OLFAR Orbiting Low-Frequency Antennas for Radio Astronomy. Mark Bentum

Similar documents
Radioastronomy in Space with Cubesats

Astronomical Antenna for a Space Based Low Frequency Radio Telescope

Solar Observing Low-frequency Array for Radio Astronomy (SOLARA)

DARIS, A FLEET OF PASSIVE FORMATION FLYING SMALL SATELLITES FOR LOW FREQUENCY RADIO ASTRONOMY. tel: ,

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

Low Frequency Radio Astronomy from the Lunar Surface

Space-based aperture array for ultra-long wavelength radio astronomy

Smart Antennas in Radio Astronomy

Beyond CubeSats: Operational, Responsive, Nanosatellite Missions. 9th annual CubeSat Developers Workshop

Radio Astronomy Transformed

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Introduction to Radio Astronomy

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

Propagation effects (tropospheric and ionospheric phase calibration)

LOFAR: Special Issues

Relative Navigation, Timing & Data. Communications for CubeSat Clusters. Nestor Voronka, Tyrel Newton

FORMATION FLYING PICOSAT SWARMS FOR FORMING EXTREMELY LARGE APERTURES

Low-Profile Antenna Package for Efficient Inter-CubeSat Communication in S- and V-band. C. Vourch & T. Drysdale

40 Years of Planning for Radio Astronomy from Space and the Moon

From the Delfi-C3 nano-satellite towards the Delfi-n3Xt nano-satellite

CubeSat Integration into the Space Situational Awareness Architecture

Outernet: Development of a 1U Platform to Enable Low Cost Global Data Provision

Small Satellites: The Execution and Launch of a GPS Radio Occultation Instrument in a 6U Nanosatellite

(SDR) Based Communication Downlinks for CubeSats

LWA Station Design. S. Ellingson, Virginia Tech N. Kassim, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. URSI General Assembly Chicago Aug 11, 2008 JPL

SPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites

Assessment of RFI measurements for LOFAR

Removal of Radio-frequency Interference (RFI) from Terrestrial Broadcast Stations in the Murchison Widefield Array. A/Prof.

Towards SKA Multi-beam concepts and technology

ISIS Innovative Solutions In Space B.V.

UKube-1 Platform Design. Craig Clark

SNIPE mission for Space Weather Research. CubeSat Developers Workshop 2017 Jaejin Lee (KASI)

May AA Communications. Portugal

EVLA System Commissioning Results

Workshop Summary: RFI and its impact on the new generation of HI spectral-line surveys

Dense Aperture Array for SKA

March Phased Array Technology. Andrew Faulkner

Planning (VLA) observations

Introduction to Radio Interferometry Sabrina Stierwalt Alison Peck, Jim Braatz, Ashley Bemis

Pulsar polarimetry. with. Charlotte Sobey. Dr. Aris Noutsos & Prof. Michael Kramer

Payload Configuration, Integration and Testing of the Deformable Mirror Demonstration Mission (DeMi) CubeSat

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

Deep Space Communication The further you go, the harder it gets. D. Kanipe, Sept. 2013

James M Anderson. in collaboration with Jan Noordam and Oleg Smirnov. MPIfR, Bonn, 2006 Dec 07

Aperture Arrays -Past, Present & Future!

Introduction to Radio Interferometry Anand Crossley Alison Peck, Jim Braatz, Ashley Bemis (NRAO)

A Technical Background of the ZACUBE-i Satellite Mission Series. Francois Visser

SKA-low and the Aperture Array Verification System

VLBI Post-Correlation Analysis and Fringe-Fitting

The SKA New Instrumentation: Aperture Arrays

Enhancing space situational awareness using passive radar from space based emitters of opportunity

Nanosatellite Technologies and Services

CanX-2 and NTS Canada's Smallest Operational Satellites

SULFRO: a Swarm of Nano-/Micro-Satellite at SE L2 for Space Ultra-Low Frequency Radio Observatory

Technology Development for The Lunar Radio Array

Introduction. Satellite Research Centre (SaRC)

Lecturer Series ASTRONOMY. FH Astros. Telecommunication with Space Craft. Kurt Niel (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria)

Reaching for the Stars

LOFAR - LOPES (prototype)

RFI Monitoring and Analysis at Decameter Wavelengths. RFI Monitoring and Analysis

More Radio Astronomy

Receiver Performance and Comparison of Incoherent (bolometer) and Coherent (receiver) detection

Radio Astronomy for Amateurs. Presented by Keith Payea AG6CI

I SARA 08/10/13. Pre-Decisional Information -- For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

ARRAY CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL POWER CALIBRATION FOR LEDA

Radio Frequency Monitoring for Radio Astronomy

MWA Antenna Description as Supplied by Reeve

GNSS Reflectometry and Passive Radar at DLR

THE OPS-SAT NANOSATELLITE MISSION

The First Station of the Long Wavelength Array

How to SPAM the 150 MHz sky

NanoSwarm: CubeSats Enabling a Discovery Class Mission Jordi Puig-Suari Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems

GEM Student Tutorial: Cubesats. Alex Crew

A model for the SKA. Melvyn Wright. Radio Astronomy laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, ABSTRACT

Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Space Systems Design and Test Laboratory

November SKA Low Frequency Aperture Array. Andrew Faulkner

ASTRON/LOFAR Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written consent of the 1au

Deep- Space Optical Communication Link Requirements

Design of a Free Space Optical Communication Module for Small Satellites

Data Digitization & Transmission Session Moderator: Chris Langley

RAX: The Radio Aurora explorer

First Results From the GPS Compact Total Electron Content Sensor (CTECS) on the PSSCT-2 Nanosat

The Primary Purpose of the School or Why Are We Here?

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for multi-beam radio astronomy

First Flight Results of the Delfi-C3 Satellite Mission

Submillimeter (continued)

Casper Instrumentation at Green Bank

Improving CubeSat Communications

Introduction to Radioastronomy: Interferometers and Aperture Synthesis

Picture of Team. Bryce Walker. Charles Swenson. Alex Christensen. Jackson Pontsler. Erik Stromberg. Cody Palmer. Benjamin Maxfield.

MULTICHANNEL INTERFERENCE MITIGATION FOR RADIO ASTRONOMY Spatial filtering at the WSRT Albert-Jan Boonstra 1;2 Alle-Jan van der Veen 2, Amir Leshem 2;

Near Earth space monitoring with LOFAR PL610 station in Borówiec

COTS ADAPTABLE MODULE FOR ATTITUDE DETERMINATION IN CUBESATS

SKA1 low Baseline Design: Lowest Frequency Aspects & EoR Science

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

Figure 1. Proposed Mission Operations Functions. Key Performance Parameters Success criteria of an amateur communicator on board of Moon-exploration

Minnesat: GPS Attitude Determination Experiments Onboard a Nanosatellite

A Multi-Fielding SKA Covering the Range 100 MHz 22 GHz. Peter Hall and Aaron Chippendale, CSIRO ATNF 24 November 2003

Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) siraelectro-optics

In the summer of 2002, Sub-Orbital Technologies developed a low-altitude

Transcription:

Orbiting Low-Frequency Antennas for Radio Astronomy Mark Bentum JENAM, April 22, 2009

Outline Presentation of a new concept for low frequency radio astronomy in space Why low frequencies? Why in space? Outline of the idea Issues

History of Low Frequency astronomy Karl Jansky's in 1932 20.5 MHz (14.5 m) at Bell labs Grote Reber continued radio astronomy work at 160 MHz (1.9 m) and observed the Sun, IO, Cygnus-A Jansky Reber

History of Low Frequency astronomy First radio telescopes operated at long wavelengths with low spatial resolution and very high system temperatures Radio astronomy quickly moved to higher frequencies with λ better spatial resolution ( θ = ) and lower system temperatures D

Low frequency Science One of the last unexplored frequency bands. Exploring the early cosmos at high hydrogen redshifts, the so-called dark-ages Discovery of planetary and solar bursts in other solar systems Tomographic view of space weather.. the unknown.. and for many other astronomical areas of interest

Current low frequency instruments VLA 74 MHz GMRT LOFAR LWA MWA and more

Difficulties with Low Frequency Interference observations on Earth Severe at low frequencies Phase coherence through ionosphere Corruption of coherence of phase on longer baselines Imperfect calibrator based gain calibration Isoplanatic Patch Problem: Calibration changes as a function of position

Interference Very crowded spectrum

Ionospheric Structure ~ 50 km <5 km > 5 km Compared to shorter λ: Maximum antenna separation: < 5 km (vs. >10 3 km) Phase coherence preserved Phase coherence corrupted Angular resolution: θ > 0.3 (vs. < 10-3 )

Example ionosphere VLA 74 MHz

Isoplanatic Patch Problem Standard self-calibration assumes single ionospheric solution across FOV: ϕi(t) Problems: differential refraction, image distortion, reduced sensitivity Solution: selfcal solutions with angular dependence ϕi(t) ϕi(t, α, δ) However: computational complex

OLFAR Want to observe the 0.3-30 MHz band (unique) So, if the ionosphere is a problem Space mission Aperture diameter of 10 100 kilometer distributed aperture synthesis array (eg. Multiple satellites) Autonomous system Distributed processing system Possible locations: moon-orbit, Earth-Moon L2, L4/5, outer space..

Previous low frequency missions RAE-A (Explorer 38) 1968 July 4 190 kilogram Earth orbit RAE- B (Explorer 49 1973 June 10 328 kilogram Moon orbit 25 khz to 13.1 MHz

Basic idea Nano satellites Formation flying Deployable antenna for the frequency band between 1 and 30 MHz Ultra-low power receivers Intra-satellite communication Autonomous distributed processing Using diversity techniques for downlink

Example Delfi-C3 Cubesats OLFAR

Cubesat Nanosatellite 1..3 kg 10x10x10 cm Approx. 1..3 W of power Payload for other missions

OLFAR system specifications Preliminary OLFAR system specs at least 1-10 MHz, preferably 0.3-30 Frequency range MHz Antennas dipole, tripole Number of antennas / satellites 50 Maximum baseline between 60 and 100 km Formation flying, investigate 2D and Configuration 3D Spectral resolution 1 khz Processing bandwidth t.b.d. 100 khz? Spatial resolution at 1 MHz 0.35 degrees for 60 km aperture Snapshot integration time 1 to 1000 s, dependent on deployment location Sensitivity confusion limited Instantaneous bandwidth to be determined Deployment location Earth orbit, moon orbit, moon far side?, L2 point

Program DARIS Distributed Aperture Array for Radio Astronomy in Space (ESA/ESTEC funded project) Concept study started OLFAR project Funding for phase-a currently under review (Dutch Science and Technology Funds)

How many satellites? OLFAR

Wavefront Overview 5 major subsystems: spacecraft antenna design frontend backend data transport

Satellite system LNA Filter A/D Pre processing Inter satellite link Correlation Mechanics and system engineering Absolute and relative navigation and attitude Inter-satellite link Active antenna system for low-frequency radio astronomy Sensors for relative attitude determination Star trackers for absolute attitude determination Constellation maintenance Correlation software and hardware Overall observation control D/A Upconvert and send to Earth

Some system aspects Antenna design for 1-30 MHz band Active LNA Receiver filtering, sampling, Timing, clocking (local and global) Localization Digital signal processing RFI mitigation Filtering Subband sampling Distributed correlation, tiedarray calculations Data transport Between individual nodes Corrrelated and/or tied array data to datacente Datahandling LOFAR as receptor Storage Post-processing Calibration

Locations Earth orbit Moon orbit L2 Outer space Design considerations: RFI from Earth Constellation control (absolute and relative position) Downlink to Earth

Shielding by the moon OLFAR

Antenna systems Astronomical observing antenna 0.3 30 MHz Wavelengths: 10-1000 meter! Aperture Inter satellite link Data rates (raw data bandwidth of 100 khz with 8 bits and all-to-all satellites is ~200 Mbps per satellite) Down link Data rate is ~ 20 Mbps in case of correlation in space. Possible use of diversity techniques

Formation flying Constellation must be limited to approx. 100 kilometers. Individual satellites can move slowly (as long as stable within integration time). Constraint: given the integration time and the accuracy of 1/20th of the wavelength within the integration time. 5 years of operation This is currently under research (we consider L2 and moon orbit at this moment).

Data processing OLFAR

Signal processing Centralized correlation, centralized downlink Correlation: Distributed Centralized Downlink Distributed Centralized

Signal processing Distributed correlation, Distributed downlink Correlation: Distributed Centralized Downlink Distributed Centralized

Signal processing Distributed correlation, Centralized downlink Correlation: Distributed Centralized Downlink Distributed Centralized

Example If case of 50 satellites 8 bit sampling Bandwidth of 10 MHz Integration time of 1 second Communicaton in bits/sec: Intersatellite Downlink Distributed correlation Distributed Transmission 235,2E+6 359,99E+3 Centralized Transmission 235,2E+6 18,0E+6

Planning 2009: concept study, start After that detailed system design with focus on main issues: Virtual distributed system and nano satellite architecture Radio architectures for the communication in distributed arrays in space distributed autonomous signal processing 2010/11: astronomical receiver in Delfi-N3xt 2013: flightunits available

Conclusions and future work OLFAR is a new concept of a low frequency radio telescope in space using small satellites. Correlation must be done in space. Distributed processing with centralized downlink transmission is the preferable option. Inter satellite link is the communication challenge. In 2010/2011 experiments with Delfi-N3xt. Future work: Simulate the constellations in Moon Orbit en L2 Virtual distributed system and nano satellite architecture Radio architectures for the communication in distributed arrays in space Distributed autonomous signal processing

Partners OLFAR

ASTRON Albert Jan Boonstra Jan Geralt bij de Vaate Wim van Cappellen Raj Thilak Rajan Mark Bentum Universiteit Twente Mark Bentum Arjan Meijerink Technical University Delft Eberhard Gill Chris Verhoeven Alle-Jan van der Veen Radboud University Marc Klein Wolt Heino Falcke Contributors: EADS Astrium Noah Saks ESA/ESTEC Kees van t Klooster Dutch Space Eric Boom ISIS Space Jeroen Rotteveel AEMICS Mark Boer SystematIC Bert Monna National Semiconductors Arie van Staveren Axiom IC Ed van Tuijl