Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities. Preservation for reuse of high quality data

Similar documents
Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities. First Call for proposals. Nikos Kastrinos. Unit L1 Coordination and Horizontal Aspects

Il programma di lavoro SSH 2013

WhyisForesight Important for Europe?

Research on Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities FP7

Eva Carnestedt och Birgitta Boman

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Data users and data producers interaction: the Web-COSI project experience

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

Introducing the 7 th Community Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development ( ) 2013)

Social Sciences and Humanities in the Framework Programmes

SCAR response to the 2 nd Foresight Expert Group Report

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

FP7 Cooperation Programme - Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Tentative Work Programme 2011

The Social Sciences in Horizon 2020: Societal Challenge 6 - Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies

Horizon 2020 and CAP towards 2020

Building the ERA of Knowledge for Growth. Proposals for the 7 th Research Framework Programme

COST FP9 Position Paper

From FP7 towards Horizon 2020 Workshop on " Research performance measurement and the impact of innovation in Europe" IPERF, Luxembourg, 31/10/2013

COST European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

ConstantinaMakri. Research Promotion Foundation

3. How to prepare a successful proposal?

The main FP7 instruments. Aurélien Saffroy. 6 Dec

FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES

Smart City Indicators

EU initiatives supporting universities

EC-Egypt Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement. Road Map

Belgian Position Paper

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Developing Smart Specialisation through Targeted Support

Foresight and Scenario Development

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

Strategy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NATIONAL DOCUMENTATION CENTRE NHRF

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Horizon 2020 from the SSH Perspective

Customising Foresight

Using foresight techniques in the implementation of innovation policies

Opportunities for Science & Technology Cooperation between the European Union and Russia

COST Open Call and COST New Action Proposal Submission, Evaluation, Selection and Approval Procedure

Open access in the ERA and Horizon 2020 Daniel Spichtinger DG Research & Innovation, European Commission

The European Union Research Framework Programme opportunities for cooperation with third countries

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

Access to Research Infrastructures under Horizon 2020 and beyond

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

Position Paper of Iberian universities. The mid-term review of Horizon 2020 and the design of FP9

Introduction to HSE ISSEK

Europe as a Global Actor. International Dimension of Horizon 2020 and Research Opportunities with Third Countries

Expectations around Impact in Horizon 2020

How to identify and prioritise research issues?

Forsight and forward looking activities Exploring new European Perspectives Vienna 14-15th June 2010

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

SEAS-ERA STRATEGIC FORUM

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Smart Specialisation and the Budapest Manifesto

Embedding Social Science and Humanities (SSH) across Horizon Ben Sharman, UK National Contact Point

Horizon 2020 opportunities for research and innovation

Stakeholders Conference. Conclusions. EU-EECA S&T cooperation: The way forward. Athens June 2009

POSITION OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ITALY (CNR) ON HORIZON 2020

Reaction of the European Alliance for Culture and the Arts to the European Commission s proposal for the EU future budget

TOWARDS A VISION ON GLOBAL RAW MATERIALS COOPERATION

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

Plenary Assembly European Construction Technology Platform (ECTP( Building the Europe of Knowledge ECTP) Special features. Specific Programmes

Engaging Stakeholders

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in European research. Harnessing vibrant communities

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

Hamburg, 25 March nd International Science 2.0 Conference Keynote. (does not represent an official point of view of the EC)

Universities and Sustainable Development Towards the Global Goals

The EU / LAC Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation (JIRI) Libardo Gutierrez Colciencias

European R&D and innovation policy: state of the art and perspectives

Experiences from the Social Sciences - possible links to Health Data?

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Annual Report 2010 COS T SME. over v i e w

Research and innovation strategies for smart specialization

EC proposal for the next MFF/smart specialisation

Raw materials topics in Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 5 Work Programme 2016

VSNU December Broadening EU s horizons. Position paper FP9

EU Research Integrity Initiative

Scientific information in the digital age: European Commission initiatives

Access to scientific information in the digital age: European Commission initiatives

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

No. prev. doc.: 9108/10 RECH 148 SOC 296 Subject: Social Dimension of the European Research Area - Adoption of Council conclusions

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Socio-economic Sciences & Humanities Opportunities in Horizon 2020 Conference Achieving Impact, Athens,

Digital Content Preliminary SWOT Analysis

Opportunità per i ricercatori SSH in Horizon Monique Longo

New societal challenges for the European Union New challenges for social sciences and the humanities

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

European Circular Economy Stakeholder Conference Brussels, February 2018 Civil Society Perspectives

Exploring emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European cities

SME support under Horizon 2020 Diana GROZAV Horizon 2020 SME NCP Center of International Projects

RENEW-ESSENCE Position Paper on FP9 September Michele Guerrini, Luca Moretti, Pier Francesco Moretti, Angelo Volpi

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

Document on the. Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation

Transcription:

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities Preservation for reuse of high quality data

Research funding in Socio Economic Sciences and Humanities Research in the socio-economic sciences is needed in Europe to support evidence based policy making The Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities theme of the European Commission s 7th Framework Programme for Research (FP7) funds such research

Research funding in Socio Economic Sciences and Humanities Results of funding should be: Research projects Research findings and results Networks of researchers More and better researchers Infrastructures All of which are useful outputs

Research funding in Socio Economic Sciences and Humanities its foundations (European) research in socioeconomics is dependent on the availability of an adequate qualitative and quantitative information base

Tangible and intangible results Research Projects should and do produce: Tangible outputs (results, findings, policy recommendations, infrastructures, focus, ) Less tangible outputs (lasting networks, SSH researchers, )

Research funding in Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities its outputs Research results and findings (outputs, deliverables) Publications (peer reviewed and other), Meetings and conferences, Websites, training, policy recommendations, published databases, survey results, tools and methods, statistics and indicators, classifications, typologies, methodologies,

Networks of researchers Research funding in Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities its outputs Existing before projects and submitting projects Created to execute projects (not just NoEs) Long lasting (resulting both directly and indirectly from projects)

Research funding in Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities its outputs Better and more SSH researchers Ph.D.s Post doc expreience International exchanges Training within projects

Research funding in Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities its outputs Infrastructures Some projects are explicitly set up, support and to produce infrastructures (CESSDA, ESS, SHARE, Others produce and use own infrastructures

Research funding in Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities its outputs Main users of SSH research Policy makers and those working in policy support Researchers

Problems and inefficiencies as seen by funders of SSH research 1. Inadequate uptake by policy makers or researchers, of the visible outputs of research projects. This limits, towards zero in some cases, the actual impact of the research we, all, support 2. Lots of own infrastructures produced and used by projects and which are not formal deliverables could potentially, and usefully, be reused and developed further but they can not be because they are: not made available (for various different reasons) of inadequate quality, radically incomplete built in non standard and non comparable ways, designed with no thought for future reuse and development, 3+. There are of course other problems: difficulties assessing quality and appropriateness of research projects, poor science, duplication, IPR, constraints on access to individual data,

The European Commission is a big funder of social economic science research We are starting to address the 1st problem, urgently need to address the 2 nd problem and also want to address problems 3+ (CESSDA addresses some of 3+ problems as well as 2) For problem 1 under FP7 we have formalised the need for complete dissemination and for ex ante impact assessment in the projects we fund This translates into greatly increased emphasis on dissemination and to a lesser extent by (ex ante) impact assessment in our programmes and projects Problem 2 is the one that interests most of us here today Many of the projects we fund produce, collect and use internally for their projectpotentially interesting surveys, classifications, databases, statistics and indicators, analytical and other methods, models, tools, but many of these resources are then wasted

Why are we interested in CESSDA? CEESDA can help resolve the second problem and some of the others, or at least can in certain cases and certain ways, and can thereby improve the long term usefulness of many of the projects we fund CESSDA particularly can help when own infrastructure resulting from projects is of potential value to other researchers (or policy makers) CESSDA can provide ways of keeping the information in the medium to long term in such a way that it can be reused and built upon CESSDA can not resolve all our problems and in some cases its approach may be neither appropriate nor necessary

Some cases where CESSDA is not the appropriate route to take Statistical series likely to be taken up by National Statistical Offices, Eurostat, OECD, etc (CESSDA intends to provide links to such datasets) Surveys, etc. already supported by infrastructural support programmes (CESSDA intends to provide links to such information) Where there are other more appropriate existing (sectoral) mechanisms (CESSDA intends to provide provide links to such information)

Other problems we often face Very good projects that have no follow-up or mechanism allowing for relevant further development of the research on an appropriate timescale (snapshots, break up of teams, years missing in the datasets, ) How to support infrastructure in the transition periods from research projects to operational uptake and regular use of information Here CESSDA could help in some cases minimising losses as many of these projects have useful own infrastructure

Wider approach needed than just data archives Having data archives available only solves part of the problems Mechanisms have to be put in place to ensure that information is produced in such a way by research projects that it can and should go into data archives if appropriate An overall approach to data structures, use of standards, etc. is needed Mechanisms need to include: Information in calls Eevaluation criteria taking account of archiving needs Screening for reusability service Archive deliverables Penalties for not conforming to archiving requirements

Some advantages of CESSDA Quality control Controlled access for confidential information Structures, standards, Facility of access for all types of users One stop shopping Catalogues relevant for all users needs

FP7 SSH research What FP7 funding can directly help CESSDA? The infrastructures programme But also some elements of the SSH theme

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.6: Socio-economic and scientific indicators Area 8.6.2: Developing better indicators for policy Topic: SSH-2009 6.2.1 Indicators for the European service sector Indicators research relating to: measurement, productivity, growth in the service sector; including ICT services, ICT intensive services, financial services, wholesale and retail trades, health, social and personal services Area 8.6.3: Provision of underlying official statistics Topic: SSH-2009 6.3.1 Data management for statistics Research into: the combination of electronic surveys, new sampling techniques, cross linking data, EU level representativity, reduction of response burden and survey costs, methods for handing large datasets.

Dr Ian Perry European Commission DG RTD-L-2 Research in the Economic, Social Sciences and Humanities Prospective Postal address: SDME 7/36, BE-1049 Brussels Office location: 8 square de Meeûs, BE-1050 Brussels Tel: +32 2 296 2079, Fax: +32 2 296 2137 Sec: +32 2 298 4130 e-mail: ian.perry@ec.europa.eu

The FP7 SSH call

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities in FP 7 Structure Addressing major challenges facing EU and the World : growth, employment, competitiveness, knowledge society. combining economic, social and environmental objectives: energy, agriculture, rural and urban issues. major trends in Society: demography, quality of life, cultural interactions. global interactions and interdependence; conflicts and peace. participation, democracy, governance; European diversities and commonalities.

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities in FP 7 Structure Addressing cross cutting activities: socio-economic and scientific indicators Foresight activities (key challenges for the community and research systems and policies) communication and exploitation of results

Contains 3 calls for proposals SSH-2009-A SSH-2009-B SSH-2009-C 2009 Work Programme Overview Call publication: 3rd September 2008 Call Closure: 13th January 2009

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in FP7 ERC - Ideas Programme: Six SSH Panels Capacities Programme: Infrastructures Science in Society Cooperation Programme: Theme 8: SSH SSH in other Themes

2009 Work Programme Funding schemes Collaborative projects (Call A) Research for the benefit of Specific Groups Civil Society Organisations (Call A) Collaborative projects for Specific International Cooperation Actions SICA (Call B) Coordination and Support Actions (Call C)

Main aspects Work Programme 2009 is a logic complement of the first Call 2007 2008: consistent with the Specific Programme, corresponding to urgent scientific and future policy needs. All the Activities are covered; the challenges are multidisciplinary and they request integration of all the disciplines in a balanced way (economic, social, cultural, political); quantitative and qualitative approaches are requested. Emphasis on: the international / global dimension, humanities, methods of analysis and assessment, foresight.

Main aspects Support to EU Policies: ERA, Lisbon, Sustainable Development, Renewed Social Agenda, Cohesion, Security, Cultural Interactions, European Citizenship International cooperation is strengthened. Communication is subject of intensive efforts.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.1 : Growth, employment and competitiveness in a knowledge society the European case Area 8.1.1 : Changing role of knowledge throughout the economy Topic: SSH-2009 1.1.1 Education in a European knowledge society Modern skills for young people in a knowledge society, contribution of SSH to the development of such skills, reduction of inequalities, role of actors (pupils, teachers, unions, employers, etc.) in reforming the education systems. Area 8.1.2 : Structural changes in the European knowledge economy and society Topic: SSH-2009 1.2.1 Growth and service industries Empirical analysis of service industries in Europe; focus on productivity, internationalisation, etc.; effectiveness of policy instruments.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.1: Growth, employment and competitiveness in a knowledge society the European case Area 8.1.3: Strengthening policy coherence and coordination in Europe Topic: SSH-2009 1.3.1 Public economic policy for growth Quality and effectiveness of public intervention in getting adequate growth (taxation government expenditure, public institution and regulation, etc.); policy options to support the Lisbon Stategy.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.2: Combining economic, social and environmental objectives in a European perspective Paths towards sustainable development Area 8.2.1: Socio-economic development trajectories Topic: SSH-2009 2.1.1 New socio-economic concepts, paradigm shift and territorial dynamics in a long term perspective New models, 2030-2050, energy-transport-environment-land-use, adaptation to global changes. Topic: SSH-2009 2.1.3 Impacts of corporate social responsibility Empirical evidence needed: tools & measurement on CSR impact at company/sectoral or spatial levels.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.2: Combining economic, social and environmental objectives in a European perspective Paths towards sustainable development Area 8.2.2: Regional, territorial and social cohesion Topic: SSH-2009 2.2.1 Social inequalities, their implications and policy options Increased or new social inequalities: social, cultural and political impact in the long(er) term.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.3: Major trends in society and their implications Area 8.3.2: Societal trends and lifestyles Topic: SSH-2009 3.2.1 Changes in consumption and consumer markets New trends in consumers' behaviours, social and cultural implications, factors influencing consumers' choice, link to sustainable development. Topic: SSH-2009 3.2.3 Quality of work and impact on quality of life and economy Better jobs (Lisbon): negative + positive working trends => synergies possible?

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.3: Major trends in society and their implications Area 8.3.3: Cultural interactions in an international perspective Topic: SSH-2009 3.3.1 Tolerance and cultural diversity Normative and conceptual approaches; historical and contemporary exemplars; role of educational systems. Topic: SSH-2009 3.3.2 Religion and secularism across Europe Interaction of religious and secular values, beliefs, practices and its consequences for policy formulation.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.4: Europe and the world Area 8.4.1: Interactions and interdependences between world regions and their implications Topic: SSH-2009 4.1.1 Competition and collaboration in access to oil, gas and mineral resources Role of markets, technology, international regulation, etc. in shaping competition and collaboration; link between efficiency, justice and fairness accross generations (time sacle up to newt 20-30 years).

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.4: Europe and the world Area 8.4.2: Conflicts, peace and human rights Topic: SSH-2009 4.2.2 Perspectives from outside the EU on human rights, democracy and peace Comparative analysis of what these mean and how they are practiced in different contexts; e.g. perceptions and legal status of human rights, different interactions between democracy and rule of law, different views of just peace (cooperation with researchers outside Europe is to be enhanced!)

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.5: The Citizen in the European Union Area 8.5.1: Participation and citizenship in Europe Topic: SSH-2009 5.1.1 Independent media and democracy in Europe Role of media in formation and consolidation of democracy; governance of media sector; media convergence and concentration; media pluralism and independence (For collaborative projects and/or BSG-CSO)

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.5: The Citizen in the European Union (2) Area 8.5.2: Diversities and commonalities in Europe Topic: SSH-2009 5.2.1 Vehicular languages in Europe in an era of globalisation: history, policy, practice Historical and contemporary instances globally; effects on cultural diversity as well as social and economic effects; power and identity. Topic: SSH-2009 5.2.2 Interrelation between collective representations and uses of history and cultural evolution in an enlarged Europe Formation of collective memory; its impact on perceptions of Europe s past, present and future. Topic: SSH-2009 5.2.3 Culture in the creation of a European space of communication Emergence of new transnational cultural communities in Europe; influence of technology and globalisation.

CALL SSH-2009-A Activity 8.7: Foresight activities - Area 8.7.1: Wide socio-economic foresight on key challenges Topic: SSH-2009 7.1.1 The World and Europe in 2025 In depth analysis of «alternative breakdown scenarios» of the world by 2025. Evaluation of consequences for the EU. Quantitative and qualitative analysis. (Expert groups are included) Topic: SSH-2009 7.1.2 Foresight on the long term challenges for the Mediterranean area Trends and drivers for the Mediterranean region; evolution towards 2025 (scenarios); economic, social, environment, cultural and political aspects. Quantitative and qualitative analysis. (Expert groups are included)

CALL SSH-2009-B Activity 8.2 : Combining economic, social and environmental objectives in a European perspective: paths towards sustainability Area 8.2.1: Socio-economic development trajectories Topic: SSH-2009 2.1.2 Cities and sustainable development Key issues for sustainable development issues in developing countries (more than 1.000.000 inhabitants); economic, social, cultural, environmental, governance aspects (China, India, Mexico, Brazil and African countries).

CALL SSH-2009-B Activity 8.4 : Europe and the world Area 8.4.2: Conflicts, peace and human rights Topic: SSH-2009 4.2.1 Climate induced changes in water resources in southern Europe and neighbouring countries as a threat to security Coordinated with the ENVIRONMENT Research Programme: focus here is on socio-economic-institutional aspects of mitigation, adaptation, conflict Prevention. Focus in ENV is on regional modelling. (Applicants should see both texts/calls, and choose where to apply)

CALL SSH-2009-C Activity 8.3 : Major trends in society and their implications Area 8.3.2: Social trends and lifestyles Topic: SSH-2009 3.2.2 Social platform on research for families and family policies Stock-taking => societal & policy needs + stakeholder participation => future research agenda

CALL SSH-2009-C Activity 8.4 : Europe in the World Area 8.4.1: Interactions and interdependences between world regions and their implications Topic: SSH-2009 4.1.2 Geopolitics and the role of Europe in a changing world Support to Area studies teams and institutions specialised in Asian, African Latin America, Middle East, Mediterranean, Russian studies; change in geopolitics regarding political power, distribution of wealth and resources, boarder conflicts.

CALL SSH-2009-C Activity 8.7 : Foresight activities Area 8.7.5: Mutual learning and co-operation Topic: SSH-2009 7.5.1 Consolidating the information system for foresight Scan and review Foresight exercises in Europe and in the World. Mutual learning and methodological focused workshops.

CALL SSH-2009-C Activity 8.8 : Horizontal actions Topic: SSH-2009 8.1 Measures to support the dissemination of research results Make as wide and broad as possible the dissemination and the uptake of the results from SSH research. Scientific community, policy makers, civil society organisations, and economic actors. pm: ERA NET in the field of statistics pm: ERA NET in the field of economy

Eligibility criteria (minimum) 2009 Work Programme Funding schemes Collaborative project: 3 MS or AC BSG CSO: 3 MS or AC, at least one CSO CSA CA: 3 MS or AC CSA SA: 1 legal entity CP SICA: 4 legal entities 2 from MS or AC and 2 from ICPC CP: Collaborative project (small or medium-scale focused research project) BSG-CSO: Research for Benefit of Specific Groups Civil Society Organisations CSA-CA: Coordination and Support Action Coordinating CSA-SA: Coordination and Support Action Supporting CP-SICA: Collaborative project Specific International Cooperation Action

2009 Work Programme Funding schemes Eligibility Criteria Financial Thresholds Maximum EC Requested Contribution Call A: Collaborative projects EUR 2.7 M Call A: BSG CSO EUR 1 M Call B: CP SICA EUR 3 M Call C: CSA CA and CSA SA no financial limits defined as eligibility criteria Proposals outside these financial limits will be considered ineligible.

2009 Work Programme Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria: (i) scientific and/or technological excellence, (ii) the potential impact through the development, (iii) dissemination and use of project results, the quality and efficiency of the implementation and management. Note: For Call A, the scientific and/or technological excellence evaluation criterion will include the following additional sub-criterion: 'appropriate comparative perspective and the largest possible European coverage in relation to the proposed research'.

In brief The second Call of SSH Programme offers great opportunities in terms of challenges, knowledge and methodological issues to be addressed. The scientific community of SSH should be enlarged due to the variety of issues and challenges, addressing different disciplines in an integrated way. All the EU countries and associated countries to the Framework Programme are encouraged to prepare their proposals as soon as possible.

Thank you for your attention!