Solutions: Lens Design I Part 2. Exercise 2-1: Apertures, stops and vignetting

Similar documents
Lens Design I Seminar 1

Solution of Exercises Lecture Optical design with Zemax for PhD Part 8

Exercises Advanced Optical Design Part 5 Solutions

Lens Design I Seminar 5

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

Solution of Exercises Lecture Optical design with Zemax Part 6

Lens Design I. Lecture 5: Advanced handling I Herbert Gross. Summer term

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

Tutorial Zemax 8: Correction II

Optical Design with Zemax

Exercise 1 - Lens bending

1.1 Singlet. Solution. a) Starting setup: The two radii and the image distance is chosen as variable.

Lens Design II Seminar 6 (Solutions)

Tutorial Zemax 3 Aberrations

Lens Design I. Lecture 5: Advanced handling I Herbert Gross. Summer term

Advanced Lens Design

Optical Design with Zemax for PhD - Basics

Optical Design with Zemax

Optical Design with Zemax for PhD

Tutorial Zemax Introduction 1

Lens Design I. Lecture 10: Optimization II Herbert Gross. Summer term

Sequential Ray Tracing. Lecture 2

Chapter 3. Introduction to Zemax. 3.1 Introduction. 3.2 Zemax

Tutorial Zemax 9: Physical optical modelling I

Lens Design I. Lecture 10: Optimization II Herbert Gross. Summer term

System/Prescription Data

Tolerancing in Zemax. Lecture 4

Some of the important topics needed to be addressed in a successful lens design project (R.R. Shannon: The Art and Science of Optical Design)

Exam Preparation Guide Geometrical optics (TN3313)

Lecture 4: Geometrical Optics 2. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Rays. Wavefronts. Aberrations. Outline

Computer exercise 2 geometrical optics and the telescope

OPTICAL IMAGING AND ABERRATIONS

Opti 415/515. Introduction to Optical Systems. Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn

Optical Design with Zemax for PhD

Introduction to Optical Modeling. Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena Institute of Applied Physics. Lecturer: Prof. U.D. Zeitner

Cardinal Points of an Optical System--and Other Basic Facts

Optical Engineering 421/521 Sample Questions for Midterm 1

Opto Engineering S.r.l.

Lens Design II. Lecture 3: Aspheres Herbert Gross. Winter term

3.0 Alignment Equipment and Diagnostic Tools:

OSLO Doublet Optimization Tutorial

WaveMaster IOL. Fast and Accurate Intraocular Lens Tester

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Why is There a Black Dot when Defocus = 1λ?


OPAC 202 Optical Design and Inst.

Using Stock Optics. ECE 5616 Curtis

Lens Design II. Lecture 2: Structural modifications Herbert Gross. Winter term

Imaging and Aberration Theory

Mechanical Tolerancing Results For the SALT/PFIS Collimator and Camera. January 24, 2003 J. Alan Schier

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Advanced Lens Design

Use of Computer Generated Holograms for Testing Aspheric Optics

Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing

Optimisation. Lecture 3

Design of Large Working Area F-Theta Lens. Gong Chen

Optical Components for Laser Applications. Günter Toesko - Laserseminar BLZ im Dezember

Big League Cryogenics and Vacuum The LHC at CERN

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Study on Imaging Quality of Water Ball Lens

ECEN. Spectroscopy. Lab 8. copy. constituents HOMEWORK PR. Figure. 1. Layout of. of the

WaveMaster IOL. Fast and accurate intraocular lens tester

Lens Design II. Lecture 11: Further topics Herbert Gross. Winter term

CATALOG LENS USE IN OSLO

Long Wave Infrared Scan Lens Design And Distortion Correction

INFLUENCE OF VARIABLE APERTURE STOP

Magnification, stops, mirrors More geometric optics

USE OF COMPUTER- GENERATED HOLOGRAMS IN OPTICAL TESTING

October 7, Peter Cheimets Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 60 Garden Street, MS 5 Cambridge, MA Dear Peter:

Exam 4. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

ME 297 L4-2 Optical design flow Analysis

Beam expansion standard concepts re-interpreted

Section A Conceptual and application type questions. 1 Which is more observable diffraction of light or sound? Justify. (1)

Some lens design methods. Dave Shafer David Shafer Optical Design Fairfield, CT #

GEOMETRICAL OPTICS AND OPTICAL DESIGN

Speed and Image Brightness uniformity of telecentric lenses

This experiment is under development and thus we appreciate any and all comments as we design an interesting and achievable set of goals.

Optical Design with Zemax

Lens Design II. Lecture 11: Further topics Herbert Gross. Winter term

Chapter Ray and Wave Optics

Actually, you only need to design one monocular of the binocular.

Phys 531 Lecture 9 30 September 2004 Ray Optics II. + 1 s i. = 1 f

NON-NULL INTERFEROMETER FOR TESTING OF ASPHERIC SURFACES. John J. Sullivan. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the COLLEGE OF OPTICAL SCIENCES

Testing Aspheric Lenses: New Approaches

CODE V Introductory Tutorial

Optical Design of an Off-axis Five-mirror-anastigmatic Telescope for Near Infrared Remote Sensing

Lenses Design Basics. Introduction. RONAR-SMITH Laser Optics. Optics for Medical. System. Laser. Semiconductor Spectroscopy.

PHY 431 Homework Set #5 Due Nov. 20 at the start of class

Finite conjugate spherical aberration compensation in high numerical-aperture optical disc readout

The optical analysis of the proposed Schmidt camera design.

CHAPTER 1 Optical Aberrations

Supplemental Materials. Section 25. Aberrations

06SurfaceQuality.nb Optics James C. Wyant (2012) 1

Conformal optical system design with a single fixed conic corrector

Katarina Logg, Kristofer Bodvard, Mikael Käll. Dept. of Applied Physics. 12 September Optical Microscopy. Supervisor s signature:...

EP 324 Applied Optics. Topic 3 Lenses. Department of Engineering of Physics Gaziantep University. Oct Sayfa 1

Lens Design II. Lecture 8: Special correction topics Herbert Gross. Winter term

Image Formation. Light from distant things. Geometrical optics. Pinhole camera. Chapter 36

Lens Design II. Lecture 3: Aspheres Herbert Gross. Winter term

Optical design of a high resolution vision lens

Transcription:

2016-04-25 Prof. Herbert Gross Mateusz Oleszko, Norman G. Worku Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Applied Physics Albert-Einstein-Str 15 07745 Jena Solutions: Lens Design I Part 2 Exercise 2-1: Apertures, stops and vignetting Load the achromate out of the lens catalog from the vendor Comar with a focal length f = 100mm called 100_DQ_25. Set the Entrance Pupil Diamter to EPD=20mm and insert the field points 0, 3 and 5. Vary the position of the stop. a) With the stop surface at the rear lens surface a. Generate the wavefront map without ray aiming b. Generate the wavefront map with ray aiming b) With the stop surface at the front focal plane Solution: a)a. a. Generate the wavefront map without vignetting b. Generate the wavefront map with vignetting

a)b.

b)a.

b)b. Open field and click set vignetting

Exercise 2-2: Paraxial system layout a) Suppose a divergent ray bundle with numerical aperture of NA = 0.2 at the wavelength = 500 nm. Establish a first paraxial lens with a focal length to get a collimated beam with diameter 24 mm. b) After a distance of 10 mm a second paraxial lens with focal length f2 = 30 mm fousses the ray. Behind the focal point a third paraxial lens should collimated the beam again for a diameter of 36 mm. c) Now in a distance of 20 mm a foxussing oaraxial lens with focal lengt f = 100 is added. Finally a negative lens with f = -70 mm is added in an appropriate distance to change the numericalaperture in the image space to 0.05. Find the final image distance. What ist the magnification of the system? Solution: a) Wavelength and numerical aperture are inserted. Then we set the focal length by a pickup to have the same value as the first object distance. This guarantees a collimated output beam. In the merit function a PARY value of D/2 = 12 mm is required, the first distance is variable. Alternatively without using the optimization, the value can be calculated by hand with tan(u) = sin(u)/cos(u) = D/2/f = 58.788 mm or approximated with the slider. b) The 3rd lens must have a focal length of 36/24 x 30 = 45 mm. The air distances are correspondingly.

c) A second optimization selects the distance of lens 4 to obtain the numerical aperture by PARB to be 0.05. The image distance is obtained by QUICK FOCUS. Thelens data ar The magnification is 0.2 / 0.05 = 4.

Exercise 2-3: Grating spectrometer A linear grating with a line density of 0.3 Lp/ m is illuminated by a collimated beam with a spectral broad wavelength between 400 nm and 700 nm. The grating is blazed and is used in the +1 st order. The spectrum is observed in a sensor plane, which is obtained after a symmetrical bi-convex lens with focal length f = 100 mm, a thickness of10 mm and SF6 as material in a telecentric arrangement. a) Set the system in Zemax b) What is the spreading of the spectrum in the sensor plane? Solution: a) System data and layout b) If a single raytrace is made for the extreme wavelengths 400 nm and 700 nm, one gets the ray heights in the sensor plane of 11.29 mm and 21.36 mm. Therefore the spectral spreading is y = 10.07 mm.

Exercise 2-4: CPP expressed in Zernike polynomials A cubic phase plate can be used to enhance the depth of focus. It is described by the simple polynomial 3 3 W( x, y) x y in normalized pupil coordinates and can be expressed by a superpostion of Zernike functions in the Fringe convention as W( x, y) 2 Z2 2 Z3 Z7 Z8 Z10 Z11 4 a) Establish a simple system with an imcoming collimated beam at the wavelength = 546 nm, a diameter D = 7 mm and a focussing perfect lens of focal length f = 100 mm. A thin plane parallel plate of BK7 with thickness t = 5 mm is used as a phase plate. To get this functionality, one side is shaped as a Zernike surface according to the representation above with a normalization radius of 3.5 mm. The constant should be 0.0080. Visualize the surface contour of the cubic phase plate. b) Calculate the variation of the spot size over a defocus range of -20...+20 mm. Find the extended depth of focus, which should be defined as the interval, where the rms-spot is doubled in comparison to the best image plane. c) Calculate the shape of the spot in the best image plane and at a distance of z = 95 mm. What is observed? Calculate the MTF of the system in the surface representation for all azimuthal angles. What is the transfer behavior for different rotational settings of a bar pattern? d) Try to model the phase plate with another aspherical surface representation in Zemax. Solution: a) System with a Zernike Sag surface in Fringe convention with 11 terms, a normalization radius of 3.5 mm and the corresponding values. The user defined semi aperture in the lens datza editor should have teh same value as the normalization radius in the extra data editor. The surface sag is illustrated here:

Comment: According to the manual, it is also possible to select the Zernike phase surface type. In this case, the substrate surface, where the ray deviation takes place, remains unchanged (plane). In the current case of small deviations, thisis equivalent. The scaling in this case is on the one side more complicated (a factor of 2 has to be taken into acount, the phase is scaled in radiant), on the other side, a common prefactor M can be used to scale the complete surface by changing only one number corresponding to the number in the above formula). b) By using a universal plot with the spot diameter as criterion, we get the two plots The minimum spot size is 0.1774 mm. The double value is obtained for z = 87 mm, therefore the depth of focus is 26 mm. c) The spot diagram in the best image plane at z = 100 mm and for z = 110 mm look as follows

The spot is quite large and is of triangular shape. There is only s small change in size for this defocussing. The MTF looks like the following figure. It is seen, that the transfer behavior is quite good for structures oriented along the x- and y-axis, but for rotated structures, the resolution is quite bad. d) The surface list offers an EXTENDED POLYNOMIAL surface, which in principle is a 2-dimensional Taylor expansion in x and y. This representation can be used to describe the cubic phase plate by

selecting a normalization radius of 5 mm and taking 9 terms. The coefficients X0Y3 and X3Y0 are chosen with the same coefficient 0.008. The surface sag is identical to the model above.