Presentation of the 8 th Global Steering Committee (GSC8) outcomes

Similar documents
4 TH WEST EURASIA ANNUAL ROADMAP MEETING BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 2-4 APRIL 2013

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

Report OIE Animal Welfare Global Forum Supporting implementation of OIE Standards Paris, France, March 2018

The Sustainable Tourism Programme of the 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production

Update RCG5. TOPICS DATE (TBC) VENUE (TBC) 1 Food Safety April 2018 Azerbaijan Cancelled 2 Wildlife

The UNISDR Global Science & Technology Advisory Group for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

IP KEY SOUTH EAST ASIA ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOR 2018

Talking Points for. Mr. Rogelio Fernandez-Castilla Director Technical Support Division. at the

mathematics and technology, including through such methods as distance

Technical Assistance. Programme of Activities

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

United Nations Environment Programme 12 February 2019* Guidance note: Leadership Dialogues at fourth session of the UN Environment Assembly

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

Submission of UN Environment and the World Health Organization: The promotion of lead paint laws and enhanced actions towards 2020

Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

SBI/SBSTA: Parties move forward on economic diversification and just transition work

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

WHO Regulatory Systems Strengthening Program

WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Sixth Session, March 2004

Implementation of international standards: collaboration between the WTO and the three sisters (Codex, IPPC and OIE)

BC RC SC UNITED NATIONS. on Persistent. English only. Organic Pollutants. Certain. Eighth meeting. Their Disposal. Item. Geneva, 24 April 5 May 2017

Operational Objectives Outcomes Indicators

AAL2BUSINESS Towards successful commercialization of AAL solutions

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

13-17 OCTOBER 2008 AU/MIN/ CAMRMRD /4(I) ADDIS ABABA DECLARATION ON DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF AFRICA S MINERAL RESOURCES.

Draft Plan of Action Chair's Text Status 3 May 2008

FY18 CIF Business Plan and Budget (SUMMARY)

CREDITING-RELATED READINESS ACTIVITIES UNDER THE PMR: UPDATE AND SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS

UN Countries in the Flyway Partner Ramsar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology CONCEPT NOTE

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

PARIS, 7 March 2008 Original: English REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL ON THE UPDATING OF THE EVALUATION OF THE ANTICIPATION AND FORESIGHT PROGRAMME

BSSSC Annual Conference Resolution 2016

Climate Change response measures, and negotiations update

Nanomaterials: Applications, Implications and Safety Management in the SAICM Context Rob Visser

PACIFIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY GROUP TO UNISDR (PSTAG)

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Informal document WP.5 (2016) No. 9

SHTG primary submission process

DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE NEXT PHASE OF THE PARTNERSHIP FOR MARKET READINESS (PMR) PMR Note PA

An Essential Health and Biomedical R&D Treaty

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

Welcome to the webinar

IV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

E Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/TDD/2017/IG.1/6 31 January 2017 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ARABIC

ECA Statement on the 2010 World Programme of Population and Housing Censuses at the UN Statistical Commission

Towards malaria elimination: ADB-supported work at Myanmar FDA

United Nations Environment Programme

The work under the Environment under Review subprogramme focuses on strengthening the interface between science, policy and governance by bridging

Society of Petroleum Engineers Applied Technical Workshop Digital Transformation in E&P: What s Next, Ready to Scale-Up? Sponsorship Proposal

Joint Work Plan between

2nd Call for Proposals

EuropeAid. Sustainable and Cleaner Production in the Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan (SCI-Pak)

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Fielding of Consultants 04 September November February July 2004

PROJECT DOCUMENT PROPOSED ACTIVITY FOR YEAR 2015 AND ACHIEVEMENTS FOR YEAR Project id: Program Categories:

DoReMi-MELODI Training and Education Forum Introduction and background

MEDLAB Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. Panagiotis Georgopoulos Region of Central Macedonia

IIED s Artisanal and Small-scale Mining (ASM) Knowledge Programme

National Governments. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage AK 99503

STRATEGIC ORIENTATION FOR THE FUTURE OF THE PMR:

WIPO Development Agenda

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Trade facilitation in the context of the SPS Agreement

TERMS OF REFERENCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE NORTHERN CAPE CHESS

1. OIE information system. 2. Wildlife notification s improvements in WAHIS. 3. WAHIS Wild online notification system

Vital Statistics from Civil Registration Records

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

WSIS+10 REVIEW: NON-PAPER 1

WFEO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (WFEO-CEIT) STRATEGIC PLAN ( )

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

NZFSA Policy on Food Safety Equivalence:

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

Civil Registration & Vital Statistics (CRVS) and The Pacific Vital Statistics Action Plan (PVSAP)

The Republic of Korea s Submission on the Scope and Modalities for the Periodic Assessment of the Technology Mechanism.

An introduction to the 7 th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. Gorgias Garofalakis

Maldives: Strengthening Capacity for Operations Management

Euroregion Baltic. International Permanent Secretariat. Euroregion Baltic

The EU / LAC Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation (JIRI) Libardo Gutierrez Colciencias

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

ASD EUROSPACE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (SRTC)

PROJECT DOCUMENT ACHIEVEMENTS FOR YEAR 2015 AND PROPOSED ACTIVITY FOR YEAR 2016

United Nations Statistics Division Programme in Support of the 2020 Round of Population and Housing Censuses

ICSU as co-organising partner of the Science and Technology Major Group

IGF Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion - A Synthesis -

S&T roadmap and implementation strategy: Perspective from the DRR process

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

SUSTAINABLE OCEAN INITIATIVE: KEY ELEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD

APSEC President s Report

Transcription:

Presentation of the 8 th Global Steering Committee (GSC8) outcomes Session 1: Progress of GF TADs at Global, Regional and sub regional Levels Antonio Petrini Coordinator, GF TADs Global Secretariat

GSC8 meeting Eighth meeting of the GF TADs Global Steering Committee (GSC8) FAO Headquarters, Rome, October 27 28, 2015

GSC8 Recommendations (1/7) The Global Steering Committee recommends that: 1. The period for testing the reporting on the performance indicators (pilot period) be extended to a date to be defined by the Management Committee to ensure that all Regional Steering Committees contribute to the exercise; (i) the exercise be renewed with more relevant or a reduction of the number of Performance Indicators to manage easily the collection of data required for the exercise; (ii) guidelines for the data collection for Performance Indicators by countries will be useful for the quality control of the data and results; (iii) formal feedback on Performance Indicators be sent by each Regional Steering Committee to the Global GF TADs secretariat for analysis and improvement of the tool;

GSC8 Recommendations (2/7) 2. The sequential approach to identifying and prioritizing TADs on a regional/sub regional basis be published or made available and promoted as a tool to interested parties and stakeholders. The GSC affirms this approach should continue to take into account a participatory approach with professionals and stakeholders and include additional criteria such environmental, political aspects of diseases as well as existing tools on a pilot basis; 3. The emphasis on Rinderpest Post eradication activities continue in order to maintain global freedom from rinderpest; 4. FAO and OIE continue to persuade donors/resources partners to provide both organizations funds to support global strategies on FMD and PPR, and Rinderpest Post Eradication activities;

GSC8 Recommendations (3/7) 5. (i) Global Strategy on the control and eradication of PPR and recommendations adopted during the OIE FAO International Conference on Control and Eradication of PPR held in Abjidan (Côte d Ivoire) on 31 March 2 April 2015 be taken into account; (ii) Recommendations of the PPR Costing Strategy Experts meeting held at FAO HQ on 7 9 October 2015 be endorsed; (iii) PPR Governance at global level be quickly implemented with a Global PPR Secretariat reporting to the GF TADs Management and Global Steering Committees, and negotiations with donors/resource partners for resource mobilization should start as soon as possible using the mechanism already endorsed by FAO and OIE; (iv) inputs from the Regional GF TADs Steering Committee into the PPR Strategy governance at regional level should be encouraged; (v) application for official recognition by the OIE of the national control programme and free status be encouraged.

GSC8 Recommendations (4/7) 6. (i) Dog mediated rabies elimination is feasible and must be promoted; (ii) the use of Rabies vaccine bank be publicized in order to persuade donors/ resources partners to enhance their financial contribution and investment at national, sub regional and regional levels; 7. FAO and OIE promote RVF vaccine registration for countries at risk and the efforts to establish a Regional vaccine bank set up by the OIE with donors/resource partners support.

GSC8 Recommendations (5/7) 8. FAO and OIE should make efforts to capture information regarding FMD virus, PPR virus and vaccine holdings (laboratories, manufacturers) in a living database aiming at having updated knowledge on these diseases; 9. FAO and OIE strengthen efforts for the submission of TADs agent isolates to reference centres and make information available to the research and international community.

GSC8 Recommendations (6/7) 10. FAO and OIE continue to encourage Member Countries to report animal diseases and zoonoses in a timely manner and to work with donors to support efforts on the improvement of information and early warning systems as well as the use of new technologies; 11. The quality of the regional Steering committee activity reports should be improved and be sent on time; Presidents of the RSC is responsible for ensuring representation of the region at appropriate venues;

GSC8 Recommendations (7/7) 12. All GF TADs activities, including cross cutting tools (GLEWS+, OFFLU, CMC AH) important for the management of these activities, must be maintained and supported; 13. A new independent external evaluation of the GF TADs take place as soon as funds are available for this activity; ToR for this external evaluation be defined by the Management Committee and will include the request that the evaluators advise on the best way to request fund to donors for GF TADs activities. The next GF TADs Global Steering Committee meeting (GSC9) to be held in Paris, 8 9 November 2016.

Labelling attribution process (1/10) A. INTRODUCTION Objectives of this SOP: to establish a common procedure for labelling GF TADs meeting at national, sub regional, regional and global level as stated in the recommendations of the Seventh meeting of the GF TADs Global Steering Committee (GSC7, 29 30 October, 2014). When a meeting is labelled GF TADs, the GF TADs logo is apposed on the document of communication and programme of the meeting. Responsibility: When revising the Regional Action Plans this SOP should be taken into account.

Labelling attribution process (2/10) I. Global and multiregional level GF TADs is a mechanism for policy definition, coordination, information sharing and harmonisation and not an operational tool for programmes/projects implementation. As a consequence, GF TADs does not have a programmatic plan per se. Stakeholders and partners implementing strategies or programmes in animal health are encouraged to use the GF TADs platform for information exchange whenever appropriate, especially for activities which contribute to the GF TADs objectives, notably multiregional or continental programmes for the control of transboundary animal diseases.

Labelling attribution process (3/10) I. Global and multiregional level Relevant activities can be labelled GF TADs if implemented by FAO and OIE, (with and without WHO when relevant for zoonotic diseases in humans), or by third parties according to the procedure described below. If labelled GF TADs, the activities are under the overall guidance of the GF TADs Global Steering Committee and Management Committee. Organizations and stakeholders at global level might decide on an ad hoc basis if they want to have certain activities labelled as GF TADs activities. For labelling, the organizations are requested to bring a proposal for a GF TADs activity to the attention of the GF TADs Management Committee through the Global GF TADs Secretariat (Secretariat GF TADS@fao.org). For analysis of the proposal, the organizations are expected to present the proposed dates, venue and agenda and a summary of impact of the GF TADs labelled activity/ties proposal

Labelling attribution process (4/10) I. Global and multiregional level To be labelled GF TADs, an activity should meet the following criteria: o Address one of the priority diseases or topics of the GF TADs Global Action Plan; o Contribute to the expected results as listed in the Global Action Plan; o Avoid duplication or contradiction to any other multiregional or global activity and be in line with the GF TADs partners portfolios; o Have its effects maximized when implemented only at global or multiregional level. National activities cannot be labelled as GF TADs.

Labelling attribution process (5/10) I. Global and multiregional level Three categories of activities can receive the GF TADs labelling: Vertical = disease oriented activities; Horizontal = topic or issues oriented activities; and Core institutional activities, by definition to ensure the proper functioning of the global governance and platforms (MC, GSC and Global Secretariat; GF TADs Working Groups). In between the regular meetings of the MC and GSC, the GF TADs labelling of activities is done if necessary via an e consultation procedure on an ad hoc basis led by the Global GF TADs Secretariat.

Labelling attribution process (6/10) II. Regional and sub regional level At the regional level, GF TADs has five Regional Steering Committees (RSCs): for Africa, Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East. The GF TADs regions are organized according to the OIE regions and they are supported by Secretariats provided by the Regional OIE Representations. Activities can be labelled GF TADs if implemented under the umbrella of the GF TADs and thus receiving the guidance of the Regional and Global GF TADs Steering Committee. For the activities included into the list of topics addressed by the Global Action Plan (see point B.I.9), the request of labelling must be approved by the Management Committee. For others topics of specific regional interest, decision of labelling can be approved by the Regional Steering Committee.

Labelling attribution process (7/10) II. Regional and sub regional level Organisations and stakeholders in animal health are encouraged to use the GF TADs platform whenever appropriate according to the decision of the Regional Steering Committees, especially for activities which contribute to the Regional GF TADs objectives. Organisations and stakeholders in a specific region decide on an ad hoc basis if they want to have certain activities labelled as GF TADs activities. The organisations are requested to bring planned GF TADs activities to the attention of the GF TADs Regional Steering Committee via the GF TADs Regional Secretariat for their labelling. For analysis of the proposal, the organizations are expected to present the proposed dates, venue and agenda and a summary of impact of the GF TADs labelled activity/ties proposal.

Labelling attribution process (8/10) II. Regional and sub regional level According to the topic addressed, decision of labelling will be made by the Management Committee or by the Regional Steering Committee (see point B.II.3). If the labeling is accepted a short report and/or presentation will be done during the regular GF TADs Regional Steering Committee meetings. Activities labelled are included into progress reports presented by GF TADs Regional Secretariat during the regular GF TADs Regional Steering Committee meetings.

Labelling attribution process (9/10) II. Regional and sub regional level To be labelled GF TADs, the activity should meet the following criteria: o Address one of the priority diseases, emerging diseases of regional concern or topics of the GF TADs Regional Five year action plans; o Contribute to the expected results as listed in the regional Action Plan; o Avoid duplication of or contradiction to any other activity in the region, and be in line with the stakeholders portfolios in the region; o Have its effects maximised if implemented at regional rather than at national level, and two (cross border activities) or more countries (sub regional / regional activities) are involved; and o Be accepted by the Management Committee or by the GF TADs Regional Steering Committee during its regular meetings or an e consultation procedure on an ad hoc basis

Labelling attribution process (10/10) II. Regional and sub regional level REGION PRIORITY TADS Based on GF TADs Regional Action Plans ASIA SAARC FMD HPAI PPR ASEAN+3 FMD HPAI Rabies CSF SPC Preventive activities against TADs MAIN FOCUS ON: GLOBAL FMD HPAI PPR Rabies RVF RP (Posterad.) ASF

3 rd External evaluation of GF TADs initiative Terms of Reference Global objective o The overarching objective of the evaluation is to provide FAO and OIE as well as the initiative members with a reasoned and analytical assessment of the Initiative as a basis to guide its future development. o In particular, the evaluation should be conducted against widely accepted general evaluation criteria of relevance, appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, complementarity, impact and sustainability. Besides, in addition to assess the concrete outputs, outcomes and impact of the initiative, it will be important to examine the value added of working collaboratively for FAO and OIE and other partners.

GF TADs Web site