GrypperG Contact 0.4 Pitch, 0.25 Ball Diameter 0.5 Pitch, 0.25 Ball Diameter RF CHARACTERIZATION SUMMARY TEST OBJECTIVE

Similar documents
Aries Kapton CSP socket

T est POST OFFICE BOX 1927 CUPERTINO, CA TEL E P H ONE (408) FAX (408) ARIES ELECTRONICS

Optimization of Wafer Level Test Hardware using Signal Integrity Simulation

Aries QFP microstrip socket

Schematic-Level Transmission Line Models for the Pyramid Probe

Aries CSP microstrip socket Cycling test

Aries Kapton CSP socket Cycling test

Managing Complex Impedance, Isolation & Calibration for KGD RF Test Abstract

Custom Interconnects Fuzz Button with Hardhat Test Socket/Interposer 1.00 mm pitch

Aries Center probe CSP socket Cycling test

GigaTest Labs CINCH 1 MM PITCH CIN::APSE LGA SOCKET. Final Report. August 31, Electrical Characterization

DESIGN OF A UMTS MONOBLOCK FILTER USING AN EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT APPROACH

Microwave Metrology -ECE 684 Spring Lab Exercise T: TRL Calibration and Probe-Based Measurement

This chapter shows various ways of creating matching networks by sweeping values and using optimization. Lab 5: Matching & Optimization

From the Design-Guide menu on the ADS Schematic window, select (Filters Design-Guide) > Utilities > Smith Chart Control Window.

B2501 B Series 0.5mm (.0197) Pitch

Wafer-scale 3D integration of silicon-on-insulator RF amplifiers

RFIC DESIGN EXAMPLE: MIXER

Impedance Matching to 50Ω

PDN Probes. P2100A/P2101A Data Sheet. 1-Port and 2-Port 50 ohm Passive Probes

The Challenges of Differential Bus Design

Exercises for the Antenna Matching Course

Application Note 5525

MSPP Page 1. MSPP Competencies in SiP Integration for Wireless Applications

Chapter 2. Inductor Design for RFIC Applications

300 frequencies is calculated from electromagnetic analysis at only four frequencies. This entire analysis takes only four minutes.

A 400, 900, and 1800 MHz Buffer/Driver Amplifier using the HBFP-0450 Silicon Bipolar Transistor

October Suzhou - Shenzhen, China. Archive TestConX - Image: Breath10/iStock

Fuzz Button interconnects at microwave and mm-wave frequencies

Diplexers With Cross Coupled Structure Between the Resonators Using LTCC Technology

SHELLCASE-TYPE WAFER-LEVEL PACKAGING SOLUTIONS: RF CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING

ON-CHIP TECHNOLOGY INDEPENDENT 3-D MOD- ELS FOR MILLIMETER-WAVE TRANSMISSION LINES WITH BEND AND GAP DISCONTINUITY

ADS Application Notes. The Components Characterization Using ADS

AM036MX-QG-R 1 WATT, 2 GHz POWER AMPLIFIER

APPLICATION SPECIFICATION

LAB EXERCISE 3 FET Amplifier Design and Linear Analysis

Considerations in High-Speed High Performance Die-Package-Board Co-Design. Jenny Jiang Altera Packaging Department October 2014

DESIGN OF HIGH POWER AND EFFICIENT RF LDMOS PA FOR ISM APPLICATIONS

Research Article Compact and Wideband Parallel-Strip 180 Hybrid Coupler with Arbitrary Power Division Ratios

Today I would like to present a short introduction to microstrip cross-coupled filter design. I will be using Sonnet em to analyze my planar circuit.

Methodology for MMIC Layout Design

Uncertainties of immunity measurements

Network Evaluation for the PW A10 Schematic Review Prepared by David Green; W7NE Revision: 1.0 Complete Friday, October 20, 2006

March 4-7, 2018 Hilton Phoenix / Mesa Hotel Mesa, Arizona Archive

Analysis and design of lumped element Marchand baluns

Application Note 1330

High-Frequency Characterization of Through Package Vias Formed by Focused Electrical-Discharge in Thin Glass Interposers

ARCHIVE Gert Hohenwarter, Ph.D. President Gatewave Northern, Inc. ABSTRACT

Wafer-Level Calibration & Verification up to 750 GHz. Choon Beng Sia, Ph.D. Mobile:

Case Study: Parallel Coupled-Line Combline Filter. Microwave filter design. Specifications. Case Study: Parallel Coupled- Line Combline Filter

The Inductance Loop Power Distribution in the Semiconductor Test Interface. Jason Mroczkowski Multitest

A COMPACT DUAL-BAND POWER DIVIDER USING PLANAR ARTIFICIAL TRANSMISSION LINES FOR GSM/DCS APPLICATIONS

Maxim > Design Support > Technical Documents > Application Notes > Wireless and RF > APP 3571

Application Note 5038

NN Design Hub: NN Librarie[S]

Signal Integrity Modeling and Measurement of TSV in 3D IC

Chapter 2 Displaying Characteristics

5.8 GHz Charge Pump Receiver

Advanced Design System - Fundamentals. Mao Wenjie

Archive 2017 BiTS Workshop- Image: Easyturn/iStock

Impedance Matching Techniques for Mixers and Detectors. Application Note 963

Magnetic-free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled-resonator loops

RF Circuit Synthesis for Physical Wireless Design

LTCC modules for a multiple 3-bit phase shifter with RF-MEMS-switch integration

A PROBE TECHNOLOGY FOR 110+ GHZ INTEGRATED CIRCUITS WITH ALUMINUM PADS

MMIC/RFIC Packaging Challenges Webcast (July 28, AM PST 12PM EST)

Upper UWB Interference Free Filter Using Dumb- Bell Resonator and Vias

Amateur Extra Manual Chapter 9.4 Transmission Lines

MPC 5534 Case study. E. Sicard (1), B. Vrignon (2) Toulouse France. Contact : web site :

ELC 4383 RF/Microwave Circuits I Laboratory 8: Lumped-Element Low-Pass Filter

Investigation of a Voltage Probe in Microstrip Technology

Design and simulation of Parallel circuit class E Power amplifier

Z-Wrap-110 Loss 31 July 01

A New Topology of Load Network for Class F RF Power Amplifiers

S-Parameters Simulation

Synthesis of Optimal On-Chip Baluns

PCB Crosstalk Simulation Toolkit Mark Sitkowski Design Simulation Systems Ltd Based on a paper by Ladd & Costache

Probing Techniques for Signal Performance Measurements in High Data Rate Testing

Through Glass Via (TGV) Technology for RF Applications

A GSM Band Low-Power LNA 1. LNA Schematic

Time Domain Reflectometer Example

Model B0922N7575AHF Rev B. Ultra Low Profile 0404 Balun

Lecture 4 RF Amplifier Design. Johan Wernehag, EIT. Johan Wernehag Electrical and Information Technology

Commercially available GaAs MMIC processes allow the realisation of components that can be used to implement passive filters, these include:

CMY210. Demonstration Board Documentation / Applications Note (V1.0) Ultra linear General purpose up/down mixer 1. DESCRIPTION

Christopher J. Barnwell ECE Department U. N. Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

Designing VHF Lumped-Element Couplers With MW Office

A Coupled-Fed Reconfigurable Antenna for Internal LTE Mobile Phone Applications

Evaluation of Package Properties for RF BJTs

Optimizing Design of a Probe Card using a Field Solver

Optimization of Integrated Electro-Absorption Modulated Laser Structures for 100 Gbit/s Ethernet Using Electromagnetic Simulation

his report is my recent analysis of the EH antenna using the Pspice program and considering the antenna as a set of circuit elements.

Student Research & Creative Works

Signal Integrity Design of TSV-Based 3D IC

Signal Integrity Modeling and Simulation for IC/Package Co-Design

Design and Demonstration of a Passive, Broadband Equalizer for an SLED Chris Brinton, Matthew Wharton, and Allen Katz

Design Approach of a Wideband Frequency Tunable Triangular Patch Array with Concurrent Polarization Alteration

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Low Noise Amplifier for 3.5 GHz using the Avago ATF Low Noise PHEMT. Application Note 1271

Integrated Passive Device (IPD) Technology for Wireless Applications

Transcription:

RF HARATERIZATION SUMMARY GrypperG4 14468-14 ontact.4 Pitch,.25 Ball Diameter.5 Pitch,.25 Ball Diameter TEST OBJETIVE The objective of this report is to determine the RF transmission characteristics of the HSIO Technologies Grypper G4 socket for the GSG (ground-signal-ground) configurations. Two product variations at pitches of.4 mm and.5 mm were studied. Three-dimensional electromagnetic (EM) field models were simulated for sockets with three contacts embedded in the dielectric material at a pitch of.4 mm. Real measurements were performed on the.4 mm product, and correlated to the simulated 3D model. Schematic level circuit models were then derived from these simulations and measurements. Data derived from the 3D simulations, physical measurements and schematic models determine the electrical specifications for the Grypper G4 socket. P2A onfiguration P8A onfiguration Pitches (mm),.25 mm Ball ontact Part Number G S G G G G G S G G G G.4 14468-14.5 14468-14 Pattern 2A Pattern 8A EETRIA SPEIFIATIONS P2A onfiguration.4 mm Pitch*.5 mm Pitch Value Determination Time Delay 11.1 ps 11.5 ps Inverse Fast Fourier transform on the transmission, S21, S-parameter. Short ircuit Inductance.77 nh.87 nh Values are determined by a shortcircuit one-port model at 1. Open ircuit apacitance.183 pf.123 pf Values are determined by a opencircuit one-port model at 1. S21 Insertion oss -1 @ 21.5-1 @ 21.8 Values are based on the 3D model S11 Return oss -1 @ 18-1 @ 1 results, except where verified by -2 @ 4.5-2 @ 2.8 measurements. Impedance 64.9 Ω 74.5 Ω Value calculated from Short ircuit Inductance and Open ircuit apacitance. rosstalk, S41, GSSG Thru -2 @ 5. -2 @ 3.7 Values are based on the 3D model results. * Specification based on lab measurements. www.hsiotech.com 1

EETRIA SPEIFIATIONS ONT... P8A onfiguration.4 mm Pitch.5 mm Pitch Value Determination Time Delay 1. ps 1. ps Inverse Fast Fourier transform on the transmission, S21, S-parameter. Short ircuit Inductance.54 nh.62 nh Values are determined by a shortcircuit one-port model at 1. Open ircuit apacitance.239 pf.22 pf Values are determined by a opencircuit one-port model at 1. S21 Insertion oss -1 @ 27-1 @ 29 Values are based on the 3D model S11 Return oss -1 @ 24-1 @ 25.7 results, except where verified by -2 @ 14-2 @ 12 measurements. Impedance 47.5 Ω 55.3 Ω Value calculated from Short ircuit Inductance and Open ircuit apacitance. RESUTS FOR PATTERN 2A 3D Model Simulations for Pattern 2A Three dimensional EM field simulations were performed using Ansoft s High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS ) software. Measurement ports are located at the contact points on the bottom and bottom of the socket. The model contact and pitch configuration was varied to predict the performance of the socket, obtaining results at both.4 mm and.5 mm. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show results for the GSG 2-port configuration at both.4 mm and.5 mm pitch. Next, the bottom port was deleted and replaced with a perfect short. The low frequency inductance of the configuration was estimated using this one port measurement. Similarly, an open circuit measurement was used to estimate the capacitance of the structure. The impedance value was calculated from these estimated results. Z X Figure 1..4 mm GSG model configuration Frequency Response 1 to 4 Return oss 1 to 4 1..5 2. -1.2 5. -2...2.5 1. 2. 5. -3.4 mm (S21).4 mm (S11).5 mm (S21).5 mm (S11) 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 -.2 -.5-2...5 mm (S11).4 mm (S11) -1. Figure 2. GSG P2A Insertion oss and Return oss Figure 3. GSG P2A Return oss plotted on Smith chart www.hsiotech.com 2

RESUTS FOR PATTERN 2A ONT... Measurements for Pattern 2A ascade Microtech s FP-8 GSG probes were used to obtain the.4 mm socket measurements. To provide a first-order approximation of the socket s performance, the socket was mounted on a small brass plate containing an opening allowing access to the contact area. The plate and socket assembly was then mounted on a positioner and simultaneously probed from both the top and bottom sides. The measured insertion loss is approximately -.8 at 2, slightly lower than the HFSS model s expected value. Insertion oss 1 to 4 Return oss 1 to 4-2 -1-4 -2-6 -8-1 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Figure 4. GSG P2A Insertion oss comparison,.4 mm pitch.4 mm Simulation (S21).4 mm Measurement (S21) -3-4 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Figure 5. GSG P2A Return oss comparison,.4 mm pitch.4 mm Simulation (S21).4 mm Measurement (S21) Return oss 1 to 4 1..5 2..2 5....2.5 1. 2. 5. -.2. Measurement (S11) -.5-2. -1. Figure 6. GSG P2A Return oss comparison plotted on Smith chart,.4 mm pitch www.hsiotech.com 3

RESUTS FOR PATTERN 2A ONT... Schematic Model Agilent s Advanced Design System (ADS) was used to construct a GSG schematic model matching the.4 mm pitch socket measurement results. The topology selected matches that of the three contacts used in the measurement. Ports 1 and 2 represent the device side and PB side of the socket, respectively. The.4 mm pitch GSG schematic model consists of 9 passive components. The signal contact is represented by three series inductors, forming a total pin inductance of.535 nh. Shunt capacitors bridge between the signal contact and the return path contacts. The two return paths are lumped together as two pins in parallel. Shunt capacitance is.129 pf. inductance of 6 ph is added to represent the mutual coupling between the signal and the return paths. 1 =1pH 2 =2pH 3 =3pH + + - Term Term5 Num=1 Z=5 Ohm 1 =.1 ff {t} {o} 2 =44.668 ff {t} {o} 3 =84.44 ff {t} {o} 4 =.1 ff {t} {o} - Term Term6 Num=2 Z=5 Ohm 4 =4pH 1 M=2.98 ph {t} {o} 5 =5pH 2 M=1 ph {t} {o} 6 =6pH 3 M=2.17 ph {t} {o} Var Eqn VAR VAR1 1T=33.746 {t} {o} 2T=37.289 {t} {o} 3T=131.481 {t} {o} Figure 7. GSG P2A Schematic Model,.4mm pitch An additional pair of ports (ports 3 and 4 not shown) were added in the simulation to compare the schematic model to the GSG measurement file. Insertion oss omparison 1 to 4 Return oss omparison 1 to 4-1 -1-2 -2-3 -4 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Figure 8. GSG P2A Insertion oss,.4 mm pitch Schematic Model (S21) Simulation (S21) -3-4 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Figure 9. GSG P2A Return oss,.4 mm pitch Schematic Model (S11) www.hsiotech.com 4

RESUTS FOR PATTERN 2A ONT... Return oss 1 to 4 1..5 2..2 5....2.5 1. 2. 5. -.2. Schematic Model (S11) -.5-2. -1. Figure 1. GSG P2A Return oss plotted on Smith chart,.4 mm pitch RESUTS FOR PATTERN 8A 3D Model Simulations for Pattern 8A Three dimensional EM field simulations were performed using Ansoft s High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS ) software. Measurement ports are located at the contact points on the top, Port 1, and bottom, Port 2, of the socket. This model was updated to reflect the UV cured silicone based adhesive shown in light gray. Z X Y Figure 11..4 mm GSG P8A model configuration Figure 9 and Figure 1 show results for the GSG P8A 2-port configuration at both.4 mm and.5 mm pitch. Frequency Response 1 to 35 Return oss 1 to 35 1..5 2. -1.2 5. -2...2.5 1. 2. 5. -3-4.4 mm (S21).4 mm (S11).5 mm (S21).5 mm (S11) 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 -.2 -.5-2...5 mm (S11).4 mm (S11) -1. Figure 12. GSG P8A Insertion oss and Return oss Figure 13. GSG P8A Return oss plotted on Smith chart www.hsiotech.com 5

RESUTS FOR PATTERN 8A ONT... Measurements for Pattern 8A P8A measurements are not available at this time. Schematic Model for Pattern 8A onfiguration Agilent s Advanced Design System (ADS) was used to construct a GSG schematic model matching the.4 mm pitch socket simulation results. The topology selected matches that of the one signal contact surrounded by eight ground contacts used in the simulation. The GSG schematic model consists of ten passive components. The signal contact is represented along the top by series inductors totaling 38.5 ph series inductor. The eight return paths are joined together in parallel and represented along the bottom series inductors, totaling 48 ph. Shunt capacitors bridge the signal contact and the ground return path. Total capacitance is 114 ff. Finally, an added mutual inductance 23 ph represents the mutual coupling between the two ground contacts and signal. 1 =1pH 2 =2pH 3 =3pH + - Term Term1 Num=1 Z=5 Ohm 1 =52.5 ff {t} {o} 2 =.1 ff {t} {o} 3 =18.88 ff {t} {o} 4 =43. ff {t} {o} + - Term Term2 Num=2 Z=5 Ohm 4 =4pH 1 M=11.64 ph {t} {o} 5 =5pH 2 M=1 ph {t} {o} 6 =6pH 3 M=1.7 ph {t} {o} Var Eqn VAR VAR1 1T=4.97 {t} {o} 2T=311.93 {t} {o} 3T=63.77 {t} {o} 4T=1T/8 5T=2T/8 6T=3T/8 Figure 14. GSG P8A Schematic Model,.4 mm pitch An additional pair of ports (ports 3 and 4, not shown) were added in the simulation to compare the schematic model to the GSG simulation file. Insertion oss omparison 1 to 4 Return oss omparison 1 to 4-1 -1-2 -2-3 -3-4 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Figure 15. GSG P8A Insertion oss,.4 mm pitch Schematic Model (S21) Simulation (S21) -4 Figure 16. GSG P8A Return oss,.4 mm pitch Schematic Model (S11) 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 www.hsiotech.com 6

RESUTS FOR PATTERN 8A ONT... Return oss 1 to 4 1..5 2..2 5....2.5 1. 2. 5. -.2. Schematic Model (S11) -.5-2. -1. GSSG ROSSTAK ANAYSIS Figure 17. GSG P8A Return oss Simulation plotted on Smith chart,.4 mm pitch A 4-Port S-parameter analysis was done to determine the Near End (S21) and Far End (S41) crosstalk. Ball Side 4-Port Network P1 P3 P2 P4 Far End and Near End rosstalk for GSSG at.4 mm Pitch The model was analyzed in HFSS. Z X Figure 18..4 mm GSSG model configuration www.hsiotech.com 7

GSSG ROSSTAK ANAYSIS ONT... Far End and Near End rosstalk for GSSG at a.5 mm Pitch The model was analyzed in HFSS. Z X Figure 19..5 mm GSSG model configuration The Figure 17 plot shows the results for the Grypper G4 with the.4 mm pitch. The -2 Far End crosstalk limit (1% voltage crosstalk) is reached at 5.. The Figure 18 plot shows the results for the Grypper G4 with the.5 mm pitch. The -2 Far End crosstalk limit (1% voltage crosstalk) is reached at 3.7. rosstalk Response 1 to 4 rosstalk Response 1 to 4-1 -1-2 -2-3 -3-4 (S21) (S41) 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4-4 (S21) (S41) 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Figure 2. GSSG rosstalk Response,.4 mm pitch Figure 21. GSSG rosstalk Response,.5 mm pitch opyright 212 HSIO Technologies, / All rights reserved / Data subject to change without notice HSIO Technologies, / 133 67th Avenue North, Maple Grove, MN 55311 USA +1.763.447.626 / Sales@HSIOTech.com / www.hsiotech.com G4 1_13 72-1G