SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE MACEDONIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND POLICY

Similar documents
Commission on science and Technology for Development. Ninth Session Geneva, May2006

CHALLENGES FOR INNOVATION- BASED COMPETITIVENESS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. Anna Kaderabkova Centre for Economic Studies VŠEM

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

Higher Education for Science, Technology and Innovation. Accelerating Africa s Aspirations. Communique. Kigali, Rwanda.

COMPETITIVNESS, INNOVATION AND GROWTH: THE CASE OF MACEDONIA

FINANCING OF THE INNOVATIONS COMPETITIVENESS OF THE COMPANIES AND THE NATIONAL ECONOMY

Economic and Social Council

The Public Agency for Technology of the Republic of Slovenia

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

Werner Wobbe. Employed at the European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation

Key features in innovation policycomparison. Dr Gudrun Rumpf Kyiv, 9 November, 2010

Fostering SME innovation through cross-border cooperation

ASEAN Open Innovation Forum 14 October 2017 Nay Pyi Taw

Science, Technology and Innovation for the MDGs and the Post-2015 Development Agenda

Introduction Closing the innovation gap in the Adriatic Region: the legacy of PACINNO

MEDLAB Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. Panagiotis Georgopoulos Region of Central Macedonia

RIO Country Report 2015: Lithuania

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

Sustainable Development Education, Research and Innovation

Country Profile: Israel

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

BSSSC Annual Conference Resolution 2016

Regional innovation strategies: the Apulian experience and the role of ARTI, the Regional Agency for Technology and Innovation

VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES. KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY BAROMETER Mika Naumanen Technology Studies VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era

Innovation in Europe: Where s it going? How does it happen? Stephen Roper Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS. Dr. Agnes Spilioti Head of R&DI Policy Planning Directorate

Dynamics of National Systems of Innovation in Developing Countries and Transition Economies. Jean-Luc Bernard UNIDO Representative in Iran

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

REGIONAL WORKSHOP THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) AND THE VALORISATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Creative Industries: The Next Phase

CRETE: Towards a RIS3 strategy. Heraklion, Crete, September 2013 ARTEMIS SAITAKIS DIRECTOR SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARK OF CRETE

Pacts for Europe 2020: Good Practices and Views from EU Cities and Regions

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

BASED ECONOMIES. Nicholas S. Vonortas

National Innovation Systems: Implications for Policy and Practice. Dr. James Cunningham Director. Centre for Innovation and Structural Change

OECD-INADEM Workshop on

HOW TO BUILD AN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM?

THESIS PRESENTATION. Gabriele Goebel-Heise 5617A011-4

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

ITALY: SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION WITH CHINA

Providing innovational activity of enterprises of the real sector of the economy

TRANSFORMATION INTO A KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY: THE MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE

WIPO Development Agenda

MSMES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE SDG AGENDA

Programme. Social Economy. in Västra Götaland Adopted on 19 June 2012 by the regional board, Region Västra Götaland

Seoul Initiative on the 4 th Industrial Revolution

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Beyond the Disruptive Innovation Trap

Main lessons learned from the German national innovation system

Framework conditions, innovation policies and instruments: Lessons Learned

Technology and Industry Outlook Country Studies and Outlook Division (DSTI/CSO)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Service Science: A Key Driver of 21st Century Prosperity

Role of Knowledge Economics as a Driving Force in Global World

Marie Skłodowska- Curie Actions under Horizon2020

Original: English Rio de Janeiro, Brazil June 2012

New Paradigm of Korean Economy: To be More Creative and Innovative

FEASIBILITY STUDY OF NATIONAL INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PROGRAM

The Riga Declaration on e-skills A call to action on digital skills and job creation in Europe

Situation awareness for SME renaissance. Technical University of Košice Slovak Republic

RIS3 from Strategic Orientations towards Policy Implementation: The Challenges Claire NAUWELAERS Independent expert in STI policy

Building an enterprise-centred innovation system

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Support R&D and Innovation in Portugal 2020

Knowledge transfer and IP management at universities and public research organisations in Serbia

Green Paper - From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework. for EU Research and Innovation Funding

DELIVERABLE SEPE Exploitation Plan

FINLAND. The use of different types of policy instruments; and/or Attention or support given to particular S&T policy areas.

ENTREPRENEURIAL FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS FOR THE SME DEVELOPMENT IN SERBIA * 9. Abstract

Country Profile: Finland

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE, TECNOLOGY, AND INNOVATION IN UKRAINE Oleg Khymenko

Course 1.1 Introduction to Innovation: Role of STI for Growth and Sustainable Development UN-Wide Capacity Building Workshop on Technology for

ÓBIDOS CHARTER A PACT FOR CREATIVITY

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

Vietnam s Innovation System: Toward a Product Innovation Ecosystem.

Kazakhstan Way of Innovation Clusterization K. Mukhtarova Al-Farabi Kazak National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Spain: Industria Conectada 4.0

Production research at European level supports regions and SMEs

High Level Seminar on the Creative Economy and Copyright as Pathways to Sustainable Development. UN-ESCAP/ WIPO, Bangkok December 6, 2017

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

The Internationalization of R&D in India: Opportunities and Challenges. Rajeev Anantaram National Interest Project March 2009

Сonceptual framework and toolbox for digital transformation of industry of the Eurasian Economic Union

Country Profile: Denmark

SPEECH BY DEPUTY MINISTER OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HON. CHIKUMBUTSO HIWA, M.P.

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

Challenges for the New Cohesion Policy nd joint EU Cohesion Policy Conference

SME POLICY INDEX EASTERN PARTNER COUNTRIES. Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe. Country dissemination event

)XWXUH FKDOOHQJHV IRU WKH WRXULVP VHFWRU

IGC South Asia Regional Conference. Ijaz Nabi March 18, 2014 Avari Hotel, Lahore

The United Arab Emirates is ranked 38th in the GII 2018, dropping 3 positions from last year.

Research and innovation strategies for smart specialization

Country Profile: Cyprus

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2008: Highlights

DIRECTION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICY IN THAILAND

Finnish STI Policy

SME support under Horizon 2020 Diana GROZAV Horizon 2020 SME NCP Center of International Projects

Low carbon technology challenges for major developing countries

Addressing STI Challenges of the Gambia. Dr. S.T.K Naim Consultant COMSTECH

Transcription:

SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE MACEDONIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND POLICY Slavica Rocheska; Marjan Angeleski Olivera Kostoska; Gjorgji Mancheski Faculty of Economics Prilep, Macedonia

Introduction 1/2 Development of science, technology and innovation in the Republic of Macedonia is to be a basic precondition aimed at fostering the economic growth, competitiveness and employment. Macroeconomic indicators clearly point towards an unfavorable structural performance of the Macedonian economy, among the others, due to the insufficient investment to encourage the technological development and innovations. The country accounts for an extremely low figures of gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD). Thus, funds allocated on R&D have recorded a decreasing tendency for the period 2000-2008 (0,44% and 0,23%, respectively). Moreover, GERD accounted for merely 0,20% of GDP in 2009 and this certainly placed the country at the bottom of the European list.

Introduction 2/2 The business sector in Macedonia is generally composed of small and medium enterprises that account for more than 98% of totals and absorb the above 53% of the total number of employees. Nevertheless, SMEs exhibit a limited ability to finance the research activities and develop their own technology base (the funds allocated to research and development in 2007 accounted for merely 0,04% of GDP BERD). Industry-academia relations are very weak, the research activities are being much fragmented, while the market-oriented research is rather unusual. One of the basic assumptions to overcome such a situation is the possibility to create the strategic platform that will clearly define the directions of innovation development and implementation of policies aimed at strengthening the innovation capabilities of the economy as a whole.

Strengths Educated and relatively cheap labor force Willingness of the academic institutions to closely cooperate with the business community Increased Government initiatives and willingness to support innovation Good ICT infrastructure in the country Open economy stimulating trade and FDI

Weaknesses 1/2 Insufficient coordination of STI policy makers and lack of institutions networking Supply-side oriented innovation policies Innovation culture is rather low No national innovation strategy Low awareness level and lack of interest about the protection of intellectual properties Low expenditures in R&D

Outdated technology in many industries and persistent technological lag Weaknesses 2/2 Lack of educational contents and programs aimed at promoting quality, creativity and innovations Inadequate skills and competences of the employees Deficient structural mobility of the researchers Deficient commercialization of the research results Lack of the project sustainability related to innovation after implementing the program activities Rules and regulations are frequently changed

Opportunities 1/2 Approximation of the national legislation to the EU law Possibilities to support innovations by different international programmes and instruments Adoption of a national innovation strategy Rising awareness for innovation development and creating innovation culture Improving the financial instruments to support R&D

Opportunities 2/2 Rising skills and competences owing to reforms in educational process Increasing the cooperation between the business and academic community Pro-active policy for attracting FDI Exploring the possibilities of open innovation Policy learning from more advanced countries

Threats Prolonging the accession to the EU Brain Drain Consequences of the global economic crisis Political issues in the region

Taking into consideration the level of the country s development and the relatively modest financial resources, the policy makers are required to incorporate a mix of measures and instruments with the emphasis not only on radical innovations, but primarily to develop the absorptive capacities of domestic companies, attract more FDI, stimulate the entrepreneurship and encourage the incremental improvements in the business processes. Conclusions It is more than necessary for the Macedonian economy to build its developing prospects upon the promotion of knowledge and innovations. During the last few years, the Government has captured a proactive approach to promote the science, technology and innovation. The policy incorporates a number of measures having a dispersive range. Yet, the problems persist in the lack of an integrated approach and insufficient coordination while implementing the measures. The new strategic framework is supposed to encourage the policies that will provide for efficient mobilization of the resources available and setting up partnerships and links among all the relevant stakeholders so as to proper implementing the concept of innovation.