Proceedings of the 10 th Annual Nutrient Management Conference. Do not reproduce or redistribute without the written consent of author(s)

Similar documents
Evaluation of winter wheat cultivar performance under continuous crop, crop-crop-fallow and crop-fallow systems in central Montana

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program Project Report Reducing Phosphorus and Nitrogen Loss with Aerway Incorporation of Manure

NNY Agricultural Development Program Project Report

GreenSeeker Handheld Crop Sensor Features

Shape File Attribute Grain Harvest

MONITORING CROP GROWTH STATUS BASED ON OPTICAL SENSOR

George Vellidis Crop & Soil Sciences Department University of Georgia

2015 High Tunnel Bell Pepper Variety Trials

Combine Calibration : S Series Harvest Monitor. Accessing User Calibrations. Temperature Calibration

Precision Ag: Profitability and Use. Ken O Brien 17 April 2008

An NDVI image provides critical crop information that is not visible in an RGB or NIR image of the same scene. For example, plants may appear green

2007 MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

Crop and Irrigation Water Management Using High-resolution Airborne Remote Sensing

The Radiation Balance

Yield Monitoring Systems: Understanding how we Estimate Yield

Yield Calibration Procedure S-Series Combines

SMART Irrigation Controllers. Utilizing Weather based irrigation controllers to conserve water

Wireless sensor systems for irrigation management in container grown crops

TIS-PRO BIDDING SPECIFICATIONS

S600/2630 Display Combine Yield Calibration Procedure

CORN YIELD TRIAL CENTRAL LAKES AG CENTER. Central Lakes College 1830 Airport Rd. Staples MN

Use of Knowledge Modeling to Characterize the NOAA Observing System Architecture

Valuable New Information for Precision Agriculture. Mike Ritter Founder & CEO - SLANTRANGE, Inc.

Why TheProfiler? Save 9me, money, and water by knowing exactly how much moisture your crops need during the growing season.

Example of Analysis of Yield or Landsat Data Based on Assessing the Consistently Lowest 20 Percent by Using

CHAPTER 11. Balanced Three-Phase Circuits

Using Multi-spectral Imagery in MapInfo Pro Advanced

W80947VT2RIB 94 Day RM

Extra Practice 1. Name Date. Lesson 8.1: Parallel Lines. 1. Which line segments are parallel? How do you know? a) b) c) d)

HarvestLab & John Deere Constituent Sensing Training

orn Hybrid Maturity Rating f t :, '' for Alabama

Pennsylvania: A Climate Refuge?

Bringing Hyperspectral Imaging Into the Mainstream

Setup Guide. support.spruceirrigation.com.

Illinois Learning Standards For Science

Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Oklahoma State University

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CHAPTER 22. Matching Remote Sensing to Problems

New Online/Web-based Services

Reflection and Absorption of Light

How is GPS Used in Farming? Equipment Guidance Systems

Cut Crop Edge Detection Using a Laser Sensor

Climate Change Observations Using Ground Based Optical Remote Sensing Instruments vs. Cameras

ēko Pro Series System

UNDERSTAND SIMILARITY IN TERMS OF SIMILARITY TRANSFORMATIONS

Real Time Kinematic VALUE GUIDE (US, Canada, Australia & New Zealand) CLICK THE ARROW TO GET STARTED

Sludge dewatering. Wolfgang Stump Öko-control GmbH; Burgwall 13a; D Schönebeck

Case IH Series

Central Platte Natural Resources District-Remote Sensing/Satellite Evapotranspiration Project. Progress Report September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bradley A. King Associate Professor Aberdeen R&E Station University of Idaho Aberdeen, ID Introduction:

European Thick Mud. How to use Weathering Effects

Design and Implementation of a Wireless Sensor Network on Precision Agriculture

Unit 3 Phenology LESSON OUTLINE: OUTCOMES: GRADUATION STANDARDS: KEY CONCEPTS: and abiotic factors can change over time.

Hyperspectral Imagery for Various Crop Growth Information Extraction

SWAT LAI calibration with local LAI measurements

AUTOMATION OF MICRO-MET SYSTEMS TO EVALUATE CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION

Developed by the Maryland Council on Economic Education through partnership and funding from Consumer Credit Counseling Service of MD & DE

Yara Water Solution. Installation Guide. Product summary: - Included components - Tools for setup - Installation overview

Cattle and Beef Markets: Short and Long Run Challenges and Opportunities

Image transformations

Lesson 4: General Pyramids and Cones and Their Cross-Sections

Drip In Classic Turbulent Flow Dripline

Satellite Remote Sensing: Earth System Observations

Evaluation of Effectiveness and Cost-Benefits of Woolen Roadside Reclamation Products

Getting Started with Drones in Agriculture

Nadir and Oblique Canopy Reflectance Sensing for N Application in Corn

The techniques with ERDAS IMAGINE include:

Past, Present and Future U.S. Lamb Market, 2013

PRECISE MEASUREMENTS OF SOLAR BEAM IRRADIANCE THROUGH IMPROVED SENSOR CALIBRATION

Acecap/Medicap Application Guide:

1211C Series Bi-color Type (1.6 X 1.5 mm)

Operating Temperature : -40 ~85 Lead free soldering compatible RoHS compliant. :θx = 150 deg., θy =140 deg. :θx = 148 deg., θy =140 deg.

( ) 7

GeoPoll Technical Report: Farm Radio International Ghana Rice production in Volta & Maize production in Brong Ahafo regions of Ghana

EFFECT OF A MICROBIAL INOCULANT ON GROWTH AND CHLOROPHYLL LEVEL OF LETTUCE AND RADISH SEEDLINGS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY INTRODUCTION

ECE 334: Electronic Circuits Lecture 2: BJT Large Signal Model

Effect of moisture on fluid and granular P diffusion in different soils. D. Montalvo, F. Degryse, Sola Ajiboye & Mike McLaughlin

Fourth Grade. Course of Study For Science

B IRD CONSERVATION FOREST BIRD SURVEY ENTERS FINAL WINTER V OLUME 11, NUMBER 1 JANUARY Board of. Trustees. Forest bird survey 1

2. Wood grounds, nailers, blocking, miscellaneous framing, sleepers, etc.

IOT-Hardware Open Platform

An Introduction to Remote Sensing & GIS. Introduction

ENGINEERING our EXISTENCE Supported by

MSU COASTAL R&E CENTER, BEAUMONT

Evaluation Report 701

Logo & Campaign Standards

Workshop 1 Measurement techniques and sensors

Summary. Introduction. Remote Sensing Basics. Selecting a Remote Sensing Product

ACOUSTIC NOISE AND VIBRATIONS DUE TO MAGNETIC FORCES IN ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINES

March 1, Courtney Wilton Portland Public Schools 501 North Dixon Portland, OR 97227

Soil Moisture Control Using RF Transreceiver

Improvement of soil ecosystem multifunctionality by dissipating manure-induced

sedak ceramic-ink printing Printing glass of unique dimensions

2017 ASIC NATIONAL CONFERENCE. Motif Hotel Seattle, Washington

Logic Design I (17.341) Fall Lecture Outline

INSTALLATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MINNEAPOLIS, MN

Remote Sensing Phenology. Bradley Reed Principal Scientist USGS National Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science Sioux Falls, SD

NON-PHOTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS: Multispectral Scanners Medium and coarse resolution sensor comparisons: Landsat, SPOT, AVHRR and MODIS

Online Dynamic Assessment of Transmission Ratings for Transmission Constraint Management in Power System and Market Operations

3mm (T1) Package Discrete LED YELLOW/GREEN, Tri-Color Bi-Color

Nu1nber Theory Park Forest Math Team. Meet #1. Self-study Packet. Problem Categories for this Meet:

Transcription:

Proceedings of the 10 th Annual Conference Do not reproduce or redistribute without the written consent of author(s)

Nitrogen BMPs for Corn Fabián G. Fernández Department of Soil, Water, and Climate fabiangf@umn.edu Conference 20 February 2018, Mankato MN

1) In-season nitrogen application. 1) Is split better than single pre-plant? 2) When splitting, how much N would you need at preplant? 3) Can canopy sensors, soil N, and weather info or models help? 4) If splitting, what is the best time to apply the split? 5) Can enhanced efficiency fertilizers help? 2) Fall and spring applications. 1) What are the differences between fall and spring urea? 2) Can we improve nitrogen management by subsurface banding instead of broadcasting and incorporating urea? 3) Are there benefits using a nitrification inhibitor or other N sources?

In-Season Nitrogen Application

Standarized Design 16 Locations/Year Total 49 Climate Measurement s Soil Crop Precipitation Temperature EC mapping (Veris TM ) Soil sampling (3x) Plant N (VT & R6) Canopy reflectance (V9) Solar radiation Soil moisture ( TRT 3+16) Grain yield and moisture Slide from N. Kitchen

Temperature Precipitation Slide from N. Kitchen

49 Research Sites over 8 States Slide from N. Kitchen

300 250 EONR and Yield at EONR (49 PRNT sites) 300 250 EONR (lbs N/Ac) 200 150 100 50 Yield at EONR (Bu/Ac) 200 150 100 50 0 0 At Planting Topdress At Planting Topdress Slide from N. Kitchen

EONR Agronomic Efficiency (46/49 PRNT sites) EONR Agronomic Efficiency (Bu/lb N) 1.5 1.25 1 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 At Planting Topdress Slide from N. Kitchen

Fine-textured soils mean EONR, Yield Pre-plant: 152, 213 Split: 135, 206 At 0.1 N:corn price ratio ($0.35:$3.50) 17 additional lb of N and 7 bu/a greater yield with pre-plant = $18.55/ac ahead of split Conservative since no additional cost of application was assumed

At 0.1 N:corn price ratio ($0.35:$3.50) 40 additional lb of N and 63 bu/a greater yield with split = $206.50/ac ahead of pre-plant Assumes no additional cost of application with split

Slide from N. Kitchen

When to Side-dress Group 2 Group 1 Group 3 alpha=0.1

Corn yield (bu/ac) for Pre- Plant N Applications Group1 (n=3) Linear response Group3 (n=3) Q+P response AA 86AB AA 166A AAI 102A AAI 179A ESN 99A ESN 167A ESN-Urea 2:1 81ABC ESN-Urea 2:1 183A ESN-Urea 1:2 70BC ESN-Urea 1:2 174A Urea 61C Urea 159A Group2 (n=5) linear response Group4 (n=1) no response AA 108C AA 215A AAI 115C AAI 215A ESN 140AB ESN 206A ESN-Urea 2:1 148A ESN-Urea 2:1 209A ESN-Urea 1:2 142A ESN-Urea 1:2 204A Urea 120BC Urea 198A

Fall Vs. Spring Nitrogen Application

2016 2017

2016 2017

2016 2017 2017

Overall Mean (2016-17 Responsive sites only) Crop rotation Time EONR lb N/ac EONR Yield bu/ac CC Fall 240 190 CC Spring 226 207 CSb Fall 179 212 CSb Spring 154 215

Averaged Across Rates, 2016 164 bu/ac Fall 177 bu/ac Spring 13 bu/ac more with Spring

Averaged Across Rates, 2017 151 bu/ac Fall 162 bu/ac Spring 11 bu/ac more with Spring

NH2-CO-NH2 + H2O CO2 + 2 NH3 (Urea)

Time Product Placement SROC SWROC WCROC 2016 CC CSb CC CSb CSb bu/ac Fall AA+Nserve INJ 191ab 229a* 201a 213a* 180a* Urea BI 179bc 211a 106b 135c 164a Urea SSB 176bc 206a 124b 164b 172a Urea+Instinct BI 155c 205a 105b 156bc 181a Urea+Instinct SSB 216a 221a 131b 174b 167a Spring AA INJ 196a 239a* 186a 210a* 198a* Urea BI 213a 224ab 121c 163b 175a Urea SSB 196a 218b 160ab 171b 177a Urea+Instinct BI 207a 225ab 141bc 170b 178a Urea+Instinct SSB 198a 212b 161ab 171b 172a

Time 2017 Source Placement SROC SWROC WCROC NWROC CSb CC CSb CC CC CSb CWh bu ac -1 Fall AA+Nserve INJ 223a* 168a 203a* 195a 157a ESN BI 204b 154a 190ab 194a 139a 164a 144a Urea BI 199b 151a 141d 170bc 86b 168a 134a Urea SSB 194b 155a 185b 182ab 143a - - Urea+Instinct BI 195b 175a 169c 160c 101b 148a 132a Urea+Instinct SSB 202b 176a 177bc 182ab 135a - - Spring AA INJ 227a* 184c 200a* 208a 125a - - ESN BI 226a 214b 198ab 198a 121a 173a 150a Urea BI 221a 195c 163d 166bc 130a 169a 148a Urea SSB 228a 238a 183bc 178b 135a - - Urea+Instinct BI 224a 191c 180c 156c 123a 158a 150a Urea+Instinct SSB 217a 228a 181c 158c 118a - -

Comparison Time Occurrence Urea SSB > Urea BI Fall 6/22 (mean across w & w/o inhibitor) Spring 4/22 Instinct > No Instinct Fall 2/22 (mean across BI & SSB) Spring 1/22; 1/22* ESN > Urea BI Fall 3/7 Spring 3/7 ESN > AA Fall 0/3 Spring 1/3 AA > Urea BI Fall 7/10 (mean across w & w/o inhibitor) Spring 4/10 AA > Urea SSB Fall 2/10 (mean across w & w/o inhibitor) Spring 2/10; 2/10* *Reverse response. All other comparisons were non significant

Questions Fabián Fernández fabiangf@umn.edu THANK YOU