EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD

Similar documents
TESTFIELD TRENTO: GEOMETRIC EVALUATION OF VERY HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGERY

Geometric potential of Pleiades models with small base length

Topographic mapping from space K. Jacobsen*, G. Büyüksalih**

RADIOMETRIC AND GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PLEIADES IMAGES

LPIS Orthoimagery An assessment of the Bing imagery for LPIS purpose

DEM GENERATION WITH WORLDVIEW-2 IMAGES

CHARACTERISTICS OF VERY HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL SATELLITES FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING

School of Rural and Surveying Engineering National Technical University of Athens

Radiometric Comparison between GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 Panchromatic and Multispectral Imagery

WorldView-2. WorldView-2 Overview

An Introduction to Geomatics. Prepared by: Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq خاص بطلبة مساق مقدمة في علم. Associate Professor of Surveying IUG

High Resolution Sensor Test Comparison with SPOT, KFA1000, KVR1000, IRS-1C and DPA in Lower Saxony

INFORMATION CONTENT ANALYSIS FROM VERY HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL SPACE IMAGERY FOR UPDATING SPATIAL DATABASE

Airborne or Spaceborne Images for Topographic Mapping?

EXAMPLES OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS PRODUCED FROM SPACE AND ACHIEVED ACCURACY CARAVAN Workshop on Mapping from Space, Phnom Penh, June 2000

Summary of the VHR image acquisition Campaign 2014 and new sensors for 2015

Introduction to Remote Sensing Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing. Mads Olander Rasmussen

Phase One 190MP Aerial System

Section 2 Image quality, radiometric analysis, preprocessing

HIGH RESOLUTION COLOR IMAGERY FOR ORTHOMAPS AND REMOTE SENSING. Author: Peter Fricker Director Product Management Image Sensors

PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PLANET.COM

Comparing geometric and radiometric information from GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 multispectral imagery

DEMS BASED ON SPACE IMAGES VERSUS SRTM HEIGHT MODELS. Karsten Jacobsen. University of Hannover, Germany

LAST GENERATION UAV-BASED MULTI- SPECTRAL CAMERA FOR AGRICULTURAL DATA ACQUISITION

ROLE OF SATELLITE DATA APPLICATION IN CADASTRAL MAP AND DIGITIZATION OF LAND RECORDS DR.T. RAVISANKAR GROUP HEAD (LRUMG) RSAA/NRSC/ISRO /DOS HYDERABAD

Advanced Optical Satellite (ALOS-3) Overviews

Geometry of Aerial Photographs

Planet Labs Inc 2017 Page 2

The studies began when the Tiros satellites (1960) provided man s first synoptic view of the Earth s weather systems.

Leica ADS80 - Digital Airborne Imaging Solution NAIP, Salt Lake City 4 December 2008

News on Image Acquisition for Campaign 2008

9/13/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

KOMPSAT Constellation. November 2012 Satrec Initiative

CALIBRATION OF OPTICAL SATELLITE SENSORS

GEO 428: DEMs from GPS, Imagery, & Lidar Tuesday, September 11

Introduction to KOMPSAT

COMPARISON OF INFORMATION CONTENTS OF HIGH RESOLUTION SPACE IMAGES

High resolution satellite imagery a shared and collective data source

E m e r g e n c y M a n a g e m e n t S e r v i c e. C o p e r n i c u s A e r i a l c o m p o n e n t s t a t u s s t u d y

Geomatica OrthoEngine v10.2 Tutorial DEM Extraction of GeoEye-1 Data

Leica - 3 rd Generation Airborne Digital Sensors Features / Benefits for Remote Sensing & Environmental Applications

European Space Imaging

Remote Sensing Platforms

UltraCam and UltraMap Towards All in One Solution by Photogrammetry

How to get base geospatial data for SDI from high resolution satellite images

remote sensing? What are the remote sensing principles behind these Definition

SPOT6. Impact of Spot 6 and 7 in the Constitution and Update of Spatial Data Infrastructures over Africa

Tutorial 10 Information extraction from high resolution optical satellite sensors

9/12/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATION: PLANETSCOPE & RAPIDEYE

NON-PHOTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS: Multispectral Scanners Medium and coarse resolution sensor comparisons: Landsat, SPOT, AVHRR and MODIS

Fusion of Heterogeneous Multisensor Data

Application of GIS to Fast Track Planning and Monitoring of Development Agenda

CHARACTERISTICS OF REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY. Spatial Resolution

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF DIGITAL CAMERAS AND SPACE IMAGERY. Karsten JACOBSEN

Int n r t o r d o u d c u ti t on o n to t o Remote Sensing

Tutorial 10 Information extraction from high resolution optical satellite sensors

CALIBRATION OF IMAGING SATELLITE SENSORS

Lecture 6: Multispectral Earth Resource Satellites. The University at Albany Fall 2018 Geography and Planning

Time Trend Evaluations of Absolute Accuracies for PRISM and AVNIR-2

TechTime New Mapping Tools for Transportation Engineering

European Space Imaging. Your Partner for Very High-Resolution Satellite Imagery GEOGRAPHIC

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

LECTURE NOTES 2016 CONTENTS. Sensors and Platforms for Acquisition of Aerial and Satellite Image Data

Files Used in This Tutorial. Background. Calibrating Images Tutorial

DigitalGlobe High Resolution Satellite Imagery

9/12/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

Photogrammetry. Lecture 4 September 7, 2005

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC IIe

HARRIS GEOSPATIAL MARKETPLACE. HarrisGeospatial.com

Aerial photography: Principles. Frame capture sensors: Analog film and digital cameras

SPOT 5 / HRS: a key source for navigation database

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY SOVZOND JSC компания «Совзонд»

GMES DA COPERNICUS

News on Image Acquisition for the CwRS Campaign new sensors and changes

Pléiades. Access to data. Charlotte Gabriel-Robez. January Pléiades product manager

Title of presentation runs here on two lines / Arial Regular 30 pt

Sensor resolutions from space: the tension between temporal, spectral, spatial and swath. David Bruce UniSA and ISU

Geometry perfect Radiometry unknown?

MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA EVALUATION BASED ON THE LATEST PHASE ONE TECHNOLOGY

PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATION: PLANETSCOPE & RAPIDEYE

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II Aero Photo Europe Investigation

IMAGE DATA AND TEST FIELD

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

PEGASUS : a future tool for providing near real-time high resolution data for disaster management. Lewyckyj Nicolas

EnsoMOSAIC Aerial mapping tools

HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY FOR MAPPING AND LANDSCAPE MONITORING

The Most Suitable Sizes Of Ground Control Points (Gcps) For World View2

Flood modelling and management. Glasgow University. 8 September Paul Shaw - GeoVision

Introduction to WG5 on CwRS imagery use and alternatives and QE5 on claimed rate inside the RP Peter Viskum Jørgensen, FERV and Birger Faurholt

Phase One ixu-rs1000 Accuracy Assessment Report Yu. Raizman, PhaseOne.Industrial, Israel

Introduction of Satellite Remote Sensing

New Constellations, New Capabilities, and Future Opportunities

US Commercial Imaging Satellites

Govt. Engineering College Jhalawar Model Question Paper Subject- Remote Sensing & GIS

Joint SIG Workshop. Urban - 3D - Radar - Thermal Remote Sensing and Developing Countries. Ghent, September Book of Proceedings

Processing of stereo scanner: from stereo plotter to pixel factory

New remote sensing sensors and imaging products for the monitoring of urban dynamics

Baldwin and Mobile Counties, AL Orthoimagery Project Report. Submitted: March 23, 2016

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD D. Poli a, F. Remondino b, E. Angiuli c, G. Agugiaro b a Terra Messflug GmbH, Austria b 3D Optical Metrology Unit, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy c Joint Research Center, European Commission, Ispra (VA), Italy

Outline Motivation Pleiades sensor description Data description Radiometric analysis Geometric processing DSM quality assessment Conclusion 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 2

Motivation Evaluation of 3D information extraction from VHR spaceborne image sensors on Trento testfield Analysis started with WorldView-2 and GeoEye-1 stereopairs (Melbourne, 2012) Pleiades triplet available through evaluation program organized by ASTRIUM GEO Few publications on Pleiades 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 3

Trento testfield Area: ca. 15x15km Min height: 150m Max height: 2181m Trento Population: 115000 inh. Height: ca. 200m 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 4

Trento testfield Space- and airborne imagery overview Pleiades triplet WorldView-2 stereopair GeoEye-1 stereopair Quickbird, Quickbird single scenes Aerial images (white) UAV images SPOT 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 5

Trento testfield other data DSM/DTM derived from a LiDAR flight in 2006/7. Cell size 1m (2m on mountainous areas). Reference dataset for the geometric analyses. 230 digital orthophotos (2006 and 2009), GSD 50 cm. Aerial flight with RMK TOP15 analogic camera (2009) over the city of Trento. GSD 12 cm. 180 UAV images (2012), acquired by a Microdrones MD4-200 mounting a Pentax Optio A40 digital camera (overlap: 80% along track, 40% across track). GSD 3 cm 70 ground points (2011), acq. by GNSS 12 ground points (2012), acq. by total station 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 6

Pleiades mission Part of the French-Italian ORFEO system Military and civil use Pleiades system: Pleiades 1A (launched in December 2011) Pleiades 1B (launched in December 2012) Orbit: height 694km near-polar (98.2 ) sun-synchronous 180 satellite phase 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 7

Pleiades images HiRi CCD cameras (1 camera/satellite) GSD 0.7m PAN (nadir) GSD 2.8m MS (nadir) Revisit time: 1 day Acquisition modes (one pass): Target, Strip Mapping, Tri-stereo Corridor and Persistent Surveillance Stereo acquisition modes: Stereo Tri-stereo 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 8

Pleiades images 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 9

Pleiade images over Trento Image 1 Image 2 Image 3 Along-track ( ) 12.35-12.69 17.38 Across-track ( ) 1.83 3.00 1.78 GSD (m) 0.72x0.73 0.74x0.73 0.78x0.74 Size (columns) 41427 41149 40436 Size (rows) 36199 36348 34446 Acquisition time 10:22:15 10:23:01 10:22:06 Solar Azimuth ( ) 157.85 158.24 157.85 Solar Elevation ( ) 51.79 51.85 51.79 Cloud cover 0 0 0 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 10

Pleiade images over Trento Image 1 Image 2 Image 3 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 11

Radiometric analysis Image quality and suitability are strongly affected by sensor viewing angle, sun acquisition angle and atmospheric conditions. Although not possible to compensate the effects induced by each component, through radiometric and DN analysis we can evaluate and distinguish some problems. Even if data is available at 12-bit, the main information is distributed between 0 and 10 bit. 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 12

Noise estimation With the term noise, we refer to all the anomalies and non-homogeneity that can be found in the image Spilling effects not present in the images Non-homogeneity noise effects ( filth analysis of homogeneous areas) Image divided into 5 bins (0-255, 256-511, 512-1023, 1024-2047, 2048-4095) For each bin i, normalized standard deviation computed for samples j in 5x5 pixel window 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 13

Noise estimation Channel Image 0 255 256 511 512 1023 1024 2047 2048 4095 Pan 1 2.26 2.28 2.60 2.61 2.60 Pan 2 2.06 2.06 2.60 2.61 2.63 Pan 3 2.27 2.30 2.60 2.69 2.70 Red 1 2.07 2.26 2.52 N/A N/A Red 2 1.93 2.03 2.57 N/A N/A Red 3 2.10 2.33 2.04 N/A N/A Green 1 2.14 2.40 2.60 2.62 2.62 Green 2 1.97 2.18 2.16 2.79 2.8 Green 3 2.17 2.44 2.60 N/A N/A Blue 1 2.56 2.49 2.51 2.63 2.65 Blue 2 N/A 2.50 2.40 N/A N/A Blue 3 2.57 2.50 2.57 N/A N/A NIR 1 1.60 2.08 2.39 2.43 2.50 NIR 2 1.33 2.05 2.10 2.57 2.63 NIR 3 1.58 2.07 2.39 2.63 2.75 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 14

Geometric processing Data acquisition Pleaides triplet Ground points Image orientation RPC model (RPC provided in metadata file) RPC correction with affine model Sub-pixel accuracy in check points Image matching Least-square matching Measurement of few seed points DSM generation Triangulazion and rasterization No editing Output: three DSMs (1m grid) From triplet From two pairs (1-2 and 2-3) Orthorectification 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 15

OpticalSCAPE ENVI module, recently released Developed by sarmap SA (Switzerland) and 4DiXplorer AG (Switzerland) Functionalities of SAT-PP software for geometric processing, plus DEM fusion (i.e. optical/sar) Advantage of ENVI environment 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 16

DSM quality analysis Visual inspection Quantitative comparison of DSM from triplet with Lidar Comparison between triplet and stereo pairs Comparison with WV2 and GE1 DSMs 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 17

DSM quality analysis DSM successfully generated from triplet and stereo pairs 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD

DSM quality analysis DSM successfully generated from triplet and stereo pairs 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD

DSM quality analysis DSM successfully generated from triplet and stereo pairs 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD

Shape of the terrain in flat, hilly and mountain areas is correctly modelled, even in case of rapid height changes Urban areas: the road network, building blocks and large single buildings can be clearly recognised in the surface model, as well as the shape of large buildings Surface well modelled on homogeneous areas, like rural fields DSM quality analysis 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 21

Comparison with Lidar Quantitative analysis in 3 areas Computed height differences and statistics within areas (min, max, avg, median, stdev, RMSE) Trento center Historical city centre. Completely built up area, irregular building shapes, narrow streets, nearly no vegetation Trento railway station Large regular buildings, larger streets with some trees Trento Fersina Residential area. Regular geometries, courtyards and streets with trees. 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 22

Comparison with Lidar Trento center min: -42.39 mean: 1.38 max: 24.22 Median: 0.06 RMSE: 6.12 Lidar Pleiades DSM Height differences Lidar above the DSM Lidar below the DSM 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 23

Comparison with Lidar Trento station min: -33.10 mean: 1.05 max: 54.69 Median: 0.22 RMSE: 6.52 Lidar Pleiades DSM Height differences Lidar above the DSM Lidar below the DSM 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 24

Comparison with Lidar Trento Fersina Lidar Pleiades DSM Height differences Lidar above the DSM Lidar below the DSM min: -42.91 mean: 0.47 max: 24.22 Median: 0.25 RMSE: 6.73 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 25

Comparison with Lidar height profiles Profiles: Lidar, Pleiades 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 26

Comparison between triplet and pairs No significant differences in the statistics of the height differences with respect to the reference Lidar DSM Advantage of triplet: reduction of local blunders, mainly in presence of occlusions 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 27

Comparison with WV2 and GE1 Data and processing in (Agugiaro et al., 2012 - ISPRS Melbourne) WorldView-2 (WV2) stereopair: Acquisition on: 22 Aug 2010, 10:40 am (GMT) PAN + MS8 (R, G, B, NIR, coastal, yellow, red edge, and NIR-2), avg GSD 0.5 m (PAN), 2 m (MS) Processing level: Stereo 1B Provided with RPCs FS, in-track view. angle 15.9, RS, -14.0 Cloud cover <10% GeoEye-1 (GE1) stereopair: Acquisition on: 8 Sep 2011, 10:20 am (GMT) PAN + MS4 avg GSD 0.5 m (PAN), 2 m (MS) Processing level: GeoStereo Provided with RPCs RS, in-track view. angle 15, RS, -20 Cloud cover <4% 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 28

Comparison with WV2 and GE1 DSM quality analysis (1m size) Min Max mean RMSE Trento centre Pleiades -42.4 24.2 1.4 6.1 WV2-53.9 26.7 1.9 7.4 GE1-44.4 26.5 2.3 6.9 Trento train station Pleiades -33.1 54.7 1.0 6.5 WV2-39.0 58.4 0.7 7.4 GE1-28.1 53.5 1.7 7.1 Trento Fersina Pleiades -42.9 24.2 0.5 6.7 WV2-43.7 27.7 0.3 8.5 GE1-46.3 28.8 0.5 7.9 Mean GSD: WV2 0.51m, GE1 0.51m, Pleiades 0.75m 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 29

Conclusions Trento testfield is update with last VHR satellite images, mainly for 3D investigations. Pleiades triplet analyzed radiometrically and geometrically Good radiometric quality Triplet and stereo DSMs (no edited) show good quality, both visually and after quantitative comparison to Lidar Similar behavior of WV2 and GE1, despite lower GSD Problematic areas are occlusions, but triplet acquisition reduces local blunders 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 30

Conclusions Triplet geometry of current triplet not optical. Better results are expected with nadir scene + two off-nadir Courtesy: Astrium Future work: Radiometric comparison with WV2 and GE1 Comparison of Pleiades DSM with Elevation1 product 22/5/2013 EVALUATION OF PLEIADES-1A TRIPLET ON TRENTO TESTFIELD 31

Thank you for your attention Credits: ASTRIUM GEO-Information Services Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Italy 3M project (co-founded Marie-Curie Actions FP7 PCOFOUND GA-2008-226070, acronym Trentino Project )