Active Sonar Wrap-up Exercise (Everyone should attempt to do the following problems and we will go over them in class.)

Similar documents
Modeling of underwater sonar barriers

Burial Depth Determination of Cables Using Acoustics Requirements, Issues and Strategies

Analysis of the Detectability of Sonar Under the Virtual Battlefield

ORE 654 Applications of Ocean Acoustics. Homework Problem Set #2. Assigned 27 October 2011 Due 10 November 2011

Exploiting nonlinear propagation in echo sounders and sonar

Modeling high-frequency reverberation and propagation loss in support of a submarine target strength trial

Tackling the Sonar Equation

Radiated Noise of Research Vessels

The Impact of Very High Frequency Surface Reverberation on Coherent Acoustic Propagation and Modeling

HIGH RESOLUTION MULTI-BEAM SIDE LOOKING SONAR ANDRZEJ ELMINOWICZ, LEONARD ZAJĄCZKOWSKI

Signals and systems in Underwater Acoustics: listen through the ocean

Shallow Water Array Performance (SWAP): Array Element Localization and Performance Characterization

Ship source level. Aleksander Klauson, Janek Laanearu, Mirko Mustonen. Gothenburg, 01 June 2016

ONR Graduate Traineeship Award in Ocean Acoustics for Sunwoong Lee

Shallow water limits to hydro-acoustic communication baud rate and bit energy efficiency

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S *

Geophysical Applications Seismic Reflection Surveying

A Bistatic HF Radar for Current Mapping and Robust Ship Tracking

Three-dimensional investigation of buried structures with multi-transducer parametric sub-bottom profiler as part of hydrographical applications

Backscatter Estimation Using Broadband Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers

Outline. Introduction to Sonar. Outline. History. Introduction Basic Physics Underwater sound INF-GEO4310. Position Estimation Signal processing

Ongoing Developments in Side Scan Sonar The pursuit of better Range, Resolution and Speed

NETW 701: Wireless Communications. Lecture 5. Small Scale Fading

Ocean Ambient Noise Studies for Shallow and Deep Water Environments

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS UNDERWATER TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR THE ADCF UPKEEP PROJECT (BSMI 2333)

Using Sound Diffraction to Determine the Seabed Slope

TIME VARIABLE GAIN FOR LONG RANGE SONAR WITH CHIRP SOUNDING SIGNAL

ECE 678 Radar Engineering Fall 2018

@mit.edu Ballard

Broadband Temporal Coherence Results From the June 2003 Panama City Coherence Experiments

ON WAVEFORM SELECTION IN A TIME VARYING SONAR ENVIRONMENT

Chapter 1: Telecommunication Fundamentals

High-Frequency Rapid Geo-acoustic Characterization

TREX13 data analysis/modeling

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *

Low probability of detection underwater acoustic communications for mobile platforms

Radiated Noise of Research Vessels

REPORT ITU-R M Interference and noise problems for maritime mobile-satellite systems using frequencies in the region of 1.5 and 1.

Theory and Implementation of Advanced Signal Processing for Active and Passive Sonar Systems

Can Russian Strategic Submarines Survive at Sea? The Fundamental Limits of

APPLICATION OF DDS AND MAGNETIC BARRIER COOPERATING WITH ACOUSTIC BARRIERS AND TETHERED SONOBUOYS FOR HARBOUR AND ANCHORAGE UNDERWATER PROTECTION

SWAMSI: Bistatic CSAS and Target Echo Studies

International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Technology, Vol 3, Issue 1, January- 2014

not overpower the audience just below and in front of the array.

Sonar advancements for coastal and maritime surveys

Introduction to sonar

Introduction to Radar Systems. Clutter Rejection. MTI and Pulse Doppler Processing. MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Radar Course_1.ppt ODonnell

Ultrasound Physics. History: Ultrasound 2/13/2019. Ultrasound

AN ACOUSTIC PIPELINE TRACKING AND SURVEY SYSTEM FOR THE OFFSHORE

The Radio Channel. COS 463: Wireless Networks Lecture 14 Kyle Jamieson. [Parts adapted from I. Darwazeh, A. Goldsmith, T. Rappaport, P.

Acoustic propagation affected by environmental parameters in coastal waters

EE 529 Remote Sensing Techniques. Radar

Wavelength-shifting Optical Module (WOM)

Environmental Noise Propagation

Synthesis of acoustic images of underwater targets

Mid-Frequency Reverberation Measurements with Full Companion Environmental Support

SONOGRAPHIC PHYSICS, INSTRUMENTATION & DOPPLER REVIEW Part 3

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Benthowave Instrument Inc.

Anthropogenic noise measurements and impacts for assessment of the marine environment

1 Introduction A 3 model The Y-chart model Application description Preliminary specfications... 10

Lecture 9. Radar Equation. Dr. Aamer Iqbal. Radar Signal Processing Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti

HMS-12M. HMS-12M Broadband Hull-Mounted Minehunting Sonar ATLAS ELEKTRONIK. ... a sound decision. Mine Warfare System

Annex 5. Determination of the interference field strength in the Land Mobile Service

FEASIBILITY STUDY ON FULL-DUPLEX WIRELESS MILLIMETER-WAVE SYSTEMS. University of California, Irvine, CA Samsung Research America, Dallas, TX

The Study of Sonar for Imaging of the Solid-Liquid Interface Inside Large Tanks

Navigational Echo Sounder

Application Note: Sidescan Sonar Beamwidth.

An Overview Algorithm to Minimise Side Lobes for 2D Circular Phased Array

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Prediction of sky-wave field strength at frequencies between about 150 and khz

Review of Filter Types

Antennas and Propagation

Radar Reprinted from "Waves in Motion", McGourty and Rideout, RET 2005

Tunable Multi Notch Digital Filters A MATLAB demonstration using real data

Technical Notes Volume 1, Number 25. Using HLA 4895 modules in arrays: system controller guidelines

Insights Gathered from Recent Multistatic LFAS Experiments

Radar Systems Engineering Lecture 12 Clutter Rejection

Indoor Positioning with UWB Beamforming

Satellite Navigation Principle and performance of GPS receivers

Outline. History of Underwater Acoustics

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A BROADBAND PERFORMANCE MODEL

3.2 Measuring Frequency Response Of Low-Pass Filter :

Bio-Alpha off the West Coast

DAMs Universal Link Commander

High Frequency Acoustic Channel Characterization for Propagation and Ambient Noise

Chapter 17 Waves in Two and Three Dimensions

Lab S-3: Beamforming with Phasors. N r k. is the time shift applied to r k

Scalable Ionospheric Analyser SIA 24/6

Dual Use Multi-Frequency Radar For Current Shear Mapping and Ship Target Classification

Performance assessment of the MUSCLE synthetic aperture sonar

Agenda. Tuesday, 16 March (all times approximate!) Workshop logistics Workshop goals Brief background on SAX99 and SAX04

Impact of Beam Divergence on the Performance of Free Space Optical System

ECE 476/ECE 501C/CS Wireless Communication Systems Winter Lecture 6: Fading

The Physics of Echo. The Physics of Echo. The Physics of Echo Is there pericardial calcification? 9/30/13

Acoustics Digital, Spread Spectrum, DSP, Wideband What does this mean for Real World DP Operations? Jonathan Davis Sonardyne Inc

Introduction to Radar Systems. The Radar Equation. MIT Lincoln Laboratory _P_1Y.ppt ODonnell

Wireless Channel Propagation Model Small-scale Fading

ACOUSTIC REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION EXPERIMENTS FROM 4.5 TO 50 KHZ AT THE SEDIMENT ACOUSTICS EXPERIMENT 2004 (SAX04)

27/11/2013' OCEANOGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS. Acoustic Current Meters

Design and Performance Simulation of a Ku-Band Rotating Fan-Beam Scatterometer

Transcription:

Active Sonar Wrap-up Exercise (Everyone should attempt to do the following problems and we will go over them in class.) Name: 1. You are on a new Seawolf class submarine with the sonar system and the environment described below. Calculate the max range for detecting another submerged submarine given the following for both the noise-limited and reverberation-limited cases: Environmental Data c = 1500 m/s, Wind Speed = 6 kts Shipping = heavy Assume TL is only due to spherical spreading; neglect attenuation losses Submarine's Sonar Data: Linear Array = 3 m long frequency = 10 khz bandwidth = 5 Hz pulse length = 10 ms Maximum Input Electrical power to transducer 100 W Active Sonar system efficiency 8% DI T = 16 db DI = 16 db desired p(d) = 90% desired p(fa) = 0.01% assume ideal processor NL self = 45 db Target Data (adversary): TS = 0 db depth = 300 ft @ night ASWUE-1

. Your ship uses active sonar in an attempt to locate a friendly 688-class submarine operating near the surface,000 yds away. Given the following: transition range = 1,000 yds, α = 1.08 db/kyd, SL = 73 db, NL = 7 db, DI = 10 db, RL A = 63 db, TS = 14 db and DT = 16 db, determine the following showing all calculations: (Note that attenuation is a consideration in this problem.) a) The strongest type of reverberation would most likely be: volume reverberation / surface reverberation b) One-way total transmission loss (TL)? c) Signal-to-noise level (L ) received? d) Signal excess? e) Can your ship successfully detect the 688 sub? ASWUE-

Active Sonar Wrap Up Exercise Problem #1 You are on a new Seawolf class submarine with the sonar system and the environment described below. Calculate the max range for detecting another submerged submarine given the following for both the noise-limited and reverberation-limited cases: Environmental Data c = 1500 m/s, Wind Speed = 6 kts Shipping = heavy Assume TL is only due to spherical spreading; neglect attenuation losses Submarine's Sonar Data: Linear Array = 3 m long frequency = 10 khz bandwidth = 5 Hz pulse length = 10 ms Maximum Input Electrical power to transducer 100 W Active Sonar system efficiency 8% DI T = 16 db DI = 16 db desired p(d) = 90% desired p(fa) = 0.01% assume ideal processor NLself = 45 db Detection Threshold d = 6 d DT = 10log T f 6 DT = 10log = 4.1dB 0.010s ( 5Hz) Target Data (adversary): TS = 0 db depth = 300 ft @ night Volume Reverberation Case Volume Reverberation L = SL TL + TS RL > DT V [ ] RL = SL TL+ 10log s + 10log V v ( ( v) [ ]) L = SL TL + TS SL TL + 10log s + 10log V > DT [ ] L = TS 10log s 10log V > DT v L = 0dB 76dB 10log V > 4.1 10log ( V) = 71.9dB cτ V=ψr Reverberation Volume 7.19 cτ V= 10 =ψr λ= c 1500m / s 0.15m f = 10000Hz = λ.15m ψ= 1.3 = 1.3 = 0.066 L 3m 7.19 1500m / s 0.01s V = 10 = 0.066r r = 5600m Noise Limited Case L = SL TL + TS NL DI > DT SL = 171.5 db + 10log P + 10log E + DI SL = 171.5 db + 10log ( 100W) + 10log (.8) + 16dB = 1.8dB sea state NL = NL NL self E amb NL = 36 + 10log 5 = 4dB 4.5 4. NL = 45dB 4db = 10log 10 + 10 = 46.8dB T 1

Active Sonar Wrap Up Exercise Noise Finding the Range L = SL TL + TS NL DI > DT 1.8 40 log r + 0 ( 46.8 16) = 4.1 40 log r = 177.9 r = 8000m Problem # Your ship uses active sonar in an attempt to locate a friendly 688-class submarine operating near the surface,000 yds away. Given the following: transition range = 1,000 yds, α = 1.08 db/kyd, SL = 73 db, NL = 7 db, DI = 10 db, RL A = 63 db, TS = 14 db and DT = 16 db, determine the following showing all calculations: (Note that attenuation is a consideration in this problem.) The strongest type of reverberation would most likely be: volume reverberation / surface reverberation One-way total transmission loss (TL)? Signal-to-noise level (L) received? Signal excess? Can your ship successfully detect the 688 sub? Transmission Loss r 3 TL = 0log ro + 10log +α( rx10 ) ro 000 TL = 0log1000 + 10log + 1.08db / kyd ( kyd) = 108dB 1000 Noise/Reverb NL DI = 7dB 10dB = 6dB RLs = 63dB Neither is more significant Noise = 6dB 63dB = 65.5dB Signal Excess L = SL TL + TS NOISE > DT L = 73 108 + 14 65.5 = 5.5dB > 16dB Not dedectable at 000 yds SE = L DT = 5.5dB 16dB = 10.5dB

Names: Active Sonar Homework Section: All data given purely for test purposes and do not necessarily reflect reality. You are on a deep submergence vehicle searching the ocean floor for a Russian torpedo that was lost at sea. You have lost electrical power in your DSV and the Mother Ship is searching for you with the active sonar described below to recover you before you run out of oxygen. Environmental Data: Active Sonar Data: Wind speed = 6 kts Circular plane/piston array radius=.4 m Shipping - Heavy θ = 0. radians Assume TL is only due to Operating frequency = 5 khz spherical spreading; neglect Bandwidth = 5 Hz attenuation losses Pulse length = 6 ms During daytime NL self = 15 db P(FA) = 1% DSV Data: P(D) = 75% TS = + 1.0 db (Assume ideal receiver) Depth = 1500 feet, 500 feet above Efficiency = 90% ocean floor P E = 750 W Beam axis can be steered from 30º above to 60º below the horizontal 1. What is the directivity index of the mother ship s active sonar s array?. What is the Detection Threshold? 3. What is the Volume Scattering Strength for this daytime rescue? ASHW-1

4. What is the maximum detection range if the active sonar system is reverberation limited? 5. Find the projector source level of the Mother Ship s active sonar? 6. What is the reverberation level if the Mother Ship is 8,000 yards from the DSV? ASHW-

7. What is the total Noise Level due to both ambient and self noise? 8. Is the Mother Ship s active sonar reverberation or noise limited if range is 8,000 yards? 9. Calculate the surface reverberation level if the Mother Ship transmits such that grazing angle with surface is 40º and range is 6,000 yds? ASHW-3