Knowledge transfer and IP management at universities and public research organisations in Serbia

Similar documents
ERAWATCH Country Reports 2012: Serbia

Consultancy on Technological Foresight

SME support under Horizon 2020 Diana GROZAV Horizon 2020 SME NCP Center of International Projects

University Technology Transfer, Innovation Ecosystem and EIE Project

DANUBE INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

FINLAND. The use of different types of policy instruments; and/or Attention or support given to particular S&T policy areas.

IP and Technology Management for Universities

Ministry of. Economic Development

INTEGRATING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTO INNOVATION POLICY FORMULATION IN SERBIA

Introduction to HSE ISSEK

Co-funded by the I Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR A FUTURE SOCIETY FOR A FUTURE SOCIETY

Commission on science and Technology for Development. Ninth Session Geneva, May2006

TRANSFORMATION INTO A KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY: THE MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE

The Public Agency for Technology of the Republic of Slovenia

COSME Financial Perspectives European programmes and funds to foster growth Madrid 30 October/Seville 31 October 2013

Vietnam s Innovation System: Toward a Product Innovation Ecosystem.

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: Challenges, Opportunities and Successful Cases. Phan Quoc Nguyen

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Regional innovation strategies: the Apulian experience and the role of ARTI, the Regional Agency for Technology and Innovation

University IP and Technology Management. University IP and Technology Management

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX LFM

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets: Country Experience

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE MACEDONIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND POLICY

MEASURES TO SUPPORT SMEs IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Globalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries

CERN-PH-ADO-MN For Internal Discussion. ATTRACT Initiative. Markus Nordberg Marzio Nessi

REGIONAL WORKSHOP THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) AND THE VALORISATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

RESEARCH FOR INNOVATION

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

SMART SPECIALIZATION PROCESS: THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA SERGIU PORCESCU JRC NCP KNOWLEDGE HUB MOLDOVA

National Innovation System of Mongolia

Сonceptual framework and toolbox for digital transformation of industry of the Eurasian Economic Union

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

Main lessons learned from the German national innovation system

Working with SMEs on projects

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

National Innovation Systems: Implications for Policy and Practice. Dr. James Cunningham Director. Centre for Innovation and Structural Change

ENTREPRENEURIAL FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS FOR THE SME DEVELOPMENT IN SERBIA * 9. Abstract

WIPO Development Agenda

CHALLENGES FOR INNOVATION- BASED COMPETITIVENESS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. Anna Kaderabkova Centre for Economic Studies VŠEM

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets:

Fostering SME innovation through cross-border cooperation

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

UB DRUSSA Experience and Lessons

High Level Seminar on the Creative Economy and Copyright as Pathways to Sustainable Development. UN-ESCAP/ WIPO, Bangkok December 6, 2017

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Development UNESCO s Perspective

The TTO circle workshop on "Technology Transfer in Nanotechnology"

Framework conditions, innovation policies and instruments: Lessons Learned

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or

Studying the Role of Public Research Organisations

The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages

ASEAN Open Innovation Forum 14 October 2017 Nay Pyi Taw

The Enterprise Europe Network. in Hungary Zita Majoros, Consultant. Title. Sub-title. 28 th January, Kiev, Ukraine

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

EUREKA in the ERA INTRODUCTION

The transfer of S3 from the EU to Ukraine challenges and recommendations*

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

Consultation on the Effectiveness of Innovation Support in Europe

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

Public Research and Intellectual Property Rights

KICK-OFF EVENT: A STREAM OF COOPERATION. Improve framework conditions for innovation

Country Profile: Israel

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

Support for Universities and R&D institutions

IP support and IP strategy development in the Austrian innovation system plus a brief look at Switzerland and Ireland

Providing innovational activity of enterprises of the real sector of the economy

SESSION 2 GOOD PRACTICES FOR ACCELERATING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ATING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION GOOD PRACTICES FOR ACCELER-

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

Catapult Network Summary

OECD Innovation Strategy: Key Findings

BUILDING CAPACITIES: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING AND SME SKILLS

Key features in innovation policycomparison. Dr Gudrun Rumpf Kyiv, 9 November, 2010

PROMOTING QUALITY AND STANDARDS

CRETE: Towards a RIS3 strategy. Heraklion, Crete, September 2013 ARTEMIS SAITAKIS DIRECTOR SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY PARK OF CRETE

Report of Visit to Agency ANI Portugal. Lisbon, 2 May 2016

UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE BRIDGING INNOVATION. wwwcria.pt

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

Getting Started. This Lecture

Nektarios Tavernarakis Chairman of the Board, FORTH Professor, Medical School University of Crete

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS. Dr. Agnes Spilioti Head of R&DI Policy Planning Directorate

The actors in the research system are led by the following principles:

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) of 9 March 2005

The Intellectual Property, Knowledge Transfer: Perspectives

THESIS PRESENTATION. Gabriele Goebel-Heise 5617A011-4

STATE ADVANCED MANUFACTURING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS. As at February 2018

Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe SME DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF GEORGIA

Research goals and funding opportunities Unit Development of Digital Technologies BMWi VI B4 Celtic plus Proposers Day

Innovation in EU Policy Innovation concepts and innovation policy

Transcription:

Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 Expert workshop Tirana, 13 June 2012 Knowledge transfer and IP management at universities and public research organisations in Serbia An event on behalf of the European Commission Djuro Kutlaca Mihajlo Pupin Institute

Key facts Figure 1: Overview of Serbia s research system governance structure Legend: Political Level: CSTD Committee for S&T development MES Ministry of Education and Science NCSTD-National Council for S&T Development Operational Level: OIPR Office for Intellectual Property Rights OS Office for Standardization OMPM Office for Measurements and Precious Metals QCA Quality Certification Agencies CC Chambers of Commerce AB Accreditation Board SB S&T Boards CSP Committee for Scientific Promotion MoERD Ministry of Economy and Regional Development IF Innovation Fund NARD National Agency for the Regional Development Innovation Performers: SMEs Small and Medium Sized Companies IC Innovation Centres BTI-Business and Technological Incubators STP S&T Parks FA Foreign Agencies for support of Technological Development ITA IT and Internet Agency NARD National Agency for the Regional Development IF Innovation Fund Research Performers: HE-PuU Higher Education, Public Universities PROs-SI Public Research Organisations Scientific Institutes BEs Big Enterprises Ent Entrepreneurs Inv Inventors NTBF New Technology Based Firms Source: ERAWATCH Research Inventory PROs-RI Public Research Organisations Research Institutes RDI R&D Infrastructures SASA-Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts HE-PuU Higher Education, Private Universities PrRO Private Research Organisations CI Corporate Institutes Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 2

Key facts Political Authorities Administrative bodies Intermediary Organisations and funding agencies Research performers Innovation Centres Office for Intellectual Property Rights 7 National Univ ersities: 89+ Faculties Figure 2: Serbia s Research and Innovation system Houses of Parli a- ment Committee for S&T development Government Ministry of Science and Technological Development Technological Incubators S&T Parks IT and Internet Agency Private sector- R&D Performers: Multinational Companies Agencies for SME s and Entrepreneurs Small and Medium Enterprises Office for Standardization Office for Measurements and Precious Metals Quality certification agencies Chambers of Commerce For ei gn Agencies for support of Tech nological and Economical Development: EAR, USAID, GTZ, CIDA 10 Private Universities: 60+ private faculties Academy of Sciences: 10 Institutes Scientific Institutes: 28 + 2 Centres of excellence R&D Institutes: 31 + 79 Innovation Centres + 5 supporti ng organizations R&D Infrastructure: - INTERNET (Academic Network) - Gene Bank - Accelerator - S&T Libraries - Kobson Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 3

Key facts - Knowledge transfer infrastructure R&D and Innovation organisations Register MES: Register of scientific institutes registered 27, Register of research development institutes registered 28, Register of faculties (suitable for R&D activities) 75, Register of innovative organizations registered 102, Register of individuals innovators registered 152. Knowledge transfer infrastructure WBC-INCO.net project register (June 2011): Technology / Innovation Centres 5, Clusters 31, Technology and Science Parks 5, Business start-u centres / Technology incubators 18, Technology Transfer Offices 2. Knowledge transfer infrastructure Others: Technology Transfer Offices 2, Enterprise Europe Network 6 partners, Programmes, Projects, Funding Agencies etc. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 4

Key facts - Knowledge (transfer) performance 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 1348 1022 1336 982 1625 1001 1664 1145 2099 1406 2493 1605 2550 1746 3452 2320 4034 2759 4637 3057 4741 3614 Figure 3: Number of articles published in WoS journals, authors from Serbia, 2000-2010 500 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 All articles Scientific articles Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 5 Year

Key facts - Knowledge (transfer) performance 600 500 400 300 Figure 4: Resident patent applications and grants in Serbia, 1994-2010 200 100 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Applications Grants Year Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 6

Key facts - Knowledge (transfer) performance The main results which should be achieved in national R&D projects financed by the Ministry in charge of the science and technological development within technology development programme are socalled technical solutions, patents, pilot technological facilities, new innovations, technological upgrades and other technological solutions that can be directly applied in industry and services. In the period 2003-2007, MSTD has collected reports of the implementation of over 3,400 technical / technological solutions / results within the technological development programme financed by the MSTD in Serbia. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 7

Key facts KT STRENGHTS Strengths: Soaring tendency, in terms of key research indicators in Serbia: Increasing tendency of GERD; Increasing tendency of business sector R&D investments; Increasing share of funding for R&D from abroad; Increasing number of researchers; Rising number of papers on the SCI list and the number of citation; Adopted institutional framework: High Education Law ( Entrepreneurial university ); Innovation Law (support for entrepreneurship); IPR law (fully in accordance with international practice; Serbia has become the member of the EPO in 2010); First 2 TTOs established in Novi Sad and Belgrade; Appearance of spin-off companies within university environment! Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 8

Key facts KT WEAKNESSES Weaknesses: The still present linear model of governance of the R&D and innovation system in the country is the main obstacle to the networking of R&D sector with the rest of economy and society; Missing key policy documents: Innovation strategy / policy; Policy for transformation / restructuring of R&D system; Lack of entrepreneurial behaviour in academic sector; Insufficient incentives for commercialisation of R&D results; Legal requirements for career advancement in R&D sector promote R rather than D activities; Low level of patenting culture; Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 9

IPR - the level of strategy development for intellectual property protection and KT at universities and PROs as well as related barriers July 15, 2011: The Government of the Republic of Serbia has adopted the STRATEGY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT for the period 2011-2015 Planned measures: I. Establish Technology Transfer Centres at least on two state universities II. Elaborate models of contracts regulating relationships in the projects of cooperation between universities or scientific and development organizations and economy VII. Continue and support the existing competition for the best technological innovation of the year XI. Support the introduction of subject matter on the basis of intellectual property at the technical, economic, agricultural and management faculties and art colleges XII. Connect Education and Information Centre of the Office with the universities, other educational institutions, scientific and development organizations and chambers of commerce for the sake of coordinating educational activities in the field of intellectual property Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 10

IPR - the level of strategy development for intellectual property protection and KT at universities and PROs as well as related barriers The legal framework for the protection of intellectual property rights in Serbia is complete and fully in accordance with international recommendations and practice. The Republic of Serbia has become the member of the European Patent Organization (EPO) on October 1, 2010. The University of Novi Sad has established the first Intellectual Property Liaison Office in a Serbian university, in cooperation with the national Intellectual Property Office (IPO) in 2008. Agreement on the support of the IPR Office to the University of Belgrade and the foundation and work of the Technology Transfer Centre was signed in November 30, 2010. The Centre is established by the decision of the University Council from October 26, 2010, in the purposes of identification, protection and commercialization of the results of research work of professors, researchers and students, and protection of IPR. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 11

IPR - the level of strategy development for intellectual property protection and KT at universities and PROs as well as related barriers Barriers: Separation between R&D sector and the economy; Lack of entrepreneurial behaviour in academic sector; Insufficient incentives for commercialisation of R&D results; Legal requirements for career advancement in R&D sector promote R rather than D activities; Low level of patenting culture; Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 12

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Strategy of S&T Development of the Republic of Serbia 2010Strategy of S&T Vision of the development of the Serbia in XXI century: Knowledge Based Society and Economy The Republic of Serbia as an innovative country, where scientists attain European standards, contribute to society s overall level of knowledge and advance the technological development of the economy. Ministry of Education and Science Objective: National Innovation System: The ultimate objective is to create a system that fosters strong national innovation Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 13

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Strategic Vision The development of an Entrepreneurial Economy, based on knowledge and innovativeness, which creates strong, competitive and export oriented SME sector and sustainability contributes to an increase in living standards in the Republic of Serbia. Ministry of Economy and Regional Development The Strategy is based on five pillars, further developed in modules and measures, corresponding to the priorities in SME development and aimed to contribute to improving the performance of the entrepreneurs through all stages of start-up, growth and development of SMEs: Pillar 1 deals with potential entrepreneurs, the conditions for establishing a start up and encouraging micro enterprises development within the SME sector. Pillars 2-4 define specific types of support to SMEs for growth and development, i.e. for transformation of micro into small and small into medium-sized enterprises. Pillar 5 is targeted at improving general business environment, whatever the size of the enterprise. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 14

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Current and planned Serbian policies for KT development at universities and PROs: The Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia 2010-2015 (SSTDRS), adopted by the Government of the Republic of Serbia on February 25, 2010, defined seven national priorities in the domain of S&T and proposed institutional funding on a reasonable minimum level, only for minimum share of maintenance costs of a few government owned R&D organisations. The restructuring of the public R&D system together with harmonised efforts toward recognition and integration of the business R&D sector into the national innovation system is key objective of government strategy for S&T development of the Republic of Serbia until 2015. Innovation law [ Law on Innovation Activities, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", no. 110/2005 and 18/2010] supports cooperation between PROs and SMEs. The recently adopted S&T Strategy and the latest public call for new R&D projects for the 2011-2014 period also support (and awards, in financial terms) cooperation between PROs and SMEs. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 15

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Current and planned Serbian policies for KT development at universities and PROs: A crucial step forward in order to create an environment which supports technological entrepreneurship in Higher Education Sector (HES) and public R&D laboratories and institutes are changes in HE law and innovation law to help stimulate creation of university and PROs spin-offs. The best practice case and recommended example of public-private knowledge transfer model is the (public) University of Novi Sad with more than 68 spin-off companies created within last the 5-6 years. The University of Novi Sad has established the first Intellectual Property Liaison Office in a Serbian university, in cooperation with the national Intellectual Property Office (IPO). An agreement on the support for the Intellectual Property Office to the University of Belgrade and on the foundation and objectives of the Technology Transfer Centre was signed in November 2010. The centre was established by the decision of the University Council from October 26, 2010, with the purpose of identification, protection and commercialization of the results of research work of professors, researchers and students, and the protection of intellectual property. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 16

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Current and planned Serbian policies for KT development at universities and PROs: Several Innovation Centres (IC) and Business and Technology Incubators (BTI) are formed within public universities and large PROs, as the main institutions devoted to the transfer of R&D results into marketable products and services. In addition, several S&T parks are part of research infrastructure initiative for the period 2011-2015, within public universities in Novi Sad and Nis and around the Mihajlo Pupin Institute as the core PROs for the S&T Park Zvezdara in Belgrade. Creation of a knowledge-based economy through the construction of S&T parks in Belgrade, Novi Sad, Niš and Kragujevac (an approximately 30 million EUR investment) is one of the key elements of R&D policy for the immediate future which promotes the diversification of sources of finance for scientific projects through better cooperation with business partners. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 17

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Assessment of these policies: There are no official mechanisms for monitoring and reviewing progress made by national public research organisations in knowledge transfer activities in Serbia. Nevertheless, reporting on such activities is obligatory part of accreditation documentation for institutes and faculties (every four years) [under the label: "Efficiency and effectiveness of the results of scientific research activities/ valorisation and market commercialization through knowledge and technology transfer"]. In addition, annual reports on realisation of the R&D projects (co)financed by the MES regularly consist request for information concerning knowledge transfer activities organised and performed by the research teams. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 18

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Assessment of these policies: The new Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia 2010-2015 has proposed establishment of a strict implementation tracking system, i.e. the implementation of the Strategy shall be monitored by the Ministry in charge of science and technology development, together with the Ministry of education, Ministry of economy and other ministries, the National Council of science and technology, National council of higher education, Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences, other advisory bodies and representatives of local and international companies. The SSTDRS has mentioned as subject of monitoring in particular: "Program of knowledge transfer, which should enable the development and operation of centres for transfer of know-how and networking, organization of training courses for new technologies, incentives for feasibility studies of introduction to specific industries (in cooperation with the Fund for research and technology, banks and the Fund for development)." Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 19

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Challenges of knowledge transfer in Serbia: The absence of coordinated governance and funding of national innovation system in Serbia between main ministries and public funding sources as a consequence of the fact that the concept, purpose and functioning of innovation is not sufficiently developed and accepted in the economy and the society in Serbia; Still present linear model of governance of the R&D and innovation system in the country; this is the main obstacle for networking of R&D sector with the rest of economy and society. A crucial challenge for research governance in Serbia is the question how to increase R&D and Innovation activities in the BES; One of the significant problems in preserving and strengthening the scientific community is the ongoing drain of highly educated individuals from the country; Absence of evaluation culture and practice in R&D and innovation system in Serbia; Insufficient knowledge about R&D and innovation capacities in BES; Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 20

Policies for KT development at universities and PROs in Serbia Challenges of knowledge transfer in Serbia: The attractiveness of R&D system in Serbia for private investments in R&D is insufficient because of the present structure and capacities of public R&D system. Restructuring of public R&D system and integration of BES into national innovation system is primary task for the government. In addition, legal framework is not in favour of private sector engagement in R&D and innovation activities; Undeveloped infrastructure for innovative entrepreneurship and lack of culture for technological entrepreneurship in Higher Education Sector (HES) and public R&D laboratories and institutes (PRO Public Research Organisations); Recognition of the needs for financing of innovation activities with a much larger budget and significantly increased financing per innovation grant; Lack of demand-side R&D and innovation policy tools and measures in Serbia. Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 21

Case Study 1 Spin-off companies in R&D sector: Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad: 68+ spin-offs; Mihajlo Pupin Institute; Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 22

Case Study 2 Competition for Best Technology Innovation: The project Competition for Best Technology Innovation is initiated in 2005 by the Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection of Serbia. The idea for this project came from Faculty of Technical Science Novi Sad based on successful pilot competition for its students in 2003; The number of reported innovations by the end of 2010 is 1615, the total number of innovations that pass the first round of review is 970; Total prize money by 2010 was 53.18 million dinars, of which 46,335,000 dinars was funded by MSTD; So far in this competition a total of 5360 competitors participated, it was held 234 trainings, 476 teams have written a business plan for setting up a business based on their inventions and 115 teams have drafted marketing plan; Over 350 reviewers from home and abroad, has participated in this contest; By 2010 it is established 44 enterprises; http://www.inovacija.org/ Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 23

Thank you for your attention! Questions & Answers Presentation Djuro Kutlaca Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012 AL-BA-MK-MN-RS Tirana, 13/06/2012 24