Advanced MSK MRI Protocols at 3.0T. Garry E. Gold, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Radiology Stanford University

Similar documents
Page 1 of 9. Protocol: adult_other_adni3_study_human_ge_3t_25w_ _ _1. 3 Plane Localizer. 3 Plane Localizer PATIENT POSITION

MRI Metal Artifact Reduction

Pulse Sequence Design and Image Procedures

MARP. MR Accreditation Program Quality Control Beyond Just the Scans and Measurements July 2005

Delivering Better Patient Care with SIGNA Architect

MRI Summer Course Lab 2: Gradient Echo T1 & T2* Curves

Background (~EE369B)

Pulse Sequence Design Made Easier

SIEMENS MAGNETOM Skyra syngo MR D13

Cardiac MR. Dr John Ridgway. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK

Philips Site Yearly Performance Evaluation Philips Openview 16-Jan-08. Table of Contents

(N)MR Imaging. Lab Course Script. FMP PhD Autumn School. Location: C81, MRI Lab B0.03 (basement) Instructor: Leif Schröder. Date: November 3rd, 2010

MR Basics: Module 8 Image Quality

MR Advance Techniques. Flow Phenomena. Class II

Principles of MRI EE225E / BIO265. Lecture 21. Instructor: Miki Lustig UC Berkeley, EECS. M. Lustig, EECS UC Berkeley

CARING DESIGN. PRACTICAL TECHNOLOGY.

MR in RTP. MR Data for Treatment Planning: Spatial Accuracy Issues, Protocol Optimization, and Applications (Preview of TG117 Report) Acknowledgements

MR Basics: Module 6 Pulse Sequences

Compact yet Sophisticated

Gradient Spoiling. Average balanced SSFP magnetization Reduce sensitivity to off-resonance. FFE, FISP, GRASS, GRE, FAST, Field Echo

Works-in-Progress package Version 1.0. For the SIEMENS Magnetom. Installation and User s Guide NUMARIS/4VA21B. January 22, 2003

TimTX TrueShape. The parallel transmit architecture of the future. Answers for life.

3T Unlimited. ipat on MAGNETOM Allegra The Importance of ipat at 3T. medical

Liver imaging beyond expectations with Ingenia

MR in Tx Planning. Acknowledgements. Outline. Overview MR in RTP

Module 2. Artefacts and Imaging Optimisation for single shot methods. Content: Introduction. Phase error. Phase bandwidth. Chemical shift review

ACRIN 6686 / RTOG 0825

H 2 O and fat imaging

MRI Anatomy and Positioning Series Module 12: Fat Suppression Techniques

2015 Spin echoes and projection imaging

HETERONUCLEAR IMAGING. Topics to be Discussed:

2014 M.S. Cohen all rights reserved

RAD 229: MRI Signals and Sequences

System/Imaging Imperfections

High Field MRI: Technology, Applications, Safety, and Limitations

1.5T HIGH FIELD SMALL ANIMAL MRI

Diff Ganzkörper ep2d_diff_stir_b50_800_tra

ISSN X CODEN (USA): PCHHAX. The role of dual spin echo in increasing resolution in diffusion weighted imaging of brain

BACKGROUND. ** 78% of all MRI scanners have Image Quality problems. *** *** 25% of all Multi-Channel RF coils have at least one bad channel.

MRI Systems and Coil Technology

GE Healthcare. Discovery MR T. Simply powerful. Powerfully simple.

SIGNA Explorer Lift revives our MR

Image Quality/Artifacts Frequency (MHz)

EE225E/BIOE265 Spring 2014 Principles of MRI. Assignment 6. Due Friday March 7th, 2014, Self Grading Due Monday March 10th, 2014

Radio Frequency Field

BOLD fmri: signal source, data acquisition, and interpretation

Pitfalls and Remedies of MDCT Scanners as Quantitative Instruments

Surpass the unimaginable and make it the expected.

SIGNA Architect. Make the unimaginable the expected. Issue Spotlight. Issue Spotlight

Pulse Sequences: Rapid Gradient Echo

SIGNA Pioneer: Ultra High Efficiency Gradient System Advancing the gradient technology curve

Lesson 06: Pulse-echo Imaging and Display Modes. These lessons contain 26 slides plus 15 multiple-choice questions.

k y 2k y,max k x 2k x,max

GE Site Yearly Performance Evaluation GE Signa Excite HD - 3T 1-Sep-08. Table of Contents

Simultaneous Multi-Slice (Slice Accelerated) Diffusion EPI

磁振影像學 MRI 磁振假影與磁振安全 磁振假影. 本週課程內容 Hardware-related Artifacts 盧家鋒助理教授 磁振假影 磁振安全

Improving high-field MRI using parallel excitation

Designing Long-T 2 Suppression Pulses for Ultra-short Echo Time (UTE) Imaging

Designing Long-T 2 Suppression Pulses for Ultrashort Echo Time Imaging

TOPICS: CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of Patient Age & Size and for Different CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions

WU-Minn HCP 1200 Subjects Release: Reference Manual

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Principles, Methods, and Techniques

EE469B: Assignment 1 Solutions

EE225E/BIOE265 Spring 2012 Principles of MRI. Assignment 7. Due March 16, 2012

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The ACR magnetic resonance accreditation phantom (ACR MRAP) has been designed to examine a broad range of instrument parameters.

Development of a 1.0 T MR microscope using a Nd-Fe-B permanent magnet

SmartExam helps to banish most repeat knee studies at Desert Medical Imaging

The Enlightened Choice for High-field MRI

EE225E/BIOE265 Spring 2011 Principles of MRI. Assignment 6 Solutions. (y 0 + vt) dt. 2 y 0T + 3 )

The SENSE Ghost: Field-of-View Restrictions for SENSE Imaging

Automatic Selection of Mask and Arterial Phase Images for Temporally-Resolved MR Digital Subtraction Angiography

Half-Pulse Excitation Pulse Design and the Artifact Evaluation

American College of Radiology MR Accreditation Program. Testing Instructions

Application Guide & Release Notes

MRI MRI REGISTRY REVIEW PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF IMAGE FORMATION ARTIFACTS SUPERCONDUCTIVE MAGNET ANAIBI MOLINA(R) (RT) (MR) (CT) T2 DEPHASING

Downloaded from by on 02/07/18 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

A. SPECIFIC AIMS: phase graph (EPG) algorithms to cover a wide range of MRI

Diffusion and Functional MRI of the Spinal Cord Methods and Clinical Applications

Philips Site Yearly Performance Evaluation Philips Intera 1.5T 2-Mar-08. Table of Contents

Lab 8 6.S02 Spring 2013 MRI Projection Imaging

12/21/2016. Siemens Medical Systems Research Agreement Philips Healthcare Research Agreement AAN and ASN Committees

IR/SR TrueFISP. Works-in-Progress package Version 1.2. For the SIEMENS Magnetom. Installation and User s Guide NUMARIS/4VA21B.

MRI Systems and Coil Technology

Passive Tracking Exploiting Local Signal Conservation: The White Marker Phenomenon

Evaluation of MWT Materials Accusorb MRI Shield. Dr. E. Kanal, Department of Radiology, UPMC. Wednesday, April 21, 2010

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Magn Reson Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 21.

Annual Ceiling Amount: $

Experience in implementing continuous arterial spin labeling on a commercial MR scanner

Noninvasive Blood Flow Mapping with Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) Paul Kyu Han and Sung-Hong Park

Supplementary Material

functional MRI: A primer

Publication for the Philips MRI Community

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CAROTID MRI COMPLETION FORM, CMR, Version B, 12/08/2005

Using Adiabatic Inversion Pulses for Long-T 2 Suppression in Ultra-short Echo Time (UTE) Imaging

High-Resolution Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) Imaging on Human Knee With AWSOS Sequence at 3.0 T

Methods. Experimental Stimuli: We selected 24 animals, 24 tools, and 24

Digital Imaging CT & MR

Photomultiplier Tube

Hadamard Slice Encoding for Reduced-FOV Diffusion- Weighted Imaging

Transcription:

Advanced MSK MRI Protocols at 3.0T Garry E. Gold, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Radiology Stanford University

Outline Why High Field for MSK? SNR and Relaxation Times Technical Issues Example protocols New applications

MSK MR Imaging Small structures (10-16 16 cm) High resolution (< 0.5 mm) Limited motion Excellent contrast required

Rapid Knee Protocol

SNR Comparison 1.5T 3.0T Axial PD: SNR Ratio = 1.77

SNR Comparison 1.5T 3.0T Sagittal PD: SNR Ratio = 1.81

Chemical Shift Artifact BW + 16 khz BW + 64 khz

Chemical Shift and Bandwidth Bad News Chemical shift doubles at 3.0T compared with 1.5T Doubling the bandwidth: loss of 2 SNR Good News Doubling the bandwidth corrects chemical shift Higher bandwidth: - more slices - shorter echo times - shorter echo spacing - less metal artifact

Vascular Artifacts Sagittal T2 FSE with Fat Sat With flow compensation and S/I sat bands Frequency S/I

RF Power Deposition T1 SE: 4 min T1 FSE: 2 min Less RF Power, faster

RF Power Considerations Bad News RF power increases at 3.0T - T 1 SE and FSE are high power sequences Body coil transmit (high power) for pelvis and spine may limit some applications Good News Most joints are small in volume - limits power deposition (T/R coils) Lowering flip angle of refocusing pulses in FSE can decrease RF power, at the cost of some SNR

Fat Suppression at 3.0T Bad News More difficult at 3.0T due to field inhomogeneity Good News Fat sat pulses are shorter at 3.0T (shift of 440 Hz) Shorter sat pulses: -more slices per TR -faster SPGR imaging

Brachial Plexus: IDEAL Fat-Sat FSE IDEAL FSE

Rapid Knee Protocol Use: Routine knee imaging Goal: Keep imaging time to a minimum while having acceptable quality Possible to scan a knee in 15 min with table turn around

Rapid Knee Protocol Axial PD FSE TR/TE = 5000/35 Fat saturation 4.0 / 1.0 mm 320x224, 1 nex 14 cm FOV 26 slices ETL = 8 32 khz BW ARC 1.8

Rapid Knee Protocol Coronal T1 FSE TR/TE = 1000/20 No Fat saturation 4/1 mm 384x224, 1 nex 16 cm FOV 18 slices ETL = 4 32 khz BW ARC 1.8

Rapid Knee Protocol Coronal T2 FSE TR/TE = 4000/54 Fat saturation 4/1 mm 320x224, 1 nex 16 cm FOV 22 slices ETL = 8 32 khz BW ARC 1.8

Rapid Knee Protocol Sagittal PD FSE TR/TE = 5000/35 No fat saturation 3.0/0.5 mm 384x224, 1 nex 14 cm FOV 30 slices ETL = 8 32 khz BW ARC - none

Rapid Knee Protocol Sagittal T2 FSE TR/TE = 6400/60 No fat saturation 3.0/0.5 mm 320x224, 1 nex 14 cm FOV 30 slices ETL = 10 32 khz BW Flow Comp, SI Sat

Scan Time Comparison Sequence 1.5T (nex) 3.0T (nex) Axial PD 3:10 (2) 1:25 (1) Cor T1 5:10 (2) 1:43 (1) Cor T2 3:10 (2) 2:24 (1) Sag PD 4:16 (2) 2:30 (1) Sag T2 4:48 (3) 2:40 (1) Total 20:34 10:42

3.0T: Resolution Advantage

High Resolution Knee Protocol Use: High quality knee imaging Goal: Keep imaging time to about 30-45 min while having outstanding quality Possible to scan a knee in 45 min with table turn around 8 channel knee coil

High Resolution Knee Protocol Axial PD FSE TR/TE = 5000/20 Fat saturation 2.5/0.5mm 416 x 320 2 averages 14 cm FOV 26 slices ETL = 8 32 khz BW

High Resolution Knee Protocol Coronal T1 FSE TR/TE = 1000/15 No Fat saturation 2.5/0.5 mm 416 x 320 2 averages 14 cm FOV 18 slices ETL = 3 41 khz BW

High Resolution Knee Protocol Coronal T2 FSE TR/TE = 5000/60 Fat saturation 2.5/0.5 mm 416 x 320 2 averages 14 cm FOV 22 slices ETL = 8 32 khz BW

High Resolution Knee Protocol Sagittal PD FSE TR/TE = 5000/15 No fat saturation 2.5/0.5 mm 512 x 320 1.5 averages 16 cm FOV 30 slices ETL = 8 41 khz BW

High Resolution Knee Protocol Sagittal T2 FSE TR/TE = 5000/54 Fat saturation 2.5/0.5 mm 384 x 320 1.5 averages 16 cm FOV 30 slices ETL = 8 32 khz BW Flow Comp, S Sat

High Resolution Knee Protocol Coronal 3D FSE TR/TE = 3000/35 Fat saturation 0.6 mm slices 288 x 288 1.5 averages 17 cm FOV 200 slices ETL = 60 62 khz BW Reformat at 2 mm slices

High Resolution Scan Time Comparison Sequence 1.5T (slice, mm) 3.0T (slice, mm) Axial PD 3:10 (4) 6:00 (2.5) Cor T1 5:10 (4) 3:30 (2.5) Cor T2 3:10 (4) 6:00 (2.5) Sag PD 4:16 (3) 5:00 (2.5) Sag T2 4:48 (3.5) 5:00 (2.5) Cor 3D FSE x 5:00 (0.6) Total 20:34 30:30

Ankle at 3.0T T1 FSE T2 FSE Fat Sat 512x320, BW 41 khz, ETL = 3 416x224, BW 31 khz, ETL = 8 2.5 mm thick slices, 8-channel ankle coil

Elbow at 3.0T T1 FSE T2 FSE Fat Sat 512x320, BW 41 khz, ETL = 3 416x224, BW 31 khz, ETL = 8 2.5 mm thick slices, 8-channel knee coil

Dedicated 3T Wrist Coil 2 mm slices, 200 micron in-plane resolution Use: MDCT Repetitive strain injuries

Cor T2 FS T2 Ideal 3T Adductor Strain

Shoulder at 3.0T 2 mm thick slices

ute Imaging: 3D Cones TE = 0.1 ms TE = 4.6 ms 3.0T ute Cones Log subtraction

Take-Home Points Use dedicated RF coils Increased T1: Decrease averages Increase TR Decrease slice thickness Keep BW > +/-32 khz on sequences without fat saturation Consider T1 FSE (short ETL) to reduce SAR