Boston University School of Law Transactional LawMeet -Information Session - September 15, 2015

Similar documents
New York Bar admission (or eligibility to obtain admission promptly) is required.

PATENTESQUE LAW GROUP, LLP

Enayat Qasimi. Partner. Experience M Street, NW Suite 450N Washington, DC Phone: Fax:

Merriann M. Panarella, Esq. Panarella Dispute Resolution Services P.O. Box Wellesley, MA

Robert A. Greising Partner

207: Beyond the Playbook: Assessing and Implementing Tools and Processes to Efficiently Provide Information When You and Your Clients Need It

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Patent Monetization: 2010 and Beyond. Kevin S. Fiur Vice President ICAP Ocean Tomo December 2009

Addenco ENERGY & COMMODITIES LAW FIRM. AddVANTE. ABOUT ADDENCO Who we are What we do Our clients Our group OUR SERVICES

HON. FRANK J. BAILEY

Experienced. Focused. Reliable.

1004: Corporate Communications and Attorney-Client Privilege: What You Need to Know

LLM COVER LETTER SAMPLES

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

Pharma - Biotech Collaborations: Optimizing Success, Minimizing Risk and Maintaining Alignment

FACULTY PARTICIPANTS FACULTY BIOGRAPHIES STUDY MATERIALS

ALI-ABA Topical Courses The Rising Tide of Shareholder Activism December 3, 2009 Topical Audio Webcast TABLE OF CONTENTS

Shell Trading Gas and Power Company General Manager Regulatory Affairs, December 2, 2002 to Present

Stephen D. Dellinger. Focus Areas. Overview

Intellectual property governance and strategic value creation:

Robert A. Greising Partner

VOLUME ONE PROGRAM SCHEDULE FACULTY BIOS

VOXPRO A Case Study Prepared by AM O Sullivan PR Ltd.

Blakely Advocacy Institute

Small Business Investment Companies

Kevin S. Mullen. Focus Areas. Overview

Change the Game, SMEs! Leverage on your IP

DRAFT AGENDA. OECD/Korean Policy Centre. Workshop on Merger Review Procedures and Joint Ventures. MOFCOM - Beijing, 25 June 2014

Bennett Jones. John N. Craig Q.C. Partner, Co-Head of Construction. Your lawyer. Your law firm. Your business advisor.

Teresa V. Pahl Partner

Modern Corporate Legal and Business Ethics: Backdating, Pretexting and Other Lapses

SHOW ME THE MONEY: THE ESSENTIALS OF VALUATION OF COPYRIGHTS IN TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATION

Sheryl L. Toby Member

Governing Council. Inventions Policy. October 30, 2013

arbitration commercial disputes corporate Get The Right Lawyer For The Right Advice From Prominent Indonesian Law Firm

Affiliate Proposal. Corporate and Securities Law Institute. Chicago, IL April 26-27,

David I. Greenbaum Partner

COACH AIRFARE AND (1) NIGHT LODGING PAID BY USLAW NETWORK USLAW NETWORK JUNE 13-14, 2016 RITZ CARLTON SAN FRANCISCO SAN FRANCISCO, CA

Fenwick & West LLP Gordon K. Davidson Managing Partner What traits or attributes do you look for in an effective lawyer?

WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

104 Negotiation for Success: Effective Advocacy in ADR

Mergers and Acquisitions/ Private Equity. Providing In-Depth Deal Coverage for Buyers, Sellers, and Investors. Attorney Advertising

Mark A. Berman, Esq.

Helping Businesses & Investors. Succeed Across Saudi Arabia

Does your company know about IP rights and use them effectively to achieve business growth and protection?

Ned Abelson. Director. Accolades. Boston:

Michael B. Abbott. Partner

MR. SCOTT A. BARNES, CPA, CFF, CGMA

Interactive Retainer Letter

Management Oversight and Control: How to Ensure Compliance and Limit Liability

Los Angeles Office. Skadden.

Anthony D. Rizzotti. Focus Areas. Overview

Paul E. Burns, Partner

Strategic Patent Management: An Introduction

Anna Haapanen. Profile

Overview. How is technology transferred? What is technology transfer? What is Missouri S&T technology transfer?

Kenneth L. Bachman, Jr.

Antitrust & Competition

Patrick W Shea. New York. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education. Partner, Employment Law Department

Founder Follies. Presentation for Harvard Business School. February 9, Jeffrey L. Quillen Alexander J. Aber

Brad Hamilton. Brad Hamilton. President. President. Summary

Represented a Russian State oil company on its acquisition of an interest in Russian upstream acreage and the related joint venture.

Joseph M. Wientge Jr. Focus Areas. Overview

Affiliate Proposal. Corporate and Securities Law Institute. Chicago, IL April 11-12,

South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy

Trademarks. Fortune 500 companies and organizations of all sizes trust Lathrop Gage to help establish, guard, maintain and enforce trademarks.

Bios. James R. Kruse. Richard Best

Purvi B. Maniar Member of the Firm

MICO 606: Post-Merger Integration Process for the Energy Industry Spring 2016

T R A D I N G M AT T E R S

A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Stern School of Business

Areas of Practice GENERAL NICHE

Jones Day MCLE University

ADORIA LIM Principal

What To Do When Project Impacts Are In Dispute? Participatory Monitoring and Joint Fact-finding

2010/IPEG/SYM/003 Measures for Encouraging Patent Licensing - INPIT Challenges

507: A Leader s Guide to Delegating Legal Work: Stratifying Legal Services and Expanding the Role of Non-Lawyers in Your Department

Emerging FinTech Trends (FinTech Track) Tuesday, May 22 10:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m.

1,700. Workplace Harassment:

Preparing For and Surviving an M&A Transaction

Faculty. Executive LLM Program

Latin America. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP pillsburylaw.com

MANAGEMENT BOARD REPORT AND EXPLANATORY STATEMENTS ON THE RESOLUTIONS SUBMITTED TO THE COMBINED GENERAL MEETING OF 18 NOVEMBER 2015

Batya F. Forsyth Partner

New & Small Business Ventures MGT 244 Spring Qt COURSE SYLLABUS

Appointment of External Auditors

NORTHERN IRELAND TRANSPORT HOLDING COMPANY

Ima Student 315 S. Plymouth Court, Apt. 222 Chicago, IL (312)

François G. Laugier's Representative Experience

The University of Arizona 1201 E Speedway Boulevard Tucson, AZ (mobile)

Elizabeth J. Hampton Partner

402: The Successful Joint Venture: From Courtship to Conclusion and Beyond

106: Third-party Risk: Creating an Effective Information Security and Data Privacy Assessment Program for Third-party Vendors

Masterclass on GDPR Compliance

Mediation Choices for Effective Representation and Advocacy Monday, October 29, :00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. New York State Bar Association Program Agenda

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2015 Primerus Legal Risk Management Seminar: A Comparative Analysis by World Region. Intellectual Property Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Market

GETTING STARTED. Deciding What Tasks To Delegate To Your 123Employee Agent

Gregory H. Chertoff, Esq. Peckar & Abramson, P.C. 41 Madison Avenue 20th Floor New York, NY

Transcription:

Boston University School of Law Transactional LawMeet -Information Session - September 15, 2015

Transactional Law Program Transactional Law Program spearheads BU Law s participation in Transactional LawMeet Transactional LawMeet experience enhances development of Transactional Practice Core Competencies which is central objective of the Transactional Law Program

Why Participate in a Transactional LawMeet? Develop and Hone Transactional Practice Core Competencies: Contract Literacy Understanding and drafting, and identifying business issues in, contracts Transactional Literacy Understanding and achieving client business objectives and creative problem solving Getting the Deal Done Deal dynamics and responsibilities of deal attorneys Opportunity for recognition in national competition

Develop and Hone Transactional Practice Core Competencies Interact with clients to identify key business goals Prepare draft agreement provisions reflecting business goals Analyze and comment on opposing counsel drafts Meet deadlines for drafts and responses Live negotiations to resolve issues

Opportunity for Recognition in Increasingly Competitive Transactional Law Marketplace Transactional LawMeet gives transactional practice-focused students chance to excel and receive recognition Increasing attendance by top tier law schools enhances visibility and prestige of the competition

Seven Regional Meets Transactional LawMeet Overview New England Regional Meet February 26, 2016 at Western New England University School of Law BU Law to send one team (2 or 3 students) Top team from each side of the negotiation at each Regional Meet invited to compete at National LawMeet April 8, 2016 at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York

Three phases Transactional LawMeet Regional Competition Phase I: Drafting Based on case facts, video recording of an interview with the client, a client conference call, and a precedent agreement, each team prepares and submits a proposed draft agreement Phase II: Markup Each team prepares and submits a mark-up of one draft agreement submitted by one of the teams they will negotiate with at the Regional Meet. Phase III: Negotiation Each team participates in two negotiation sessions, one with team whose draft agreement they marked up and the other with team who marked up their draft agreement Judges select two teams (one from each side) for National Meet

Three phases Phase I: Drafting Teams submit original or revised draft agreement Phase II: Markup Each team prepares a mark-up of one opposing team s draft agreement. Phase III: Negotiation Transactional LawMeet National Competition Preliminary round: Each team participates in two negotiation sessions, one with team whose draft agreement they marked up and the other with team who marked up their draft agreement 4 teams from preliminary round selected to compete in one final round Winning team awarded National Championship title

BUSL Transactional LawMeet Purpose Provide students with transactional moot court experience Select team to represent BUSL in the Regional Meet Prepare team for the Regional and National Meets Format similar to Regional/National Meets Michael Frankel, Lecturer in Law, will provide guidance and advice for the BUSL competition, and through Regional and National Meets

Michael Frankel, J.D., M.B.A. Boston Managing University Slideshow Director, Title Goes Deloitte Here New-venture Accelerator Former M&A attorney in the New York office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Served as head of corporate development at several global corporations Negotiated and executed over 100 mergers & acquisitions, and other strategic transactions Author of three books on mergers & acquisitions and other strategic transactions Email: mesfrankel@gmail.com

BUSL Transactional LawMeet Overview of Process Teams receive case materials including: Case Statement describing the deal, the parties and the issue(s) Draft Stock Purchase Agreement that the parties have finalized but not yet signed Technology License Agreement between the target company and a third party Transcript of a brief client interview outlining client s initial position on the issue(s) Model precedent Indemnification Agreement

BUSL Transactional LawMeet Overview of Process Buyer and Seller Teams will meet separately with Michael Frankel for Q&A Teams meet (in person or via conference call or Skype) with clients (senior professional dealmakers) who answer questions and provide business context Teams draft an indemnification agreement to address the issues related to the royalty dispute (Seller teams going first starting with model precedent and Buyer teams responding) Michael Frankel will be available by phone/skype (by appointment and office hours) to answer questions and advise on the process.

BUSL Transactional LawMeet Overview of Process Teams meet for a live negotiation before a panel of judges Teams judged on: Quality of drafting Negotiation skills Performance in other aspects of the process, e.g.., preparation, client interviewing, meeting deadlines, etc. BUSL team (2 or 3 students) selected for Regional Meet

BUSL Transactional LawMeet Preliminary Calendar (see blogs.bu.edu/transactionallawmeet/) September 15-25 Student/teams sign-up (Prof. Coit s office, Tower Room 1506E) September 25 Participants/teams finalized Week of September 28 Case materials distributed October 5 Team meetings Q&A with Michael Frankel (Redstone Room 419) October 15 Client meetings for Buyer Teams (Redstone Room 419) October 16- Client meetings for Seller Teams (Redstone Room 416) October 30 Seller teams deliver initial drafts to Buyer teams November 11 Buyer teams deliver proposed revisions to Seller teams November 20 Negotiation sessions before judges; BUSL team selected for Regional Meet (Redstone Room 416)

Regional & National Transactional LawMeets Calendar Boston December University Slideshow 11, 2015 Title Goes Case Here Statement Published January 29, 2016 First Client Conference Call February 5, 2016 Drafts Due February 12, 2016 Second Client Conference Call February 19, 2016 Markups Due February 26, 2016 Regional LawMeets; teams chosen to participate in National Meet March 4, 2016 First Client Conference Call March 11, 2016 Revised Drafts Due March 18, 2016 Second Client Conference Call March 25, 2016 Markups Due April 8, 2016 National LawMeet