MLPA NCSR Baseline Seabird Nearshore Foraging and Feeding Flock Monitoring Protocol Point Blue Conservation Science

Similar documents
COMPREHENSIVE SEABIRD MONITORING FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION AND FUTURE EVALUATION OF MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN CALIFORNIA S NORTH COAST STUDY REGION

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report. Use of Estuarine, Intertidal, and Subtidal Habitats by Seabirds Within the MLPA South Coast Study Region

44. MARINE WILDLIFE Introduction Results and Discussion. Marine Wildlife Cook Inlet

Use of Estuarine, Intertidal, and Subtidal Habitats by Seabirds Within the MLPA South Coast Study Region. Final Plan of Work.

Annual Report to SeaGrant. Agreement No. R/MPA-6B

Final Report Beach Watch Baseline Analysis of Birds, Mammals, and Human Use in the North Central Coast Baseline Monitoring of Marine Protected Areas

Wildlife distributions and habitat use on the mid-atlantic Outer Continental Shelf

Central California. 600,000 breeding seabirds + 8 million people (SF Bay Area) Potential for disturbance is high!

PASSPORT. Marine Protected Areas of California s Central Coast

Species: Birds (seabirds, shorebirds, waterfowl, raptors, passerines) and marine mammals

Site Description: Gull Rock is located approximately 0.4 miles offshore and about six miles north of Yaquina Head in Lincoln County, Oregon.

STATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2009 BREEDING SEASON

Marine birds, mammals, and PICES: Brief history and roadmap for the future

STATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2010 BREEDING SEASON

Seabird Monitoring at the Cape Perpetua and Cape Falcon Marine Reserves

Conceptual framework for food web links between seabirds and fish in the estuary, plume, and nearshore ocean of the Columbia River

Template for all pages First page. Research Education Conservation Stewardship

Comprehensive Seabird Baseline Monitoring in the MLPA North Coast Study Region. Revised Plan of Work, January 23, 2014

BC Coastal Waterbird Survey Protocol. Instructions for Participants

Chapter 33 Offshore Population Estimates of Marbled Murrelets in California

GOA NAVY TRAINING ACTIVITIES FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIS/OEIS JULY 2016

Wildlife Inventory Plan Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Protocol #28. Version 1.2. Parameter: Populations

First page. - Helping Seabirds Thrive -

Seabird Monitoring on Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge

Acknowledgments. Special thanks to Devin Givens, Inverness Yacht Club members, and Ryan Bartling, California Department of Fish and Wildlife

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report

7th WIOMSA Scientific Symposium, Mombasa, Kenya Seabird and marine IBA session summary Mombasa, Kenya, October 2011

Marbled Murrelet Effectiveness Monitoring, Northwest Forest Plan

AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE ON AUGUST 24, 1973

Farallon National Wildlife Refuge Backgrounder PRBO Conservation Science Page 1 of 5

Sea Birds. Copyright 2012 LessonSnips

Collaboration and Planning to Implement the South San Diego Bay Restoration and Enhancement Project

Summaries of Sub-regional Trends in Density Indices PROCEEDINGS 1

Geographic Response Plan Map: SFL-31. Bradley. Map continued Key on: SFL-34. Key. Murray Key XXX SFL Clive Key XXX. SFL31-06 Clive Key

Use of Estuarine, Intertidal, and Subtidal Habitats by Seabirds Within the MLPA South Coast Study Region

International perspective: contribution to a European approach

Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29

Marine Mammal and Seabird Surveys

Walking beaches, volunteers amass data on dead seabirds 8 November 2017, by Phuong Le

DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SEA DUCKS AND DIVING DUCKS ON LAKE ST. CLAIR AND W. LAKE ERIE

Digital Aerial Baseline Surveys of Marine Wildlife

LANZ AND COX ISLANDS PROVINCIAL PARK

Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35

Yaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2015 Season Summary

MARINE BIRDS. Comparison of populations of dominant marine bird between the western and eastern North Pacific are:

Simon Says WHAT S INSIDE PROTECTED AREAS IN THE SANCTUARY HOW IS SIMON INVOLVED?

HIGH-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION IN THE PRESENCE OF OCEANOGRAPHIC VARIABILITY

Project Number: H Project Title:

Biological Inventories

Siuslaw River Estuary BCS number 47-32

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Threats affecting seabirds Coastal development in Greece

SPECIES PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION Protective Radius

Brominated Flame Retardants: Spatial and Temporal Patterns and Trends in Seabird eggs from the Nearshore Pacific Coast of Canada

State of the Estuary Report 2015

WATER BIRDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF NEARSHORE FORAGING SEABIRDS IN RELATION TO A COASTAL MARINE RESERVE

Marine mammal monitoring

Baseline Characterization of Sandy Beach Ecosystems in California s North Central Coast Region

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

ebird and Citizen Science:

45. THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES AND SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Winter Marine Bird Surveys

MICHIGAN NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY PHASE I FINAL REPORT

Final Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon State Office Portland, OR

3 March 2015 The Director Sustainable Fisheries Section Department of the Environment GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601

Pelagic Seabirds of San Juan Channel

Approved for Public Release FINAL REPORT Distribution Unlimited

Marbled Murrelet Effectiveness Monitoring, Northwest Forest Plan

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation October 23, 2003 AÑO NUEVO ISLAND HABITAT RESTORATION. File No Project Manager: Mary Travis

ESTABLISHING A PROTOCOL FOR SYSTEMATIC SURVEYS OF STRANDED MARINE MAMMALS IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY. Mary Elizabeth Pacewicz. A Thesis Presented to

DISTRIBUTION, AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF THE COMMON DOLPHIN DELPHINUS DELPHIS IN THE BAY OF BISCAY

ANNE VALLEE (TRIANGLE ISLAND) ECOLOGICAL RESERVE

I know that during the winter you migrate. But where do you come from in the spring?

SEABIRD AND MARINE MAMMAL MONITORING AT GUALALA POINT ISLAND, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MAY TO AUGUST Prepared by Ron LeValley

Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Risk Assessment of Vessel Traffic on Endangered Blue and Humpback Whales in the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries

Available Informa/on and Data Gaps: Birds, Bats, Marine Mammals, Sea Turtles and Threatened & Endangered Species

AERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL Edward J. Mallek 1 and Christian P. Dau 2

Identifying Ecological Hotspots in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas

Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) Statewide Reproductive Performance in. California in

AERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL 2003

MARINE BIRD SURVEYS AT BOGOSLOF ISLAND, ALASKA, IN 2005

MULTI-TEMPORAL SATELLITE IMAGES WITH BATHYMETRY CORRECTION FOR MAPPING AND ASSESSING SEAGRASS BED CHANGES IN DONGSHA ATOLL

Anthropogenic Noise and Marine Mammals

BIRD READING ASSIGNMENT

Update on American Oystercatcher Reseach and Conservation in New Jersey

Yaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2017 Season Summary

Pe l a g i c Res e rv es fo r Ma r i n e To p Pr e d a t o r s:

Visual Observations for Birds, Turtles, and Marine Mammals at the University of Maine Test Site near Monhegan, Maine.

American White Pelican Minnesota Conservation Summary

431 West 7th Avenue, Suite 101 Anchorage, AK Tel: September 2016

Scottish marine Special Protection Area network assessment

Recent Developments in NOAA s Real- Time Coastal Observing Systems for Safe and Efficient Maritime Transportation

Pigeon Guillemot Summary 2017

Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4

Minnesota Loon Monitoring Program

Transcription:

MLPA NCSR Baseline Seabird Nearshore Foraging and Feeding Flock Monitoring Protocol 2014-2015 Point Blue Conservation Science OVERVIEW This document provides instructions for collecting data within the North Coast Study Region of California s Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) for the following two parameters: Nearshore Foraging and Feeding Flocks. Both parameters are included in this one document because they are measured during the same survey. In this document, nearshore foraging is defined as foraging by individual animals in shallow subtidal habitats within 1 km of shore. Feeding flocks are considered large aggregations of animals (>5 individuals) foraging on a single source of pelagic prey and can occur anywhere within the view of the observer. Nearshore foraging and feeding flocks typically occur at different scales of effort, with nearshore foraging involving 1s to 10s of individuals, and feeding flocks involving 10s to 1000s of individuals. OBJECTIVES Nearshore Foraging I. To document and compare seabird and marine mammal foraging inside and outside Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) II. To determine if seabird and marine mammal foraging activity changes III. throughout the day and/or throughout the breeding season. To determine the role that oceanographic conditions (i.e., wave height, wind speed, water surface quality, and tidal height) play in regulating seabird and marine mammal foraging activity. Feeding Flocks I. To document the location, frequency of occurrence, longevity, and the species composition of feeding flocks in nearshore waters. II. III. IV. To determine how feeding flock location, frequency, longevity, and species composition vary spatially (between study sites, or within study sites between areas with different substrates, oceanography, currents, or levels of exposure to oceanic conditions) and temporally (diurnally, with different stages of breeding, and interannually), and reasons for this variation. To determine how oceanographic variables (e.g., sea surface temperature, wind speed, wave height) influence the number, size, and distribution of foraging flocks within and among years. To assess differences in seabird feeding within and outside MPAs.

METHODS Nearshore Foraging. We have selected multiple sites at each study area to conduct foraging surveys, with some sites within an dmpa and other sites outside of the MPA boundaries. For each location, we have defined an area of 1km radius within which foraging observations will be made. Sites included: Del Norte County (dn; Figure 1) 1. Crescent City area (cc) a. Pyramid Point SMCA (ppc; 41.957937-124.206524) b. Cresecnt City (ccx; 41.784693-124.254583) Humboldt County (hu; Figure 2) 1. Trinidad Head area (th) a. Patrick s Point (ppt; 41.138381-124.163344) b. Trinidad Bay (trb; 41.039516-124.121079) 2. Cape Mendocino area (cm) a. South Cape Mendocino SMR (cmr; 40.424051-124.402676) b. Devil s Gate (dga; 40.401796-124.382759) Mendocino County (me; Figure 3) 1. Kibesillah area (ki) a. Kibesillah (kib; 39.667193-123.791880) b. Ten Mile SMR (tmr; 39.568787-123.771078) 2. Mendocino Headlands area (mh) a. Point Cabrillo SMR (pcr; 39.348928-123.826976) b. Mendocino Headlands South (mhs; 39.304121-123.809423) Observations on seabird foraging activity will be made once a week at each site. Observations will be conducted during the following three-hour time intervals: 0700-1000 hrs., 1000-1300 hrs., 1300-1600 hrs., and 1600-1900 hrs. Each site should be surveyed once during one of the time intervals each week, then surveyed again the following week in the next time interval. Use the following table as an example of how to rotate the time intervals. Week Pyramid Point Crescent City Patrick s Point Trinidad Bay 1 0700-1000 1000-1300 1300-1600 1600-1900 2 1000-1300 1300-1600 1600-1900 0700-1000 3 1300-1600 1600-1900 0700-1000 1000-1300 4 1600-1900 0700-1000 1000-1300 0700-1000 5 0700-1000 1000-1300 1300-1600 1600-1900

etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. Observations during each three-hour time interval will be divided into 15-minute blocks. At the beginning of each 15-minute block, record surface water conditions and visibility. Observations are collected within the boundary of a 1-km radius circle that is centered on the observer s position. Reference maps will be provided that divide the circle into 200m-radius increments. Distances may appear different depending on the observer s height above sea level; landmarks on the maps can be used to determine distances on land to estimate distance at sea. All seabird and marine mammal species observed foraging should be recorded. We are particularly interested in observations of the following species foraging within each defined study area: Brandt s cormorant, pelagic cormorant, double-crested cormorant, brown pelican, western gull, California gull, pigeon guillemot, surf scoter, western grebe, Pacific loon, California sea lion, harbor seal, and sea otter. For each 15- minute block, record the maximum number of individuals of each species observed foraging within the defined study area. Record only seabirds and marine mammals that are actively foraging (i.e., actively diving/feeding) and not those that are only rafting or are in transit through the study area. If an individual seabird or marine mammal is observed foraging within a feeding flock (see below for definition of a feeding flock), DO NOT include it in the nearshore foraging data. Nearshore foraging includes only animals foraging independently. Transfer data from field notebooks to computer after each survey in case the field notebook is lost. Figure XX is an example of how to record data in the data book. Feeding Flocks. A feeding flock is defined as five or more seabirds and/or marine mammals feeding on the same prey patch (usually a school of fish, squid, etc.). Record all flocks visible from each of the foraging observation points, regardless of distance from the observation point. Give a general, descriptive location of the flock (e.g., approximately 500m southwest of the Crescent City OP). Mention any distinguishable landmarks in the description and draw a map in the notebook if necessary. Record the start and end time of the flock if it occurs during the three-hour study period. If the flock was already underway when you arrived at the study area and/or has not ended by the time you are finished with your survey, you will not have start and/or end times. Record the number of individuals of each species observed participating in the flock every 15 minutes. Record all species observed, but the species of interest are the same as for Nearshore Foraging observations above. Record multiple feeding flocks individually (e.g. FF#1, FF#2, etc.), whether they occur simultaneously or consecutively. Transfer data from field notebooks to computer after each survey in case the field notebook is lost. Figure XX is an example of how to record data in the data book.

Figure 1: Del Norte County (dn), Crescent City (cc) area nearshore foraging locations: Pyramid Point SMCA (ppc; left) and Crescent City (ccx; right).

Figure 2. Humboldt County (hu), Trinidad Head (th) area nearshore foraging locations: Patrick s Point (ppt; left) and Trinidad Bay (trb; right).

Figure 3. Humboldt County (hu), Cape Mendocino (cm) area nearshore foraging locations: South Cape Mendocino SMR (cmr; left) and Devil s Gate (dga; right).

Figure 4. Mendocino County (me), Kibesillah (ki) area nearshore foraging locations: Kibesillah (kib; left) and Ten Mile SMR (tmr; right).

Figure 5. Mendocino County (me), Mendocino Headlands (mh) area nearshore foraging locations: Point Cabrillo SMR (pcr; left) and Mendocino Headlands South (mhs; right).

Figure 6. Example of how nearshore foraging and feeding flock data are entered in the field data book.