Technical Considerations: Nuts and Bolts Project Planning and Technical Justification

Similar documents
Introduction to Radio Interferometry Anand Crossley Alison Peck, Jim Braatz, Ashley Bemis (NRAO)

Introduction to Radio Interferometry Sabrina Stierwalt Alison Peck, Jim Braatz, Ashley Bemis

Planning ALMA Observations

REDUCTION OF ALMA DATA USING CASA SOFTWARE

Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

Atacama Large Millimeter Array Project Status. M. Tarenghi ALMA Director

ALMA. ALMA Construction Status. Mark McKinnon. ALMA-NA Project Director/Manager September 28, 2011

What is CASA? Rachel Friesen. North American ALMA Science Center. Victoria BC, January 18, 2011 ALMA Software Tutorial 1

Sideband Smear: Sideband Separation with the ALMA 2SB and DSB Total Power Receivers

ASTRO 6525 Lecture #18:! (Sub-)Millimeter Interferometry I!! October 27, 2015!

Planning (VLA) observations

Guide to observation planning with GREAT

Observing Modes and Real Time Processing

ACA; Atacama Compact Array

More Radio Astronomy

ALMA Memo #289 Atmospheric Noise in Single Dish Observations Melvyn Wright Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley 29 February

Radio Interferometers Around the World. Amy J. Mioduszewski (NRAO)

Advanced Calibration Topics - II

The ALMA Front End. Hans Rudolf

Evolution of the Capabilities of the ALMA Array

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

Comparing MMA and VLA Capabilities in the GHz Band. Socorro, NM Abstract

Submillimeter (continued)

Radio Interferometry. Xuening Bai. AST 542 Observational Seminar May 4, 2011

Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

ALMA water vapour radiometer project

ALMA Phase Calibration, Phase Correction and the Water Vapour Radiometers

INTERFEROMETRY: II Nissim Kanekar (NCRA TIFR)

Receiver Performance and Comparison of Incoherent (bolometer) and Coherent (receiver) detection

A model for the SKA. Melvyn Wright. Radio Astronomy laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, ABSTRACT

Imaging Simulations with CARMA-23

EVLA Scientific Commissioning and Antenna Performance Test Check List

EVLA System Commissioning Results

Wide-Band Imaging. Outline : CASS Radio Astronomy School Sept 2012 Narrabri, NSW, Australia. - What is wideband imaging?

Introduction to Imaging in CASA

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 1. Basic Radio/mm Astronomy

Very Long Baseline Interferometry. Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

Calibration Issues for the MMA

Time and Frequency Distribution Overview and Issues Rob Selina

Phase and Amplitude Calibration in CASA for ALMA data

ESO/ALBiUS activities in ALMA imaging with CASA

Large-field imaging. Frédéric Gueth, IRAM Grenoble. 7th IRAM Millimeter Interferometry School 4 8 October 2010

The Basics of Radio Interferometry. Frédéric Boone LERMA, Observatoire de Paris

LOFAR: Special Issues

When, why and how to self-cal Nathan Brunetti, Crystal Brogan, Amanda Kepley

The 4mm (68-92 GHz) Receiver

Introduction to Interferometry. Michelson Interferometer. Fourier Transforms. Optics: holes in a mask. Two ways of understanding interferometry

JCMT HETERODYNE DR FROM DATA TO SCIENCE

Why Single Dish? Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson

Pointing Calibration Steps

EVLA Antenna and Array Performance. Rick Perley

VLBI Post-Correlation Analysis and Fringe-Fitting

EVLA Memo #166 Comparison of the Performance of the 3-bit and 8-bit Samplers at C (4 8 GHz), X (8 12 GHz) and Ku (12 18 GHz) Bands

Heterogeneous Array Imaging with the CARMA Telescope

Observing Techniques and Calibration. David Frayer (Green Bank Observatory)

Propagation effects (tropospheric and ionospheric phase calibration)

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

Wide Bandwidth Imaging

MMA Memo 143: Report of the Receiver Committee for the MMA

ALMA Technology and. N.D. Whyborn ALMA AIV Lead Engineer

Principles of Radio Interferometry. Ast735: Submillimeter Astronomy IfA, University of Hawaii

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

ngvla Technical Overview

Volume 82 VERY LONG BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY AND THE VLBA. J. A. Zensus, P. J. Diamond, and P. J. Napier

To print higher-resolution math symbols, click the Hi-Res Fonts for Printing button on the jsmath control panel.

Introduction to interferometry with bolometers: Bob Watson and Lucio Piccirillo

The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array: Current Status. Alison Peck Deputy Project Scientist Joint ALMA Office

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

Recent imaging results with wide-band EVLA data, and lessons learnt so far

Symmetry in the Ka-band Correlation Receiver s Input Circuit and Spectral Baseline Structure NRAO GBT Memo 248 June 7, 2007

SMA Technical Memo #165? (draft)

mm/sub-mm interferometry Vincent Pietu IRAM Material from Melanie Krips, Michael Bremer, Frederic Gueth

Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry. Robert Laing (ESO)

How small can you get? reducing data volume, retaining good imaging

The WVR at Effelsberg. Thomas Krichbaum

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jun 2006

High Fidelity Imaging of Extended Sources. Rick Perley NRAO Socorro, NM

The Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared (HIFI) and its data

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.733-1* (Question ITU-R 42/4 (1990))**

Practicalities of Radio Interferometry

DECEMBER 1964 NUMBER OF COPIES: 75

Practicalities of Radio Interferometry

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

VLBI2010: In search of Sub-mm Accuracy

CARMA Memorandum Series #14 1

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Green Bank, West Virginia Electronics Division Internal Report No 76

Submillimeter Array Technical Memorandum

IF/LO Systems for Single Dish Radio Astronomy Centimeter Wave Receivers

Fundamentals of Interferometry

Fundamentals of the GBT and Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena

ARRAY CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL POWER CALIBRATION FOR LEDA

ALMA Sensitivity Metric for Science Sustainability Projects

EVLA Memo 105. Phase coherence of the EVLA radio telescope

Developments in Expanding the Event Horizon Telescope: Phased ALMA and South Pole Telescope

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Apr 1999

Recent progress and future development of Nobeyama 45-m Telescope

Pulsar Timing Array Requirements for the ngvla Next Generation VLA Memo 42

Phased Array Feeds for the SKA. WP2.2.3 PAFSKA Consortium CSIRO ASTRON DRAO NRAO BYU OdP Nancay Cornell U Manchester

Transcription:

Technical Considerations: Nuts and Bolts Project Planning and Technical Justification Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

Overview of Talk Perspective: Getting time on will be competitive! The math: only ~600 hours for ES cycle 0 at ~6 hours per project! ~100 projects split over the world Motivation: While is for everyone, a technical justification is required for each proposal, so you need to know some of the details of how the instrument works Goal: Do the best job you can to match your science to s capabilities 2

Sky coverage available is at a latitude of -23 degrees! Southern sky! Antenna elevation limit is technically 3 degrees But in practice, atmospheric opacity will cause significant degradation with lower elevation! most severe at higher frequencies Maximum length of observation for Northern sources (hrs)!"#$ %&"'$($)*+$ %&"'$($,-+$ %&"'$($.-+$!"#$ %&"$ '$ '$ /0-$ "&($ 01.$ '$!)#$ *&)$ +&)$ )&,$!%#$ (&-$ *&"$ "&*$ Note: This table does not account for shadowing, which further impedes low elevation observations in compact configurations. 3

Receiver Bands Available 3 mm 1.3 mm 0.87 mm 0.45 mm Only 4 of 8 bands are available for Early Science, all with dual linear polarization feeds Only 3 receiver bands can be ready at one time (i.e. amplifiers powered on and stable temperature achieved). Required lead time to stabilize a new band is about 20 minutes. With configurations of ~125m and ~400m, approximately matched resolution is possible between Bands 3 and 7, or between Bands 6 and 9 Matched resolution can be critical, for example to measure the SEDs of resolved sources. 4

Atmospheric Opacity (PWV = Precipitable Water Vapor) 5

Sensitivity calculator http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/alma/observing/tools/etc n p = # polarizations N = # antennas Δν= channel width Δt = total time 6

Choosing your bands I (constructed from sensitivity calculator) NOTE: For 8 GHz continuum bandwidth divide by!2 7

Choosing your bands - II 8

Correlator Modes, Spectral Resolution, Spectral Coverage - I Receivers are sensitive to two separate ranges of sky frequency: sidebands Each antenna has 4 digitizers which can each sample 2 GHz of bandwidth These 2 GHz chunks are termed basebands, and can be distributed among the sidebands (in ES: either all four in one, or two in both as shown below) For Bands 3 & 7 Local Oscillator Frequency (NOTE: In Band 9, you can also have 1 or 3 basebands in a sideband.) 9

Correlator Modes, Spectral Resolution, Spectral Coverage - II **For Bands 3 & 7 Spectral windows In order to collect data, you need to set up a spectral window within one (or more) basebands. In Early Science, only 4 spectral windows are available, i.e. one per baseband, and all must have the same resolution and bandwidth **Note: exact spacing between sidebands and sideband widths vary from band to band OT will show correct one for each band 10

Correlator Modes and Spectral Resolution 234"$ 53&6789 :6;3<$ =6<4>84?@$ A"7$ B6C"B6<4$ D2E:F$ GHIB"7$3J$ #@6<<"&C$ A"7$ B6C"B6<4$ K@6<<"&$ LA6#8<M$ D2E:F$ N"&3#8?O$ >84?@$6?$.--$PE:$ DQIRCF$ *$./01$ 2(*"$ )(-#$ #&-(($ #&-($ ($./01$,)($ )(-#$ #&%--$ #&%-$,$./01$ -+,$ )(-#$ #&2%%$ #&2%$ 2#$./01$ %)-$ )(-#$ #&#+2$ #&#+$ 22$./01$ 22*$ )(-#$ #&#)#"$ #&#)$ 2%$./01$ "(&+$ )(-#$ #&#2")$ #&#2"$ +$ 345617$ "(&+$ *+(#$ #&##*+)$ #&##($ +,$./01$ %###$ 2%($ 2"&+%"$ 2"&+$ *2$ 345617$ %###$ %"+$ *&(2%"$ *&($ These numbers are per baseband (you can use up to 4 basebands) Usually want to have several channels across narrowest line Note that the resolution is ~ 2*channel width (Hanning) The required spectral resolution typically needs to be justified 11 as does the number of desired spectral windows

Spectral lines in the bands SMA spectrum of Arp 220 (Band 6) (Martin et al. 2011) 12

Spectral Lines in the bands http://www.splatalogue.net (large subset also available in OT) 13

Image Quality Sensitivity is not enough! Image quality also depends on UV coverage and density of UV samples Image fidelity is improved when high density regions of UV coverage are well matched to source brightness distribution! The required DYNAMIC RANGE can be more important than sensitivity! OT currently has no way to specify required image quality, but you can request more time in the Technical Justification

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas (Image sequence taken from Summer School lecture by D. Wilner) 2 Antennas 15

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 3 Antennas 16

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 4 Antennas 17

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 5 Antennas 18

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 6 Antennas 19

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 7 Antennas 20

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas 21

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas x 6 Samples 22

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas x 30 Samples 23

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas x 60 Samples 24

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas x 120 Samples 25

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas x 240 Samples 26

Dirty Beam Shape and N Antennas 8 Antennas x 480 Samples 27

Effects of UV Coverage 5σ 5σ 10σ 15σ 20σ Note improved uv-coverage with time for same config. 28

Spatial Filters for Cycle 0 Cycle 0 Shortest baselines Compact Array provide better imaging of extended sources (although all arrays are blind to sources larger than some size) Cycle 0 Extended Array Maximum baselines provide finest resolution Community Day, STScI, Baltimore MD April 18, 2011 From Technical Handbook 29

Maximum Angular Scale =6<4$ S7"TH"<#O$ DPE:F$ 578I67O$ B"6I$D!F$ 26U8IHI$V<MH&67$L#6&"$D!F$$$ K3IA6#?$$$$$$$$%U?"<4"4$ )$ (-'22+$ *%$'$"%$ %#$ 2#$ +$ %22'%*"$ %,$'$%%$,$ -&"$ *$ %*"')*)$ %%$'$2+$ +$ )$,$ +#%'*%#$ 2#$8$(&"$ )$ 2&"$ Smooth structures larger than MAS are completely resolved out Begin to lose total recovered flux for objects on the order of half MAS 30

Sensitivity and Brightness Temperature There will be a factor of 10 difference in brightness temperature sensitivity between the 2 configurations offered in Early Science. Very important to take into account for resolved sources. Example: 1 minute integration at 230 GHz with 1 km/sec channels: K3<WMH76;3<$ ="6IC8:"$ S&HU$$4"<C8?O$ L"<C8;'8?O$$ =78M@?<"CC$ C"<C8;'8?O$ 2%"$9$ )"$ )%$9:;<=709$ #&#,$>$ -##$9$ 2"$ #&(%$>$ 31

Choose Single Field or Mosaic Example: SMA 1.3 mm observations: 5 pointings Primary beam ~1# Resolution ~3" 3.0 # 1.3mm PB CFHT Petitpas et al. 1.5 # 0.85mm PB In ES, the number of pointings will <= 50.

Observatory Default Calibration Need to measure and remove the (time-dependent and frequency-dependent) atmospheric and instrumental variations. Set calibration to system-defined calibration unless you have very specific requirements for calibration (which then must be explained in the Technical Justification). Defaults include (suitable calibrators are chosen at observation time): 1. Pointing, focus, and delay calibration 2. Phase and amplitude gain calibration 3. Absolute flux calibration 4. Bandpass calibration 5. System Temperature calibration 6. Water-vapor radiometry correction 33

Atmospheric phase fluctuations Variations in the amount of precipitable water vapor (PWV) cause phase fluctuations, which are worse at shorter wavelengths (higher frequencies), and result in: Low coherence (loss of sensitivity) Radio!seeing", typically 0.1-1! at 1 mm Anomalous pointing offsets Anomalous delay offsets You can observe in apparently excellent submm weather (in terms of transparency) and still have terrible seeing i.e. phase stability. Patches of air with different water vapor content (and hence index of refraction) affect the incoming wave front differently. 34

Future Capabilities Better sensitivity and image fidelity: Imaging fidelity ~10x better, Sensitivity > 3x better Fantastic snapshot uv-coverage (50 x 12m antennas = 1225 baselines) Higher angular resolution: baselines ~15km, matched beams possible in all bands Better imaging of resolved objects and mosaics TPA: four additional 12m antennas with subreflector nutators ACA: Atacama Compact configuration 12 x 7m antennas On-the-Fly mosaics: quickly cover larger areas of sky More receiver bands: 4, 8, 10 (2mm, 0.7mm, 0.35mm) Polarization: magnetic fields and very high dynamic range imaging Mixed correlator modes (simultaneous wide & narrow, see A&A 462, 801) development program! studies just beginning mm VLBI, more receiver bands Higher data rates 35

www.almaobservatory.org The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (), an international astronomy facility, is a partnership among Europe, Japan and North America, in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. is funded in Europe by the European Organization for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, in Japan by the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS) in cooperation with the Academia Sinica in Taiwan and in North America by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) in cooperation with the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). construction and operations are led on behalf of Europe by ESO, on behalf of Japan by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ) and on behalf of North America by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO), which is managed by Associated Universities, Inc. (AUI). AAS217: Special Session