diagnostic examination

Similar documents
TOPICS: CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of Patient Age & Size and for Different CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions

HISTORY. CT Physics with an Emphasis on Application in Thoracic and Cardiac Imaging SUNDAY. Shawn D. Teague, MD

Pitfalls and Remedies of MDCT Scanners as Quantitative Instruments

Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality and Dose Issues in MSCT. Scanner parameters affecting IQ and Dose

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3 ACR CT Accreditation. Multi-Slice CT Artifacts and Quality Control. What are the rules or recommendations for CT QC?

Automated dose control in multi-slice CT. Nicholas Keat Formerly ImPACT, St George's Hospital, London

Research Support. Dual-Source CT: What is it and How Do I Test it? Cynthia H. McCollough, Ph.D.

Breast Tomosynthesis. Bob Liu, Ph.D. Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital And Harvard Medical School

Detector technology in simultaneous spectral imaging

Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents

Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding

12/21/2016. Siemens Medical Systems Research Agreement Philips Healthcare Research Agreement AAN and ASN Committees

Translating Protocols Between Scanner Manufacturer and Model

STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS

Wide beam CT dosimetry. Elly Castellano

Nuclear Associates

Computed Tomography. The Fundamentals of... THE FUNDAMENTALS OF... Jason H. Launders, MSc. Current Technology

QC by the MPE in Belgium

Features and Weaknesses of Phantoms for CR/DR System Testing

CT Basics: Data Acquisition Module 3

Clinical Experience Using the Open Bore Multislice CT System Supria (16 slice CT) MEDIX VOL. 61 P.8 P.11

CT Basics: Image Quality Module 6

QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner

Electronic Noise in CT Detectors: Impact on Image Noise and Artifacts

Authors: Cabral, Ricardo 1 ; Carvoeiras, Pedro 2 ; Fatana, João 2, ; Alves, Rita 1. 1 Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte - Hospital de Santa Maria; 2

Tomophan TSP004 Manual

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY 1

Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants (O-MAR)

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp

Overview of Safety Code 35

COCIR SELF-REGULATORY INITIATIVE FOR MEDICAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MEASUREMENT OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION

1. Patient size AEC. Large Patient High ma. Small Patient Low ma

Practical Aspects of Medical Physics Surveys of Mammography Equipment and Facilities

TISSUE EQUIVALENT PHANTOMS FOR EVALUATING IN-PLANE TUBE CURRENT MODULATED CT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY

Ludlum Medical Physics

160-slice CT SCANNER / New Standard for the Future

Diffraction-enhanced X-ray Imaging (DEXI) Medical Solutions. More information using less radiation

2012 :15th SESSION of ESMP

X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY

Radionuclide Imaging MII Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)

Mammography: Physics of Imaging

Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Redefining Ergonomics

Wide-Detector CT for TAVR Planning:

FOREWORD. Acknowledgements

Clinical Experiences with a Patient Skin Dose Monitoring and Tracking Program

RaySafe X2. Effortless measurements of X-ray

Dosepix Detector as kvp-meter in Radiology and Mammography: First steps

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them?

Suppression of metal artifacts using image-based monoenergetic DECT imaging

CHAPTER 2 COMMISSIONING OF KILO-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY

Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models

Nuclear Associates

Introduction. Chapter 16 Diagnostic Radiology. Primary radiological image. Primary radiological image

T h e P h a n t o m L a b o r a t o r y

Aim. Images for this section: Page 2 of 13

Radiation Dose Modulation. the Multidetector CT Era: From Basics to Practice 1

TESTING FLAT-PANEL IMAGING SYSTEMS: What the Medical Physicist Needs to Know. JAMES A. TOMLINSON, M.S., D.A.B.R. Diagnostic Radiological Physicist

abc MHRA Philips Mx8000 IDT CT scanner technical evaluation September 2004 Best choice best practice nww.medical-devices.nhs.

Advanced Noise Reduction Processing for X-ray CT System with Iterative Processing. Koichi Hirokawa MEDIX VOL. 56 P.43 P.46

Projection Data and Scanograms in X-ray Computed Tomography

8/2/2017. Radiologist Responsibilities. Radiologist Responsibilities. Medical Physicist Mammography Equipment Evaluation and Annual Survey

Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality

X-rays. X-rays are produced when electrons are accelerated and collide with a target. X-rays are sometimes characterized by the generating voltage

Model Based Iterative Reconstructions represent a paradigm shift - Imaging with almost no noise

Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over

January 2012 February 1, Release Date: Expiration Date:

NeuViz 16 Computed Tomography. Elevating routine imaging for exceptional results

Maximum Performance, Minimum Space

REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENCE HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO QUALITY CONTROL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS

Dose Reduction in Helical CT: Dynamically Adjustable z-axis X-Ray Beam Collimation

Clinical Importance on CT

Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space. Answers for life.

Radiology Physics Lectures: Digital Radiography. Digital Radiography. D. J. Hall, Ph.D. x20893

Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of

Nuclear Associates

THE ART OF THE IMAGE: IDENTIFICATION AND REMEDIATION OF IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN MAMMOGRAPHY

DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook

7/20/2014. Outline. Outline. Disclosures. Learning Objectives. SBB: Practical Aspects of ACR Accreditation, QC and ACR On Site Surveys

An Activity in Computed Tomography

Improvement of CT image quality with iterative reconstruction idose4

Related topics Beam hardening, cupping effect, Beam hardening correction, metal artefacts, photon starvation

Nuclear Associates , , CT Head and Body Dose Phantom

X-ray Tube and Generator Basic principles and construction

Outline. Digital Radiography. Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality. Dose Control

CT Basics: Equipment and Instrumentation Module 2

7/24/2014. Image Quality for the Radiation Oncology Physicist: Review of the Fundamentals and Implementation. Disclosures. Outline

Published text: Institute of Cancer Research Repository Please direct all s to:

PET: New Technologies & Applications, Including Oncology

Measurement of table feed speed in modern CT

Influence of different iteration levels in fourth generation iterative reconstruction technique on image noise in CT examinations of the neck

An Activity in Computed Tomography

Software and Hardware in CCTA. Elly Castellano PhD

Learning Objectives: What s my motivation? (unknown screen actor) Workshop Overview

of sufficient quality and quantity

Brilliance in everything Philips CT products and services

Surveying and QC of Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Units for ACR Accreditation

Transcription:

RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS 2011 Raphex diagnostic examination Adel A. Mustafa, Ph.D., Editor PUBLISHED FOR: RAMPS (Radiological and Medical Physics Society of New York)

preface The RAPHEX Diagnostic exam 2011 was prepared by members of the Radiological and Medical Physics Society of New York (RAMPS, Inc.), the New York chapter of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). The exam format was changed in 2009 to match the syllabi for teaching Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology residents published by the AAPM s Subcommittee for Review of Radiation Physics Syllabi for Residents (RRPSR). The numbers of questions for each subject are approximately related to the number of teaching hours allocated to each subject. Exam committee: Adel Mustafa, Ph.D., Editor Maynard High, Ph.D., Reviewer Stephen Balter, Ph.D., Reviewer John Humm, Ph.D., Reviewer Lawrence Rothenberg, Ph.D., Reviewer Pat Zanzonico, Ph.D., Reviewer Barry Rosenstein, Ph.D., Contributor If you are taking RAPHEX under exam conditions, your proctor will give you instructions on how to fill out your examinee and site IDs on the answer sheet. You have 3 HOURS to complete the exam. Non-programmable calculators may be used. Choose the most complete and appropriate answer to each question. We urge residents to review the exam with their physics instructors. Any comments or corrections are appreciated and should be sent to: Adel Mustafa, Ph.D. Raphex Chief Editor E-mail: adelmustafa@gmail.com Copyright 2011 by RAMPS, Inc., the New York chapter of the AAPM. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher or the copyright holder. Published in cooperation with RAMPS by: Medical Physics Publishing 4513 Vernon Boulevard Madison, WI 53705-4964 1-800-442-5778 E-mail: mpp@medicalphysics.org Web: www.medicalphysics.org

diagnostic questions D1. What is a reasonable CTDI vol radiation dose from a CT perfusion scan? A. 2.5 mgy B. 25 mgy ANSWER C. 250 mgy D. 2500 mgy D2. A CT scanner displays a CTDI vol of 6 mgy for a typical 5-year-old abdomen technique. When the medical physicist measures the CTDI vol for the ACR accreditation, she finds it to be about 12 mgy. Why? A. Physicist used 2 the normal slice width in the measurement. B. Physicist used a 16-cm diameter phantom, but CT unit assumed 32-cm phantom. ANSWER C. Physicist used a lower kvp than normal. D. Physicist used a different than normal reconstruction algorithm. E. Physicist used a detector chamber that was too short to cover the unit multislice detector beam width. D3. Other than in mammography, what is the target material in x-ray tubes? A. Mo B. Rh ANSWER C. Gd D. W E. Pb D4. Thin, horizontal white streaks are seen in CT chest scans through the shoulders. How can these be reduced? A. Use rotational modulation of ma. B. Lower kvp. ANSWER C. Have service recalibrate detector. D. Use thinner slices. E. Use High Resolution Chest protocol. D5. Which of the following will increase the appearance of noise seen on a CT image? A. Change kvp from 120 to 140. B. Change slice width from 2.5 mm to 5 mm. ANSWER C. Change viewing window from 250 HU to 50 HU. D. Change pitch from 1.0 to 0.8. E. Change reconstruction algorithm from Bone to Standard body. D6. In a multislice detector CT the reconstructed slice width depends on: A. Rotation time. B. X-ray beam width. ANSWER C. Partial volume. D. Reconstruction algorithm. E. Detector width. Raphex 2011 1

D1. C The typical CTDI vol for CT perfusion is between 100 and 500 mgy. It is much higher than routine brain CT because it is a cine series of scans done with patient stationary. Raphex 2012 27

D2. B Some CT scanners incorrectly display the CTDI vol for pediatric abdomen studies, because they assume a 32-cm diameter patient whenever Body mode is chosen. The ACR accreditation calls for a 16-cm diameter phantom to be used, which is closer to a typical 5-year-old abdomen. CTDI vol does not change much with beam width, and even less with slice width. Lower kvp would give lower dose. Algorithm has no effect on dose. Too short detector chamber would give a too low dose. Raphex 2012 28

D3. D CT requires high x-ray flux per ma (x-ray yield goes up with Z) and high ma, high kvp, which produces high heat. W has a high melting point and high Z. Pb has a low melting point. Mo and Rh are used for mammography targets. Gd is used for x-ray detectors. Raphex 2012 29

D4. A These are noise streaks coming from photon starvation as the x-ray beam traverses the highly attenuating lateral views through the shoulders. Rotational modulation of ma AEC will increase the dose for those angular views where the patient is thick or dense. Lower kvp and thinner slices will result in lower dose per voxel, and noise will increase. High res chest uses very thin slice and high res algorithm, which will increase noise. Recalibration will only correct ring artifacts. There may also be thick dark streaks seen between highly attenuating bones these are beam-hardening artifacts. Raphex 2012 30

D5. C Narrowing the viewing window will increase displayed noise (and contrast) in image. All others will reduce noise. Raphex 2012 31

D6. E In multislice CT, the slice width is determined by the width of the detector elements in the z-direction. Adjacent rings of detectors are combined to allow different slice widths. The beam width must be at least as wide as all the slices from a single rotation combined. Partial volume does not affect slice width; it is an effect of wide slice width. Raphex 2012 32