Analysis of Different Topologies of Inverter in 0.18µm CMOS Technology and its Comparision

Similar documents
Module 4 : Propagation Delays in MOS Lecture 19 : Analyzing Delay for various Logic Circuits

ECE 334: Electronic Circuits Lecture 10: Digital CMOS Circuits

2-Bit Magnitude Comparator Design Using Different Logic Styles

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 7, July ISSN

CHAPTER 5 DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMPLEMENTARY PASS- TRANSISTOR WITH ASYNCHRONOUS ADIABATIC LOGIC CIRCUITS

ECE520 VLSI Design. Lecture 5: Basic CMOS Inverter. Payman Zarkesh-Ha

Combinational Logic Gates in CMOS

Lecture 4. The CMOS Inverter. DC Transfer Curve: Load line. DC Operation: Voltage Transfer Characteristic. Noise in Digital Integrated Circuits

LOW POWER CMOS CELL STRUCTURES BASED ON ADIABATIC SWITCHING

Power-Area trade-off for Different CMOS Design Technologies

EEC 118 Lecture #11: CMOS Design Guidelines Alternative Static Logic Families

Introduction to Electronic Devices

DIGITAL VLSI LAB ASSIGNMENT 1

Domino CMOS Implementation of Power Optimized and High Performance CLA adder

EEC 118 Lecture #12: Dynamic Logic

Lecture 16. Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) CMOS 1-1

UNIT-III GATE LEVEL DESIGN

Design and Analysis of Sram Cell for Reducing Leakage in Submicron Technologies Using Cadence Tool

[Vivekanand*, 4.(12): December, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

Digital Integrated CircuitDesign

BASIC PHYSICAL DESIGN AN OVERVIEW The VLSI design flow for any IC design is as follows

Design and Analysis of Energy Efficient MOS Digital Library Cell Based on Charge Recovery Logic

EE 330 Lecture 43. Digital Circuits. Other Logic Styles Dynamic Logic Circuits

EE 330 Lecture 43. Digital Circuits. Other Logic Styles Dynamic Logic Circuits

Topic 6. CMOS Static & Dynamic Logic Gates. Static CMOS Circuit. NMOS Transistors in Series/Parallel Connection

ECE 471/571 The CMOS Inverter Lecture-6. Gurjeet Singh

Chapter 6 DIFFERENT TYPES OF LOGIC GATES

1. Short answer questions. (30) a. What impact does increasing the length of a transistor have on power and delay? Why? (6)

Performance Analysis of High Speed Low Power Carry Look-Ahead Adder Using Different Logic Styles

CHAPTER 6 PHASE LOCKED LOOP ARCHITECTURE FOR ADC

DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF A CHARGE RE-CYCLE BASED NOVEL LPHS ADIABATIC LOGIC CIRCUITS FOR LOW POWER APPLICATIONS

Ultra Low Power VLSI Design: A Review

EE434 ASIC & Digital Systems

EE 330 Lecture 42. Other Logic Styles Digital Building Blocks

BICMOS Technology and Fabrication

ECE 471/571 Combinatorial Circuits Lecture-7. Gurjeet Singh

IJMIE Volume 2, Issue 3 ISSN:

A Low Power Array Multiplier Design using Modified Gate Diffusion Input (GDI)

2-BIT MAGNITUDE COMPARATOR DESIGN USING DIFFERENT LOGIC STYLES

Design and Analysis of High Gain Differential Amplifier Using Various Topologies

A Novel Technique to Reduce Write Delay of SRAM Architectures

EE241 - Spring 2002 Advanced Digital Integrated Circuits

A HIGH SPEED DYNAMIC RIPPLE CARRY ADDER

Novel Buffer Design for Low Power and Less Delay in 45nm and 90nm Technology

CMOS VLSI Design (A3425)

Study the Analysis of Low power and High speed CMOS Logic Circuits in 90nm Technology

ECE380 Digital Logic. Logic values as voltage levels

Digital Integrated Circuits Designing Combinational Logic Circuits. Fuyuzhuo

Design and Analysis of Low Power Level Shifter in IC Applications

Reading. Lecture 17: MOS transistors digital. Context. Digital techniques:

Comparative Analysis of Low Power Adiabatic Logic Circuits in DSM Technology

MOS TRANSISTOR THEORY

Design of Low Voltage and High Speed Double-Tail Dynamic Comparator for Low Power Applications

Microelectronics, BSc course

Design of High Performance Arithmetic and Logic Circuits in DSM Technology

EE 330 Lecture 44. Digital Circuits. Other Logic Styles Dynamic Logic Circuits

Dynamic Logic. Domino logic P-E logic NORA logic 2-phase logic Multiple O/P domino logic Cascode logic 11/28/2012 1

VLSI Logic Structures

Analysis of SRAM Bit Cell Topologies in Submicron CMOS Technology

IMPLEMENTATION OF ADIABATIC DYNAMIC LOGIC IN BIT FULL ADDER

ELEC 2210 EXPERIMENT 12 NMOS Logic

1P6M 0.18-µm Low Power CMOS Ring Oscillator for Radio Frequency Applications

Pramoda N V Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, MCE Hassan Karnataka India

Comparative Study of Different Low Power Design Techniques for Reduction of Leakage Power in CMOS VLSI Circuits

DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF A HIGH PERFORMANCE CMOS VOLTAGE DOUBLERS USING CHARGE REUSE TECHNIQUE

A Low Noise, Voltage Control Ring Oscillator Based on Pass Transistor Delay Cell

Implementation of Full Adder using Cmos Logic

Design of 32-bit ALU using Low Power Energy Efficient Full Adder Circuits

Digital Integrated Circuits Designing Combinational Logic Circuits. Fuyuzhuo

ENEE307 Lab 7 MOS Transistors 2: Small Signal Amplifiers and Digital Circuits

Design Analysis of 1-bit Comparator using 45nm Technology

High Performance and Low power VLSI CMOS Circuit Designs using ONOFIC Approach

A RF Low Power 0.18-µm based CMOS Differential Ring Oscillator

ISSN: [Kumar* et al., 6(5): May, 2017] Impact Factor: 4.116

Comparative Analysis of Adiabatic Logic Techniques

DESIGN OF RING OSCILLATOR USING CS-CMOS FOR MIXED SIGNAL SOCS

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Computer Science 46 (2015 )

Designing Information Devices and Systems II Fall 2017 Note 1

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ENHANCED CARRY-LOOK AHEAD ADDER USING DIFFERENT LOGIC STYLES

Characterization of 6T CMOS SRAM in 65nm and 120nm Technology using Low power Techniques

Chapter 3 DESIGN OF ADIABATIC CIRCUIT. 3.1 Introduction

A 12-bit Hybrid DAC with Swing Reduced Driver

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE OF A TWO INPUT NAND GATE USING SUBTHRESHOLD LEAKAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUES

VLSI Designed Low Power Based DPDT Switch

Chapter 6 Combinational CMOS Circuit and Logic Design. Jin-Fu Li Department of Electrical Engineering National Central University Jungli, Taiwan

Power Efficient and Noise Immune Domino Logic for Wide Fan in Gates

A REVIEW PAPER ON HIGH PERFORMANCE 1- BIT FULL ADDERS DESIGN AT 90NM TECHNOLOGY

CPE/EE 427, CPE 527 VLSI Design I: Homeworks 3 & 4

Design Of Level Shifter By Using Multi Supply Voltage

Keywords: VLSI; CMOS; Pass Transistor Logic (PTL); Gate Diffusion Input (GDI); Parellel In Parellel Out (PIPO); RAM. I.

Low Power &High Speed Domino XOR Cell

IMPLEMANTATION OF D FLIP FLOP BASED ON DIFFERENT XOR /XNOR GATE DESIGNS

High-Performance of Domino Logic Circuit for Wide Fan-In Gates Using Mentor Graphics Tools

Low Power Adiabatic Logic Design

PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF DFAL BASED DYNAMIC COMPARATOR

Design of Low Power Double Tail Comparator by Adding Switching Transistors

! Sequential Logic. ! Timing Hazards. ! Dynamic Logic. ! Add state elements (registers, latches) ! Compute. " From state elements

A NEW APPROACH TO DESIGN LOW POWER CMOS FLASH A/D CONVERTER

Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient and Charge Recovery Adiabatic Techniques for Low Power Design

Transcription:

Analysis of Different Topologies of Inverter in 0.18µm CMOS Technology and its Comparision Ashish Panchal (Senior Lecturer) Electronics & Instrumentation Engg. Department, Shri G.S.Institute of Technology and Science, Indore, India Mobile no.:-+919691243624 ashish_panchal@ymail.com Rajkumar Gehlot (Senior Lecturer) School of Electronics Department, Devi Ahillya Vishwa Vidyalaya, Indore, India Mobile no.:-+919893146830 rajkumar.gehlot85@gmail.com Nidhi Maheshwari (Senior Lecturer) Electronics & Instrumentation Engg. Department, Shri G.S.Institute of Technology and Science, Indore, India Mobile no.:-+919039969095 er.nidhi17@ymail.com Prafful Dubey (Lecturer) Electronics & Communication Engg. Department, Laxmi Narayan College of Technology and Science, Indore, India Mobile no.:-+919329516355 praffuldubey@gmail.com Abstract:-In this paper we study inverter topologies under various criteria and caracteristics using Cadence tool. This paper includes analysis of inveter topologies utilized in VLSI that includes CMOS, Pseudo NMOS and Dynamic families. The characteristics include DC transfer characteristics, current Vs voltage characteristics, area and delay. The inverter topologies has been designed in 0.18μm CMOS technology with 1.8V supply voltage. SPECTRA RF simulator is used for circuit simulation. This paper also revels an application specific utility of each topology in accordance to their performance. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8124

Introduction:- VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) is an upcoming technology that brought us in the world of miniaturization leading to various types of functionality to be incorporated on a single chipset. VLSI first developed in 1950s bringing drastic change in technology. It is the key enabling technology to function in micro and nano domain. Inveter is one of the most basic circuit implemented in VLSI. It finds number of application in amplification, logic inversion, as test circuit for advancements providing it with large acceptance in higher level circuits. The basic inverter circuit consist of a resistor and PDN (Pull Down Network) joined at their drain from where output is taken is shown in figure 1. The circuit have some disadvantages such as area consideration and static power dissipation so this circuit is replaced by Pull-up and Pull-down network. The Pull-up network (PUN) consist of PMOS and Pull-down network (PDN) consist of NMOS as shown in figure 2. The PDN will conduct for all input combination that require low output and will then pull the output node down to ground, the PUN will be OFF. On the other hand, all input combination that call for high output will Figure 1:-Resistive Load Inverter cause the PUN to conduct, and the PUN will then pull the output node up to Vdd, PDN will be OFF. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8125

Figure 2:-Pull-up and Pull-down Network This makes it important to have detailed study of inverter and its characteristics so as to bring avancement to VLSI technology.this paper provides inverter utility for applications involving low power design, driving capability, area constraints etc. In this paper we analyzed various topologies of inverter which includes: CMOS inverter, Pseudo NMOS inverter and Dynamic inverter. The remaining paper is organized as follows. In next section circuit description of inverter topologies is described, after that we introduces simulation results and conclusion. Circuit Description:- 1. CMOS Inverter:-This is basic topology used in VLSI. The CMOS inverter circuit consist of PMOS and NMOS. PMOS acts as pull-up network and NMOS acts as pull-down network. PMOS is connected to Vdd at its source while NMOS source is connected to ground is shown in figure 3. The input is applied on gate-source terminal and output is taken from drain-source terminal. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8126

Figure 3:-Schematic of CMOS Inverter It provide full output voltage swing between 0V to Vdd and the steady-state power dissipation of CMOS inverter is negligible. 2. Pseudo NMOS Inverter:- The large area requirement of CMOS gates presents a problem in high density design. In order to overcome this problem Pseudo inverter is proposed. Pseudo NMOS inverter is the topology that utilizes a constant load i.e., a PMOS transistor that is permanently grounded through its gate terminal is shown in figure 4. PMOS transistor precharges output to high logic so as to reduce delay for high output. Pseudo inverter is also known as ratioed inverter. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8127

Figure 4:-Schematic of Pseudo Inverter This circuit has more power dissipation and current with reduction in delay for high logic. 3. Dynamic Inverter:-Dynamic inverter is an improvement to Pseudo NMOS. In this circuit clock is applied to PMOS and input voltage is applied to NMOS as shown in figure 5. Dynamic circuit operate in two modes: Precharge mode and Evaluation mode. During Precharge mode, clock signal is low. The PMOS transistor is conducting while NMOS transistor is OFF. So, the output capacitance is charged to Vdd. The input voltages are also applied during this mode. During Evaluation mode, clock signal is high. The NMOS transistor is conducting while PMOS transistor is OFF. So, the output capacitance is discharged through ground depending upon the applied inputs. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8128

Figure 5:-Schematic of Dynamic Inverter Its static power dissipation is less than that of Pseudo NMOS inverter but greater than CMOS inverter. It is more complex, and less robust design. Results:- 1) DC Transfer Characteristics:-This is the characteristic drawn for Vout Vs Vin for an inverter. Here we find the variation in output voltage (Vout) depending upon the input voltage (Vin). This can be done graphically, analytically or through simulation. In this paper we used simulation mechanism using Cadence tool. The graphical characterization for various topologies is given below. a) CMOS Inverter:-The graph gives characteristics for output voltage Vs input voltage shown in figure 6. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8129

Figure 6:-DC Transfer Characteristic of CMOS Inverter Table 1:-CMOS Inverter S.No. Vin Vout 1 0 to 0.79V High(1) 2 0.79 to 0.854V Not defined 3 0.854 to 1.8V Low(0) b) Pseudo NMOS Inverter:-The DC transfer characteristic for Pseudo inverter is shown in figure 7. The graph revels that the inverter has high noise and its characteristics is highly deviated from ideal characteristics. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8130

Figure7:-DC Transfer Characteristics of Pseudo NMOS Inverter Table 2:-Pseudo NMOS Inverter S.No. Vin Vout 1 0 to 1.1V High(1) 2 1.1 to 1.6V Not defined 3 1.6 to 1.8V Low(0) c) Dynamic Inverter:- The DC transfer characteristic for Dynamic inverter is shown in figure 8. Its characteristics is better than that of Pseudo inverter. The deviation is reduced by reducing the width of PMOS. Table 3:-Dynamic Inverter S.No. Vin Vout 1 0 to 0.9V High(1) 2 0.9 to 1.6V Not defined 3 1.6 to 1.8V Low(0) ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8131

Figure 8:-DC Transfer Characteristic of Dynamic Inverter 2) Voltage Transfer Characteristics:-This characteristic is drawn between input voltage and output current. Here we analyze the changes in output current corresponding to variation in input voltage. a) CMOS Inverter:-The I-V characteristic of CMOS inverter is shown in figure 9. This graph suitable for low power application and reduces driving capability because of the presence of peak for very little instant time. So its not suitable for switching application. b) Pseudo NMOS Inverter:-The I-V characteristic of Pseudo NMOS inverter is shown in figure 10. This characteristic defines that current is found constant at peak value for input voltage 3Vdd/5 and its power dissipation high, at the same time its driving capability increases. c) Dymamic inverter:-the I-V characteristic of Dynamic inverter is shown in figure 11. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8132

Figure 9:-I-V Characteristic of CMOS Inverter Figure 10:-I-V Characteristic of Pseudo NMOS Inverter ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8133

Figure 11:-I-V Characteristic of Dynamic Inverter 3) Area and Delay Effects:-VLSI targets large circuits on minimum possible area, it targets the circuit area to be as low as possible reliable to have more compact and user friendly. It also targets on the output to be as fast as possible. a) CMOS Inverter:-The CMOS inverter occupy more area because the width of PMOS transistor is larger than thatof NMOS transistor. As the number of inputs increases, the number of transistors also increases two times (2N). But its delay time is much lesser than that of others as shown in figure 12. b) Pseudo NMOS Inverter:-The Pseudo NMOS inverter occupy less area as compare to CMOS inverter because when the number of inputs increases, number of transistors increases by N+1 times. But the delay time of this inverter is large which is shown in figure 13. c) Dynamic inverter:- The Dynamic inverter occupy less area as compare to CMOS inverter but greater than that of Pseudo inverter because the number of inputs increases so the number of transistors also increases by N+2 times. But its delay time is less which is shown in figure 14. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8134

Figure 12:-Delay Characteristic of CMOS Inverter Figure 13:-Delay Characteristic of Pseudo Inverter ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8135

Figure 14:-Delay Characteristic of Dynamic Inverter Table 4:-Comparision of Inverter Topologies S.No. CHARACTERISTICS CMOS INVERTER PSEUDO INVERTER DYNAMIC INVERTER 1 No. of transistors 2 2 2 2 Delay (theoretical) 3RC 3RC 3RC 3 Delay (practically) 17ns 22ns 25ns 4 Area More Less as compare to CMOS inverter Less than CMOS and greater than Pseudo inverter 5 IV-Characteristics Slop is steep Slop is gradual Slop is gradual 6 DC-Characteristics Transition occur at Vdd/2 Transition occur at 7Vdd/10 Transition occur at 7Vdd/10 7 Effect of noise least More than CMOS More than CMOS 8 Use of clock No No Yes CONCLUSION:-The DC transfer characteristics of CMOS inverter are more reliable and performs better for low power design and finds applications in watches, calculator etc. It is ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8136

analyzed that Pseudo and Dynamic inverter acts same except for low current and low power dissipation for dynamic family due to presence of clock. Pseudo inverter having good driving capability but at the same time it consumes more power as compare to dynamic inverter due to high current. REFERENCES:- [1] VLSI Technology by S.M.SZE. [2] CMOS VLSI Design by Neil H.E. Weste. [3] CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis and Design by Sung-Mo Kang and Yusuf Leblebici. [4] Microelectronic Circuits by Sedra A, Smith K. [5] Introduction to Inverter-Wikipedia. ISSN : 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No. 11 November 2011 8137