Actually, you only need to design one monocular of the binocular.

Similar documents
Area of the Secondary Mirror Obscuration Ratio = Area of the EP Ignoring the Obscuration

OPTI-202R Geometrical and Instrumental Optics John E. Greivenkamp Final Exam Page 1/11 Spring 2017

Section 3. Imaging With A Thin Lens

OPTI-202R Geometrical and Instrumental Optics John E. Greivenkamp Midterm II Page 1/8 Spring 2017

Section 11. Vignetting

Phys 531 Lecture 9 30 September 2004 Ray Optics II. + 1 s i. = 1 f

General Physics II. Ray Optics

Algebra Based Physics. Reflection. Slide 1 / 66 Slide 2 / 66. Slide 3 / 66. Slide 4 / 66. Slide 5 / 66. Slide 6 / 66.

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

CHAPTER 1 Optical Aberrations

Magnification, stops, mirrors More geometric optics

Image Formation. Light from distant things. Geometrical optics. Pinhole camera. Chapter 36

Lens Design I Seminar 1

Opti 415/515. Introduction to Optical Systems. Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn

Algebra Based Physics. Reflection. Slide 1 / 66 Slide 2 / 66. Slide 3 / 66. Slide 4 / 66. Slide 5 / 66. Slide 6 / 66.

System/Prescription Data

Activity 6.1 Image Formation from Spherical Mirrors

GEOMETRICAL OPTICS Practical 1. Part I. BASIC ELEMENTS AND METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF OPTICAL SYSTEMS

PHYS 160 Astronomy. When analyzing light s behavior in a mirror or lens, it is helpful to use a technique called ray tracing.

Parity and Plane Mirrors. Invert Image flip about a horizontal line. Revert Image flip about a vertical line.

Chapter Ray and Wave Optics

Aberrations of a lens

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Sequential Ray Tracing. Lecture 2

Physics 142 Lenses and Mirrors Page 1. Lenses and Mirrors. Now for the sequence of events, in no particular order. Dan Rather

Mirrors, Lenses &Imaging Systems

Physics 197 Lab 7: Thin Lenses and Optics

Optical Design with Zemax for PhD - Basics

OPTICAL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES

PHYSICS 289 Experiment 8 Fall Geometric Optics II Thin Lenses

Applied Optics. , Physics Department (Room #36-401) , ,

OPTICAL IMAGING AND ABERRATIONS

Geometric optics & aberrations

OPTI-202R Geometrical and Instrumental Optics John E. Greivenkamp Midterm II Page 1/7 Spring 2018

28 Thin Lenses: Ray Tracing

Some lens design methods. Dave Shafer David Shafer Optical Design Fairfield, CT #

Ch 24. Geometric Optics

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

PHYS 1020 LAB 7: LENSES AND OPTICS. Pre-Lab

Tutorial Zemax Introduction 1

For rotationally symmetric optical

Optical Engineering 421/521 Sample Questions for Midterm 1

Compound Lens Example

25 cm. 60 cm. 50 cm. 40 cm.

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Lecture 4: Geometrical Optics 2. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Rays. Wavefronts. Aberrations. Outline

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Exam Preparation Guide Geometrical optics (TN3313)

2015 EdExcel A Level Physics EdExcel A Level Physics. Lenses

Will contain image distance after raytrace Will contain image height after raytrace

always positive for virtual image

Optics Practice. Version #: 0. Name: Date: 07/01/2010

Chapter 34. Images. Copyright 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.

Lab 11: Lenses and Ray Tracing

Lens Design I. Lecture 5: Advanced handling I Herbert Gross. Summer term

Department of Physics & Astronomy Undergraduate Labs. Thin Lenses

Elementary Optical Systems. Section 13. Magnifiers and Telescopes

Chapter 34 Geometric Optics (also known as Ray Optics) by C.-R. Hu

PHYSICS FOR THE IB DIPLOMA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Fundamental Paraxial Equation for Thin Lenses

Chapter 23. Mirrors and Lenses

Chapter 23. Light Geometric Optics

Lab 2 Geometrical Optics

2.71 Optics Fall 05 QUIZ 1 Wednesday, Oct. 12, 2005

The optical analysis of the proposed Schmidt camera design.

30 Lenses. Lenses change the paths of light.

TOPICS Recap of PHYS110-1 lecture Physical Optics - 4 lectures EM spectrum and colour Light sources Interference and diffraction Polarization

ptical Short Course International

Lecture 17. Image formation Ray tracing Calculation. Lenses Convex Concave. Mirrors Convex Concave. Optical instruments

Converging Lenses. Parallel rays are brought to a focus by a converging lens (one that is thicker in the center than it is at the edge).

Optical Design with Zemax for PhD

E X P E R I M E N T 12

Tangents. The f-stops here. Shedding some light on the f-number. by Marcus R. Hatch and David E. Stoltzmann

PHY170: OPTICS. Things to do in the lab INTRODUCTORY REMARKS OPTICS SIMULATIONS

Introduction. Related Work

FIELD LENS -EYE LENS VEYE

Chapter 29/30. Wave Fronts and Rays. Refraction of Sound. Dispersion in a Prism. Index of Refraction. Refraction and Lenses

Chapter 3. Introduction to Zemax. 3.1 Introduction. 3.2 Zemax

Chapter 3 Op+cal Instrumenta+on

Astronomy 80 B: Light. Lecture 9: curved mirrors, lenses, aberrations 29 April 2003 Jerry Nelson


Chapter 2 - Geometric Optics

R 1 R 2 R 3. t 1 t 2. n 1 n 2

AP Physics Problems -- Waves and Light

Spherical Mirrors. Concave Mirror, Notation. Spherical Aberration. Image Formed by a Concave Mirror. Image Formed by a Concave Mirror 4/11/2014

PHY385H1F Introductory Optics Term Test 2 November 6, 2012 Duration: 50 minutes. NAME: Student Number:.

Basic Optics System OS-8515C

Lens Principal and Nodal Points

Final Reg Optics Review SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2008

Lab 10: Lenses & Telescopes

Introduction. Geometrical Optics. Milton Katz State University of New York. VfeWorld Scientific New Jersey London Sine Singapore Hong Kong

ME 297 L4-2 Optical design flow Analysis

Big League Cryogenics and Vacuum The LHC at CERN

Some of the important topics needed to be addressed in a successful lens design project (R.R. Shannon: The Art and Science of Optical Design)

Tutorial Zemax 8: Correction II

Laboratory experiment aberrations

LEICA Summarit-S 70 mm ASPH. f/2.5 / CS

Practice Problems (Geometrical Optics)

Transcription:

orro rism Binoculars Design a pair of 8X40 binoculars: Actually, you only need to design one monocular of the binocular. Specifications: Objective ocal Length = 200 mm Eye Relief = 15 mm The system stop is at the objective. A field lens is placed at the intermediate image plane. A orro rism System is used for image erection. The index of refraction of the prisms is 1.517, and both orro prisms that make up the orro system must be the same size. or mechanical mounting reasons, none of the optics of the binoculars may be inside the mechanical volume of the orro system. The mechanical volume of the orro system is the smallest rectangular volume that will contain the prism system. The length of this volume is defined by the dihedral lines of the two component orro prisms. The defining dimension of the orro system is the entrance face size. The entrance face of one of the orro prisms is x. The cross section of each orro prism is shown. 2 Note: This is a first-order design problem. All lenses can be assumed to be thin lenses in air with no aberrations and no thickness. Similarly, mirrors have radii of curvature but no sag. To aid in grading, this problem may be more completely specified than you would normally encounter. In fact, the approach specified may or may not be the best form of the solution. All of the given specifications must be met exactly. 1

Section A Determine the required orro prism system size that produces an unvignetted full field of view of +/- 2.0 degrees. The orro prism system must be as small as possible. Determine: rism Size (Minimum) Section B Using the orro prism from Section A, complete the design to provide the largest possible half-vignetted ield of View. Determine the following: Half-Vignetted OV Eye Lens ocal Length ield Lens ocal Length Objective Lens Diameter Eye Lens Diameter ield Lens Diameter Objective Lens to rism Entrance ace Distance Overall Mechanical System Length* OV HAL f E f D O D E D t L *The mechanical system length is the distance between the objective lens and the eye lens (measured parallel to the optical axis) of the binocular system. Section C Redesign the 8X40 binoculars to have the largest possible half-vignetted field of view. Use the same initial specifications for the objective and the stop and field lens locations. Determine the following: rism Size Half-Vignetted OV Eye Lens ocal Length ield Lens ocal Length Objective Lens Diameter Eye Lens Diameter ield Lens Diameter Objective Lens to rism Entrance ace Distance Overall Mechanical System Length OV HAL f E f D O D E D t L 2

orro rism Binoculars - Solutions Sections A and B rism Size = 26.56 mm Half-Vignetted ield of View OV HAL = +/- 4.38 degrees Eye Lens ocal Length f E = 25.0 mm ield Lens ocal Length f = 47.62 mm Objective Lens Diameter D O = 40.0 mm Eye Lens Diameter D E = 23.4 mm ield Lens Diameter D = 30.6 mm Objective Lens to rism Entrance ace t = 103.40 mm Overall Mechanical System Length L = 154.96 mm Section C rism Size = 43.13 mm* Half-Vignetted ield of View OV HAL = +/- 7.83 degrees Eye Lens ocal Length f E = 25.0 mm ield Lens ocal Length f = 47.62 mm Objective Lens Diameter D O = 40.0 mm Eye Lens Diameter D E = 38.0 mm ield Lens Diameter D = 55.0 mm Objective Lens to rism Entrance ace t = 43.13 mm* Overall Mechanical System Length L = 111.26 mm* * Additional solutions exist 3

The first step in the solution is to solve for the design of the base Keplerian telescope that is common to all parts of the problem. M = -8 Objective: f O = 200 mm Stop at the Objective D O = 40 mm f Eye Lens: f E = 25 mm O M 8 fe The field lens is at the front focal point of the eye lens: f f EYE X E z d ER z X f E f O z STO z f f 225mm STO O E 1 1 1 zx 28.125mm z z f X STO E ER 15mm z d d13.125 X d 13.125 t E E t fe E f d 13.125 f 2 E ield Lens: f = 47.62 mm 4

Now examine the orro prism system: The tunnel diagram and the reduced tunnel diagram are rism #1 rism #2 Entrance ace 4 Exit ace 4 /n 2 Because of the dihedral line locations of the two component prisms in the orro prism system, the length of the mechanical volume of the oro prism system is 2. The entrance and exit faces of the orro system are co-planar. To prevent mechanical mounting issues (and to satisfy the resulting requirement that no lens elements be within the mechanical volume of the orro system), the minimum spacing between a lens element and either the entrance or exit face of the orro system is. 5

art A Determine the minimum prism size for an unvignetted OV of +/- 2 degrees. HOV 2deg Chief Ray : u tan HOV 0.035 Look at the marginal and chief rays to determine the ray bundle lime for no vignetting: Ray Bundle Limit y y This can be evaluated at and axial position between the objective lens and field lens to determine the required prism aperture size. Ray Bundle Limit: y y f O f u The orro prism system should be placed as close to the field lens as possible to minimize its size. The exit face of the prism system will be from the field lens. The prism must be sized as to not vignette. The unvignetted OV is limited by the aperture size at the entrance face of the orro system. 6

Using the reduced tunnel diagram: Ray Bundle Limit: y y f O /2 u f t 4 /n z f O Using the distance z as the distance from the objective lens y uz u y O O O u D /2 /f O y D /2 D /2 z/f O O O or no vignetting, the required minimum prism aperture radius at a specific z is then a D /2 y y uz D /2 D /2 z/f O O O D / 2 20mm 0.065z This is the ray bundle limit. 7

or a given, the front face of the prism system is located at z t f 4D / n D n 1.517 O z t 200mm 3.637D Using this position in the equation for the required apertures size allows for the determination of the minimum prism size: D / 2 20mm 0.065 200mm 3.637D D 26.56mm And the lengths of the tunnel diagrams are 4D 106.24mm 4D / n 70.03mm The distance form the objective to the entrance face is then t fo 4 / n D 103.41mm And because the entrance and exit faces of the orro prism system are coplanar, the total length of the binoculars is L t D f 154.96mm E t Mechanical Volume f O f f E L f E The second prism is actually rotated 90 deg out of the plane of the paper. 8

art B Determine the resulting half-vignetted OV The half-vignetted OV is determined by the maximum chief ray angle that is passed through the system by the orro prism system. A quick examination of the diagram in part A (with the chief ray and the reduced tunnel diagram) shows that the exit face of the orro system will limit the half-vignetted OV. At this location and condition, the chief ray height will equal the prism size: yd /2uz zf D O 26.56mm / 2 u 200mm 26.56mm u 0.07657 1 HOV tan u 4.38deg OV / 4.38deg The required field lens and eye lens diameters are determined by tracing this chief ray through the system (raytrace attached): ield Lens: y 15.314mm y 0 a y 15.314mm D 30.6mm Eye Lens: ye 9.188mm ye 2.5mm The simple solution for the diameter of the eye lens needed to support this half vignetted OV is to use twice the chief ray height at the eye lens (D E = 18.4 mm), but this diameter will actually totally vignette the OV. A closer examination of the off axis ray bundle in the vicinity of the field and eye lenses is needed. 9

Exit End of the orro rism System f f E X The dashed ray is the ray from the bottom of the objective lens. Note that to the left of the field lens this ray is below the chief ray. To the right of the field lens, this ray is now above the chief ray. If the eye lens radius was chosen to be equal to the chief ray height, this ray would be blocked and no light from that OV would make it through the X and the system. The eye lens diameter must be chosen according to the conditions for no vignetting. Eye Lens: y 9.188mm y 2.5mm E E E E E E a y y 11.69mm D 23.4mm The eye lens diameter must also support the 2 degree unvignetted OV. or this 2 degree chief ray, the chief ray height at the eye lens is 4.20 mm (see raytrace), and the required lens diameter would be 2(4.20 mm + 2.5 mm) = 13.4 mm. This value is less than what is already specified by the larger half-vignetted OV. Because the eye lens diameter was actually specified as that needed for no vignetting, this last check is actually unnecessary. 10

This design was analyzed with commercial lens design software to see the actual raypaths and the vigneting limits. 2 degree unvignetted OV Note that the ray bundle is limited by the entrance face of the orro prism system. 4.38 degree half-vignetted OV the chief ray is limited by the exit face of the orro prism system. The amount of vignetting that occurs at the entrance face of the prism system is relatively small (much less than 50%). The system designed here is fairly representative of what is found in commercial binoculars. The unvignetted OV is relatively small and is limited by the size of the entrance face of the prism. Larger OVs are partially vignetted, but the vignetting grows slowly because the entrance face is optically about halfway between the objective lens and the field lens. Eventually the exit face of the prism begins to vignette the off-axis OV, and this vignetting proceeds quickly with OV as the exit face is close to the intermediate image plane. In practice, a field stop is often used to limit the OV to a value somewhat less than the half-vignetted OV supported by the prism. A uniform brightness across the OV is desired. There is not a large difference between the halfvignetted OV and the OV of the field stop. One small detail that has been ignored in this solution is the physical relationship between the two orro prisms in the orro system. Remember that the second prism is physically in front of the first prism. The side of this second prism extends straight forward at the edge of the prism aperture and can slightly clip one side of the beam Clipping Unvignetted Ray Bundle orro #2 orro #1 from one side of the unvignetted OV. The effect is small and could be prevented by using larger prisms or reducing the aperture used for a given size prism. The chief ray defining the half-vignetted OV is similarly clipped by the first prism beyond the exit face of the second prism. 11

12

art C Redesign the system for the largest possible half-vignetted OV. The largest OV will be obtained by making the prism as large as possible subject to the mechanical constraints of the mechanical volume of the prism. The objective lensentrance face separation as well as the exit face-field lens separation will be equal to the prism size. f O f /2 u 4 /n f O f 200mm 2D 4D / n n 1.517 O D 43.13mm Because the entrance and exit faces are coplanar, the actual system length is L 2D f 111.26mm E The reduced tunnel diagram length is 4D / n 113.72mm The half vignetted OV can be determined from the chief ray: D /2 21.56mm u 0.1374 fo D 156.87mm 1 HOV tan u 7.83deg OV / 7.83deg 13

As in art B, the lens diameters are determined by raytrace analysis: ield Lens: y 27.48mm y 0 a y 27.48mm D 55.0mm Eye Lens: y 16.49mm y 2.5mm E E E E E E a y y 18.99mm D 38.0mm Both of these lenses are too fast for this to be a practical system. In addition the very large prisms would be excessively heavy. An optical design software representation of this system: By using the largest possible prism, not only is the maximum half-vignetted OV obtained, but the maximum unvignetted OV also results. However, many other prism sizes will produce the same half-vignetted OV. The prism must be placed as close to the objective lens as possible (t = ). The chief ray is limited by the upper rear corner of the prism, and the chief ray angle can be then written as D /2 0.5 u 0.1374 D 4D /n 3.637 1 HOV tan u 7.83deg This result is independent of. The prism can be scaled to the chief ray height while maintaining the minimum separation of from the objective. 14

f O f /2 u 4 /n 4 /n The smallest possible prism occurs when the entrance face size matches the marginal ray height. Any smaller prism would result in the entrance face of the prism becoming the stop of the system and reducing the E size. Using z as the distance from the objective lens, the marginal ray height is y D /2 uz O u D /2 /f O y D / 2 D / 2 z / f 20mm 0.1z O O O At the minimum prism size, zd yd /2 O D /220mm0.1D D 33.33mm t 33.33mm 15

The distance from the prism exit face to the field lens and the overall system length are then tf D 4D / n 78.8mm 0 L D tf 137.1mm E Because the chief ray and marginal rays have not changed, the required field lens and eye lens diameters have not changed from the previous configuration. The optical design layout of this system is shown: Note that the marginal ray is just passed by the prism system. This configuration has no unvignetted OV (is unvignetted only on axis). Both of these maximum half-vignetted OV configurations have the dihedral line of the second orro prism of the orro prism system in the plane of the objective lens. In the minimum prism size configuration, the orro prism aperture is less than the aperture size of the objective lens or stop, and the second orro prism will block a portion of the objective lens. The E will be clipped on one side and no longer be round. To avoid this clipping, a better minimum prism size would be to match the prism size to the objective lens diameter ( = D O = 40 mm). This clipping does not occur with the maximum-size orro prism system as its aperture is larger than the objective lens. 16

17