Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions

Similar documents
MINERVA: IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL CULTURAL HERITAGE IN EUROPE. Rossella Caffo - Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali, Italia

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

The main FP7 instruments. Aurélien Saffroy. 6 Dec

COST FP9 Position Paper

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

EUROPEAN GNSS APPLICATIONS IN H2020

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

ClusterNanoRoad

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS IN FOSTERING EXPLOITATION. Josef Mikulík Transport Research Centre - CDV

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

An introduction to the 7 th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. Gorgias Garofalakis

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

ASD EUROSPACE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (SRTC)

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

European Technology Platforms

Information Society Technologies in the 6th Framework Programme. Tom Bo Clausen Project Officer European Commission, IST programme Embedded Systems

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Science2Society Boosting innovation efficiency across Europe

PROJECT FINAL REPORT Publishable Summary

EeB-CA² Training: Innovation Management. Agenda. 15th June, 2016, Brussels, Belgium

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Exploring emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European cities

FET Open in Horizon Roumen Borissov Scientific/Technical Project Officer Future and Emerging Technologies, DG CONNECT European Commission

Performance evaluation and benchmarking in EU-funded activities. ICRA May 2011

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

ccess to Cultural Heritage Networks Across Europe

Text Text. Cristian Matti 1,2, Irene Vivas 1,3, Julia Panny 1 and Blanca JuanAgullo 1. EIT Climate-KIC, 2 Utrecht University 3 Maastricht University

Introducing the 7 th Community Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development ( ) 2013)

ARTEMIS Industry Association

Horizon 2020 and CAP towards 2020

Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA

Research Development Request - Profile Template. European Commission

FET Flagships in Horizon 2020

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the evaluation of Europeana and the way forward. {SWD(2018) 398 final}

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Production research at European level supports regions and SMEs

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

OSRA Overarching Strategic Research Agenda and CapTech SRAs Harmonisation. Connecting R&T and Capability Development

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

European Commission. 6 th Framework Programme Anticipating scientific and technological needs NEST. New and Emerging Science and Technology

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT STRATEGY FOR EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS: ETP 2020

National Technology Platforms Best practices & future prospects

Using Foresight and Scenarios for Anticipation of Skill Needs

WhyisForesight Important for Europe?

A4BLUE - Adaptive Automation in Assembly For BLUE collar workers satisfaction in Evolvable context

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

BSSSC Annual Conference Resolution 2016

EuropeAid. Sustainable and Cleaner Production in the Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan (SCI-Pak)

Pre-commercial procurement in robotics HORIZON ICT 27(d)

INVESTMENTS FOR SMART AND SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS FOR COMPETITIVE BLUE GROWTH IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION. Warnemünde, 28 th of September 2016

D.2.2 Concept and methodology for ICT Fora

Zeinab El-Sadr Ministry of Scientific Research, Egypt CAASTNet Stakeholders Meeting, Dakar Senegal 25 th April 2012

SASAR POSITION PAPER ON: GREEN PAPER ON A COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE EU RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING

Presentation of the results. Niels Gøtke, Chair of the expert group and Effie Amanatidou, Rapporteur

FP9 s ambitious aims for societal impact call for a step change in interdisciplinarity and citizen engagement.

The role and practicalities of standardization in Horizon 2020

A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

Exascale-related EC activities

Journée d Information sur les futurs appels à proposition, Lille, le 18 avril ème PCRD - Priorité Transports de Surface Durables

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies Space

HORIZON Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (LEIT)

SETTING FOOD SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR HORIZON EUROPE. Marta Hugas EFSA Chief Scientist

An Introdcution to Horizon 2020

MERIL MAPPING OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE LANDSCAPE

agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie Agency for Innovation through Science en Technology Hendrik De Bondt, Elsie De Clercq

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

Value driven processes

Access to Research Infrastructures under Horizon 2020 and beyond

Promoting European clean technologies in India & tackling climate change 1

RegionArts - overview, methodology and outputs

Belgian Position Paper

Digital Innovation Hubs & Smart Specialisation

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

EC-Egypt Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement. Road Map

DoReMi-MELODI Training and Education Forum Introduction and background

Wind Energy Technology Roadmap

EurOCEAN The Galway Declaration

WIPO Development Agenda

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

PROJECT FACT SHEET GREEK-GERMANY CO-FUNDED PROJECT. project proposal to the funding measure

GALILEO Research and Development Activities. Second Call. Area 1A. Statement of Work

July REFLECTIONS ON FP8 (non - paper)

Second MyOcean User Workshop 9-10 April 2013, Copenhagen Main outcomes

4th BioHorizon International Brokerage Event 26 th of June Fare clic per modificare lo stile del titolo

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Fistera Delphi Austria

Table Of Content. Stichting Health Action International... 2 Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners... 6 Outputs...

Opportunità per i ricercatori SSH in Horizon Monique Longo

STRUCTURE OF THE H2020 PROPOSAL, TYPES OF ACTIONS, TLR. Summer School for Young Researchers, September 2017, Odessa

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

Report on the Results of. Questionnaire 1

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

Common evaluation criteria for evaluating proposals

6. Introduce a Single Information Single Audit system for all types of ERA instruments.

Transcription:

Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions AIMS 3rd Newsletter August 2010 About AIMS The project AIMS is a co-ordination and support action under the 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission. The consortium consists of eight partners from six different countries. The project partners cover a broad range of expertise in the field of transport and logistics research. Several projects (FP5, FP6 and FP7) from all transport modes namely road, rail, air, maritime or inland waterways, and intermodal are being analyzed and evaluated. An advanced evaluation methodology for the analyses of the impacts from research activities within freight transport will be developed. AIMS has an overall duration of 23 months and is being finished at 31 st of July 2010. The AIMS Final conference took place at 16 th of June 2010 at the HUSA Hotel in Brussels. More details on this event can be found at the end of this Newsletter. Core approach of AIMS AIMS is relying on an innovative approach combining a systemic approach and a socioeconomic approach: the TST approach (for Techniques, Society and Territories). It permits a coherent grasping of the real impacts that shall be analysed further on, per innovation and axis of RTD envisaged. It allows highlighting both the advantages and disadvantages or difficulties in implementing innovative concepts when faced with the current market situation and the rigidities of society. Essential part of the works was the integration of stakeholders, different perspectives and requirements from industry. This has been done through the involvement of dedicated Experts, contact to relevant councils, research agendas and other interest groups. At the end of the project work, the analyses and especially the discussions with experts on the Framework programs, the different projects and initiatives in the transport modes lead to interesting results and experiences. In general the various research programs are being seen as an important instrument to foster European technological developments and knowledge generation. Yet, some improvements of the programs, the project selection and the administrative processes can be seen. Following you find a very short abstract about the core results out of AIMS. It summarizes the different results from the Work packages (past experiences evaluation FP5/6; diagnosis of the present FP7; assumptions on the future). Basic TST diagram 1

Results & Conclusions WP2 Past experiences evaluation Based on a defined and reviewed selection process, 30 FP5/6 projects related to freight transport have been analysed in detail. For each transport mode and intermodal 5 projects have been considered. The process of analyses included desktop research of available documents and personal interviews with project coordinators and partners (if available). TST models have been built for each of these projects as well as for transport mode level. Following diagram shows an example of a project related TST model. This is an outcome of one step of the analyses of FP5/6 projects. New OPERA project TST model, source: ETH, D2.1 As already outlined in the last Newsletter, a first version of the evaluation methodology refers to the different stages of a project - initialization, realisation and project follow-up. The following table shows the macro-criteria results and post-project activities, the allocated micro-criteria and the corresponding specification. Criteria and specification 2

WP3 Diagnosis of the current situation Using the same TST approach as in WP2, 15 FP7 projects have been selected for deeper analyses. Taking into account that some of these projects have not been finished yet the assessment of project results was not possible. Still the projects should represent an actual picture of the recent research initiatives ongoing in the current FP. Analyses of the offer (Research projects) and demand side (industry and stakeholders) have been made. Important parts of the methodology were again personal interviews with stakeholders from different areas. Within the analyses process intermediate performance targets for current research projects in freight transport have been elaborated. This framework can be used as basis for further evaluations and review processes. The picture below shows an excerpt of the table covering all modes and criteria: Intermediate performance target matrix (excerpt) related to intermodal WP4 Assumptions on the future In a vision for 2030 it is assumed that the European transport system is sustainable, safe, secure, productive, profitable and provides high quality services. To support this vision, a transport research organisation has been defined; it is structured around: Domains: the transport research and innovation efforts embrace the equipments, the infrastructure, and the operation & service domains; Cross enablers: these are the issues / techniques of major importance to enable the transport system vision and associated research developments; they are coming from the Techniques sub-system and concern the communication (marketing, dissemination, actors awareness), the education and training, the Intellectual Property Right, the policy, the homologation and the financing scheme; Drivers: the drivers which have been identified for the transport industry deal with productivity, profitability, quality, sustainability (including environmental and social aspects), and safety and security. Cross-enablers are required to drive the innovation process before, during (from specification to on-site test) and after (implementation). This relates to: IPR protection, main issues relying to SME and international protection. Communication e.g. improved promotion and awareness of transport activities. Education and training e.g. a EU regions transport school, a passport of skill and 3

competencies relying on a process to guide worker all along his career. Policy e.g. harmonisation of the security policy framework. Homologation e.g. standardised transport indicators, logistics quality goal, and environmental benchmark. Financing scheme e.g. specific founding for SME, new funding to help innovation in the scope of their industrialisation and/or commercialisation. On the one hand, AIMS vision for 2030 is ambitious: the transport system is a complex assembly; it gathers a multiplicity of actors, covers a large variety of operational issues and has to integrate the different transport modes visions. Various innovations are needed to reach the targeted objectives in terms of productivity, profitability, service quality, sustainability, safety or security. On the other hand, transport research is a complex matter, integrating different issues, often interconnected, and necessitating various scientific corpuses to address them. Therefore, a precise organisation is required to drive the innovation effort in the most comprehensive way. And if research is crucial, above all synergies are needed between research and business sides as well as collaboration between Technology Platforms (TPs) and Advisory Councils (ACs), in order to maximize chance for research success, around a common interest: the development of the research answering the transport industry needs. Cross enablers, drivers, domains Final conclusions and recommendations have been drawn and summarized within WP5 activities. These results will be core part of the AIMS Final handbook. The AIMS handbook will also contain mode related contributions by the Experts group. 4

AIMS Final Conference June 16 th 2010 The AIMS Final conference took place at 16th of June 2010 in Brussels, Hotel Husa President Park. Main objectives of the event were to present key results from the research activities regarding the six different transport modes, to summarize the overall results from the experts point of view as well as to discuss the methodology and experiences from the project works. The project officer from the European Commission gave an interesting overview about the current FP7 midterm evaluation initiative which will consider different results from the cluster evaluation projects. In the following discussion statements on the specific situation in the transport modes and the different application of the TST approach and some important recommendations were exchanged. 5

AIMS contact details: AIMS Project Secretariat Ms. Clarissa Strasser PTV AG, Stumpfstr. 1, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.no. : +49 721 9651 7288 Mail : clarissa.strasser@ptv.de www.aims-project.net The AIMS Consortium ICES 6