single-Frequency Static- Precise Point Positioning

Positioning by an Active GPS System: Experimental Investigation of the Attainable Accuracy. Werner LIENHART, Andreas WIESER, Fritz K.

Global Positioning System (GPS) Positioning Errors During Ionospheric Scintillation Event. Keywords: GPS; scintillation; positioning error

A GPS RECEIVER DESIGNED FOR CARRIER-PHASE TIME TRANSFER

GPS ANTENNA WITH METALLIC CONICAL STRUC- TURE FOR ANTI-JAMMING APPLICATIONS

Orion-S GPS Receiver Software Validation

Multipath Error Detection Using Different GPS Receiver s Antenna

AN ALGORITHM FOR NETWORK REAL TIME KINEMATIC PROCESSING

Performances of Modernized GPS and Galileo in Relative Positioning with weighted ionosphere Delays

New Systems, New Signals Providing BeiDou Integration Technical literature

INTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS FROM GPS JANUARY TO MARCH 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT

SPEEDING UP FILTER CONVERGENCE IN HIGH PRECISION, VERY LARGE AREA KINEMATIC NAVIGATION

Towards a EUREF Service Providing Real-time GNSS Clock and Orbit Corrections

Modelling GPS Observables for Time Transfer

Leica GRX1200 Series High Performance GNSS Reference Receivers

Effects of magnetic storms on GPS signals

Assessment of GNSS Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC Monitoring Using the Multi-constellation GPStation-6 Receiver

Real-Time Multipath Estimation for Dual Frequency GPS Ionospheric Delay Measurements

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 8, August ISSN

Transcription:

Carrier Phase Multipath Corrections Based on GNSS Signal Quality Measurements to Improve CORS Observations Christian Rost and Lambert Wanninger Geodetic Institute Technische Universität Dresden Dresden, Germany christian.rost@tu-dresden.de Abstract Carrier phase multipath caused by reflections in the vicinity of GNSS stations is a major error source of precise differential positioning. Detection and mitigation of carrier phase multipath errors can be based on signal quality measurements, i.e. signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) or carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N), as provided by GNSS receivers. Variations of the signal quality oscillation frequency are caused by changes of the reflected signal s additional path length. Calculating carrier phase multipath corrections from signal quality time series is not simple. Most published algorithms need various interim results, e.g. phase shift or attenuation factors, to calculate the final correction value. Our algorithm, however, directly estimates carrier phase multipath corrections from signal quality measurements. In order to validate the potential of this multipath mitigation method in practice, GPS/GLONASS observation data sets of six continuously operating reference stations (CORS) of the German SAPOS network were corrected. All these stations are equipped with receivers for which the signal quality based multipath mitigation performs similarly well for both frequencies. Thus multipath mitigation may even improve coordinate results based on the ionospherefree linear combination. We present a detailed analysis of the effects of carrier phase multipath corrections on positioning results in this CORS subnetwork. GNSS; carrier phase multipath; signal-to-noise; signal quality; CORS I. INTRODUCTION Ideally, a signal transmitted by a satellite arrives at a receiving antenna on its direct path. However, the direct signal is superimposed by indirect signals, which are either reflected in the receiver antenna surroundings or at the transmitting satellite. This causes the received signal to become a composite signal whose phase is shifted when compared to the direct signal. Assuming a single reflected signal the amplitude A c of the composed signal and the carrier phase error due to multipath interference can be described as indicated in [1] and [2] by A c = A d 1+ 2 cos r + 2, (1) sin = arctan r. (2) 1+ cos r A d denotes the amplitude of the direct signal (as voltage ratio), the ratio of the amplitude of reflected and direct signal ( 1) and r the phase shift with respect to the direct signal. The theoretical maximum carrier phase error occurs for = 1 and r =. This yields maximum phase range error of 4.8 cm and 6.1 cm for Global Positioning System (GPS) L1 and L2, respectively. In addition to carrier phase and code observables Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers record information concerning the signal quality. Signal quality is a generic term which describes the ratio of signal power to noise power. Signal-to-noise ratio can usually be found in the context of signals as baseband using the power of the modulated signal at correlator output [3]. As shown in [3] and [4] the quality of a received GNSS signal is commonly described by its carrier-tonoise ratio using the power of the unmodulated carrier at the receiving antenna. Nevertheless, signal quality is given either as signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) or as carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N). In order to ensure comparability among various GNSS receivers, signal quality is often normalized to a specific loop bandwidth, e.g. 1 Hz. This yields to signal-to-noise power density ratio (S/N ) and carrier-to-noise power density ratio (C/N ) [5]. The link between oscillations in the recorded signal quality and carrier phase multipath is described in detail in e.g. [6], [7] and [8]. This paper describes the effect of carrier phase multipath corrections based on signal quality measurement on GPS/GLONASS observation data sets of six continuously operating reference stations (CORS) of the German SAPOS network. The following section outlines the model for estimating carrier phase error due to multipath. The third section will give a short overview of the network stations used for analysis. Results of the data analysis are described in section four. Funding for this research was provided by ESF and the State Saxony. 978-1-4244-537-4/1/$26. 21 IEEE 1162

II. CARRIER PHASE MULTIPATH ESTIMATION BASED ON MEASURED SIGNAL QUALITY The algorithm used in this paper to improve CORS of the German SAPOS network is described in [9]. At first, the ratio Q A of the amplitude of the composite signal A c and the amplitude of the direct signal A d is obtained from (2) 53 11 Lower Saxony 12 13 Mecklenburg Western Pomerania 53 72 Q A = A c A d = 1+ 2 cos r + 2. (3) Saxony Anhalt 67 The direct signal amplitudes A d were determined by polynomial fits to the raw signal quality measurements. Afterwards the carrier phase multipath error is obtained by differentiating Q A with respect to r 52 83 78 97 52 sq = arcsin dq A. (4) d r A simple geometric situation of one almost horizontal reflector below the antenna horizon is assumed. Then changes of r over time can be estimated by d r dt = 2 2hcos el del dt. (5) Changes of the satellite s elevation angle over time (del/dt) can easily be computed from broadcast ephemeris. The vertical distance h between antenna and horizontal reflector must be known. denotes the GNSS wavelength. The algorithm was tested using data sets of two Leica GRX12GG Pro receivers. In contrast to older Leica receivers tested in [7], with GRX12 receivers, L2 carrier phase multipath corrections from signal quality observations perform as well as L1 corrections. Earlier tests showed that a large amount of the carrier phase multipath effect can be removed and thus, carrier phase multipath corrections could improve positioning results [9]. A successful multipath mitigation using the aforementioned technique is restricted to certain applications and multipath environments. These restrictions include: observations collected in static mode, multipath caused by geometrically welldefined reflectors. Furthermore, if there is more than one welldefined reflector, estimating the carrier phase multipath corrections as shown above is expected to fail. III. CORS NETWORK SAXONY-ANHALT In order to further validate the potential of this multipath mitigation method in practice, GPS/GLONASS observation data sets of six CORS of the federal state of Saxony-Anhalt, a subnetwork of the German SAPOS network, were used. Fig. 1 gives an overview of the CORS location within the subnetwork of Saxony-Anhalt. Horizontal reflectors dominate the station 51 Thuringia Saxony Leica AR25/GRX12+GNSS Leica AT54 (GG)/GRX12GG PRO other stations 5 km 11 11 Figure 1. CORS of the SAPOS subnetwork of Saxony-Anhalt used for the data analysis. surroundings of these six CORS. All CORS are equipped with Leica receivers and choke ring antennas (see Fig. 1 for details). The antennas are mounted on the roof of the buildings with a vertical distance antenna reflector between.7 m and 4.2 m (see Fig. 2). The network baselines vary between 36.2 km and 139.9 km. Seven days (2 8 October 29) of GPS/GLONASS data collected at 15 s sample intervals were used for the analysis. This set of data was recorded especially with signal quality resolution of.25 db-hz and.5 db-hz respectively. Usually the resolution of SAPOS signal quality values is 1 db-hz only. The data were collected with a or 5 elevation mask. IV. PHASE MULTIPATH ESTIMATION AND DATA ANALYSIS GPS and GLONASS carrier phase multipath corrections were estimated for the six CORS from signal quality using the algorithm presented in section two. The phase corrections were applied to the raw phase observations stored in RINEX format (RINEX Receiver Independent Exchange Format). In a second step, the original and the corrected data were analysed in a baseline mode with the baseline processor Wa1. Precise GPS/GLONASS orbits from ESOC (European Space Operation Centre) and antenna phase centre corrections were taken into account. 12 13 51 1163

67 72 78 83 97 11 Figure 2. Aerial photos of the station surroundings of the CORS used in this study (source: Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy). Single epoch baseline coordinate solutions were computed for the ionosphere-free linear combination. Because of the length of the baselines, tropospheric zenith delays had to be estimated. To ensure the comparability of the results, all baselines were computed with a 5 elevation cut-off. Tab. I summarises the change of the standard deviation from ionosphere-free single epoch coordinate residuals (separately for the horizontal components and height) in per cent. The lower triangular matrix shows the change for the GPS/GLONASS solution, whereas the upper triangular matrix shows the change for the GPS solution. Implementing GPS and GLONASS L1 and L2 carrier phase multipath corrections for phase data leads to improvement of the positioning results, especially for the height component it can be up to 13%. This is remarkable, because all stations are equipped with a conventional choke ring antenna or a conical choke ring antenna (see Fig. 3 and Fig. for details). Nonetheless, deterioration especially in the horizontal components up to 6.5% can also be seen. The differences of the standard deviations from original and corrected positioning residuals are in the same order for the following days. Due to an inhomogeneous tropospheric influence the percentage improvement on several days is smaller than shown in Tab. I. The baselines including station 67 show the largest improvements for the combined GPS/GLONASS solution as well as for the GPS solution. The comparison of original with corrected single epoch coordinate residuals reveals that the effect of carrier phase multipath on the positioning results can be reduced (see sample in Fig. 4). Fig 4 compares three hours of single epoch coordinate residuals of original and corrected data for the ionosphere-free linear combination from baseline 67 83. Particularly peaks in the single epoch coordinates height component (bottom row) can be attenuated. In general, the phase multipath corrections decrease, but not completely remove systematic errors in the positioning residuals. TABLE I. CHANGE OF POSITIONING RESULTS FOR IONOSPHERE-FREE SINGLE EPOCH COORDINATE RESIDUALS (NORTH/EAST/UP) AS OF 2 OCTOBER 29 FROM STANDARD DEVIATIONS FROM ORIGINAL AND CORRECTED DATA. THE UPPER TRIANGULAR MATRIX SHOW THE IMPROVEMENT IN PER CENT FOR GPS SOLUTION AND THE LOWER TRIANGULAR MATRIX FOR GPS/GLONASS SOLUTION. CORS 67 72 78 83 97 11 GPS solution 67 north/east/up 8.5/ 9.7/ 8.6 4.7/ 7.4/ 7.4 11.9/ 8.9/12.9 8./ 9.2/13.1 11.1/1.7/ 9.8 72 9. 7/ 9.3/ 7.2 2.3/ 2.8/.6 6.8/ 1.3/ 3. 8 2.3/ 2.3/.3.1/ 4.1/.5 78 6.7/ 6.6/ 8.7 2.3/ 3.6/.1 3.1/.5/ 2.7./ 1,8/.6 2.2/ 5.8/.6 83 11./ 6.6/12.3 6.8/ 2.5/ 3..1/ 1.2/ 5.1 9.2/ 1.3/ 4.7 4.6/ 3.4/ 5.6 97 9.4/ 8.6/13.7.4/ 1./ 1.1 4.1/ 3.1/ 4.6 5.7/.7/ 4.8.9/ 6.6/ 1.3 11 11.9/ 9.7/1.7.3/ 4.6/.5 6.5/ 5.1/ 3.7 5./ 1.3/ 5.6.8/ 8.3/ 1.6 GPS/GLONASS solution 1164

computed with WaSoft/Multipath [1]. In contrast to the algorithm presented in section one WaSoft/Multipath uses carrier phase observations to detect and to locate carrier phase multipath errors for the ionosphere-free linear combination [1]. The data basis comprises seven days of phase observations of the six CORS. Leica AT54 (GG) Leica AR25 Figure 3. Different Leica choke ring antenna models used in this study, the conventional choke ring antenna AT54 (GG) and the conical choke ring antenna AR25 (source: Leica Geosystems). Tab. I reveals that the positioning change in other CORS combinations is negligible or negative in some cases. A thorough analysis of the data has shown that the station surroundings from CORS 72, 78, 97 and 11 do not conform to the model-based assumption of one well-defined reflector. As has shown in Fig. 2 these stations have more than one horizontal reflector below the antenna horizon. Only the CORS 67 and 83 will the model-based assumption of one well-defined horizontal reflector. The various reflectors of the other CORS cause false carrier phase multipath corrections. To assess the impact of several horizontal reflectors on the carrier phase multipath corrections estimated from signal quality, the original as well as the corrected RINEX files were A comparison of original with corrected carrier phase multipath maps for the different CORS used in this study is given in Fig. 5. It reveals that a large portion of the carrier phase multipath effects can be removed, especially for the stations 67 and 83. Both CORS match the model-based assumption of one well-defined reflector. For station 78 phase multipath effects in the north east direction could be removed. Phase multipath in the south west direction, however, was increased. The false corrections are the result from a second horizontal reflector in the south west direction near the antenna phase centre (see Fig. 6). The multipath maps, especially for stations 67 and 78 indicate that the conical choke ring antennas do not guarantee multipath free observation data from satellites with lower elevation. V. CONCLUSIONS Carrier phase multipath corrections for GPS and GLONASS were estimated using signal quality measurements. The carrier phase multipath corrections were applied to observation data from six continuously operating reference stations (CORS) of the SAPOS subnetwork Saxony-Anhalt. Comparing baseline solutions for the ionosphere-free linear combination north, in cm 4 2 2 4.94 cm/.8 cm east, in cm 4 2 2 4.76 cm/.66 cm up, in cm 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 2.37 cm/1.82 cm original corrected 1 3 4 5 6 time, in hour Figure 4. GPS single epoch residuals from original (grey) and corrected (black) data for baseline 67 83. Top row show residuals for north, middle row for east and bottom row for height component with standard deviations (original/corrected) for the given time range. 1165

67 original data corrected data 4 2 72 4 2 78 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 83 97 11 9 18 27 36 9 18 27 36 azimuth, in azimuth, in standard deviation L no data available < 5 mm 5 15 mm > 15 mm Figure 5. Carrier phase multipath maps estimated with WaSoft/Multipath from original (left) and corrected (right) phase data (data from 2 8 October 29) for the CORS used in this study. before and after applying phase multipath corrections shows an improvement in the single epoch coordinate standard deviation up to 13%. Figure 6. Detail picture of the station surrounding of CORS 78 (facing west) before the change to a choke ring antenna. The balustrade on the left causes false carrier phase multipath estimation. Our experience in applying the described technique of computing phase multipath corrections to CORS observation data indicates that extracting corrections requires a careful station selection. Due to several restrictions, the described method cannot be used for multipath mitigation in general. Nevertheless, the results presented in this paper suggest that if signal quality measurements are available for GNSS stations on both frequencies with an appropriate resolution, this technique could be useful to remove carrier phase multipath errors for GNSS sites with a simple well-defined multipath environment. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to thank the Landesamt für Vermessung und Geoinformation (LVermGeo) of Saxony-Anhalt for deployment the CORS observation data and additional material. REFERENCES [1] G. J. Bishop, J. A. Klobuchar and P. H. Doherty, Multipath effects on the determination of absolute ionospheric time delay from GPS signals, Radio Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 388 396, 1985. [2] Y. Georgiadou and A. Kleusberg, On Carrier Phase Multipath Effects in Relative GPS Positioning, Manuscripta Geodaetica, vol. 13, pp. 172 179, 1988. [3] R. B. Langley, GPS receiver system noise, GPS World, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 4 45, 1997. [4] P. W. Ward, J. W. Betz and C. J. Hegarty, Interference, multipath and scintillation, ARTECH HOUSE, Norwood, chapter 6, 26. [5] F. Butsch, A Growing Concern: Radiofrequency Interference and GPS, GPS World, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 4 46, 22. [6] C. J. Comp and P. Axelrad, Adaptive SNR-based carrier phase multipath mitigation technique, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 34 no. 1, pp. 264 276, 1998. [7] A. L. Bilich, P. Axelrad and K. M. Larson, Scientific Utility of the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) Reported by Geodetic GPS Receivers, in Proceedings of the 2th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation ION GNSS 27, Fort Worth, Texas, pp. 1999 21, 27. 1166

[8] A. L. Bilich, K. M. Larson and P. Axelrad, Modeling GPS phase multipath with SNR: Case study from the Salar de Uyuni, Boliva, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 113, B441, 28. [9] C. Rost and L. Wanninger, Carrier phase multipath mitigation based on GNSS signal quality measurements, Journal of Applied Geodesy, vol. 3, no. 2, 81 87, 29. [1] L. Wanninger and M. May, Carrier Phase Multipath Calibration of GPS Reference Stations, in Proceedings of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation : ION GPS 2, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 132 144, 2. 1167