Very Long Baseline Interferometry. Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

Similar documents
Practical Radio Interferometry VLBI. Olaf Wucknitz.

Practical Radio Interferometry VLBI. Olaf Wucknitz. Bonn, 21 November 2012

Practical Radio Interferometry VLBI. Olaf Wucknitz.

Introduction to Radio Astronomy. Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

VLBI techniques and LOFAR

VERY LONG BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY

Cormac Reynolds. ATNF Synthesis Imaging School, Narrabri 10 Sept. 2008

(The basics of) VLBI Basics. Pedro Elosegui MIT Haystack Observatory. With big thanks to many of you, here and out there

Volume 82 VERY LONG BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY AND THE VLBA. J. A. Zensus, P. J. Diamond, and P. J. Napier

Global (3)mm VLBI : a brief summary and overview of the standard data analysis path. T.P.Krichbaum

VLBI Post-Correlation Analysis and Fringe-Fitting

James M Anderson. in collaboration with Jan Noordam and Oleg Smirnov. MPIfR, Bonn, 2006 Dec 07

Very Long Baseline Interferometry

Propagation effects (tropospheric and ionospheric phase calibration)

Technical Considerations: Nuts and Bolts Project Planning and Technical Justification

Introduction to Interferometry. Michelson Interferometer. Fourier Transforms. Optics: holes in a mask. Two ways of understanding interferometry

High Speed Data Transmission and Processing Systems for e-vlbi Observations

LOFAR: Special Issues

VERY LONG BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY

Guide to observation planning with GREAT

The WVR at Effelsberg. Thomas Krichbaum

More Radio Astronomy

EVLA Scientific Commissioning and Antenna Performance Test Check List

EVLA Memo 105. Phase coherence of the EVLA radio telescope

A model for the SKA. Melvyn Wright. Radio Astronomy laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, ABSTRACT

VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY OBSERVATIONAL STATUS SUMMARY

Vie_SCHED_V22. Sun Jing 1 and David Mayer. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory

VLBI2010: In search of Sub-mm Accuracy

Why? When? How What to do What to worry about

The SKA, RFI and ITU Regulations

Planning (VLA) observations

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

INTERFEROMETRY: II Nissim Kanekar (NCRA TIFR)

Imaging and Calibration Algorithms for EVLA, e-merlin and ALMA. Robert Laing ESO

Radio Interferometry. Xuening Bai. AST 542 Observational Seminar May 4, 2011

Self-calibration. Elisabetta Liuzzo Rosita Paladino

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

Why Single Dish? Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson

To print higher-resolution math symbols, click the Hi-Res Fonts for Printing button on the jsmath control panel.

Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry

Basic Mapping Simon Garrington JBO/Manchester

A report on KAT7 and MeerKAT status and plans

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

and GPS Ionospheric Correction VLBA Scientic Memo No. 22 Version 1: May 1999 Abstract

Detection & Localization of L-Band Satellites using an Antenna Array

EVLA Memo #166 Comparison of the Performance of the 3-bit and 8-bit Samplers at C (4 8 GHz), X (8 12 GHz) and Ku (12 18 GHz) Bands

EVLA Memo #119 Wide-Band Sensitivity and Frequency Coverage of the EVLA and VLA L-Band Receivers

Comparing MMA and VLA Capabilities in the GHz Band. Socorro, NM Abstract

Sideband Smear: Sideband Separation with the ALMA 2SB and DSB Total Power Receivers

Random Phase Antenna Combining for SETI SETICon03

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 27 Jul 2016

Radio Interferometers Around the World. Amy J. Mioduszewski (NRAO)

Technology Development in Chinese VLBI Network

ATCA Antenna Beam Patterns and Aperture Illumination

Observing Modes and Real Time Processing

Correlator Development at Haystack. Roger Cappallo Haystack-NRAO Technical Mtg

Critical Evaluation of the Motorola M12+ GPS Timing Receiver vs. the Master Clock at the United States Naval Observatory, Washington DC.

Radio Interferometry -- II

Introduction to Radio Astronomy

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry. Robert Laing (ESO)

Introduction to Radio Interferometry Sabrina Stierwalt Alison Peck, Jim Braatz, Ashley Bemis

VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY OBSERVATIONAL STATUS SUMMARY

Practicalities of Radio Interferometry

Fundamentals of Interferometry

Observing the APOD satellite with the AuScope VLBI network

EVLA Memo 170 Determining full EVLA polarization leakage terms at C and X bands

Radio Data Archives. how to find, retrieve, and image radio data: a lay-person s primer. Michael P Rupen (NRAO)

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

Evolution of the Capabilities of the ALMA Array

??. 0. Hulbl~rt Center for Space Research Naval TEesearcl~ I.nhoratory, \I'ashingtom, I). C

November SKA Low Frequency Aperture Array. Andrew Faulkner

Modelling GPS Observables for Time Transfer

Signal Flow & Radiometer Equation. Aletha de Witt AVN-Newton Fund/DARA 2018 Observational & Technical Training HartRAO

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 131/7) a) that telecommunications between the Earth and stations in deep space have unique requirements;

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM * Measuring of low-level emissions from space stations at monitoring earth stations using noise reduction techniques

University of Groningen. The logistic design of the LOFAR radio telescope Schakel, L.P.

Spectral Line Observing

Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.364-5* PREFERRED FREQUENCIES AND BANDWIDTHS FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED NEAR-EARTH RESEARCH SATELLITES (Question 132/7)

ALMA Memo #289 Atmospheric Noise in Single Dish Observations Melvyn Wright Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley 29 February

High resolution/high frequency radio interferometry

Radio Astronomy for Amateurs. Presented by Keith Payea AG6CI

Developments in Expanding the Event Horizon Telescope: Phased ALMA and South Pole Telescope

VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY

Cross Correlators. Jayce Dowell/Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

Interferometry I Parkes Radio School Jamie Stevens ATCA Senior Systems Scientist

VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY

EVLA System Commissioning Results

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

Irbene radiotelescope RT-32

Smart Antennas in Radio Astronomy

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.733-1* (Question ITU-R 42/4 (1990))**

Radio Astronomy: SKA-Era Interferometry and Other Challenges. Dr Jasper Horrell, SKA SA (and Dr Oleg Smirnov, Rhodes and SKA SA)

EVLA Antenna and Array Performance. Rick Perley

LOFAR Long Baseline Calibration Commissioning

VLBA TEST MEMO NO. Report on Pie Town in ATD-5. J. Ray, J. Ryan, C. Ma. k D. Shaffer GSFC VLBI Group February 24. Summary:

Transcription:

Very Long Baseline Interferometry Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

1 Contents Introduction Principles and Practice of VLBI High angular resolution of long baselines The geophysics of long baselines Interferometer connection over long distances Recorded signals and off-line correlation The geopolitics of long baselines Some useful AIPS tasks for VLBI analysis

2 Introduction Very Long Baseline Interferometry: VLBI Use longest possible baselines on the Earth Use arrays of 10 antennas: EVN and VLBA Use baseline from Earth to a radio telescope on an orbiting satellite: VSOP mission. Higher angular resolution imaging for finer structural detail Higher precision astrometry

Traditionally realized without real-time signal links between antennas Local autonomous telescope control, executing a pre-distributed observing schedule to synchronise telescopes in the array Independent local oscillator signals Local sampling of voltage signals and recording on tapes (and disks) Later off-line replay of sampled voltage signals for multiplication at a correlator; JIVE, Bonn, VLBA-Socorro Modern realization of real-time VLBI

3 Principles and Practice of VLBI Basic principles are exactly the same as for any other radio interferometry. Realization of long baselines involves practical differences It is instructive to group the reasons why these arise under a number of headings: High angular resolution of long baselines The geophysics of long baselines Interferometer connection over long distances Recorded signals and off-line correlation The geopolitics of long baselines!

4 High angular resolution of long baselines Longer baselines magnify the effect of small angular quantities

Increased phase difference between 2 points in the sky produces better angular resolution of target source! Need small pixels! AIPS IMAGR, CELLSIZE=0.0004 But also on amplitude calibrators - they may be heavily resolved Generally cannot rely on point source amplitude calibrators Calibration by radiometry (SEFD) of individual antennas We calibrate the noise level and hence the correlation in Jy AIPS tasks ANTAB APCAL CLCAL May need to correct for bias in the digital representation of the voltage if the sampler levels are not correct. This correction is done at the EVN correlator at JIVE, but not at the VLBA correlator. AIPS tasks FITLD (option DIGICOR=) and ACCOR

Larger holes in the u,v plane Missing flux if interferometer array does not have sufficiently short baselines Characteristic brightness temperature lower limit for detection given by shortest baseline in the array. Source must be sufficiently compact (i.e. have sufficiently high brightness temperature) to be detectable This limit is much higher for VLBI because the shortest baselines are usually longer! T b > 10 8-10 12 ; synchrotron emission, maser emission

Increased path difference produced by small angular errors Need more accurate angular geometry to ensure path difference is less than 1/b More accurate source positions 1 arcsec with 5 km baseline; 2.4 cm (144 o at 5 GHz) 1 arcsec with 5000 km baseline; 24 m (80 nanoseconds; 12 MHz) Smaller delay beam; decreased field of view Earth Orientation Parameters (UT1-UTC, position of the pole) GR deflection due to the Sun is important over whole sky Need finer frequency sampling at the correlator (0.5 MHz) Can be achieved with multi-lag correlation

Increase rate-of-change of phase errors Residual fringe rate, f Cannot average data longer than a time 1/f Smaller fringe-rate beam; decreased field of view Need finer time sampling at the correlator (1 s) May need shorter time intervals in AIPS CL table Finer time and frequency sampling of the visibility function increases the volume of data!

As with other interferometers we must calibrate phase errors. Phase self-calibration leads to a detection threshold i.e. must have sufficient signal-to-noise ratio in the solution interval Need to average data in frequency and time to achieve this Need to determine the unknown residual delay and residual fringe-rate to permit this averaging Fringe Fitting procedure is used to determine the residual fringe rate and delay Forms averages of the data in time and frequency with a range of trial fringe rates and delays, and determines which values maximise the signal. Requires enough signal-to-noise to recognise the signal so sets a minimum correlated flux density threshold for detection

AIPS task FRING does a global search for all baselines simultaneously, making use of the fact that the residual delay and fringe rate on a baseline may be expressed as the difference between antenna-based delay and rate residuals FRING also incorporates a phase self-calibration solution with a default point-source model For an N-antenna array, FRING determines (N-1) antennabased phase, fringe-rate and delay solutions with respect to a reference antenna whose residuals are assigned to zero. Note that the act of averaging the visibility function, using the residual delays and fringe rates determined by FRING, decreases the field of view of the averaged data.

5 The geophysics of long baselines The Earth is round It is surrounded with a layer of neutral and ionized gas It is not entirely solid Source has different elevations at different antennas Short time of mutual visibility for low declination sources Galactic Centre source not visible on transatlantic baselines Program SCHED for planning observing sequence For a VLBI array there may be much more data for short baselines than for long baselines

Parallactic angles are different for azimuth/elevation mounted antennas at different sites. Need to use feeds which respond to a circular polarization mode to get correlation The parallactic angle difference for the 2 antennas of a baseline introduces an additional phase term which is not corrected by the correlator, and is of opposite sign for RHC and LHC It may be necessary to correct for this when making polarization VLBI observations, or when averaging LHC and RHC correlations together, or when doing phase-reference observations if the target and reference source have different parallactic angles. AIPS task CLCOR, option PANG

Non-equal tropospheric paths For very short baselines (< 5 km) we assume that the tropospheric paths of the signals to the 2 antennas have the same physical length and that the temporal fluctuations along them are the same. The increased path lengths, and temporal phase fluctuations, cancel. For longer baselines (> 10 km) we assume the tropospheric paths have the same physical length but that temporal phase fluctuations are independent along the 2 paths. The increased path lengths cancel but the phase fluctations do not, and appear in the measured visibility function. They must by removed (be phase-referencing or phase selfcalibration)

For VLBI the physical paths through the troposphere have very different lengths because of the different elevations of the antennas. The increased path lengths do not cancel but produce a relative delay, τ, which is a function of the zenith delays, z and the elevations e for the 2 antennas (A,B): τ = z A /cos(e A ) z B /cos(e B ) In order to equalize the paths for correlation, a model of the tropospheric delay is needed. Phase-reference observations Target and phase-reference source observations are alternated, and the phase measured on the reference is used to calibrate the tropospheric phase fluctuations on the target. Note that τ target and τ reference are not equal and it is therefore essential to have a model for the tropospheric delay path.

Non-equal ionospheric paths More significant at low frequencies Varies with time of day, latitude, Solar cycle... Zenith delay increase can be very different for different antennas It is unpredictable so no correction is made for this by VLBI correlators. For phase-referenced observations it may be necessary to correct for the ionospheric path increases after correlation, using an ionospheric model derived from GPS data. AIPS task TECOR Telescopes may be on different tectonic plates Telescope baselines can change by cm per year Telescopes at different longitudes experience different displacements due to solid Earth tides ( 10 cm).

6 Interferometer connection over long distances Could control telescopes centrally in real time over telephone/internet lines (but we don t..) Cannot easily use cables, waveguides or microwave links to bring the wideband (e.g. 128 MHz) signals together. Cannot easily distribute common LO signal (but may use satellite link for SKA)

Use independent LOs derived from Hydrogen maser frequency standard Phase stability of 1 part in 10 14 Sampling of signal voltages controlled by accurate local clock. Encode time signals to identify each sampled bit Accurate monitoring of observatory clocks using GPS ( 100 nanoseconds)

evlbi: Bring bit-streams together via internet, or satellite, or dedicated optical fibres Real-time correlation, with suitably large buffer to accommodate large astronomical and terrestrial delay between bitstreams. Corresponding bits must be matched and multiplied Need to take account of local clock and clock-rate differences using fringe fitting evlbi is being developed at present

7 Recorded signals and off-line correlation VLBI traditionally performed by recording the bit-streams and the encoded clock information on magnetic tape (and now computer disks) Replace cables, optical fibres, internet with airplanes, ships and trucks Assemble all the recorded bit-streams at the correlator, some weeks later Synchronised replay of the recorded bit-streams under computer control The correlator need not know they are not in real time! Tape recorded radio interferometry was the only possibility in the late 1960 s when VLBI was first performed

The main difficulty is to write, record and replay a sufficiently high bit-rate Bit-rate = twice the bandwidth Initially done using computer tape ( 100 khz bandwidth) 1974: NRAO Mk2 system; 2 MHz (4 Mbps) Using professional TV video recorders (later VCRs) Further translation of IF signal to baseband (0-2 MHz) using baseband converter (also video-converter) before sampling the voltages. 1979: Haystack Mk3 system; 28 Mk2s in parallel 28 separate 2 MHz channels (112 Mbps) 14 baseband converters (upper and lower sidebands) longitudinal recording on 1 magnetic tape at 3m/s with 28 parallel tracks!

1980 s VLBA and Mk4 recording systems 8 separate 8 MHz channels (128 Mb/s for 1 bit per sample) 4 separate 8 MHz channels (128 Mb/s for 2 bits per sample) 8 separate 8 MHz channels (256 Mb/s for 2 bits per sample) etc... Can have 4 channels RHC and 4 channels LHC for polarization VLBI Can have 4 channels 2.3 GHz and 4 channels 8.4 GHz 2004: Mk5 disk-based recording Increases possible bit-rate to 1024 Mbps

The main effect from using recorded interferometry comes from the (traditional) use of multiple channels of relatively narrow bandwidth (in AIPS multiple IFs ) Different basebands have different instrumental phase errors The instrumental phase differences between basebands are generally fairly constant with time during an experiment Need to calibrate these phase offsets in order to average the IFs to get better signal-to-noise ratio (e.g. for FRING or CALIB) VLBA has phase-cal system; a series of standard tones is inserted in the RF signal band and the phases are measured in each baseband. AIPS tasks PCLOD and PCCOR are used to apply these phase corrections

In the absence of a phase-cal signal, a strong source can be used to determine the relative phase between basebands. Known as manual phase-cal Use FRING to determine instrumental phase in each IF separately

The use of off-line correlation instead of realtime correlation has little effect for most observations. Correlation can be repeated if replay is poor or if mistakes are made! Multiple-pass correlation can be performed in certain special cases: If the number of telescopes exceeds the number of playback units (> 16 for JIVE; > 20 for VLBA) If 2 separate field-centres in the primary telescope beams are to be correlated The data on the tape delivered from the correlator may not be in strict time-baseline, tb order Use AIPS task MSORT to order it if desired

8 The geopolitics of long baselines Long baselines tend to cross international borders! Leads naturally to international collaboration for performing VLBI observations. Example: the European VLBI Network (EVN) Use of recorded VLBI makes it easy to use a variety of different radio telescopes, built for other purposes. Telescopes in such an array can have a large range of sizes, sensitivities, beamwidths, etc Different baselines in the array can have very different sensitivities Need to consider carefully how to weight the data from different baselines when performing mapping and self-calibration In AIPS, consider calibrate the weights (DOCALIB=2)

Organization and operation of an international array such as the EVN has to involve many different national funding agencies (unlike the US VLBA). Telescopes available for the EVN depends on observing frequency.

Some observing options: EVN (9+ telescopes at 1.7 GHz and 5 GHz, 8+ at 6 GHz) VLBA (10 telescopes at a range of frequencies) Global array of VLBA + EVN (16+ telescopes) Global 3mm VLBI array (13 telescopes) The High Sensitivity Array (HSA): VLBA + GBT + VLA + ARECIBO + EFFELSBERG

9 Some useful AIPS tasks for VLBI analysis FITLD to read in data (DIGICOR option for VLBA correlator) MSORT if data not in TB order FXPOL is sometimes needed to fix wrongly-labelled polarization channels from the VLBA correlator! ACCOR determines amplitude corrections from sampling level errors for each antenna and writes an SN table (for VLBA correlator) CLCOR with option PANG to make parallactic angle correction in a CL table if necessary

ANTAB reads external file of amplitude calibration radiometry and produces TY (system temperature) and GC (gain curve) tables. APCAL extracts amplitude calibration data from TY and GC tables and writes an SN table. PCLOD reads external file of phase-cal data and writes a PC table PCCOR extracts phase-cal information from PC table and writes an SN table

CLCAL interpolates SN table values into a CL (calibration) table FRING determines (antenna-based) residual phase, delay and fringe-rate by self-calibration and writes an SN table. Can be used to determine IF instrumental phase offsets. CALIB for self-calibration of antenna phases and amplitudes SPLIT to apply accumulated calibration (maybe calibrate the weights) and to average frequencies (and possibly IFs )