Relay Coordination in the Protection of Radially- Connected Power System Network

Similar documents
POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS TADP 641 SETTING OF OVERCURRENT RELAYS

Electrical Protection System Design and Operation

Optimum Coordination of Overcurrent Relays: GA Approach

9 Overcurrent Protection for Phase and Earth Faults

Adaptive Relaying of Radial Distribution system with Distributed Generation

Time-current Coordination

Overcurrent relays coordination using MATLAB model

POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS TADP 641 SETTING EXAMPLE FOR OVERCURRENT RELAYS

Busbars and lines are important elements

PROTECTIVE DEVICES CO-ORDINATTION TOOLBOX ENHANCED BY AN EMBEDDED EXPERT SYSTEM - MEDIUM AND LOW VOLTAGE LEVELS

POWER SYSTEM PRINCIPLES APPLIED IN PROTECTION PRACTICE. Professor Akhtar Kalam Victoria University

U I. Time Overcurrent Relays. Basic equation. More or less approximates thermal fuse. » Allow coordination with fuses 9/24/2018 ECE525.

Feeder Protection Challenges with High Penetration of Inverter Based Distributed Generation

Power System Protection Manual

Protection Basics Presented by John S. Levine, P.E. Levine Lectronics and Lectric, Inc GE Consumer & Industrial Multilin

Protection of a 138/34.5 kv transformer using SEL relay

Overcurrent Protective Relays

RAIDK, RAIDG, RAPDK and RACIK Phase overcurrent and earth-fault protection assemblies based on single phase measuring elements

FRIENDS Devices and their Coordination

Overcurrent and Overload Protection of AC Machines and Power Transformers

Protection Introduction

Protecting Feeders With Distributed Resource Scott Elling HDR Inc HDR, all rights reserved.

Delayed Current Zero Crossing Phenomena during Switching of Shunt-Compensated Lines

UPGRADING SUBSTATION RELAYS TO DIGITAL RECLOSERS AND THEIR COORDINATION WITH SECTIONALIZERS

Notes 1: Introduction to Distribution Systems

Micro grid Protection Using Digital Relays Mr.Karthik.P 1, Mrs.Belwin J. Brearley 2

Coordination of overcurrent relay using Hybrid GA- NLP method

Bus Protection Fundamentals

A Tutorial on the Application and Setting of Collector Feeder Overcurrent Relays at Wind Electric Plants

DISTRIBUTION DEVICE COORDINATION

NERC Protection Coordination Webinar Series June 9, Phil Tatro Jon Gardell

S&C Vista Underground Distribution Switchgear Outdoor Distribution

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Power Quality Basics. Presented by. Scott Peele PE

A NEW DIRECTIONAL OVER CURRENT RELAYING SCHEME FOR DISTRIBUTION FEEDERS IN THE PRESENCE OF DG

Testing of Circuit Breaker and over Current Relay Implementation by Using MATLAB / SIMULINK

CHAPTER 2 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM OVERCURRENTS

Delayed Current Zero Crossing Phenomena During Switching of Shunt-Compensated Lines

Predicting the Voltage Sag Performance of Electricity Distribution Networks

Voltage Sag Mitigation by Neutral Grounding Resistance Application in Distribution System of Provincial Electricity Authority

ARC FLASH PPE GUIDELINES FOR INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS

Earth Fault Relay EFSPL-1A/5A

Breaker Pole Scatter and Its Effect on Quadrilateral Ground Distance Protection

PROTECTION of electricity distribution networks

Numbering System for Protective Devices, Control and Indication Devices for Power Systems

OVERCURRENT RELAY COORDINATION IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. (A CASE STUDY ON PHUENTSHOLING LOW VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION NETWORK)

3. (a) List out the advantages and disadvantages of HRC fuse (b) Explain fuse Characteristics in detail. [8+8]

Transmission System Phase Backup Protection

This section applies to the requirements for the performance of power system studies by both the Design Engineer and the Contractor.

Transformer Protection

OVERCURRENT PROTECTION RELAY GRD110

BED INTERCONNECTION TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

CHAPTER 3 OVER CURRENT AND EARTH FAULT RELAY COORDINATION

Distance Protection in Distribution Systems: How It Assists With Integrating Distributed Resources

Improvement of Electricity Distribution Services Using a DVR with a Constant DC Voltage Source Instaled in MV Connection Substations

MV network design & devices selection EXERCISE BOOK

Shortcomings of the Low impedance Restricted Earth Fault function as applied to an Auto Transformer. Anura Perera, Paul Keller

Operation Analysis of Current Transformer with Transient Performance Analysis Using EMTP Software

Chapter # : 17 Symmetrical Fault Calculations

Verifying Transformer Differential Compensation Settings

IDAHO PURPA GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION REQUEST (Application Form)

POWER SYSTEM BACKUP PROTECTION USING SYNCHRONIZED PMU

Types CDG 11 and CDG 16 Inverse Time Overcurrent and Earth Fault Relay

DG TRANSFER CONNECTION SCHEME IN ACTIVE DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

Distance Protection for Distribution Feeders. Presented By: Yordan Kyosev, P.Eng. & Curtis Ruff, P.Eng.

Transmission Line Protection Objective. General knowledge and familiarity with transmission protection schemes

System grounding of wind farm medium voltage cable grids

Techniques for the Control of Steady State Voltage in MV and LV Networks

IDENTIFICATION OF THE OPTIMUM PROTECTION CO-ORDINATION IN MEDIUM VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OF SRI LANKA

TABLE OF CONTENT

A Distance Based Protection Scheme for Distribution Systems with Distributed Generators

EH27401 Communication and Control in Electric Power Systems Lecture 2. Lars Nordström

Technical T TECHNICAL. C o n t e n t s SPEEDFAX TM 2017

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. Guidelines and Technical Basis Draft 5: (August 2, 2013) Page 1 of 76

Unsymmetrical Fault Analysis & Protection Of The Existing Power System

Multimeter 500CVD21 RTU500 series

CHAPTER 3 REVIEW OF POWER TRANSFORMER PROTECTION SCHEMES

Directional Overcurrent Relays Coordination Restoration by Reducing Minimum Fault Current Limiter Impedance

Short-Circuit Current Calculations

Unit 3 Magnetism...21 Introduction The Natural Magnet Magnetic Polarities Magnetic Compass...21

Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Electrical Energy Systems

NERC Protection Coordination Webinar Series June 16, Phil Tatro Jon Gardell

DIGITAL EARTH FAULT RELAY

Conventional Paper-II-2011 Part-1A

IV/IV B.Tech (Regular) DEGREE EXAMINATION. Electrical &Electronics Engineering

1960 Research Drive, Suite 100, Troy, Michigan with. REVISION: December 10, 2007 (Supersedes previous versions) Prepared by:

Preface...x Chapter 1 Electrical Fundamentals

Pak. J. Biotechnol. Vol. 13 (special issue on Innovations in information Embedded and Communication Systems) Pp (2016)

BE Semester- VI (Electrical Engineering) Question Bank (E 605 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM - II) Y - Y transformer : 300 MVA, 33Y / 220Y kv, X = 15 %

UProtection Requirements. Ufor a Large scale Wind Park. Shyam Musunuri Siemens Energy

Impact Assessment Generator Form

Phase earthing system - method for faulty phase selection with phase-to-earth faults. Ari Nikander Tampere University of Technology

PHYSICAL PHENOMENA EXISTING IN THE TURBOGENERATOR DURING FAULTY SYNCHRONIZATION WITH INVERSE PHASE SEQUENCE*

GRID CODE COMPATIBLE PROTECTION SCHEME FOR SMART GRIDS

In power system, transients have bad impact on its

SECTION SHORT CIRCUIT, COMPONENT PROTECTION, FLASH HAZARD AND SELECTIVE COORDINATION STUDY

DIGITAL EARTH FAULT RELAY

Transmission Protection Overview

R10. IV B.Tech I Semester Regular/Supplementary Examinations, Nov/Dec SWITCH GEAR AND PROTECTION. (Electrical and Electronics Engineering)

In order to minimise distribution (11 and 22 kv) feeder breaker

Transcription:

Relay Coordination in the Protection of Radially- Connected Power System Network Zankhana Shah Electrical Department, Kalol institute of research centre, Ahemedabad-Mehshana Highway, kalol, India 1 zankhu.shah@gmail.com Abstract Protective relays detect intolerable or unwanted conditions within an assigned area, and then trip or open one or more circuit breakers to isolate the problem area before it can damage or otherwise interfere with the effective operation of the rest of the power system. It often happens that a substation feeder relay and supply-side relay both trip for the same feeder fault. This occurrence, known as over-trip is undesirable, and is usually blamed on poor relay coordination. The relay and breaker nearest to the point of fault must be able to see the fault and operate before other relays in the system so that healthy parts of the system will not be interrupted. How to achieve this is the subject of this paper. Keywords Relay, Fault, Trip, Coordinating Time Interval, Feeder I. INTRODUCTION When a feeder fault causes the supply side relay to trip, not only are the customers on the faulted feeder inconvenienced with an outage, but all the customers that are being served by the other feeders from the same supply-side relay and breaker also experience an outage. Therefore necessary discrimination must be enabled during fault conditions. This can be achieved in the following ways [1]: (a) By monitoring only current level - current grading (b) By monitoring time delayed operation - time grading. II. APPLICATION A. Current grading With reference to figure 1, correct discrimination can be achieved with instantaneous overcurrent relays by setting R 2 at lower current than R 1. Thus, the current setting of a relay nearer the source must always be higher than the setting of the preceding relay. The current in the feeder between B and C is 500A and the current between A and B is 200 + 500 = 700A. The relays must have current settings which are higher than any current which can flow through the relays under normal conditions i.e. 110% of the rated current. Electronic and microprocessor- based relays have current setting steps of 5% [2], [3]. The current setting of the relay, R 2 = 69; The setting of R1 should be at least If relay R2 were given a higher setting than R1 mal-operation would occur in the protection. In any case, in the event of short circuit beyond R2 downstream, large currents much greater than 800A would flow, and the two relays would trip at the same time. Current grading will therefore not be suitable. B. Time grading Selectivity during fault conditions would be achieved by using relays set to operate after different time delays. The difference in operating times between upstream and downstream relays for discrimination or coordination purposes is called coordinating time interval (CTI). As stated earlier, the goal is to allow enough time for the relay and breaker closest to the fault to clear the fault from the system before the relay associated with the adjacent section nearer to the source could initiate the opening of its circuit breaker. For example, the feeder relay and breaker, which are downstream, should clear a feeder fault before the supplyside relay and breaker (upstream) could trip. Generally, CTI of about 0.4 seconds is allowed. This CTI takes the following into consideration [4]: Breaker fault-interruption time is taken as 0.15s. Over travel of the induction disk or solid-state relay after the fault current has been interrupted is provided for by 0.1s. A safety margin of 0.15s to compensate for possible deviations in calculated fault currents, relay tap selection, relay operating time, and current transformer ratio errors. III. GRADING USING RELAYS WITH DEFINITE OPERATING TIMES Let us illustrate this phenomenon with figure 2 shown below. Network parameters: G: 2MVA, 10%; T 1 : 2MVA, 11/3.3KV, 7%; T 2 : 500KVA, 3.3/0.415KV, 6%; Lines 1, 2, 3: 0.02 /ph; Line 5: 0.2/ph; Line 8: 0.2/ph; System MVA base = 20MVA; Positive and negative sequence impedances are assumed equal. [1] IJEDR1401107 International Journal of Engineering Development and Research (www.ijedr.org) 600

In this network, for a fault at the point F 1, relays R 1, R 2 and R 3 must not operate in less than 0.5s. Reactance of G = 1p:u; Reactance of T1 = 0:7p:u; Reactance of Line 8 = 0:367p:u; Reactance of Line 5 = 0:367p:u; Reactance of T2 = 2:4p:u; Reactance of Line 1 = 2:323p:u; Fig 1. Current discrimination in a radially-connected network A three-phase fault gives the highest short- circuit current. This current is applied in the settings for the protection to be used [5]. The fault current, I for three-phase fault at the points are: F 1 : A Similarly, F 2 : I = 5756A, F 3 : I = 1437A, F 4 : I = 1693A, F 5 : I = 2058A. According to the maximum ratings of the lines, and allowing 100% setting, the current settings of the relays should be as follows: R 1 = 200A; R 5 = 105A; R 8 = 280A; R 10 = 105A. It can be seen that with instantaneous over-current re lays, if current of 400A, for example, due to over- load flows in line1, relay R1 only will trip, giving correct discrimination. But for fault current of 3888A at point F 1, R 10 would operate instantly since this is about 1.5 times its setting. This is undesirable. So it is necessary to add time discrimination with time settings increasing towards the source, as shown in figure 3. Figure 2 Protection of radially-connected network. The time settings of the relays are: R 1 : 0.5s, R 5 : 0.9s and R 8 : 1.3s; R 10 = 1.7s. Thus for the protection of a network containing several sections in series as shown in figure 2, the relay nearest to the source may have un- acceptably high operating times for faults in the sections they protect. In other words, the tripping time for a fault near the power source may be dangerously high [6]. This is because the current level associated with such faults is large and destructive, and must be removed very quickly. Therefore relays with definite time lags are suit- able for the protection of networks with relatively few series-connected sections only. 2.2.2. Time grading using relays with inverse time/current characteristics In these relays tripping time is inversely proportional to the current magnitude. We apply inverse definite minimum-time (IDMT)' relay with normal inverse characteristic given as [7] Tp (1) IJEDR1401107 International Journal of Engineering Development and Research (www.ijedr.org) 601

Where t = tripping time of relay, Tp = time multiplier setting (TMS), I = fault current, IS = set pick-up current. So for relay R 1 in figure 2, I = 3886A (fault at point F1), I S = 200A, t = 0.5s. Table 1: Summary of settings. Relay I S (A) T P R 1 200 0.22 R 5 105 0.24 R 8 280 0.24 R 10 105 0.3 Note that it is assumed that R 1 operated in 0.5s to discriminate from the relay which operates in 0.1s [2]. Therefore, from equation (1), t = 2:29 T P. So if the relay R 1 is set at 1.0 (TMS), it would operate in 2.29s. However, as R 1 is required to operate in 0.5s, Tp is equal to 0.22, which is now the relay setting. For three- phase fault at point F 2, I = 5756A. This is the maximum possible short circuit current that can flow in line 1, i.e., the fault level. Therefore the time, t which relay R 1 takes to interrupt this current is computed as: So the tripping time of R 1 has now been reduced to 0.44s For R 5 : IS = 105A, t = 0.44 + 0.4 = 0.84s, Tp = 0.24. The maximum fault current which relay R5 would have to deal with is 1437A.The operating time of R5 for this current is 2.6 0.24 = 0.62s. For R 8 : IS =280A, t = 0.62 + 0.4 = 1.02s, Tp = 0.24. The fault current level of line 8 is 1693.The operating time of R8 for this current is 3.82 0.24 = 0.92s. Fig 3 Discrimination achieved with definite-time Overcurrent relay ForR 10 : IS =105A, t = 0.92 + 0.4 = 1.31s, Tp = 0.3. The maximum fault current that would go through relay R 10 is 616A. The operating time of R 10 for this current is 3.9 s 0.3 = 1.17s Table 2: Fault currents and trip times of relays Fault locati on Fault current I (A) Trip time T (S) R 1 R 5 R 8 R 10 F 1 3888 0.5 1.07 2.99 6.28 F 2 5756 0.44 0.84 1.74 2.87 F 3 1437 0.36 0.62 1.02 1.47 F 4 1693 0.35 0.58 0.92 1.31 F 5 2058 0.34 0.55 0.83 1.17 The tripping times of the relays for the various fault currents are shown in table 2, and the trip time/current curves follow in figures 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d. IJEDR1401107 International Journal of Engineering Development and Research (www.ijedr.org) 602

(a) Trip time characteristic of inverse time over-current protection of relay R 1 (b) Trip time characteristic of inverse time over-current protection relay R 5 (c) Trip time characteristic of inverse time over-current pro- tection relay R 8 (d) Trip time characteristic of inverse time over-current protection relay R 10. Fig.4 a,b,c,d From the graphs, it is clear that tripping time is inversely proportional to the magnitude of fault current. As fault current increases, trip time de- creases. IJEDR1401107 International Journal of Engineering Development and Research (www.ijedr.org) 603

IV. CONCLUSIONS Obviously, to obtain correct discrimination, relays with inverse time/current characteristics are preferred. They give rapid clearance for large faults and sustained over-loads. Current grad- ing using instantaneous over-current relays have very limited use. They can only be applied where there is abrupt difference in magnitude between fault current within the protected section and fault current outside it. In radial circuits with many sections in series, application of relays with definite operating time results in the tripping time for a fault near the power source being dangerously high. REFERENCES [1] C. Christopoulos, A. Wright. Electrical Power System Protection, Kluwer Academic Publishers, [2] T. Davies. Protection of Industrial Power Sys- tems, Newnes, 2001. [3] Sachdev, M.S. Microprocessor Relays and Protec- tion Systems, IEEE Tutorial Course, 88EH0269-1-PWR, 1988. [4] Michael Ray Russell, Russ Poteet. Transmission and Distribution World, October, 1998. [5] B.M. Weedy, Electric Power Systems, John Wi- ley and Sons, 1975. [6] A.R. van C. Warrington, Protective Relays: Their Theory and Practice, Chapman and Hall, 1971. [7] 7SJ600 V2 - Siemens Relay Manual. IJEDR1401107 International Journal of Engineering Development and Research (www.ijedr.org) 604