Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Similar documents
Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Muswellbrook Coal Company

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

Roche Ireland Limited

Muswellbrook Coal Company

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

Roche Ireland Limited

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire

Liddell Coal Operations

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Offaly County Council

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

Public Hearing on Revisions to Lincoln County Zoning Ordinance

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 11 August Doc no QM-RP-1-0

Technical Report Noise and Vibration

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Noise Certification Workshop

Southwest Anthony Henday Drive At Wedgewood Heights Residential Neighborhood in Edmonton, AB

South Orange County Reliability Enhancement Project

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

January 15, File: A. Urban Systems Ltd Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9. Attention: Tim Stevens. Dear Tim:

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

McGill Environmental Ltd.

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring. and Compliance Assessment September Report Number Q R2.

Duralie Coal Mine. Quarterly Compliance Noise Monitoring. November Report Number R December 2016.

Liddell Coal Operations

November 12, Mr. Bryan Tripp Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc. 34 Harvard Road Guelph, ON N1G 4V8

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Noise results for PF Formation- September 2017

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

City and Borough of Juneau

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER 48 NOISE POLLUTION

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Liddell Coal Operations

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

Anchorage Port Modernization Program In air Noise and Ground borne Vibration Analysis Monitoring Report

91 Street Earth Berm Removal in Edmonton, Alberta

THE ATTENUATION OF NOISE ENTERING BUILDINGS USING QUARTER- WAVE RESONATORS: RESULTS FROM A FULL SCALE PROTOTYPE. C.D.Field and F.R.

Environmental Noise Assessment Pa ia Relief Route Project Pa ia, Maui County, Hawaii

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Compliance Noise Survey & Assessment

Muswellbrook Coal Company

A Brief Review Of The Hoosac Wind Turbine Noise Studies

Noise Impact Analysis

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING QUARTER 1, Northparkes Mines PO Box 995 Parkes NSW 2870

06/25/13 CUP prepared for: June 20, prepared by: Earl Mullins, PE. architectural environmental and industrial noise control

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

CALGA SAND QUARRY ATTENDED COMPLIANCE NOISE MONITORING 12 APRIL 2017 REPORT NO E VERSION A APRIL 2017 PREPARED FOR

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF APRIL 29, 2013 MAY 05, 2013)

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Preliminary Results of Noise Monitoring in 1995 in Bryce Canyon National Park

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF NOVEMBER 25, 2013 DECEMBER 01, 2013)

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels 1

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring August Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

January 7, Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

Raging River Quarry. Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016

Please refer to the figure on the following page which shows the relationship between sound fields.

MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF AIRCRAFT NOISE IN AN AIRPORT S NEIGHBORHOOD. M. K. Law, 1 and K. M. Li 2

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring and Compliance Assessment. September Report Number

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING JULY 2013

Background Noise Survey Report SANTA ISABEL WIND FARM PROJECT

Measuring procedures for the environmental parameters: Acoustic comfort

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JUNE 30, 2014 JULY 06, 2014)

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Cullen Valley Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, Prepared for Castlereagh Coal

Soltec (Ireland) Limited Mullingar Business Park, Mullingar, Co Westmeath. Annual Noise Report

Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian Pump Stations

NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS

Transcription:

Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3) APPENDIX J: Tintina Montana, Inc. July 17

MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7, 13 TO: FROM: RE: Allan Kirk / Geomin Resources Bob Jacko / Tintina Resources Sean Connolly BSA Project #134 1.0 INTRODUCTION On September 10 and 11, 13, (BSA) completed baseline noise level measurements for the Black Butte Copper project. The ambient daytime and nighttime noise level measurements were completed at four locations indicated on Figure 1, and were intended to document the existing background noise levels, prior to mining operations. A 24-hour noise level measurement was completed at Location 1. One 1-hour daytime (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.) noise level measurement and one 15-minute nighttime (7 p.m. to 7 a.m.) noise level measurement were completed at Locations 2 through 4. This memo documents the results of the baseline noise level measurements. 2.0 NOISE TERMINOLOGY For environmental noise studies, noise levels are typically described using A-weighted equivalent noise levels, L eq, during a certain time period. The L eq metric is useful because it uses a single number, similar to an average, to describe the constantly fluctuating instantaneous ambient noise levels at a receptor location during a period of time, and accounts for all of the noises and quiet periods that occur during that time period. The 90 th percentile-exceeded noise level, L 90, is a metric that indicates the single noise level that is exceeded during 90% of a measurement period, although the actual instantaneous noise levels fluctuate continuously. The L 90 noise level helps quantify the acoustical character of an environment, such as rural area, urban area, or noisy neighborhood because it represents the residual (i.e., ambient) noise between individual noise events, such as a vehicle pass-by or aircraft over flight. The L 90 noise level is often near the low end of the instantaneous noise levels during a measurement period. Brief, intermittent and loud sources, such as an aircraft flyover, car doors Page 1 of 8

closing, bird chirps, dog barks, car horns, vehicle pass-by, etc., will influence the L eq of the measurement period but typically not the L 90, even though these other noise sources may be briefly audible and louder than the a noise source of interest during the same measurement period. If a person was only listening to one continuously operating noise source, such as a large fan, the L eq and L 90 noise levels at that location would be approximately equal. L min is a metric that indicates the minimum instantaneous noise level recorded by the sound level meter during the measurement period. The L max metric denotes the maximum instantaneous noise level recorded during the measurement period. 3.0 NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Noise level measurements were conducted by BSA in general accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S.18-1994, Procedures for Outdoor Measurement of Sound Pressure Level (ANSI 1994). BSA conducted the noise level measurements using Larson Davis Model 831 and CEL 593 Type I Sound Level Meters with preamplifiers, and 0.5-inch diameter microphone. The meters were calibrated prior to and after each measurement period using a CEL Instruments Model 284/2 Acoustical Calibrator. The sound level meters were set to fast response. Windscreens were used over the microphones, and the microphones were approximately 5 feet above the ground surface at each measurement location. Weather data during the noise level measurements were recorded at Tintina Resource s onsite Core Shed weather station and are included as Attachment A. Location 1 Bar Z Ranch The 24-hour measurement Location 1 is approximately 0.5 miles north of the Portal on the Bar Z Ranch property, northwest of the intersection of Forest Road 119 (FR119) (a.k.a. Sheep Creek Road) and the Holcim Haul Road (a.k.a. Butte Creek Road) (Figure 1, attached), as shown in the following picture. Measurement Location 1 Looking northwest at Bar Z Ranch lodge/residence. Page 2 of 8

The long-term noise level measurement at Location 1 was completed from 1 hours on Tuesday, September 10 th to 1 hours on Wednesday, September 11 th, to document the ambient noise level conditions at the lodge/residence. Vehicles on FR119 passed by Location 1 during the measurement period, including Holcim haul trucks, passenger cars, trucks and trailers, and ATVs. The noise levels were measured in 1-minute and 1-hour increments during the measurement period, and the sound level meter recorded audio clips during high noise events. BSA analyzed the audio files to relate vehicle noise source to a recorded noise level at the residence. In general, the dominant L max noise sources included vehicles and haul trucks passing by on FR119 and overhead aircraft. The results of the ambient noise level measurements at Location 1 are summarized in Graph 3-1. The L eq ranged from 22 to 48 dba and L 90 ranged from 19 to 29 dba, which are typical noise levels for sparsely-populated rural areas (Harris 1998). The average measured L eq and L 90 frequency spectrum for each measurement period is shown on Figure 2 (attached). Page 3 of 8

Graph 3-1: Location 1 Ambient Noise Levels September 10 11, 13 Page 4 of 8

Location 2 Castle Mountain Ranch/U.S. 89 Measurement Location 2 is approximately 2 miles east of the site, on the west side of the U.S. 89 curve (that turns east) and north of the intersection with FR119 (Figure 1), as shown in the following picture. Measurement Location 2 Looking east at U.S.89 The results of the ambient noise level measurements at Location 2 are summarized in Table 1, and the measured L eq and L 90 frequency spectrum for each measurement period is shown on Figure 3 (attached). In general, the dominant noise source was traffic on U.S. 89. The measured L eq and L 90 noise levels are typical for traffic noise in rural areas (Harris 1998). Table 1: Ambient Noise Levels (dba) at Location 2 Castle Mountain Ranch/U.S. 89 Date 9/11/13 9/10/13 Time (hours) L eq L 90 Notes Daytime 0954 1054 Nighttime 2217 22 44 24 41 26 Dominant noise sources included vehicles on U.S. 89 and an overhead helicopter. Other noise sources included birds, cows, insects, water in creek, commercial aircraft in distance and haul trucks on FR119 turning south on U.S. 89. Dominant noise sources were cars passing by on U.S. 89. Other noise sources included flowing water in creek and breeze in trees (faint). Page 5 of 8

Location 3 Butte Creek Road Gate Measurement Location 3 is approximately 2 miles west of the Portal and 2.4 miles southwest of the site FR119/Butte Creek Road intersection at the road gate (Figure 1), as shown in the following picture. Measurement Location 3 Looking west at the locked gate on Butte Creek Road. The results of the ambient noise level measurements at Location 3 are summarized in Table 2, and the average measured L eq and L 90 frequency spectrum for each measurement period is shown on Figure 4 (attached). In general, the daytime the dominant noise source was traffic, including haul trucks, on Butte Creek Road. The measured L eq and L 90 noise levels are typical for sparselypopulated rural areas (Harris 1998). Measurement Location 3 Looking south at a haul truck on Butte Creek Road. Page 6 of 8

Table 2: Average Ambient Noise Levels (dba) at Location 3 Butte Creek Road Gate Date 9/11/13 9/10/13 Time (hours) L eq L 90 Notes Daytime 0822 0923 Nighttime 2244 2310 33 22 Dominant noise sources included a haul truck, a pickup truck and ATV s on Butte Creek Road. Other noise sources included birds, cows, faint breeze though grass, and a propeller plane in distance. 24 21 Noise sources included breeze through grass and insects (faint). Location 4 Strawberry Butte Measurement Location 4 is approximately 0.6 miles northeast of the Portal and 0.5 miles east of the site FR119/Butte Creek Road intersection (Figure 1), and south of the house being constructed on the north side of Strawberry Butte, as shown in the following picture. Measurement Location 4 Looking south at the residence being constructed on Strawberry Butte. The results of the ambient noise level measurements at Location 4 are summarized in Table 3, and the average measured L eq and L 90 frequency spectrum for each measurement period is shown on Figure 5 (attached). In general, the daytime the dominant noise sources were construction activities. The measured L eq and L 90 noise levels are typical for sparsely-populated rural areas (Harris 1998). Page 7 of 8

Table 3: Average Ambient Noise Levels (dba) at Location 4 Strawberry Butte Date 9/11/13 9/10/13 Time (hours) L eq L 90 Notes Daytime 0705 04 Nighttime 28 2343 28 23 Dominant noise sources included construction vehicles and hammering. Other noise sources included vehicles on FR119 and U.S.89, cows, water in Sheep Creek, and a commercial plane in distance. 24 22 Sheep Creek water flowing below (barely audible). 4.0 REFERENCES American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1994. S.18-1994, Procedures for Outdoor Measurement of Sound Pressure Level. Harris, C., ed. 1998. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, 3 rd edition. Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, New York. Page 8 of 8

FR 11 9 Vent Raise (typ.) Location 1 Bar Z Ranch Location 4 Lodge at Sheep Creek Castle Mountain Ranch Construction Access Road Stock Pile Location 3 Butte Creek Rd gate Process Water Pond (PWP) line Dec Waste Rock Storage Stock Pile Mill Pad Location 2 Portal Contact Water Pond (CWP) Operation Access Road Portal Pad FR 119 Stock Pile Stock Pile Stock Pile US 89 Butte Creek Road C T em Fa aili en cil ng t ity s (C TF ) Temporary Construction Stock Pile Non-Contact Water Reservoir (NCWR) Noise measurement location Residence Mine Permit Boundary FIGURE 1 Project Facilities and Noise Measurement Locations Scale: 1 mm = m (8.5"x11")

Vehicle engines Tires on road L eq Spectra Day-Average Night-Average L 90 Spectra Day-Average Night-Average FIGURE 2 Baseline Ambient Noise Measurements: Location 1 Frequency Spectra Bar Z Ranch

Truck & car engines Tires on road L eq Spectra Day: 9/11/13, 0954-1054 Night: 9/10/13, 2217-22 Flowing water in creek L 90 Spectra Day: 9/11/13, 0954-1054 Night: 9/10/13, 2217-22 FIGURE 3 Baseline Ambient Noise Measurements: Location 2 Frequency Spectra Castle Mountain Ranch/U.S. 89

Pickup truck L eq Spectra Cows Insects Day: 9/11/13, 0822-0923 Night: 9/10/13, 25-2310 L 90 Spectra Day: 9/11/13, 0822-0923 Night: 9/10/13, 25-2310 FIGURE 4 Baseline Ambient Noise Measurements: Location 3 Frequency Spectra Butte Creek Road Gate

Vehicle engines L eq Spectra Flowing water in Sheep Creek Unknown (inaudible) Day: 9/11/13, 0705-04 Night: 9/10/13, 28-2343 L 90 Spectra Flowing water in Sheep Creek Day: 9/11/13, 0705-04 Night: 9/10/13, 28-2343 FIGURE 5 Baseline Ambient Noise Measurements: Location 4 Frequency Spectra Strawberry Butte