TEST REPORT. Test Report No. : UL-RPT-RP JD02A V3.0. Date of Issue: 06 October 2017

Similar documents
TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

Test. Report. Manufacturer. Model No. FCC ID. Technology. and. 1. This. 3. This. pp John Newell. as UL. Date of Issue: 28 May 2013.

TEST REPORT. Test Report No. : UL-RPT-RP JD03A V3.0. Date of Issue: 14 September pp John Newell Quality Manager, UL VS LTD

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

Test. Report. : connectblue. Manufacturer. Model No. FCC ID 4.10, This. 3. This. as UL. Date of Issue: 22 May

TEST REPORT. Test Report No. : UL-RPT-RP JD07H V2.0. Test Standard(s) : FCC Parts , , (a) &

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

EMC Test Report. Tested by: Jeremy O. Pickens, Senior EMC Engineer. Reviewed by: David Schramm, EMC/RF/SAR/HAC Manager

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

Chapter I - Federal Communications Commission Subchapter A - General Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices Subpart C - Intentional Radiators

FCC CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT

Table of Contents 1. GENERAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSIONS TEST RADIATED EMISSION TEST...

TEST REPORT. Issued for: ShenZhen MYGT Co.,LTD D3 Tongfuyu Industrial Area Community of Shajing Town, Baoan, Shenzhen, China.

FCC ID: B4OCC264BPA-S

FCC Report for Parts ,

FCC 47 CFR PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-210 ISSUE 8 BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. 2.4GHz LE MODULE MODEL NUMBER: RN4020

TEST REPORT. Issued for:

FCC Test Report. : Wireless Way Richmond, BC, V6V 3A4 Canada : 47 CFR FCC Part 27 Subpart L

FCC PART TEST REPORT. Weccan Industrial Limited

TEST REPORT. Issued for: RUIMA INTERNATIONAL(HK)INDUSTRIAL CO.,LIMITED NO.19 Ruixiang Road, Xinhua Industrial Zone, Huadu District, Guangzhou China

F2 Labs Peters Road Middlefield, Ohio United States of America

Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization of the SMK Electronics Corp. RC04 RF Remote Control

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

TRANSMITTER MODEL: KAS-2030M

FCC 47 CFR PART 15 SUBPART C CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. Bluetooth Remote Control for Video Set Top Box MODEL NUMBER: IPRC1000 FCC ID: 2ABTE-L3YJC9

TEST REPORT. Issued for: Marvelmind Robotics Lugovaya str., 4 bld 5 room 17, Skolkovo Innovation Center, Moscow, , Russian Federation

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-247 ISSUE 1 BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR

Title: Test on 5.8 GHz Band Outdoor WiFi (802.11b/g) Wireless Base Station

FCC C2PC Test Report

Page 1 of 51 Report No.: T TEST REPORT FCC ID: 2AGJ5WAP-30. In Accordance with: FCC PART 15, SUBPART C : 2015 (Section 15.

XBee Series 2 OEM RF Module Model No.: XBEE2 FCC ID: OUR-XBEE2. Applicant: MaxStream, Inc. 355 South 520 West Suite 180 Lindon, UT 84042

Report Number : F690501/RF-RTL Page: 2 of 62

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION On Behalf of Futaba Corporation Radio Control Model No.:T10CG-2.4G FCC ID:AZPT10CG-24G Brand : Futaba

Test Report. ASSA ABLOY Hospitality AS Anolitveien 1-3, 1400 Ski, Norway. ASSA ABLOY Hospitality AS Anolitveien 1-3, 1400 Ski, Norway

Version HCT CO.,LTD. TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION. HCT-R-1709-F013 September 28, First Approval Report. F-TP22-03 (Rev.

TEST REPORT. Issued for: TICATAG 4 rue Louis de Broglie LANNION FRANCE. Issued By:

Revision history. Revision Date of issue Test report No. Description KES-RF-14T0042 Initial

TEST REPORT. For RFID READER/WRITER. In conformity with. FCC CFR 47 Part15 Subpart C

OUTDOOR SOUND MODULE/TRANSMITTER MODEL: THE BANDIT

IC Test Report. : 3147A-BT900US : Intelligent BT4.0 Dual Mode USB Dongle

TEST REPORT : 2AIB7MGS. TEST DATE : to

1/41 IC: 109U-89FT7100

TEST REPORT. Test Report No. : UL-RPT-RP JD06C V2.0. Customer : Apple Inc. Model No. : A1842 FCC ID : BCGA1842

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-GEN AND RSS-210 CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR BROADCOM BLUETOOTH MODULE MODEL NUMBER: BCM92046MD

TRFWL. Autostart Inc Rue Paré Mont-Royal, Québec Canada, H4P 2M2 EZSNAH2503

Report On. Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization of the Hunter Douglas Window Fashions PV HUB Bluetooth Window Blind Remote Control

Test Report. Bluetooth Transceiver in UPCS Base Station. Panasonic Corporation of North America

Report On. FCC and Industry Canada Testing of the Inmarsat Global Ltd IsatPhone Pro GMR2+ Satellite Phone COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE

FCC Test Report. Report No.: PTCDQ FC01

FCC PART TEST REPORT. Zhejiang Flashforge 3D Technology CO., Ltd

IC Test Report. : 3147A-BT800 : BTv4.0 Dual Mode USB HCI Module : BT800 refer to item for more details

FCC AND IC CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT

Medtronic MiniMed TEST REPORT FOR. GST3 Glucose Sensor Transmitter, MMT-7763A. Tested To The Following Standards:

For. Tzone FCC ID: FCC Part Description: Product TZ-BT04. Report to Tested By: Manager STR I

REPORT REVISION HISTORY...

FCC PART 15C TEST REPORT FOR CERTIFICATION On Behalf of. Sony Corporation. Wireless Speaker SRS-XB10 FCC ID: AK8SRSXB10

IC Test Report. : 3147A-BT850 : Bluetooth 4.2 Dual Mode USB HCI Module (Refer to item for more details) (Refer to item for more details)

F2 Labs Peters Road Middlefield, Ohio United States of America

TEST REPORT FCC ID: 2ADMF-HC06. : bluetooth module keyes HC-06, keyes hc-05, FUNDUINO HC-06, FUNDUINO hc-05

TEST REPORT. Reference No... : WTS16S E FCC ID... : SJ8-UDR777HD. Applicant... : RDI Technology Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION... 4

FCC CFR47 Part 15 Subpart C IC RSS-247 Certification Test Report

INDEX. Table of contents. 1. General information

ELECTRICAL TESTING ACCORDING TO: FCC 47CFR part 15 subpart C (DTS) and subpart B FOR:

Report No.: HCT-R-1507-F015-2 Model: SW100 Page 2 of 52. Version TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION

Channel 01 (2422MHz)

Table of Contents 1. GENERAL INFORMATION SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSIONS TEST... 12

FCC REPORT. 570 E1 Camino Real #200, Redwood City, CA 94063, United Manufacturer:

FCC TEST REPORT. ADDRESS: #2 Creation Rd. 4, Science-Based Ind. Park Hsinchu Taiwan, R.O.C.

FCC PART 95 MEASUREMENT AND TEST REPORT. Powerwerx, Inc.

Certification Test Report

FCC PART 15C TEST REPORT FOR CERTIFICATION On Behalf of. DEI Sales Inc. dba Definitive Technology. Model Number: STUDIO SLIM SUBWOOFER

EXHIBIT 7: MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES Pursuant 47 CFR 2.947

FCC ID: 2ALT5-GW6088

FCC PART 15C TEST REPORT FOR CERTIFICATION On Behalf of. Sony Corporation. Home Audio System GTK-XB90 FCC ID: AK8GTKXB90

FCC 15B Test Report. : BTv4.0 Dual Mode USB Dongle. Address : Thompson Ave. / Lenexa, Kansas / / USA

FCC Test Report. Wayne Hsu / Assistant Manager

STC Test Report. Date : Page 1 of 13 No. : HM161169

Test Report Version. Test Report No. Date Description. DRTFCC Sep. 12, 2014 Initial issue

TEST REPORT. Report Number: MPK-004 Project Numbers: G , G July 13, 2017

As the responsible EMC Engineer, I hereby declare that the equipment tested as specified in this report conforms to the requirements indicated.

FCC REPORT. Dongguan Hele Electronics Co.,Ltd. * In the configuration tested, the EUT complied with the standards specified above.

ROKU REMOTE MODEL: RC07

SHENZHEN LCS COMPLIANCE TESTING LABORATORY LTD. FCC ID: 2ADPC-G6 Report No.: LCS E

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-210 ISSUE 7 CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR g WIRELESS LAN + BLUETOOTH PCI-E MINI CARD

TEST REPORT. Shenzhen, PRC.

FCC 47 CFR PART 15 SUBPART C CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. RF ID Reader MODEL NUMBER: A-405 FCC ID: WFQITCS-A-405 IC: 10717A-ITCSA405

EMC TEST REPORT - Addendum

Certification Test Report

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-247 ISSUE 1 CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. WLAN 2X2 MIMO a/b/g/n/ac with BLUETOOTH

FCC Test Report. : ASE Group 4F,No 133, Sec 4, Mingsheng E Rd, Songshan Dist, Taipei, Taiwan

FCC Part 15B Measurement and Test Report. For. GlobTek, Inc. 186 Veterans Dr. Northvale, NJ USA. FCC Part 15 Subpart B.

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. GSM/WCDMA/LTE Phone + BT/BLE, DTS/UNII a/b/g/n/ac, NFC and ANT+

A Test Lab Techno Corp. Report Number:1410FR27

Radio test report rev 2.0

Version TEST REPORT NO. DATE DESCRIPTION

Shenzhen Hong Puya Technology Co., Ltd.

Transcription:

Test Report No. : UL-RPT-RP11327903JD02A V3.0 Manufacturer : Kontakt Micro-Location Sp. z o.o. Model No. : Kontakt Smart Beacon 2 FCC ID : 2ADAO-SB2-V250 Technology : Bluetooth Low Energy Test Standard(s) : FCC Parts 15.209(a),15.35(c) & 15.247 1. This test report shall not be reproduced in full or partial, without the written approval of. 2. The results in this report apply only to the sample(s) tested. 3. The sample tested is in compliance with the above standard(s). 4. The test results in this report are traceable to the national or international standards. 5. Version 3.0 supersedes all previous versions. Date of Issue: 06 October 2017 Checked by: Company Signatory: Ian Watch Senior Test Engineer, Radio Laboratory Sarah Williams Senior Test Engineer, Radio Laboratory This laboratory is accredited by UKAS. The tests reported herein have been performed in accordance with its terms of accreditation. The Bluetooth word mark and logos are owned by the Bluetooth SIG, Inc. and any use of such marks by is under licence. Other trademarks and trade names are those of their respective owners. Pavilion A, Ashwood Park, Ashwood Way, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG23 8BG, UK Telephone: +44 (0)1256 312000 Facsimile: +44 (0)1256 312001

This page has been left intentionally blank. Page 2 of 32

Table of Contents 1. Customer Information... 4 2. Summary of Testing... 5 2.1. General Information 5 2.2. Summary of Test Results 5 2.3. Methods and Procedures 6 2.4. Deviations from the Test Specification 6 3. Equipment Under Test (EUT)... 7 3.1. Identification of Equipment Under Test (EUT) 7 3.2. Description of EUT 7 3.3. Modifications Incorporated in the EUT 7 3.4. Additional Information Related to Testing 8 3.5. Support Equipment 8 4. Operation and Monitoring of the EUT during Testing... 9 4.1. Operating Modes 9 4.2. Configuration and Peripherals 9 5. Measurements, Examinations and Derived Results...10 5.1. General Comments 10 5.2. Test Results 11 5.2.1. Transmitter Minimum 6 db Bandwidth 11 5.2.2. Transmitter Maximum Peak Output Power 14 5.2.3. Transmitter Duty Cycle 17 5.2.4. Transmitter Radiated Emissions 19 5.2.5. Transmitter Band Edge Radiated Emissions 28 6. Measurement Uncertainty...31 7. Report Revision History...32 Page 3 of 32

1. Customer Information Company Name: Kontakt Micro-Location Sp z o.o. Address: Stoczniowców 3 30-709 Kraków Poland Page 4 of 32

2. Summary of Testing 2.1. General Information Specification Reference: Specification Title: Specification Reference: Specification Title: 47CFR15.247 Code of Federal Regulations Volume 47 (Telecommunications): Part 15 Subpart C (Intentional Radiators) - Section 15.247 47CFR15.209 Site Registration: 209735 Location of Testing: Code of Federal Regulations Volume 47 (Telecommunications): Part 15 Subpart C (Intentional Radiators) Section 15.209, Unit 3 Horizon, Wade Road, Kingsland Business Park, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 8AH, United Kingdom Test Dates: 29 August 2017 to 08 September 2017 2.2. Summary of Test Results FCC Reference (47CFR) Measurement Result Part 15.247(a)(2) Part 15.247(b)(3) Transmitter Minimum 6 db Bandwidth Transmitter Maximum Peak Output Power Part 15.35(c) Transmitter Duty Cycle Note 1 Part 15.247(e) Transmitter Power Spectral Density Note 2 Part 15.247(d)/15.209(a) Part 15.247(d)/15.209(a) Transmitter Radiated Emissions Transmitter Band Edge Radiated Emissions Key to Results = Complied = Did not comply Note(s): 1. The measurement was performed to assist in the calculation of the level of emissions. The EUT cannot transmit continuously and sweep triggering/signal gating cannot be implemented. 2. In accordance with FCC KDB 558074 Section 10.1, PSD is not required if the maximum conducted output p is less than the PSD limit of 8 dbm / 3 khz. The PSD level is therefore deemed to be equal to the measured output power. Page 5 of 32

2.3. Methods and Procedures Reference: Title: ANSI C63.10-2013 American National Standard of Procedures for Compliance Testing of Unlicensed Wireless Devices Reference: KDB 558074 D01 DTS Meas Guidance v04 April 5, 2017 Title: 2.4. Deviations from the Test Specification Guidance for Performing Compliance Measurements on Digital Transmission Systems (DTS) Operating Under Section 15.247 For the measurements contained within this test report, there were no deviations from, additions to, or exclusions from the test specification identified above. Page 6 of 32

3. Equipment Under Test (EUT) 3.1. Identification of Equipment Under Test (EUT) Brand Name: Kontakt Smart Beacon 2 Model Name or Number: Kontakt Smart Beacon 2 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Radiated sample) Hardware Version: v2.5 Software Version: n/a FCC ID: 2ADAO-SB2-V250 Brand Name: Kontakt Smart Beacon 2 Model Name or Number: Kontakt Smart Beacon 2 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Conducted sample with RF port ) Hardware Version: v2.5 Software Version: FCC ID: 3.2. Description of EUT n/a 2ADAO-SB2-V250 The Equipment Under Test was a Bluetooth LE beacon device. Power is supplied by two CR2477 coin batteries. 3.3. Modifications Incorporated in the EUT The radiated spurious emissions testing was performed with the device housing removed to allow unique connection to the test cables. This can be considered worst case. Page 7 of 32

3.4. Additional Information Related to Testing Technology Tested: Type of Unit: Channel Spacing: Modulation: Data Rate: Bluetooth Low Energy (Digital Transmission System) Transceiver 2 MHz GFSK 1 Mbps Power Supply Requirement(s): Nominal 3.0 VDC Maximum Conducted Output Power: Antenna Gain: Transmit Frequency Range: Transmit Channels Tested: 3.5. Support Equipment 2.8 dbm 3.1 dbi 2402 MHz to 2480 MHz Channel ID RF Channel Channel Frequency (MHz) Bottom 0 2402 Middle 19 2440 Top 39 2480 The following support equipment was used to exercise the EUT during testing: Description: Brand Name: Model Name or Number: Serial Number: Laptop PC Dell E5400 UL Asset No.00788 Description: Brand Name: Model Name or Number: Serial Number: UART to USB converter Not marked or stated Not marked or stated Not marked or stated Description: Brand Name: Model Name or Number: Serial Number: USB Type A to Mini USB cable Not marked or stated Not marked or stated Not marked or stated Page 8 of 32

4. Operation and Monitoring of the EUT during Testing 4.1. Operating Modes The EUT was tested in the following operating mode(s): Transmitting at maximum power in Bluetooth LE mode with a modulated carrier, maximum data length available and Pseudorandom Bit Sequence 9 on bottom, middle or top channel as required. 4.2. Configuration and Peripherals The EUT was tested in the following configuration(s): The EUT was connected to the customer supplied UART to USB converter. The UART to USB converter was connected to the laptop PC by retractable USB cable. Controlled using the software application nrfgo Studio on the test laptop PC. The application was used to enable continuous transmission and receive mode (all circuits active but not transmitting) and to select the test channels as required. The customer supplied Kontakt Beacon Certificate test kit operating manual V1.2.pdf containing instructions for test mode. These instructions were followed. The EUT was configured to send the maximum packet length of 37 bytes containing PRBS9. The laptop PC and USB cable were disconnected from the UART to USB converter during radiated tests and then removed from the test chamber. Powered by a pair of fully charged CR2477 batteries. The battery voltage was monitored throughout testing and the batteries replaced as required. Page 9 of 32

5. Measurements, Examinations and Derived Results 5.1. General Comments Measurement uncertainties are evaluated in accordance with current best practice. Our reported expanded uncertainties are based on standard uncertainties, which are multiplied by an appropriate coverage factor to provide a statistical confidence level of approximately 95%. Please refer to Section 6. Measurement Uncertainty for details. In accordance with UKAS requirements all the measurement equipment is on a calibration schedule. All equipment was within the calibration period on the date of testing. Page 10 of 32

5.2. Test Results 5.2.1. Transmitter Minimum 6 db Bandwidth Test Summary: Test Engineer: David Doyle Test Date: 08 September 2017 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Conducted sample with RF port ) FCC Reference: Part 15.247(a)(2) Test Method Used: FCC KDB 558074 Section 8.1 Option 1 Environmental Conditions: Temperature ( C): 25 Relative Humidity (%): 48 Note(s): 1. 6 db DTS bandwidth tests were performed using a test receiver in accordance with FCC KDB 558074 Section 8.1 Option 1 measurement procedure. The test receiver resolution bandwidth was set to 100 khz and video bandwidth 300 khz. A peak detector was used, sweep time was set to auto and the trace mode was Max Hold. The DTS bandwidth was measured at 6 db down from the peak of the signal. 2. The test receiver was connected to the RF port on the EUT using suitable attenuation and RF cable. Test setup: Page 11 of 32

Transmitter Minimum 6 db Bandwidth (continued) Results: Channel 6 db Bandwidth (khz) Limit (khz) Margin (khz) Result Bottom 701.923 500 201.923 Complied Middle 682.692 500 182.692 Complied Top 692.308 500 192.308 Complied RBW 100 khz Marker 1 [T1 ] RBW 100 khz Marker 1 [T1 ] VBW 300 khz -3.83 dbm VBW 300 khz -3.53 dbm Ref 20 dbm Att 25 db SWT 2.5 ms 2.401625000 GHz Ref 20 dbm Att 25 db SWT 2.5 ms 2.439625000 GHz 20 Offset 20.1 db Delta 2 [T1 ] 0.07 db 20 Offset 20.1 db Delta 2 [T1 ] -0.09 db 10 701.923076912 khz A 10 682.692307682 khz A 1 PK 0 D1 2.5 dbm D2-3.5 dbm 1 2 LVL 1 PK 0 D1 2.5 dbm D2-3.5 dbm 1 2 LVL -10-10 -20-20 -30-30 -40 3DB AC -40 3DB AC -50-50 -60-60 -70-70 -80-80 Center 2.402 GHz 300 khz/ Span 3 MHz Center 2.44 GHz 300 khz/ Span 3 MHz 11327903 Date: 8.SEP.2017 09:03:05 11327903 Date: 8.SEP.2017 09:04:53 Bottom Channel Middle Channel Ref 20 dbm Att 25 db RBW 100 khz VBW 300 khz SWT 2.5 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] -3.83 dbm 2.479620192 GHz 20 10 Offset 20.1 db Delta 2 [T1 ] -0.09 db 692.307692297 khz A 1 PK 0 D1 2.3 dbm D2-3.7 dbm 1 2 LVL -10-20 -30 3DB -40 AC -50-60 -70-80 Center 2.48 GHz 300 khz/ Span 3 MHz 11327903 Date: 8.SEP.2017 09:06:45 Top Channel Page 12 of 32

Transmitter Minimum 6 db Bandwidth (continued) Test Equipment Used: Asset No. Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Calibration Due Cal. Interval (Months) M2002 Thermohygrometer Testo 608-H1 45041825 22 Feb 2018 12 M1886 Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESU26 100554 04 Apr 2018 12 A2522 Attenuator AtlanTecRF AN18-20 832797#3 Calibrated before use - M1252 Signal Generator Hewlett Packard 83640A 3119A00489 26 Oct 2017 12 M199 Power Meter Rohde & Schwarz NRVS 827023/075 11 Apr 2018 24 M1267 Power Sensor Rohde & Schwarz NRV-Z52 100155 15 Apr 2018 24 M1251 Digital Multimeter Fluke 175 89170179 10 May 2018 12 Page 13 of 32

5.2.2. Transmitter Maximum Peak Output Power Test Summary: Test Engineer: Andrew Edwards Test Date: 30 August 2017 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Conducted sample with RF port ) FCC Reference: Part 15.247(b)(3) Test Method Used: FCC KDB 558074 Section 9.1.1 Environmental Conditions: Temperature ( C): 25 Relative Humidity (%): 43 Note(s): 1. Conducted power tests were performed using a test receiver in accordance with FCC KDB 558074 Section 9.1.1 Measurement Procedure. 2. The test receiver resolution bandwidth was set to 1 MHz and video bandwidth of 3 MHz. A peak detector was used, sweep time was set to auto and trace mode was Max Hold. The span was set to 5 MHz. A marker was placed at the peak of the signal and the results recorded in the table below. 3. The test receiver was connected to the RF port on the EUT using suitable attenuation and RF cable. An RF level offset was entered on the test receiver to compensate for the loss of the attenuator and RF cable. 4. The conducted power was added to the declared antenna gain to obtain the EIRP. Test setup: Page 14 of 32

Transmitter Maximum Peak Output Power (continued) Results: Channel Conducted Peak Power (dbm) Conducted Peak Power Limit (dbm) Margin Result Bottom 2.8 30.0 27.2 Complied Middle 2.7 30.0 27.3 Complied Top 2.5 30.0 27.5 Complied Channel Conducted Peak Power (dbm) Declared Antenna Gain (dbi) EIRP (dbm) De Facto EIRP Limit (dbm) Margin Result Bottom 2.8 3.1 5.9 36.0 30.1 Complied Middle 2.7 3.1 5.8 36.0 30.2 Complied Top 2.5 3.1 5.6 36.0 30.4 Complied Page 15 of 32

Transmitter Maximum Peak Output Power (continued) Marker 1 [T1] RBW 1 MHz RF Att 10 db Ref Lvl 2.75 dbm VBW 3 MHz 20 dbm 2.40171443 GHz SWT 5 ms Unit dbm 20 20.1 db Offset 1 [T1] 2.75 dbm A 2.40171443 GHz 10 1 0 Marker 1 [T1] Ref Lvl 2.74 dbm 20 dbm 2.43971443 GHz 20 20.1 db Offset 10 1 0 RBW 1 MHz RF Att 10 db VBW 3 MHz SWT 5 ms Unit dbm 1 [T1] 2.74 dbm A 2.43971443 GHz -10 IN1-10 IN1 1 1MA 1 1MA -20-20 -30-30 -40-40 -50-50 -60-60 -70-70 -80-80 Center 2.402 GHz 500 khz/ Span 5 MHz Center 2.44 GHz 500 khz/ Span 5 MHz Title: 11327903 Date: 30.AUG.2017 18:49:00 Bottom Channel Title: 11327903 Date: 30.AUG.2017 18:51:43 Middle Channel Marker 1 [T1] Ref Lvl 2.50 dbm 20 dbm 2.47972445 GHz 20 20.1 db Offset 10 RBW 1 MHz RF Att 10 db VBW 3 MHz SWT 5 ms Unit dbm 1 [T1] 2.50 dbm A 2.47972445 GHz 1 0-10 1 IN1 1MA -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 -80 Center 2.48 GHz 500 khz/ Span 5 MHz Title: 11327903 Date: 30.AUG.2017 18:52:56 Top Channel Test Equipment Used: Asset No. Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Calibration Due Cal. Interval (Months) M1659 Thermohygrometer JM Handelspunkt 30.5015.13 Not stated 22 Feb 2018 12 M1124 Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESIB26 100046 13 Jul 2018 12 A2522 Attenuator AtlanTecRF AN18-20 832797#3 Calibrated before use - M1252 Signal Generator Hewlett Packard 83640A 3119A00489 26 Oct 2017 12 M199 Power Meter Rohde & Schwarz NRVS 827023/075 11 Apr 2018 24 M1267 Power Sensor Rohde & Schwarz NRV-Z52 100155 15 Apr 2018 24 M1251 Digital Multimeter Fluke 175 89170179 10 May 2018 12 Page 16 of 32

5.2.3. Transmitter Duty Cycle Test Summary: Test Engineers: David Doyle Test Date: 29 August 2017 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Radiated sample) FCC Reference: Part 15.35(c) Test Method Used: FCC KDB 558074 Section 6.0 Environmental Conditions: Temperature ( C): 23 Relative Humidity (%): 50 Note(s): 1. In order to assist with the determination of the average level of spurious emissions field strength, measurements were made of duty cycle to determine the transmission duration and the silent period time of the transmitter. The transmitter was measured using a test receiver in the time domain and calculated as shown below: Test setup: Anechoic chamber 10 log (1 / (On Time / [Period or 100 ms whichever is the lesser])). 10 log (1 / (430.769/ 628.846)) = 1.6 db Page 17 of 32

Transmitter Duty Cycle (continued) Results: Pulse Duration (µs) Period (µs) Duty Cycle 430.770 628.846 1.6 Ref 110 dbµv * Att 10 db RBW 10 MHz * VBW 10 MHz SWT 1.2 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] 91.95 dbµv 503.846154 µs 110 Offset 10.1 db Delta 2 [T1 ] 3.17 db 100 1 PK * 90 1 430.769231 µs Delta 2 3 [T1 ] 3 1.95 db 628.846154 µs A SGL LVL 80 TDF 70 60 3DB 50 AC 40 30 20 10 Center 2.402 GHz 120 µs/ 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 11:40:39 Test Equipment Used: Asset No. Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Calibration Due Cal. Interval (Months) M2003 Thermohygrometer Testo 608-H1 45046641 22 Feb 2018 12 K0017 3m RSE Chamber Rainford EMC N/A N/A 14 Apr 2018 12 M1995 Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESU40 100428 13 Apr 2018 12 A2863 Pre Amplifier Agilent 8449B 3008A02100 11 Apr 2018 12 A2889 Antenna Schwarzbeck BBHA 9120 B BBHA 9120 B 653 11 Apr 2018 12 A2916 Attenuator AtlanTecRF AN18W5-10 832827#1 03 Mar 2018 12 M1251 Digital Multimeter Fluke 175 89170179 10 May 2018 12 Page 18 of 32

5.2.4. Transmitter Radiated Emissions Test Summary: Test Engineer: Alan Withers Test Date: 30 August 2017 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Radiated sample) FCC Reference: Parts 15.247(d) & 15.209(a) Test Method Used: ANSI C63.10 Sections 6.3 and 6.5 Frequency Range Environmental Conditions: Temperature ( C): 24 Relative Humidity (%): 49 Note(s): 30 MHz to 1000 MHz 1. The final measured value, for the given emission, in the table below incorporates the calibrated antenna factor and cable loss. 2. The preliminary scans showed similar emission levels below 1 GHz, for each channel of operation. Therefore final radiated emissions measurements were performed with the EUT set to the middle channel only. 3. Measurements below 1 GHz were performed in a semi-anechoic chamber (Asset Number K0017) at a distance of 3 metres. The EUT was placed at a height of 80 cm above the reference ground plane in the centre of the chamber turntable. Maximum emission levels were determined by height searching the measurement antenna over the range 1 metre to 4 metres. 4. Pre-scans were performed and markers placed on the highest measured levels. The test receiver resolution bandwidth was set to 120 khz and video bandwidth 500 khz. A peak detector was used, sweep time was set to auto and trace mode was Max Hold. Page 19 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Test setup for radiated measurements: Semi-anechoic chamber < 1 GHz: EUT Measurement Antenna & Attenuator Low Pass Filter Test Receiver UART to USB Converter Anechoic chamber 1GHz to 8 GHz: EUT Measurement Antenna Attenuator / High Pass Filter Amplifier Test Receiver UART to USB Converter Page 20 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Test setup for radiated measurements: Anechoic chamber > 8 GHz: EUT Measurement Antenna High Pass Filter Amplifier Test Receiver UART to USB Converter Page 21 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Results: Middle Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Limit Margin Result 956.040 Vertical 32.7 46.0 13.3 Complied Ref 70 dbµv * Att 0 db * RBW 120 khz * VBW 500 khz SWT 165 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] 23.75 dbµv 66.630610072 MHz 1 PK 70 Offset 0.4 db 60 50 FCC_PT15 40 100 MHz Marker 2 [T1 ] 1 GHz 20.65 dbµv 203.861605825 MHz A Marker 3 [T1 ] 32.68 dbµv 956.039670475 MHz LVL Marker 4 [T1 ] 32.51 dbµv TDF 977.772811278 MHz 34 LNA 30 20 1 2 10 6DB AC 0-10 -20-30 Start 30 MHz Stop 1 GHz 11327903 Date: 30.AUG.2017 00:05:14 Test Equipment Used: Asset No. Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Calibration Due Cal. Interval (Months) M2003 Thermohygrometer Testo 608-H1 45046641 22 Feb 2018 12 K0017 3m RSE Chamber Rainford EMC N/A N/A 14 Apr 2018 12 M1995 Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESU40 100428 13 Apr 2018 12 A2888 Antenna Schwarzbeck VULB 9163 9163-941 25 Apr 2018 12 A2147 Attenuator AtlanTecRF AN18-06 09020206-06 25 Apr 2018 12 A2131 Low Pass Filter AtlanTecRF AFL-02000 JFB1004-002 27 Feb 2018 12 M1251 Digital Multimeter Fluke 175 89170179 10 May 2018 12 Page 22 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Test Summary: Test Engineers: Test Sample Serial Number: David Doyle, Andrew Edwards & Alan Withers Not marked or stated (Radiated sample) Test Date: 29 August 2017 FCC Reference: Parts 15.247(d) & 15.209(a) Test Method Used: FCC KDB 558074 Sections 11 & 12.2.5.2 referencing ANSI C63.10 Sections 6.3 and 6.6 Frequency Range Environmental Conditions: Temperature ( C): 24 to 25 Relative Humidity (%): 49 to 50 Note(s): 1 GHz to 25 GHz 1. The final measured value, for the given emission, in the table below incorporates the calibrated antenna factor and cable loss. 2. The emission shown on the 1 GHz to 3 GHz plot is the EUT fundamental. 3. All other emissions shown on the pre-scan plots were investigated and found to be ambient, or >20 db below the applicable limit or below the measurement system noise floor 4. The reference level for the emission in the non-restricted band was established by following KDB 558074 Section 11.2 procedure. 5. *-20 dbc limit applies in non-restricted band as the conducted output power measurements were performed using a peak detector. 6. **In accordance with ANSI C63.10 Section 6.6.4.3, Note 1, if the peak measured value complies with the average limit, it is unnecessary to perform an average measurement. 7. Pre-scans above 1 GHz were performed in a fully anechoic chamber (Asset Number K0017) at a distance of 3 metres. The EUT was placed at a height of 1.5 metres above the test chamber floor in the centre of the chamber turntable. All measurement antennas were placed at a fixed height of 1.5 metres above the test chamber floor, in line with the EUT. Final measurements above 1 GHz were performed in a fully anechoic chamber (Asset Number K0017) at a distance of 3 metres. The EUT was placed at a height of 1.5 m above the reference ground plane in the centre of the chamber turntable. Maximum emission levels were determined by height searching the measurement antenna over the range 1 metre to 4 metres. 8. Pre-scans were performed and a marker placed on the highest measured level of the appropriate plot. The test receiver resolution bandwidth was set to 1 MHz and video bandwidth 3 MHz. The sweep time was set to auto. Page 23 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Results: Peak / Bottom Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Limit Margin Result 2317.750 Vertical 58.3 74.0 15.7 Complied 2373.240 Vertical 60.9 74.0 13.1 Complied 4804.294 Horizontal 56.9 74.0 17.1 Complied 7205.970 Horizontal 57.9 74.6* 16.7 Complied 9607.925 Horizontal 58.9 74.6* 15.7 Complied 12008.680 Horizontal 56.0 74.0 18.0 Complied Results: Average / Bottom Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Correction Factor Corrected Level Limit Margin Result 2317.750 Vertical 41.3 1.6 42.9 54.0 11.1 Complied 2373.240 Vertical 42.6 1.6 44.2 54.0 9.8 Complied 4804.294 Horizontal 51.7 1.6 53.3 54.0 0.7 Complied 12008.680 Horizontal 48.6 1.6 50.2 54.0 3.8 Complied Results: Peak / Middle Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Limit Margin Result 2493.160 Vertical 55.7 74.0 18.3 Complied 4879.718 Vertical 53.4 54.0** 0.6 Complied 7319.229 Horizontal 56.2 74.0 17.8 Complied 12198.576 Horizontal 50.3 54.0** 3.7 Complied Results: Average / Middle Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Correction Factor Corrected Level Limit Margin Result 2493.160 Vertical 42.7 1.6 44.3 54.0 9.7 Complied 7319.229 Horizontal 48.6 1.6 50.2 54.0 3.8 Complied Page 24 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Results: Peak / Top Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Limit Margin Result 2492.725 Vertical 61.8 74.0 12.2 Complied 2561.411 Vertical 61.3 76.5* 15.2 Complied 4959.862 Horizontal 54.7 74.0 19.3 Complied Results: Average / Top Channel Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity Level Correction Factor Corrected Level Limit Margin Result 2492.725 Vertical 44.2 1.6 45.8 54.0 8.2 Complied 4959.862 Horizontal 45.5 1.6 47.1 54.0 6.9 Complied Page 25 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) * RBW 1 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * RBW 1 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * VBW 3 MHz 60.07 dbµv * VBW 3 MHz 50.91 dbµv Ref 120 dbµv * Att 5 db SWT 20 ms 2.562000000 GHz Ref 80 dbµv * Att 10 db SWT 45 ms 4.879500000 GHz 120 Offset 10.4 db 110 1 PK 100 2 RM * 90 Marker 2 [T1 ] 53.21 dbµv 2.949500000 GHz A Marker 3 [T2 ] 47.01 dbµv 2.108000000 GHz LVL Marker 4 [T2 ] 56.09 dbµv TDF 2.493641026 GHz 80 Offset 1 db D1 74 dbµv 70 1 PK 60 2 RM * D2 54 dbµv MAXH 50 1 Marker 2 [T1 ] 49.24 dbµv 7.905500000 GHz A Marker 3 [T2 ] 48.92 dbµv 7.321000000 GHz LVL Marker 4 [T2 ] 343.80 dbµv 2 TDF 7.872000000 GHz 4 80 40 D1 74 dbµv 70 30 60 D2 54 dbµv 4 1 2 3DB AC 20 3DB AC 50 3 10 40 0 30-10 20-20 Start 1 GHz 200 MHz/ Stop 3 GHz Start 3 GHz 500 MHz/ Stop 8 GHz 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 18:02:36 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 19:19:48 * RBW 1 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * RBW 1 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * VBW 3 MHz 53.29 dbµv * VBW 3 MHz 41.56 dbµv Ref 80 dbµv * Att 0 db SWT 85 ms 9.759000000 GHz Ref 80 dbµv * Att 0 db SWT 60 ms 23.343000000 GHz 80 Offset 1 db D1 74 dbµv 70 1 PK 60 1 2 RM * D2 54 dbµv 50 2 Marker 2 [T2 ] 42.88 dbµv 12.199000000 GHz A Marker 3 [T1 ] 50.58 dbµv 17.974500000 GHz LVL Marker 4 [T2 ] 44.96 dbµv3 TDF 17.860500000 GHz 4 80 70 1 PK 60 2 RM * 50 D1 74 dbµv D2 54 dbµv Marker 2 [T2 ] 35.41 dbµv 24.491000000 GHz A TDF 1 40 40 2 30 30 20 3DB AC 20 3DB AC 10 10 0 0-10 -10-20 -20 Start 8 GHz 1 GHz/ Stop 18 GHz Start 18 GHz 700 MHz/ Stop 25 GHz 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 15:03:36 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 22:37:12 Note: The above plots are pre-scans and for indication purposes only. For final measurements, see accompanying tables. Page 26 of 32

Transmitter Radiated Emissions (continued) Test Equipment Used: Asset No. Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Calibration Due Cal. Interval (Months) M2003 Thermohygrometer Testo 608-H1 45046641 22 Feb 2018 12 K0017 3m RSE Chamber Rainford EMC N/A N/A 14 Apr 2018 12 M1995 Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESU40 100428 13 Apr 2018 12 A2863 Pre Amplifier Agilent 8449B 3008A02100 11 Apr 2018 12 A2891 Pre Amplifier Schwarzbeck BBV 9718 9718-306 11 Apr 2018 12 A2893 Pre Amplifier Schwarzbeck BBV 9721 9721-021 11 Apr 2018 12 A2889 Antenna Schwarzbeck BBHA 9120 B BBHA 9120 B 653 11 Apr 2018 12 A2890 Antenna Schwarzbeck HWRD 750 014 11 Apr 2018 12 A2892 Antenna Schwarzbeck BBHA 9170 9170-727 11 Apr 2018 12 A2916 Attenuator AtlanTecRF AN18W5-10 832827#1 03 Mar 2018 12 A2914 High Pass Filter AtlanTecRF AFH-03000 2155 06 Mar 2018 12 A2947 High Pass Filter AtlanTecRF AFH-07000 1601900001 18 May 2018 12 M1251 Digital Multimeter Fluke 175 89170179 10 May 2018 12 Page 27 of 32

5.2.5. Transmitter Band Edge Radiated Emissions Test Summary: Test Engineer: David Doyle Test Date: 29 August 2017 Test Sample Serial Number: Not marked or stated (Radiated sample) FCC Reference: Test Method Used: Parts 15.247(d) & 15.209(a) ANSI C63.10 Section 6.10.4, 6.10.5, KDB 558074 Section 11 & 12.2.5.2 Environmental Conditions: Temperature ( C): 23 Relative Humidity (%): 50 Note(s): 1. The final measured value, for the given emission, in the table below incorporates the calibrated antenna factor and cable loss. 2. The maximum peak conducted output power was previously measured. In accordance with FCC KDB 558074 Section 11.1(a), the lower band edge measurement was performed with a peak detector and the -20 dbc limit applied. 3. As the lower band edge falls within a non-restricted band, only peak measurements are required. In accordance with FCC KDB 558074 Section 11.1, the test method in Section 11.3 was followed: the test receiver resolution bandwidth was set to 100 khz and video bandwidth 300 khz. A peak detector was used, sweep time was set to auto and trace mode was Max Hold. The test receiver was left to sweep for a sufficient length of time in order to maximise the carrier level and out-of-band emissions. A marker and corresponding reference level line were placed on the peak of the carrier. As the maximum peak conducted output power was measured using a peak detector in accordance with FCC KDB 558074 Section 9.1.1 an out-of-band limit line was placed 20 db below the peak level (FCC KDB 558074 Section 11.1(a)). A marker was placed on the band edge spot frequencies and a second marker placed on the highest emission level in the adjacent non-restricted band of operation (where a higher level emission was present). Marker frequencies and levels were recorded. 4. As the upper band edge falls within a restricted band both peak and average measurements were recorded by placing a marker at the edge of the band. For peak measurements the test receiver resolution bandwidth was set to 1 MHz and the video bandwidth 3 MHz. A peak detector was used, sweep time was set to auto and trace mode was Max Hold. Average measurements were performed using KDB 558074 Method 12.2.5.2 and the measure duty cycle was added to the measured level as a correction factor. A marker was placed on the band edge spot frequencies and a second marker placed on the highest emission level in the adjacent restricted band of operation (where a higher level emission was present). Marker frequencies and levels were recorded. 5. There is a restricted band 10 MHz below the lower band edge. The test receiver was set up as follows: the RBW set to 1 MHz, the VBW set to 3 MHz, with the sweep time set to auto couple. Average measurements were performed using KDB 558074 Method 12.2.5.2 and the measure duty cycle was added to the measured level as a correction factor. Markers were placed on the highest point on each trace. 6. The reference level was set to 110 dbµv in order to achieve sufficient headroom. Page 28 of 32

Transmitter Band Edge Radiated Emissions (continued) Results: Peak Frequency (MHz) Level Limit Margin Result 2400.000 52.1 74.6 22.5 Complied 2483.500 61.2 74.0 12.8 Complied Results: Average Frequency (MHz) Level Correction Factor Corrected Level Limit Margin Result 2483.500 50.6 1.6 52.2 54.0 1.8 Complied Results: 2310 MHz to 2390 MHz Restricted Band / Peak Frequency (MHz) Level Limit Margin Result 2332.436 55.9 74.0 18.1 Complied 2387.564 59.0 74.0 15.0 Complied Results: 2310 MHz to 2390 MHz Restricted Band / Average Frequency (MHz) Level Correction Factor Corrected Level Limit Margin Result 2332.436 40.6 1.6 42.2 54.0 11.8 Complied 2387.821 41.8 1.6 43.4 54.0 10.6 Complied Page 29 of 32

Transmitter Band Edge Radiated Emissions (continued) * RBW 100 khz Marker 1 [T1 ] * RBW 1 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] VBW 300 khz 52.09 dbµv * VBW 3 MHz 61.21 dbµv Ref 110 dbµv * Att 10 db SWT 20 ms 2.400000000 GHz Ref 110 dbµv * Att 10 db SWT 2.5 ms 2.483500000 GHz 110 Offset 10.1 db 110 Offset 10.1 db Marker 2 [T1 ] 60.87 dbµv 1 PK 100 90 D1 94.6 dbµv A LVL 1 PK 100 90 2.506416667 GHz A Marker 3 [T2 ] 50.58 dbµv 2.483500000 GHz LVL 80 TDF 2 RM * 80 TDF D2 74.6 dbµv D1 74 dbµv 70 70 1 2 60 60 50 1 3DB AC SWP 44 of 300 D2 54 dbµv 50 3 3DB AC 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 F1 10 F1 Center 2.4 GHz 5 MHz/ Span 50 MHz Center 2.4835 GHz 5 MHz/ Span 50 MHz 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 11:42:27 Lower Band Edge Peak 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 12:06:02 Upper Band Edge Peak and Average 1 PK 2 RM * Ref 110 dbµv * Att 10 db 110 100 90 80 70 Offset 10.1 db D1 74 dbµv * RBW 1 MHz * VBW 3 MHz SWT 2.5 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] 58.99 dbµv 2.387564103 GHz Marker 2 [T1 ] 55.89 dbµv 2.332435897 GHz A Marker 3 [T2 ] 41.83 dbµv 2.387820513 GHz LVL Marker 4 [T2 ] 40.61 dbµv TDF 2.332435897 GHz 60 2 SWP 300 of 300 D2 54 dbµv 50 4 40 1 3 3DB AC 30 20 10 Start 2.31 GHz 8 MHz/ Stop 2.39 GHz 11327903 Date: 29.AUG.2017 11:45:07 2310 MHz to 2390 MHz Restricted Band Test Equipment Used: Asset No. Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Calibration Due Cal. Interval (Months) M2003 Thermohygrometer Testo 608-H1 45046641 22 Feb 2018 12 K0017 3m RSE Chamber Rainford EMC N/A N/A 14 Apr 2018 12 M1995 Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESU40 100428 13 Apr 2018 12 A2863 Pre Amplifier Agilent 8449B 3008A02100 11 Apr 2018 12 A2889 Antenna Schwarzbeck BBHA 9120 B BBHA 9120 B 653 11 Apr 2018 12 A2916 Attenuator AtlanTecRF AN18W5-10 832827#1 03 Mar 2018 12 M1251 Digital Multimeter Fluke 175 89170179 10 May 2018 12 Page 30 of 32

6. Measurement Uncertainty No measurement or test can ever be perfect and the imperfections give rise to error of measurement in the results. Consequently the result of a measurement is only an approximation to the value measured (the specific quantity subject to measurement) and is only complete when accompanied by a statement of the uncertainty of the approximation. The expression of uncertainty of a measurement result allows realistic comparison of results with reference values and limits given in specifications and standards. The uncertainty of the result may need to be taken into account when interpreting the measurement results. The reported expanded uncertainties below are based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by an appropriate coverage factor such that a confidence level of approximately 95% is maintained. For the purposes of this document approximately is interpreted as meaning effectively or for most practical purposes. Measurement Type Range Confidence Level (%) Calculated Uncertainty Minimum 6 db Bandwidth 2.4 GHz to 2.4835 GHz 95% ±4.59 % Conducted Maximum Peak Output Power 2.4 GHz to 2.4835 GHz 95% ±1.13 db Duty Cycle 2.4 GHz to 2.4835 GHz 95% ±1.14 % Radiated Spurious Emissions 30 MHz to 1 GHz 95% ±5.65 db Radiated Spurious Emissions 1 GHz to 25 GHz 95% ±2.94 db The methods used to calculate the above uncertainties are in line with those recommended within the various measurement specifications. Where measurement specifications do not include guidelines for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty the published guidance of the appropriate accreditation body is followed. Page 31 of 32

7. Report Revision History Version Number Revision Details Page No(s) Clause Details 1.0 - - Initial Version 2.0 - - Section 3.1 updated 3.0 - - Section 3.3 updated --- END OF REPORT --- Page 32 of 32